Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Certain Special Permits and Competent Authorities Into Regulations, 64450-64461 [2012-25853]
Download as PDF
64450
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
D Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
D U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
People With Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
Federal Communications Commission.
Ruth Milkman,
Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
Julius Knapp,
Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2012–25825 Filed 10–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 107, 172, 173, 175, and
178
[Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0158 (HM–233C)]
RIN 2137–AE82
Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of
Certain Special Permits and
Competent Authorities Into
Regulations
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
Materials Regulations to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits
and certain competent authority
approvals (‘‘approvals’’) that have
established safety records. Special
permits allow a company or individual
to package or ship a hazardous material
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
in a manner that varies from the
regulations provided an equivalent level
of safety is maintained. An approval is
a written consent (document) required
under an international standard (i.e.,
International Maritime Dangerous
Goods (IMDG) Code, International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO)), or is
specifically provided for in the HMR,
and is issued by the Associate
Administrator for Hazardous Materials
Safety. These proposed revisions are
intended to provide wider access to the
regulatory flexibility offered in special
permits and approvals and eliminate the
need for numerous renewal requests,
reducing paperwork burdens and
facilitating commerce while maintaining
an appropriate level of safety.
Additionally, this rulemaking will
address three petitions for rulemaking
regarding the continued use of renewal
applications for long standing special
permits.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before December 21,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by identification of the docket number
(PHMSA–2011–0158; HM–233C) by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: To Docket
Operations, Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice at the beginning
of the comment. All comments received
will be posted without change to the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS), including any personal
information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or DOT’s Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Andrews, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Standards and
Rulemaking Division, (202) 366–8553,
or, Diane LaValle, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Approvals and Permits
Division, (202) 366–4535, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Overview of Proposed Amendments
IV. Summary Review of Amendments
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Executive Summary
PHMSA is proposing to amend the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR;
49 CFR parts 171–180) to incorporate
several long standing special permit and
competent authorities into the HMR.
The identified special permits and
competent authorities have a long
history of safety. Special permits allow
a company or individual to package or
ship a hazardous material in a manner
that varies from the hazardous materials
regulations (HMR) provided an
equivalent level of safety is maintained.
A competent authority (CA) approval is
a written consent (document) required
under an international standard (i.e.,
International Maritime Dangerous
Goods (IMDG) code or International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)) and
is issued by the Associate Administrator
for Hazardous Materials Safety.
In 2009, an audit of the Special
Permits program by the Office of the
Inspector General identified a need for
an ongoing review of all open special
permits with an outlook towards
identifying those that should be made
part of the HMR to reduce the overall
economic burden to both affected
industry and the government. Four
rulemakings, HM–233A (75 FR 27205),
HM–245 (76 FR 5483), and HM–216B
(77 FR 37962) have successfully
codified certain special permits into the
HMR. These revisions provided wider
access to the regulatory flexibility
offered in special permits and eliminate
the need for numerous renewal requests,
thus reducing paperwork burdens and
facilitating commerce while maintaining
an appropriate level of safety.
This notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM), HM–233C, continues this
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
initiative by proposing to incorporate
several additional long-standing special
permits and competent authority
approvals with proven safety records
into the HMR. The special permits
affected by the proposed rule represent
variances from current regulations on
topics categorized as follows:
• Limited quantities of liquids and
solids containing ethyl alcohol.
• Transportation of solid coal tar
pitch compounds.
• Transportation of certain ammonia
solutions in UN1H1 and UN6HA1
drums.
• Transportation of spent bleaching
earth.
• Requalification of non-DOT
specification cylinders in life-saving
appliances.
• Use of regulated medical waste
containers displaying alternative
markings.
• Incorporation of Oxygen Generator
special permits to harmonize with FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.
The economic impact of the proposed
rule can thus be summarized as follows:
NET Cost: $0. Currently, industry must
apply for a special permit in order to
ship materials as described in this
NPRM. Incorporation of these special
permits into the HMR will reduce the
burden on industry by no longer
requiring industry to apply for a special
permit to ship these materials.
Therefore, this proposed rule does not
impose any new costs to industry.
NET Benefits: $4,539 per year.
(Averaged over 10 years, at a 7% annual
discount rate.)
In addition to general positive
economic impacts noted above, there
are known benefits by the elimination of
the need for numerous party-to
applications and renewal requests.
PHMSA estimates that the incorporation
of these special permits and competent
authority approvals will result in 140
fewer responses per year.
II. Background
PHMSA is proposing to amend the
HMR to incorporate certain
requirements based on existing special
permits (SPs) issued by PHMSA under
49 CFR Part 107, Subpart B (§§ 107.101
to 107.127) and certain approvals issued
under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart D
(§§ 107.401 to 107.405). A special
permit sets forth alternative
requirements—or a variance—to the
requirements in the HMR in a way that
achieves a safety level at least equal to
the safety level required under the
regulations or that is consistent with the
public interest. See 49 CFR 107.105(d).
Congress expressly authorized DOT to
issue these variances in the Hazardous
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
Materials Transportation Act (US Code:
49 USC 5109–5127) as amended. An
approval is a written consent
(document) required under an
international standard (i.e., IMDG Code,
ICAO), or is authorized in a specific
section of the HMR and is issued by the
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety.
Special Permits
The HMR generally are performanceoriented regulations, which provide the
regulated community with some
flexibility in meeting safety
requirements. Even so, not every
transportation situation can be
anticipated and built into the
regulations. Innovation is the strength of
our economy and the hazardous
materials community is a leader in
developing new materials and
technologies and innovative ways of
moving materials. Special permits
enable the hazardous materials industry
to quickly, effectively, and safely
integrate new products and technologies
into production and the transportation
stream. Thus, special permits provide a
mechanism for testing new
technologies, promoting increased
transportation efficiency and
productivity, and ensuring global
competitiveness. Hazardous materials
transported under the terms of a special
permit must achieve a level of safety at
least equal to the level of safety
achieved when transported under the
HMR or that is consistent with the
public interest. Implementation of new
technologies and operational techniques
may enhance safety. Special permits
also reduce the volume and complexity
of the HMR by addressing unique or
infrequent transportation situations that
would be difficult to accommodate in
regulations intended for use by a wide
range of shippers and carriers.
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of
special permits to identify widely used
and longstanding special permits with
established safety records for conversion
into regulations of broader applicability.
Converting these special permits into
regulations reduces paperwork burdens
and facilitates commerce while
maintaining an acceptable level of
safety. Additionally, adoption of special
permits as rules of general applicability
provides wider access to the benefits
and regulatory flexibility of the
provisions granted in the special
permits. Factors that influence whether
or not a specific special permit is a
candidate for regulatory action include:
the safety record for hazardous materials
transported or operations conducted
under a special permit; potential broad
application of a special permit;
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64451
suitability of provisions in the special
permit for incorporation into the HMR;
rulemaking activity in related areas; and
agency priorities.
The special permits addressed in this
NPRM have hundreds of party status
holders. Party status is granted to a
person who intends to offer for
transportation or transport a hazardous
material or perform an activity subject
to the HMR in the same manner as the
original applicant.
The proposed amendments will
eliminate the need for approximately
464 current holders to reapply for
renewal of 20 special permits. This will
also reduce the burden on PHMSA to
process renewal applications. These
proposals will also apply to any special
permits this agency issues during the
development of this rulemaking whose
provisions are identical in every respect
to those described in the rulemakings
issued under this docket. To emphasize
this, we preface the description of the
affected special permits with the
wording ‘‘include’’ or ‘‘includes’’ to
clarify that additional special permits
issued after the publication of this
NPRM that are identical in every aspect
as those specifically listed in this NPRM
may be incorporated under these
amendments.
Incorporation of the special permits
into the HMR eliminates significant
paperwork burdens. As a condition of a
special permit issued by PHMSA and
depending on the provisions of the
special permit, a copy of each special
permit must be: (1) Maintained at each
facility where an operation is conducted
or a packaging is manufactured under a
special permit; (2) maintained at each
facility where a package is offered or reoffered for transportation under a
special permit; and (3) in some cases,
carried aboard each transport vehicle
used to transport a hazardous material
under a special permit.
Competent Authority Approvals
The HMR also allows for PHMSA to
grant approvals to companies or
organizations for the manufacturing of
packages in accordance with the HMR.
PHMSA has identified approvals that
have an established safety record to
incorporate into the HMR. The
approvals PHMSA identified for
conversion into the HMR have an
established safety record and warrant
incorporation into regulations of
broader applicability. Converting these
approvals into regulations reduces
paperwork burdens and facilitates
commerce while maintaining an
acceptable level of safety. A copy of
each approval must be maintained at
each facility where a packaging is
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
64452
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
manufactured under this approval. The
incorporation of component authority
approval eliminates the renewal and
maintenance requirements that were
previously required. Additionally,
adoption of approvals as rules of general
applicability provides wider access to
the benefits and regulatory flexibility of
the provisions granted in the approvals.
Factors that influence whether a specific
approval is a candidate for regulatory
action include: the safety record,
whether broadly applicable, related
rulemakings, and agency priorities.
III. Overview of Proposed Amendments
In this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to
revise the HMR by providing:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Special Permits
• DOT–SP 9275—Authorization for
the transportation in commerce of
certain limited quantities of liquids and
solids containing ethyl alcohol and
exempt these shipments from the
provisions of the HMR.
• DOT–SP 11263—Authorization for
the transportation of Class 9 solid coal
pitch compounds in non-specification
open-top or closed-top sift proof metal
cans or fiber drums.
• DOT–SP 11836—Authorization for
the transportation in commerce of
UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums containing
ammonia solutions that do not meet
certain requirements contained in
§§ 173.24 and 173.24a.
• DOT–SP 13124—Authorizations for
the transportation of ammonia solutions
in UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums by
private or contract carrier.
• DOT–SP 12134—Authorization of
exceptions for spent bleaching earth
(Division 4.2 PG III).
• DOT–SP 12825—Authorization for
the transportation of Life-saving
appliances, self inflating, that contain
non-specification steel cylinders
between a vessel and an authorized
facility for servicing.
• DOT–SP 14479—Authorization for
the use of alternative shipping names
and marking requirements for regulated
medical wastes.
• Special Permits for Harmonization
with the ‘‘FAA Modernization and
Reform Act of 2012’’—PHMSA is adding
an exception to the HMR for Oxygen
cylinders and other Oxidizing cylinders
transported aboard aircraft within the
state of Alaska. This language will make
several existing special permits no
longer necessary. This includes the
following special permits: 14903, 14908,
15062, 15075, 15076, 15077, 15078,
15079, 15092, 15094, 15095, and 15143.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
Approvals
• CA2005120010—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis
weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the measured basis
weight in the initial design qualification
test report.
• CA20060660005—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN5M1
and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with
individual paper wall basis weights that
vary by plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weights reported in the
initial design qualification test report.
• CA2006060006—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights
that vary by plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weight reported in the
initial design.
• CA2006010012—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weight
that vary by plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weight reported in the
initial design qualification test report.
