Establishment of the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley Viticultural Area, 64033-64036 [2012-25639]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 202 / Thursday, October 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
isomers, and salts of isomers whenever
the existence of such salts, isomers, and
salts of isomers is possible, into
Schedule I of the Controlled Substances
Act (CSA). The temporary scheduling of
methylone is due to expire on October
20, 2012. This document will extend the
temporary scheduling of methylone to
April 20, 2013, or until rulemaking
proceedings are completed, whichever
occurs first.
DATES: Effective Date: October 18, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan G. Santos, Associate Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 307–7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 21, 2011, the Administrator of
the DEA published a Final Order in the
Federal Register (76 FR 65371)
amending 21 CFR 1308.11(g) to
temporarily place three synthetic
cathinones, namely mephedrone (4methyl-N-methylcathinone), MDPV (3,4methylenedioxypyrovalerone) and
methylone, into Schedule I of the CSA
pursuant to the temporary scheduling
provisions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h). That
Final Order, which became effective on
the date of publication, was based on
findings by the Administrator of the
DEA that the temporary scheduling of
these three synthetic cathinones was
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1). At the time the Final
Order took effect, section 201(h)(2) of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2) (2011))
required that the temporary scheduling
of a substance expire at the end of one
year from the date of issuance of the
order and that during the pendency of
proceedings under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1)
with respect to the substance, the
temporary scheduling of that substance
could be extended for up to six
months.1 Proceedings for the scheduling
of a substance under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)
may be initiated by the Attorney
General (delegated to the Administrator
of the DEA pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100)
on his own motion, at the request of the
Secretary of Health and Human
Services,2 or on the petition of any
interested party.
1 On July 9, 2012, President Obama signed the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144) (FDASIA), which
amended section 201(h)(2) of the CSA to extend the
timeframes applicable to temporary scheduling.
2 Because the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services has delegated to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of the Department of
Health and Human Services the authority to make
domestic drug scheduling recommendations, for
purposes of this Final Order, all subsequent
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Oct 17, 2012
Jkt 229001
The DEA has gathered and reviewed
the available information regarding the
pharmacology, chemistry, trafficking,
actual abuse, pattern of abuse and the
relative potential for abuse for these
three synthetic cathinones. On March
30, 2012, the Administrator of the DEA
submitted a letter to the Assistant
Secretary for Health of the Department
of Health and Human Services,
requesting scientific and medical
evaluations and scheduling
recommendations for these three
synthetic cathinones. In response to this
letter, on August 14, 2012, the Assistant
Secretary provided to DEA a scientific
and medical evaluation and
recommendation that methylone be
placed in Schedule I.3 Proceedings
regarding methylone have been initiated
in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1).
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(2), the Administrator of the DEA
hereby orders that the temporary
scheduling of methylone, including its
salts, isomers, and salts of isomers
whenever the existence of such salts,
isomers, and salts of isomers is possible,
is extended to April 20, 2013, or until
rulemaking proceedings are completed,
whichever occurs first.
In accordance with this Final Order,
the Schedule I requirements for
handling methylone including its salts,
isomers, and salts of isomers whenever
the existence of such salts, isomers, and
salts of isomers is possible, will remain
in effect until April 20, 2013, or until
rulemaking proceedings are completed,
whichever occurs first.
Pursuant to the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Congressional Review Act) (5
U.S.C. 801–808), DEA has submitted a
copy of this Final Order to both Houses
of Congress and to the Comptroller
General.
64033
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
Discharge of Liens; Redemption by
United States
CFR Correction
In Title 26 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 300 to 499, revised as
of April 1, 2012, on page 563, in
§ 301.7425–4, in paragraph (b)(5)
Example 1, at the end of the third
sentence, ‘‘$1,000’’ is corrected to read
‘‘$100,000’’.
[FR Doc. 2012–25795 Filed 10–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2012–0003; T.D. TTB–108;
Ref: Notice No. 128]
RIN 1513–AB85
Establishment of the Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
162,762-acre ‘‘Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley’’ viticultural area in
Douglas, Grant, and Kittitas Counties in
central Washington. The viticultural
area lies entirely within the larger
Columbia Valley viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
SUMMARY:
Dated: October 10, 2012.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Administrator.
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2012–25510 Filed 10–17–12; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G St. NW.,
Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone
202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
references to ‘‘Secretary’’ have been replaced with
‘‘Assistant Secretary.’’
