Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling, 62476-62479 [2012-25138]
Download as PDF
62476
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
AGENCY:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Amend § 165.1319 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 165.1319 Safety Zone Regulations;
Seafair Blue Angels Air Show Performance,
Seattle, WA.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
*
*
*
*
(b) Location. The following is a safety
zone: All waters of Lake Washington
encompassed by the following points:
47°36′17.28″ N, 122°14′49.44″ W; thence
west to point 47°36′17.28″ N,
122°16′58.56″ W; thence south along the
shoreline to Andrews Bay at point
47°33′04.62″ N, 122°15′32.46″ W; thence
northeast along the shoreline of Bailey
Peninsula to its northeast point at
47°33′44.98″ N, 122°15′03.48″ W; thence
easterly to point 47°33′43.98″ N,
122°13′51.36″ W on Mercer Island;
thence northerly along the shore of
Mercer Island to point 47°35′45.12″ N,
122°14′49.44″ W; thence north back to
the point of origin.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–25237 Filed 10–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 12, 2012
Jkt 229001
[NPS–SLBE–10552; 6620–SZM]
RIN 1024–AE11
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System, Sleeping Bear
Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed rule.
The National Park Service
proposes to designate the Sleeping Bear
Heritage Trail currently under
construction within Sleeping Bear
Dunes National Lakeshore as a route for
bicycle use. The approximately 27-milelong trail will generally parallel major
state highways and offer visitors safe,
non-motorized access to the park.
National Park Service general
regulations require promulgation of a
special regulation to designate routes for
bicycle use outside developed areas or
off park roads.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN), by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or Hand Deliver to:
Superintendent’s Office, Sleeping Bear
Dunes National Lakeshore, 9922 Front
Street, Empire, Michigan 49630.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil
Akers, Chief Ranger, Sleeping Bear
Dunes National Lakeshore, 231–326–
5135, or at 9922 Front Street, Empire,
Michigan 49630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165, as follows:
Dated: September 25, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
36 CFR Part 7
ACTION:
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
*
National Park Service
Background
Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore (SLBE or Lakeshore) was
established in 1970 ‘‘for the benefit,
inspiration, education, recreation, and
enjoyment of the public.’’ (16 U.S.C.
460x). SLBE’s enabling legislation
requires the National Park Service (NPS)
to ‘‘administer and protect [the
Lakeshore] in a manner which provides
for recreational opportunities consistent
with the maximum protection of the
natural environment within the area.’’
(16 U.S.C. 460x). The 71,000-acre
Lakeshore is located in the northwest
portion of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula
and encompasses a 35-mile stretch of
Lake Michigan’s eastern coastline as
well as North Manitou and South
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Manitou islands. The mainland portion
is located within Benzie and Leelanau
counties. The Manitou Islands, in
Leelanau County, are located to the
northwest in Lake Michigan, about
seven miles from the shore. The nearest
city is Traverse City, Michigan
(population 15,000), located 30 miles
east of the Lakeshore. Smaller
communities such as Empire, Glen
Arbor, and Frankfort are closer.
Named after a complex of coastal sand
dunes, the Lakeshore features white
sand beaches, steep bluffs reaching as
high as 450 feet above Lake Michigan,
thick maple and beech forests, and clear
inland lakes. The Lakeshore’s most
notable features—the ancient sand
dunes—are products of wind, ice, and
water action over thousands of years.
The high, perched dunes afford
spectacular views across Lake Michigan
and of other glacially formed
landscapes. The contrast between the
open, sunny environment of the dunes
and the adjacent lush beech-maple
forests is striking.
The Robert H. Manning Memorial
Lighthouse, three former U.S. LifeSaving Service/Coast Guard stations,
several coastal villages, and picturesque
farmsteads reflect the Lakeshore’s rich
maritime, agricultural, and recreational
history. The region surrounding the
Lakeshore is a popular vacation and
summer home destination. SLBE offers
visitors recreational activities such as
hiking, backpacking, kayaking, crosscountry skiing, backcountry camping,
hunting, fishing, and boating.
Over 1.1 million people visit the
Lakeshore annually. SLBE’s main visitor
attractions include the Dune Climb
(330,000+ visitors/year), Pierce Stocking
Scenic Drive (430,000 visitors/year), and
the Visitor Center (130,000+ visitors/
year). Traffic and parking congestion are
a concern at these locations. A multi-use
trail connecting the main visitor
destinations would help relieve these
traffic concerns while simultaneously
enhancing visitor access to a variety of
recreational activities.
