National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Torch Lake Superfund Site, 64748-64755 [2012-25968]
Download as PDF
64748
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES—Continued
Name of SIP provision
*
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
*
State submittal date
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Explanation
*
*
445B.500 .........................................
Establishment and administration of
program; contents of program;
designation of air pollution control
agency of county for purposes of
federal act; powers and duties of
local air pollution control board;
notice of public hearings; delegation of authority to determine violations and levy administrative
penalties; cities and smaller
counties; regulation of certain
electric plants prohibited.
8/30/12
[Insert Federal Register page number where the document begins]
10/23/12.
Submitted in attachment B to
NDEP’s August 30, 2012 SIP revision submittal. (Nevada Revised Statutes, Volume 28, 2011,
as published by the Legislative
Counsel, State of Nevada, section 445B.500).
445B.503 .........................................
Local air pollution control board in
county whose population is
700,000 or more: Cooperation
with regional planning coalition
and regional transportation commission; prerequisites to adoption
or amendment of plan, policy or
program.
8/30/12
[Insert Federal Register page number where the document begins]
10/23/12].
Submitted in attachment B, and as
an exhibit to attachment D, to
NDEP’s August 30, 2012 SIP revision submittal. (Nevada Revised Statutes, Volume 28, 2011,
as published by the Legislative
Counsel, State of Nevada, section 445B.503).
*
*
*
3. Section 52.1472 is amended by
adding paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) to
read as follows:
*
110(a)(2)(F) for the Clark County portion
of the Nevada SIP.
■
§ 52.1472
*
[FR Doc. 2012–25558 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Approval status.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS: The
SIPs submitted on February 1, 2008 and
August 30, 2012 are partially
disapproved for Clean Air Act (CAA)
elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(ii), (J) and (K)
for the Nevada Division of
Environmental Quality (NDEP) and
Washoe County portions of the Nevada
SIP; and for CAA element 110(a)(2)(F)
for the Clark County portion of the
Nevada SIP.
(e) 1997 P2.5 NAAQS: The SIPs
submitted on February 26, 2008 and
August 30, 2012 are partially
disapproved for CAA elements
110(a)(2)(C), (D)(ii), (J) and (K) for the
NDEP and Washoe County portions of
the Nevada SIP; and for CAA element
110(a)(2)(F) for the Clark County portion
of the Nevada SIP.
(f) 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: The SIPs
submitted on September 15, 2009,
December 4, 2009, and August 30, 2012
are partially disapproved for CAA
elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II) (interfere
with measures in any other state to
prevent significant deterioration of air
quality), (D)(ii), (J) and (K) for the NDEP
and Washoe County portions of the
Nevada SIP; for CAA element
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the NDEP, Washoe
County, and Clark County portions of
the Nevada SIP; and for CAA element
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–0005; FRL–9743–1]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the
Torch Lake Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 5 is
publishing a Direct Final Notice of
Deletion of the Isle Royale Tailings and
Michigan Smelter Tailing parcels of
Operable Unit 3 (OU3), and the Mason
Sands Tailings parcel of Operable Unit
1 (OU1) of the Torch Lake Superfund
Site (Site), located in Houghton County,
Michigan from the National Priorities
List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to Section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix to the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final partial deletion is being published
by EPA, with the concurrence of the
State of Michigan through the Michigan
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ), because EPA has determined
that all appropriate response actions
under CERCLA at these identified
parcels have been completed. However,
this partial deletion does not preclude
future actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to the
surface tailings, drums, and slag piles of
Isle Royale Tailings and Michigan
Smelter Tailings parcels of OU3 and the
Mason Sands Tailings parcel of OU1.
The following land parcels will remain
on the NPL and are not being
considered for deletion as part of this
action: Dollar Bay, Point Mills, Calumet
Lake Tailing, Boston Pond Tailing,
North Entry and Quincy Smelter.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion
is effective December 24, 2012 unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2012. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final partial deletion in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1986–0005, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: Nefertiti DiCosmo, Remedial
Project Manager, at
dicosmo.nefertiti@epa.gov
• Email: Dave Novak, Community
Involvement Coordinator, at
novak.dave@epa.gov
• Fax: Gladys Beard, NPL Deletion
Process Manager, at (312) 886–2077.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
• Mail: Nefertiti DiCosmo, Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (SR–6J), 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604,
(312) 886–6148, or Dave Novak,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886–7478 or 1–
800–621–8431.
• Hand deliver: Dave Novak,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–
0005. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
Regional Office, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency—Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL,
60604, Hours: Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
Lake Linden/Hubbell Public Library,
601 Calumet Street, Lake Linden, MI
49945, (906) 296–0698, Hours:
Monday through Friday 8:00am to
4:00 p.m., Tuesday and Thursday 6:00
p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Portage Lake District Library, 105
Huron, Houghton, MI 49931, (906)
482–4570, Hours: Monday, Tuesday
and Thursday 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.,
Wednesday and Friday 10:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., and Saturday 12:00 p.m. to
5:00 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nefertiti DiCosmo, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (SR–6J), 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, (312)
886–4737, dicosmo.nefertiti@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 5 is publishing this Direct
Final Notice of Deletion of the Isle
Royale Tailings and Michigan Smelter
Tailings parcels of OU3, and Mason
Sands Tailings parcel of OU1 of the
Torch Lake Superfund (Site) from the
NPL and requests public comments on
this action. The NPL constitutes
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), which EPA promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
sites that appear to present a significant
risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). This partial deletion of the
Torch Lake Superfund Site is proposed
in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e)
and is consistent with the Notice of
Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites
Listed on the National Priorities List (60
FR 55466) on November 1, 1995. As
described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP,
sites deleted from the NPL remain
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64749
eligible for Fund-financed remedial
actions if future conditions warrant
such actions.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, this
action will be effective December 24,
2012 unless EPA receives adverse
comments by November 23, 2012. Along
with this Direct Final Notice of Partial
Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of the Federal
Register. If adverse comments are
received within the 30-day public
comment period on this partial deletion
action, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of this direct final Notice for
Partial Deletion before the effective date
of the partial deletion, and the deletion
may not take effect. Alternatively EPA
may, as appropriate, prepare a response
to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and
the comments already received. In this
case, there will be no additional
opportunity to comment on the agency’s
response.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the Isle Royale Tailings and
Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of
OU3 and the Mason Sands Tailings
parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site and demonstrates how
the deletion criteria are met at these
land parcels. Section V discusses EPA’s
action to partially delete the Site parcels
from the NPL unless adverse comments
are received during the public comment
period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
64750
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c)
and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year
reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts
such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. EPA may initiate
further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new
information becomes available that
indicates it is appropriate. Whenever
there is a significant release from a site
deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without
application of the hazard ranking
system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Isle Royale Tailings and
Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of
OU3, and the Mason Sands Tailings
parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the State of
Michigan prior to developing this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion and the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion copublished today in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of the Federal Register.
(2) EPA has provided the State 30
working days for review of this Direct
Final Notice of Partial Deletion and the
parallel Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion prior to their publication
today, and the State, through MDEQ,
has concurred on the partial deletion of
the Site from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication
of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion, a notice of the availability of
the parallel Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion is being published in the Daily
Mining Gazette Newspaper, located in
Houghton, Michigan. The newspaper
notice announces the 30-day public
comment period concerning the Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site
from the NPL. A public meeting will be
held prior to the end of the comment
period to ensure the public understands
the delisting process and the locations
of the land parcels proposed for
deletion.
(4) EPA placed copies of documents
supporting the proposed partial deletion
in the deletion docket and made these
items available for public inspection
and copying at the Site information
repositories.
(5) If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this partial deletion action,
EPA will publish a timely notice of
withdrawal of this Direct Final Notice of
Partial Deletion before its effective date
and will prepare a response to
comments. EPA may continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and
the comments already received.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
alter EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a site
from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the Isle
Royale Tailings and Michigan Smelter
Tailings parcels of OU3 and Mason
Sands Tailings parcel of OU1 of the
Torch Lake Superfund Site from the
NPL. The Isle Royale Tailings area
comprises approximately 64 acres of
cover material northwest of U.S. 41,
next to Portage Lake. It is located near
the town of Houghton, in the
northwestern corner of Section 5 in
Portage Township, Michigan (Township
54 N Range 33 W). The Torch Lake
Superfund Site Isle Royale Tailings
property parcel is also referred to as Isle
Royale Stamp Mill or Isle Royale Sands.
It is the parcel of property on the west
side of Houghton that was part of a mine
rock crushing operation. The Site has no
relation to the Isle Royale that is the
island located in Lake Superior.
A legal description of the Isle Royale
Tailings portion of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site is as follows: A parcel of
land in Government Lot 2, Section 5,
T54N, R33W, City of Houghton,
Houghton County, Michigan.
Commencing at the West 1⁄4 corner of
said Section 5; thence North 1069.47
feet; thence East 1584.79 feet to the
point of beginning on the Northeasterly
right-of-way of the Soo Line Railroad;
thence N 33° 42′ 20″ E 229.36 feet to the
South right-of-way (66-ft. R/W) of Carlos
Street of the recorded plat of Royale Isle
Subdivision; thence S 56° 17′40″ E
380.00 feet along said Carlos Street
right-of-way and extension thereof;
thence S 33° 42′ 20″ W 250.29 feet to the
Northeasterly right-of-way of said Soo
railroad; thence along said right-of-way
on a curve to the right N 53° 08′ 19″ W
380.68 feet more or less to the point of
beginning.
