Airworthiness Directives; Intertechnique Aircraft Systems, 65148-65150 [2012-26266]
Download as PDF
65148
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the relevant information in the general
revisions is identical to that in Airbus
Temporary Revision TR37, Issue 1.0, dated
June 15, 2010; or Airbus Temporary Revision
TR38, Issue 1.0, dated June 15, 2010.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1107; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–216–AD]
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9–
ANM–116–AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2012–
0069, dated April 24, 2012, and the service
information specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i)
and (i)(1)(ii) of this AD, for related
information.
(i) Airbus Temporary Revision TR37, Issue
1.0, dated June 15, 2010.
(ii) Airbus Temporary Revision TR38, Issue
1.0, dated June 15, 2010.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS—Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
14, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–26264 Filed 10–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:22 Oct 24, 2012
Jkt 229001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Airworthiness Directives;
Intertechnique Aircraft Systems
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to certain Intertechnique
Aircraft Systems oxygen mask
regulators. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report of a
malfunctioning mask having an
inflatable harness with a high premature
rupture rate due to defective silicon.
This proposed AD would require
inspecting and replacing defective
harnesses with new or modified
serviceable units. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct defective
harnesses which could lead, in case of
a sudden depressurization event, to a
harness rupture, thereby providing
inadequate protection against hypoxia
and possibly resulting in
unconsciousness of the affected
flightcrew member and consequent
reduced control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 10,
2012.
SUMMARY:
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact
Intertechnique Aircraft Systems, 61 Rue
Pierre Curie BP 1, 78373 Plaisir Cedex—
France; telephone: (33) 1 61 34 12 32;
fax: (33) 1 64 86 69 84; email:
yann.laine@zodiacaerospace.com;
Internet: www.zodiacaerospace.com.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caspar Wang, Aerospace Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO) ANE–150, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7799; fax: (781) 238–
7170; email: caspar.wang@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–1107; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–216–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0090R1,
dated July 13, 2011 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
A malfunction of a quick donning mask
was reported to Intertechnique, who initiated
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
an investigation in order to detect the root
cause and the failure mode. Despite the fact
that the analysis did not lead to any final
conclusion, discrete suspected silicon
batches have been identified which have
shown an unusually high premature rupture
rate.
Some of the affected harnesses are known
to have been delivered as spares.
Consequently, an inflatable harness
belonging to one of the suspect batches may
have become installed on an Oxygen Mask
Regulator, the serial number (s/n) or [part
number] P/N of which is not identified in
Appendix II of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin (SB) MXH–35–240.
This fact widens the Applicability of this
[EASA] AD to extend beyond the individual
Oxygen Mask Regulators identified by s/n
and P/N in Appendix II of the SB.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead, in case of a sudden
depressurization event, to a harness rupture,
thereby providing inadequate protection
against hypoxia of the affected flight crew
member, possibly resulting in
unconsciousness and consequent reduced
control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires the identification and
replacement of all potentially defective
harnesses with serviceable units.
Note 1: The affected batches were installed
on harnesses manufactured between
December 2008 and August 2010, having
dates codes 0850S (week 50 of 2008) through
1031S (week 31 of 2010).
Note 2: Harness assemblies that do not
have a batch code were manufactured before
week 33 of 2008 and are not affected by this
unsafe condition.
This [EASA] AD has been revised to
correct a typographical error in the
Applicability, which inadvertently referred
to P/N MA10–12 masks, whereas in fact, all
P/N MA10 series could have an affected
harness installed. In addition, this revised
AD corrects Note 2 (above), which confused
harness manufacturing date codes with the
affected harnesses batch codes.
This [EASA] AD is also revised to make
reference to the latest revisions of the
referenced Intertechnique service
publications which identify by s/n and P/N,
in Appendix II of the SB, more oxygen mask
regulators that are known or suspected to
have an affected harness installed. Finally,
this AD is revised to add a Note to the
Required Actions section, to stress the fact
that other oxygen mask regulators could be
affected, in addition to those listed in
Appendix II of the SB.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Zodiac Aerospace Intertechnique has
issued the following service bulletins:
• Intertechnique Service Bulletin
MXH–35–240, Revision 7, dated
September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes
other than Bombardier airplanes).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:22 Oct 24, 2012
Jkt 229001
• Intertechnique Service Bulletin
MXH–35–241, Revision 2, dated May
19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes).
