Tehachapi Uplands Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; Kern County, CA; Final Environmental Impact Statement, 65398-65401 [2012-26169]
Download as PDF
65398
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
Missouri
Crane Radio Station
Elm Street Rd.
Marionville MO 65633
Landholding Agency: GSA
Property Number: 54201240003
Status: Excess
GSA Number: 7–B–MO–0698
Comments: 213 sf.; sits on 4.65 acres; storage
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
North Carolina
Tract 29666
209 Water Plant Rd.
Ocracoke NC 27960
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240001
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Cape Hatteras Nat’l Seashore
Comments: Off-site removal only; 1180 sf.; 12
mons. vacant; residential; extensive mold;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; secured area; contact Interior for
info. on accessibility/removal
Tract 29665
199 Water Plant Rd.
Ocracoke NC 27960
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240002
Status: Unutilized
Comments: Off-site removal; 1180 sf.; 12
mons. vacant; residential; extensive mold;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; secured area; contact Interior for
info. on accessibility/removal
Tract 29664
189 Water Plant Rd.
Ocracoke NC 27960
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240003
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Cape Hatteras Nat’l Seashore
Comments: Off-site removal only; 1180 sf.; 12
mons. vacant; residential; extensive mold;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; secured area; contact Interior for
info. on accessibility/removal
Tract 29960
221 Water Plant Rd.
Ocracoke NC 27960
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240004
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Cape Hatteras Nat’l Seashore
Comments: Off-site removal only; 1180 sf.; 12
mons. vacant; residential; extensive mold;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; secured area; contact Interior for
info. on accessibility/removal
Tract 28757
46500 Light House Rd.
Buxton NC 27960
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240005
Status: Unutilized
Directions: Cape Hatteras Nat’l Seashore
Comments: Off-site removal only; 741 sf.;
storage; 120 mons. vacant; mold damage;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; secured area; contact Interior for
info. on accessibility/removal
Tract 59930
214 Dare Ave.
Manteo NC 27954
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240006
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Oct 25, 2012
Jkt 229001
Status: Unutilized
Comments: Off-site removal only; 1161 sf.;
residential; 12 mons. vacant; mold damage;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; erosion; secured area; contact
Interior for info. on accessibility/removal
Tract 59929
216 Dare Ave.
Manteo NC 27954
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240007
Status: Unutilized
Comments: Off-site removal only; 839 sf.;
residential; 24 mons. vacant; mold damage;
holes in interior/exterior; rodent infested;
leaky roof; secured area; contact Interior for
info. on accessibility/removal
Oklahoma
Lamar Radio Station
S. of County Rd.
Lamar OK 74850
Landholding Agency: GSA
Property Number: 54201240002
Status: Excess
GSA Number: 7–B–OK–0581
Comments: 152 sf.; sits on 4.65 acres; storage
Pennsylvania
Tract 101–30
4501 County Line Rd.
King of Prussia PA 19406
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201240009
Status: Excess
Comments: Off-site removal only; 500 sf.;
7yrs. vacant; extensive deterioration;
hillside is used as stabilization; removal
may be extremely difficult- may destroy
property
Texas
6 Bldgs.
901 South Glenbrook
Garland TX 75040
Landholding Agency: Air Force
Property Number: 18201240001
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 1,3,4,5,7&8
Comments: Off-site removal only; 42,501 sf.;
office & shop; 24 mons. vacant; repairs
needed; contamination; needs remediation;
secured area; contact AF for info. on
accessibility/removal
Veterans Post Office
1300 Mutamoros St.
Laredo TX 78040
Landholding Agency: GSA
Property Number: 54201240001
Status: Excess
GSA Number: 7–G–TX–1055–AA
Comments: 8,498 sf.; sits on 1.2 acres; office;
105 yrs-old; historic preservation
restrictions on bldg. & ground
Unsuitable Properties
Building
California
Facilities 01085 & 01086
1 Admin. Circle
China Lake CA 93555
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201240002
Status: Unutilized
Comments: Located w/in secured boundary
of a military installation; public access
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
denied; no alternative method to gain
access w/out compromising nat’l security
Reasons: Secured Area
Washington
Bldg. 7029
Snook Rd.—Bangor
Naval Base Kitsap WA
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201240001
Status: Excess
Comments: Located w/in secured area where
public access is denied & no alternative
method to gain access w/out compromising
nat’l security
Reasons: Secured Area
[FR Doc. 2012–26066 Filed 10–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–2012–N220; FF08E00000–
FXES11120800000–134]
Tehachapi Uplands Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan; Kern
County, CA; Final Environmental
Impact Statement
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service announces the availability for
public review of a final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), Tehachapi
Uplands Multiple Species habitat
Conservation Plan (TU MSHCP), and
Implementing Agreement (IA), related to
an application by Tejon Ranchcorp
(Tejon or applicant) for an Incidental
Take Permit (ITP or permit) pursuant to
the Endangered Species Act (Act). The
final documents reflect changes made to
the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS and
TU MSHCP/IA resulting from comments
received during the 90-day public
comment period. Responses to
comments from the 2011 comment
period are included in the EIS. This
notice provides an opportunity for the
public to review the final documents
and responses to comments. The
proposed 50-year ITP would authorize
incidental take of 27 species associated
with plan-wide activities and limited
development activities on portions of
Tejon Ranch.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received by 5 p.m. Pacific Time,
November 26, 2012.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
Obtaining Documents: You
may download copies of the EIS, TU
MSHCP, and IA on the Internet at
https://www.fws.gov/ventura/.
