Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus, 64585-64586 [2012-25911]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2012–0218]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Diabetes Mellitus
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 28 individuals from
its rule prohibiting persons with
insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions will enable these
individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
October 22, 2012. The exemptions
expire on October 22, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64–224, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT’s dockets by
the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or of the person signing
the comment, if submitted on behalf of
an association, business, labor union, or
other entity). You may review DOT’s
Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you
may visit https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/
2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
Background
On August 29, 2012, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
diabetes exemption applications from
28 individuals and requested comments
from the public (77 FR 52384). The
public comment period closed on
September 28, 2012, and two comments
were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of the 28 applicants and determined that
granting the exemptions to these
individuals would achieve a level of
safety equivalent to or greater than the
level that would be achieved by
complying with the current regulation
49 CFR 391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving
Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current
requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated
that drivers with diabetes had a higher
rate of crash involvement than the
general population. The diabetes rule
provides that ‘‘A person is physically
qualified to drive a commercial motor
vehicle if that person has no established
medical history or clinical diagnosis of
diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control’’ (49 CFR
391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes
exemption program, based on the
Agency’s July 2000 study entitled ‘‘A
Report to Congress on the Feasibility of
a Program to Qualify Individuals With
Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus To
Operate in Interstate Commerce as
Directed by the Transportation Act for
the 21st Century.’’ The report concluded
that a safe and practicable protocol to
allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The
September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441),
Federal Register notice in conjunction
with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR
67777), Federal Register notice provides
the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
These 28 applicants have had ITDM
over a range of 1 to 46 years. These
applicants report no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss
of consciousness or seizure, requiring
the assistance of another person, or
resulting in impaired cognitive function
that occurred without warning
symptoms, in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (2 or more) severe
hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5
years. In each case, an endocrinologist
verified that the driver has
demonstrated a willingness to properly
monitor and manage his/her diabetes
mellitus, received education related to
diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no
other disqualifying conditions,
including diabetes-related
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64585
complications. Each meets the vision
requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical
condition of each applicant were stated
and discussed in detail in the August
29, 2012, Federal Register notice and
they will not be repeated in this notice.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received two comments in
this proceeding. Mr. Lyle Brandstrom
stated that he had worked with Daniel
John Gladen and is in favor of granting
him a Federal Diabetes exemption.
According to Mr. Brandstrom, Mr.
Gladen is a dedicated and responsible
driver.
Mr. Curtus Sherman stated that he
had worked with Daniel John Gladen
and is in favor of granting him a Federal
Diabetes exemption. According to Mr.
Sherman, Mr. Gladen is a dedicated and
responsible driver.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to
achieve an equivalent or greater level of
safety than would be achieved without
the exemption. The exemption allows
the applicants to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the
applicants’ ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists’
medical opinion related to the ability of
the driver to safely operate a CMV while
using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in
each case exempting these applicants
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the
exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document
and they include the following: (1) That
each individual submit a quarterly
monitoring checklist completed by the
treating endocrinologist as well as an
annual checklist with a comprehensive
medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business
days of occurrence, all episodes of
severe hypoglycemia, significant
complications, or inability to manage
diabetes; also, any involvement in an
accident or any other adverse event in
a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or
not it is related to an episode of
hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
64586
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Notices
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (4) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Conclusion
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Based upon its evaluation of the 28
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Anthony J. Annatone (FL),
Trevor J. Corley (TX), Shannon K.
Ellingsworth (KY), Richard T. Ewell
(IL), Norman S. Forsythe (WI), Patrick D.
Fortier (MN), Daniel J. Gladen (MN),
Walter V. Gruba (VA), Marshall D.
Howell (MI), Larry Knox (AK), Roger P.
LaFever (WI), Blaze E. Lampman (NY),
William R. Lawrence (MT), Duane J.
Mullins (WI), Louis R. Noellsch (WA),
Darrin W. Pettis (WA), Michael J.
Raposa (MA), Jeremy K. Redger (LA),
Anthony E. Reed (MO), Earl L. Slater
(NY), Keith J. Tavares (MA), Phillip L.
Truitt (MD), Gregory H. Tullock (NJ),
Michael D. Underwood (AL), Raffaele
Vano (NY), Brian D. Weeden (NH),
David A. Weinbroer (KY) and Robert J.
Westover (WI) from the ITDM
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3),
subject to the conditions listed under
‘‘Conditions and Requirements’’ above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315 each exemption will be valid
for two years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if the following occurs: (1) The person
fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the 1/exemption; (2) the
exemption has resulted in a lower level
of safety than was maintained before it
was granted; or (3) continuation of the
exemption would not be consistent with
the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is
still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA
for a renewal under procedures in effect
at that time.
Issued on: October 9, 2012.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–25911 Filed 10–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Limitation on Claims Against Proposed
Public Transportation Projects
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces final
environmental actions taken by the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
for projects in the following locations:
Los Angeles County, CA; San Antonio,
TX; Prince George’s County, MD; and
Chicago, IL. The purpose of this notice
is to announce publicly the
environmental decisions by FTA on the
subject projects and to activate the
limitation on any claims that may
challenge these final environmental
actions.