Revision to Approvals Renewals
• PHMSA is proposing to revise this
section to allow for approval holders
applying for a timely renewal to
continue using their approval after the
expiration date if they apply within 60
days of the expiration dates.
IV. Summary Review of Amendments
A. Limited Quantities of Liquids and
Solids Containing Ethyl Alcohol
DOT–SP 9275 authorized the
transportation in commerce of certain
limited quantities of liquids and solids
containing ethyl alcohol and exempts
these shipments from the provisions of
HMR. This special permit has been in
effect since at least 1985 and had been
utilized by hundreds of companies.
However, on August 18, 2011 PHMSA
found that SP 9275 did not provide a
level of safety at least equivalent to the
HMR due to the lack of hazard
communications markings. PHMSA
issued a revised version of SP 9275 to
address the lack of hazard
communication markings on August 18,
2011.
This rulemaking also will address two
petitions for rulemaking related to SP
9275. A petition from the Association of
Hazmat Shippers (AHS) (P–1574)
requests PHMSA to incorporate the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provisions of SP 9275. A petition for
rulemaking was also received from the
Council on Safe Transportation of
Hazardous Articles (COSTHA) (P–1585)
to incorporate SP 9275. COSTHA and
the AHS noted that SP 9275 has been in
existence for 30 years with little
evidence of incidents involving the
packaging, shipment, or operations
conducted under the SP. Both of these
petitions were supportive of
incorporating the provisions of SP 9275
into the HMR.
Therefore, PHMSA is proposing to
incorporate the terms of SP 9275 as
revised on August 18, 2011. PHMSA is
proposing to allow certain limited
quantities of ethyl alcohol to be
exempted from the applicable
provisions of the HMR provided that the
outer packagings are marked with
hazard communication information
identifying the company name and the
words ‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol.’’
PHMSA is proposing to add § 173.151(g)
to allow for the shipment of limited
quantities of ethyl alcohol provided
they meet the prescribed conditions.
B. Transportation of Solid Coal Tar
Pitch Compounds
DOT–SP 11263 authorizes the
transportation of solid coal tar pitch
compounds, Class 9, in open-top and
closed-top sift-proof metal cans or fiber
drums. The special permit has been in
effect since 1994 and has been utilized
by 5 holders with an acceptable safety
performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents over the past 10
years involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of DOT–SP 11263 into the HMR
by amending the entry in § 172.101, The
Hazardous Materials Table (HMT), for
Environmentally hazardous substances,
solids, n.o.s., UN 3077, by adding a new
Special Provision N91 in Column 7. In
addition, in § 172.102 new Special
Provision N91 would be added in
appropriate sequence specifically
authorizing the use of a non-DOT
specification sift-proof, non-bulk, metal
can with or without lid, or a non-DOT
specification sift-proof, non-bulk fiber
drum, with or without lid. The fiber
drum would be required to be fabricated
with a three ply wall, as a minimum.
The coal tar pitch compound must
remain in a solid mass during
transportation.
C. Transportation of Certain Ammonia
Solutions in UN1H1 Drums, UN3H1
Jerricans, and UN6HA1 Composite
Packagings
DOT–SP 11836 authorizes the
transportation of specific ammonia
solutions in specification UN1H1
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packagings that do not meet
the provisions in §§ 173.24 and 173.24a.
Specific operational controls are
required in lieu of compliance with
these two requirements. This special
permit has been in effect since 1997 and
has been utilized by at least 61 holders
with an acceptable safety performance.
In addition, PHMSA has no reported
incidents over the past 10 years
involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of DOT–SP 11836 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for
Ammonia solutions, relative density
between 0.880 and 0.957 at 15 degrees
C in water, with more than 10 percent
but not more than 35 percent ammonia,
UN 2672, by adding a new Special
Provision 336 in Column 7. In addition,
in § 172.102 new Special Provision 336
would be added in appropriate
sequence specifically authorizing the
use of DOT UN1H1drums, UN3H1
jerricans, and UN6HA1 composite
packagings which meet the
requirements of Part 178 of the HMR at
the Packing Group I or II performance
level except that the packagings do not
meet the venting requirements in
§ 173.24(g) and the hydrostatic pressure
test marking specified in § 173.24a(b)(4).
Transportation of these packages would
also require the door of each van trailer
to be marked with ‘‘Warning trailer may
contain chemical vapor. Do not enter
until vapors have dissipated.’’ The
driver of the transport vehicle and the
consignee(s) must be trained not to enter
the transport vehicle until the ammonia
vapors have dissipated, and the
emergency response paper must
indicate that the vehicle may contain
ammonia vapors.
D. Transportation of Spent Bleaching
Earth
DOT–SP 12134 authorizes the
transportation of spent bleaching earth
as a Division 4.2, solid, PG III, exempt
from the provisions of the HMR, except
as specifically required by the special
permit. Packagings authorized under the
special permit are non-specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type vehicles,
and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins.
All authorized packaging must be
covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or
equivalent means during transportation.
The special permit also includes
specific operational controls, including:
The temperature of the spent bleaching
earth may not exceed 55 °C at the time
it is offered for transportation and any
time during transportation; drivers must
be specifically trained in handling and
responding to emergency incidents
involving the spent bleaching earth; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
transport vehicles must be marked in
accordance with § 172.302(a). This
special permit has been in effect since
1999 and has been utilized by at least
27 holders with an acceptable safety
performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents over the past 10
years involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of DOT–SP 12134 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for
self-heating solid, organic, n.o.s. (spent
bleaching earth), UN 3088, by adding a
new Special Provision, B116 in Column
7. In addition, in § 172.102 new Special
Provision B116 would be added in
appropriate sequence specifically
authorizing the use of non specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type motor
vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off
bulk bins, which must be covered by a
tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent
means. The material would also be
subject to operational controls including
not exceeding a temperature of 55 °C
(130 °F) during transportation, not
exceeding a transportation time of 24
hours, and drivers transporting spent
bleaching earth must be trained in the
properties and hazards of the spent
bleaching earth and the actions required
to mitigate the self-heating properties of
the material that may occur during the
transportation.
E. Requalification of Non-DOT
Specification Cylinders in Life-Saving
Appliances
DOT–SP 12825 authorizes the
transportation of life-saving appliances,
self inflating, that contain non-DOT
specification steel cylinders for the
purpose of movement between a vessel
and a U.S. Coast Guard approved
inflatable life raft servicing facility in
conjunction with the servicing of such
life-saving appliances. Specific
operational controls are specified. This
special permit has been in effect since
2001 and has been utilized by at least
54 holders with acceptable safety
performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents since 2001
involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of DOT–SP 12825 into the HMR
by revising the entry in the HMT for
Life-saving appliances, self inflating,
UN 2990, by adding a new Special
Provision 338 in Column 7. In addition,
in § 172.102, new Special Provision 338
would be added in appropriate
sequence requiring that Life-saving
appliances, self inflating, UN 2990 being
shipped between a vessel and a U.S.
Coast Guard approved life raft servicing
facility only be subject to the
requirements of this special provision.
A material meeting the requirements of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64453
the special provision would not
otherwise be subject to the HMR.
F. Use of Regulated Medical Waste
Containers Displaying Alternative
Markings
DOT–SP 14479 authorizes the
continued use of regulated medical
waste containers manufactured before
October 1, 2006 and marked with an
alternative shipping name for UN 3291
and orientation arrows that deviate from
prescribed specifications. This special
permit has been in effect since 2007 and
has been utilized by at least 22 holders.
In addition, PHMSA has no reported
incidents since 2007 involving this
special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of DOT–SP 14479 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for
Regulated Medical Waste, n.o.s., UN
3088, by adding a new Special
Provision, 337 in Column 7. Special
Provision 337 would allow for the use
of regulated waste containers marked
with the alternative shipping name of
Regulated medical waste, UN 3291 and
orientation arrows that deviate from the
prescribed specifications in
§ 172.312(a)(2).
G. Incorporation of Oxygen Generator
Special Permits To Harmonize With
FAA Modernization and Reform Act of
2012
Section 824 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
includes a provision that allows for
exceptions for cylinders of compressed
oxygen or other oxidizing gases
transported in the State of Alaska
aboard aircraft. By incorporating this
statutory exception into the HMR,
PHMSA believes that following special
permits will no longer be necessary:
14903, 14908, 15062, 15075, 15076,
15077, 15078, 15079, 15092, 15094,
15095, and 15143. These special permits
all provided exceptions for the
transportation of Oxygen and other
Division 2.2 Oxidizing gases for
transportation aboard aircraft in the
state of Alaska. PHSMA proposes to
incorporate the terms of these special
permits in § 175.34.
H. Competent Authority CA2005120010
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This approval authorizes the
manufacturing, marking, and selling of
UN4G combination packagings with
outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis
weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the measured basis
weight in the initial design qualification
test report. This approval was issued in
2009 and has demonstrated an
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
64454
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA
has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA proposes to
incorporate the terms of CA2005120010
into the HMR in § 178.516(b)(7).
I. Competent Authority CA2006060005
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This approval authorizes the
manufacture, mark, and sale of UN5M1
and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with
individual paper wall basis weights that
vary by not more than plus or minus 5%
from the nominal basis weights reported
in the initial design qualification test
report. This approval was issued in
2009 and has demonstrated an
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA
has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA proposes to
incorporate the terms of CA2006060005
in § 178.521(b)(4).
J. Competent Authority CA2006060006
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This approval authorizes the
manufacture, mark, and sale of UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights
that vary by not more than plus or
minus 5% from the nominal basis
weight reported in the initial design.
This approval was issued in 2009 and
has demonstrated an acceptable safety
performance. PHMSA has no reported
incidents involving this approval.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of CA2006060006 in
§ 178.516(b)(7).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
K. Competent Authority CA2006010012
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This competent authority authorizes
the manufacture, mark, and sale of
UN4G combination packagings with
outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weight
that vary by not more than plus or
minus 5% from the nominal basis
weight reported in the initial design
qualification test report. This approval
was issued in 2006 and has
demonstrated an acceptable safety
performance. PHMSA has no reported
incidents involving this approval.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of CA2006010012 in
§ 178.516(b)(7).
L. Revision of § 107.709 for Renewing
Approvals
PHMSA is proposing to revise this
section to allow approval holders
applying for a renewal to continue using
their approval after the expiration date
if they apply at least 60 days before the
expiration date. PHMSA received a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
petition (P–1571) from Lawrence
Bierlein that requested this change. This
petition was accepted and HMR
language is being proposed.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This NPRM is published under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b) which
authorizes the Secretary to prescribe
regulations for the safe transportation,
including security, of hazardous
material in intrastate, interstate, and
foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b),
5104, 5110, or 5112 of the Federal
Hazardous Materials Transportation
Law to a person transporting, or causing
to be transported, hazardous material in
a way that achieves a safety level at least
equal to the safety level required under
the law, or consistent with the public
interest, if a required safety level does
not exist. The proposed rule would
amend the regulations by incorporating
provisions from certain widely used and
longstanding special permits that have
established a history of safety and
which may, therefore, be converted into
the regulations for general use.