History of Bicycle Use
Currently, bicycling within SLBE is
allowed only on a lane shared with
motor vehicles on Pierce Stocking
Scenic Drive and on the road shoulders
of state highways (M–22 and M–109)
and county roads than run through the
Lakeshore.
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
(SBHT) will be a hard-surfaced,
approximately 27-mile-long trail from
the southern Leelanau County line at
Manning Road to County Road 651 at
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Good Harbor Beach. The trail will be
separated from the roadway wherever
possible, providing a safe, nonmotorized route connecting the
Lakeshore’s main visitor destinations
with neighboring communities in Glen
Arbor and Empire. Construction of the
first segment of the trail was completed
in June 2012, with the remainder to be
constructed over a period of
approximately 10 years. The route will
generally parallel state highways M–22
and M–109, but will occasionally depart
from these rights-of-way to take
advantage of other existing corridors,
such as old logging trails and a narrow
gauge railbed. By using other disturbed
areas whenever feasible, the location of
the SBHT will minimize disturbance to
Lakeshore resources. The SBHT will be
located entirely on public lands within
the Lakeshore.
Moving bicycle traffic off roads used
by motor vehicles will reduce safety
hazards and enhance opportunities for
non-motorized enjoyment of the
Lakeshore. It will also encourage the use
of alternate means of transportation by
park employees and park visitors to
access these extremely popular areas.
The SBHT will give bicyclists, walkers,
runners, wheelchair users, rollerbladers,
and cross-country skiers a safe,
enjoyable, and healthy way to access
and explore the Lakeshore.
Maps depicting the planned trail
route including the completed first
segment are available for review in the
office of the Superintendent and on the
Lakeshore’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Trail Planning and Environmental
Analyses
The idea for a multi-use trail came
from the Leelanau Scenic Heritage
Route Committee (LSHR), which was
created by the State of Michigan to
preserve the historical integrity and
safety of state highways M–22, M–109,
and M–204. The LSHR is a broad
partnership with representatives from
12 municipalities, the Lakeshore, the
Michigan Department of Transportation,
the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and
Chippewa Indians, the Leelanau
Conservancy, the Leelanau County Road
Commission, the Leelanau County
Planning Commission, chambers of
commerce, interested organizations, and
citizens.
Planning for the trail began in 2005
when the LSHR suggested the concept
to the NPS. In 2006, the LSHR created
a Trailway Work Group to develop a
multi-use trail along the M–22 and M–
109 corridor in the Lakeshore. The Work
Group included representatives of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 12, 2012
Jkt 229001
SLBE, the Michigan Department of
Transportation, local townships and
villages, and other interested groups and
citizens. Through the LSHR, the public
had many opportunities for involvement
in planning the SBHT. The public
provided input and review at various
meetings and activities, including over
25 LSHR Committee meetings and 15
Trailway Work Group meetings from
2005 to 2008, and Port Oneida Days at
the Lakeshore in August 2006 and 2007.
In 2006 the LSHR staff also made
introductory presentations to local
governments, with follow-up
presentations made in 2008.
The multi-use trail concept, including
bicycle use, and the trail route were
considered in the preferred alternative
of SLBE’s October 2008 Final General
Management Plan/Wilderness Study/
Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/
EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD)
signed by the NPS SLBE Superintendent
and NPS Mid-West Regional Director in
January 2009. In March 2009, SLBE
published the Leelanau Scenic Heritage
Route Trailway Plan and Environmental
Assessment (EA) which evaluated the
environmental impacts of a no-action
alterative and two action alternatives,
including one identified as the preferred
alternative.
The Leelanau Scenic Heritage
Trailway route was named the Sleeping
Bear Heritage Trail, and in August 2009,
the NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS
Mid-West Regional Director signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI). The FONSI identified the
preferred alternative as the selected
action and concluded that the
construction of the multi-use trail,
which would include bicycle use,
would not have a significant effect on
the human environment. The GMP/EIS,
ROD, EA, FONSI, and related
documents may be viewed on the
Lakeshore’s planning Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Proposed Rule
The SBHT will generally be
constructed in M–22/M–109 and county
road rights-of-way, and primarily within
developed area zones as described in
the Lakeshore’s GMP. However, the trail
route will occasionally deviate from the
highway corridor and outside of
developed areas as previously described
in this rule, to provide access to natural,
cultural, and recreation resources, and
to promote a broader variety of
experiences for the trailway user.