Alternatively, you may use one of the
methods below to request hard copies or
a CD–ROM of the documents.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit comments or requests for copies
or more information by one of the
following methods.
• Email: fw8tumshcp@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Tehachapi Uplands MSHCP/
EIS Comments’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• U.S. Mail: Roger Root, Assistant
Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003.
• In-Person Drop-off, Viewing, or
Pickup: Call (805) 644–1766 to make an
appointment during regular business
hours at the above address.
• Fax: Roger Root, Assistant Field
Supervisor, (805) 644–3958, Attn.:
Tehachapi Uplands MSHCP/EIS
Comments.
Hard bound copies of the EIS, TU
MSHCP, and IA are available for
viewing at the following locations:
1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA
93003.
2. Kern County Library, Frazier Park
Branch, 3732 Park Drive, Frazier Park,
CA 93225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Simmons, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, at 805–644–1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Introduction
We have received an application for
an incidental take permit covering 27
listed and unlisted species that may be
taken or otherwise affected by planwide activities and future low-density
residential and commercial
development activities on a portion of
the Tejon Ranch (Ranch). The applicant
has prepared the TU MSHCP to satisfy
the requirements for a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit under the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The permit is
requested to authorize the incidental
take of species that could potentially
result from plan-wide activities
occurring throughout the 141,886 acres
of lands proposed to be covered by the
permit (‘‘covered lands’’), and from
approximately 5,533 acres of mountain
resort and other development within
and adjacent to the Interstate-5 corridor
and Lebec community within the
covered lands in Kern County,
California. The TU MSHCP proposes a
conservation strategy to minimize and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Oct 25, 2012
Jkt 229001
mitigate to the maximum extent
practicable the impacts of any
incidental taking that could occur to
covered species as the result of the
covered activities.
Background
Section 9 of the Act and Federal
regulations prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of
wildlife species listed as endangered or
threatened (16 U.S.C. 1538). The Act
defines the term ‘‘take’’ as to harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture, or collect listed species, or
to attempt to engage in such conduct (16
U.S.C. 1532). Harm includes significant
habitat modification or degradation that
actually kills or injures listed wildlife
by significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding,
feeding, and sheltering [50 CFR 17.3(c)].
Pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Act, the Service may issue permits to
authorize ‘‘incidental take’’ of listed
animal species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is
defined by the Act as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
carrying out an otherwise lawful
activity. Regulations governing permits
for threatened species and endangered
species, respectively, are at 50 CFR
17.32 and 50 CFR 17.22.
Although take of listed plant species
is not prohibited under the Act, and
therefore cannot be authorized by an
incidental take permit, plant species
may be included on a permit in
recognition of the conservation benefits
provided to them by a habitat
conservation plan. All species included
on an incidental take permit would
receive assurances under the Service’s
‘‘No Surprises’’ regulation [50 CFR
17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)].
The applicant seeks a 50-year
incidental take permit for covered
activities within 141,886 acres of
covered lands on Tejon Ranch in Kern
County, California. Proposed covered
activities include plan-wide activities,
which consist of both ongoing activities
that have historically occurred at the
Ranch, such as grazing and film
production, and new activities,
including limited public access for
passive recreational purposes. Up to 200
acres could be disturbed to facilitate
plan-wide activities. Proposed covered
activities also include planned future
community development of
approximately 5,533 acres within and
adjacent to the Interstate-5 corridor in
the Tejon Mountain Village Planning
Area and the Lebec/Existing
Headquarters Area. The permit would
also cover take minimization, mitigation
and conservation measures provided
under the TU MSHCP and intended to
minimize and mitigate the effect of take
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65399
to the maximum extent practicable. The
permit would not cover hunting or
mineral extraction.