The Michigan Smelter Tailings parcel
is located in a 15-acre, low-lying area of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
stamp sands east of Houghton Canal
Road on the shores of Portage Lake, in
Sections 28, 33, and 34 of Adams/
Stanton Township, Michigan (55 N
Range 34 W). There is a piece of
property nearby, on the west side of
Houghton Canal Road, known as
Michigan Smelter that includes the
buildings and abandoned materials
where industrial activities took place.
This property is not part of the Torch
Lake Superfund Site and was not
investigated or remediated as part of the
Site activities. There may be high levels
of arsenic or other contaminants
associated with past mining activity in
that area, but such contamination would
not be considered as part of the Torch
Lake Superfund Site.
The legal description of the Michigan
Smelter Tailings portion of the Torch
Lake Superfund Site is as follows—
Parcel 1: Section 33, T55N, R34W,
Adams Township, Houghton County,
Michigan, Government Lot 1 lying
North of County Road 554, except
commencing at the North 1⁄4 corner;
thence South 320 feet to P.O.B.; thence
Southeasterly 90.18 feet; thence
Northeasterly 569.59 feet; thence North
202.57 feet; thence Southeasterly 410.48
feet to South right of way of Canal Road;
thence Southeasterly along Canal Road
888 feet more or less; thence South 676
feet to South line of Government Lot 1;
thence Southwesterly 1692 feet to the
West line of Government Lot 1; thence
North 980.78 feet to P.O.B. Parcel 2:
Section 34, T55N, R34W, Adams
Township, Houghton County, Michigan,
Government Lot 3 lying North of County
Road 554, also West 121.90 feet of
Government Lot 4 lying North of County
Road 554. Parcel 3: Section 28, T55N,
R34W, Stanton Township, Houghton
County, Michigan, part of Government
Lot 4, commencing North 00° 34′ 31″
West 35.08 feet from South 1; Corner;
thence North 00° 34′ 31″ West 1252.70
feet; thence south 89° 33′ 12″ East
102.60 feet; thence South 89° 35′ 56″
East 151.39 feet to shore; thence South
46° 13′ 52″ East 804.26 feet; thence
South 55° 13′ 38″ East 1279.14 ; thence
West 713.78 feet; thence North 46° 48′
32″ West 766.52 feet; thence South 43°
09′ 07″ West 66 feet; thence South 01°
45′ 30″ East 57.69 feet; thence South 08°
31′ 32″ West 141.99 feet; thence South
10° 03′ 39″ West 69.72 feet; thence
South 71° 33′ 12″ West 552.04 feet to
P.O.B.
The Mason Sands Tailings area is
about 225 acres and is located within a
fenced in area south of M–26 and
expands until the land meets the lake
(Torch Lake). It is adjacent to the Village
of Mason and is located in Sections 23,
26, and 27 of Township 55 North, Range
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
33 West. Located within the Mason
Sands parcel of the Site are dilapidated
industrial structures, building
foundations, and other debris. These
abandoned structures, foundations and
debris are not part of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site and were not
investigated or remediated. The surface
tailings at this Mason area constitute the
area addressed by the Torch Lake Site
remedial action. The legal description of
the Mason Sands portion of the Torch
Lake Superfund Site is as follows.
Government. Lot 2—Section 14—
T.55N–R.33 W lying East of State
Highway M–26 Right-of-Way, except as
follows: Commencing at a point on
shore of Torch Lake 500′ from meander
post on line between Sections 13 & 14,
thence N.55°40′ West to North boundary
line of Lot 2 Section 14, thence East
along North boundary of said Lot 2 to
shore of Torch Lake, thence
Southwesterly along said lake to Point
of Beginning except Right-of-Way of
C&H RR. 53.32.A. Gov’t. Lots 1, 2, 3, and
4—Section 23—T.55 N.–R.33 W. lying
East of abandoned railroad Right-ofWay, except as follows: Part of
Government Lot 4, Section 23, and
Government Lot 5, Section 26, T.55N,
R.33W, Osceola Township, Houghton
County, Michigan, more particularly
described as follows: Commencing at a
section corner common to Sections 22,
23, 26 and 27, T.55N, R.33W; then due
South 480.66 feet to the point of
beginning: thence N43° 54′ 04″ E
1164.53 feet; thence S51° 08′ 38″E
124.89 feet to a point located in the
Northwesterly right-of-way line of State
Highway M–26; thence S00° 02′ 18’’ W
112.29 feet to a point located in the
Southeasterly right-of-way line of State
Highway M–26; thence S50° 16′ 58″ E
21.89 feet; thence S35° 39′ 41″ E 251.20
feet; thence S32° 31′ 34″ W 189.24 feet;
thence N55° 59′ 01″ W 158.27 feet;
thence N58° 48′ 17″ W 75.02 feet to a
point located in the Northwesterly rightof-way line of an abandoned railroad;
thence S32° 31′ 34″ W 44.66 feet along
said Northwesterly right-of-way line of
an abandoned railroad; thence on a
curve to the right, having a radius of
2814.93 feet a long chord bearing and
distance of S39° 15′ 17″ W 659.63 feet,
661.15 feet along said Northwesterly
right-of-way line of an abandoned
railroad; thence continuing along said
abandoned railroad right-of-way S45°
59′ 00″ W 458.12 feet; thence due North
468.57 feet to the point of beginning,
containing 461,453 square feet, which is
10.59 acres including road right-ofways. Government. Lot 5—Section 26—
T.55N–R.33W. lying East of abandoned
railroad Right-of-Way, except as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Part of Government Lot 4, Section 23,
and Government Lot 5, Section 26,
T.55N, R.33W., Osceola Township,
Houghton County, Michigan, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a section corner
common to Sections 22, 23, 26, and 27,
T.55N, R.33W.; then due South 480.66
feet to the point of beginning: thence
N43° 54′ 04″ E 1164.53 feet; thence S51°
08′ 38″ E 124.89 feet to a point located
in the Northwesterly right-of-way line of
State Highway M–26; thence S00° 02′
18″ W 112.29 feet to a point located in
the Southeasterly right-of-way line of
State Highway M–26; thence S50° 16′
58″ E 21.89 feet; thence S35° 39′ 41″ E
251.20 feet; thence S32° 31′ 34″ W
189.24 feet; thence N55° 59′ 01″ W
158.27 feet; thence N58° 48′ 17″ W 75.02
feet to a point located in the
Northwesterly right-of-way line of an
abandoned railroad; thence S32° 31′ 34″
W 44.66 feet along said Northwesterly
right-of-way line of an abandoned
railroad; thence on a curve to the right,
having a radius of 2814.93 feet a long
chord bearing and distance of S39° 15′
17″ W 659.63 feet, 661.15 feet along said
Northwesterly right-of-way line of an
abandoned railroad; thence continuing
along said abandoned railroad right-ofway S45° 59′ 00″ W 458.12 feet; thence
due North 468.57 feet to the point of
beginning, containing 461,453 square
feet, which is 10.59 acres including road
right-of-ways. Government Lot 1—
Section 27—T.55N–R.33W lying east of
abandoned railroad Right-of-Way. That
portion of Government Lot 2—Section
27—T.55N–R.33W lying in the West 1⁄2
of the Southwest 1⁄4 of said Section. It
being understood and intended that the
above described land extends to the
waters edge of Torch Lake and to
include any tailing sands and slag that
may have accreted to said land, or to
other lands in Section 26—T.55N.—
R.33W.
Site Background and History
Site Location
The Site is located on the Keweenaw
Peninsula in Houghton County,
Michigan. The Site (CERCLIS ID
MID980901946) includes Torch Lake,
the northern portion of Portage Lake,
and the northern entry of Torch Lake.
The following areas were selected for
remedial measures and thus became
part of the Site: defined areas of stamp
sands, tailing piles, and slag materials
along the shore of and in the vicinity of
Torch Lake, Northern Portage Lake,
Keweenaw Waterway, Lake Superior,
Boston Pond, Calumet Lake, Lake
Linden, Hubbell/Tamarack City, Mason,
Calumet Lake, Michigan Smelter, Isle
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64751
Royale, Gross Point, and Quincy
Smelter. These defined areas were not
investigated at depth and were defined
as part of the Torch Lake Superfund Site
the surficial materials (stamp sands,
tailings, and slag) on these areas and
their relative locations to the Torch Lake
water body. These areas cover over 600
acres. During the Site investigation,
samples were taken of the surface (0–6
inches) and shallow subsurface (0–3
feet) stamp sands, tailings, and slag
piles at the frequency of approximately
one composite sample per 20 acreparcel. Data generated reflected similar
chemical characteristics in all samples
collected. This data was sufficient to
assume homogeneity of these materials
and to support selection of the Site’s
remedial action.
The remedial action included the
installation of a soil vegetative cover
over these defined areas of stamp sands,
tailings, and slag in order to meet the
Site Remedial Action Objectives
(RAOs). The remedial action only
addressed surfurce materials associated
with the covered land parcels. There
may be non-Site related contamination
with depth or in the vicinity of these
defined areas of stamp sands, tailings,
and slag that are not addressed by this
Site remedial action (i.e., vegetative
cover). This potential contamination
was not evaluated or addressed as part
of the remedial measures for the Torch
Lake Superfund Site. Non-Site related
contamination, if identified in the
future, will not be addressed by a
subsequent action as part of the Torch
Lake Superfund Site’s remedial action.