Therefore SLBE is pursuing
promulgation of a special regulation for
bicycle use, as required by 36 CFR 4.30.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62477
Accordingly, the proposed rule would
add a new paragraph to 36 CFR 7.80,
designating the proposed 27-mile-long
SBHT as a route for bicycle use. The
proposed rule also grants the
Superintendent the authority to impose
closures or restrictions upon bicycle use
on designated trails after taking into
consideration public health and safety,
resource protection, and other
management activities and objectives,
provided public notice is given under
36 CFR 1.7.
The NPS now seeks comments on its
proposal to designate this as a route for
bicycle use. The construction of the
SBHT as a multi-use trail, as stated
above, was a separate decision and is
not at issue in this proposal.
Compliance With Other Laws and
Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. OIRA has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is
based on information contained in the
report entitled ‘‘Cost-Benefit and
Regulatory Flexibility Analyses
Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route
Trailway, Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore’’ (NPS Environmental Quality
Division—May 2012), available for
review at https://www.nps.gov/slbe/
parkmgmt/planning.htm.
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
62478
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The rule would not require fees, or
involve other measures that would
increase costs to visitors or businesses.
Rather, this rule would reasonably
increase Lakeshore visitation and
thereby generate benefits for businesses
through increased visitor spending.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
addresses public use of national park
lands, and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments. A
statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of
Executive Order 12630, this rule does
not have significant takings
implications. The rule will not deny any
property owner beneficial uses, or
reduce the value, of their land. No
taking of property will occur as a result
of this rule. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, the rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. This proposed rule only
affects use of NPS administered lands
and waters. It has no outside effects on
other areas. A Federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 12, 2012
Jkt 229001
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it has
no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
tribal consultation policy is not
required.
Representatives of the five Indian
tribes affiliated with SLBE were
consulted during the evaluation of the
trail concept and route in the
preparation of the GMP/EIS.
Representatives of the nearest affiliated
tribe, the Grand Traverse Band of
Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, are
members of the LSHR that proposed the
trail and helped to prepare the EA.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission under the PRA is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the NEPA is
not required because we reached a
FONSI. The GMP/EIS, EA, FONSI, and
related documents may be viewed on
the Lakeshore’s planning Web site
https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and 12988
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section
1(a), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Drafting Information: The primary
authors of this regulation were Tom
Ulrich, Deputy Superintendent,
Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore, Michael Tiernan, Office of
the Solicitor, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Washington, DC, A.J. North, Jay
P. Calhoun, and Rose Wilkinson, NPS
Regulations and Special Park Uses,
Washington, DC.
Public Participation
It is the policy of NPS, whenever
practicable, to afford the public an
opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly,
interested parties may submit written
comments, suggestions, or objections
regarding this proposed rule to the
addresses noted at the beginning of this
rule.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below:
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2012 / Proposed Rules
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority for Part 7 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec.
7.96 also issued under 36 U.S.C. 501–511,
D.C. Code 10–137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50–
2201 (2001).
2. In § 7.80 add paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
§ 7.80 Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Bicycling. (1) The Sleeping Bear
Heritage Trail, approximately 27 miles
in length from the southern Leelanau
County line at Manning Road to County
Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach, is
designated as a route for bicycle use.
(2) The Superintendent may open or
close designated routes, or portions
thereof, or impose conditions or
restrictions for bicycle use after taking
into consideration public health and
safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management
activities and objectives.
(i) The Superintendent will provide
public notice of all such actions through
one or more of the methods listed in
§ 1.7 of this chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or
restriction is prohibited.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012–25138 Filed 10–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HH–P
ARCHITECTURAL AND
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS
COMPLIANCE BOARD
36 CFR Part 1195
[Docket No. ATBCB–2012–0003]
RIN 3014–AA40
Medical Diagnostic Equipment
Accessibility Standards Advisory
Committee
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board.
ACTION: Notice of advisory committee
meeting.
AGENCY:
The Medical Diagnostic
Equipment Accessibility Standards
Advisory Committee (Committee) will
hold its second meeting. On July 5,
2012, the Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) established an
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 12, 2012
Jkt 229001
advisory committee to make
recommendations to the Board on
matters associated with comments
received and responses to questions
included in a previously published
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
on Medical Diagnostic Equipment
Accessibility Standards.