Species proposed for coverage in the
TU MSHCP are species that are
currently listed as federally threatened
or endangered or have the potential to
become listed during the term of the
permit and have some likelihood to
occur within the covered lands. Should
any of the unlisted covered wildlife
species become listed under the Act
during the term of the permit, take
authorization for those species would
become effective upon listing. Twentyone animal species and six plant species
known to occur or having the potential
to occur within the covered lands are
proposed to be covered by the permit
(Covered Species). The permit would
include the following federally listed
animal species: California condor
(Gymnogyps californianus—federally
listed as endangered and State listed as
endangered and fully protected), least
Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus—
federally listed as endangered),
southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus—federally
listed as endangered), and Valley
elderberry longhorn beetle (Democerus
californicus dimorphus—federally listed
as threatened). The permit would also
include the following species currently
unlisted under the Act: western yellowbilled cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus
occidentalis– Federal candidate for
listing); Tehachapi slender salamander
(Batrachoseps stebbinsi), bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), American
peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus
anatum), little willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii brewsteri), golden
eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), white-tailed
kite (Elanus leucurus), ringtail
(Bassariscus astutus), tricolored
blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), Tehachapi
pocket mouse (Perognathus alticola
inexpectatus), burrowing owl (Athene
cunicularia), yellow-blotched
salamander (Ensatina eschscholtzii
croceater), western spadefoot (Spea
hammondii), purple martin (Progne
subis), yellow warbler (Dendroica
petechia brewsteri), coast horned lizard
(Phrynosoma coronatum (both frontale
and blainvillii populations)), twostriped garter snake (Thamnophis
hammondii), round-leaved filaree
(Erodium macrophyllum), Fort Tejon
woolly sunflower (Eriophyllum lanatum
var. hallii), Kusche’s sandwort (Arenaria
macradenia var. kuschei), Tehachapi
buckwheat (Eriogonum callistum),
striped adobe lily (Fritillaria striata),
and Tejon poppy (Eschscholzia
lemmonii ssp. kernensis).
The TU MSHCP includes a
conservation strategy intended to avoid,
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
65400
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
minimize, and mitigate to the maximum
extent practicable any impacts that
would occur to covered species as the
result of the covered activities. Under
the TU MSHCP, and consistent with the
Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land
Use Agreement between Tejon and the
Sierra Club, National Audubon Society,
Natural Resources Defense Council,
Endangered Habitats League, and
Planning and Conservation League
(Ranchwide Agreement), no land
development would be allowed within
approximately 93,522 acres of the
covered lands that constitute the
mitigation lands, including the
approximately 37,100-acre Tunis and
Winters ridge area. The Tunis and
Winters ridge area is designated as the
Condor Study Area under the TU
MSHCP and is the area of the ranch
most likely to be frequented by condors.
An additional 23,001 acres would be
preserved as mitigation lands within the
open space within the Tejon Mountain
Village Planning Area, resulting in the
permanent conservation of
approximately 82 percent of the covered
lands. In addition to the TU MSHCP
mitigation lands, approximately 12,795
acres of covered lands are subject to
existing conservation easements
acquired pursuant to the Ranchwide
Agreement and are required to be
managed in accordance with the TU
MSHCP. In total, approximately 91
percent of the covered lands would be
permanently conserved under the TU
MSHCP and Ranchwide Agreement.
Upon initiation of construction of the
Tejon Mountain Village development,
the TU MSCHP requires that the TU
MSHCP mitigation lands be
permanently protected by phased
recordation of conservation easements
or equivalent legal restrictions over all
such lands by the end of the permit
term. The TU MSCHP also requires
implementation of general and speciesspecific take avoidance, minimization,
and mitigation measures to reduce
potential impacts to the covered species.
With regard to the California condor, the
TU MSHCP requires the ongoing
monitoring of covered activities by a
qualified biologist to reduce the
potential for any human/condor
interactions and the permanent
enforcement of covenants, conditions,
and restrictions on residential
development to minimize any impacts
to condors. The TU MSHCP also
provides funding for condor capture,
care, and relocation in the unlikely
event that a condor becomes habituated
to human activities. No lethal take of
condors would be authorized under the
permit.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Oct 25, 2012
Jkt 229001
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
The Service’s proposed issuance of an
incidental take permit is a Federal
action and triggers the need for
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Service has
prepared an EIS that evaluates the
impacts of proposed issuance of the
permit and implementation of the TU
MSHCP, and also evaluates the impacts
of a reasonable range of alternatives.