Site History
Torch Lake was the site of copper
milling and smelting facilities and
operations for over 100 years. Torch
Lake was a repository of milling wastes,
and served as the waterway
transportation to support the mining
industry. The first mill opened on Torch
Lake in 1868. At the mills, copper was
extracted by crushing or stamping the
rock into smaller pieces and driving
them through successively smaller
meshes. The copper and crushed rocks
were separated by gravimetric sorting in
a liquid medium. The copper was sent
to a smelter. The crushed rock particles,
called tailings, were discarded along
with mill processing water, typically by
pumping them into the Lake.
Mining output, milling activity, and
tailing production peaked in the
Keweenaw Peninsula in the early 1900s
to 1920. All of the mills at Torch Lake
were located on the west shore of the
Lake and many other mining mills and
smelters were located throughout the
Keweenaw Peninsula. In the early
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
64752
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
1900s, advances in technology allowed
recovery of copper from tailings
previously deposited in Torch Lake.
Dredges were used to collect submerged
tailings which were then screened,
recrushed, and gravity separated. An
ammonia leaching process involving
cupric ammonium carbonate was used
to recover copper and other metals from
conglomerate tailings. During the 1920s,
chemical reagents were used to further
increase the efficiency of reclamation.
The chemical reagents included lime,
pyridine oil, coal tar creosotes, wood
creosote, pine oil, and xanthates. After
reclamation activities were complete,
chemically treated tailings were
returned to the lake. In the 1930s and
1940s, the Torch Lake mills operated
mainly to recover tailings in Torch Lake.
In the 1950s, copper mills were still
active; but by the late 1960s, copper
milling had ceased.
Over 5 million tons of native copper
was produced from the Keweenaw
Peninsula and more than half of this
was processed along the shores of Torch
Lake. Between 1868 and 1968,
approximately 200 million tons of
tailings were dumped into Torch Lake
filling at least 20 percent of the Lake’s
original volume.
In June 1972, a discharge of 27,000
gallons of cupric ammonium carbonate
leaching liquor occurred into the north
end of Torch Lake from the storage vats
at the Lake Linden Leaching Plant. The
Michigan Water Resources Commission
(MWRC) investigated the spill. The 1973
MWRC report discerned no deleterious
effects associated with the spill, but did
observe discoloration of several acres of
the lake bottom indicating previous
discharges. In the 1970s, environmental
concern developed regarding the
century-long deposition of tailings into
Torch Lake. High concentrations of
copper and other heavy metals in Torch
Lake sediments, toxic discharges into
the Lake, and fish abnormalities
prompted many investigations into long
and short-term impacts attributed to
mine waste disposal. The International
Joint Commission’s Water Quality Board
designated the Torch Lake basin as a
Great Lakes Area of Concern (AOC) in
1983. Also in 1983, the Michigan
Department of Public Health announced
an advisory against the consumption of
Torch Lake sauger and walleye fish due
to tumors of unknown origin.
The Torch Lake Site was proposed for
inclusion on the National Priorities List
(NPL) in October of 1984, Federal
Register (49 FR 40320). The Site was
placed on the NPL in June 1986, (51
FR21054). The Torch Lake Site is also
on the list of sites identified under
Michigan’s Natural Resources and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Environmental Protection Act 451 Part
201. Residential use is planned for these
land parcels after they are deleted from
the NPL.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI/FS)
On May 9, 1988 Special Notice Letters
were issued to Universal Oil Products
and Quincy Mining Company to
perform a Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study (RI/FS). Universal Oil
Products was the successor corporation
of Calumet Hecla Mining Company
which operated its milling and smelting
on the shore of Lake Linden and
disposed the generated tailings in the
area. On June 13, 1988 a Notice Letter
was issued to Quincy Development
Company, which was the current owner
of a tailing pile located on the Lake
shore of Mason City. Negotiations for
the RI/FS Consent Order with these
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
were not successful due to issues such
as the extent of the Site, and the number
of PRPs. Subsequently, EPA contracted
with Donohue & Associates in
November 1988 to perform the RI/FS at
the Site.
On June 21, 1989 EPA collected a
total of eight samples from drums
located in the Old Calumet and Hecla
Smelting Mill Site near Lake Linden, the
Ahmeek Mill Site near Hubbell City,
and the Quincy Site near Mason. On
August 1, 1990 nine more samples were
collected from drums located above the
Tamarack Site near Tamarack City.
Based on the results of these samples,
EPA determined that some of these
drums may have contained hazardous
substances. During the week of May 8,
1989 EPA also conducted ground
penetrating radar and a sub bottom
profile (seismic) survey of the bottom of
Torch Lake. The area in which this
survey was conducted is immediately
off-shore from the Old Calumet and
Hecla Smelting Mill Site. The survey
located several point targets (possibly
drums) on the bottom of Torch Lake.
Due to the size and complex nature of
the Site, six OUs have been defined for
the Site. OU1, OU2 and OU3 are the
remedial OUs; and OU4, OU5 and OU6
are the removal OUs. OU1 includes
surface tailings, drums, and slag piles
on the western shore of Torch Lake.
Approximately 500 acres of tailings
were previously exposed surficially in
OU1. The Hubbell/Tamarack Tailings,
the Lake Linden Tailings and Mason
Sands parcels are included in OU1. OU2
includes groundwater, surface water,
submerged tailings and sediment in
Torch Lake, Portage Lake, the Portage
channel, and other surface water bodies
at the Site. OU3 includes the North
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Entry of Lake Superior Tailings,
Michigan Smelter Tailings, Quincy
Smelter Tailings, Calumet Lake Tailings,
Isle Royale Tailings, Boston Pond
Tailings, and Grosse-Point (Point Mills)
Tailings, and Dollar Bay Tailings.
Remedial Investigations have been
completed for all six OUs. The RI for
OUs 1 and 3 only investigated the
surface (0–6 inches) and shallow
subsurface (0–3 feet) stamp sands. In
addition, the RI assumed that the stamp
sands were homogenous, i.e., the stamp
sands had similar characteristics
wherever they were located.
The sampling performed to
characterize the OU3 and OU1 tailings
was adequate to select the Torch Lake
Site remedial action based on the
homogeneity of the parameters
measured, the distribution of
contaminant compounds, and the
relatively low levels of contaminants
found. While hot spot contamination
may exist, it is not attributable to
tailings composition, and could not be
reliably located or predicted using any
reasonable sampling program. The RI
and Baseline Risk Assessment (BRA)
reports for OU1 were finalized in July
1991. The RI and BRA reports for OU3
were finalized on February 7, 1992.
Record of Decision Findings
The Record of Decision (ROD) for
OU1 and OU3 was signed on September
30, 1992; and the ROD for OU2 was
signed on March 31, 1994.
Operable Unit 1 and Operable Unit 3
ROD (September 30, 1992)
The selected remedial action for the
various tailings areas was a soil and
vegetative cover, and deed restrictions
to control the migration of tailing piles.
The cover prevents direct contact
exposures as well as prevents erosion
from surface water runoff and the wind.
The cover helps prevent the further
degradation of Torch Lake’s eco-system,
allowing the Lake to recover over time.
The RAOs for OU1 and OU3 were
developed as a result of data collected
during the RI and included activities to
reduce or minimize the exposure to and
release of contaminants in tailings and/
or slag located at the Site. These
include:
1. Reduce or minimize potential risks
to human health associated with the
inhalation of airborne contaminants
from the tailings and/or slag located at
the Site;
2. Reduce or minimize potential risks
to human health associated with direct
contact with and/or the ingestion of the
tailings and/or the slag located at the
Site;
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Reduce or minimize the release of
contaminants in tailings to the
groundwater through leaching; and
4. Reduce or minimize the release of
contaminants in tailings to the surface
water and sediment by soil erosion and/
or air deposition.
All of the RAOs for the Torch Lake
parcels in this deletion package have
been met with the successful
implementation of a vegetative cover
over the stamp sands, tailing piles, and
slag materials and with the
implementation of deed restrictions
which prevent disturbance of the
vegetative covers. The vegetative soil
cover reduces airborne and direct
contact exposure to the contaminants in
the stamp sands, tailings, and slag. The
affected groundwater is part of OU2, for
which the selected remedy was no
action. OU2 was deleted from the NPL
in 2002 and since the selected remedy
for groundwater was no action, the
reduction or minimization of the release
of contaminants in tailings to the
groundwater through leaching does not
apply to OU’s 1 and 3. The vegetative
soil cover serves to stabilize the stamp
sands, tailings, and slag and reduce the
erosion of these materials and their
associated contaminants to the surface
water and sediment.
A 12 acre portion of the Isle Royale
tailings in OU3 was excluded from the
area to be covered with soil and
vegetation because it was developed as
a sewage treatment facility. The
remaining 48 acres was covered with
soil and vegetation by the Portage Lake
Water and Sewage Authority as part of
the sewage treatment facility
development plan.
A 90 acre portion of the Isle Royale
Tailings was developed as a residential
area and was excluded from the area to
be covered with soil and vegetation.
A 60 acre area of the Isle Royale
Tailings portion is currently being used
to make cement blocks and as a finished
block storage area for the Superior Block
Company and was excluded from the
area to be covered with soil and
vegetation. The owner and/or operator
of Superior Block Company must use
dust control measures such as water
spray during the operation of mining
and other activities in order to reduce
the release of dust into the air.
Operable Unit 2 ROD (March 31, 1994)
The selected remedy for OU2
(groundwater, surface water and
sediments associated with the Site),
which is not the focus of this partial
deletion, was ‘‘No Action’’ with longterm monitoring and Institutional
Controls with respect to groundwater
use. OU2 is impacted by OU1 and OU3
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
because wind-blown and eroded tailings
from OU1 and OU3 migrate into the
surface water and contaminate the
sediment. The contaminated stamp sand
serves as a continuing source of
environmentally harmful contamination
to the Lake and diminished the
effectiveness of the Lake’s natural
sedimentation process.