DATES: The Committee will meet on
October 29, 2012, from 10:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. and on October 30, 2012, from
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Access Board’s Conference Room,
1331 F Street NW., Suite 800,
Washington, DC 20004–1111.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rex
Pace, Office of Technical and
Information Services, Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board, 1331 F Street NW., suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20004–1111.
Telephone number (202) 272–0023
(Voice); (202) 272–0052 (TTY).
Electronic mail address: pace@accessboard.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 5,
2012, the Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) established an
advisory committee to make
recommendations to the Board on
matters associated with comments
received and responses to questions
included in a previously published
NPRM on Medical Diagnostic
Equipment Accessibility Standards. See
77 FR 6916 (February 9, 2012). The
NPRM and information related to the
proposed standards are available on the
Access Board’s Web site at: https://
www.access-board.gov/medicalequipment.htm.
The advisory committee will hold its
second meeting on October 29 and 30,
2012. The agenda for the meeting
includes the following:
• Review of previous committee
work;
• Formation of subcommittees based
on medical diagnostic equipment type;
• Continued discussion on transfer
surface height and size;
• Consideration of and possible
discussion on permitted obstructions to
the transfer surface;
• Consideration of and possible
discussion on transfer support location
and configuration;
• Consideration of and possible
discussion on issues proposed by
committee members; and
• Discussion of administrative issues.
The preliminary meeting agenda,
along with information about the
committee, is available at the Access
Board’s Web site (https://www.accessboard.gov/medical-equipment.htm).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62479
Committee meetings are open to the
public and interested persons can attend
the meetings and communicate their
views. Members of the public will have
opportunities to address the committee
on issues of interest to them during
public comment periods scheduled on
each day of the meeting.
The meetings will be accessible to
persons with disabilities. An assistive
listening system, computer assisted realtime transcription (CART), and sign
language interpreters will be provided.
Persons attending the meetings are
requested to refrain from using perfume,
cologne, and other fragrances for the
comfort of other participants (see
www.access-board.gov/about/policies/
fragrance.htm for more information).
Also, persons wishing to provide
handouts or other written information to
the committee are requested to provide
electronic formats to Rex Pace via email
prior to the meetings so that alternate
formats can be distributed to committee
members.
David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012–25257 Filed 10–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2008–0177; FRL–9740–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Portion of York
County, South Carolina Within
Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North
Carolina-South Carolina 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Nonattainment Area;
Reasonable Further Progress Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
portions of two state implementation
plan (SIP) revisions, submitted by the
South Carolina Department of Health
and Environmental Control, on August
31, 2007, and April 29, 2010, to address
the reasonable further progress (RFP)
plan requirements for the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for the portion of
York County, South Carolina that is
within the bi-state Charlotte-GastoniaRock Hill 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. The CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North CarolinaSouth Carolina 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as the ‘‘bi-state Charlotte Area’’) is
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM
15OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62476-62479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25138]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS-SLBE-10552; 6620-SZM]
RIN 1024-AE11
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Sleeping
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Bicycling
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service proposes to designate the Sleeping
Bear Heritage Trail currently under construction within Sleeping Bear
Dunes National Lakeshore as a route for bicycle use. The approximately
27-mile-long trail will generally parallel major state highways and
offer visitors safe, non-motorized access to the park. National Park
Service general regulations require promulgation of a special
regulation to designate routes for bicycle use outside developed areas
or off park roads.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN), by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or Hand Deliver to: Superintendent's Office, Sleeping
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 9922 Front Street, Empire, Michigan
49630.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil Akers, Chief Ranger, Sleeping
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 231-326-5135, or at 9922 Front Street,
Empire, Michigan 49630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore (SLBE or Lakeshore) was
established in 1970 ``for the benefit, inspiration, education,
recreation, and enjoyment of the public.'' (16 U.S.C. 460x). SLBE's
enabling legislation requires the National Park Service (NPS) to
``administer and protect [the Lakeshore] in a manner which provides for
recreational opportunities consistent with the maximum protection of
the natural environment within the area.'' (16 U.S.C. 460x). The
71,000-acre Lakeshore is located in the northwest portion of Michigan's
Lower Peninsula and encompasses a 35-mile stretch of Lake Michigan's
eastern coastline as well as North Manitou and South Manitou islands.
The mainland portion is located within Benzie and Leelanau counties.
The Manitou Islands, in Leelanau County, are located to the northwest
in Lake Michigan, about seven miles from the shore. The nearest city is
Traverse City, Michigan (population 15,000), located 30 miles east of
the Lakeshore. Smaller communities such as Empire, Glen Arbor, and
Frankfort are closer.