3 Section 1152 of FDASIA controlled mephedrone
and MDPV as Schedule I controlled substances, but
it did not similarly control methylone. Accordingly,
HHS provided a Scientific and Medical Evaluation
and Scheduling Recommendation for methylone,
recommending that methylone be placed in
Schedule I.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Effective Date: November 19,
2012.
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM
18OCR1
64034
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 202 / Thursday, October 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (Revised),
dated January 21, 2003, to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions
and duties in the administration and
enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) allows the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas and lists the
approved American viticultural areas.
areas. Such petitions must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed viticultural area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the
viticultural area name specified in the
petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
viticultural area;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed viticultural area
that affect viticulture, such as climate,
geology, soils, physical features, and
elevation, and that make the proposed
viticultural area distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed viticultural area
boundary;
• A copy of the appropriate United
States Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
viticultural area, with the boundary of
the proposed viticultural area clearly
drawn thereon; and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed viticultural area boundary
based on USGS map markings.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features as described in
part 9 of the regulations and a name and
a delineated boundary as established in
part 9 of the regulations. These
designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to its geographic origin. The
establishment of viticultural areas
allows vintners to describe more
accurately the origin of their wines to
consumers and helps consumers to
identify wines they may purchase.
Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
Petition
TTB received a petition from Joan R.
Davenport, a professor of soil sciences at
Washington State University, and
Cameron Fries of White Heron Cellars,
on behalf of the vintners and grape
growers in the Ancient Lakes region of
central Washington, proposing the
establishment of the ‘‘Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley’’ viticultural area. The
proposed viticultural area contains
162,762 acres, with 1,399 acres
dedicated to 6 commercially-producing
vineyards. The petition states that there
are also six wineries located within the
proposed viticultural area. The petition
includes a map showing that the
vineyards and wineries are dispersed
throughout the proposed viticultural
area.
TTB notes that the proposed Ancient
Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural
area lies completely within the existing
Columbia Valley viticultural area (27
CFR 9.74). The proposed viticultural
area does not overlap with any other
existing or proposed viticultural areas.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations outlines the procedure for
proposing an American viticultural area
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for
petitions for the establishment or
modification of American viticultural
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 128 in the
Federal Register on May 8, 2012 (77 FR
27001), proposing to establish the
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area. In the proposed rule,
TTB summarized the evidence from the
petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the
proposed viticultural area. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Oct 17, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
distinguishing features of the proposed
viticultural area include climate,
topography, and soils. The proposed
rule contained a comparison of the
distinguishing features of the proposed
viticultural area with the surrounding
regions. Notice No. 128 also contained
a comparison of the proposed
viticultural area with the existing
Columbia Valley viticultural area
detailing how the distinguishing
features of the proposed viticultural area
are consistent with, and distinct from,
the established Columbia Valley
viticultural area. For a description of the
evidence relating to the name,
boundary, and distinguishing features of
the proposed viticultural area, see
Notice No. 128.
In Notice No. 128, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. In addition, given the proposed
viticultural area’s location within the
existing Columbia Valley viticultural
area, TTB also solicited comments on
whether the evidence submitted in the
petition regarding the distinguishing
features of the proposed viticultural area
sufficiently differentiates the proposed
viticultural area from the existing
Columbia Valley viticultural area. TTB
also asked for comments on whether the
geographical features of the proposed
viticultural area are so distinguishable
from the surrounding Columbia Valley
viticultural area that the proposed
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area should no longer be
part of the existing viticultural area. The
comment period closed on July 9, 2012.
In response to Notice No. 128, TTB
received a total of three comments
regarding the proposed viticultural area:
One from Cameron Fries, one of the
original petitioners; one from the
executive director of a Washington State
non-profit wine tourism promotion
association; and one from the City
Administrator of Quincy, Washington,
commenting on his own behalf. All
three commenters supported the
establishment of the Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley viticultural area as
proposed in Notice No. 128. TTB
received no comments in opposition of
the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area as proposed. In regards
to the question of whether the Ancient
Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural
area was so distinct that it should be
separated from the existing Columbia
Valley viticultural area, TTB received
no comments.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition
and the comments received in response
E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM
18OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 202 / Thursday, October 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
to Notice No. 128, TTB finds that the
evidence provided by the petitioner
supports the establishment of the
162,762-acre Ancient Lakes of Columbia
Valley viticultural area within the
Columbia Valley viticultural area.