Remedial Design
In August 1994, an Interagency
Agreement (IAG) was signed with the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA)-Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) to perform remedial
design (RD) work. The RD was
conducted in conformance with the
1992 ROD and was completed for the
entire Site in September 1998.
Construction Activities
Actual on-site construction began in
June 1999 and was completed in
September 2005. A Preliminary CloseOut Report (PCOR) documenting
construction completion was signed on
September 23, 2005.
Operable Unit 1
Mason Sands Tailings (225 acres
covered) were covered in October 2002.
Just prior to on-site construction
activities at Mason Sands, the USDA–
NRCS commissioned Michigan
Technological University to conduct an
archaeological survey to evaluate and
document the cultural remnants at the
Mason Sands portion of the Site. This
was done because of the numerous
historical mining and milling related
relics located around the Mason area
and the concern over losing important
cultural remnants as a result of remedy
implementation. The results of the
survey were presented in a report dated
May 2001, ‘‘Archeological Survey
Report of the Quincy Mining Company
Torch Lake Smelter & Reclamation
Plant at Mason Sands Torch Lake EPA
Superfund Site’’, which was filed in the
EPA’s Torch Lake Site Administrative
Record. The May 2001 report concluded
that implementation of the remedy at
the Mason Sands portion of the Site
would have only a minor negative
impact on cultural and historical values,
and therefore, EPA proceeded with
remedy implementation.
The remedial design specifications
were modified during the
implementation phase and sandy soil,
consisting of six to ten inches of sandyloam soil and a vegetative mat were
used in place of topsoil. The vegetative
mat was achieved through a seed mix
applied directly on top of the sandyloam soil. The seed mix was typically
applied at approximately 90 pounds per
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64753
acre. The typical seed mix contained six
species of plants, including perennial
ryegrass (Lolium perene), tall fescue
(Festuca arundinacea), creeping red
fescue (Festica rubra), red clover
(Trifolium pratense), alfalfa (vernal
Medicago falcata), and birdsfoot trefoil
(Lotus comiculatus). This mix of plant
species was selected because of their
rapid growth rate and relative resilience
with minimal maintenance. Rapid
stabilization of the soil cover material
with vegetation was important at the
Site in order to avoid soil washouts and
to accommodate the short growing
season. Variations of this seed mix were
applied to a small number of areas to
accommodate landowner preference.
Overall, the vegetative growth is well
established and is stabilizing the soil
portion of the cover material.
The sandy-loam borrow soil was
located and obtained by construction
firms under contract with the USDA–
NRCS to implement the remedy and met
modified USDA–NRCS soil
specifications. Borrow soils for Mason
Sands were obtained directly across the
narrow Torch Lake channel located on
the south-east shore of the Mason
Sands. Remedial action construction
activities were performed according to
approved design and specifications at
Mason Sands and it is anticipated that
the cover material and shoreline
protection will continue to meet
remedial action objectives established
for the Site.
Operable Unit 2
No physical work was required as part
of the OU2 No Action ROD, thus there
were no construction activities for this
OU. EPA deleted OU2 in the April 2002
partial NPL delisting.
Operable Unit 3
Remedial action construction
activities were performed according to
approved design and specifications at
Michigan Smelter Tailings. The 1992
ROD for OU1and OU3 designated some
exceptions to the soil cover for the Isle
Royale Tailings area. Theses exceptions
included portions that were being
developed or used for other purposes.
Areas that were covered continued the
same soil and seed mix as used in OU1.
In 2004, EPA completed the remedy at
the Isle Royale Tailings by placing a 6inch vegetative cover over area stamp
sands and placing rip-rap along the
shoreline of the area. The change to
include rip-rap was documented in a
Memo to the File dated July 7, 2004.
Institutional Controls
In 1994, EPA issued an
Administrative Order on Consent (AOC)
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
64754
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
to all affected landowners requiring
them, within six months of the AOC, to
implement the appropriate deed
restriction on their property. The deed
restrictions run with the land and bind
future owners to the restrictions. The
institutional controls serve to protect
vegetative cover and thus prevent
residual mining contamination from
entering surface water by ensuring that
no disturbance of vegetative cover
occurs; or if disturbance occurs, the
owner is required to replace soil and
repair vegetative cover. There are
Restrictive Covenants on approximately
half of the properties at the Site, which
include the Michigan Smelter Tailings
property. The Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants for Isle Royale Tailings was
signed on October 14, 2008. The
following restriction applies; ‘‘If during
the process of any development,
building, construction, or other activity
on the property by or with consent from
the owner of the property, the cover is
disturbed so that upon completion of
the development, construction, building
or other activity stamp sand is exposed,
then the owner of the property shall
cover the exposed stamp sand and shall
re-vegetate the re-covered area’’.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Cleanup Goals
The objectives of the remedies were to
control exposures to Site contaminants
and control erosion of stamp sands,
tailings and slag to the surface water
and sediments by covering them with
vegetation. The remedial actions at Isle
Royale Tailings, Michigan Smelter
Tailings, and Mason Sands Tailings are
operational and functional. The
remedial actions are functioning
properly and performing as designed.
Operation and Maintenance (O&M)
EPA conducted activities necessary to
ensure that the implemented remedy at
Isle Royale Tailings, Michigan Smelter
Tailings, and Mason Sands was
operational and functional for a period
up to three years after remedial
construction at the last parcel. The
remedy was jointly determined by EPA
and MDEQ to be functioning properly
and performing as designed in
September 2008. EPA conducted annual
observations of the remediated areas for
three years after construction, and
conducted major repairs as necessary,
on each area where the remedy was
implemented.
In 2002, EPA conducted a study of
terrestrial environments at the Site to
characterize and document the
ecological conditions of the tailing areas
before and after implementation of the
remedy. The results of the study were
presented in the Torch Lake Stamp
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
Sand Evaluation Report dated March
2003. The report indicated a significant
environmental improvement. The soil
and vegetative cover has resulted in the
development of a soil stabilizing plant
community and habitat which has
attracted birds and mammals.
In 1999 and 2000, as part of long-term
monitoring, EPA conducted
environmental sampling as a way to
establish the environmental baseline
conditions of Torch Lake. The results of
the sampling efforts are presented in the
Baseline Study Report dated August
2001. Future long-term monitoring
events will be conducted by MDEQ and
the results compared to the 2001
baseline study to identify changes and/
or establish trends in lake conditions.
MDEQ has had the lead for OU2
monitoring since 2002, when OU2 was
deleted from the NPL.
In 2004, MDEQ conducted sampling
activities for monitoring of Torch Lake.
The monitoring was undertaken to
document and measure the status of
natural recovery of the Lake following
remedial actions. The 2004 sampling
work included assessing the benthic
community populations, measuring
sediment toxicity to benthic
invertebrates, measuring concentrations
of metals and semi-volatile organic
compounds in sediment and
groundwater, and studying the
sedimentation process in lake
sediments. The 2004 MDEQ long-term
monitoring data includes reports with
information relevant to sedimentation
rates and sediment toxicity.
MDEQ will be conducting O&M of the
shoreline protection and cover material.
In accordance with the September 1998
Superfund Site Contract (SSC) signed by
EPA and MDEQ, O&M was to begin
three years after the remedy
implementation or when the remedy
was jointly determined by EPA and
MDEQ to be functioning properly as
designed, whichever is earlier. This
milestone was reached in September
2008 for Isle Royale Tailings, Michigan
Smelter Tailings, and Mason Sands
Tailings; along with several other Torch
Lake property parcels.
Five-Year Review (FYR)
EPA conducted FYRs of the Site in
2003 and 2008. In the reviews, EPA
concluded that all remedial actions are
complete. The 2008 FYR noted that the
Isle Royale, Michigan Smelter Tailings
and Mason Sands remedies are
protective of human health and the
environment in the short-term. The
2008 FYR calls for continued
documentation from landowners at the
Site to verify proper deed restrictions
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
are in place. The next FYR will be
conducted in 2013.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have
been satisfied as required in CERCLA
section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and
CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617.
Documents in the deletion docket,
which EPA relied on for
recommendation of the Partial Deletion
of this Site from the NPL, are available
to the public in the information
repositories, and at
www.regulations.gov. Documents in the
docket include maps which identify the
specific parcels of land that are
proposed in this Notice (Isle-Royale
Tailings, Michigan Smelter Tailings,
and Mason Sands). Additional
community outreach will be conducted
to ensure the transparency of the
deletion process; to increase awareness
of potential non-Site related
environmental issues near the deleted
parcels; and to help the community
understand exactly where the deleted
portions of the Torch Lake Site are
located.
Determination That the Site Meets the
Criteria for Deletion in the NCP
The NCP (40 CFR 300.425(e)) states
that portions of a site may be deleted
from the NPL when no further response
action is appropriate. EPA, in
consultation with the State of Michigan,
has determined that no further action is
appropriate.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the
State of Michigan, through MDEQ, has
determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA, other
than operation, maintenance,
monitoring and five-year reviews, have
been completed. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the Isle Royale Tailings and
Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of
OU3 and the Mason Sands Tailings
parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication. This
action will be effective December 24,
2012 unless EPA receives adverse
comments by November 23, 2012. If
adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of partial deletion
before the effective date of the partial
deletion and it will not take effect. EPA
may prepare a response to comments
and continue with the deletion process
on the basis of the notice of intent to
partially delete and the comments
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
64755
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
already received. In such case, there
will be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Dated: September 19, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA, Region 5.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923;
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
Appendix B—[Amended]
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
PART 300—[AMENDED]
2. In table 1 of Appendix B to part
300, under Michigan ‘‘MI’’, the entry for
‘‘Torch Lake’’, ‘‘Houghton County,
Michigan’’ is revised to read as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
■
■
TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
(Notes) thnsp;a
State
Site name
City/County
*
*
MI ............................................................
