Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee-Public Teleconference, 65443-65444 [2012-26328]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
• Modifications, which will permit
the airfield to accommodate general
aviation users.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Landside
• Construction of surface parking
areas and access roads to accommodate
automobiles in the airport terminal and
air cargo areas and provide an adequate
level of access to the airport.
• Construction or relocation of access
roads to provide efficient and
convenient movement of vehicular
traffic to, on, and from the airport,
including access to passenger, air cargo,
fixed base operations, and aircraft
maintenance areas.
• Modification or construction of
facilities such as passenger terminals,
surface automobile parking lots,
hangars, air cargo terminal buildings,
and access roads to cargo facilities to
accommodate civil use.
(6) An evaluation of the ability of
surface transportation facilities (e.g.,
road, rail, high-speed rail, and/or
maritime) to provide intermodal
connections.
(7) A description of the type and level
of aviation and community interest in
the civil use of a current or former
military airport.
(8) One copy of the FAA-approved
ALP for each copy of the application.
The ALP or supporting information
should clearly show capacity and
conversion related projects. Other
information such as project costs,
schedule, project justification, other
maps and drawings showing the project
locations, and any other supporting
documentation that would make the
application easier to understand should
also be included. You may also provide
photos, which would further describe
the airport, projects, and otherwise
clarify certain aspects of this
application. These maps and ALP’s
should be cross-referenced with the
project costs and project descriptions.
Redesignation of Airports Previously
Designated and Applying for up to an
Additional Five Years in the Program
Airports applying for redesignation to
the Military Airport Program must
submit the same information required
by new candidate airports applying for
a new designation. On the SF 424,
Application for Federal Assistance,
prescribed by the Office of Management
and Budget Circular A–102, airports
must indicate their application is for
redesignation to the MAP. In addition to
the information required for new
candidates, airports requesting
redesignation must also explain:
(1) Why a redesignation and
additional MAP eligible project funding
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Oct 25, 2012
Jkt 229001
is needed to accomplish the conversion
to meet the civil role of the airport and
the preferred time period for
redesignation not, to exceed five years;
(2) Why funding of eligible work
under other categories of AIP or other
sources of funding would not
accomplish the development needs of
the airport; and
(3) Why, based on the previously
funded MAP projects, the projects and/
or funding level were insufficient to
accomplish the airport conversion needs
and development goals.
In addition to the information
requested above, airports applying for
redesignation must provide a reanalysis
of their original business/marketing
plans (for example, a plan previously
funded by the Office of Economic
Adjustment or the original Master Plan
for the airport) and prepare a report. If
there is not an existing business/
marketing plan a business/marketing
plan or strategy must be developed. The
report must contain:
(1) Whether the original business/
marketing plan is still appropriate;
(2) Is the airport continuing to work
towards the goals established in the
business/marketing plan;
(3) Discuss how the MAP projects
contained in the application contribute
to the goals of the sponsor and their
plans; and
(4) If the business/marketing plan no
longer applies to the current goals of the
airport, how has the airport altered the
business/marketing plan to establish a
new direction for the facility and how
do the projects contained in the MAP
application aid in the completion of the
new direction and goals and by what
date does the sponsor anticipate
graduating from the MAP.
This notice is issued pursuant to Title
49 U.S.C. 47118.
Issued at Washington, DC, on October 3,
2012.
Benito DeLeon,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and
Programming.
[FR Doc. 2012–26329 Filed 10–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Commercial Space Transportation
Advisory Committee—Public
Teleconference
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space
Transportation Advisory Committee
Teleconference.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65443
Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice
is hereby given of three teleconferences
of the Systems Working Group of the
Commercial Space Transportation
Advisory Committee (COMSTAC). The
teleconferences will take place on:
Tuesday November 13, 2012, Tuesday
December 18, 2012, and Tuesday
January 15, 2013. All teleconferences
will begin at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard
Time and will last approximately one
hour. Individuals who plan to
participate should contact Paul Eckert,
Designated Federal Officer (DFO), (the
Contact Person listed below) by phone
or email for the teleconference call-in
number.
The purpose of these three
teleconferences is to assist the FAA
early in its development of regulations
to protect occupants of commercial
suborbital and orbital spacecraft. In a
Federal Register notice dated July 30,
2012, the FAA announced its desire to
engage with COMSTAC on a periodic
basis, approximately once per month,
on specific topics. The three
teleconferences announced today are a
continuation of the three announced in
July.
