Confirmatory Order; In the Matter of Honeywell International Inc.; Metropolis, Illinois, 64831-64834 [2012-26052]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Notices
Burden on the Public: 1,810 total
hours.
Dated: October 15, 2012.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2012–26038 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
National Science Foundation published
notices in the Federal Register of a
permit application received. Permits
were issued on October 15, 2012 to:
Celia Lang Permit No. 2013–008
Celia Lang Permit No. 2013–019
Celia Lang Permit No. 2013–020
Larissa Min Permit No. 2013–021
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
[FR Doc. 2012–25991 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice of a permit modification
issued under the Antarctic Conservation
Act of 1978, Public Law 95–541.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
AGENCY:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permit modifications issued
under the Antarctic Conservation Act of
1978. This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office,
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
22, 2012, the National Science
Foundation published a notice in the
Federal Register of a permit
modification request received. The
permit modification was issued on
October 17, 2012 to:
David Ainley Permit No. 2011–002
Mod. #3
SUMMARY:
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–25990 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
National Science Foundation.
Notice of permits issued under
the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978,
Public Law 95–541.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permits issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office,
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
19, 2012, August 31, 2012, and
September 12, 2012, respectively, the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Advisory Committee for Mathematical
and Physical Sciences; Notice of
Meeting
In accordance with Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as
amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Advisory Committee (66).
Date/Time: November 8, 2012 1:00 p.m.–
5:00 p.m.; November 9, 2012 10:30 a.m.–2:30
p.m.
Place: National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230
Room 1235
Type of Meeting: Open.
Contact Person: Dr. Mark A. Suskin, Acting
Deputy Assistant Director, Directorate for
Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room
1005, National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
(703) 292–8807.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and
recommendations concerning NSF science
and education activities within the
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical
Sciences.
Agenda: Update on current status of
Directorate Report of MPS Advisory Working
Group on Expeditions in Education Meeting
of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS
Directorate Discussion of MPS Long-term
Planning Activities.
Summary Minutes: May be obtained from
the contact person listed above.
Dated: October 18, 2012.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–26059 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64831
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 40–3392; License No. SUB–526;
EA–12–157; NRC–2012–0244]
Confirmatory Order; In the Matter of
Honeywell International Inc.;
Metropolis, Illinois
I.
Honeywell International Inc.
(Honeywell or Licensee) is the holder of
Materials License No. SUB–526, issued
by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 40.
Originally issued on December 17, 1958,
the license has been renewed many
times, most recently on May 11, 2007.
The license authorizes the operation of
Honeywell’s Metropolis Works facility
in accordance with the conditions
specified therein. The facility is located
in Metropolis, Illinois.
II.
From May 21 through 24, 2012, an
NRC inspection was conducted at the
Metropolis Works facility pursuant to
NRC Temporary Instruction (TI) 2600/
015, ‘‘Evaluation of Licensee Strategies
for the Prevention and/or Mitigation of
Emergencies at Fuel Facilities.’’ The
objective of the TI inspection was to
independently verify that Honeywell is
adequately prepared to prevent and/or
mitigate the consequences of selected
safety/licensing basis events and to
evaluate the adequacy of those
emergency prevention and/or mitigation
strategies for dealing with the
consequences of selected beyond-safety/
licensing basis events. At the time of the
inspection, the Metropolis Works
facility had been shut down since May
9, 2012, for a planned maintenance
outage.
The inspection identified significant
concerns related to Honeywell’s
Uranium Hexafluoride (UF6) and
Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) source terms,
used as a basis for the Honeywell
Emergency Response Plan (ERP).
Specifically, the inspection identified
that the design of the process equipment
in the Feed Materials Building at the
Metropolis Works facility lacks seismic
restraints, supports, and bracing that
would assure process equipment
integrity during a credible seismic event
or tornado. Because the Metropolis
Works facility was shut down for a
planned maintenance outage, no
immediate safety concern existed. The
NRC concluded, however, that the
potential consequences of the
inspection findings were significant.