The Final EIS analyzes four alternatives
in addition to the proposed TU MSHCP,
summarized above. The Service has
identified the proposed TU MSHCP as
the preferred alternative. The proposed
TU MSHCP alternative and the
remaining four alternatives are
summarized below.
The proposed TU MSHCP alternative,
described above, generally remains the
same as described in the 2011
Supplemental Draft EIS. It has been
updated to reflect approved mitigation
measures required by the county and
the State; to reflect clarifications made
to the covered species mitigation
measures proposed in the applicant’s
revised TU MSHCP; to reflect
information related to the final location
of two communication towers; to clarify
the number of hunting cabins allowed
on covered lands; and to update various
acreages associated with the revised TU
MSHCP. Where appropriate, we added
information and required mitigation
measures associated with the TMV
project approvals to the Supplemental
Draft EIS.
The no-action alternative, for the
purposes of analysis, remains the same
as described in the 2011 Supplemental
Draft EIS and assumes that the
Ranchwide Agreement would remain in
effect, that development of the TMV
project and other future commercial or
residential development allowed within
the covered lands under the Ranchwide
Agreement would not occur, and that
existing ranch uses would continue at
current levels into the future.
The condor-only HCP alternative
generally remains the same as described
in the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS and
continues to represent a species
management approach that addresses
only the California condor. Take of
other federally listed species would be
avoided under this alternative through
project-specific review and approvals,
and by siting development in a manner
that avoids occurrences of the species.
Development and open space
preservation would be consistent with
those elements described in the
Proposed TU MSHCP Alternative. Plan-
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
wide activities would also be the same
as those described in the proposed TU
MSHCP alternative, except that all
management and mitigation elements
would be limited to California condorrelated measures as set forth in the
proposed TU MSHCP alternative.
Similarly, the conservation measures
and adaptive management elements of
the condor-only HCP alternative would
be limited solely to those for the
California condor set forth in the
proposed TU MSHCP alternative.
The condor critical habitat (CCH)
avoidance MSHCP alternative remains
the same as described in the 2011
Supplemental Draft EIS. Plan-wide
activities would continue and the
proposed development areas avoid
federally designed critical habitat for
California condor. Under this
alternative, no commercial or residential
development would occur in any
designated critical habitat for California
condor. The TMV project would not
occur, as that project would extend into
California condor critical habitat.
Instead, development would follow
Kern County General Plan designations
and would cluster most commercial and
residential development in the
southwestern portion of the covered
lands, in the portion of the TMV
planning area nearest to Interstate 5, and
in other areas outside condor critical
habitat. The CCH avoidance MSHCP
alternative also assumes
implementation of the Ranchwide
Agreement, where development
boundaries outside critical habitat
conform to the development setbacks
and general boundaries provided in that
agreement.
The Kern County General Plan
Buildout alternative remains the same
as presented in the 2011 Supplemental
Draft EIS. While the Ranchwide
Agreement has resulted in the
recordation of conservation easements
on 12,795 acres of the covered lands
(existing conservation easement areas),
the remainder of the covered lands to be
precluded from development under the
Ranchwide Agreement do not currently
have conservation easements recorded.
As noted above, because the Ranchwide
Agreement is a private agreement
between parties, and Service is not a
party to and has no contractual standing
under the agreement, the agreement can
be amended (or even terminated) by
mutual agreement of the parties such
that the land preservation outcome of
the Ranchwide Agreement on covered
lands may not be realized. While the
Service considers remote the likelihood
that the Ranchwide Agreement would
be terminated, for purposes of
comprehensive NEPA analysis, this
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
alternative does not assume
continuation of the Ranchwide
Agreement except for the permanent
protection of the already-recorded
conservation easements on the existing
conservation easement lands.
Under the Kern County General Plan
buildout alternative, development is
assumed to proceed in accordance with
the Kern County General Plan,
including implementation of the TMV
project (per the TMV project approvals).
Development of the covered lands
would require additional Kern County
approval, and the EIS analysis assumes
that development would proceed on a
project-by-project basis and that the
Service would issue incidental take
authorization as appropriate through
either section 7 of the Act or the section
10 process under the Act.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Public Involvement
We published a Notice of Intent (NOI)
to prepare an EIS for a California
Condor Habitat Conservation Plan
(Condor HCP) in the Federal Register on
June 25, 2004 (69 FR 35663). The NOI
announced a 30-day public scoping
period that ended on July 26, 2004. On
March 26, 2008, a NOI to prepare an EIS
for the TU MSHCP was published in the
Federal Register (73 FR 16052). The
NOI announced a 30-day public scoping
period that ended on April 25, 2008. We
published a revised notice of intent
(NOI) to prepare an EIS for this project
in the Federal Register on June 4, 2008
(73 FR 31876); this NOI clarified the
proposed action and corrected a posting
error in the March 2008 NOI. On
February 4, 2009, we published a notice
of availability of the Draft Plan, EIS, and
IA in the Federal Register (74 FR 6050).