B. Executive Order 12866, 13563, and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is considered a
non-significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) and was reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The proposed rule is considered
a non-significant rule under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
order issued by the Department of
Transportation [44 FR 11034]. Executive
Order 13563 is supplemental to and
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review
that were established in Executive Order
12866 Regulatory Planning and Review
of September 30, 1993. By building off
of each other, these two Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 require
agencies to regulate in the ‘‘most costeffective manner,’’ to make a ‘‘reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs,’’
and to develop regulations that ‘‘impose
the least burden on society.’’
In this notice, PHMSA proposes to
amend the HMR to incorporate
alternatives this agency has permitted
under widely used and longstanding
special permits and approvals with
established safety records that we have
determined meet the safety criteria for
inclusion in the HMR. Incorporation of
these special permits and approvals into
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulations of general applicability will
provide shippers and carriers with
additional flexibility to comply with
established safety requirements, thereby
reducing transportation costs and
increasing productivity. In addition, the
proposed rule would reduce the
paperwork burden on industry and this
agency resulting from putting an end to
the need for renewal applications for
special permits. Taken together, the
provisions of this proposed rule would
promote the continued safe
transportation of hazardous materials
while reducing transportation costs for
the industry and administrative costs for
the agency.
The impact of this proposed rule is
presumed to be minor as no new costs
will be imposed upon any stakeholders
and those that currently hold special
permits and CAs will find some relief
from regulatory review for current
practices. This proposed rule would
make provisions that are currently
approved in certain special permits
available to all businesses operating in
the U.S. without needing to submit
party-to special permit applications to
PHMSA, and current permit holders
will no longer need renewals. Over the
past decade, approximately 464
companies have applied for and/or
renewed the special permits included in
this proposal. Many of these special
permits have had positive economic
impacts by allowing companies to be
excepted from requirements in the HMR
when shipping certain quantities/types
of materials or by allowing the use of
less expensive non-specification
packages when certain provisions are
met. It is difficult to quantify the savings
these special permits have allowed, but
it should be noted that these savings
would be extended to other firms that
would make use of the provisions once
adopted into regulations. PHMSA
calculates that this rulemaking would
result in a paperwork reduction that, on
average, saves each applicant $39.50.
PHMSA estimates that over a 10-year
period there will be an estimated benefit
total totaling $18,328 affecting
approximately 140 entities. In
accordance with the Federal hazardous
materials law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.),
initial issuances of special permits are
for two years and can be renewed for
four years thereafter. Thus, over 10
years, a special permit would on average
be renewed twice for a total benefit of
between $43,000 and $47,000. These
figures are discounted annually by 3
and 7 percent to reflect the time value
of money.
This Notice also proposes to
incorporate four approvals into the
HMR. This would allow manufacturers
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
of affected hazardous materials
packaging to continue manufacturing
packages without the need to renew
their approvals. Incorporation of the
four approvals would result in a onetime total economic benefit of $158. The
renewal cycle for approvals can vary
based on the applicant needs and
regulatory authority, but are typically
renewed every five years. At both 3 and
7 percent annual discount, this yields
over $270 in benefits. Total benefits
represent a small but positive sum
(between $46,000 and $52,000) over 10
years affecting approximately 140
entities.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This proposed
rule would preempt state, local and
Indian tribe requirements but does not
propose any regulation that has
substantial direct effects on the states,
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments. Therefore, the
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
Federal hazardous material
transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101–
5128, contains an express preemption
provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b))
preempting state, local and Indian tribe
requirements on certain covered
subjects. Covered subjects are:
(1) The designation, description, and
classification of hazardous materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling,
labeling, marking, and placarding of
hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and
use of shipping documents related to
hazardous materials and requirements
related to the number, contents, and
placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification,
recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation
of hazardous materials; or
(5) The designing, manufacturing,
fabricating, inspecting, marking,
maintaining, reconditioning, repairing,
or testing a package, container or
packaging component that is
represented, marked, certified, or sold
as qualified for use in transporting
hazardous material in commerce.
This proposed rule addresses covered
subject items (2), (3), and (5) and would
preempt any State, local, or Indian tribe
requirements not meeting the
‘‘substantively the same’’ standard.
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
64455
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this proposed rule does not
have tribal implications and does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
waste, transporters of limited quantities
of ethyl alcohol, and airlines
transporting oxygen generators, without
compromising transportation safety and
should provide a slight positive
economic benefit (i.e., reduced
compliance burden) for those small
entities. Therefore, we certify that this
proposed rulemaking will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For
example, special permit 9275 will no
longer require businesses to apply for a
special permit in order to ship common
retail items such as cosmetics that
would normally be shipped as a class 3
material.
This proposed rule has been
developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (‘‘Proper Consideration of
Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking’’)
and DOT’s procedures and policies to
promote compliance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that
potential impacts of draft rules on small
entities are properly considered.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact
on small entities. An agency must
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis
unless it determines and certifies that a
rule is not expected to have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule incorporates
into the HMR certain widely used
special permits. Incorporation of these
special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide
shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established
safety requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. Entities affected by the
proposed rule conceivably include all
persons—shippers, carriers, and
others—who offer and/or transport in
commerce hazardous materials. The
specific focus of the rule is on the
incorporation of special permits into the
HMR. In a review of the companies
using the identified special permits,
PHMSA identified a combination of
small and large businesses that would
be affected positively by this
rulemaking. For example, the proposed
rulemaking excepts certain shipments
from the specific documentation
requirements of the HMR; these
exceptions will increase shipping
options and reduce shipment costs.
Overall, this proposed rule should
reduce the compliance burden on the
regulated industries, such as small
businesses that dispose of medical
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has an approved information
collection under OMB Control Number
2137–0051, ‘‘Rulemaking, Special
Permits, and Preemption
Requirements.’’ This NPRM may result
in a decrease in the annual burden and
costs under this information collection
due to proposed changes to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits
that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control
number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5, Code
of Federal Regulations requires that
PHMSA provide interested members of
the public and affected agencies an
opportunity to comment on information
and recordkeeping requests.
This proposed rule identifies a
revised information collection request
that PHMSA will submit to OMB for
approval based on the requirements in
this proposed rule. PHMSA has
developed burden estimates to reflect
changes in this proposed rule. PHMSA
estimates that the information collection
and recordkeeping burden of this
proposed rule is as follows:
OMB Control No. 2137–0051:
Net Decrease in Annual Number of
Respondents: 434.
Net Decrease in Annual Responses:
434.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden
Hours: 434.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Costs:
$17,143.
5125(b)(2) that if PHMSA issues a
regulation concerning any of the
covered subjects, PHMSA must
determine and publish in the Federal
Register the effective date of Federal
preemption. The effective date may not
be earlier than the 90th day following
the date of issuance of the final rule and
not later than two years after the date of
issuance. PHMSA proposes the effective
date of federal preemption will be 90
days from publication of the final rule
in this matter in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
64456
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
PHMSA specifically requests
comments on the information collection
and recordkeeping burdens associated
with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for
approval under this proposed rule.
Requests for a copy of this
information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards (PHH–11), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, Telephone (202) 366–8553.
Address written comments to the
Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking.
We must receive comments regarding
information collection burdens prior to
the close of the comment period
identified in the DATES section of this
rulemaking. In addition, you may
submit comments specifically related to
the information collection burden to the
PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at fax number
(202) 395–6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN contained in the heading
of this document may be used to crossreference this action with the Unified
Agenda.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either state,
local or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, and
is the least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4375, requires that
federal agencies analyze proposed
actions to determine whether the action
will have a significant impact on the
human environment. The Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations requires federal agencies to
conduct an environmental review
considering (1) the need for the
proposed action (2) alternatives to the
proposed action (3) probable
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives and (4) the
agencies and persons consulted during
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
the consideration process. 40 CFR
1508.9(b).
The Need for the Proposed Action
This Notice proposes to allow
transportation of the following
hazardous materials and packages in
ways that vary from certain other
provisions in the HMR: UN 3291
medical waste, non-DOT specification
steel cylinders for use in life-saving
appliances, limited quantities of liquids
and solids containing ethyl alcohol,
UN3077 coal tar pitch compounds, UN
3088 spent bleaching earth, UN 2672
ammonia solutions, and compressed
gases with a subsidiary hazard of 5.1.
These hazardous materials are capable
of affecting human health and the
environment if a release were to occur.
However, incorporation of these special
permits maintains an equivalent level of
safety as provided in the special
permits. These special permits have a
long history of transporting the above
mentioned hazardous materials safely
and without any effects on the
environment. Therefore, we do not
anticipate any significant positive or
negative impacts on the environment by
incorporating these special permits into
the HMR.
The need for hazardous materials to
support essential services means
transportation of highly hazardous
materials is unavoidable. However,
these shipments frequently move
through densely populated or
environmentally sensitive areas where
the consequences of an incident could
be loss of life, serious injury, or
significant environmental damage. The
ecosystems that also could be affected
by a hazardous materials release during
transportation include atmospheric,
aquatic, terrestrial, and vegetal
resources (for example, wildlife
habitats). The adverse environmental
impacts associated with releases of most
hazardous materials are short-term
impacts that can be greatly reduced or
eliminated through prompt clean-up of
the incident scene.
In all modes of transport, the potential
for environmental damage or
contamination exists when packages of
hazardous materials are involved in
transportation incidents. The special
permits and approvals being proposed
for incorporating into the HMR have
consistently demonstrated a long history
of safe use. In its review of these special
permits and approval, PHMSA did not
identify any incidents that had a
significant effect on the environment.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
The purpose and need of this
rulemaking is to incorporate widely
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
used special permits or those with an
established safety record into the HMR
for universal use. More information
about benefits of this final rulemaking
action can be found in the preamble
(i.e., ‘‘Overview of Proposed
Amendments) to this rulemaking. The
alternatives considered in the analysis
include (1) the proposed action, that is,
incorporation of the proposed special
permits as amendments to the HMR; (2)
incorporation of some subset of the
proposed special permits (i.e., only
some of the proposed special permits) as
amendments to the HMR; and (3) the
‘‘no action’’ alternative, meaning that
none of the proposed special permits
would be incorporated into the HMR.
Analysis of the Alternatives
(1) Incorporate All Special Permits
There are no significant
environmental impacts associated with
the proposals in this NPRM. We are
proposing clarifications and changes to
certain HMR requirements to include
methods for packaging, describing, and
transporting hazardous materials that
are currently permitted under widely
used special permits with established
safety records for inclusion in the HMR.
The process through which safety
permits are issued requires the
applicant to demonstrate that the
alternative transportation method or
packaging proposed provides an
equivalent level of safety as that
provided in the HMR. Implicit in this
process is that the special permit must
provide an equivalent level of
environmental protection as that
provided in the HMR. Thus,
incorporation of the special permits as
regulations of general applicability
maintain the existing environmental
protections built into the HMR.
