Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling, 62476-62479 [2012-25138]

Download as PDF 62476 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 AGENCY: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1 2. Amend § 165.1319 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 165.1319 Safety Zone Regulations; Seafair Blue Angels Air Show Performance, Seattle, WA. erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with * * * * (b) Location. The following is a safety zone: All waters of Lake Washington encompassed by the following points: 47°36′17.28″ N, 122°14′49.44″ W; thence west to point 47°36′17.28″ N, 122°16′58.56″ W; thence south along the shoreline to Andrews Bay at point 47°33′04.62″ N, 122°15′32.46″ W; thence northeast along the shoreline of Bailey Peninsula to its northeast point at 47°33′44.98″ N, 122°15′03.48″ W; thence easterly to point 47°33′43.98″ N, 122°13′51.36″ W on Mercer Island; thence northerly along the shore of Mercer Island to point 47°35′45.12″ N, 122°14′49.44″ W; thence north back to the point of origin. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2012–25237 Filed 10–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Oct 12, 2012 Jkt 229001 [NPS–SLBE–10552; 6620–SZM] RIN 1024–AE11 Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling National Park Service, Interior. Proposed rule. The National Park Service proposes to designate the Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail currently under construction within Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore as a route for bicycle use. The approximately 27-milelong trail will generally parallel major state highways and offer visitors safe, non-motorized access to the park. National Park Service general regulations require promulgation of a special regulation to designate routes for bicycle use outside developed areas or off park roads. DATES: Comments must be received by December 14, 2012. ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulation Identifier Number (RIN), by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail or Hand Deliver to: Superintendent’s Office, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 9922 Front Street, Empire, Michigan 49630. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil Akers, Chief Ranger, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 231–326– 5135, or at 9922 Front Street, Empire, Michigan 49630. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 165, as follows: Dated: September 25, 2012. S.J. Ferguson, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound. 36 CFR Part 7 ACTION: Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. * National Park Service Background Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore (SLBE or Lakeshore) was established in 1970 ‘‘for the benefit, inspiration, education, recreation, and enjoyment of the public.’’ (16 U.S.C. 460x). SLBE’s enabling legislation requires the National Park Service (NPS) to ‘‘administer and protect [the Lakeshore] in a manner which provides for recreational opportunities consistent with the maximum protection of the natural environment within the area.’’ (16 U.S.C. 460x). The 71,000-acre Lakeshore is located in the northwest portion of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula and encompasses a 35-mile stretch of Lake Michigan’s eastern coastline as well as North Manitou and South PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Manitou islands. The mainland portion is located within Benzie and Leelanau counties. The Manitou Islands, in Leelanau County, are located to the northwest in Lake Michigan, about seven miles from the shore. The nearest city is Traverse City, Michigan (population 15,000), located 30 miles east of the Lakeshore. Smaller communities such as Empire, Glen Arbor, and Frankfort are closer. Named after a complex of coastal sand dunes, the Lakeshore features white sand beaches, steep bluffs reaching as high as 450 feet above Lake Michigan, thick maple and beech forests, and clear inland lakes. The Lakeshore’s most notable features—the ancient sand dunes—are products of wind, ice, and water action over thousands of years. The high, perched dunes afford spectacular views across Lake Michigan and of other glacially formed landscapes. The contrast between the open, sunny environment of the dunes and the adjacent lush beech-maple forests is striking. The Robert H. Manning Memorial Lighthouse, three former U.S. LifeSaving Service/Coast Guard stations, several coastal villages, and picturesque farmsteads reflect the Lakeshore’s rich maritime, agricultural, and recreational history. The region surrounding the Lakeshore is a popular vacation and summer home destination. SLBE offers visitors recreational activities such as hiking, backpacking, kayaking, crosscountry skiing, backcountry camping, hunting, fishing, and boating. Over 1.1 million people visit the Lakeshore annually. SLBE’s main visitor attractions include the Dune Climb (330,000+ visitors/year), Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive (430,000 visitors/year), and the Visitor Center (130,000+ visitors/ year). Traffic and parking congestion are a concern at these locations. A multi-use trail connecting the main visitor destinations would help relieve these traffic concerns while simultaneously enhancing visitor access to a variety of recreational activities. History of Bicycle Use Currently, bicycling within SLBE is allowed only on a lane shared with motor vehicles on Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive and on the road shoulders of state highways (M–22 and M–109) and county roads than run through the Lakeshore. The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail (SBHT) will be a hard-surfaced, approximately 27-mile-long trail from the southern Leelanau County line at Manning Road to County Road 651 at E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM 15OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with Good Harbor Beach. The trail will be separated from the roadway wherever possible, providing a safe, nonmotorized route connecting the Lakeshore’s main visitor destinations with neighboring communities in Glen Arbor and Empire. Construction of the first segment of the trail was completed in June 2012, with the remainder to be constructed over a period of approximately 10 years. The route will generally parallel state highways M–22 and M–109, but will occasionally depart from these rights-of-way to take advantage of other existing corridors, such as old logging trails and a narrow gauge railbed. By using other disturbed areas whenever feasible, the location of the SBHT will minimize disturbance to Lakeshore resources. The SBHT will be located entirely on public lands within the Lakeshore. Moving bicycle traffic off roads used by motor vehicles will reduce safety hazards and enhance opportunities for non-motorized enjoyment of the Lakeshore. It will also encourage the use of alternate means of transportation by park employees and park visitors to access these extremely popular areas. The SBHT will give bicyclists, walkers, runners, wheelchair users, rollerbladers, and cross-country skiers a safe, enjoyable, and healthy way to access and explore the Lakeshore. Maps depicting the planned trail route including the completed first segment are available for review in the office of the Superintendent and on the Lakeshore’s Web site at http:// www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/ planning.htm. Trail Planning and Environmental Analyses The idea for a multi-use trail came from the Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Committee (LSHR), which was created by the State of Michigan to preserve the historical integrity and safety of state highways M–22, M–109, and M–204. The LSHR is a broad partnership with representatives from 12 municipalities, the Lakeshore, the Michigan Department of Transportation, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, the Leelanau Conservancy, the Leelanau County Road Commission, the Leelanau County Planning Commission, chambers of commerce, interested organizations, and citizens. Planning for the trail began in 2005 when the LSHR suggested the concept to the NPS. In 2006, the LSHR created a Trailway Work Group to develop a multi-use trail along the M–22 and M– 109 corridor in the Lakeshore. The Work Group included representatives of VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Oct 12, 2012 Jkt 229001 SLBE, the Michigan Department of Transportation, local townships and villages, and other interested groups and citizens. Through the LSHR, the public had many opportunities for involvement in planning the SBHT. The public provided input and review at various meetings and activities, including over 25 LSHR Committee meetings and 15 Trailway Work Group meetings from 2005 to 2008, and Port Oneida Days at the Lakeshore in August 2006 and 2007. In 2006 the LSHR staff also made introductory presentations to local governments, with follow-up presentations made in 2008. The multi-use trail concept, including bicycle use, and the trail route were considered in the preferred alternative of SLBE’s October 2008 Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/ Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/ EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) signed by the NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS Mid-West Regional Director in January 2009. In March 2009, SLBE published the Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Trailway Plan and Environmental Assessment (EA) which evaluated the environmental impacts of a no-action alterative and two action alternatives, including one identified as the preferred alternative. The Leelanau Scenic Heritage Trailway route was named the Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail, and in August 2009, the NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS Mid-West Regional Director signed a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The FONSI identified the preferred alternative as the selected action and concluded that the construction of the multi-use trail, which would include bicycle use, would not have a significant effect on the human environment. The GMP/EIS, ROD, EA, FONSI, and related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore’s planning Web site at http://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/ planning.htm. Proposed Rule The SBHT will generally be constructed in M–22/M–109 and county road rights-of-way, and primarily within developed area zones as described in the Lakeshore’s GMP. However, the trail route will occasionally deviate from the highway corridor and outside of developed areas as previously described in this rule, to provide access to natural, cultural, and recreation resources, and to promote a broader variety of experiences for the trailway user. Therefore SLBE is pursuing promulgation of a special regulation for bicycle use, as required by 36 CFR 4.30. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 62477 Accordingly, the proposed rule would add a new paragraph to 36 CFR 7.80, designating the proposed 27-mile-long SBHT as a route for bicycle use. The proposed rule also grants the Superintendent the authority to impose closures or restrictions upon bicycle use on designated trails after taking into consideration public health and safety, resource protection, and other management activities and objectives, provided public notice is given under 36 CFR 1.7. The NPS now seeks comments on its proposal to designate this as a route for bicycle use. The construction of the SBHT as a multi-use trail, as stated above, was a separate decision and is not at issue in this proposal. Compliance With Other Laws and Executive Orders Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563) Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not significant. Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order 12866 while calling for improvements in the nation’s regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information contained in the report entitled ‘‘Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Trailway, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore’’ (NPS Environmental Quality Division—May 2012), available for review at http://www.nps.gov/slbe/ parkmgmt/planning.htm. E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM 15OCP1 62478 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule: a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions. c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The rule would not require fees, or involve other measures that would increase costs to visitors or businesses. Rather, this rule would reasonably increase Lakeshore visitation and thereby generate benefits for businesses through increased visitor spending. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other agencies or governments. A statement containing the information required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required. Takings (Executive Order 12630) Under the criteria in section 2 of Executive Order 12630, this rule does not have significant takings implications. The rule will not deny any property owner beneficial uses, or reduce the value, of their land. No taking of property will occur as a result of this rule. A takings implication assessment is not required. Federalism (Executive Order 13132) erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This proposed rule only affects use of NPS administered lands and waters. It has no outside effects on other areas. A Federalism summary impact statement is not required. Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988) This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this rule: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Oct 12, 2012 Jkt 229001 (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal standards. Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department Policy) The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian tribes through a commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule under the Department’s consultation policy and under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that consultation under the Department’s tribal consultation policy is not required. Representatives of the five Indian tribes affiliated with SLBE were consulted during the evaluation of the trail concept and route in the preparation of the GMP/EIS. Representatives of the nearest affiliated tribe, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, are members of the LSHR that proposed the trail and helped to prepare the EA. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and a submission under the PRA is not required. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement under the NEPA is not required because we reached a FONSI. The GMP/EIS, EA, FONSI, and related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore’s planning Web site http://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/ planning.htm. Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211) This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is not required. Clarity of This Regulation We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and 12988 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a), and by the Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means that each rule we publish must: (a) Be logically organized; (b) Use the active voice to address readers directly; (c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than jargon; (d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and (e) Use lists and tables wherever possible. If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc. Drafting Information: The primary authors of this regulation were Tom Ulrich, Deputy Superintendent, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Michael Tiernan, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, A.J. North, Jay P. Calhoun, and Rose Wilkinson, NPS Regulations and Special Park Uses, Washington, DC. Public Participation It is the policy of NPS, whenever practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested parties may submit written comments, suggestions, or objections regarding this proposed rule to the addresses noted at the beginning of this rule. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7 National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below: E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM 15OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM 1. The authority for Part 7 continues to read as follows: Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued under 36 U.S.C. 501–511, D.C. Code 10–137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50– 2201 (2001). 