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
64832
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Notices
Specifically, when the Metropolis
Works facility was operating, the
amount of UF6 that could have been
released during a credible seismic event
or tornado was significantly larger than
that assumed in the development of the
facility’s ERP.
The inspection results were
documented in NRC Inspection Report
No. 40–3392/2012–006, issued on
August 9, 2012. At that time, the NRC
identified two apparent violations.
First, contrary to 10 CFR 40.31(j)(3),
on May 27, 2005, Honeywell submitted
an ERP that did not include an
identification of each type of accident
for which protective actions may be
needed. Specifically, the ERP submitted
by Honeywell did not identify accident
sequences related to credible seismic
and tornado events that could result in
large UF6 releases for which protective
actions may be needed.
Second, contrary to 10 CFR 40.9(a),
certain information Honeywell is
required to maintain by license
condition is not complete and accurate
in all material respects. Under License
Condition 18, Honeywell is required to
conduct authorized activities at the
Metropolis Work facility in accordance
with the statements, representation, and
conditions in its Integrated Safety
Analysis (ISA) Summary (License
Condition 18.D). The ISA Summary
states, in part, that ‘‘the plant is
designed to withstand the 475-yr
earthquake with no safety
implications.’’ The NRC’s May 2012
inspection identified, however, that the
ground motion associated with a 475-yr
earthquake would have safety
implications due to the design of the
Metropolis Works facility. This apparent
inaccuracy is material to the NRC
because it involves information the NRC
staff reasonably considers as part of its
oversight of Honeywell as a licensee.
Concurrent with ongoing NRC review
of the inspection results and to address
immediate Agency concerns, on July 13,
2012, the NRC issued a Confirmatory
Action Letter (CAL) to Honeywell. The
CAL confirmed commitments made by
Honeywell to ensure that, before
licensed operations resumed, the
Metropolis Works facility’s ERP would
be revised so that it is consistent with
design and operational limitations for
all potentially affected processes. This
Confirmatory Order will supersede the
CAL issued on July 13, 2012. This Order
provides the basis for Honeywell to
implement corrective actions prior to
resuming NRC licensed operations.
III.
The NRC concludes that significant
corrective actions at the Metropolis
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Work facility are necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of public health
and safety. The NRC further concludes
that formalizing the corrective actions
proposed by Honeywell necessitates the
issuance of this Confirmatory Order.
Consistent with Section 3.7 of the NRC’s
Enforcement Policy, the NRC is issuing
this Confirmatory Order in lieu of
issuance of a Notice of Violation and
consideration of civil penalties for the
apparent violations described above.
On October 11, 2012, Honeywell
consented to issuance of this Order with
the commitments described in Section
IV below. Honeywell further agreed that
this Order will be effective 30 days from
issuance and waived its right to a
hearing on this Order.
I find that the Licensee’s
commitments described in Section IV
are acceptable and necessary and
conclude that, with these commitments,
the Metropolis Works facility’s safety
and the safety of the public is
reasonably assured. In view of the
foregoing, I have determined that public
health and safety require that the
Licensee’s commitments be confirmed
by this Order. Based on the above and
the Licensee’s consent, this Order will
be effective 30 days from issuance.
Contingent upon the Licensee satisfying
its commitments under this Order, the
NRC will not pursue further
enforcement action based on the two
apparent violations described in Section
II of this Order.
IV.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 61,
63, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the Commission’s regulations in 10
CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 40, it is
hereby ordered that license no. SUB–
526 IS modified as follows:
1. Honeywell shall submit to the Director,
NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, the following documentation for
review:
a. An evaluation of external events at the
Metropolis Works facility that clearly defines
and provides the safety bases for:
i. Seismic and wind design;
ii. The structures, systems, or components
relied upon to protect workers and the public
during both intermediate and high
consequence events;
iii. The definitions of ‘‘intermediateconsequence event’’ and ‘‘high-consequence
event’’ for non-radiological releases; and
iv. The definitions of ‘‘unlikely’’ and
‘‘highly unlikely’’ for seismic and wind
events.
b. A revised ERP (License Condition 24)
that, consistent with the evaluation produced
in response to Item 1.a, defines all planning
bases and articulates all necessary
modifications to the Metropolis Works
facility.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
c. Documentation of the design bases for
the proposed modifications to the Metropolis
Works facility that will be needed to satisfy
Items 1.a and 1.b (e.g., design criteria,
engineering methodology, application of
Codes and Standards).
