Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes, 63275-63281 [2012-25463]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
01, dated June 19, 2012 (for Model ERJ 190–
100 STD, –100 LR, –100 ECJ, and –100 IGW
airplanes; and Model ERJ 190–200 STD, –200
LR, and –200 IGW airplanes).
(1) Do a general visual inspection of the
HRD bottle to determine if it is correctly
installed and if the pressure switch is in the
correct position. If the bottle is not correctly
installed or the pressure switch is in the
incorrect position, before further flight,
remove and re–install the HRD bottle.
(2) Inspect the HRD and LRD bottle
discharge heads to determine the part
number. If the part number of the discharge
heads is not the part number specified in
Figure 3 of EMBRAER Service Bulletin 170–
26–0011, Revision 01, dated June 19, 2012
(for Model ERJ 170–100 LR, –100 STD, –100
SE, and –100 SU airplanes; and Model ERJ
170–200 LR, –200 SU, and –200 STD
airplanes); EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190–
26–0011, Revision 01, dated June 19, 2012
(for Model ERJ 190–100 STD, –100 LR, –100
ECJ, and –100 IGW airplanes; and Model ERJ
190–200 STD, –200 LR, and –200 IGW
airplanes); or EMBRAER Service Bulletin
190LIN–26–0006, Revision 01, dated June 19,
2012 (for Model ERJ 190–100 STD, –100 LR,
–100 ECJ, and –100 IGW airplanes; and
Model ERJ 190–200 STD, –200 LR, and –200
IGW airplanes), before further flight, replace
the discharge bottle with a discharge bottle
having the same part number.
(j)(1)(ii), and (j)(1)(iii) of this AD, for related
information.
(i) EMBRAER Service Bulletin 170–26–
0011, Revision 01, dated June 19, 2012.
(ii) EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190–26–
0011, Revision 01, dated June 19, 2012.
(iii) EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190LIN–
26–0006, Revision 01, dated June 19, 2012.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Embraer S.A., Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
˜
Faria Lima, 2170–Putim–12227–901 Sao Jose
dos Campos–SP–BRASIL; telephone +55 12
3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax +55 12
3927–7546; email distrib@embraer.com.br;
Internet https://www.flyembraer.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2768; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA–approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA–approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Federal Aviation Administration
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directives 2012–07–01 and 2012–07–02, both
effective July 30, 2012, and the service
bulletins identified in paragraphs (j)(1)(i),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
5, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–25459 Filed 10–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1078; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–012–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to all Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model L–1011
series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections
to detect corrosion or fatigue cracking of
certain structural elements of the
airplane; corrective actions if necessary;
and incorporation of certain structural
modifications. Since we issued that AD,
we have received reports of small cracks
in additional areas outside those
addressed in the existing AD, prior to
the inspection threshold required by the
existing AD. This proposed AD would
reduce certain compliance times for the
initial inspection, and the repetitive
inspection interval for certain airplanes.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
corrosion or fatigue cracking of certain
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63275
structural elements, which could result
in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 30,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness
Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column
P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta,
Georgia 30063; telephone 770–494–
5444; fax 770–494–5445; email
ams.portal@lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–
474–5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
63276
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–1078; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–012–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On July 8, 2005, we issued AD 2005–
15–01, Amendment 39–14191 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005), for all Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model L–1011
series airplanes. That AD requires
repetitive inspections to detect
corrosion or fatigue cracking of certain
structural elements of the airplane;
corrective actions if necessary; and
incorporation of certain structural
modifications. That AD resulted from
new recommendations related to
incidents of fatigue cracking and
corrosion in transport category airplanes
that are approaching or have exceeded
their economic design goal. We issued
that AD to prevent corrosion or fatigue
cracking of certain structural elements,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14191 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005), we have received reports
of small cracks found outside the areas
addressed by the existing AD.
Specifically, these cracks were found
from inner wing station (IWS) 477.70 to
IWS 372.64 (inboard) and from outer
wing station (OWS) 52.2 to OWS 296.5
(outboard).
Relevant Service Information
AD 2005–15–01, Amendment 39–
14191 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005),
refers to Lockheed Tristar L–1011
Service Bulletin 093–51–041, Revision
1, dated March 3, 2000 (a ‘‘collector
service bulletin’’), as the appropriate
source of service information for the
required actions. This service bulletin
has since been revised. We have
reviewed Lockheed Service Bulletin
093–51–041, Revision 2, dated March
30, 2010, which, in turn, refers to
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–195,
now at Revision 4, dated March 17,
2010.
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–
195, Revision 4, dated March 17, 2010,
includes the following changes:
• Supersedes Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093–57–069, Revision 4, dated
October 5, 1998.
• Reduces the initial inspection
threshold to 15,000 flight cycles; or
15,000 flight cycles after incorporation
of Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–57–
069, Revision 4, dated October 5, 1998.
• Reduces the repetitive inspection
interval to 1,750 flight cycles for Model
L–1011–385–3 airplanes.