The Draft documents were initially
available for a 90-day public comment
period, which was extended, with a
Notice of a 60-day Extension issued on
May 5, 2009. On February 3, 2012, we
published a notice of availability of the
Supplemental Draft EIS, Plan and IA in
the Federal Register (77 FR 5564). The
Supplemental Draft documents were
available for a 90-day public comment
period, which concluded on May 3,
2012.
Public Review
Copies of the Final EIS, TU MSHCP,
and IA are available for review (see
ADDRESSES). Any comments we receive
will become part of the administrative
record and will be available to the
public. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Oct 25, 2012
Jkt 229001
be made publicly available at any time.
If you wish us to withhold your name
and/or address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Decision
We will evaluate the application,
associated documents, and comments
submitted to determine whether the
application meets the requirements of
section 10(a) of the Act. A permit
decision will be made no sooner than 30
days after the publication of the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
notice of the EIS in the Federal Register
and completion of a Record of Decision.
This notice is provided pursuant to
section 10(a) of the Act and pursuant to
implementing regulations for NEPA (40
CFR 1506.6).
Dated: October 16, 2012.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2012–26169 Filed 10–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAZ910000.L13400000.DT0000.
LXSS058A0000]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Restoration Design Energy Project
and Proposed Resource Management
Plan Amendments, AZ
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Council
on Environmental Quality and the
Department of the Interior (DOI)
regulations implementing NEPA, and
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976, as amended
(FLPMA), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Arizona State Office
has prepared Proposed Resource
Management Plan (RMP) Amendments
and a Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Restoration
Design Energy Project (RDEP) and by
this notice is announcing its
availability.
SUMMARY:
The BLM planning regulations
state that any person who meets the
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65401
conditions as described in the
regulations may protest the BLM’s
Proposed RMP Amendments/Final EIS.
A person who meets the conditions and
wishes to file a protest must file the
protest within 30 days of the date that
the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability
(NOA) in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the RDEP
Proposed RMP Amendments/Final EIS
have been sent to affected Federal, State,
and local government agencies; tribes;
and other stakeholders. Copies of the
Proposed RMP Amendments/Final EIS
are available for public inspection at the
BLM Arizona State Office, One North
Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ
85004. The Proposed RMP
Amendments/Final EIS can also be
downloaded from the project’s Web site
at https://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/
energy/arra_solar.htm. All protests must
be in writing and mailed to one of the
following addresses:
Regular Mail: BLM Director (WO210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O.
Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024–
1383
Overnight Mail: BLM Director (WO210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, 20 M
Street SE., Room 2134 LM,
Washington, DC 20003
Publication of the Proposed RMP
Amendments/Final EIS NOA does not
trigger a formal public comment period.
The BLM, however, may choose to
review any comments submitted
following the publication of the
Proposed RMP Amendments/Final EIS
NOA and use the comments to inform
the records of decision (RODs).
Individuals should note that the BLM
will consider such comments only to
the extent practicable and will not
respond to comments individually.
Comments may be submitted by the
following methods:
Email: az_arra_rdep@blm.gov,
Fax: Attn: Lane Cowger, 602–417–
9452;
Mail or other delivery service: BLM
Arizona State Office, Attention:
Restoration Design Energy Project, One
North Central Avenue, Suite 800,
Phoenix, AZ 85004–4427.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Pedrick, BLM Project Manager;
telephone: 602–417–9235; mail: One
North Central Avenue, Suite 800,
Phoenix, AZ 85004–4427; or email:
az_arra_rdep@blm.gov. Persons who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65398-65401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26169]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-2012-N220; FF08E00000-FXES11120800000-134]
Tehachapi Uplands Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan;
Kern County, CA; Final Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces the availability
for public review of a final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
Tehachapi Uplands Multiple Species habitat Conservation Plan (TU
MSHCP), and Implementing Agreement (IA), related to an application by
Tejon Ranchcorp (Tejon or applicant) for an Incidental Take Permit (ITP
or permit) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (Act). The final
documents reflect changes made to the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS and
TU MSHCP/IA resulting from comments received during the 90-day public
comment period. Responses to comments from the 2011 comment period are
included in the EIS. This notice provides an opportunity for the public
to review the final documents and responses to comments. The proposed
50-year ITP would authorize incidental take of 27 species associated
with plan-wide activities and limited development activities on
portions of Tejon Ranch.