Accordingly, under the authority of the
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
part 4 of the TTB regulations, TTB
establishes the ‘‘Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley’’ viticultural area in
Douglas, Grant, and Kittitas Counties,
Washington, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary
description of the viticultural area in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Maps
The petitioners provided the required
maps, and TTB lists them below in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. With the
establishment of this viticultural area,
its name, ‘‘Ancient Lakes of Columbia
Valley,’’ is recognized as a name of
viticultural significance under 27 CFR
4.39(i)(3), as the text of this regulation
makes clear. Once this regulation
becomes effective, wine bottlers using
‘‘Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley’’ in
a brand name, including a trademark, or
in another label reference as to the
origin of the wine, will have to ensure
that the product is eligible to use the
viticultural area’s name as an
appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Ancient
Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural
area will not affect any existing
viticultural area, and any bottlers using
‘‘Columbia Valley’’ as an appellation of
origin or in a brand name for wines
made from grapes grown within the
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area will not be affected by
the establishment of this new
viticultural area. The establishment of
the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area will allow vintners to
use ‘‘Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley’’
and ‘‘Columbia Valley’’ as appellations
of origin for wines made from grapes
grown within the Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley viticultural area.
For a wine to be eligible to use a
viticultural area name as an appellation
of origin or a term of viticultural
significance in a brand name, at least 85
percent of the wine must be derived
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Oct 17, 2012
Jkt 229001
from grapes grown within the area
represented by that name or term, and
the wine must meet the other conditions
listed in 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine
is not eligible to use the viticultural area
name as an appellation of origin and
that name or other term of viticultural
significance appears in the brand name,
then the label is not in compliance and
the bottler must change the brand name
and obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the viticultural area name
or other term of viticultural significance
appears in another reference on the
label in a misleading manner, the bottler
would have to obtain approval of a new
label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing a viticultural
area name or other term of viticultural
significance that was used as a brand
name on a label approved before July 7,
1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of a viticultural
area name would be the result of a
proprietor’s efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.227 to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 9.227
64035
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is
‘‘Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley’’.
For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
‘‘Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley’’ is
a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 12 United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the Ancient
Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural
area are titled:
(1) West Bar, Washington, 1966;
(2) Rock Island Dam, Washington,
1966;
(3) Appledale, Washington, 1966,
photoinspected 1976;
(4) Monument Hill, Washington—
Grant County, 1966;
(5) Ephrata SW., Washington—Grant
County, 1956;
(6) Winchester, Washington—Grant
County, 1966;
(7) Winchester SW., Washington—
Grant County, 1966, photorevised 1978;
(8) Royal City, Washington—Grant
County, provisional edition 1986
(formerly named Smyrna);
(9) Beverly NE., Washington—Grant
County, 1965;
(10) Vantage, Washington, 1965,
photorevised 1978;
(11) Ginkgo, Washington, 1953,
photorevised 1978; and
(12) Cape Horn SE., Washington,
1966, photoinspected 1975.
(c) Boundary. The Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley viticultural area is
located in Douglas, Grant, and Kittitas
Counties in central Washington. The
boundary of the Ancient Lakes of
Columbia Valley viticultural area is as
described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the West
Bar map where the western shoreline of
the Columbia River in Kittitas County
intersects with the north boundary line
of section 8, T20N/R22E. Proceed east
along the section boundaries for
approximately 4.35 miles, over the
Columbia River and into Douglas
County, to the intersection of the line
with the Grant and Douglas Counties
common boundary line (concurrent
with the R22E and R23E common line)
at the northwest corner of section 12,
T20N/R22E; then
(2) Proceed north along the Grant and
Douglas Counties common boundary
line for approximately 2.25 miles, onto
the Rock Island Dam map, to the
northwest corner of section 31, T21N/
R23E; then
(3) Proceed east in a straight line
along the section boundaries for
approximately 12.1 miles, over the
Appledale and Monument Hills maps,
onto the Ephrata SW map to the
E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM
18OCR1
64036
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 202 / Thursday, October 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
intersection of the line with the R24E
and R25E common line at the northwest
corner of section 36, T21N/R24E; then
(4) Proceed south along the R24E and
R25E common line for approximately
22.5 miles, over the Winchester and
Winchester SW maps, onto the Royal
City map, passing over the West Canal
and into the Frenchman Hills, to the
southwest corner of section 12, T17N/
R24E (concurrent with the intersection
of the R24E and R25E common line and
a single transmission line); then
(5) Proceed west in a straight line
along the section boundaries (marked
for 3 sections by the single transmission
line) for approximately 4 miles, onto the
Beverly NE map, to the southwest
corner of section 9, T17N/R24E; then
(6) Proceed north in a straight line
along the section boundary for
approximately 1 mile to the northwest
corner of section 9, T17N/R24E; then
(7) Proceed west in a straight line
along the section boundaries for
approximately 7.9 miles, onto the
Vantage map, crossing over Interstate
Route 90 and Columbia River, to the
western shoreline of the Columbia
River, at Hole in the Wall in Kittitas
County, section 6, T17N/R23E; and then
(8) Proceed north along the western
shoreline of the meandering Columbia
River for approximately 23.3 miles,
crossing over the Ginkgo and Cape Horn
SE maps, and onto the West Bar map,
returning to the beginning point.