• Changes the fastener hole cold
working procedure from ‘‘FTI–LCC–
8701’’ to ‘‘FTI–LASC–51–20–01.’’
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of these same
type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all
requirements of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005). This proposed AD would
reduce the initial inspection threshold
for certain airplanes for accomplishment
of the actions specified in Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–57–195, Revision
4, dated March 17, 2010, and would
reduce the repetitive inspection interval
for Model L–1011–385–3 airplanes. This
proposed AD would also require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
Changes to Existing AD
This proposed AD would retain all
requirements of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14191 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005). Since AD 2005–15–01
was issued, the AD format has been
revised, and certain paragraphs have
been rearranged. As a result, the
corresponding paragraph identifiers
have changed in this proposed AD, as
listed in the following table:
REVISED PARAGRAPH IDENTIFIERS
Requirement in
AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment
39-14190 (70 FR
42262,
July 22, 2005)
Corresponding
requirement in this
proposed AD
paragraph (a)
paragraph (b)
paragraph (c)
paragraph (g).
paragraph (h).
paragraph (i).
In addition, we have removed
paragraph (b)(2) from AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005), and added a new
sentence to paragraph (h)(3) of this
proposed AD to specify that information
on additional methods of compliance
can be obtained from the Manager,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO). We might decide to approve
certain sections of the Lockheed L–1011
structural repair manual as an
alternative method of compliance with
this proposed AD, as provided by
paragraph (l) of this proposed AD.
We have also revised the applicability
of the existing AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005), to identify model
designations as published in the most
recent type certificate data sheet for the
affected models.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 26 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Action
Labor cost
Inspections [retained actions from existing
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14191 (70
42262, July 22, 2005)].
Modification [retained action from existing
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14191 (70
42262, July 22, 2005)].
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
AD
FR
AD
FR
Parts cost
129 work-hours × $85
per hour = $10,965
per inspection cycle.
614 work-hours × $85
per hour = $52,190.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Cost per product
$0
$142,275
Sfmt 4702
Cost on U.S. operators
$10,965 per inspection
cycle.
$285,090 per inspection
cycle.
$194,465 ......................
$5,056,194.
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the retained on-condition
actions specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
63277
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
385–1–14, L–1011–385–1–15, and L–1011–
385–3 airplanes; certificated in any category.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
(e) Unsafe Condition
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
This AD was prompted by reports of small
cracks in additional areas outside those
addressed in the existing AD (AD 2005–15–
01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262, July
22, 2005)), prior to the inspection threshold
required by the existing AD. We are issuing
this AD to prevent corrosion or fatigue
cracking of certain structural elements,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 51, Standard practices/structures; 52,
Doors; 53, Fuselage; 57, Wings.
(f) Compliance
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
(d) Subject
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70
FR 42262, July 22, 2005), and adding the
following new AD:
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company: Docket
No. FAA–2012–1078; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–012–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by November 30, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Model L–1011–385–1, L–1011–
(g) Retained Inspections With Revised
Service Information and Reduced
Compliance Times
This paragraph restates the inspection
required by paragraph (a) of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005), with revised service information and
reduced compliance times for paragraph
(g)(16) of this AD. At the time specified in
the ‘‘Initial Compliance Time’’ column of
table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD, perform
structural inspections to detect corrosion or
fatigue cracking of certain structural elements
of the airplane, in accordance with the
applicable service bulletins listed under
‘‘Service Bulletin Number, Revision, and
Date’’ in tables I and II of Lockheed Tristar
L–1011 Service Bulletin 093–51–041,
Revision 1, dated March 3, 2000, or Revision
2, dated March 30, 2010. As of the effective
date of this AD, only Lockheed Tristar L–
1011 Service Bulletin 093–51–041, Revision
2, dated March 30, 2010, may be used for the
actions required by this paragraph.
Thereafter, repeat the inspections at intervals
specified in the ‘‘Repetitive Intervals’’
column of table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS AD
Lockheed TriStar L–1011
Service Bulletin
Initial compliance time
(whichever occurs later between the times in ‘‘Inspection
Threshold’’ and ‘‘Grace Period’’)
Inspection threshold
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(1) 093–53–269, Revision
1, dated October 28,
1997; or.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Within 6,450 flight cycles
or 5 years after August
26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
Terminating action
Grace period
Before the accumulation of
8,000 total flight cycles
or 15,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
Repetitive intervals
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
At intervals not to exceed
6,450 flight cycles or 5
years, whichever occurs
first.
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
(None).
63278
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS AD—Continued
Lockheed TriStar L–1011
Service Bulletin
Initial compliance time
(whichever occurs later between the times in ‘‘Inspection
Threshold’’ and ‘‘Grace Period’’)
Repetitive intervals
Terminating action
Inspection threshold
(2) 093–53–274, dated
May 28, 1997.
(3) 093–53–275, dated December 10, 1996.
(4) 093–53–276, dated
June 17, 1996.
(5) 093–57–085, Revision
1, dated December 1,
1997.