DATES: Written comments must be received by 5 p.m. Pacific Time,
November 26, 2012.
[[Page 65399]]
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You may download copies of the EIS, TU
MSHCP, and IA on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/ventura/.
Alternatively, you may use one of the methods below to request hard
copies or a CD-ROM of the documents.
Submitting Comments: You may submit comments or requests for copies
or more information by one of the following methods.
Email: fw8tumshcp@fws.gov. Include ``Tehachapi Uplands
MSHCP/EIS Comments'' in the subject line of the message.
U.S. Mail: Roger Root, Assistant Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA
93003.
In-Person Drop-off, Viewing, or Pickup: Call (805) 644-
1766 to make an appointment during regular business hours at the above
address.
Fax: Roger Root, Assistant Field Supervisor, (805) 644-
3958, Attn.: Tehachapi Uplands MSHCP/EIS Comments.
Hard bound copies of the EIS, TU MSHCP, and IA are available for
viewing at the following locations:
1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003.
2. Kern County Library, Frazier Park Branch, 3732 Park Drive,
Frazier Park, CA 93225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Simmons, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at 805-644-1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
We have received an application for an incidental take permit
covering 27 listed and unlisted species that may be taken or otherwise
affected by plan-wide activities and future low-density residential and
commercial development activities on a portion of the Tejon Ranch
(Ranch). The applicant has prepared the TU MSHCP to satisfy the
requirements for a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit under the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). The permit is requested to authorize the incidental take
of species that could potentially result from plan-wide activities
occurring throughout the 141,886 acres of lands proposed to be covered
by the permit (``covered lands''), and from approximately 5,533 acres
of mountain resort and other development within and adjacent to the
Interstate-5 corridor and Lebec community within the covered lands in
Kern County, California. The TU MSHCP proposes a conservation strategy
to minimize and mitigate to the maximum extent practicable the impacts
of any incidental taking that could occur to covered species as the
result of the covered activities.
Background
Section 9 of the Act and Federal regulations prohibit the ``take''
of wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened (16 U.S.C.
1538). The Act defines the term ``take'' as to harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect listed species, or
to attempt to engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532). Harm includes
significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or
injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral
patterns, including breeding, feeding, and sheltering [50 CFR 17.3(c)].
Pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act, the Service may issue
permits to authorize ``incidental take'' of listed animal species.
``Incidental take'' is defined by the Act as take that is incidental
to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity.
Regulations governing permits for threatened species and endangered
species, respectively, are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 50 CFR 17.22.
Although take of listed plant species is not prohibited under the
Act, and therefore cannot be authorized by an incidental take permit,
plant species may be included on a permit in recognition of the
conservation benefits provided to them by a habitat conservation plan.
All species included on an incidental take permit would receive
assurances under the Service's ``No Surprises'' regulation [50 CFR
17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)].
The applicant seeks a 50-year incidental take permit for covered
activities within 141,886 acres of covered lands on Tejon Ranch in Kern
County, California. Proposed covered activities include plan-wide
activities, which consist of both ongoing activities that have
historically occurred at the Ranch, such as grazing and film
production, and new activities, including limited public access for
passive recreational purposes. Up to 200 acres could be disturbed to
facilitate plan-wide activities. Proposed covered activities also
include planned future community development of approximately 5,533
acres within and adjacent to the Interstate-5 corridor in the Tejon
Mountain Village Planning Area and the Lebec/Existing Headquarters
Area. The permit would also cover take minimization, mitigation and
conservation measures provided under the TU MSHCP and intended to
minimize and mitigate the effect of take to the maximum extent
practicable. The permit would not cover hunting or mineral extraction.