*
*
Torch Lake .............................................
*
*
Houghton ................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
P
*
(a) A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, HRS score need not be >28.50).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. 2012–25968 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am]
I. Background
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
42 CFR Parts 412, 413, and 495
In FR Doc. 2012–21050 of September
4, 2012 (77 FR 53968), the final rule
entitled ‘‘Medicare and Medicaid
Programs; Electronic Health Record
Incentive Program—Stage 2’’ there were
a number of technical errors and
typographical errors that are identified
in the Summary of Errors section and
corrected in the Correction of Errors
section.
[CMS–0044–CN2]
II. Summary of Errors
RIN–0938–AQ84
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Electronic Health Record Incentive
Program—Stage 2; Corrections
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
This document corrects
technical errors and typographical
errors in the final rule entitled
‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Electronic Health Record Incentive
Program—Stage 2’’ which appeared in
the September 4, 2012 issue of the
Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: This document is
effective on November 12, 2012, except
that the correction to instruction 8.NN
(77 FR 54149) is effective October 23,
2012.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Travis Broome, (214) 767–4450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Oct 22, 2012
Jkt 229001
On page 54041 in our response to a
public comment regarding the
meaningful use objective ‘‘provide
structured electronic lab results to
eligible professionals,’’ we inadvertently
did not replace a placeholder ‘‘ONC
reference once available’’ with the
reference when it became available.
On page 54051, in our discussion of
the submission period for electronic
submissions, we inadvertently omitted
references to the applicable provider or
supplier (that is, eligible professional
(EP), eligible hospital, and critical
access hospital) that has to meet the
calendar year or fiscal year submission
period requirements. Also on this page
in the footnote following Table 5, we
made errors in our description of the
providers and suppliers that are in the
first year of demonstrating meaningful
use for purposes of avoiding a payment
adjustment.
On page 54052 in our response to
public comments regarding the
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
transition to electronic health record
(EHR) technology certified to the 2014
Edition EHR certification criteria, we
inadvertently omitted certain CQMs that
we included in the Stage 1 final rule but
are not finalizing in the Stage 2 final
rule for reporting beginning in CY 2014
after consideration of the public
comments. Also on this page, in another
response to public comments regarding
2011 Edition of EHR certification
criteria, we made a grammatical error.
On page 54053, we inadvertently
omitted certain CQMs that would be
excluded from an EP’s option of
reporting in the Stage 1 final rule.
On pages 54044, 54055, 54056, 54058,
54068, 54079, 54081, and 54120, we
made inadvertent errors in the
numbering and referencing of several
tables.
On page 54056, we made inadvertent
errors in specifying the providers and
suppliers that would receive the annual
fiscal or calendar year updates to the
clinical quality measure (CQM)
specifications.
On pages 54069, 54072, and 54073, in
Table 8—CQMs Finalized for Medicare
and Medicaid EPs Beginning with CY
2014, we made several typographical
and technical errors in the titles/
descriptions of several CQMs. We also
made typographical errors in
referencing the footnotes for CQM 0418.
B. Summary of Errors in the Regulations
Text
On page 54149, we made a technical
error in an amendatory statement (NN)
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64748-64755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005; FRL-9743-1]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Torch Lake Superfund
Site
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 is
publishing a Direct Final Notice of Deletion of the Isle Royale
Tailings and Michigan Smelter Tailing parcels of Operable Unit 3 (OU3),
and the Mason Sands Tailings parcel of Operable Unit 1 (OU1) of the
Torch Lake Superfund Site (Site), located in Houghton County, Michigan
from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated pursuant
to Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct final partial deletion is being
published by EPA, with the concurrence of the State of Michigan through
the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), because EPA
has determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA at
these identified parcels have been completed. However, this partial
deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to the surface tailings, drums, and
slag piles of Isle Royale Tailings and Michigan Smelter Tailings
parcels of OU3 and the Mason Sands Tailings parcel of OU1. The
following land parcels will remain on the NPL and are not being
considered for deletion as part of this action: Dollar Bay, Point
Mills, Calumet Lake Tailing, Boston Pond Tailing, North Entry and
Quincy Smelter.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion is effective December 24,
2012 unless EPA receives adverse comments by November 23, 2012. If
adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final partial deletion in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1986-0005, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments.
Email: Nefertiti DiCosmo, Remedial Project Manager, at
dicosmo.nefertiti@epa.gov
Email: Dave Novak, Community Involvement Coordinator, at
novak.dave@epa.gov
Fax: Gladys Beard, NPL Deletion Process Manager, at (312)
886-2077.
[[Page 64749]]
Mail: Nefertiti DiCosmo, Remedial Project Manager, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (SR-6J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886-6148, or Dave Novak, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SI-7J), 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886-7478 or 1-800-621-8431.
Hand deliver: Dave Novak, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SI-7J), 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1986-0005. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
Regional Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency--Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL, 60604, Hours: Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Lake Linden/Hubbell Public Library, 601 Calumet Street, Lake Linden, MI
49945, (906) 296-0698, Hours: Monday through Friday 8:00am to 4:00
p.m., Tuesday and Thursday 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Portage Lake District Library, 105 Huron, Houghton, MI 49931, (906)
482-4570, Hours: Monday, Tuesday and Thursday 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.,
Wednesday and Friday 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and Saturday 12:00 p.m.
to 5:00 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nefertiti DiCosmo, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SR-6J), 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886-4737, dicosmo.nefertiti@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 5 is publishing this Direct Final Notice of Deletion of
the Isle Royale Tailings and Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of OU3,
and Mason Sands Tailings parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake Superfund
(Site) from the NPL and requests public comments on this action. The
NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), which
EPA promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980,
as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions
financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This partial
deletion of the Torch Lake Superfund Site is proposed in accordance
with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent with the Notice of Policy
Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the National Priorities
List (60 FR 55466) on November 1, 1995. As described in 300.425(e)(3)
of the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL remain eligible for Fund-
financed remedial actions if future conditions warrant such actions.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, this action will be effective December 24, 2012 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by November 23, 2012. Along with this Direct
Final Notice of Partial Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the
Federal Register. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of this direct final Notice for Partial Deletion
before the effective date of the partial deletion, and the deletion may
not take effect. Alternatively EPA may, as appropriate, prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments
already received. In this case, there will be no additional opportunity
to comment on the agency's response.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the Isle Royale Tailings and
Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of OU3 and the Mason Sands Tailings
parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake Superfund Site and demonstrates how the
deletion criteria are met at these land parcels. Section V discusses
EPA's action to partially delete the Site parcels from the NPL unless
adverse comments are received during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
[[Page 64750]]
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Isle Royale
Tailings and Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of OU3, and the Mason
Sands Tailings parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake Superfund Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the State of Michigan prior to developing
this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion co-published today in the ``Proposed Rules''
section of the Federal Register.
(2) EPA has provided the State 30 working days for review of this
Direct Final Notice of Partial Deletion and the parallel Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion prior to their publication today, and the
State, through MDEQ, has concurred on the partial deletion of the Site
from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication of this direct final Notice
of Partial Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion is being published in the Daily
Mining Gazette Newspaper, located in Houghton, Michigan. The newspaper
notice announces the 30-day public comment period concerning the Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site from the NPL. A public
meeting will be held prior to the end of the comment period to ensure
the public understands the delisting process and the locations of the
land parcels proposed for deletion.
(4) EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed partial
deletion in the deletion docket and made these items available for
public inspection and copying at the Site information repositories.
(5) If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this Direct Final Notice of Partial
Deletion before its effective date and will prepare a response to
comments. EPA may continue with the deletion process on the basis of
the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments already
received.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for future
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
Isle Royale Tailings and Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of OU3 and
Mason Sands Tailings parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake Superfund Site
from the NPL. The Isle Royale Tailings area comprises approximately 64
acres of cover material northwest of U.S. 41, next to Portage Lake. It
is located near the town of Houghton, in the northwestern corner of
Section 5 in Portage Township, Michigan (Township 54 N Range 33 W). The
Torch Lake Superfund Site Isle Royale Tailings property parcel is also
referred to as Isle Royale Stamp Mill or Isle Royale Sands. It is the
parcel of property on the west side of Houghton that was part of a mine
rock crushing operation. The Site has no relation to the Isle Royale
that is the island located in Lake Superior.
A legal description of the Isle Royale Tailings portion of the
Torch Lake Superfund Site is as follows: A parcel of land in Government
Lot 2, Section 5, T54N, R33W, City of Houghton, Houghton County,
Michigan. Commencing at the West \1/4\ corner of said Section 5; thence
North 1069.47 feet; thence East 1584.79 feet to the point of beginning
on the Northeasterly right-of-way of the Soo Line Railroad; thence N
33[deg] 42' 20'' E 229.36 feet to the South right-of-way (66-ft. R/W)
of Carlos Street of the recorded plat of Royale Isle Subdivision;
thence S 56[deg] 17'40'' E 380.00 feet along said Carlos Street right-
of-way and extension thereof; thence S 33[deg] 42' 20'' W 250.29 feet
to the Northeasterly right-of-way of said Soo railroad; thence along
said right-of-way on a curve to the right N 53[deg] 08' 19'' W 380.68
feet more or less to the point of beginning.