2. Honeywell shall develop, implement,
and have available for NRC inspection the
quality assurance measures for the
modifications referred to in Item 1.c. These
quality assurance measures shall address, at
a minimum, the following areas: design,
procurement, inspections and tests,
installation, document control, procedures
and drawings, and records.
3. Honeywell shall implement the
modifications referred to in Item 1.c before
seeking to resume NRC-licensed operations at
the Metropolis Works facility.
4. After Honeywell completes Items 1–3
and the NRC verifies the acceptability of the
facility modifications referred to in Item 1.c,
Honeywell may seek NRC approval to resume
licensed operations at the Metropolis Works
facility. Honeywell shall submit its request to
the NRC in writing at least 30 days before it
intends to resume licensed operations at the
Metropolis Works facility. Honeywell shall
not resume licensed operations until the NRC
grants its request in writing.
5. At least 15 days before resuming
licensed operations at the Metropolis Works
facility, Honeywell shall demonstrate the
adequacy of its revised ERP by conducting an
onsite exercise meeting the requirements in
10 CFR 40.31(j)(3)(xii).
6. Honeywell shall submit a revised ISA
Summary (License Condition 18.D) to the
NRC no later than six months after resuming
licensed operations at the Metropolis Works
facility.
The Regional Administrator, NRC
Region II, may relax or rescind, in
writing, any of the above conditions
upon a showing by Honeywell of good
cause.
V.
Any person adversely affected by this
Confirmatory Order, other than
Honeywell, may request a hearing
within 20 days of its publication in the
Federal Register. Where good cause is
shown, consideration will be given to
extending the time to request a hearing.
A request for extension of time must be
made in writing to the Regional
Administrator, Region II, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, 245 Peachtree
Center Avenue NE., Suite 1200, Atlanta,
GA, 30303–1257, and include a
statement of good cause for the
extension.
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave
to intervene, any motion or other
document filed in the proceeding prior
to the submission of a request for
hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested
governmental entities participating
under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Notices
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule
(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory
documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings
unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least ten
(10) days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone
at 301–415–1677, to request (1) a digital
ID certificate, which allows the
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and (2) advise the
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon
this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on
NRC’s public Web site at https://www.
nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/applycertificates.html. System requirements
for accessing the E-Submittal server are
detailed in NRC’s ‘‘Guidance for
Electronic Submission,’’ which is
available on the NRC’s public Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Participants may
attempt to use other software not listed
on the Web site, but should note that the
NRC’s E-Filing system does not support
unlisted software, and the NRC Meta
System Help Desk will not be able to
offer assistance in using unlisted
software.
If a participant is electronically
submitting a document to the NRC in
accordance with the E-Filing rule, the
participant must file the document
using the NRC’s online, Web-based
submission form. In order to serve
documents through the Electronic
Information Exchange System, users
will be required to install a Web
browser plug-in from the NRC Web site.
Further information on the Web-based
submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in,
is available on the NRC’s public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has
been created, the participant can then
submit a request for hearing or petition
for leave to intervene. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format
(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC’s public Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the documents are
submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing
system. To be timely, an electronic
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing
system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the agency’s adjudicatory E-Filing
system may seek assistance by
contacting the NRC Meta System Help
Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link
located on the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC
Meta System Help Desk is available
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing requesting authorization to
continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) First class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery
service to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64833
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service. A presiding
officer, having granted an exemption
request from using E-Filing, may require
a participant or party to use E-Filing if
the presiding officer subsequently
determines that the reason for granting
the exemption from use of E-Filing no
longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission,
or the presiding officer. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as Social
Security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
If a person (other than Honeywell)
requests a hearing, that person shall set
forth with particularity the manner in
which his interest is adversely affected
by this Confirmatory Order and shall
address the criteria set forth in 10 C.F.R.