Species proposed for coverage in the TU MSHCP are species that are
currently listed as federally threatened or endangered or have the
potential to become listed during the term of the permit and have some
likelihood to occur within the covered lands. Should any of the
unlisted covered wildlife species become listed under the Act during
the term of the permit, take authorization for those species would
become effective upon listing. Twenty-one animal species and six plant
species known to occur or having the potential to occur within the
covered lands are proposed to be covered by the permit (Covered
Species). The permit would include the following federally listed
animal species: California condor (Gymnogyps californianus--federally
listed as endangered and State listed as endangered and fully
protected), least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus--federally listed
as endangered), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii
extimus--federally listed as endangered), and Valley elderberry
longhorn beetle (Democerus californicus dimorphus--federally listed as
threatened). The permit would also include the following species
currently unlisted under the Act: western yellow-billed cuckoo
(Coccyzus americanus occidentalis- Federal candidate for listing);
Tehachapi slender salamander (Batrachoseps stebbinsi), bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), American peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus
anatum), little willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii brewsteri),
golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus),
ringtail (Bassariscus astutus), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius
tricolor), Tehachapi pocket mouse (Perognathus alticola inexpectatus),
burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), yellow-blotched salamander
(Ensatina eschscholtzii croceater), western spadefoot (Spea hammondii),
purple martin (Progne subis), yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia
brewsteri), coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum (both frontale
and blainvillii populations)), two-striped garter snake (Thamnophis
hammondii), round-leaved filaree (Erodium macrophyllum), Fort Tejon
woolly sunflower (Eriophyllum lanatum var. hallii), Kusche's sandwort
(Arenaria macradenia var. kuschei), Tehachapi buckwheat (Eriogonum
callistum), striped adobe lily (Fritillaria striata), and Tejon poppy
(Eschscholzia lemmonii ssp. kernensis).
The TU MSHCP includes a conservation strategy intended to avoid,
[[Page 65400]]
minimize, and mitigate to the maximum extent practicable any impacts
that would occur to covered species as the result of the covered
activities. Under the TU MSHCP, and consistent with the Tejon Ranch
Conservation and Land Use Agreement between Tejon and the Sierra Club,
National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Endangered
Habitats League, and Planning and Conservation League (Ranchwide
Agreement), no land development would be allowed within approximately
93,522 acres of the covered lands that constitute the mitigation lands,
including the approximately 37,100-acre Tunis and Winters ridge area.
The Tunis and Winters ridge area is designated as the Condor Study Area
under the TU MSHCP and is the area of the ranch most likely to be
frequented by condors. An additional 23,001 acres would be preserved as
mitigation lands within the open space within the Tejon Mountain
Village Planning Area, resulting in the permanent conservation of
approximately 82 percent of the covered lands. In addition to the TU
MSHCP mitigation lands, approximately 12,795 acres of covered lands are
subject to existing conservation easements acquired pursuant to the
Ranchwide Agreement and are required to be managed in accordance with
the TU MSHCP. In total, approximately 91 percent of the covered lands
would be permanently conserved under the TU MSHCP and Ranchwide
Agreement.
Upon initiation of construction of the Tejon Mountain Village
development, the TU MSCHP requires that the TU MSHCP mitigation lands
be permanently protected by phased recordation of conservation
easements or equivalent legal restrictions over all such lands by the
end of the permit term. The TU MSCHP also requires implementation of
general and species-specific take avoidance, minimization, and
mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to the covered species.
With regard to the California condor, the TU MSHCP requires the ongoing
monitoring of covered activities by a qualified biologist to reduce the
potential for any human/condor interactions and the permanent
enforcement of covenants, conditions, and restrictions on residential
development to minimize any impacts to condors. The TU MSHCP also
provides funding for condor capture, care, and relocation in the
unlikely event that a condor becomes habituated to human activities. No
lethal take of condors would be authorized under the permit.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance
The Service's proposed issuance of an incidental take permit is a
Federal action and triggers the need for compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Service
has prepared an EIS that evaluates the impacts of proposed issuance of
the permit and implementation of the TU MSHCP, and also evaluates the
impacts of a reasonable range of alternatives. The Final EIS analyzes
four alternatives in addition to the proposed TU MSHCP, summarized
above. The Service has identified the proposed TU MSHCP as the
preferred alternative. The proposed TU MSHCP alternative and the
remaining four alternatives are summarized below.
The proposed TU MSHCP alternative, described above, generally
remains the same as described in the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS. It
has been updated to reflect approved mitigation measures required by
the county and the State; to reflect clarifications made to the covered
species mitigation measures proposed in the applicant's revised TU
MSHCP; to reflect information related to the final location of two
communication towers; to clarify the number of hunting cabins allowed
on covered lands; and to update various acreages associated with the
revised TU MSHCP. Where appropriate, we added information and required
mitigation measures associated with the TMV project approvals to the
Supplemental Draft EIS.
The no-action alternative, for the purposes of analysis, remains
the same as described in the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS and assumes
that the Ranchwide Agreement would remain in effect, that development
of the TMV project and other future commercial or residential
development allowed within the covered lands under the Ranchwide
Agreement would not occur, and that existing ranch uses would continue
at current levels into the future.