As we noted in the July Federal
Register notice, the FAA has not yet
targeted a date for proposing regulations
to protect the health and safety of crew
and space flight participants. However,
the FAA believes that the development
of sound and appropriate regulations for
human space flight can only be
achieved with a deliberate, multi-year
effort, and that early industry input into
this regulatory effort before any formal
proposal by the FAA is critical.
The topics for the first three
teleconferences were: (1) What Level of
Safety Should FAA Target? (2) What
Should FAA Oversight Look Like? and
(3) What Types of Requirements and
Associated Guidance Material Should
FAA Develop? The topics for three
follow-on teleconferences are as follows:
(1) Key Terms and Definitions for
Commercial Human Space Flight Safety
Regulations. We would like to discuss
key terms and definitions relevant to
commercial human spaceflight
regulations, and characterize their
potential impacts to the various parties
who have a vested interest in the
industry. Terms that will be discussed
include:
a. Abort.
b. Contingency.
c. Emergency.
d. Early Flight Return.
e. Landing Site.
(2) Aborts and Abort Systems. Abort
systems have in the past been an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
65444
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
element of many government human
space flight systems for the purpose of
enhancing occupant safety. We will
discuss the following questions from a
regulatory perspective:
a. Is an abort system a part of fault
tolerance?
b. Does an abort only apply to the
launch/ascent phase, or does it apply to
other flight phases as well?
c. Should certain types of orbital or
suborbital vehicle designs require a
launch abort system?
d. What should the reliability
requirements be for an abort system?
e. Is it acceptable to have a different
level of care for occupants during an
abort?
(3) Fault Tolerance, Margin, and
Reliability. To allow for industry
innovation, the commercial human
space flight industry wishes to be free
to the maximum extent possible to
choose between fault tolerance, design
margin, and reliability. We will explore
the extent of this desire from a
regulatory perspective with the
following questions:
a. What would be an acceptable
rationale at a functional level for a
choice of fault tolerance, design margin,
or high reliability to protect the safety
of spacecraft occupants?
b. What is the minimum level of fault
tolerance? Is it different for orbital vs.
suborbital?
c. When is occupant risk high enough
to necessitate additional fault tolerance?
d. What determines whether fault
tolerance is handled at the function
level or system level?
Interested members of the public may
submit relevant written statements for
the COMSTAC working group members
to consider under the advisory process.
Statements may concern the issues and
agenda items mentioned above or
additional issues that may be relevant
for the U.S. commercial space
transportation industry. Interested
parties wishing to submit written
statements should contact Paul Eckert,
DFO, (the Contact Person listed below)
in writing (mail or email) by November
6, 2012, for the November 13
teleconference, December 11, 2012, for
the December 18 teleconference, and
January 8, 2013, for the January 15
teleconference. This way the
information can be made available to
COMSTAC members for their review
and consideration before each
teleconference. Written statements
should be supplied in the following
formats: One hard copy with original
signature or one electronic copy via
email. The FAA may schedule up to 6
more teleconferences in the coming
months to allow the U.S. commercial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Oct 25, 2012
Jkt 229001
space transportation industry to share
views with the FAA on a number of
specific topics related to commercial
human space flight safety.
An agenda will be posted on the FAA
Web site at https://www.faa.gov/go/ast
and https://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/
COMSTAC_working_group/
Individuals who plan to participate
and need special assistance should
inform the Contact Person listed below
in advance of the meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Eckert (AST–5), Office of Commercial
Space Transportation (AST), 800
Independence Avenue SW., Room 331,
Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202)
267–8655; Email paul.eckert@faa.gov.
Complete information regarding
COMSTAC is available on the FAA Web
site at: https://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/
advisory_committee/.
Issued in Washington, DC, October 16,
2012.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial
Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2012–26328 Filed 10–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0148, Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 1991
Mercedes-Benz G-Class (463 Chassis)
Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles Are
Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that 1991
Mercedes-Benz G-class (463 chassis)
multi-purpose passenger vehicles
(MPVs) that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they have safety features that
comply with, or are capable of being
altered to comply with, all such
standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is November 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How To Read Comments Submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65443-65444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26328]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee--Public
Teleconference
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee
Teleconference.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of three
teleconferences of the Systems Working Group of the Commercial Space
Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC). The teleconferences will
take place on: Tuesday November 13, 2012, Tuesday December 18, 2012,
and Tuesday January 15, 2013. All teleconferences will begin at 1:00
p.m. Eastern Standard Time and will last approximately one hour.