2. In § 7.80 add paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 7.80 Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore. * * * * * (c) Bicycling. (1) The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail, approximately 27 miles in length from the southern Leelanau County line at Manning Road to County Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach, is designated as a route for bicycle use. (2) The Superintendent may open or close designated routes, or portions thereof, or impose conditions or restrictions for bicycle use after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural and cultural resource protection, and other management activities and objectives. (i) The Superintendent will provide public notice of all such actions through one or more of the methods listed in § 1.7 of this chapter. (ii) Violating a closure, condition, or restriction is prohibited. Rachel Jacobson, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks. [FR Doc. 2012–25138 Filed 10–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–HH–P ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD 36 CFR Part 1195 [Docket No. ATBCB–2012–0003] RIN 3014–AA40 Medical Diagnostic Equipment Accessibility Standards Advisory Committee Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting. AGENCY: The Medical Diagnostic Equipment Accessibility Standards Advisory Committee (Committee) will hold its second meeting. On July 5, 2012, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) established an erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Oct 12, 2012 Jkt 229001 advisory committee to make recommendations to the Board on matters associated with comments received and responses to questions included in a previously published Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on Medical Diagnostic Equipment Accessibility Standards. DATES: The Committee will meet on October 29, 2012, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on October 30, 2012, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Access Board’s Conference Room, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004–1111. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rex Pace, Office of Technical and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 1331 F Street NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004–1111. Telephone number (202) 272–0023 (Voice); (202) 272–0052 (TTY). Electronic mail address: pace@accessboard.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 5, 2012, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) established an advisory committee to make recommendations to the Board on matters associated with comments received and responses to questions included in a previously published NPRM on Medical Diagnostic Equipment Accessibility Standards. See 77 FR 6916 (February 9, 2012). The NPRM and information related to the proposed standards are available on the Access Board’s Web site at: http:// www.access-board.gov/medicalequipment.htm. The advisory committee will hold its second meeting on October 29 and 30, 2012. The agenda for the meeting includes the following: • Review of previous committee work; • Formation of subcommittees based on medical diagnostic equipment type; • Continued discussion on transfer surface height and size; • Consideration of and possible discussion on permitted obstructions to the transfer surface; • Consideration of and possible discussion on transfer support location and configuration; • Consideration of and possible discussion on issues proposed by committee members; and • Discussion of administrative issues. The preliminary meeting agenda, along with information about the committee, is available at the Access Board’s Web site (http://www.accessboard.gov/medical-equipment.htm). PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 62479 Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons can attend the meetings and communicate their views. Members of the public will have opportunities to address the committee on issues of interest to them during public comment periods scheduled on each day of the meeting. The meetings will be accessible to persons with disabilities. An assistive listening system, computer assisted realtime transcription (CART), and sign language interpreters will be provided. Persons attending the meetings are requested to refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances for the comfort of other participants (see www.access-board.gov/about/policies/ fragrance.htm for more information). Also, persons wishing to provide handouts or other written information to the committee are requested to provide electronic formats to Rex Pace via email prior to the meetings so that alternate formats can be distributed to committee members. David M. Capozzi, Executive Director. [FR Doc. 2012–25257 Filed 10–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8150–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2008–0177; FRL–9740–8] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Portion of York County, South Carolina Within Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; Reasonable Further Progress Plan Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: EPA is proposing to approve portions of two state implementation plan (SIP) revisions, submitted by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, on August 31, 2007, and April 29, 2010, to address the reasonable further progress (RFP) plan requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for the portion of York County, South Carolina that is within the bi-state Charlotte-GastoniaRock Hill 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. The CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North CarolinaSouth Carolina 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘bi-state Charlotte Area’’) is SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM 15OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62476-62479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25138]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Part 7