The Michigan Smelter Tailings parcel is located in a 15-acre, low-
lying area of stamp sands east of Houghton Canal Road on the shores of
Portage Lake, in Sections 28, 33, and 34 of Adams/Stanton Township,
Michigan (55 N Range 34 W). There is a piece of property nearby, on the
west side of Houghton Canal Road, known as Michigan Smelter that
includes the buildings and abandoned materials where industrial
activities took place. This property is not part of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site and was not investigated or remediated as part of the
Site activities. There may be high levels of arsenic or other
contaminants associated with past mining activity in that area, but
such contamination would not be considered as part of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site.
The legal description of the Michigan Smelter Tailings portion of
the Torch Lake Superfund Site is as follows--Parcel 1: Section 33,
T55N, R34W, Adams Township, Houghton County, Michigan, Government Lot 1
lying North of County Road 554, except commencing at the North \1/4\
corner; thence South 320 feet to P.O.B.; thence Southeasterly 90.18
feet; thence Northeasterly 569.59 feet; thence North 202.57 feet;
thence Southeasterly 410.48 feet to South right of way of Canal Road;
thence Southeasterly along Canal Road 888 feet more or less; thence
South 676 feet to South line of Government Lot 1; thence Southwesterly
1692 feet to the West line of Government Lot 1; thence North 980.78
feet to P.O.B. Parcel 2: Section 34, T55N, R34W, Adams Township,
Houghton County, Michigan, Government Lot 3 lying North of County Road
554, also West 121.90 feet of Government Lot 4 lying North of County
Road 554. Parcel 3: Section 28, T55N, R34W, Stanton Township, Houghton
County, Michigan, part of Government Lot 4, commencing North 00[deg]
34' 31'' West 35.08 feet from South \1\2\; Corner; thence North 00[deg]
34' 31'' West 1252.70 feet; thence south 89[deg] 33' 12'' East 102.60
feet; thence South 89[deg] 35' 56'' East 151.39 feet to shore; thence
South 46[deg] 13' 52'' East 804.26 feet; thence South 55[deg] 13' 38''
East 1279.14 ; thence West 713.78 feet; thence North 46[deg] 48' 32''
West 766.52 feet; thence South 43[deg] 09' 07'' West 66 feet; thence
South 01[deg] 45' 30'' East 57.69 feet; thence South 08[deg] 31' 32''
West 141.99 feet; thence South 10[deg] 03' 39'' West 69.72 feet; thence
South 71[deg] 33' 12'' West 552.04 feet to P.O.B.
The Mason Sands Tailings area is about 225 acres and is located
within a fenced in area south of M-26 and expands until the land meets
the lake (Torch Lake). It is adjacent to the Village of Mason and is
located in Sections 23, 26, and 27 of Township 55 North, Range
[[Page 64751]]
33 West. Located within the Mason Sands parcel of the Site are
dilapidated industrial structures, building foundations, and other
debris. These abandoned structures, foundations and debris are not part
of the Torch Lake Superfund Site and were not investigated or
remediated. The surface tailings at this Mason area constitute the area
addressed by the Torch Lake Site remedial action. The legal description
of the Mason Sands portion of the Torch Lake Superfund Site is as
follows. Government. Lot 2--Section 14--T.55N-R.33 W lying East of
State Highway M-26 Right-of-Way, except as follows: Commencing at a
point on shore of Torch Lake 500' from meander post on line between
Sections 13 & 14, thence N.55[deg]40' West to North boundary line of
Lot 2 Section 14, thence East along North boundary of said Lot 2 to
shore of Torch Lake, thence Southwesterly along said lake to Point of
Beginning except Right-of-Way of C&H RR. 53.32.A. Gov't. Lots 1, 2, 3,
and 4--Section 23--T.55 N.-R.33 W. lying East of abandoned railroad
Right-of-Way, except as follows: Part of Government Lot 4, Section 23,
and Government Lot 5, Section 26, T.55N, R.33W, Osceola Township,
Houghton County, Michigan, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a section corner common to Sections 22, 23, 26 and 27,
T.55N, R.33W; then due South 480.66 feet to the point of beginning:
thence N43[deg] 54' 04'' E 1164.53 feet; thence S51[deg] 08' 38''E
124.89 feet to a point located in the Northwesterly right-of-way line
of State Highway M-26; thence S00[deg] 02' 18'' W 112.29 feet to a
point located in the Southeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway
M-26; thence S50[deg] 16' 58'' E 21.89 feet; thence S35[deg] 39' 41'' E
251.20 feet; thence S32[deg] 31' 34'' W 189.24 feet; thence N55[deg]
59' 01'' W 158.27 feet; thence N58[deg] 48' 17'' W 75.02 feet to a
point located in the Northwesterly right-of-way line of an abandoned
railroad; thence S32[deg] 31' 34'' W 44.66 feet along said
Northwesterly right-of-way line of an abandoned railroad; thence on a
curve to the right, having a radius of 2814.93 feet a long chord
bearing and distance of S39[deg] 15' 17'' W 659.63 feet, 661.15 feet
along said Northwesterly right-of-way line of an abandoned railroad;
thence continuing along said abandoned railroad right-of-way S45[deg]
59' 00'' W 458.12 feet; thence due North 468.57 feet to the point of
beginning, containing 461,453 square feet, which is 10.59 acres
including road right-of-ways. Government. Lot 5--Section 26--T.55N-
R.33W. lying East of abandoned railroad Right-of-Way, except as
follows: Part of Government Lot 4, Section 23, and Government Lot 5,
Section 26, T.55N, R.33W., Osceola Township, Houghton County, Michigan,
more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a section corner
common to Sections 22, 23, 26, and 27, T.55N, R.33W.; then due South
480.66 feet to the point of beginning: thence N43[deg] 54' 04'' E
1164.53 feet; thence S51[deg] 08' 38'' E 124.89 feet to a point located
in the Northwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway M-26; thence
S00[deg] 02' 18'' W 112.29 feet to a point located in the Southeasterly
right-of-way line of State Highway M-26; thence S50[deg] 16' 58'' E
21.89 feet; thence S35[deg] 39' 41'' E 251.20 feet; thence S32[deg] 31'
34'' W 189.24 feet; thence N55[deg] 59' 01'' W 158.27 feet; thence
N58[deg] 48' 17'' W 75.02 feet to a point located in the Northwesterly
right-of-way line of an abandoned railroad; thence S32[deg] 31' 34'' W
44.66 feet along said Northwesterly right-of-way line of an abandoned
railroad; thence on a curve to the right, having a radius of 2814.93
feet a long chord bearing and distance of S39[deg] 15' 17'' W 659.63
feet, 661.15 feet along said Northwesterly right-of-way line of an
abandoned railroad; thence continuing along said abandoned railroad
right-of-way S45[deg] 59' 00'' W 458.12 feet; thence due North 468.57
feet to the point of beginning, containing 461,453 square feet, which
is 10.59 acres including road right-of-ways. Government Lot 1--Section
27--T.55N-R.33W lying east of abandoned railroad Right-of-Way. That
portion of Government Lot 2--Section 27--T.55N-R.33W lying in the West
\1/2\ of the Southwest \1/4\ of said Section. It being understood and
intended that the above described land extends to the waters edge of
Torch Lake and to include any tailing sands and slag that may have
accreted to said land, or to other lands in Section 26--T.55N.--R.33W.
Site Background and History
Site Location
The Site is located on the Keweenaw Peninsula in Houghton County,
Michigan. The Site (CERCLIS ID MID980901946) includes Torch Lake, the
northern portion of Portage Lake, and the northern entry of Torch Lake.
The following areas were selected for remedial measures and thus became
part of the Site: defined areas of stamp sands, tailing piles, and slag
materials along the shore of and in the vicinity of Torch Lake,
Northern Portage Lake, Keweenaw Waterway, Lake Superior, Boston Pond,
Calumet Lake, Lake Linden, Hubbell/Tamarack City, Mason, Calumet Lake,
Michigan Smelter, Isle Royale, Gross Point, and Quincy Smelter. These
defined areas were not investigated at depth and were defined as part
of the Torch Lake Superfund Site the surficial materials (stamp sands,
tailings, and slag) on these areas and their relative locations to the
Torch Lake water body. These areas cover over 600 acres. During the
Site investigation, samples were taken of the surface (0-6 inches) and
shallow subsurface (0-3 feet) stamp sands, tailings, and slag piles at
the frequency of approximately one composite sample per 20 acre-parcel.
Data generated reflected similar chemical characteristics in all
samples collected. This data was sufficient to assume homogeneity of
these materials and to support selection of the Site's remedial action.
The remedial action included the installation of a soil vegetative
cover over these defined areas of stamp sands, tailings, and slag in
order to meet the Site Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs). The remedial
action only addressed surfurce materials associated with the covered
land parcels. There may be non-Site related contamination with depth or
in the vicinity of these defined areas of stamp sands, tailings, and
slag that are not addressed by this Site remedial action (i.e.,
vegetative cover). This potential contamination was not evaluated or
addressed as part of the remedial measures for the Torch Lake Superfund
Site. Non-Site related contamination, if identified in the future, will
not be addressed by a subsequent action as part of the Torch Lake
Superfund Site's remedial action.