(2) Incorporation of a Subset of Special
Permits
Same as alternative 1.
(3) No Action
If no action is taken then Special
Permits will continue to be issued
resulting in no change to the current
potential affects to the environment.
Comments From Agencies and Public
PHMSA solicits comments about
potential environmental impacts
associated with this rulemaking from
other agencies, stakeholders, and
citizens.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70, pages 19477–78), or at
https://www.regulations.gov.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
K. Executive Order 13609 and
International Trade Analysis
Under E.O. 13609, agencies must
consider whether the impacts associated
with significant variations between
domestic and international regulatory
approaches are unnecessary or may
impair the ability of American business
to export and compete internationally.
In meeting shared challenges involving
health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues,
international regulatory cooperation can
identify approaches that are at least as
protective as those that are or would be
adopted in the absence of such
cooperation. International regulatory
cooperation can also reduce, eliminate,
or prevent unnecessary differences in
regulatory requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979 (Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 103–465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. For purposes of these
requirements, Federal agencies may
participate in the establishment of
international standards, so long as the
standards have a legitimate domestic
objective, such as providing for safety,
and do not operate to exclude imports
that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international
standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
PHMSA participates in the
establishment of international standards
in order to protect the safety of the
American public, and we have assessed
the effects of the proposed rule to
ensure that it does not cause
unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade.
Accordingly, this rulemaking is
consistent with E.O. 13609 and
PHMSA’s obligations.
List of Subjects
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 172
Education, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Incorporation by reference, Labeling,
Markings, Packaging and containers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation,
Packaging and containers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Uranium.
49 CFR Part 175
Hazardous materials transportation,
Air carriers, Incorporation by reference,
Radioactive materials, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 178
Hazardous materials transportation,
Incorporation by reference, Motor
vehicle safety, Packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
are proposing to amend 49 CFR chapter
I as follows:
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
PART 107—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PROGRAM PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 107
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701;
Pub. L. 101–410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note); Pub. L. 104–121 sections 212–213;
Pub. L. 104–134 section 31001; 49 CFR 1.45,
1.53.
2. In § 107.709, paragraph (g) is added
to read as follows:
49 CFR Part 107
PO 00000
64457
Sfmt 4702
§ 107.709 Processing of an application for
approval, including an application for
renewal or modification.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) If, at least 60 days before an
existing approval expires the holder
files an application for renewal that is
complete and conforms to the
requirements of this section, the
approval will not expire until final
administrative action on the application
for renewal has been taken.
PART 172—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
TABLE, SPECIAL PROVISIONS,
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
COMMUNICATIONS, EMERGENCY
RESPONSE INFORMATION, TRAINING
REQUIREMENTS, AND SECURITY
PLANS
3. The authority citation for part 172
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 44701; 49
CFR 1.53.
4. In § 172.101, in the Hazardous
Materials Table, the following entries
are revised:
§ 172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous
materials table.
*
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
*
*
22OCP1
*
*
Hazardous
materials
descriptions and
proper
shipping
names
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Identification Nos.
(4)
(1)
Hazard class or division
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Life-saving
appliances,
self inflating.
*
9 .....................................
*
9 ......................................
UN2990
UN3077
Ammonia
8 ......................................
solutions,
relative
density
between
0.880
and
0.957 at
15 degrees C
in water,
with
more
than 10
percent
but not
more
than 35
percent
ammonia.
Environmentally
hazardous
substances,
solid,
n.o.s..
UN2672
(3) ...................................
(2) .............
Symbols
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
*
...................
*
III ..............
III ..............
(5) .............
PG
*
None .........
*
9 ...............
8 ...............
(6) .............
Label
Codes
*
338 ..................................
*
8, 146, A11, B54, IB8,
IP3, N20, T1, TP33,
N91.
336, IB3, IP8, T7, TP1 ...
(7) ...................................
Special
provisions
(§ 172.102)
*
None .........
*
155 ...........
154 ...........
(8A) ...........
Exception
219 ...........
213 ...........
203 ...........
(8B) ...........
Non-bulk
(8)
Packaging
(§ 173.***)
§ 172.101 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TABLE
*
None .........
*
240 ...........
241 ...........
(8C) ..........
Bulk
*
No limit .....
*
No Limit ....
5L .............
(9A) ...........
Passenger
aircraft/rail
No limit .....
No Limit ....
60L ...........
(9B) ...........
Cargo aircraft only
(9)
Quantity limitations (see
§§ 173.27 and 175.75)
A ...............
A ...............
A ...............
(10A) .........
Location
40, 52, 85
(10B)
Other
(10)
Vessel stowage
64458
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Self-heating solid,
organic,
n.o.s..
Regulated
medical
waste,
n.o.s. or
Clinical
waste,
unspecified,
n.o.s. or
(BIO)
Medical
waste,
n.o.s., or
Biomedical
waste,
n.o.s. or
Medical
waste,
n.o.s..
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Frm 00025
*
*
4.2 ...................................
*
6.2 ..................................
UN3088
UN3291
*
*
III ..............
*
II ...............
*
*
4.2 ............
*
6.2 ............
*
*
IB6, IP2, B116, N91, T3,
TP33.
*
41, A13, 337 ...................
*
*
None .........
*
134 ...........
212 ...........
197 ...........
*
*
241 ...........
*
197 ...........
*
*
15kg ..........
*
No limit .....
50kg ..........
No limit .....
C ...............
B ...............
40
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
64459
64460
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 172.102:
a. In paragraph (c)(1), special
provisions 336, 337, and 338 are added;
b. In paragraph (c)(3), special
provision B116 is added; and
c. In paragraph (c)(5), special
provision N91 is added.
The additions read as follows:
§ 172.102
*
Special provisions.
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
Code/Special Provisions
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
*
*
*
*
*
336 The use of UN1H1 drums,
UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packagings which meet the
requirements of Part 178 of the HMR at
the Packing Group I or II performance
level except that the packagings are not
required to meet the venting
requirements in § 173.24(g) and the
hydrostatic pressure test marking
specified in § 173.24a(b)(4) is required.
Shipment of packages under this special
provision must be made by private or
contract motor carrier. Transportation of
these packages also requires the door of
each van trailer to be marked with
‘‘Warning trailer may contain chemical
vapor. Do not enter until vapors have
dissipated.’’ The driver of the transport
vehicle and the consignee(s) must be
trained not to enter the transport vehicle
until the ammonia vapors have
dissipated, and the emergency response
paper must indicate that the vehicle
contains ammonia vapors. Transport
vehicles must be vented to prevent
accumulation of vapors at a poisonous
or flammable concentration.
337 Authorizes the use of regulated
waste containers marked with the
alternative shipping name of Regulated
medical waste, UN3291 and orientation
arrows that deviate from the prescribed
specifications in § 172.312(a)(2).
338 Life Saving appliances, self
inflating, transported between a U.S.
Coast Guard approved inflatable life raft
servicing facility and a vessel are only
subject to the following requirements:
a. Prior to repacking into the lifesaving appliance, an installed inflation
cylinder must successfully meet and
pass all inspection and test criteria and
standards of the raft manufacturer and
the vessel Flag State requirements for
cylinders installed as part of life-saving
appliances, self inflation (UN2990) used
on marine vessels. Additionally each
cylinder must be visually inspected in
accordance with CGA pamphlet, CGA
C–6. A current copy of CGA pamphlet,
CGA C–6 must be available at the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
facility servicing the life-saving
appliance.
b. An installed inflation cylinder that
requires recharging must be filled in
accordance with § 173.301(l).
c. Every installed inflation cylinder,
as associated equipment of the lifesaving appliance, must be packed
within the protective packaging of the
life raft and the life raft itself must
otherwise be in compliance with
§ 173.219.
d. The serial number for each cylinder
must be recorded as part of the lifesaving appliance service record by the
U.S. Coast Guard-approved servicing
facility.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
B116 The use of non specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type vehicles,
and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins,
which must be covered by a tarpaulin,
metal cover, or equivalent means is
authorized for the transportation of
spent bleaching earth by motor vehicle.
The material is also subject to
operational controls which include not
exceeding a temperature of 55 °C (130
°F) at the time it is offered or during
transportation, not exceeding a
transportation time of 24 hours, and
drivers transporting spent bleaching
earth must be trained in the properties
and hazards of the spent bleaching
earth.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
N91 The use of a non specification
sift-proof, non-bulk, metal can with or
without lid, or a non specification siftproof, non-bulk fiber drum, with or
without lid is authorized when
transporting coal tar pitch compounds
by motor vehicle or rail freight. The
fiber drum must to be fabricated with a
three ply wall, as a minimum. The coal
tar pitch compound must be in a solid
mass during transportation.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) For non-glass inner packagings the
volume cannot exceed 1 gallon in
capacity;
(ii) For glass inner packagings the
volume cannot exceed 16 ounces in
capacity;
(iii) The net liquid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 192 fluid
ounces. The net solid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 32 pounds.
The gross weight of any single outer
package shipped may not exceed 65
pounds; and
(iv) Packages must be marked with the
company name and the words
‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol’’;
(2) Consumer products containing
more than 70% ethyl alcohol are
excepted from the HMR provided that:
(i) For inner packagings the volume
cannot exceed 8 fluid ounces in
capacity;
(ii) Solids are not packed in inner
packagings exceeding 1⁄2 pound in
weight;
(iii) The net liquid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 192 fluid
ounces. The net solid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 32 pounds.
The gross weight of any single outer
package shipped may not exceed 65
pounds; and
(iv) Packages must be marked with the
company name and the words
‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol’’;
(3) For transportation by passenger or
cargo aircraft, no outer package may be
transported which contains an inner
packaging exceeding:
(i) 16 fluid ounces of flammable
liquid, or
(ii) 1 pound of solids containing
flammable liquid.
PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS
AND PACKAGINGS
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53.
6. The authority citation for part 173
continues to read as follows:
§ 175.34 Exceptions for cylinders of
compressed oxygen or other oxidizing
gases transported within the State of
Alaska.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
7. In § 173.151, paragraph (g) is added
to read as follows.
§ 173.150 Exceptions for Class 3
(flammable and combustible liquids).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Limited quantities of ethyl alcohol.
(1) Consumer products containing not
more than 70% ethyl alcohol are
excepted from the HMR provided that:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 175—CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT
8. The authority citation for part 175
continues to read as follows:
9. Add § 175.34 to read as follows:
(a) When transported in the State of
Alaska, cylinders of compressed oxygen
or other oxidizing gases aboard aircraft
are excepted from all the requirements
of § 173.302(f)(3) through (5) and
§ 173.304(f)(3) through (5) of this
subchapter subject to the following
conditions:
(1) Transportation of the cylinders by
a ground-based or water-based mode of
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 204 / Monday, October 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
transportation is unavailable and
transportation by aircraft is the only
practical means for transporting the
cylinders to their destination;
(2) Each cylinder is fully covered with
a fire or flame resistant blanket that is
secured in place; and
(3) The operator of the aircraft
complies with the applicable
notification procedures under § 175.33.