Named after a complex of coastal sand dunes, the Lakeshore features
white sand beaches, steep bluffs reaching as high as 450 feet above
Lake Michigan, thick maple and beech forests, and clear inland lakes.
The Lakeshore's most notable features--the ancient sand dunes--are
products of wind, ice, and water action over thousands of years. The
high, perched dunes afford spectacular views across Lake Michigan and
of other glacially formed landscapes. The contrast between the open,
sunny environment of the dunes and the adjacent lush beech-maple
forests is striking.
The Robert H. Manning Memorial Lighthouse, three former U.S. Life-
Saving Service/Coast Guard stations, several coastal villages, and
picturesque farmsteads reflect the Lakeshore's rich maritime,
agricultural, and recreational history. The region surrounding the
Lakeshore is a popular vacation and summer home destination. SLBE
offers visitors recreational activities such as hiking, backpacking,
kayaking, cross-country skiing, backcountry camping, hunting, fishing,
and boating.
Over 1.1 million people visit the Lakeshore annually. SLBE's main
visitor attractions include the Dune Climb (330,000+ visitors/year),
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive (430,000 visitors/year), and the Visitor
Center (130,000+ visitors/year). Traffic and parking congestion are a
concern at these locations. A multi-use trail connecting the main
visitor destinations would help relieve these traffic concerns while
simultaneously enhancing visitor access to a variety of recreational
activities.
History of Bicycle Use
Currently, bicycling within SLBE is allowed only on a lane shared
with motor vehicles on Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive and on the road
shoulders of state highways (M-22 and M-109) and county roads than run
through the Lakeshore.
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail
The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail (SBHT) will be a hard-surfaced,
approximately 27-mile-long trail from the southern Leelanau County line
at Manning Road to County Road 651 at
[[Page 62477]]
Good Harbor Beach. The trail will be separated from the roadway
wherever possible, providing a safe, non-motorized route connecting the
Lakeshore's main visitor destinations with neighboring communities in
Glen Arbor and Empire. Construction of the first segment of the trail
was completed in June 2012, with the remainder to be constructed over a
period of approximately 10 years. The route will generally parallel
state highways M-22 and M-109, but will occasionally depart from these
rights-of-way to take advantage of other existing corridors, such as
old logging trails and a narrow gauge railbed. By using other disturbed
areas whenever feasible, the location of the SBHT will minimize
disturbance to Lakeshore resources. The SBHT will be located entirely
on public lands within the Lakeshore.
Moving bicycle traffic off roads used by motor vehicles will reduce
safety hazards and enhance opportunities for non-motorized enjoyment of
the Lakeshore. It will also encourage the use of alternate means of
transportation by park employees and park visitors to access these
extremely popular areas. The SBHT will give bicyclists, walkers,
runners, wheelchair users, rollerbladers, and cross-country skiers a
safe, enjoyable, and healthy way to access and explore the Lakeshore.
Maps depicting the planned trail route including the completed
first segment are available for review in the office of the
Superintendent and on the Lakeshore's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Trail Planning and Environmental Analyses
The idea for a multi-use trail came from the Leelanau Scenic
Heritage Route Committee (LSHR), which was created by the State of
Michigan to preserve the historical integrity and safety of state
highways M-22, M-109, and M-204. The LSHR is a broad partnership with
representatives from 12 municipalities, the Lakeshore, the Michigan
Department of Transportation, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and
Chippewa Indians, the Leelanau Conservancy, the Leelanau County Road
Commission, the Leelanau County Planning Commission, chambers of
commerce, interested organizations, and citizens.
Planning for the trail began in 2005 when the LSHR suggested the
concept to the NPS. In 2006, the LSHR created a Trailway Work Group to
develop a multi-use trail along the M-22 and M-109 corridor in the
Lakeshore. The Work Group included representatives of SLBE, the
Michigan Department of Transportation, local townships and villages,
and other interested groups and citizens. Through the LSHR, the public
had many opportunities for involvement in planning the SBHT. The public
provided input and review at various meetings and activities, including
over 25 LSHR Committee meetings and 15 Trailway Work Group meetings
from 2005 to 2008, and Port Oneida Days at the Lakeshore in August 2006
and 2007. In 2006 the LSHR staff also made introductory presentations
to local governments, with follow-up presentations made in 2008.