The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect up to 5,500 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists
required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that
there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators up to $467,500, or $85 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65149
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Intertechnique Aircraft Systems: Docket No.
FAA–2012–1107; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–216–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December
10, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Intertechnique Aircraft
Systems flight crew oxygen mask regulators,
all part number (P/N) MA10, MC10, MC20,
MF10, MF20, MLC20, MLD20, MRA005,
MRA022, and MRA023 series; certificated in
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
65150
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
any category; installed on, but not limited to,
airplanes manufactured by Airbus, ATR, BAE
Systems (Type Certificate previously held by
British Aerospace), Boeing, Bombardier
(Type Certificate previously held by
Canadair, De Havilland Canada), Cessna,
Dassault, EADS CASA, EMBRAER,
Gulfstream, Hawker Beechcraft (Type
Certificate previously held by Raytheon,
Beech), Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI),
McDonnell Douglas, Piaggio, Pilatus, Piper
and SOCATA.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35: Oxygen.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of a
malfunctioning mask having an inflatable
harness with a high premature rupture rate
due to defective silicon. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct defective harnesses
which could lead, in case of a sudden
depressurization event, to a harness rupture,
thereby providing inadequate protection
against hypoxia and possibly resulting in
unconsciousness of the affected flightcrew
member and consequent reduced control of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Inspection
(1) Except as provided by paragraph (i) of
this AD: Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, inspect the inflatable harness
fitted to each flight crew oxygen mask
regulator to determine if the inflatable
harness is installed with a part number (P/N)
and a batch number identified in Appendix
I of Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–
35–240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011
(for all airplanes other than Bombardier
airplanes); or Appendix I of Intertechnique
Service Bulletin MXH–35–241, Revision 2,
dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier
airplanes).
(2) Referring only to Appendix II of
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–35–
240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011 (for
all airplanes other than Bombardier
airplanes); or Appendix II of Intertechnique
Service Bulletin MXH–35–241, Revision 2,
dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier
airplanes); to identify a specific oxygen mask
regulator is insufficient to demonstrate that
the inflatable harness fitted to that oxygen
mask regulator is not listed in Appendix I of
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–35–
240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011; or
Appendix I of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin MXH–35–241, Revision 2, dated
May 19, 2011.
(h) Replacement
If during the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, an inflatable
harness has a part number and batch number
identified in Appendix I of Intertechnique
Service Bulletin MXH–35–240, Revision 7,
dated September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes
other than Bombardier airplanes); or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:22 Oct 24, 2012
Jkt 229001
Appendix I of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin MXH–35–241, Revision 2, dated
May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes):
Before further flight, replace the inflatable
harness with a new or re-identified harness,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin MXH–35–240, Revision 7, dated
September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes other
than Bombardier airplanes); or
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–35–
241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011 (for
Bombardier airplanes).
(i) Exception
Oxygen mask regulators having a date of
manufacturing (DMF) code of November
2008 (112008 or 11–08) or earlier, and those
with a DMF of January 2011 (012011 or 01–
11) or later, are excluded from the inspection
and replacement requirements of paragraphs
(g) and (h) of this AD, provided it can be
demonstrated that the inflatable harness has
not been replaced on those masks. A review
of airplane delivery or maintenance records
is acceptable to make the determination as
specified in this paragraph if the part
number, batch number, and DMF can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(j) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, Bombardier
airplanes include airplanes previously
manufactured by Canadair or by De
Havilland Canada.
(k) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a flight crew oxygen mask
regulator having a part number and batch
number on the inflatable harness that is
found in Appendix I of Intertechnique
Service Bulletin MXH–35–240, Revision 7,
dated September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes
other than Bombardier airplanes); or
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–35–
241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011 (for
Bombardier airplanes) on any airplane.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using a service bulletin
specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), or (l)(3) of
this AD:
(1) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–
35–240, Revision 6, dated August 16, 2011.
(2) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–
35–240, Revision 5, dated July 26, 2011.
(3) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–
35–240, Revision 4, dated June 10, 2011.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO) ANE–150, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Caspar
Wang, Aerospace Engineer, Boston Aircraft
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Certification Office (ACO) ANE–150, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: (781) 238–7799; fax: (781)
238–7170. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(n) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0090R1, dated July 13, 2011,
and the service information specified in
paragraphs (n)(1)(i) and (n)(1)(ii) of this AD,
for related information.