[NPS-SLBE-10552; 6620-SZM]
RIN 1024-AE11


Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping 
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service proposes to designate the Sleeping 
Bear Heritage Trail currently under construction within Sleeping Bear 
Dunes National Lakeshore as a route for bicycle use. The approximately 
27-mile-long trail will generally parallel major state highways and 
offer visitors safe, non-motorized access to the park. National Park 
Service general regulations require promulgation of a special 
regulation to designate routes for bicycle use outside developed areas 
or off park roads.

DATES: Comments must be received by December 14, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulation 
Identifier Number (RIN), by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail or Hand Deliver to: Superintendent's Office, Sleeping 
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 9922 Front Street, Empire, Michigan 
49630.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil Akers, Chief Ranger, Sleeping 
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 231-326-5135, or at 9922 Front Street, 
Empire, Michigan 49630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore (SLBE or Lakeshore) was 
established in 1970 ``for the benefit, inspiration, education, 
recreation, and enjoyment of the public.'' (16 U.S.C. 460x). SLBE's 
enabling legislation requires the National Park Service (NPS) to 
``administer and protect [the Lakeshore] in a manner which provides for 
recreational opportunities consistent with the maximum protection of 
the natural environment within the area.'' (16 U.S.C. 460x). The 
71,000-acre Lakeshore is located in the northwest portion of Michigan's 
Lower Peninsula and encompasses a 35-mile stretch of Lake Michigan's 
eastern coastline as well as North Manitou and South Manitou islands. 
The mainland portion is located within Benzie and Leelanau counties. 
The Manitou Islands, in Leelanau County, are located to the northwest 
in Lake Michigan, about seven miles from the shore. The nearest city is 
Traverse City, Michigan (population 15,000), located 30 miles east of 
the Lakeshore. Smaller communities such as Empire, Glen Arbor, and 
Frankfort are closer.
    Named after a complex of coastal sand dunes, the Lakeshore features 
white sand beaches, steep bluffs reaching as high as 450 feet above 
Lake Michigan, thick maple and beech forests, and clear inland lakes. 
The Lakeshore's most notable features--the ancient sand dunes--are 
products of wind, ice, and water action over thousands of years. The 
high, perched dunes afford spectacular views across Lake Michigan and 
of other glacially formed landscapes. The contrast between the open, 
sunny environment of the dunes and the adjacent lush beech-maple 
forests is striking.
    The Robert H. Manning Memorial Lighthouse, three former U.S. Life-
Saving Service/Coast Guard stations, several coastal villages, and 
picturesque farmsteads reflect the Lakeshore's rich maritime, 
agricultural, and recreational history. The region surrounding the 
Lakeshore is a popular vacation and summer home destination. SLBE 
offers visitors recreational activities such as hiking, backpacking, 
kayaking, cross-country skiing, backcountry camping, hunting, fishing, 
and boating.
    Over 1.1 million people visit the Lakeshore annually. SLBE's main 
visitor attractions include the Dune Climb (330,000+ visitors/year), 
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive (430,000 visitors/year), and the Visitor 
Center (130,000+ visitors/year). Traffic and parking congestion are a 
concern at these locations. A multi-use trail connecting the main 
visitor destinations would help relieve these traffic concerns while 
simultaneously enhancing visitor access to a variety of recreational 
activities.

History of Bicycle Use

    Currently, bicycling within SLBE is allowed only on a lane shared 
with motor vehicles on Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive and on the road 
shoulders of state highways (M-22 and M-109) and county roads than run 
through the Lakeshore.

The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail

    The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail (SBHT) will be a hard-surfaced, 
approximately 27-mile-long trail from the southern Leelanau County line 
at Manning Road to County Road 651 at

[[Page 62477]]

Good Harbor Beach. The trail will be separated from the roadway 
wherever possible, providing a safe, non-motorized route connecting the 
Lakeshore's main visitor destinations with neighboring communities in 
Glen Arbor and Empire. Construction of the first segment of the trail 
was completed in June 2012, with the remainder to be constructed over a 
period of approximately 10 years. The route will generally parallel 
state highways M-22 and M-109, but will occasionally depart from these 
rights-of-way to take advantage of other existing corridors, such as 
old logging trails and a narrow gauge railbed. By using other disturbed 
areas whenever feasible, the location of the SBHT will minimize 
disturbance to Lakeshore resources. The SBHT will be located entirely 
on public lands within the Lakeshore.
    Moving bicycle traffic off roads used by motor vehicles will reduce 
safety hazards and enhance opportunities for non-motorized enjoyment of 
the Lakeshore. It will also encourage the use of alternate means of 
transportation by park employees and park visitors to access these 
extremely popular areas. The SBHT will give bicyclists, walkers, 
runners, wheelchair users, rollerbladers, and cross-country skiers a 
safe, enjoyable, and healthy way to access and explore the Lakeshore.
    Maps depicting the planned trail route including the completed 
first segment are available for review in the office of the 
Superintendent and on the Lakeshore's Web site at http://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.