(b) Aircraft restrictions: This
exception only applies to the following
types of aircraft:
(1) Cargo-only aircraft transporting the
cylinders to a delivery destination that
receives cargo-only service at least once
a week.
(2) Passenger and cargo-only aircraft
transporting the cylinders to a delivery
destination that does not receive cargo
only service once a week.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Oct 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
PART 178—SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PACKAGINGS
10. The authority citation for part 178
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
11. In § 178.516, add paragraph (b)(7)
to read as follows:
§ 178.516
Standards for fiberboard boxes.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(7) Authorization to manufacture,
mark, and sell UN4G combination
packagings with outer fiberboard boxes
and with inner fiberboard components
that have individual containerboard or
paper wall basis weights that vary by
not more than plus or minus 5% from
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
64461
the nominal basis weight reported in the
initial design qualification test report.
12. In § 178.521, add paragraph (b)(4)
to read as follows:
§ 178.521
Standards for paper bags.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) UN5M1 and UN5M2 multi wall
paper bags that have paper wall basis
weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the nominal basis
weight reported in the initial design
qualification test report.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–25853 Filed 10–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 204 (Monday, October 22, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64450-64461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25853]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 107, 172, 173, 175, and 178
[Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0158 (HM-233C)]
RIN 2137-AE82
Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Certain Special Permits and
Competent Authorities Into Regulations
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely used or longstanding special
permits and certain competent authority approvals (``approvals'') that
have established safety records. Special permits allow a company or
individual to package or ship a hazardous material in a manner that
varies from the regulations provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. An approval is a written consent (document) required under
an international standard (i.e., International Maritime Dangerous Goods
(IMDG) Code, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)), or is
specifically provided for in the HMR, and is issued by the Associate
Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety. These proposed revisions
are intended to provide wider access to the regulatory flexibility
offered in special permits and approvals and eliminate the need for
numerous renewal requests, reducing paperwork burdens and facilitating
commerce while maintaining an appropriate level of safety.
Additionally, this rulemaking will address three petitions for
rulemaking regarding the continued use of renewal applications for long
standing special permits.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before December 21,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by identification of the docket
number (PHMSA-2011-0158; HM-233C) by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Routing
Symbol M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice at the beginning of the comment. All
comments received will be posted without change to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS), including any personal information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or DOT's Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any
written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70;
Pages 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Andrews, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Standards and Rulemaking Division, (202) 366-8553,
or, Diane LaValle, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Approvals and
Permits Division, (202) 366-4535, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Overview of Proposed Amendments
IV. Summary Review of Amendments
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Executive Summary
PHMSA is proposing to amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations
(HMR; 49 CFR parts 171-180) to incorporate several long standing
special permit and competent authorities into the HMR. The identified
special permits and competent authorities have a long history of
safety. Special permits allow a company or individual to package or
ship a hazardous material in a manner that varies from the hazardous
materials regulations (HMR) provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. A competent authority (CA) approval is a written consent
(document) required under an international standard (i.e.,
International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) code or International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)) and is issued by the Associate
Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
In 2009, an audit of the Special Permits program by the Office of
the Inspector General identified a need for an ongoing review of all
open special permits with an outlook towards identifying those that
should be made part of the HMR to reduce the overall economic burden to
both affected industry and the government. Four rulemakings, HM-233A
(75 FR 27205), HM-245 (76 FR 5483), and HM-216B (77 FR 37962) have
successfully codified certain special permits into the HMR. These
revisions provided wider access to the regulatory flexibility offered
in special permits and eliminate the need for numerous renewal
requests, thus reducing paperwork burdens and facilitating commerce
while maintaining an appropriate level of safety.
This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), HM-233C, continues this
[[Page 64451]]
initiative by proposing to incorporate several additional long-standing
special permits and competent authority approvals with proven safety
records into the HMR. The special permits affected by the proposed rule
represent variances from current regulations on topics categorized as
follows:
Limited quantities of liquids and solids containing ethyl
alcohol.
Transportation of solid coal tar pitch compounds.
Transportation of certain ammonia solutions in UN1H1 and
UN6HA1 drums.
Transportation of spent bleaching earth.
Requalification of non-DOT specification cylinders in
life-saving appliances.
Use of regulated medical waste containers displaying
alternative markings.
Incorporation of Oxygen Generator special permits to
harmonize with FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.
The economic impact of the proposed rule can thus be summarized as
follows: NET Cost: $0. Currently, industry must apply for a special
permit in order to ship materials as described in this NPRM.
Incorporation of these special permits into the HMR will reduce the
burden on industry by no longer requiring industry to apply for a
special permit to ship these materials. Therefore, this proposed rule
does not impose any new costs to industry.
NET Benefits: $4,539 per year. (Averaged over 10 years, at a 7%
annual discount rate.)
In addition to general positive economic impacts noted above, there
are known benefits by the elimination of the need for numerous party-to
applications and renewal requests. PHMSA estimates that the
incorporation of these special permits and competent authority
approvals will result in 140 fewer responses per year.
II. Background
PHMSA is proposing to amend the HMR to incorporate certain
requirements based on existing special permits (SPs) issued by PHMSA
under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart B (Sec. Sec. 107.101 to 107.127) and
certain approvals issued under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart D (Sec. Sec.
107.401 to 107.405). A special permit sets forth alternative
requirements--or a variance--to the requirements in the HMR in a way
that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety level
required under the regulations or that is consistent with the public
interest. See 49 CFR 107.105(d). Congress expressly authorized DOT to
issue these variances in the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (US
Code: 49 USC 5109-5127) as amended. An approval is a written consent
(document) required under an international standard (i.e., IMDG Code,
ICAO), or is authorized in a specific section of the HMR and is issued
by the Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
Special Permits
The HMR generally are performance-oriented regulations, which
provide the regulated community with some flexibility in meeting safety
requirements. Even so, not every transportation situation can be
anticipated and built into the regulations. Innovation is the strength
of our economy and the hazardous materials community is a leader in
developing new materials and technologies and innovative ways of moving
materials. Special permits enable the hazardous materials industry to
quickly, effectively, and safely integrate new products and
technologies into production and the transportation stream. Thus,
special permits provide a mechanism for testing new technologies,
promoting increased transportation efficiency and productivity, and
ensuring global competitiveness. Hazardous materials transported under
the terms of a special permit must achieve a level of safety at least
equal to the level of safety achieved when transported under the HMR or
that is consistent with the public interest. Implementation of new
technologies and operational techniques may enhance safety. Special
permits also reduce the volume and complexity of the HMR by addressing
unique or infrequent transportation situations that would be difficult
to accommodate in regulations intended for use by a wide range of
shippers and carriers.
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of special permits to identify
widely used and longstanding special permits with established safety
records for conversion into regulations of broader applicability.
Converting these special permits into regulations reduces paperwork
burdens and facilitates commerce while maintaining an acceptable level
of safety. Additionally, adoption of special permits as rules of
general applicability provides wider access to the benefits and
regulatory flexibility of the provisions granted in the special
permits. Factors that influence whether or not a specific special
permit is a candidate for regulatory action include: the safety record
for hazardous materials transported or operations conducted under a
special permit; potential broad application of a special permit;
suitability of provisions in the special permit for incorporation into
the HMR; rulemaking activity in related areas; and agency priorities.
The special permits addressed in this NPRM have hundreds of party
status holders. Party status is granted to a person who intends to
offer for transportation or transport a hazardous material or perform
an activity subject to the HMR in the same manner as the original
applicant.
The proposed amendments will eliminate the need for approximately
464 current holders to reapply for renewal of 20 special permits. This
will also reduce the burden on PHMSA to process renewal applications.
These proposals will also apply to any special permits this agency
issues during the development of this rulemaking whose provisions are
identical in every respect to those described in the rulemakings issued
under this docket. To emphasize this, we preface the description of the
affected special permits with the wording ``include'' or ``includes''
to clarify that additional special permits issued after the publication
of this NPRM that are identical in every aspect as those specifically
listed in this NPRM may be incorporated under these amendments.
Incorporation of the special permits into the HMR eliminates
significant paperwork burdens. As a condition of a special permit
issued by PHMSA and depending on the provisions of the special permit,
a copy of each special permit must be: (1) Maintained at each facility
where an operation is conducted or a packaging is manufactured under a
special permit; (2) maintained at each facility where a package is
offered or re-offered for transportation under a special permit; and
(3) in some cases, carried aboard each transport vehicle used to
transport a hazardous material under a special permit.
Competent Authority Approvals
The HMR also allows for PHMSA to grant approvals to companies or
organizations for the manufacturing of packages in accordance with the
HMR. PHMSA has identified approvals that have an established safety
record to incorporate into the HMR. The approvals PHMSA identified for
conversion into the HMR have an established safety record and warrant
incorporation into regulations of broader applicability. Converting
these approvals into regulations reduces paperwork burdens and
facilitates commerce while maintaining an acceptable level of safety. A
copy of each approval must be maintained at each facility where a
packaging is
[[Page 64452]]
manufactured under this approval. The incorporation of component
authority approval eliminates the renewal and maintenance requirements
that were previously required. Additionally, adoption of approvals as
rules of general applicability provides wider access to the benefits
and regulatory flexibility of the provisions granted in the approvals.
Factors that influence whether a specific approval is a candidate for
regulatory action include: the safety record, whether broadly
applicable, related rulemakings, and agency priorities.
III. Overview of Proposed Amendments
In this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to revise the HMR by providing:
Special Permits
DOT-SP 9275--Authorization for the transportation in
commerce of certain limited quantities of liquids and solids containing
ethyl alcohol and exempt these shipments from the provisions of the
HMR.
DOT-SP 11263--Authorization for the transportation of
Class 9 solid coal pitch compounds in non-specification open-top or
closed-top sift proof metal cans or fiber drums.
DOT-SP 11836--Authorization for the transportation in
commerce of UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums containing ammonia solutions that do
not meet certain requirements contained in Sec. Sec. 173.24 and
173.24a.
DOT-SP 13124--Authorizations for the transportation of
ammonia solutions in UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums by private or contract
carrier.
DOT-SP 12134--Authorization of exceptions for spent
bleaching earth (Division 4.2 PG III).
DOT-SP 12825--Authorization for the transportation of
Life-saving appliances, self inflating, that contain non-specification
steel cylinders between a vessel and an authorized facility for
servicing.
DOT-SP 14479--Authorization for the use of alternative
shipping names and marking requirements for regulated medical wastes.
Special Permits for Harmonization with the ``FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012''--PHMSA is adding an exception to
the HMR for Oxygen cylinders and other Oxidizing cylinders transported
aboard aircraft within the state of Alaska. This language will make
several existing special permits no longer necessary. This includes the
following special permits: 14903, 14908, 15062, 15075, 15076, 15077,
15078, 15079, 15092, 15094, 15095, and 15143.
