Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Carolina Beach, NC, 64904-64906 [2012-26155]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
64904
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
benefits, the Commission has denied
transmission planning regions the flexibility
it wisely acknowledged to be necessary with
respect to the zone issue. I agree with SPP
and OGE that we should provide that
flexibility.8
In Order No. 1000, the Commission
balanced many competing policy
considerations in an effort to adopt the
reforms necessary to assure just and
reasonable rates.9 This balance may be most
pronounced in the Commission’s efforts to
ensure that the regional planning process is
broad, inclusive, and fair, while at the same
time, mindful of the obligations and
attributes of incumbent transmission
providers. The Commission also went to
great lengths to provide transmissionplanning regions with the flexibility to
negotiate cost allocation methodologies that
allocate costs in a manner that they believe
is at least roughly commensurate with
benefits. Where the mutual achievement of
these objectives raises complex questions, as
it does with respect to whether any amount
of regional funding converts an otherwise
local reliability project in to a regional
project for purposes of the ROFR, the
Commission should decide the issue on
compliance, with a record, rather than by
establishing categorical rules that may
undermine the planning and cost allocation
goals Order No. 1000 was intended to
achieve.10
Accordingly, I respectfully dissent in part.
lllllllllllllllllllll
Cheryl A. LaFleur,
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2012–26111 Filed 10–23–12; 8:45 am]
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
8 In its request for clarification of Order 1000–A,
SPP seeks guidance on how to reconcile the
definitions and principles underlying Order No.
1000 with the Commission’s summary
determination in Order No. 1000–A that any
amount of regional funding for local reliability
projects requires elimination of the ROFR. See SPP
Request for Clarification at 7–16. Unlike my
colleagues, I believe that SPP’s filing may properly
be characterized as a request for clarification, and
therefore, should be addressed in this order.
However, I would not reach the merits of SPP’s
arguments. Instead, I would grant rehearing on the
grounds that the Commission should have deferred
deciding the issue until compliance and invite SPP
to make its arguments on compliance.
9 Order 1000–B at P 55.
10 See e.g. OGE Request for Rehearing at 6 (‘‘[T]he
broad definition of what constitutes regional cost
allocation would prohibit regional entities such as
SPP from adopting approaches they believe would
effectively allocate costs and fairly balance
stakeholder interests.’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:17 Oct 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0741]
A. Regulatory History and Information
On August 21, 2012, the Coast Guard
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (33 FR 50444). We
received no comments on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway; Carolina Beach, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway at Carolina Beach, North
Carolina. The safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of mariners on
navigable waters during maintenance on
the U.S. 421 Fixed Bridge crossing the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile
295.6, at Carolina Beach, North
Carolina. The safety zone will
temporarily restrict vessel movement
within the designated area starting on
December 20, 2012, through October 31,
2013.
DATES: This rule is effective from
December 20, 2012, until October 31,
2013.
SUMMARY:
Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2012–0741]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email CWO4 Joseph M. Edge, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone
252–247–4525, email
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
North Carolina Department of
Transportation has awarded a contract
to American Bridge Company of
Virginia Beach, Virginia to perform
bridge maintenance on the U.S. 421
Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 295.6, at
Carolina Beach, North Carolina. The
contract provides for cleaning, painting,
and steel repair to commence on
December 20, 2012 with a completion
date of October 31, 2013. The contractor
will utilize a 40 foot by 60 foot sectional
barge as a work platform and for
equipment staging. This safety zone will
provide a safety buffer to transiting
vessels as bridge repairs present
potential hazards to mariners and
property due to reduction horizontal
clearance. During this period the Coast
Guard will require a one hour
notification to the work supervisor for
passage through the U.S. 421 Fixed
Bridge along the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 295.6, Carolina Beach,
North Carolina. The bridge notification
requirement will apply during the
maintenance period for vessels
requiring a horizontal clearance of
greater than 60 feet.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
We received no comments on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
The temporary safety zone will
encompass the waters directly under the
U.S. 421 Fixed Bridge crossing the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile
295.6, at Carolina Beach, North Carolina
(34°03′21″ N, 077°53′58″ W). All vessels
transiting this section of the waterway
requiring a horizontal clearance of
greater than 60 feet will be required to
make a one hour advanced notification
to the work supervisor while the safety
zone is in effect. This zone will be in
effect from 8 a.m. December 20, 2012
through 8 p.m. October 31, 2013.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule does not restrict traffic
from transiting the designated portion of
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, it
imposes a one hour notification to
ensure the waterway is clear of
impediment to allow passage to vessels
requiring a horizontal clearance of
greater than 60 feet.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule affects the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
commercial tug and barge companies,
recreational and commercial fishing
vessels intending to transit the specified
portion of Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway from 8 a.m. December 20,
2012 through 8 p.m. October 31, 2013.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Although the
safety zone will apply to this section of
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
vessel traffic will be able to request
passage by providing a one hour
advanced notification to the work
supervisor. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories widely available to the users
of the waterway.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:17 Oct 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64905
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
64906
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
establishment of a temporary safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0741 to read as
follows:
■
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T05–0741 Safety Zone, Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway; Carolina Beach, NC.
(a) Regulated area. The following area
is a safety zone: This zone includes the
waters directly under and 100 yards
either side of the US 421 Fixed Bridge
crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 295.6, at Carolina
Beach, North Carolina (34°03′21″ N,
077°53′58″ W).
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.23 apply to the safety zone created
by this temporary section, § 165.T05–
0741. In addition the following
regulations apply:
(1) All vessels requiring greater than
60 feet horizontal clearance to safely
transit through the US 421 Fixed Bridge
crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 295.6, at Carolina
Beach, North Carolina must contact the
work supervisor tender on VHF–FM
marine band radio channels 13 and 16
or at (410) 320–9877 one hour in
advance of intended transit.