2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order should
be sustained.
In the absence of any request for
hearing, or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
Section IV above shall be final 20 days
from the date this Confirmatory Order is
published in the Federal Register
without further order or proceedings. If
an extension of time for requesting a
hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in Section IV shall
be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received.
Dated this 15th day of October, 2012.
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
64834
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Victor M. McCree,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–26052 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2012–0250]
Computational Fluid Dynamics Best
Practice Guidelines for Dry Cask
Applications
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is requesting public comments on draft
NUREG–2152, ‘‘Computational Fluid
Dynamics Best Practice Guidelines for
Dry Cask Applications.’’ The draft
NUREG–2152 report provides best
practice guidelines for undertaking
simulations used to evaluate the thermal
response of dry casks. Dry cask
applications include transfer, transport,
and storage. First, the different sources
of errors and uncertainties known to
occur in numerical simulation results
are listed and defined. The sources of
error that can be controlled and
quantified by the user are then
discussed in detail, and best practice
guidelines for their reduction and
quantification are given. These best
practice guidelines are based on
available guidelines as much as
possible.
SUMMARY:
Comments may be submitted by
December 24, 2012. Comments received
after this date will be considered, if it
is practical to do so, but the
Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may access information
and comment submissions related to
this document, which the NRC
possesses and are publically available,
by searching on https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
NRC–2012–0250. You may submit
comments by any of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0250. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
• Fax comments to: RADB at 301–
492–3446.
For additional direction on accessing
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jorge Solis, Senior Thermal Engineer,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Washington, DC 20005–
0001; telephone: 301–492–3282; email:
Jorge.Solis@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2012–
0250 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information regarding
this document. You may access
information related to this document by
any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0250.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publiclyavailable documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this notice (if
that document is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that a
document is referenced. The draft
NUREG–2152 is located in ADAMS
under Accession Number
ML12286A301.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Please include Docket ID NRC–2012–
0250 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure
that the NRC is able to make your
comment submission available to the
public in this docket.
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Further Information
The purpose of this notice is to
provide the public with an opportunity
to review and solicit comments on the
draft NUREG–2152, ‘‘Computational
Fluid Dynamics Best Practice
Guidelines for Dry Cask Applications.’’
These comments will be considered in
the final version or subsequent
revisions.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16 day
of October, 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michele Sampson,
Chief, Thermal and Containment Branch,
Division of Spent Fuel Storage and
Transportation, Office of Nuclear Materials
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2012–26047 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–219; NRC–2009–0320]
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating
Station; Exemption
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of issuance; correction.
AGENCY:
This document corrects a
notice appearing in the Federal Register
on April 8, 2011 (76 FR 19795), that
incorrectly described Sections 3.9.2 and
3.18.2, ‘‘Detection, Control, and
Extinguishment.’’ This action is
necessary to correct erroneous
information.
SUMMARY:
B. Submitting Comments
PO 00000
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will posts all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS,
and the NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64831-64834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26052]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 40-3392; License No. SUB-526; EA-12-157; NRC-2012-0244]
Confirmatory Order; In the Matter of Honeywell International
Inc.; Metropolis, Illinois
I.
Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell or Licensee) is the holder
of Materials License No. SUB-526, issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 40. Originally issued on December 17,
1958, the license has been renewed many times, most recently on May 11,
2007. The license authorizes the operation of Honeywell's Metropolis
Works facility in accordance with the conditions specified therein. The
facility is located in Metropolis, Illinois.
II.
From May 21 through 24, 2012, an NRC inspection was conducted at
the Metropolis Works facility pursuant to NRC Temporary Instruction
(TI) 2600/015, ``Evaluation of Licensee Strategies for the Prevention
and/or Mitigation of Emergencies at Fuel Facilities.'' The objective of
the TI inspection was to independently verify that Honeywell is
adequately prepared to prevent and/or mitigate the consequences of
selected safety/licensing basis events and to evaluate the adequacy of
those emergency prevention and/or mitigation strategies for dealing
with the consequences of selected beyond-safety/licensing basis events.