The multi-use trail concept, including bicycle use, and the trail
route were considered in the preferred alternative of SLBE's October
2008 Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental
Impact Statement (GMP/EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) signed by the
NPS SLBE Superintendent and NPS Mid-West Regional Director in January
2009. In March 2009, SLBE published the Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route
Trailway Plan and Environmental Assessment (EA) which evaluated the
environmental impacts of a no-action alterative and two action
alternatives, including one identified as the preferred alternative.
The Leelanau Scenic Heritage Trailway route was named the Sleeping
Bear Heritage Trail, and in August 2009, the NPS SLBE Superintendent
and NPS Mid-West Regional Director signed a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI). The FONSI identified the preferred alternative as the
selected action and concluded that the construction of the multi-use
trail, which would include bicycle use, would not have a significant
effect on the human environment. The GMP/EIS, ROD, EA, FONSI, and
related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore's planning Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Proposed Rule
The SBHT will generally be constructed in M-22/M-109 and county
road rights-of-way, and primarily within developed area zones as
described in the Lakeshore's GMP. However, the trail route will
occasionally deviate from the highway corridor and outside of developed
areas as previously described in this rule, to provide access to
natural, cultural, and recreation resources, and to promote a broader
variety of experiences for the trailway user. Therefore SLBE is
pursuing promulgation of a special regulation for bicycle use, as
required by 36 CFR 4.30.
Accordingly, the proposed rule would add a new paragraph to 36 CFR
7.80, designating the proposed 27-mile-long SBHT as a route for bicycle
use. The proposed rule also grants the Superintendent the authority to
impose closures or restrictions upon bicycle use on designated trails
after taking into consideration public health and safety, resource
protection, and other management activities and objectives, provided
public notice is given under 36 CFR 1.7.
The NPS now seeks comments on its proposal to designate this as a
route for bicycle use. The construction of the SBHT as a multi-use
trail, as stated above, was a separate decision and is not at issue in
this proposal.
Compliance With Other Laws and Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). This certification is based on information contained in the
report entitled ``Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses
Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Trailway, Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore'' (NPS Environmental Quality Division--May 2012), available
for review at https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
[[Page 62478]]
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The
rule would not require fees, or involve other measures that would
increase costs to visitors or businesses. Rather, this rule would
reasonably increase Lakeshore visitation and thereby generate benefits
for businesses through increased visitor spending.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public
use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of Executive Order 12630, this rule
does not have significant takings implications. The rule will not deny
any property owner beneficial uses, or reduce the value, of their land.
No taking of property will occur as a result of this rule. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This proposed
rule only affects use of NPS administered lands and waters. It has no
outside effects on other areas. A Federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not
required.
Representatives of the five Indian tribes affiliated with SLBE were
consulted during the evaluation of the trail concept and route in the
preparation of the GMP/EIS. Representatives of the nearest affiliated
tribe, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, are
members of the LSHR that proposed the trail and helped to prepare the
EA.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission under the PRA is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the NEPA is not required because we reached a FONSI. The GMP/EIS,
EA, FONSI, and related documents may be viewed on the Lakeshore's
planning Web site https://www.nps.gov/slbe/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
Drafting Information: The primary authors of this regulation were
Tom Ulrich, Deputy Superintendent, Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore, Michael Tiernan, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of
the Interior, Washington, DC, A.J. North, Jay P. Calhoun, and Rose
Wilkinson, NPS Regulations and Special Park Uses, Washington, DC.
Public Participation
It is the policy of NPS, whenever practicable, to afford the public
an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process. Accordingly,
interested parties may submit written comments, suggestions, or
objections regarding this proposed rule to the addresses noted at the
beginning of this rule.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below:
[[Page 62479]]
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
1. The authority for Part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued
under 36 U.S.C. 501-511, D.C. Code 10-137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50-
2201 (2001).
2. In Sec. 7.80 add paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.80 Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.
* * * * *
(c) Bicycling. (1) The Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail, approximately
27 miles in length from the southern Leelanau County line at Manning
Road to County Road 651 at Good Harbor Beach, is designated as a route
for bicycle use.
(2) The Superintendent may open or close designated routes, or
portions thereof, or impose conditions or restrictions for bicycle use
after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural and
cultural resource protection, and other management activities and
objectives.
(i) The Superintendent will provide public notice of all such
actions through one or more of the methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this
chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or restriction is prohibited.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012-25138 Filed 10-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HH-P