Grace period
Within 14 months after August 26, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005–
15–01, Amendment 39–
14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005)).
Within 6,450 flight cycles
or 5 years after August
26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
At the next Corrosion Prevention and Control Program (CPCP) inspection
after August 26, 2005
(the effective date of AD
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005)).
Before the accumulation of
26,000 total flight cycles
or 48,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
(None) ...............................
At intervals not to exceed
14 months.
(None).
(None) ...............................
(None) ...............................
(None).
(None) ...............................
At intervals not to exceed
the next CPCP inspection.
(None).
Within 1,800 flight cycles
or 3,300 flight hours
after August 26, 2005
(the effective date of AD
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005)),
whichever occurs first.
Within 6,450 flight cycles
or 5 years after August
26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
(None) ...............................
At intervals not to exceed
1,800 flight cycles or
3,300 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–57–085, Basic
Issue, dated May 7,
1993; or Revision 1,
dated December 1,
1997.
(None).
(None) ...............................
(None).
(None) ...............................
(None) ...............................
(None).
Within 1,500 flight hours
after August 26, 2005
(the effective date of AD
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005)).
At intervals not to exceed
3,000 flight hours.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–53–070, Basic
Issue, dated September
26, 1974; Revision 1,
dated January 23, 1975;
Revision 2, dated July 7,
1975; or Revision 3,
dated September 19,
1989.
(6) 093–57–208, Revision
1, dated October 28,
1997.
Before the accumulation of
18,000 total flight cycles.
(7) 093–52–210, dated
July 19, 1991.
Within 5,000 flight hours or
18 months after August
26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
Within 6,450 flight cycles
or 5 years after August
26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
Before the accumulation of
6,000 total flight hours.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(8) 093–53–054, Revision
1, dated August 12,
1975.
(9) 093–53–070, Revision
3, dated September 19,
1989.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
At intervals not to exceed
6,450 flight cycles or 5
years, whichever occurs
first.
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
63279
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS AD—Continued
Lockheed TriStar L–1011
Service Bulletin
Initial compliance time
(whichever occurs later between the times in ‘‘Inspection
Threshold’’ and ‘‘Grace Period’’)
Inspection threshold
(10) 093–53–085, Revision
3, dated December 15,
1989.
Part I: Within 1,600 flight
cycles or 3,000 flight
hours after August 26,
2005 (the effective date
of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
Part II: Within 5,000 flight
cycles or 9,200 flight
hours after August 26,
2005 (the effective date
of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
Within 1,600 flight cycles
or 3,000 flight hours
after August 26, 2005
(the effective date of AD
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005)),
whichever occurs first.
Part II: Before the accumulation of 30,000 flight cycles or 55,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
(11) 093–53–086, Revision
5, dated April 12, 1990.
Before the accumulation of
9,000 flight cycles or
10,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
(12) 093–53–110, Revision
1, dated May 7, 1993.
Before the accumulation of
22,000 total flight cycles
or 40,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
(13) Change Notification
093–53–260, CN4, dated
May 8, 1998.
Before the accumulation of
8,000 total flight cycles
or 20,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
(14) Change Notification
093–53–266, CN1, dated
July 10, 1992.
Within 12 months after August 26, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005–
15–01, Amendment 39–
14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005)).
Before the accumulation of
20,000 total flight cycles
or 37,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(15) Change Notification
093–57–058, R5–CN1,
dated May 3, 1993.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Terminating action
Part I: At intervals not to
exceed 1,600 flight cycles or 3,000 flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–53–085, Basic
Issue, dated September
29, 1975; Revision 1,
dated September 3,
1976; or Revision 2,
dated February 8, 1988.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–53–085, Basic
Issue, dated September
29, 1975; Revision 1,
dated September 3,
1976; or Revision 2,
dated February 8, 1988.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–53–086, Basic
Issue, dated September
26, 1975; Revision 1,
dated November 12,
1975; Revision 2, dated
December 12, 1976; Revision 3, dated July 19,
1977; Revision 4, dated
July 8, 1985; or Revision
5, dated April 12, 1990.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–53–110, Basic
Issue, dated August 19,
1991; or Revision 1,
dated May 7, 1993.
Grace period
Part I: Before the accumulation of 20,000 flight cycles or 37,000 total flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
Repetitive intervals
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Within 2,200 flight cycles
or 4,000 flight hours
after August 26, 2005
(the effective date of AD
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005)),
whichever occurs first.
Within 800 flight cycles or
1,500 flight hours after
August 26, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005–
15–01, Amendment 39–
14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005)), whichever occurs first.
(None) ...............................
Within 1,600 flight cycles
or 3,000 flight hours
after August 26, 2005
(the effective date of AD
2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005)),
whichever occurs first.
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Part II: At intervals not to
exceed 5,000 flight cycles or 9,200 flight
hours, whichever occurs
first.