At the time of the inspection, the Metropolis Works facility had been
shut down since May 9, 2012, for a planned maintenance outage.
The inspection identified significant concerns related to
Honeywell's Uranium Hexafluoride (UF6) and Hydrogen Fluoride
(HF) source terms, used as a basis for the Honeywell Emergency Response
Plan (ERP). Specifically, the inspection identified that the design of
the process equipment in the Feed Materials Building at the Metropolis
Works facility lacks seismic restraints, supports, and bracing that
would assure process equipment integrity during a credible seismic
event or tornado. Because the Metropolis Works facility was shut down
for a planned maintenance outage, no immediate safety concern existed.
The NRC concluded, however, that the potential consequences of the
inspection findings were significant.
[[Page 64832]]
Specifically, when the Metropolis Works facility was operating, the
amount of UF6 that could have been released during a
credible seismic event or tornado was significantly larger than that
assumed in the development of the facility's ERP.
The inspection results were documented in NRC Inspection Report No.
40-3392/2012-006, issued on August 9, 2012. At that time, the NRC
identified two apparent violations.
First, contrary to 10 CFR 40.31(j)(3), on May 27, 2005, Honeywell
submitted an ERP that did not include an identification of each type of
accident for which protective actions may be needed. Specifically, the
ERP submitted by Honeywell did not identify accident sequences related
to credible seismic and tornado events that could result in large
UF6 releases for which protective actions may be needed.
Second, contrary to 10 CFR 40.9(a), certain information Honeywell
is required to maintain by license condition is not complete and
accurate in all material respects. Under License Condition 18,
Honeywell is required to conduct authorized activities at the
Metropolis Work facility in accordance with the statements,
representation, and conditions in its Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA)
Summary (License Condition 18.D). The ISA Summary states, in part, that
``the plant is designed to withstand the 475-yr earthquake with no
safety implications.'' The NRC's May 2012 inspection identified,
however, that the ground motion associated with a 475-yr earthquake
would have safety implications due to the design of the Metropolis
Works facility. This apparent inaccuracy is material to the NRC because
it involves information the NRC staff reasonably considers as part of
its oversight of Honeywell as a licensee.
Concurrent with ongoing NRC review of the inspection results and to
address immediate Agency concerns, on July 13, 2012, the NRC issued a
Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) to Honeywell. The CAL confirmed
commitments made by Honeywell to ensure that, before licensed
operations resumed, the Metropolis Works facility's ERP would be
revised so that it is consistent with design and operational
limitations for all potentially affected processes. This Confirmatory
Order will supersede the CAL issued on July 13, 2012. This Order
provides the basis for Honeywell to implement corrective actions prior
to resuming NRC licensed operations.
III.
The NRC concludes that significant corrective actions at the
Metropolis Work facility are necessary to provide reasonable assurance
of public health and safety. The NRC further concludes that formalizing
the corrective actions proposed by Honeywell necessitates the issuance
of this Confirmatory Order. Consistent with Section 3.7 of the NRC's
Enforcement Policy, the NRC is issuing this Confirmatory Order in lieu
of issuance of a Notice of Violation and consideration of civil
penalties for the apparent violations described above.
On October 11, 2012, Honeywell consented to issuance of this Order
with the commitments described in Section IV below. Honeywell further
agreed that this Order will be effective 30 days from issuance and
waived its right to a hearing on this Order.
I find that the Licensee's commitments described in Section IV are
acceptable and necessary and conclude that, with these commitments, the
Metropolis Works facility's safety and the safety of the public is
reasonably assured. In view of the foregoing, I have determined that
public health and safety require that the Licensee's commitments be
confirmed by this Order. Based on the above and the Licensee's consent,
this Order will be effective 30 days from issuance. Contingent upon the
Licensee satisfying its commitments under this Order, the NRC will not
pursue further enforcement action based on the two apparent violations
described in Section II of this Order.