(i) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–
35–240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011.
(ii) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH–
35–241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Intertechnique Aircraft
Systems, 61 Rue Pierre Curie BP 1, 78373
Plaisir Cedex—France; telephone: (33) 1 61
34 12 32; fax: (33) 1 64 86 69 84; email:
yann.laine@zodiacaerospace.com; Internet:
www.zodiacaerospace.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
15, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–26266 Filed 10–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FDA–2004–C–0559 (Formerly
Docket No. 2004C-0078)]
Cryovac North America; Withdrawal of
Color Additive Petition
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of withdrawal.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
withdrawal, without prejudice to a
future filing, of a color additive petition
(CAP 4C0276) proposing that the color
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 207 (Thursday, October 25, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65148-65150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1107; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-216-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Intertechnique Aircraft Systems
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to certain Intertechnique Aircraft Systems oxygen mask
regulators. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of a
malfunctioning mask having an inflatable harness with a high premature
rupture rate due to defective silicon. This proposed AD would require
inspecting and replacing defective harnesses with new or modified
serviceable units. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct
defective harnesses which could lead, in case of a sudden
depressurization event, to a harness rupture, thereby providing
inadequate protection against hypoxia and possibly resulting in
unconsciousness of the affected flightcrew member and consequent
reduced control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 10,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Intertechnique Aircraft Systems, 61 Rue Pierre Curie BP 1, 78373
Plaisir Cedex--France; telephone: (33) 1 61 34 12 32; fax: (33) 1 64 86
69 84; email: yann.laine@zodiacaerospace.com; Internet:
www.zodiacaerospace.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caspar Wang, Aerospace Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) ANE-150, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: (781) 238-7799; fax: (781) 238-7170; email:
caspar.wang@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-1107;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-216-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0090R1, dated July 13, 2011 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
A malfunction of a quick donning mask was reported to
Intertechnique, who initiated
[[Page 65149]]
an investigation in order to detect the root cause and the failure
mode. Despite the fact that the analysis did not lead to any final
conclusion, discrete suspected silicon batches have been identified
which have shown an unusually high premature rupture rate.
Some of the affected harnesses are known to have been delivered
as spares. Consequently, an inflatable harness belonging to one of
the suspect batches may have become installed on an Oxygen Mask
Regulator, the serial number (s/n) or [part number] P/N of which is
not identified in Appendix II of Intertechnique Service Bulletin
(SB) MXH-35-240.
This fact widens the Applicability of this [EASA] AD to extend
beyond the individual Oxygen Mask Regulators identified by s/n and
P/N in Appendix II of the SB.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead, in
case of a sudden depressurization event, to a harness rupture,
thereby providing inadequate protection against hypoxia of the
affected flight crew member, possibly resulting in unconsciousness
and consequent reduced control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires the
identification and replacement of all potentially defective
harnesses with serviceable units.
Note 1: The affected batches were installed on harnesses
manufactured between December 2008 and August 2010, having dates
codes 0850S (week 50 of 2008) through 1031S (week 31 of 2010).
Note 2: Harness assemblies that do not have a batch code were
manufactured before week 33 of 2008 and are not affected by this
unsafe condition.
This [EASA] AD has been revised to correct a typographical error
in the Applicability, which inadvertently referred to P/N MA10-12
masks, whereas in fact, all P/N MA10 series could have an affected
harness installed. In addition, this revised AD corrects Note 2
(above), which confused harness manufacturing date codes with the
affected harnesses batch codes.
This [EASA] AD is also revised to make reference to the latest
revisions of the referenced Intertechnique service publications
which identify by s/n and P/N, in Appendix II of the SB, more oxygen
mask regulators that are known or suspected to have an affected
harness installed. Finally, this AD is revised to add a Note to the
Required Actions section, to stress the fact that other oxygen mask
regulators could be affected, in addition to those listed in
Appendix II of the SB.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Zodiac Aerospace Intertechnique has issued the following service
bulletins:
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 7,
dated September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes other than Bombardier
airplanes).
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-241, Revision 2,
dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes).