DATES: By this notice, FTA is advising
the public of final agency actions
subject to Section 139(l) of Title 23,
United States Code (U.S.C.). A claim
seeking judicial review of the FTA
actions announced herein for the listed
public transportation project will be
barred unless the claim is filed on or
before March 21, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy-Ellen Zusman, Assistant Chief
Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, (312)
353–2577 or Terence Plaskon,
Environmental Protection Specialist,
Office of Human and Natural
Environment, (202) 366–0442. FTA is
located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are
from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., EDT,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that FTA has taken final
agency actions by issuing certain
approvals for the public transportation
projects listed below. The actions on
these projects, as well as the laws under
which such actions were taken, are
described in the documentation issued
in connection with the project to
comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
in other documents in the FTA
administrative record for the projects.
Interested parties may contact either the
project sponsor or the relevant FTA
Regional Office for more information on
the project. Contact information for
FTA’s Regional Offices may be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
This notice applies to all FTA
decisions on the listed projects as of the
issuance date of this notice and all laws
under which such actions were taken,
including, but not limited to, NEPA [42
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 4321–4375], Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303], Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act [16
U.S.C. 470f], and the Clean Air Act [42
U.S.C. 7401–7671q]. This notice does
not, however, alter or extend the
limitation period of 180 days for
challenges of project decisions subject
to previous notices published in the
Federal Register. For example, this
notice does not extend the limitation on
claims announced for earlier decisions
on the Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor
Project. The projects and actions that are
the subject of this notice are:
1. Project name and location:
Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Project,
Los Angeles, CA. Project sponsor: Los
Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (LACMTA).
Project description: The project will
extend from the existing Metro
Exposition Line at Crenshaw and
Exposition Boulevards and travel 8.5
miles to the Metro Green Line’s
Aviation/LAX Station. The project
includes six transit stations, a vehicle
maintenance storage facility, park-andride lots, traction power substations,
and the acquisition of rail vehicles and
maintenance equipment. Modifications
to the project design have occurred
during the preliminary engineering
phase to reduce cost, reduce right-ofway impacts, reduce utility impacts,
improve light rail transit operations, and
improve traffic circulation and
pedestrian crossings. The project
modifications include a shift in the
location of the optional Crenshaw/
Vernon Station and Florence/Hindry
Station (formerly Manchester/Aviation
Station), street/driveway/sidewalk
modifications, pedestrian crossing
improvements, and a shift of a portion
of the alignment into the former
Burlington Northern Santa Fe right-ofway. This would require demolition of
two railroad bridges and partial
acquisitions. This action is on the
September 2012 Finding of No
Significant Impact. Nothing in this
notice affects FTA’s previous decisions,
or notice thereof, for this project. More
specifically, the statute of limitations for
the approvals documented in the
project’s December 30, 2011 Record of
Decision and the environmental
documents on which it is based expired
on August 6, 2012, as noticed in the
Federal Register on February 8, 2012
(77 FR 6624). This notice only applies
to the actions taken by FTA at this time
as described below. Final agency
actions: no use of Section 4(f) resources;
Section 106 finding of no adverse effect;
project-level air quality conformity; and
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 204 (Monday, October 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64585-64586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25911]
[[Page 64585]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2012-0218]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 28 individuals from its
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective October 22, 2012. The exemptions
expire on October 22, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64-224, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, or other
entity). You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
Background
On August 29, 2012, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from 28 individuals and requested
comments from the public (77 FR 52384). The public comment period
closed on September 28, 2012, and two comments were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 28 applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals With Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus To Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
These 28 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 46 years.
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case,
an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a
willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus,
received education related to diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying
conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the
vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the August 29, 2012, Federal Register
notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received two comments in this proceeding. Mr. Lyle Brandstrom
stated that he had worked with Daniel John Gladen and is in favor of
granting him a Federal Diabetes exemption. According to Mr. Brandstrom,
Mr. Gladen is a dedicated and responsible driver.
Mr. Curtus Sherman stated that he had worked with Daniel John
Gladen and is in favor of granting him a Federal Diabetes exemption.
According to Mr. Sherman, Mr. Gladen is a dedicated and responsible
driver.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's
[[Page 64586]]
or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time of the
annual medical examination; and (4) that each individual provide a copy
of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in
the driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's
qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must also
have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a
duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 28 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Anthony J. Annatone (FL), Trevor J. Corley (TX), Shannon K.
Ellingsworth (KY), Richard T. Ewell (IL), Norman S. Forsythe (WI),
Patrick D. Fortier (MN), Daniel J. Gladen (MN), Walter V. Gruba (VA),
Marshall D. Howell (MI), Larry Knox (AK), Roger P. LaFever (WI), Blaze
E. Lampman (NY), William R. Lawrence (MT), Duane J. Mullins (WI), Louis
R. Noellsch (WA), Darrin W. Pettis (WA), Michael J. Raposa (MA), Jeremy
K. Redger (LA), Anthony E. Reed (MO), Earl L. Slater (NY), Keith J.
Tavares (MA), Phillip L. Truitt (MD), Gregory H. Tullock (NJ), Michael
D. Underwood (AL), Raffaele Vano (NY), Brian D. Weeden (NH), David A.
Weinbroer (KY) and Robert J. Westover (WI) from the ITDM requirement in
49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject to the conditions listed under
``Conditions and Requirements'' above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption will
be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption
will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply
with the terms and conditions of the 1/exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the
exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the
person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at
that time.
Issued on: October 9, 2012.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-25911 Filed 10-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P