At intervals not to exceed
1,600 flight cycles or
3,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
At intervals not to exceed
2,200 flight cycles or
4,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
At intervals not to exceed
800 flight cycles or
1,500 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
Inspection and modification in accordance with
Part 2.A. of Lockheed
TriStar L–1011 Service
Bulletin 093–53–260,
Basic Issue, dated May
15, 1991.
At intervals not to exceed
90 days.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–53–266, Basic
Issue, dated March 2,
1992.
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–57–058, Basic
Issue, dated September
16, 1975; Revision 1,
dated December 1,
1976; Revision 2, dated
June 30, 1978; Revision
3, dated October 19,
1978; or Revision 4,
dated July 6, 1981, Revision 5, dated June 9,
1983.
At intervals not to exceed
1,600 flight cycles or
3,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
63280
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS AD—Continued
Lockheed TriStar L–1011
Service Bulletin
Initial compliance time
(whichever occurs later between the times in ‘‘Inspection
Threshold’’ and ‘‘Grace Period’’)
Repetitive intervals
Inspection threshold
Grace period
(16) Change Notification
093–57–195, R3–CN1,
dated August 22, 1995,
or Lockheed TriStar L–
1011 Service Bulletin
093–57–195, Revision 4,
dated March 17, 2010.
At the applicable time
specified in paragraph (j)
of this AD.
At the applicable time
specified in paragraph (j)
of this AD.
At the applicable time
specified in paragraph
(k) of this AD.
(17) Change Notification
093–57–213, CN1, dated
February 20, 1996.
For Model L–1011–385–1,
L–1011–385–1–14, L–
1011–385–1–15: Before
the accumulation of
15,000 total flight cycles.
For Model L–1011–385–3:
Before the accumulation
of 10,000 total flight cycles.
Within 6,450 flight cycles
or 5 years after August
26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01,
Amendment 39–14190
(70 FR 42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever occurs first.
At intervals not to exceed
6,450 flight cycles or 5
years, whichever occurs
first.
(h) Retained Corrective Action With a
Certain Compliance Method Removed
(j) Newly Revised Initial Inspection
Compliance Time for Certain Airplanes
This paragraph restates the corrective
action required by paragraph (b) of AD 2005–
15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005), with certain exceptions. If any
cracking or corrosion is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the
actions specified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2),
or (h)(3) of this AD.
(1) Repair in accordance with the
applicable service bulletin referenced in table
I or II of Lockheed Tristar L–1011 Service
Bulletin 093–51–041, Revision 1, dated
March 3, 2000, or Revision 2, dated March
30, 2010.
(2) Accomplish the terminating
modification in accordance with the
applicable service bulletin referenced in table
I or II of Lockheed Tristar L–1011 Service
Bulletin 093–51–041, Revision 1, dated
March 3, 2000, or Revision 2, dated March
30, 2010.
(3) Repair in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Information
on additional methods of compliance can be
obtained from the Manager, Atlanta ACO.
For airplanes identified in Lockheed
TriStar L–1011 Service Bulletin 093–57–195,
Revision 4, dated March 17, 2010: Do the
initial inspection required by paragraph
(g)(16) of this AD at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this
AD.
(1) For airplanes having serial numbers (S/
Ns) 1002 through 1109 inclusive: At the
earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(j)(1)(i) and (j)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total
flight cycles, or within 2,200 flight cycles
after August 26, 2005 (the effective date of
AD 2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70
FR 42262, July 22, 2005)), whichever occurs
later.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total
flight cycles, or within 2,200 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(2) For airplanes having S/Ns 1110 through
1250 inclusive: At the earlier of the times
specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i) and (j)(2)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total
flight cycles, or within 2,200 flight cycles
after August 26, 2005 (the effective date of
AD 2005–15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70
FR 42262, July 22, 2005)), whichever occurs
later.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total
flight cycles, or within 2,200 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(i) Retained Terminating Action
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Terminating action
This paragraph restates the terminating
action required by paragraph (c) of AD 2005–
15–01, Amendment 39–14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005). Within 5 years or 5,000 flight
cycles after August 26, 2005 (the effective
date of AD 2005–15–01), whichever occurs
first, install the terminating modification
referenced in the applicable service bulletin
listed in table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD,
in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin. Such installation constitutes
terminating action for the applicable
structural inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
(k) Newly Revised Repetitive Intervals for
Certain Airplanes
For airplanes identified in paragraph (j) of
this AD, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (j) of this AD thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph (k)(1)
or (k)(2) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes having S/Ns 1002 through
1156 inclusive: Repeat the inspection at
intervals not to exceed 2,200 flight cycles.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Modification in accordance
with Lockheed TriStar
L–1011 Service Bulletin
093–57–195, Revision 2,
dated July 27, 1990; Revision 3, dated June 30,
1992; or Revision 4,
dated March 17, 2010
Repair or modification in
accordance with Lockheed TriStar L–1011
Service Bulletin 093–57–
213, Basic Issue, dated
December 9, 1994.