The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect up to 5,500 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate
that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators up
to $467,500, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Intertechnique Aircraft Systems: Docket No. FAA-2012-1107;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-216-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December 10, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Intertechnique Aircraft Systems flight crew
oxygen mask regulators, all part number (P/N) MA10, MC10, MC20,
MF10, MF20, MLC20, MLD20, MRA005, MRA022, and MRA023 series;
certificated in
[[Page 65150]]
any category; installed on, but not limited to, airplanes
manufactured by Airbus, ATR, BAE Systems (Type Certificate
previously held by British Aerospace), Boeing, Bombardier (Type
Certificate previously held by Canadair, De Havilland Canada),
Cessna, Dassault, EADS CASA, EMBRAER, Gulfstream, Hawker Beechcraft
(Type Certificate previously held by Raytheon, Beech), Israel
Aircraft Industries (IAI), McDonnell Douglas, Piaggio, Pilatus,
Piper and SOCATA.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35: Oxygen.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of a malfunctioning mask having
an inflatable harness with a high premature rupture rate due to
defective silicon. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
defective harnesses which could lead, in case of a sudden
depressurization event, to a harness rupture, thereby providing
inadequate protection against hypoxia and possibly resulting in
unconsciousness of the affected flightcrew member and consequent
reduced control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Inspection
(1) Except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD: Within 24
months after the effective date of this AD, inspect the inflatable
harness fitted to each flight crew oxygen mask regulator to
determine if the inflatable harness is installed with a part number
(P[sol]N) and a batch number identified in Appendix I of
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 7, dated
September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes other than Bombardier
airplanes); or Appendix I of Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-
241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes).
(2) Referring only to Appendix II of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011 (for all
airplanes other than Bombardier airplanes); or Appendix II of
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-241, Revision 2, dated May
19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes); to identify a specific oxygen
mask regulator is insufficient to demonstrate that the inflatable
harness fitted to that oxygen mask regulator is not listed in
Appendix I of Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision
7, dated September 1, 2011; or Appendix I of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin MXH-35-241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011.
(h) Replacement
If during the inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD, an inflatable harness has a part number and batch number
identified in Appendix I of Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-
240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes other
than Bombardier airplanes); or Appendix I of Intertechnique Service
Bulletin MXH-35-241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier
airplanes): Before further flight, replace the inflatable harness
with a new or re-identified harness, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-
35-240, Revision 7, dated September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes other
than Bombardier airplanes); or Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-
35-241, Revision 2, dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes).
(i) Exception
Oxygen mask regulators having a date of manufacturing (DMF) code
of November 2008 (112008 or 11-08) or earlier, and those with a DMF
of January 2011 (012011 or 01-11) or later, are excluded from the
inspection and replacement requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, provided it can be demonstrated that the inflatable harness
has not been replaced on those masks. A review of airplane delivery
or maintenance records is acceptable to make the determination as
specified in this paragraph if the part number, batch number, and
DMF can be conclusively determined from that review.
(j) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, Bombardier airplanes include
airplanes previously manufactured by Canadair or by De Havilland
Canada.
(k) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
flight crew oxygen mask regulator having a part number and batch
number on the inflatable harness that is found in Appendix I of
Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 7, dated
September 1, 2011 (for all airplanes other than Bombardier
airplanes); or Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-241, Revision
2, dated May 19, 2011 (for Bombardier airplanes) on any airplane.
(l) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using a service bulletin specified in paragraph
(l)(1), (l)(2), or (l)(3) of this AD:
(1) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 6,
dated August 16, 2011.
(2) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 5,
dated July 26, 2011.
(3) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 4,
dated June 10, 2011.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) ANE-150, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Caspar Wang, Aerospace
Engineer, Boston Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) ANE-150, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) 238-7799; fax: (781) 238-7170.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(n) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0090R1,
dated July 13, 2011, and the service information specified in
paragraphs (n)(1)(i) and (n)(1)(ii) of this AD, for related
information.
(i) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-240, Revision 7,
dated September 1, 2011.
(ii) Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXH-35-241, Revision 2,
dated May 19, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Intertechnique Aircraft Systems, 61 Rue Pierre Curie BP 1, 78373
Plaisir Cedex--France; telephone: (33) 1 61 34 12 32; fax: (33) 1 64
86 69 84; email: yann.laine@zodiacaerospace.com; Internet:
www.zodiacaerospace.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 15, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-26266 Filed 10-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P