Signed: September 18, 2012.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: September 27, 2012.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2012–25639 Filed 10–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2012–0909]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Long Island, New York Inland
Waterway From East Rockaway Inlet to
Shinnecock Canal, Hempstead, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulation governing
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Oct 17, 2012
Jkt 229001
the operation of the Wantagh State
Parkway Bridge across the Sloop
Channel, mile 15.4, at Jones Beach, New
York. The deviation is necessary to
install bascule girders at the bridge. This
deviation allows the bridge to remain in
the closed position.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
October 8, 2012 through November 16,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2012–
0909 and are available online at
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2012–0909 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ and then
clicking ‘‘Search’’. They are also
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project
Officer, First Coast Guard District,
judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil, telephone
(212) 668–7165. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Wantagh State Parkway Bridge has a
vertical clearance in the closed position
of 20 feet at mean high water and 23 feet
at mean low water. The existing
drawbridge operation regulations are
listed at 33 CFR 117.5.
The New York Department of
Transportation requested a temporary
deviation to facilitate installation and
painting of bascule girders at the bridge.
The waterway has seasonal
recreational vessels and fishing vessels
of various sizes. We contacted the New
York Marine Trades Association and no
objections were received.
We did not receive 30-days advance
notice for this temporary deviation;
however, the Coast Guard is approving
this temporary deviation because this
girder installation and painting must be
performed during mild climate
conditions to facilitate the painting
operations and allow the new bridge
construction to continue on schedule.
Additional notice to the public will be
provided in the Local Notice to
Mariners and via a broadcast notice to
mariners.
Under this temporary deviation the
Wantagh State Parkway Bridge at mile
15.4, across Sloop Channel, shall
operate between October 8, 2012 and
November 16, 2012, as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Monday through Friday the bridge
may remain closed to vessel traffic from
6:30 a.m. through 12 p.m. and from
12:15 p.m. through 5 p.m.
Saturday and Sunday the bridge shall
open on signal between 7:30 a.m. and
8:30 p.m. after at least a thirty minute
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
At all other times the bridge shall
open on signal after at least a thirty
minute advance notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
Vessels that can pass under the bridge
during the closed periods without a
bridge opening may do so at all times.
There are no alternate routes for vessel
traffic.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the bridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: October 5, 2012.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2012–25542 Filed 10–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0372; FRL–9741–8]
Determination of Attainment of the
1-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards in the Sacramento
Metro Nonattainment Area in California
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is determining that the
Sacramento Metro 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area (Sacramento Metro
Area) has attained the revoked National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (1-hour
ozone NAAQS or standard), and to
exclude certain 2008 data caused by
wildfire exceptional events. These air
quality determinations were proposed
in conjunction with a proposed
determination to terminate the State of
California’s obligations regarding 1-hour
ozone section 185 fee program SIP
provisions for the Sacramento Metro
Area. In this notice, EPA is finalizing
only that portion of its notice of
proposed rulemaking that determines
that the Sacramento Metro Area has
attained the 1-hour ozone standard, and
that excludes certain exceedances as
caused by ozone exceptional events.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM
18OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 202 (Thursday, October 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64033-64036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25639]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2012-0003; T.D. TTB-108; Ref: Notice No. 128]
RIN 1513-AB85
Establishment of the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the 162,762-acre ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley'' viticultural area
in Douglas, Grant, and Kittitas Counties in central Washington. The
viticultural area lies entirely within the larger Columbia Valley
viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners
to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: Effective Date: November 19, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G St.