(2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio channels
13 and 16.
(3) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:17 Oct 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port
North Carolina means the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina or
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant
or petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port to act on his
behalf.
(2) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
North Carolina to assist in enforcing the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(3) Work Supervisor means the
contractor’s on site representative.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by Federal, State
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. December
20, 2012 through 8 p.m. October 31,
2013 unless cancelled earlier by the
Captain of the Port.
Dated: October 4, 2012.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012–26155 Filed 10–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
extension will temporarily restrict
vessel movement within the designated
area starting on December 12, 2012
through February 14, 2013.
DATES: This rule is effective from
December 12, 2012, through February
14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0812. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email CWO4 Joseph M. Edge, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone
252–247–4525, email
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0812]
RIN 1625–AA00
On September 17, 2012 the Coast
Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register (33 FR 57063) for this
rulemaking. We received no comments
in response to the NPRM. No public
meeting was requested, and none was
held.
B. Basis and Purpose
Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway; Emerald Isle, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is extending
the timeframe for a temporary safety
zone on the waters of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway at Emerald Isle,
North Carolina. The safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of
mariners on navigable waters during
maintenance of the NC 58 Fixed Bridge
crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 226, at Emerald Isle,
North Carolina. The safety zone
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
North Carolina Department of
Transportation has contracted Marine
Contracting Corporation of Virginia
Beach, Virginia to perform bridge
maintenance on the NC 58 Fixed Bridge
crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 226, at Emerald Isle,
North Carolina. The contract provides
for replacement of the fender system to
commence on September 12, 2012 with
a completion date of December 12, 2012.
The contractor has been granted an
extension by North Carolina Department
of Transportation until February 14,
2013 to complete the bridge
maintenance. The contractor will utilize
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 24, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64904-64906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26155]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0741]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Carolina Beach, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Carolina Beach, North
Carolina. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of
mariners on navigable waters during maintenance on the U.S. 421 Fixed
Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile 295.6, at
Carolina Beach, North Carolina. The safety zone will temporarily
restrict vessel movement within the designated area starting on
December 20, 2012, through October 31, 2013.
DATES: This rule is effective from December 20, 2012, until October 31,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0741]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email CWO4 Joseph M. Edge, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina; telephone 252-247-4525, email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On August 21, 2012, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (33 FR 50444). We received no comments on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
North Carolina Department of Transportation has awarded a contract
to American Bridge Company of Virginia Beach, Virginia to perform
bridge maintenance on the U.S. 421 Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 295.6, at Carolina Beach, North Carolina.
The contract provides for cleaning, painting, and steel repair to
commence on December 20, 2012 with a completion date of October 31,
2013. The contractor will utilize a 40 foot by 60 foot sectional barge
as a work platform and for equipment staging. This safety zone will
provide a safety buffer to transiting vessels as bridge repairs present
potential hazards to mariners and property due to reduction horizontal
clearance. During this period the Coast Guard will require a one hour
notification to the work supervisor for passage through the U.S. 421
Fixed Bridge along the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile 295.6,
Carolina Beach, North Carolina. The bridge notification requirement
will apply during the maintenance period for vessels requiring a
horizontal clearance of greater than 60 feet.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
The temporary safety zone will encompass the waters directly under
the U.S. 421 Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
mile 295.6, at Carolina Beach, North Carolina (34[deg]03'21'' N,
077[deg]53'58'' W). All vessels transiting this section of the waterway
requiring a horizontal clearance of greater than 60 feet will be
required to make a one hour advanced notification to the work
supervisor while the safety zone is in effect. This zone will be in
effect from 8 a.m. December 20, 2012 through 8 p.m. October 31, 2013.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
[[Page 64905]]
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule does not
restrict traffic from transiting the designated portion of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, it imposes a one hour notification to ensure the
waterway is clear of impediment to allow passage to vessels requiring a
horizontal clearance of greater than 60 feet.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule affects the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of commercial tug and barge
companies, recreational and commercial fishing vessels intending to
transit the specified portion of Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from 8
a.m. December 20, 2012 through 8 p.m. October 31, 2013.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
Although the safety zone will apply to this section of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, vessel traffic will be able to request passage
by providing a one hour advanced notification to the work supervisor.
Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories widely available to the users of the waterway.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
[[Page 64906]]
establishment of a temporary safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0741 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0741 Safety Zone, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway;
Carolina Beach, NC.
(a) Regulated area. The following area is a safety zone: This zone
includes the waters directly under and 100 yards either side of the US
421 Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, mile
295.6, at Carolina Beach, North Carolina (34[deg]03'21'' N,
077[deg]53'58'' W).
(b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.23 apply to the safety zone created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05-0741. In addition the following regulations apply:
(1) All vessels requiring greater than 60 feet horizontal clearance
to safely transit through the US 421 Fixed Bridge crossing the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 295.6, at Carolina Beach, North Carolina
must contact the work supervisor tender on VHF-FM marine band radio
channels 13 and 16 or at (410) 320-9877 one hour in advance of intended
transit.
(2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channels 13 and 16.
(3) The operator of any vessel within or in the immediate vicinity
of this safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port North Carolina means the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(2) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port North Carolina to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(3) Work Supervisor means the contractor's on site representative.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted by Federal,
State and local agencies in the patrol and enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
December 20, 2012 through 8 p.m. October 31, 2013 unless cancelled
earlier by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: October 4, 2012.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012-26155 Filed 10-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