(2) For airplanes having S/Ns 1157 through
1250 inclusive: Repeat the inspection one
time within 2,200 flight cycles after the most
recent inspection; and thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 1,750 flight cycles.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–474–
5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M,
Zone 0252, Column P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive,
Marietta, Georgia 30063; telephone 770–494–
5444; fax 770–494–5445; email
ams.portal@lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may review copies of
the referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
5, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–25463 Filed 10–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1072; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–141–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of two in-service
incidents where the left main landing
gear (MLG) failed to extend. This
proposed AD would require installing
stopper plates on the aft uplock frames
in the MLG bay adjacent to the right and
left MLG uplock assemblies. We are
proposing this AD to prevent incorrect
installation of the upper bolt in the MLG
uplock assembly, which could prevent
the MLG from extending and adversely
affect the safe landing of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 30,
2012.
SUMMARY:
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Oct 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
514–855–5000; fax 514-855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; phone: 516–228–7328;
fax: 516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–1072; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–141–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2012–22,
dated July 24, 2012 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
There have been two reported in-service
incidents where the left main landing gear
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63281
(MLG) failed to extend. The investigation
revealed that in both cases, the uplock
assembly had been replaced prior to the inservice incidents and the upper bolt of the
uplock assembly was incorrectly installed.
The incorrect installation of the upper bolt
resulted in the uplock assembly pivoting on
the lower attachment bolt and preventing the
MLG from extending under normal or
alternate extension
The potential for an incorrect installation of
the upper bolt could occur at both the left
hand side (LHS) and/or the right hand side
(RHS) MLG uplock assembly. Failure of the
MLG to extend could adversely affect the safe
landing of the aeroplane.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the installation
of stopper plates on the aft uplock frames in
the MLG bay, adjacent to both the RHS and
LHS MLG uplock assemblies, to prevent an
incorrect installation of the MLG uplock
assembly.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier, Inc. has issued Service
Bulletin 601R–32–109, dated May 29,
2012. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 574 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 5 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$243,950, or $425 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
E:\FR\FM\16OCP1.SGM
16OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63275-63281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25463]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1078; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-012-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model L-1011 series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections to detect corrosion or
fatigue cracking of certain structural elements of the airplane;
corrective actions if necessary; and incorporation of certain
structural modifications. Since we issued that AD, we have received
reports of small cracks in additional areas outside those addressed in
the existing AD, prior to the inspection threshold required by the
existing AD. This proposed AD would reduce certain compliance times for
the initial inspection, and the repetitive inspection interval for
certain airplanes. We are proposing this AD to prevent corrosion or
fatigue cracking of certain structural elements, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 30,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness
Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta,
Georgia 30063; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-5445; email
ams.portal@lmco.com; Internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: 404-
474-5554; fax: 404-474-5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about
[[Page 63276]]
this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-1078; Directorate
Identifier 2011-NM-012-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On July 8, 2005, we issued AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14191 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005), for all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model L-1011 series airplanes. That AD
requires repetitive inspections to detect corrosion or fatigue cracking
of certain structural elements of the airplane; corrective actions if
necessary; and incorporation of certain structural modifications. That
AD resulted from new recommendations related to incidents of fatigue
cracking and corrosion in transport category airplanes that are
approaching or have exceeded their economic design goal. We issued that
AD to prevent corrosion or fatigue cracking of certain structural
elements, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14191 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005), we have received reports of small cracks found outside
the areas addressed by the existing AD. Specifically, these cracks were
found from inner wing station (IWS) 477.70 to IWS 372.64 (inboard) and
from outer wing station (OWS) 52.2 to OWS 296.5 (outboard).
Relevant Service Information
AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14191 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005),
refers to Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service Bulletin 093-51-041, Revision
1, dated March 3, 2000 (a ``collector service bulletin''), as the
appropriate source of service information for the required actions.
This service bulletin has since been revised. We have reviewed Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093-51-041, Revision 2, dated March 30, 2010, which,
in turn, refers to Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-195, now at
Revision 4, dated March 17, 2010.
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-195, Revision 4, dated March 17,
2010, includes the following changes:
Supersedes Lockheed Service Bulletin 093-57-069, Revision
4, dated October 5, 1998.
Reduces the initial inspection threshold to 15,000 flight
cycles; or 15,000 flight cycles after incorporation of Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093-57-069, Revision 4, dated October 5, 1998.
Reduces the repetitive inspection interval to 1,750 flight
cycles for Model L-1011-385-3 airplanes.
Changes the fastener hole cold working procedure from
``FTI-LCC-8701'' to ``FTI-LASC-51-20-01.''
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005). This proposed AD would
reduce the initial inspection threshold for certain airplanes for
accomplishment of the actions specified in Lockheed Service Bulletin
093-57-195, Revision 4, dated March 17, 2010, and would reduce the
repetitive inspection interval for Model L-1011-385-3 airplanes. This
proposed AD would also require accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described previously.