Trail Planning and Environmental Analyses

    The idea for a multi-use trail came from the Leelanau Scenic 
Heritage Route Committee (LSHR), which was created by the State of 
Michigan to preserve the historical integrity and safety of state 
highways M-22, M-109, and M-204. The LSHR is a broad partnership with 
representatives from 12 municipalities, the Lakeshore, the Michigan 
Department of Transportation, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and 
Chippewa Indians, the Leelanau Conservancy, the Leelanau County Road 
Commission, the Leelanau County Planning Commission, chambers of 
commerce, interested organizations, and citizens.
    Planning for the trail began in 2005 when the LSHR suggested the 
concept to the NPS. In 2006, the LSHR created a Trailway Work Group to 
develop a multi-use trail along the M-22 and M-109 corridor in the 
Lakeshore. The Work Group included representatives of SLBE, the 
Michigan Department of Transportation, local townships and villages, 
and other interested groups and citizens. Through the LSHR, the public 
had many opportunities for involvement in planning the SBHT. The public 
provided input and review at various meetings and activities, including 
over 25 LSHR Committee meetings and 15 Trailway Work Group meetings 
from 2005 to 2008, and Port Oneida Days at the Lakeshore in August 2006 
and 2007. In 2006 the LSHR staff also made introductory presentations 
to local governments, with follow-up presentations made in 2008.
    The multi-use trail concept, including bicycle use, and the trail 
route were considered in the preferred alternative of SLBE's October 
2008 Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental 
Impact Statement (GMP/EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) signed by the 
NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS Mid-West Regional Director in January 
2009. In March 2009, SLBE published the Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route 
Trailway Plan and Environmental Assessment (EA) which evaluated the 
environmental impacts of a no-action alterative and two action 
alternatives, including one identified as the preferred alternative.
    The Leelanau Scenic Heritage Trailway route was named the Sleeping 
Bear Heritage Trail, and in August 2009, the NPS SLBE Superintendent 
and NPS Mid-West Regional Director signed a Finding of No Significant 
Impact (FONSI). The FONSI identified the preferred alternative as the 
selected action and concluded that the construction of the multi-use 
trail, which would include bicycle use, would not have a significant 
effect on the human environment. The GMP/EIS, ROD, EA, FONSI, and 
related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore's planning Web site at 
 http://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.

Proposed Rule

    The SBHT will generally be constructed in M-22/M-109 and county 
road rights-of-way, and primarily within developed area zones as 
described in the Lakeshore's GMP. However, the trail route will 
occasionally deviate from the highway corridor and outside of developed 
areas as previously described in this rule, to provide access to 
natural, cultural, and recreation resources, and to promote a broader 
variety of experiences for the trailway user. Therefore SLBE is 
pursuing promulgation of a special regulation for bicycle use, as 
required by 36 CFR 4.30.
    Accordingly, the proposed rule would add a new paragraph to 36 CFR 
7.80, designating the proposed 27-mile-long SBHT as a route for bicycle 
use. The proposed rule also grants the Superintendent the authority to 
impose closures or restrictions upon bicycle use on designated trails 
after taking into consideration public health and safety, resource 
protection, and other management activities and objectives, provided 
public notice is given under 36 CFR 1.7.
    The NPS now seeks comments on its proposal to designate this as a 
route for bicycle use. The construction of the SBHT as a multi-use 
trail, as stated above, was a separate decision and is not at issue in 
this proposal.