Approvals
CA2005120010--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis weights that vary by not more
than plus or minus 5% from the measured basis weight in the initial
design qualification test report.
CA20060660005--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and
sell UN5M1 and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with individual paper wall
basis weights that vary by plus or minus 5% from the nominal basis
weights reported in the initial design qualification test report.
CA2006060006--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights that vary by plus or minus 5%
from the nominal basis weight reported in the initial design.
CA2006010012--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have individual containerboard basis weight
that vary by plus or minus 5% from the nominal basis weight reported in
the initial design qualification test report.
Revision to Approvals Renewals
PHMSA is proposing to revise this section to allow for
approval holders applying for a timely renewal to continue using their
approval after the expiration date if they apply within 60 days of the
expiration dates.
IV. Summary Review of Amendments
A. Limited Quantities of Liquids and Solids Containing Ethyl Alcohol
DOT-SP 9275 authorized the transportation in commerce of certain
limited quantities of liquids and solids containing ethyl alcohol and
exempts these shipments from the provisions of HMR. This special permit
has been in effect since at least 1985 and had been utilized by
hundreds of companies. However, on August 18, 2011 PHMSA found that SP
9275 did not provide a level of safety at least equivalent to the HMR
due to the lack of hazard communications markings. PHMSA issued a
revised version of SP 9275 to address the lack of hazard communication
markings on August 18, 2011.
This rulemaking also will address two petitions for rulemaking
related to SP 9275. A petition from the Association of Hazmat Shippers
(AHS) (P-1574) requests PHMSA to incorporate the provisions of SP 9275.
A petition for rulemaking was also received from the Council on Safe
Transportation of Hazardous Articles (COSTHA) (P-1585) to incorporate
SP 9275. COSTHA and the AHS noted that SP 9275 has been in existence
for 30 years with little evidence of incidents involving the packaging,
shipment, or operations conducted under the SP. Both of these petitions
were supportive of incorporating the provisions of SP 9275 into the
HMR.
Therefore, PHMSA is proposing to incorporate the terms of SP 9275
as revised on August 18, 2011. PHMSA is proposing to allow certain
limited quantities of ethyl alcohol to be exempted from the applicable
provisions of the HMR provided that the outer packagings are marked
with hazard communication information identifying the company name and
the words ``Contains Ethyl Alcohol.'' PHMSA is proposing to add Sec.
173.151(g) to allow for the shipment of limited quantities of ethyl
alcohol provided they meet the prescribed conditions.
B. Transportation of Solid Coal Tar Pitch Compounds
DOT-SP 11263 authorizes the transportation of solid coal tar pitch
compounds, Class 9, in open-top and closed-top sift-proof metal cans or
fiber drums. The special permit has been in effect since 1994 and has
been utilized by 5 holders with an acceptable safety performance. In
addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents over the past 10 years
involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of DOT-SP 11263 into the
HMR by amending the entry in Sec. 172.101, The Hazardous Materials
Table (HMT), for Environmentally hazardous substances, solids, n.o.s.,
UN 3077, by adding a new Special Provision N91 in Column 7. In
addition, in Sec. 172.102 new Special Provision N91 would be added in
appropriate sequence specifically authorizing the use of a non-DOT
specification sift-proof, non-bulk, metal can with or without lid, or a
non-DOT specification sift-proof, non-bulk fiber drum, with or without
lid. The fiber drum would be required to be fabricated with a three ply
wall, as a minimum. The coal tar pitch compound must remain in a solid
mass during transportation.
C. Transportation of Certain Ammonia Solutions in UN1H1 Drums, UN3H1
Jerricans, and UN6HA1 Composite Packagings
DOT-SP 11836 authorizes the transportation of specific ammonia
solutions in specification UN1H1
[[Page 64453]]
drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1 composite packagings that do not
meet the provisions in Sec. Sec. 173.24 and 173.24a. Specific
operational controls are required in lieu of compliance with these two
requirements. This special permit has been in effect since 1997 and has
been utilized by at least 61 holders with an acceptable safety
performance. In addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents over the past
10 years involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of DOT-SP 11836 into the
HMR by amending the entry in the HMT for Ammonia solutions, relative
density between 0.880 and 0.957 at 15 degrees C in water, with more
than 10 percent but not more than 35 percent ammonia, UN 2672, by
adding a new Special Provision 336 in Column 7. In addition, in Sec.
172.102 new Special Provision 336 would be added in appropriate
sequence specifically authorizing the use of DOT UN1H1drums, UN3H1
jerricans, and UN6HA1 composite packagings which meet the requirements
of Part 178 of the HMR at the Packing Group I or II performance level
except that the packagings do not meet the venting requirements in
Sec. 173.24(g) and the hydrostatic pressure test marking specified in
Sec. 173.24a(b)(4). Transportation of these packages would also
require the door of each van trailer to be marked with ``Warning
trailer may contain chemical vapor. Do not enter until vapors have
dissipated.'' The driver of the transport vehicle and the consignee(s)
must be trained not to enter the transport vehicle until the ammonia
vapors have dissipated, and the emergency response paper must indicate
that the vehicle may contain ammonia vapors.
D. Transportation of Spent Bleaching Earth
DOT-SP 12134 authorizes the transportation of spent bleaching earth
as a Division 4.2, solid, PG III, exempt from the provisions of the
HMR, except as specifically required by the special permit. Packagings
authorized under the special permit are non-specification, sift-proof
dump or hopper type vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk
bins. All authorized packaging must be covered by a tarpaulin, metal
cover, or equivalent means during transportation. The special permit
also includes specific operational controls, including: The temperature
of the spent bleaching earth may not exceed 55 [deg]C at the time it is
offered for transportation and any time during transportation; drivers
must be specifically trained in handling and responding to emergency
incidents involving the spent bleaching earth; and transport vehicles
must be marked in accordance with Sec. 172.302(a). This special permit
has been in effect since 1999 and has been utilized by at least 27
holders with an acceptable safety performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents over the past 10 years involving this special
permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of DOT-SP 12134 into the
HMR by amending the entry in the HMT for self-heating solid, organic,
n.o.s. (spent bleaching earth), UN 3088, by adding a new Special
Provision, B116 in Column 7. In addition, in Sec. 172.102 new Special
Provision B116 would be added in appropriate sequence specifically
authorizing the use of non specification, sift-proof dump or hopper
type motor vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins, which
must be covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent means. The
material would also be subject to operational controls including not
exceeding a temperature of 55 [deg]C (130[emsp14][deg]F) during
transportation, not exceeding a transportation time of 24 hours, and
drivers transporting spent bleaching earth must be trained in the
properties and hazards of the spent bleaching earth and the actions
required to mitigate the self-heating properties of the material that
may occur during the transportation.
E. Requalification of Non-DOT Specification Cylinders in Life-Saving
Appliances
DOT-SP 12825 authorizes the transportation of life-saving
appliances, self inflating, that contain non-DOT specification steel
cylinders for the purpose of movement between a vessel and a U.S. Coast
Guard approved inflatable life raft servicing facility in conjunction
with the servicing of such life-saving appliances. Specific operational
controls are specified. This special permit has been in effect since
2001 and has been utilized by at least 54 holders with acceptable
safety performance. In addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents since
2001 involving this special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of DOT-SP 12825 into the
HMR by revising the entry in the HMT for Life-saving appliances, self
inflating, UN 2990, by adding a new Special Provision 338 in Column 7.
In addition, in Sec. 172.102, new Special Provision 338 would be added
in appropriate sequence requiring that Life-saving appliances, self
inflating, UN 2990 being shipped between a vessel and a U.S. Coast
Guard approved life raft servicing facility only be subject to the
requirements of this special provision. A material meeting the
requirements of the special provision would not otherwise be subject to
the HMR.
F. Use of Regulated Medical Waste Containers Displaying Alternative
Markings
DOT-SP 14479 authorizes the continued use of regulated medical
waste containers manufactured before October 1, 2006 and marked with an
alternative shipping name for UN 3291 and orientation arrows that
deviate from prescribed specifications. This special permit has been in
effect since 2007 and has been utilized by at least 22 holders. In
addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents since 2007 involving this
special permit.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of DOT-SP 14479 into the
HMR by amending the entry in the HMT for Regulated Medical Waste,
n.o.s., UN 3088, by adding a new Special Provision, 337 in Column 7.
Special Provision 337 would allow for the use of regulated waste
containers marked with the alternative shipping name of Regulated
medical waste, UN 3291 and orientation arrows that deviate from the
prescribed specifications in Sec. 172.312(a)(2).
G. Incorporation of Oxygen Generator Special Permits To Harmonize With
FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
Section 824 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
includes a provision that allows for exceptions for cylinders of
compressed oxygen or other oxidizing gases transported in the State of
Alaska aboard aircraft. By incorporating this statutory exception into
the HMR, PHMSA believes that following special permits will no longer
be necessary: 14903, 14908, 15062, 15075, 15076, 15077, 15078, 15079,
15092, 15094, 15095, and 15143. These special permits all provided
exceptions for the transportation of Oxygen and other Division 2.2
Oxidizing gases for transportation aboard aircraft in the state of
Alaska. PHSMA proposes to incorporate the terms of these special
permits in Sec. 175.34.
H. Competent Authority CA2005120010 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This approval authorizes the manufacturing, marking, and selling of
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis weights that vary by not more
than plus or minus 5% from the measured basis weight in the initial
design qualification test report. This approval was issued in 2009 and
has demonstrated an
[[Page 64454]]
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA has no reported incidents
involving this approval. PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of
CA2005120010 into the HMR in Sec. 178.516(b)(7).
I. Competent Authority CA2006060005 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This approval authorizes the manufacture, mark, and sale of UN5M1
and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with individual paper wall basis
weights that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the nominal
basis weights reported in the initial design qualification test report.
This approval was issued in 2009 and has demonstrated an acceptable
safety performance. PHMSA has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of CA2006060005 in
Sec. 178.521(b)(4).
J. Competent Authority CA2006060006 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This approval authorizes the manufacture, mark, and sale of UN4G
combination packagings with outer fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the nominal basis weight reported in the initial
design. This approval was issued in 2009 and has demonstrated an
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA has no reported incidents
involving this approval. PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of
CA2006060006 in Sec. 178.516(b)(7).
K. Competent Authority CA2006010012 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This competent authority authorizes the manufacture, mark, and sale
of UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with
inner fiberboard components that have individual containerboard basis
weight that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the nominal
basis weight reported in the initial design qualification test report.
This approval was issued in 2006 and has demonstrated an acceptable
safety performance. PHMSA has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of CA2006010012 in
Sec. 178.516(b)(7).