Individuals who plan to participate should contact Paul Eckert,
Designated Federal Officer (DFO), (the Contact Person listed below) by
phone or email for the teleconference call-in number.
The purpose of these three teleconferences is to assist the FAA
early in its development of regulations to protect occupants of
commercial suborbital and orbital spacecraft. In a Federal Register
notice dated July 30, 2012, the FAA announced its desire to engage with
COMSTAC on a periodic basis, approximately once per month, on specific
topics. The three teleconferences announced today are a continuation of
the three announced in July.
As we noted in the July Federal Register notice, the FAA has not
yet targeted a date for proposing regulations to protect the health and
safety of crew and space flight participants. However, the FAA believes
that the development of sound and appropriate regulations for human
space flight can only be achieved with a deliberate, multi-year effort,
and that early industry input into this regulatory effort before any
formal proposal by the FAA is critical.
The topics for the first three teleconferences were: (1) What Level
of Safety Should FAA Target? (2) What Should FAA Oversight Look Like?
and (3) What Types of Requirements and Associated Guidance Material
Should FAA Develop? The topics for three follow-on teleconferences are
as follows:
(1) Key Terms and Definitions for Commercial Human Space Flight
Safety Regulations. We would like to discuss key terms and definitions
relevant to commercial human spaceflight regulations, and characterize
their potential impacts to the various parties who have a vested
interest in the industry. Terms that will be discussed include:
a. Abort.
b. Contingency.
c. Emergency.
d. Early Flight Return.
e. Landing Site.
(2) Aborts and Abort Systems. Abort systems have in the past been
an
[[Page 65444]]
element of many government human space flight systems for the purpose
of enhancing occupant safety. We will discuss the following questions
from a regulatory perspective:
a. Is an abort system a part of fault tolerance?
b. Does an abort only apply to the launch/ascent phase, or does it
apply to other flight phases as well?
c. Should certain types of orbital or suborbital vehicle designs
require a launch abort system?
d. What should the reliability requirements be for an abort system?
e. Is it acceptable to have a different level of care for occupants
during an abort?
(3) Fault Tolerance, Margin, and Reliability. To allow for industry
innovation, the commercial human space flight industry wishes to be
free to the maximum extent possible to choose between fault tolerance,
design margin, and reliability. We will explore the extent of this
desire from a regulatory perspective with the following questions:
a. What would be an acceptable rationale at a functional level for
a choice of fault tolerance, design margin, or high reliability to
protect the safety of spacecraft occupants?
b. What is the minimum level of fault tolerance? Is it different
for orbital vs. suborbital?
c. When is occupant risk high enough to necessitate additional
fault tolerance?
d. What determines whether fault tolerance is handled at the
function level or system level?
Interested members of the public may submit relevant written
statements for the COMSTAC working group members to consider under the
advisory process. Statements may concern the issues and agenda items
mentioned above or additional issues that may be relevant for the U.S.
commercial space transportation industry. Interested parties wishing to
submit written statements should contact Paul Eckert, DFO, (the Contact
Person listed below) in writing (mail or email) by November 6, 2012,
for the November 13 teleconference, December 11, 2012, for the December
18 teleconference, and January 8, 2013, for the January 15
teleconference. This way the information can be made available to
COMSTAC members for their review and consideration before each
teleconference. Written statements should be supplied in the following
formats: One hard copy with original signature or one electronic copy
via email. The FAA may schedule up to 6 more teleconferences in the
coming months to allow the U.S. commercial space transportation
industry to share views with the FAA on a number of specific topics
related to commercial human space flight safety.
An agenda will be posted on the FAA Web site at https://www.faa.gov/go/ast and https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/COMSTAC_working_group/
Individuals who plan to participate and need special assistance
should inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the
meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Eckert (AST-5), Office of
Commercial Space Transportation (AST), 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-8655; Email
paul.eckert@faa.gov. Complete information regarding COMSTAC is
available on the FAA Web site at: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/advisory_committee/.
Issued in Washington, DC, October 16, 2012.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2012-26328 Filed 10-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P