Site History
Torch Lake was the site of copper milling and smelting facilities
and operations for over 100 years. Torch Lake was a repository of
milling wastes, and served as the waterway transportation to support
the mining industry. The first mill opened on Torch Lake in 1868. At
the mills, copper was extracted by crushing or stamping the rock into
smaller pieces and driving them through successively smaller meshes.
The copper and crushed rocks were separated by gravimetric sorting in a
liquid medium. The copper was sent to a smelter. The crushed rock
particles, called tailings, were discarded along with mill processing
water, typically by pumping them into the Lake.
Mining output, milling activity, and tailing production peaked in
the Keweenaw Peninsula in the early 1900s to 1920. All of the mills at
Torch Lake were located on the west shore of the Lake and many other
mining mills and smelters were located throughout the Keweenaw
Peninsula. In the early
[[Page 64752]]
1900s, advances in technology allowed recovery of copper from tailings
previously deposited in Torch Lake. Dredges were used to collect
submerged tailings which were then screened, recrushed, and gravity
separated. An ammonia leaching process involving cupric ammonium
carbonate was used to recover copper and other metals from conglomerate
tailings. During the 1920s, chemical reagents were used to further
increase the efficiency of reclamation. The chemical reagents included
lime, pyridine oil, coal tar creosotes, wood creosote, pine oil, and
xanthates. After reclamation activities were complete, chemically
treated tailings were returned to the lake. In the 1930s and 1940s, the
Torch Lake mills operated mainly to recover tailings in Torch Lake. In
the 1950s, copper mills were still active; but by the late 1960s,
copper milling had ceased.
Over 5 million tons of native copper was produced from the Keweenaw
Peninsula and more than half of this was processed along the shores of
Torch Lake. Between 1868 and 1968, approximately 200 million tons of
tailings were dumped into Torch Lake filling at least 20 percent of the
Lake's original volume.
In June 1972, a discharge of 27,000 gallons of cupric ammonium
carbonate leaching liquor occurred into the north end of Torch Lake
from the storage vats at the Lake Linden Leaching Plant. The Michigan
Water Resources Commission (MWRC) investigated the spill. The 1973 MWRC
report discerned no deleterious effects associated with the spill, but
did observe discoloration of several acres of the lake bottom
indicating previous discharges. In the 1970s, environmental concern
developed regarding the century-long deposition of tailings into Torch
Lake. High concentrations of copper and other heavy metals in Torch
Lake sediments, toxic discharges into the Lake, and fish abnormalities
prompted many investigations into long and short-term impacts
attributed to mine waste disposal. The International Joint Commission's
Water Quality Board designated the Torch Lake basin as a Great Lakes
Area of Concern (AOC) in 1983. Also in 1983, the Michigan Department of
Public Health announced an advisory against the consumption of Torch
Lake sauger and walleye fish due to tumors of unknown origin.
The Torch Lake Site was proposed for inclusion on the National
Priorities List (NPL) in October of 1984, Federal Register (49 FR
40320). The Site was placed on the NPL in June 1986, (51 FR21054). The
Torch Lake Site is also on the list of sites identified under
Michigan's Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act 451 Part
201. Residential use is planned for these land parcels after they are
deleted from the NPL.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
On May 9, 1988 Special Notice Letters were issued to Universal Oil
Products and Quincy Mining Company to perform a Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study (RI/FS). Universal Oil Products was the successor
corporation of Calumet Hecla Mining Company which operated its milling
and smelting on the shore of Lake Linden and disposed the generated
tailings in the area. On June 13, 1988 a Notice Letter was issued to
Quincy Development Company, which was the current owner of a tailing
pile located on the Lake shore of Mason City. Negotiations for the RI/
FS Consent Order with these Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) were
not successful due to issues such as the extent of the Site, and the
number of PRPs. Subsequently, EPA contracted with Donohue & Associates
in November 1988 to perform the RI/FS at the Site.
On June 21, 1989 EPA collected a total of eight samples from drums
located in the Old Calumet and Hecla Smelting Mill Site near Lake
Linden, the Ahmeek Mill Site near Hubbell City, and the Quincy Site
near Mason. On August 1, 1990 nine more samples were collected from
drums located above the Tamarack Site near Tamarack City. Based on the
results of these samples, EPA determined that some of these drums may
have contained hazardous substances. During the week of May 8, 1989 EPA
also conducted ground penetrating radar and a sub bottom profile
(seismic) survey of the bottom of Torch Lake. The area in which this
survey was conducted is immediately off-shore from the Old Calumet and
Hecla Smelting Mill Site. The survey located several point targets
(possibly drums) on the bottom of Torch Lake.
Due to the size and complex nature of the Site, six OUs have been
defined for the Site. OU1, OU2 and OU3 are the remedial OUs; and OU4,
OU5 and OU6 are the removal OUs. OU1 includes surface tailings, drums,
and slag piles on the western shore of Torch Lake. Approximately 500
acres of tailings were previously exposed surficially in OU1. The
Hubbell/Tamarack Tailings, the Lake Linden Tailings and Mason Sands
parcels are included in OU1. OU2 includes groundwater, surface water,
submerged tailings and sediment in Torch Lake, Portage Lake, the
Portage channel, and other surface water bodies at the Site. OU3
includes the North Entry of Lake Superior Tailings, Michigan Smelter
Tailings, Quincy Smelter Tailings, Calumet Lake Tailings, Isle Royale
Tailings, Boston Pond Tailings, and Grosse-Point (Point Mills)
Tailings, and Dollar Bay Tailings. Remedial Investigations have been
completed for all six OUs. The RI for OUs 1 and 3 only investigated the
surface (0-6 inches) and shallow subsurface (0-3 feet) stamp sands. In
addition, the RI assumed that the stamp sands were homogenous, i.e.,
the stamp sands had similar characteristics wherever they were located.
The sampling performed to characterize the OU3 and OU1 tailings was
adequate to select the Torch Lake Site remedial action based on the
homogeneity of the parameters measured, the distribution of contaminant
compounds, and the relatively low levels of contaminants found. While
hot spot contamination may exist, it is not attributable to tailings
composition, and could not be reliably located or predicted using any
reasonable sampling program. The RI and Baseline Risk Assessment (BRA)
reports for OU1 were finalized in July 1991. The RI and BRA reports for
OU3 were finalized on February 7, 1992.
Record of Decision Findings
The Record of Decision (ROD) for OU1 and OU3 was signed on
September 30, 1992; and the ROD for OU2 was signed on March 31, 1994.
Operable Unit 1 and Operable Unit 3 ROD (September 30, 1992)
The selected remedial action for the various tailings areas was a
soil and vegetative cover, and deed restrictions to control the
migration of tailing piles. The cover prevents direct contact exposures
as well as prevents erosion from surface water runoff and the wind. The
cover helps prevent the further degradation of Torch Lake's eco-system,
allowing the Lake to recover over time.
The RAOs for OU1 and OU3 were developed as a result of data
collected during the RI and included activities to reduce or minimize
the exposure to and release of contaminants in tailings and/or slag
located at the Site. These include:
1. Reduce or minimize potential risks to human health associated
with the inhalation of airborne contaminants from the tailings and/or
slag located at the Site;
2. Reduce or minimize potential risks to human health associated
with direct contact with and/or the ingestion of the tailings and/or
the slag located at the Site;
[[Page 64753]]
3. Reduce or minimize the release of contaminants in tailings to
the groundwater through leaching; and
4. Reduce or minimize the release of contaminants in tailings to
the surface water and sediment by soil erosion and/or air deposition.
All of the RAOs for the Torch Lake parcels in this deletion package
have been met with the successful implementation of a vegetative cover
over the stamp sands, tailing piles, and slag materials and with the
implementation of deed restrictions which prevent disturbance of the
vegetative covers. The vegetative soil cover reduces airborne and
direct contact exposure to the contaminants in the stamp sands,
tailings, and slag. The affected groundwater is part of OU2, for which
the selected remedy was no action. OU2 was deleted from the NPL in 2002
and since the selected remedy for groundwater was no action, the
reduction or minimization of the release of contaminants in tailings to
the groundwater through leaching does not apply to OU's 1 and 3. The
vegetative soil cover serves to stabilize the stamp sands, tailings,
and slag and reduce the erosion of these materials and their associated
contaminants to the surface water and sediment.
A 12 acre portion of the Isle Royale tailings in OU3 was excluded
from the area to be covered with soil and vegetation because it was
developed as a sewage treatment facility. The remaining 48 acres was
covered with soil and vegetation by the Portage Lake Water and Sewage
Authority as part of the sewage treatment facility development plan.
A 90 acre portion of the Isle Royale Tailings was developed as a
residential area and was excluded from the area to be covered with soil
and vegetation.
A 60 acre area of the Isle Royale Tailings portion is currently
being used to make cement blocks and as a finished block storage area
for the Superior Block Company and was excluded from the area to be
covered with soil and vegetation. The owner and/or operator of Superior
Block Company must use dust control measures such as water spray during
the operation of mining and other activities in order to reduce the
release of dust into the air.
Operable Unit 2 ROD (March 31, 1994)
The selected remedy for OU2 (groundwater, surface water and
sediments associated with the Site), which is not the focus of this
partial deletion, was ``No Action'' with long-term monitoring and
Institutional Controls with respect to groundwater use. OU2 is impacted
by OU1 and OU3 because wind-blown and eroded tailings from OU1 and OU3
migrate into the surface water and contaminate the sediment. The
contaminated stamp sand serves as a continuing source of
environmentally harmful contamination to the Lake and diminished the
effectiveness of the Lake's natural sedimentation process.