The condor-only HCP alternative generally remains the same as
described in the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS and continues to represent
a species management approach that addresses only the California
condor. Take of other federally listed species would be avoided under
this alternative through project-specific review and approvals, and by
siting development in a manner that avoids occurrences of the species.
Development and open space preservation would be consistent with those
elements described in the Proposed TU MSHCP Alternative. Plan-wide
activities would also be the same as those described in the proposed TU
MSHCP alternative, except that all management and mitigation elements
would be limited to California condor-related measures as set forth in
the proposed TU MSHCP alternative. Similarly, the conservation measures
and adaptive management elements of the condor-only HCP alternative
would be limited solely to those for the California condor set forth in
the proposed TU MSHCP alternative.
The condor critical habitat (CCH) avoidance MSHCP alternative
remains the same as described in the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS. Plan-
wide activities would continue and the proposed development areas avoid
federally designed critical habitat for California condor. Under this
alternative, no commercial or residential development would occur in
any designated critical habitat for California condor. The TMV project
would not occur, as that project would extend into California condor
critical habitat. Instead, development would follow Kern County General
Plan designations and would cluster most commercial and residential
development in the southwestern portion of the covered lands, in the
portion of the TMV planning area nearest to Interstate 5, and in other
areas outside condor critical habitat. The CCH avoidance MSHCP
alternative also assumes implementation of the Ranchwide Agreement,
where development boundaries outside critical habitat conform to the
development setbacks and general boundaries provided in that agreement.
The Kern County General Plan Buildout alternative remains the same
as presented in the 2011 Supplemental Draft EIS. While the Ranchwide
Agreement has resulted in the recordation of conservation easements on
12,795 acres of the covered lands (existing conservation easement
areas), the remainder of the covered lands to be precluded from
development under the Ranchwide Agreement do not currently have
conservation easements recorded. As noted above, because the Ranchwide
Agreement is a private agreement between parties, and Service is not a
party to and has no contractual standing under the agreement, the
agreement can be amended (or even terminated) by mutual agreement of
the parties such that the land preservation outcome of the Ranchwide
Agreement on covered lands may not be realized. While the Service
considers remote the likelihood that the Ranchwide Agreement would be
terminated, for purposes of comprehensive NEPA analysis, this
[[Page 65401]]
alternative does not assume continuation of the Ranchwide Agreement
except for the permanent protection of the already-recorded
conservation easements on the existing conservation easement lands.
Under the Kern County General Plan buildout alternative,
development is assumed to proceed in accordance with the Kern County
General Plan, including implementation of the TMV project (per the TMV
project approvals). Development of the covered lands would require
additional Kern County approval, and the EIS analysis assumes that
development would proceed on a project-by-project basis and that the
Service would issue incidental take authorization as appropriate
through either section 7 of the Act or the section 10 process under the
Act.
Public Involvement
We published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for a
California Condor Habitat Conservation Plan (Condor HCP) in the Federal
Register on June 25, 2004 (69 FR 35663). The NOI announced a
30[hyphen]day public scoping period that ended on July 26, 2004. On
March 26, 2008, a NOI to prepare an EIS for the TU MSHCP was published
in the Federal Register (73 FR 16052). The NOI announced a
30[hyphen]day public scoping period that ended on April 25, 2008. We
published a revised notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for this
project in the Federal Register on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 31876); this NOI
clarified the proposed action and corrected a posting error in the
March 2008 NOI. On February 4, 2009, we published a notice of
availability of the Draft Plan, EIS, and IA in the Federal Register (74
FR 6050). The Draft documents were initially available for a 90-day
public comment period, which was extended, with a Notice of a
60[hyphen]day Extension issued on May 5, 2009. On February 3, 2012, we
published a notice of availability of the Supplemental Draft EIS, Plan
and IA in the Federal Register (77 FR 5564). The Supplemental Draft
documents were available for a 90-day public comment period, which
concluded on May 3, 2012.
Public Review
Copies of the Final EIS, TU MSHCP, and IA are available for review
(see ADDRESSES). Any comments we receive will become part of the
administrative record and will be available to the public. Before
including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. If you wish us to withhold your
name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning
of your comment. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Decision
We will evaluate the application, associated documents, and
comments submitted to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act. A permit decision will be
made no sooner than 30 days after the publication of the Environmental
Protection Agency's notice of the EIS in the Federal Register and
completion of a Record of Decision.
This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(a) of the Act and
pursuant to implementing regulations for NEPA (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: October 16, 2012.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2012-26169 Filed 10-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P