Changes to Existing AD
This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39-14191 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005). Since AD 2005-15-01
was issued, the AD format has been revised, and certain paragraphs have
been rearranged. As a result, the corresponding paragraph identifiers
have changed in this proposed AD, as listed in the following table:
Revised Paragraph Identifiers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirement in AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39[dash]14190 (70 FR Corresponding requirement in this
42262, July 22, 2005) proposed AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
paragraph (a) paragraph (g).
paragraph (b) paragraph (h).
paragraph (c) paragraph (i).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, we have removed paragraph (b)(2) from AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005), and added a new
sentence to paragraph (h)(3) of this proposed AD to specify that
information on additional methods of compliance can be obtained from
the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO). We might
decide to approve certain sections of the Lockheed L-1011 structural
repair manual as an alternative method of compliance with this proposed
AD, as provided by paragraph (l) of this proposed AD.
We have also revised the applicability of the existing AD 2005-15-
01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005), to identify model
designations as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected models.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 26 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections [retained actions 129 work-hours x $0 $10,965 per $285,090 per
from existing AD 2005-15-01, $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
Amendment 39-14191 (70 FR 42262, $10,965 per
July 22, 2005)]. inspection cycle.
Modification [retained action 614 work-hours x $142,275 $194,465........... $5,056,194.
from existing AD 2005-15-01, $85 per hour =
Amendment 39-14191 (70 FR 42262, $52,190.
July 22, 2005)].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 63277]]
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the retained on-condition actions specified in this
proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005), and
adding the following new AD:
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company:
Docket No. FAA-2012-1078; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-012-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by November 30,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22, 2005).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model L-1011-385-1, L-1011-385-1-14, L-
1011-385-1-15, and L-1011-385-3 airplanes; certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 51, Standard practices/structures; 52, Doors;
53, Fuselage; 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of small cracks in additional
areas outside those addressed in the existing AD (AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005)), prior to the
inspection threshold required by the existing AD. We are issuing
this AD to prevent corrosion or fatigue cracking of certain
structural elements, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Inspections With Revised Service Information and Reduced
Compliance Times
This paragraph restates the inspection required by paragraph (a)
of AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005),
with revised service information and reduced compliance times for
paragraph (g)(16) of this AD. At the time specified in the ``Initial
Compliance Time'' column of table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD,
perform structural inspections to detect corrosion or fatigue
cracking of certain structural elements of the airplane, in
accordance with the applicable service bulletins listed under
``Service Bulletin Number, Revision, and Date'' in tables I and II
of Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service Bulletin 093-51-041, Revision 1,
dated March 3, 2000, or Revision 2, dated March 30, 2010. As of the
effective date of this AD, only Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service
Bulletin 093-51-041, Revision 2, dated March 30, 2010, may be used
for the actions required by this paragraph. Thereafter, repeat the
inspections at intervals specified in the ``Repetitive Intervals''
column of table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD.
Table 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial compliance time (whichever
occurs later between the times in
``Inspection Threshold'' and ``Grace
Lockheed TriStar L-1011 Service Period'') Repetitive Terminating action
Bulletin ---------------------------------------- intervals
Inspection
threshold Grace period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) 093-53-269, Revision 1, Before the Within 6,450 At intervals not (None).
dated October 28, 1997; or. accumulation of flight cycles or to exceed 6,450
8,000 total 5 years after flight cycles or
flight cycles or August 26, 2005 5 years,
15,000 total (the effective whichever occurs
flight hours, date of AD 2005- first.
whichever occurs 15-01, Amendment
first. 39-14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
[[Page 63278]]
(2) 093-53-274, dated May 28, Within 14 months (None)............ At intervals not (None).
1997. after August 26, to exceed 14
2005 (the months.
effective date of
AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39-
14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)).
(3) 093-53-275, dated December Within 6,450 (None)............ (None)............ (None).
10, 1996. flight cycles or
5 years after
August 26, 2005
(the effective
date of AD 2005-
15-01, Amendment
39-14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(4) 093-53-276, dated June 17, At the next (None)............ At intervals not (None).
1996. Corrosion to exceed the
Prevention and next CPCP
Control Program inspection.
(CPCP) inspection
after August 26,
2005 (the
effective date of
AD 2005-15-01,
Amendment 39-
14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)).
(5) 093-57-085, Revision 1, Before the Within 1,800 At intervals not Modification in
dated December 1, 1997. accumulation of flight cycles or to exceed 1,800 accordance with
26,000 total 3,300 flight flight cycles or Lockheed TriStar
flight cycles or hours after 3,300 flight L-1011 Service
48,000 total August 26, 2005 hours, whichever Bulletin 093-57-
flight hours, (the effective occurs first. 085, Basic Issue,
whichever occurs date of AD 2005- dated May 7,
first. 15-01, Amendment 1993; or Revision
39-14190 (70 FR 1, dated December
42262, July 22, 1, 1997.
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(6) 093-57-208, Revision 1, Before the Within 6,450 At intervals not (None).
dated October 28, 1997. accumulation of flight cycles or to exceed 6,450
18,000 total 5 years after flight cycles or
flight cycles. August 26, 2005 5 years,
(the effective whichever occurs
date of AD 2005- first.