IV.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 61, 63, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and
186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 40, it is hereby ordered
that license no. SUB-526 IS modified as follows:
1. Honeywell shall submit to the Director, NRC Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, the following documentation for
review:
a. An evaluation of external events at the Metropolis Works
facility that clearly defines and provides the safety bases for:
i. Seismic and wind design;
ii. The structures, systems, or components relied upon to
protect workers and the public during both intermediate and high
consequence events;
iii. The definitions of ``intermediate-consequence event'' and
``high-consequence event'' for non-radiological releases; and
iv. The definitions of ``unlikely'' and ``highly unlikely'' for
seismic and wind events.
b. A revised ERP (License Condition 24) that, consistent with
the evaluation produced in response to Item 1.a, defines all
planning bases and articulates all necessary modifications to the
Metropolis Works facility.
c. Documentation of the design bases for the proposed
modifications to the Metropolis Works facility that will be needed
to satisfy Items 1.a and 1.b (e.g., design criteria, engineering
methodology, application of Codes and Standards).
2. Honeywell shall develop, implement, and have available for
NRC inspection the quality assurance measures for the modifications
referred to in Item 1.c. These quality assurance measures shall
address, at a minimum, the following areas: design, procurement,
inspections and tests, installation, document control, procedures
and drawings, and records.
3. Honeywell shall implement the modifications referred to in
Item 1.c before seeking to resume NRC-licensed operations at the
Metropolis Works facility.
4. After Honeywell completes Items 1-3 and the NRC verifies the
acceptability of the facility modifications referred to in Item 1.c,
Honeywell may seek NRC approval to resume licensed operations at the
Metropolis Works facility. Honeywell shall submit its request to the
NRC in writing at least 30 days before it intends to resume licensed
operations at the Metropolis Works facility. Honeywell shall not
resume licensed operations until the NRC grants its request in
writing.
5. At least 15 days before resuming licensed operations at the
Metropolis Works facility, Honeywell shall demonstrate the adequacy
of its revised ERP by conducting an onsite exercise meeting the
requirements in 10 CFR 40.31(j)(3)(xii).
6. Honeywell shall submit a revised ISA Summary (License
Condition 18.D) to the NRC no later than six months after resuming
licensed operations at the Metropolis Works facility.
The Regional Administrator, NRC Region II, may relax or rescind, in
writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Honeywell of
good cause.
V.
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other
than Honeywell, may request a hearing within 20 days of its publication
in the Federal Register. Where good cause is shown, consideration will
be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for
extension of time must be made in writing to the Regional
Administrator, Region II, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 245
Peachtree Center Avenue NE., Suite 1200, Atlanta, GA, 30303-1257, and
include a statement of good cause for the extension.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in
[[Page 64833]]
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007).
The E-Filing process requires participants to submit and serve all
adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some cases to mail
copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper
copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in accordance
with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least
ten (10) days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should
contact the Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov,
or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) a digital ID
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a request or
petition for hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or
its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID
certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish
an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing
the E-Submittal server are detailed in NRC's ``Guidance for Electronic
Submission,'' which is available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may attempt to
use other software not listed on the Web site, but should note that the
NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC
Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance in using
unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System,
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form,
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on
the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others
who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-7640. The
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for
serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered
complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing
the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer,
having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to
include personal privacy information, such as Social Security numbers,
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted
materials in their submission.
If a person (other than Honeywell) requests a hearing, that person
shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is
adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order and shall address the
criteria set forth in 10 C.F.R. 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely
affected, the Commission will issue an order designating the time and
place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered
at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be
sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date this
Confirmatory Order is published in the Federal Register without further
order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing
has been approved, the provisions specified in Section IV shall be
final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been
received.
Dated this 15th day of October, 2012.
[[Page 64834]]
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Victor M. McCree,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-26052 Filed 10-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P