L. Revision of Sec. 107.709 for Renewing Approvals
PHMSA is proposing to revise this section to allow approval holders
applying for a renewal to continue using their approval after the
expiration date if they apply at least 60 days before the expiration
date. PHMSA received a petition (P-1571) from Lawrence Bierlein that
requested this change. This petition was accepted and HMR language is
being proposed.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This NPRM is published under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b)
which authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations for the safe
transportation, including security, of hazardous material in
intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b), 5104, 5110, or 5112 of the
Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Law to a person
transporting, or causing to be transported, hazardous material in a way
that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety level
required under the law, or consistent with the public interest, if a
required safety level does not exist. The proposed rule would amend the
regulations by incorporating provisions from certain widely used and
longstanding special permits that have established a history of safety
and which may, therefore, be converted into the regulations for general
use.
B. Executive Order 12866, 13563, and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This proposed rule is considered a non-significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) and was reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). The proposed rule is considered a non-significant
rule under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures order issued by the
Department of Transportation [44 FR 11034]. Executive Order 13563 is
supplemental to and reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review that were established in
Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review of September 30,
1993. By building off of each other, these two Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 require agencies to regulate in the ``most cost-effective
manner,'' to make a ``reasoned determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs,'' and to develop regulations
that ``impose the least burden on society.''
In this notice, PHMSA proposes to amend the HMR to incorporate
alternatives this agency has permitted under widely used and
longstanding special permits and approvals with established safety
records that we have determined meet the safety criteria for inclusion
in the HMR. Incorporation of these special permits and approvals into
regulations of general applicability will provide shippers and carriers
with additional flexibility to comply with established safety
requirements, thereby reducing transportation costs and increasing
productivity. In addition, the proposed rule would reduce the paperwork
burden on industry and this agency resulting from putting an end to the
need for renewal applications for special permits. Taken together, the
provisions of this proposed rule would promote the continued safe
transportation of hazardous materials while reducing transportation
costs for the industry and administrative costs for the agency.
The impact of this proposed rule is presumed to be minor as no new
costs will be imposed upon any stakeholders and those that currently
hold special permits and CAs will find some relief from regulatory
review for current practices. This proposed rule would make provisions
that are currently approved in certain special permits available to all
businesses operating in the U.S. without needing to submit party-to
special permit applications to PHMSA, and current permit holders will
no longer need renewals. Over the past decade, approximately 464
companies have applied for and/or renewed the special permits included
in this proposal. Many of these special permits have had positive
economic impacts by allowing companies to be excepted from requirements
in the HMR when shipping certain quantities/types of materials or by
allowing the use of less expensive non-specification packages when
certain provisions are met. It is difficult to quantify the savings
these special permits have allowed, but it should be noted that these
savings would be extended to other firms that would make use of the
provisions once adopted into regulations. PHMSA calculates that this
rulemaking would result in a paperwork reduction that, on average,
saves each applicant $39.50. PHMSA estimates that over a 10-year period
there will be an estimated benefit total totaling $18,328 affecting
approximately 140 entities. In accordance with the Federal hazardous
materials law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), initial issuances of special
permits are for two years and can be renewed for four years thereafter.
Thus, over 10 years, a special permit would on average be renewed twice
for a total benefit of between $43,000 and $47,000. These figures are
discounted annually by 3 and 7 percent to reflect the time value of
money.
This Notice also proposes to incorporate four approvals into the
HMR. This would allow manufacturers
[[Page 64455]]
of affected hazardous materials packaging to continue manufacturing
packages without the need to renew their approvals. Incorporation of
the four approvals would result in a one-time total economic benefit of
$158. The renewal cycle for approvals can vary based on the applicant
needs and regulatory authority, but are typically renewed every five
years. At both 3 and 7 percent annual discount, this yields over $270
in benefits. Total benefits represent a small but positive sum (between
$46,000 and $52,000) over 10 years affecting approximately 140
entities.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism''). This
proposed rule would preempt state, local and Indian tribe requirements
but does not propose any regulation that has substantial direct effects
on the states, the relationship between the national government and the
states, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of governments. Therefore, the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply. Federal hazardous
material transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, contains an express
preemption provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b)) preempting state, local and
Indian tribe requirements on certain covered subjects. Covered subjects
are:
(1) The designation, description, and classification of hazardous
materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling, labeling, marking, and
placarding of hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and use of shipping documents
related to hazardous materials and requirements related to the number,
contents, and placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation of hazardous materials; or
(5) The designing, manufacturing, fabricating, inspecting, marking,
maintaining, reconditioning, repairing, or testing a package, container
or packaging component that is represented, marked, certified, or sold
as qualified for use in transporting hazardous material in commerce.
This proposed rule addresses covered subject items (2), (3), and
(5) and would preempt any State, local, or Indian tribe requirements
not meeting the ``substantively the same'' standard. Federal hazardous
materials transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(2) that if
PHMSA issues a regulation concerning any of the covered subjects, PHMSA
must determine and publish in the Federal Register the effective date
of Federal preemption. The effective date may not be earlier than the
90th day following the date of issuance of the final rule and not later
than two years after the date of issuance. PHMSA proposes the effective
date of federal preemption will be 90 days from publication of the
final rule in this matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13175 (``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). Because this proposed
rule does not have tribal implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Procedures and Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities.
An agency must conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it
determines and certifies that a rule is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
proposed rule incorporates into the HMR certain widely used special
permits. Incorporation of these special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide shippers and carriers with
additional flexibility to comply with established safety requirements,
thereby reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity.
Entities affected by the proposed rule conceivably include all
persons--shippers, carriers, and others--who offer and/or transport in
commerce hazardous materials. The specific focus of the rule is on the
incorporation of special permits into the HMR. In a review of the
companies using the identified special permits, PHMSA identified a
combination of small and large businesses that would be affected
positively by this rulemaking. For example, the proposed rulemaking
excepts certain shipments from the specific documentation requirements
of the HMR; these exceptions will increase shipping options and reduce
shipment costs. Overall, this proposed rule should reduce the
compliance burden on the regulated industries, such as small businesses
that dispose of medical waste, transporters of limited quantities of
ethyl alcohol, and airlines transporting oxygen generators, without
compromising transportation safety and should provide a slight positive
economic benefit (i.e., reduced compliance burden) for those small
entities. Therefore, we certify that this proposed rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. For example, special permit 9275 will no longer require
businesses to apply for a special permit in order to ship common retail
items such as cosmetics that would normally be shipped as a class 3
material.
This proposed rule has been developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking'') and DOT's procedures and policies to promote compliance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that potential impacts of
draft rules on small entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has an approved information collection under OMB Control
Number 2137-0051, ``Rulemaking, Special Permits, and Preemption
Requirements.'' This NPRM may result in a decrease in the annual burden
and costs under this information collection due to proposed changes to
incorporate provisions contained in certain widely used or longstanding
special permits that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations requires that PHMSA provide interested
members of the public and affected agencies an opportunity to comment
on information and recordkeeping requests.
This proposed rule identifies a revised information collection
request that PHMSA will submit to OMB for approval based on the
requirements in this proposed rule. PHMSA has developed burden
estimates to reflect changes in this proposed rule. PHMSA estimates
that the information collection and recordkeeping burden of this
proposed rule is as follows:
OMB Control No. 2137-0051:
Net Decrease in Annual Number of Respondents: 434.
Net Decrease in Annual Responses: 434.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Hours: 434.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Costs: $17,143.
[[Page 64456]]
PHMSA specifically requests comments on the information collection
and recordkeeping burdens associated with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for approval under this proposed rule.
Requests for a copy of this information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn Foster, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards (PHH-11), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001,
Telephone (202) 366-8553.
Address written comments to the Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking. We must receive comments
regarding information collection burdens prior to the close of the
comment period identified in the DATES section of this rulemaking. In
addition, you may submit comments specifically related to the
information collection burden to the PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at fax number (202) 395-6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document may be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either state, local or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4375,
requires that federal agencies analyze proposed actions to determine
whether the action will have a significant impact on the human
environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations
requires federal agencies to conduct an environmental review
considering (1) the need for the proposed action (2) alternatives to
the proposed action (3) probable environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives and (4) the agencies and persons consulted
during the consideration process. 40 CFR 1508.9(b).
The Need for the Proposed Action
This Notice proposes to allow transportation of the following
hazardous materials and packages in ways that vary from certain other
provisions in the HMR: UN 3291 medical waste, non-DOT specification
steel cylinders for use in life-saving appliances, limited quantities
of liquids and solids containing ethyl alcohol, UN3077 coal tar pitch
compounds, UN 3088 spent bleaching earth, UN 2672 ammonia solutions,
and compressed gases with a subsidiary hazard of 5.1. These hazardous
materials are capable of affecting human health and the environment if
a release were to occur. However, incorporation of these special
permits maintains an equivalent level of safety as provided in the
special permits. These special permits have a long history of
transporting the above mentioned hazardous materials safely and without
any effects on the environment. Therefore, we do not anticipate any
significant positive or negative impacts on the environment by
incorporating these special permits into the HMR.
The need for hazardous materials to support essential services
means transportation of highly hazardous materials is unavoidable.
However, these shipments frequently move through densely populated or
environmentally sensitive areas where the consequences of an incident
could be loss of life, serious injury, or significant environmental
damage. The ecosystems that also could be affected by a hazardous
materials release during transportation include atmospheric, aquatic,
terrestrial, and vegetal resources (for example, wildlife habitats).
The adverse environmental impacts associated with releases of most
hazardous materials are short-term impacts that can be greatly reduced
or eliminated through prompt clean-up of the incident scene.
In all modes of transport, the potential for environmental damage
or contamination exists when packages of hazardous materials are
involved in transportation incidents. The special permits and approvals
being proposed for incorporating into the HMR have consistently
demonstrated a long history of safe use. In its review of these special
permits and approval, PHMSA did not identify any incidents that had a
significant effect on the environment.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
The purpose and need of this rulemaking is to incorporate widely
used special permits or those with an established safety record into
the HMR for universal use. More information about benefits of this
final rulemaking action can be found in the preamble (i.e., ``Overview
of Proposed Amendments) to this rulemaking. The alternatives considered
in the analysis include (1) the proposed action, that is, incorporation
of the proposed special permits as amendments to the HMR; (2)
incorporation of some subset of the proposed special permits (i.e.,
only some of the proposed special permits) as amendments to the HMR;
and (3) the ``no action'' alternative, meaning that none of the
proposed special permits would be incorporated into the HMR.
Analysis of the Alternatives
(1) Incorporate All Special Permits
There are no significant environmental impacts associated with the
proposals in this NPRM. We are proposing clarifications and changes to
certain HMR requirements to include methods for packaging, describing,
and transporting hazardous materials that are currently permitted under
widely used special permits with established safety records for
inclusion in the HMR. The process through which safety permits are
issued requires the applicant to demonstrate that the alternative
transportation method or packaging proposed provides an equivalent
level of safety as that provided in the HMR. Implicit in this process
is that the special permit must provide an equivalent level of
environmental protection as that provided in the HMR. Thus,
incorporation of the special permits as regulations of general
applicability maintain the existing environmental protections built
into the HMR.
(2) Incorporation of a Subset of Special Permits
Same as alternative 1.
(3) No Action
If no action is taken then Special Permits will continue to be
issued resulting in no change to the current potential affects to the
environment.