Remedial Design
In August 1994, an Interagency Agreement (IAG) was signed with the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) to perform remedial design (RD) work. The
RD was conducted in conformance with the 1992 ROD and was completed for
the entire Site in September 1998.
Construction Activities
Actual on-site construction began in June 1999 and was completed in
September 2005. A Preliminary Close-Out Report (PCOR) documenting
construction completion was signed on September 23, 2005.
Operable Unit 1
Mason Sands Tailings (225 acres covered) were covered in October
2002. Just prior to on-site construction activities at Mason Sands, the
USDA-NRCS commissioned Michigan Technological University to conduct an
archaeological survey to evaluate and document the cultural remnants at
the Mason Sands portion of the Site. This was done because of the
numerous historical mining and milling related relics located around
the Mason area and the concern over losing important cultural remnants
as a result of remedy implementation. The results of the survey were
presented in a report dated May 2001, ``Archeological Survey Report of
the Quincy Mining Company Torch Lake Smelter & Reclamation Plant at
Mason Sands Torch Lake EPA Superfund Site'', which was filed in the
EPA's Torch Lake Site Administrative Record. The May 2001 report
concluded that implementation of the remedy at the Mason Sands portion
of the Site would have only a minor negative impact on cultural and
historical values, and therefore, EPA proceeded with remedy
implementation.
The remedial design specifications were modified during the
implementation phase and sandy soil, consisting of six to ten inches of
sandy-loam soil and a vegetative mat were used in place of topsoil. The
vegetative mat was achieved through a seed mix applied directly on top
of the sandy-loam soil. The seed mix was typically applied at
approximately 90 pounds per acre. The typical seed mix contained six
species of plants, including perennial ryegrass (Lolium perene), tall
fescue (Festuca arundinacea), creeping red fescue (Festica rubra), red
clover (Trifolium pratense), alfalfa (vernal Medicago falcata), and
birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus comiculatus). This mix of plant species was
selected because of their rapid growth rate and relative resilience
with minimal maintenance. Rapid stabilization of the soil cover
material with vegetation was important at the Site in order to avoid
soil washouts and to accommodate the short growing season. Variations
of this seed mix were applied to a small number of areas to accommodate
landowner preference. Overall, the vegetative growth is well
established and is stabilizing the soil portion of the cover material.
The sandy-loam borrow soil was located and obtained by construction
firms under contract with the USDA-NRCS to implement the remedy and met
modified USDA-NRCS soil specifications. Borrow soils for Mason Sands
were obtained directly across the narrow Torch Lake channel located on
the south-east shore of the Mason Sands. Remedial action construction
activities were performed according to approved design and
specifications at Mason Sands and it is anticipated that the cover
material and shoreline protection will continue to meet remedial action
objectives established for the Site.
Operable Unit 2
No physical work was required as part of the OU2 No Action ROD,
thus there were no construction activities for this OU. EPA deleted OU2
in the April 2002 partial NPL delisting.
Operable Unit 3
Remedial action construction activities were performed according to
approved design and specifications at Michigan Smelter Tailings. The
1992 ROD for OU1and OU3 designated some exceptions to the soil cover
for the Isle Royale Tailings area. Theses exceptions included portions
that were being developed or used for other purposes. Areas that were
covered continued the same soil and seed mix as used in OU1. In 2004,
EPA completed the remedy at the Isle Royale Tailings by placing a 6-
inch vegetative cover over area stamp sands and placing rip-rap along
the shoreline of the area. The change to include rip-rap was documented
in a Memo to the File dated July 7, 2004.
Institutional Controls
In 1994, EPA issued an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC)
[[Page 64754]]
to all affected landowners requiring them, within six months of the
AOC, to implement the appropriate deed restriction on their property.
The deed restrictions run with the land and bind future owners to the
restrictions. The institutional controls serve to protect vegetative
cover and thus prevent residual mining contamination from entering
surface water by ensuring that no disturbance of vegetative cover
occurs; or if disturbance occurs, the owner is required to replace soil
and repair vegetative cover. There are Restrictive Covenants on
approximately half of the properties at the Site, which include the
Michigan Smelter Tailings property. The Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants for Isle Royale Tailings was signed on October 14, 2008. The
following restriction applies; ``If during the process of any
development, building, construction, or other activity on the property
by or with consent from the owner of the property, the cover is
disturbed so that upon completion of the development, construction,
building or other activity stamp sand is exposed, then the owner of the
property shall cover the exposed stamp sand and shall re-vegetate the
re-covered area''.
Cleanup Goals
The objectives of the remedies were to control exposures to Site
contaminants and control erosion of stamp sands, tailings and slag to
the surface water and sediments by covering them with vegetation. The
remedial actions at Isle Royale Tailings, Michigan Smelter Tailings,
and Mason Sands Tailings are operational and functional. The remedial
actions are functioning properly and performing as designed.
Operation and Maintenance (O&M)
EPA conducted activities necessary to ensure that the implemented
remedy at Isle Royale Tailings, Michigan Smelter Tailings, and Mason
Sands was operational and functional for a period up to three years
after remedial construction at the last parcel. The remedy was jointly
determined by EPA and MDEQ to be functioning properly and performing as
designed in September 2008. EPA conducted annual observations of the
remediated areas for three years after construction, and conducted
major repairs as necessary, on each area where the remedy was
implemented.
In 2002, EPA conducted a study of terrestrial environments at the
Site to characterize and document the ecological conditions of the
tailing areas before and after implementation of the remedy. The
results of the study were presented in the Torch Lake Stamp Sand
Evaluation Report dated March 2003. The report indicated a significant
environmental improvement. The soil and vegetative cover has resulted
in the development of a soil stabilizing plant community and habitat
which has attracted birds and mammals.
In 1999 and 2000, as part of long-term monitoring, EPA conducted
environmental sampling as a way to establish the environmental baseline
conditions of Torch Lake. The results of the sampling efforts are
presented in the Baseline Study Report dated August 2001. Future long-
term monitoring events will be conducted by MDEQ and the results
compared to the 2001 baseline study to identify changes and/or
establish trends in lake conditions. MDEQ has had the lead for OU2
monitoring since 2002, when OU2 was deleted from the NPL.
In 2004, MDEQ conducted sampling activities for monitoring of Torch
Lake. The monitoring was undertaken to document and measure the status
of natural recovery of the Lake following remedial actions. The 2004
sampling work included assessing the benthic community populations,
measuring sediment toxicity to benthic invertebrates, measuring
concentrations of metals and semi-volatile organic compounds in
sediment and groundwater, and studying the sedimentation process in
lake sediments. The 2004 MDEQ long-term monitoring data includes
reports with information relevant to sedimentation rates and sediment
toxicity.
MDEQ will be conducting O&M of the shoreline protection and cover
material. In accordance with the September 1998 Superfund Site Contract
(SSC) signed by EPA and MDEQ, O&M was to begin three years after the
remedy implementation or when the remedy was jointly determined by EPA
and MDEQ to be functioning properly as designed, whichever is earlier.
This milestone was reached in September 2008 for Isle Royale Tailings,
Michigan Smelter Tailings, and Mason Sands Tailings; along with several
other Torch Lake property parcels.
Five-Year Review (FYR)
EPA conducted FYRs of the Site in 2003 and 2008. In the reviews,
EPA concluded that all remedial actions are complete. The 2008 FYR
noted that the Isle Royale, Michigan Smelter Tailings and Mason Sands
remedies are protective of human health and the environment in the
short-term. The 2008 FYR calls for continued documentation from
landowners at the Site to verify proper deed restrictions are in place.
The next FYR will be conducted in 2013.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA section 117, 42
U.S.C. 9617. Documents in the deletion docket, which EPA relied on for
recommendation of the Partial Deletion of this Site from the NPL, are
available to the public in the information repositories, and at
www.regulations.gov. Documents in the docket include maps which
identify the specific parcels of land that are proposed in this Notice
(Isle-Royale Tailings, Michigan Smelter Tailings, and Mason Sands).
Additional community outreach will be conducted to ensure the
transparency of the deletion process; to increase awareness of
potential non-Site related environmental issues near the deleted
parcels; and to help the community understand exactly where the deleted
portions of the Torch Lake Site are located.
Determination That the Site Meets the Criteria for Deletion in the NCP
The NCP (40 CFR 300.425(e)) states that portions of a site may be
deleted from the NPL when no further response action is appropriate.
EPA, in consultation with the State of Michigan, has determined that no
further action is appropriate.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the State of Michigan, through MDEQ,
has determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA,
other than operation, maintenance, monitoring and five-year reviews,
have been completed. Therefore, EPA is deleting the Isle Royale
Tailings and Michigan Smelter Tailings parcels of OU3 and the Mason
Sands Tailings parcel of OU1 of the Torch Lake Superfund Site from the
NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective December 24, 2012 unless EPA receives adverse comments by
November 23, 2012. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of partial deletion before the effective date of
the partial deletion and it will not take effect. EPA may prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the notice of intent to partially delete and the comments
[[Page 64755]]
already received. In such case, there will be no additional opportunity
to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: September 19, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA, Region 5.
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is
amended as follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. In table 1 of Appendix B to part 300, under Michigan ``MI'', the
entry for ``Torch Lake'', ``Houghton County, Michigan'' is revised to
read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List
Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Site name City/County (Notes)\ a\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
MI................................. Torch Lake............ Houghton.............. P
* * * * * * *
(a) A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, HRS
score need not be >28.50).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. 2012-25968 Filed 10-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P