15-01, Amendment
39-14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(7) 093-52-210, dated July 19, Within 5,000 (None)............ (None)............ (None).
1991. flight hours or
18 months after
August 26, 2005
(the effective
date of AD 2005-
15-01, Amendment
39-14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(8) 093-53-054, Revision 1, Within 6,450 (None)............ (None)............ (None).
dated August 12, 1975. flight cycles or
5 years after
August 26, 2005
(the effective
date of AD 2005-
15-01, Amendment
39-14190 (70 FR
42262, July 22,
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(9) 093-53-070, Revision 3, Before the Within 1,500 At intervals not Modification in
dated September 19, 1989. accumulation of flight hours to exceed 3,000 accordance with
6,000 total after August 26, flight hours. Lockheed TriStar
flight hours. 2005 (the L-1011 Service
effective date of Bulletin 093-53-
AD 2005-15-01, 070, Basic Issue,
Amendment 39- dated September
14190 (70 FR 26, 1974;
42262, July 22, Revision 1, dated
2005)). January 23, 1975;
Revision 2, dated
July 7, 1975; or
Revision 3, dated
September 19,
1989.
[[Page 63279]]
(10) 093-53-085, Revision 3, Part I: Before the Part I: Within Part I: At Modification in
dated December 15, 1989. accumulation of 1,600 flight intervals not to accordance with
20,000 flight cycles or 3,000 exceed 1,600 Lockheed TriStar
cycles or 37,000 flight hours flight cycles or L-1011 Service
total flight after August 26, 3,000 flight Bulletin 093-53-
hours, whichever 2005 (the hours, whichever 085, Basic Issue,
occurs first. effective date of occurs first. dated September
AD 2005-15-01, 29, 1975;
Amendment 39- Revision 1, dated
14190 (70 FR September 3,
42262, July 22, 1976; or Revision
2005)), whichever 2, dated February
occurs first. 8, 1988.
Part II: Before Part II: Within Part II: At Modification in
the accumulation 5,000 flight intervals not to accordance with
of 30,000 flight cycles or 9,200 exceed 5,000 Lockheed TriStar
cycles or 55,000 flight hours flight cycles or L-1011 Service
total flight after August 26, 9,200 flight Bulletin 093-53-
hours, whichever 2005 (the hours, whichever 085, Basic Issue,
occurs first. effective date of occurs first. dated September
AD 2005-15-01, 29, 1975;
Amendment 39- Revision 1, dated
14190 (70 FR September 3,
42262, July 22, 1976; or Revision
2005)), whichever 2, dated February
occurs first. 8, 1988.
(11) 093-53-086, Revision 5, Before the Within 1,600 At intervals not Modification in
dated April 12, 1990. accumulation of flight cycles or to exceed 1,600 accordance with
9,000 flight 3,000 flight flight cycles or Lockheed TriStar
cycles or 10,000 hours after 3,000 flight L-1011 Service
flight hours, August 26, 2005 hours, whichever Bulletin 093-53-
whichever occurs (the effective occurs first. 086, Basic Issue,
first. date of AD 2005- dated September
15-01, Amendment 26, 1975;
39-14190 (70 FR Revision 1, dated
42262, July 22, November 12,
2005)), whichever 1975; Revision 2,
occurs first. dated December
12, 1976;
Revision 3, dated
July 19, 1977;
Revision 4, dated
July 8, 1985; or
Revision 5, dated
April 12, 1990.
(12) 093-53-110, Revision 1, Before the Within 2,200 At intervals not Modification in
dated May 7, 1993. accumulation of flight cycles or to exceed 2,200 accordance with
22,000 total 4,000 flight flight cycles or Lockheed TriStar
flight cycles or hours after 4,000 flight L-1011 Service
40,000 total August 26, 2005 hours, whichever Bulletin 093-53-
flight hours, (the effective occurs first. 110, Basic Issue,
whichever occurs date of AD 2005- dated August 19,
first. 15-01, Amendment 1991; or Revision
39-14190 (70 FR 1, dated May 7,
42262, July 22, 1993.
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(13) Change Notification 093-53- Before the Within 800 flight At intervals not Inspection and
260, CN4, dated May 8, 1998. accumulation of cycles or 1,500 to exceed 800 modification in
8,000 total flight hours flight cycles or accordance with
flight cycles or after August 26, 1,500 flight Part 2.A. of
20,000 total 2005 (the hours, whichever Lockheed TriStar
flight hours, effective date of occurs first. L-1011 Service
whichever occurs AD 2005-15-01, Bulletin 093-53-
first. Amendment 39- 260, Basic Issue,
14190 (70 FR dated May 15,
42262, July 22, 1991.
2005)), whichever
occurs first.
(14) Change Notification 093-53- Within 12 months (None)............ At intervals not Modification in
266, CN1, dated July 10, 1992. after August 26, to exceed 90 days. accordance with
2005 (the Lockheed TriStar
effective date of L-1011 Service
AD 2005-15-01, Bulletin 093-53-
Amendment 39- 266, Basic Issue,
14190 (70 FR dated March 2,
42262, July 22, 1992.