Comments From Agencies and Public
PHMSA solicits comments about potential environmental impacts
associated with this rulemaking from other agencies, stakeholders, and
citizens.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the
[[Page 64457]]
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, pages 19477-78), or at https://www.regulations.gov.
K. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
Under E.O. 13609, agencies must consider whether the impacts
associated with significant variations between domestic and
international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the
ability of American business to export and compete internationally. In
meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation
can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that
are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation.
International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or
prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as
amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging
in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements,
Federal agencies may participate in the establishment of international
standards, so long as the standards have a legitimate domestic
objective, such as providing for safety, and do not operate to exclude
imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the establishment of international standards
in order to protect the safety of the American public, and we have
assessed the effects of the proposed rule to ensure that it does not
cause unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade. Accordingly, this
rulemaking is consistent with E.O. 13609 and PHMSA's obligations.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 107
Administrative practice and procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 172
Education, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Incorporation by reference, Labeling, Markings, Packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation, Packaging and containers,
Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Uranium.
49 CFR Part 175
Hazardous materials transportation, Air carriers, Incorporation by
reference, Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 178
Hazardous materials transportation, Incorporation by reference,
Motor vehicle safety, Packaging and containers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we are proposing to amend 49 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 107--HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 107 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; Pub. L. 101-410 section 4
(28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104-121 sections 212-213; Pub. L.
104-134 section 31001; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
2. In Sec. 107.709, paragraph (g) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 107.709 Processing of an application for approval, including an
application for renewal or modification.
* * * * *
(g) If, at least 60 days before an existing approval expires the
holder files an application for renewal that is complete and conforms
to the requirements of this section, the approval will not expire until
final administrative action on the application for renewal has been
taken.
PART 172--HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TABLE, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS COMMUNICATIONS, EMERGENCY RESPONSE INFORMATION, TRAINING
REQUIREMENTS, AND SECURITY PLANS
3. The authority citation for part 172 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 44701; 49 CFR 1.53.
4. In Sec. 172.101, in the Hazardous Materials Table, the
following entries are revised:
Sec. 172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table.
* * * * *
[[Page 64458]]
Sec. 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazardous (8) Packaging (Sec. 173.***) (9) Quantity limitations (see (10) Vessel stowage
materials Special ------------------------------------------------ Sec. Sec. 173.27 and -----------------------------
Symbols descriptions Hazard class or Identification PG Label Codes provisions (Sec. -------------175.75)------------
and proper division Nos. 172.102) Exception Non-bulk Bulk Passenger Cargo aircraft Location Other
shipping names aircraft/rail only
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) (2)........... (3).............. (4) (5)........... (6)........... (7).............. (8A).......... (8B).......... (8C).......... (9A).......... (9B).......... (10A)........ (10B)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ammonia 8................ UN2672 III........... 8............. 336, IB3, IP8, 154........... 203........... 241........... 5L............ 60L........... A............ 40, 52, 85
solutions, T7, TP1.
relative
density
between 0.880
and 0.957 at
15 degrees C
in water,
with more
than 10
percent but
not more than
35 percent
ammonia.
* * * * * * *
Environmentall 9................ UN3077 III........... 9............. 8, 146, A11, B54, 155........... 213........... 240........... No Limit...... No Limit...... A............ .............
y hazardous IB8, IP3, N20,
substances, T1, TP33, N91.
solid, n.o.s..
* * * * * * *
Life-saving 9................ UN2990 .............. None.......... 338.............. None.......... 219........... None.......... No limit...... No limit...... A............ .............
appliances,
self
inflating.
[[Page 64459]]
* * * * * * *
Regulated 6.2.............. UN3291 II............ 6.2........... 41, A13, 337..... 134........... 197........... 197........... No limit...... No limit...... B............ 40
medical
waste, n.o.s.
or Clinical
waste,
unspecified,
n.o.s. or
(BIO) Medical
waste,
n.o.s., or
Biomedical
waste, n.o.s.
or Medical
waste, n.o.s..
* * * * * * *
Self-heating 4.2.............. UN3088 III........... 4.2........... IB6, IP2, B116, None.......... 212........... 241........... 15kg.......... 50kg.......... C............ .............
solid, N91, T3, TP33.
organic,
n.o.s..
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64460]]
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 172.102:
a. In paragraph (c)(1), special provisions 336, 337, and 338 are
added;
b. In paragraph (c)(3), special provision B116 is added; and
c. In paragraph (c)(5), special provision N91 is added.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 172.102 Special provisions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
Code/Special Provisions
* * * * *
336 The use of UN1H1 drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1 composite
packagings which meet the requirements of Part 178 of the HMR at the
Packing Group I or II performance level except that the packagings are
not required to meet the venting requirements in Sec. 173.24(g) and
the hydrostatic pressure test marking specified in Sec. 173.24a(b)(4)
is required. Shipment of packages under this special provision must be
made by private or contract motor carrier. Transportation of these
packages also requires the door of each van trailer to be marked with
``Warning trailer may contain chemical vapor. Do not enter until vapors
have dissipated.'' The driver of the transport vehicle and the
consignee(s) must be trained not to enter the transport vehicle until
the ammonia vapors have dissipated, and the emergency response paper
must indicate that the vehicle contains ammonia vapors. Transport
vehicles must be vented to prevent accumulation of vapors at a
poisonous or flammable concentration.
337 Authorizes the use of regulated waste containers marked with
the alternative shipping name of Regulated medical waste, UN3291 and
orientation arrows that deviate from the prescribed specifications in
Sec. 172.312(a)(2).
338 Life Saving appliances, self inflating, transported between a
U.S. Coast Guard approved inflatable life raft servicing facility and a
vessel are only subject to the following requirements:
a. Prior to repacking into the life-saving appliance, an installed
inflation cylinder must successfully meet and pass all inspection and
test criteria and standards of the raft manufacturer and the vessel
Flag State requirements for cylinders installed as part of life-saving
appliances, self inflation (UN2990) used on marine vessels.
Additionally each cylinder must be visually inspected in accordance
with CGA pamphlet, CGA C-6. A current copy of CGA pamphlet, CGA C-6
must be available at the facility servicing the life-saving appliance.
b. An installed inflation cylinder that requires recharging must be
filled in accordance with Sec. 173.301(l).
c. Every installed inflation cylinder, as associated equipment of
the life-saving appliance, must be packed within the protective
packaging of the life raft and the life raft itself must otherwise be
in compliance with Sec. 173.219.
d. The serial number for each cylinder must be recorded as part of
the life-saving appliance service record by the U.S. Coast Guard-
approved servicing facility.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
B116 The use of non specification, sift-proof dump or hopper type
vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins, which must be
covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent means is authorized
for the transportation of spent bleaching earth by motor vehicle. The
material is also subject to operational controls which include not
exceeding a temperature of 55 [deg]C (130 [deg]F) at the time it is
offered or during transportation, not exceeding a transportation time
of 24 hours, and drivers transporting spent bleaching earth must be
trained in the properties and hazards of the spent bleaching earth.
* * * * *
(5) * * *
N91 The use of a non specification sift-proof, non-bulk, metal can
with or without lid, or a non specification sift-proof, non-bulk fiber
drum, with or without lid is authorized when transporting coal tar
pitch compounds by motor vehicle or rail freight. The fiber drum must
to be fabricated with a three ply wall, as a minimum. The coal tar
pitch compound must be in a solid mass during transportation.
* * * * *
PART 173--SHIPPERS--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND
PACKAGINGS
6. The authority citation for part 173 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
7. In Sec. 173.151, paragraph (g) is added to read as follows.
Sec. 173.150 Exceptions for Class 3 (flammable and combustible
liquids).
* * * * *
(g) Limited quantities of ethyl alcohol. (1) Consumer products
containing not more than 70% ethyl alcohol are excepted from the HMR
provided that:
(i) For non-glass inner packagings the volume cannot exceed 1
gallon in capacity;
(ii) For glass inner packagings the volume cannot exceed 16 ounces
in capacity;
(iii) The net liquid contents of all inner packagings in any single
outer packaging may not exceed 192 fluid ounces. The net solid contents
of all inner packagings in any single outer packaging may not exceed 32
pounds. The gross weight of any single outer package shipped may not
exceed 65 pounds; and
(iv) Packages must be marked with the company name and the words
``Contains Ethyl Alcohol'';
(2) Consumer products containing more than 70% ethyl alcohol are
excepted from the HMR provided that:
(i) For inner packagings the volume cannot exceed 8 fluid ounces in
capacity;
(ii) Solids are not packed in inner packagings exceeding \1/2\
pound in weight;
(iii) The net liquid contents of all inner packagings in any single
outer packaging may not exceed 192 fluid ounces. The net solid contents
of all inner packagings in any single outer packaging may not exceed 32
pounds. The gross weight of any single outer package shipped may not
exceed 65 pounds; and
(iv) Packages must be marked with the company name and the words
``Contains Ethyl Alcohol'';
(3) For transportation by passenger or cargo aircraft, no outer
package may be transported which contains an inner packaging exceeding:
(i) 16 fluid ounces of flammable liquid, or
(ii) 1 pound of solids containing flammable liquid.
PART 175--CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT
8. The authority citation for part 175 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53.
9. Add Sec. 175.34 to read as follows:
Sec. 175.34 Exceptions for cylinders of compressed oxygen or other
oxidizing gases transported within the State of Alaska.
(a) When transported in the State of Alaska, cylinders of
compressed oxygen or other oxidizing gases aboard aircraft are excepted
from all the requirements of Sec. 173.302(f)(3) through (5) and Sec.
173.304(f)(3) through (5) of this subchapter subject to the following
conditions:
(1) Transportation of the cylinders by a ground-based or water-
based mode of
[[Page 64461]]
transportation is unavailable and transportation by aircraft is the
only practical means for transporting the cylinders to their
destination;
(2) Each cylinder is fully covered with a fire or flame resistant
blanket that is secured in place; and
(3) The operator of the aircraft complies with the applicable
notification procedures under Sec. 175.33.
(b) Aircraft restrictions: This exception only applies to the
following types of aircraft:
(1) Cargo-only aircraft transporting the cylinders to a delivery
destination that receives cargo-only service at least once a week.
(2) Passenger and cargo-only aircraft transporting the cylinders to
a delivery destination that does not receive cargo only service once a
week.
PART 178--SPECIFICATIONS FOR PACKAGINGS
10. The authority citation for part 178 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 49 CFR 1.53.
11. In Sec. 178.516, add paragraph (b)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 178.516 Standards for fiberboard boxes.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(7) Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G combination
packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner fiberboard
components that have individual containerboard or paper wall basis
weights that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the nominal
basis weight reported in the initial design qualification test report.
12. In Sec. 178.521, add paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 178.521 Standards for paper bags.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) UN5M1 and UN5M2 multi wall paper bags that have paper wall
basis weights that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weight reported in the initial design qualification test
report.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-25853 Filed 10-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P