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations
[[Page 64034]]
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt beverages. The
FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among other things,
prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading statements on
labels, and ensure that labels provide the consumer with adequate
information as to the identity and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act pursuant
to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6
U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various authorities through
Treasury Department Order 120-01 (Revised), dated January 21, 2003, to
the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas and lists
the approved American viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features as described in part 9 of
the regulations and a name and a delineated boundary as established in
part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to its
geographic origin. The establishment of viticultural areas allows
vintners to describe more accurately the origin of their wines to
consumers and helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase.
Establishment of a viticultural area is neither an approval nor an
endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for the establishment or
modification of American viticultural areas. Such petitions must
include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed viticultural
area boundary is nationally or locally known by the viticultural area
name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed viticultural area;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
viticultural area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation, and that make the proposed
viticultural area distinctive and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed viticultural area boundary;
A copy of the appropriate United States Geological Survey
(USGS) map(s) showing the location of the proposed viticultural area,
with the boundary of the proposed viticultural area clearly drawn
thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed
viticultural area boundary based on USGS map markings.
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley Petition
TTB received a petition from Joan R. Davenport, a professor of soil
sciences at Washington State University, and Cameron Fries of White
Heron Cellars, on behalf of the vintners and grape growers in the
Ancient Lakes region of central Washington, proposing the establishment
of the ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley'' viticultural area. The
proposed viticultural area contains 162,762 acres, with 1,399 acres
dedicated to 6 commercially-producing vineyards. The petition states
that there are also six wineries located within the proposed
viticultural area. The petition includes a map showing that the
vineyards and wineries are dispersed throughout the proposed
viticultural area.
TTB notes that the proposed Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area lies completely within the existing Columbia Valley
viticultural area (27 CFR 9.74). The proposed viticultural area does
not overlap with any other existing or proposed viticultural areas.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 128 in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012
(77 FR 27001), proposing to establish the Ancient Lakes of Columbia
Valley viticultural area. In the proposed rule, TTB summarized the
evidence from the petition regarding the name, boundary, and
distinguishing features for the proposed viticultural area. The
distinguishing features of the proposed viticultural area include
climate, topography, and soils. The proposed rule contained a
comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed viticultural
area with the surrounding regions. Notice No. 128 also contained a
comparison of the proposed viticultural area with the existing Columbia
Valley viticultural area detailing how the distinguishing features of
the proposed viticultural area are consistent with, and distinct from,
the established Columbia Valley viticultural area. For a description of
the evidence relating to the name, boundary, and distinguishing
features of the proposed viticultural area, see Notice No. 128.
In Notice No. 128, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. In addition, given the proposed viticultural
area's location within the existing Columbia Valley viticultural area,
TTB also solicited comments on whether the evidence submitted in the
petition regarding the distinguishing features of the proposed
viticultural area sufficiently differentiates the proposed viticultural
area from the existing Columbia Valley viticultural area. TTB also
asked for comments on whether the geographical features of the proposed
viticultural area are so distinguishable from the surrounding Columbia
Valley viticultural area that the proposed Ancient Lakes of Columbia
Valley viticultural area should no longer be part of the existing
viticultural area. The comment period closed on July 9, 2012.
In response to Notice No. 128, TTB received a total of three
comments regarding the proposed viticultural area: One from Cameron
Fries, one of the original petitioners; one from the executive director
of a Washington State non-profit wine tourism promotion association;
and one from the City Administrator of Quincy, Washington, commenting
on his own behalf. All three commenters supported the establishment of
the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural area as proposed in
Notice No. 128. TTB received no comments in opposition of the Ancient
Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural area as proposed. In regards to
the question of whether the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area was so distinct that it should be separated from the
existing Columbia Valley viticultural area, TTB received no comments.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition and the comments received in
response
[[Page 64035]]
to Notice No. 128, TTB finds that the evidence provided by the
petitioner supports the establishment of the 162,762-acre Ancient Lakes
of Columbia Valley viticultural area within the Columbia Valley
viticultural area. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act,
section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the
TTB regulations, TTB establishes the ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia
Valley'' viticultural area in Douglas, Grant, and Kittitas Counties,
Washington, effective 30 days from the publication date of this
document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the viticultural area in
the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioners provided the required maps, and TTB lists them
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. With the establishment of this viticultural area, its
name, ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley,'' is recognized as a name of
viticultural significance under 27 CFR 4.39(i)(3), as the text of this
regulation makes clear. Once this regulation becomes effective, wine
bottlers using ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley'' in a brand name,
including a trademark, or in another label reference as to the origin
of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is eligible to use
the viticultural area's name as an appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area will not affect any existing viticultural area, and
any bottlers using ``Columbia Valley'' as an appellation of origin or
in a brand name for wines made from grapes grown within the Ancient
Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural area will not be affected by the
establishment of this new viticultural area. The establishment of the
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural area will allow vintners
to use ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley'' and ``Columbia Valley'' as
appellations of origin for wines made from grapes grown within the
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural area.