Compliance With Other Laws and Executive Orders

Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)

    Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has 
determined that this rule is not significant.
    Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order 
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system 
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, 
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory 
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory 
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of 
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, 
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563 
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available 
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public 
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this 
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a 
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.). This certification is based on information contained in the 
report entitled ``Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses 
Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Trailway, Sleeping Bear Dunes National 
Lakeshore'' (NPS Environmental Quality Division--May 2012), available 
for review at http://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.

[[Page 62478]]

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)

    This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. 
This rule:
    a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
more.
    b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government 
agencies, or geographic regions.
    c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The 
rule would not require fees, or involve other measures that would 
increase costs to visitors or businesses. Rather, this rule would 
reasonably increase Lakeshore visitation and thereby generate benefits 
for businesses through increased visitor spending.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or 
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per 
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, 
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public 
use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other 
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information 
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.

Takings (Executive Order 12630)

    Under the criteria in section 2 of Executive Order 12630, this rule 
does not have significant takings implications. The rule will not deny 
any property owner beneficial uses, or reduce the value, of their land. 
No taking of property will occur as a result of this rule. A takings 
implication assessment is not required.

Federalism (Executive Order 13132)

    Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule 
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This proposed 
rule only affects use of NPS administered lands and waters. It has no 
outside effects on other areas. A Federalism summary impact statement 
is not required.

Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)

    This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. 
Specifically, this rule:
    (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all 
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be 
written to minimize litigation; and
    (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all 
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal 
standards.

Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department 
Policy)

    The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its 
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a 
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their 
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this 
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria 
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial 
direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that 
consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not 
required.
    Representatives of the five Indian tribes affiliated with SLBE were 
consulted during the evaluation of the trail concept and route in the 
preparation of the GMP/EIS. Representatives of the nearest affiliated 
tribe, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, are 
members of the LSHR that proposed the trail and helped to prepare the 
EA.

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and 
a submission under the PRA is not required.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement 
under the NEPA is not required because we reached a FONSI. The GMP/EIS, 
EA, FONSI, and related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore's 
planning Web site http://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.

Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)

    This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition 
in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is not 
required.

Clarity of This Regulation

    We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and 
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a), and by the 
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain 
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
    (a) Be logically organized;
    (b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
    (c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than 
jargon;
    (d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
    (e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
    If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us 
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To 
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as 
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections 
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are 
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, 
etc.
    Drafting Information: The primary authors of this regulation were 
Tom Ulrich, Deputy Superintendent, Sleeping Bear Dunes National 
Lakeshore, Michael Tiernan, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Washington, DC, A.J. North, Jay P. Calhoun, and Rose 
Wilkinson, NPS Regulations and Special Park Uses, Washington, DC.

Public Participation

    It is the policy of NPS, whenever practicable, to afford the public 
an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process. Accordingly, 
interested parties may submit written comments, suggestions, or 
objections regarding this proposed rule to the addresses noted at the 
beginning of this rule.

Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7

    National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service 
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below:

[[Page 62479]]

PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM

    1. The authority for Part 7 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued 
under 36 U.S.C. 501-511, D.C. Code 10-137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50-
2201 (2001).

    2. In Sec.  7.80 add paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  7.80  Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.

* * * * *
    (c) Bicycling. (1) The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail, approximately 
27 miles in length from the southern Leelanau County line at Manning 
Road to County Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach, is designated as a route 
for bicycle use.
    (2) The Superintendent may open or close designated routes, or 
portions thereof, or impose conditions or restrictions for bicycle use 
after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural and 
cultural resource protection, and other management activities and 
objectives.
    (i) The Superintendent will provide public notice of all such 
actions through one or more of the methods listed in Sec.  1.7 of this 
chapter.
    (ii) Violating a closure, condition, or restriction is prohibited.

Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012-25138 Filed 10-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HH-P