2005)).
(15) Change Notification 093-57- Before the Within 1,600 At intervals not Modification in
058, R5-CN1, dated May 3, 1993. accumulation of flight cycles or to exceed 1,600 accordance with
20,000 total 3,000 flight flight cycles or Lockheed TriStar
flight cycles or hours after 3,000 flight L-1011 Service
37,000 total August 26, 2005 hours, whichever Bulletin 093-57-
flight hours, (the effective occurs first. 058, Basic Issue,
whichever occurs date of AD 2005- dated September
first. 15-01, Amendment 16, 1975;
39-14190 (70 FR Revision 1, dated
42262, July 22, December 1, 1976;
2005)), whichever Revision 2, dated
occurs first. June 30, 1978;
Revision 3, dated
October 19, 1978;
or Revision 4,
dated July 6,
1981, Revision 5,
dated June 9,
1983.
[[Page 63280]]
(16) Change Notification 093-57- At the applicable At the applicable At the applicable Modification in
195, R3-CN1, dated August 22, time specified in time specified in time specified in accordance with
1995, or Lockheed TriStar L- paragraph (j) of paragraph (j) of paragraph (k) of Lockheed TriStar
1011 Service Bulletin 093-57- this AD. this AD. this AD. L-1011 Service
195, Revision 4, dated March Bulletin 093-57-
17, 2010. 195, Revision 2,
dated July 27,
1990; Revision 3,
dated June 30,
1992; or Revision
4, dated March
17, 2010
(17) Change Notification 093-57- For Model L-1011- Within 6,450 At intervals not Repair or
213, CN1, dated February 20, 385-1, L-1011-385- flight cycles or to exceed 6,450 modification in
1996. 1-14, L-1011-385- 5 years after flight cycles or accordance with
1-15: Before the August 26, 2005 5 years, Lockheed TriStar
accumulation of (the effective whichever occurs L-1011 Service
15,000 total date of AD 2005- first. Bulletin 093-57-
flight cycles. 15-01, Amendment 213, Basic Issue,
For Model L-1011- 39-14190 (70 FR dated December 9,
385-3: Before the 42262, July 22, 1994.
accumulation of 2005)), whichever
10,000 total occurs first.
flight cycles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h) Retained Corrective Action With a Certain Compliance Method Removed
This paragraph restates the corrective action required by
paragraph (b) of AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005), with certain exceptions. If any cracking or
corrosion is detected during any inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the actions
specified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3) of this AD.
(1) Repair in accordance with the applicable service bulletin
referenced in table I or II of Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service
Bulletin 093-51-041, Revision 1, dated March 3, 2000, or Revision 2,
dated March 30, 2010.
(2) Accomplish the terminating modification in accordance with
the applicable service bulletin referenced in table I or II of
Lockheed Tristar L-1011 Service Bulletin 093-51-041, Revision 1,
dated March 3, 2000, or Revision 2, dated March 30, 2010.
(3) Repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Information on
additional methods of compliance can be obtained from the Manager,
Atlanta ACO.
(i) Retained Terminating Action
This paragraph restates the terminating action required by
paragraph (c) of AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262,
July 22, 2005). Within 5 years or 5,000 flight cycles after August
26, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-15-01), whichever occurs
first, install the terminating modification referenced in the
applicable service bulletin listed in table 1 to paragraph (g) of
this AD, in accordance with the applicable service bulletin. Such
installation constitutes terminating action for the applicable
structural inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Newly Revised Initial Inspection Compliance Time for Certain
Airplanes
For airplanes identified in Lockheed TriStar L-1011 Service
Bulletin 093-57-195, Revision 4, dated March 17, 2010: Do the
initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(16) of this AD at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes having serial numbers (S/Ns) 1002 through 1109
inclusive: At the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(j)(1)(i) and (j)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or
within 2,200 flight cycles after August 26, 2005 (the effective date
of AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005)),
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or
within 2,200 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes having S/Ns 1110 through 1250 inclusive: At
the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i) and
(j)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total flight cycles, or
within 2,200 flight cycles after August 26, 2005 (the effective date
of AD 2005-15-01, Amendment 39-14190 (70 FR 42262, July 22, 2005)),
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or
within 2,200 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(k) Newly Revised Repetitive Intervals for Certain Airplanes
For airplanes identified in paragraph (j) of this AD, repeat the
inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes having S/Ns 1002 through 1156 inclusive:
Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 2,200 flight
cycles.
(2) For airplanes having S/Ns 1157 through 1250 inclusive:
Repeat the inspection one time within 2,200 flight cycles after the
most recent inspection; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
1,750 flight cycles.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Carl Gray,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
Georgia 30337; phone: 404-474-5554; fax: 404-474-5605; email:
carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb
Drive, Marietta, Georgia 30063; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-
5445; email ams.portal@lmco.com; Internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
[[Page 63281]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 5, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-25463 Filed 10-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P