For a wine to be eligible to use a viticultural area name as an
appellation of origin or a term of viticultural significance in a brand
name, at least 85 percent of the wine must be derived from grapes grown
within the area represented by that name or term, and the wine must
meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is
not eligible to use the viticultural area name as an appellation of
origin and that name or other term of viticultural significance appears
in the brand name, then the label is not in compliance and the bottler
must change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the viticultural area name or other term of viticultural
significance appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a
viticultural area name or other term of viticultural significance that
was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of a
viticultural area name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts
and consumer acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This final rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is
required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.227 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.227 Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley''. For purposes of part 4
of this chapter, ``Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley'' is a term of
viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 12 United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural area are titled:
(1) West Bar, Washington, 1966;
(2) Rock Island Dam, Washington, 1966;
(3) Appledale, Washington, 1966, photoinspected 1976;
(4) Monument Hill, Washington--Grant County, 1966;
(5) Ephrata SW., Washington--Grant County, 1956;
(6) Winchester, Washington--Grant County, 1966;
(7) Winchester SW., Washington--Grant County, 1966, photorevised
1978;
(8) Royal City, Washington--Grant County, provisional edition 1986
(formerly named Smyrna);
(9) Beverly NE., Washington--Grant County, 1965;
(10) Vantage, Washington, 1965, photorevised 1978;
(11) Ginkgo, Washington, 1953, photorevised 1978; and
(12) Cape Horn SE., Washington, 1966, photoinspected 1975.
(c) Boundary. The Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley viticultural
area is located in Douglas, Grant, and Kittitas Counties in central
Washington. The boundary of the Ancient Lakes of Columbia Valley
viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the West Bar map where the western
shoreline of the Columbia River in Kittitas County intersects with the
north boundary line of section 8, T20N/R22E. Proceed east along the
section boundaries for approximately 4.35 miles, over the Columbia
River and into Douglas County, to the intersection of the line with the
Grant and Douglas Counties common boundary line (concurrent with the
R22E and R23E common line) at the northwest corner of section 12, T20N/
R22E; then
(2) Proceed north along the Grant and Douglas Counties common
boundary line for approximately 2.25 miles, onto the Rock Island Dam
map, to the northwest corner of section 31, T21N/R23E; then
(3) Proceed east in a straight line along the section boundaries
for approximately 12.1 miles, over the Appledale and Monument Hills
maps, onto the Ephrata SW map to the
[[Page 64036]]
intersection of the line with the R24E and R25E common line at the
northwest corner of section 36, T21N/R24E; then
(4) Proceed south along the R24E and R25E common line for
approximately 22.5 miles, over the Winchester and Winchester SW maps,
onto the Royal City map, passing over the West Canal and into the
Frenchman Hills, to the southwest corner of section 12, T17N/R24E
(concurrent with the intersection of the R24E and R25E common line and
a single transmission line); then
(5) Proceed west in a straight line along the section boundaries
(marked for 3 sections by the single transmission line) for
approximately 4 miles, onto the Beverly NE map, to the southwest corner
of section 9, T17N/R24E; then
(6) Proceed north in a straight line along the section boundary for
approximately 1 mile to the northwest corner of section 9, T17N/R24E;
then
(7) Proceed west in a straight line along the section boundaries
for approximately 7.9 miles, onto the Vantage map, crossing over
Interstate Route 90 and Columbia River, to the western shoreline of the
Columbia River, at Hole in the Wall in Kittitas County, section 6,
T17N/R23E; and then
(8) Proceed north along the western shoreline of the meandering
Columbia River for approximately 23.3 miles, crossing over the Ginkgo
and Cape Horn SE maps, and onto the West Bar map, returning to the
beginning point.
Signed: September 18, 2012.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: September 27, 2012.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2012-25639 Filed 10-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P