Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Herring River Restoration Project, Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts, 62257-62258 [2012-24888]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
would have an 18- to 24-month
construction phase, 44 years of mining
and ore processing, 30 years of
reclamation, and 5 years of monitoring.
Approximately 400 potential jobs would
be provided in the area for this
timeframe with a peak employment of
615 personnel during construction
activities. The project is consistent with
the Shoshone-Eureka Resource Area
Management Plan and does not impact
any areas with special designations.
The Partial Backfill Alternative would
be essentially similar to the Proposed
Action except that the open pit would
be partially backfilled at the end of
mining to eliminate the potential for a
pit lake to form.
The Off-Site Transfer of Ore
Concentrate for Processing Alternative
would also be similar to the Proposed
Action except that the ore processing
facilities would include only milling
operations and production of the
molybdenum sulfide concentrate.
The Slower, Longer Project
Alternative would have the same
components as the Proposed Action, but
operations would be conducted at
approximately one-half the production
rate of the Proposed Action, which
would result in a project that would last
approximately twice as long. The BLM
analyzed this alternative in detail based
on a request from Eureka County, a
Cooperating Agency on the EIS.
Mitigation measures have been
identified for multiple resources under
each alternative to minimize potential
environmental impacts and to assure
that the proposed project would not
result in undue or unnecessary
degradation of public lands. Eight
additional alternatives were considered
and rationale for their elimination from
detailed analysis is discussed. These
alternatives include (1) Complete
Backfilling Alternative, (2) Different
Waste Rock Disposal Facility Heights
Alternative, (3) Increased Ore
Processing to Match the Mining
Schedule Alternative, (4) Decreased
Mining to Match the Ore Processing
Schedule Alternative, (5) Reduced
Project Alternative, (6) Different Facility
Locations within the Project Area
Alternative, (7) Different Powerline
Alternative, and (8) Different Potentially
Acid Generating Waste Rock
Management Alternative. Based on the
analysis in the Final EIS, the BLM has
determined that the Preferred
Alternative is the Proposed Action, with
accompanying mitigation measures.
On March 2, 2007, a Notice of Intent
to Prepare an EIS was published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 9579) inviting
scoping comments on the proposed
action. Public scoping meetings for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
project were held on March 27 and 28,
2007 in Eureka and Battle Mountain,
Nevada. Six written comments were
received via mail and/or email during
the scoping period and three additional
letters were received after the closure of
the formal scoping period. All
comments that were received have been
incorporated in a Scoping Summary
Report and were considered in the
preparation of this Final EIS. On
December 2, 2011 a Notice of
Availability of the Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register (76
FR 75554) on the Draft EIS to the public
for a 90-day comment period. Two
public comment meetings were held on
January 18 and 19, 2012 in Eureka and
Crescent Valley, Nevada.
More than 1,900 comments were
received from 941 separate parties.
Comments primarily pertained to
potential impacts from the groundwater
drawdown, socioeconomic impacts to
the local communities, and impacts to
wildlife and other natural resources. All
of these comments were considered and
are addressed in Appendix H of the
Final EIS. Some additional analysis and
clarifying text was included in the Final
EIS as a result of the comments.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10.
Christopher J. Cook,
Mount Lewis Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 2012–25182 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NER–CACO–10593: 2310–0081–422]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Herring River Restoration
Project, Cape Cod National Seashore,
Massachusetts
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for the Herring River Restoration
Project in Cape Cod National Seashore,
Massachusetts. The DEIS provides a
systematic analysis of alternative
approaches to restore the Herring River
estuary to a more productive and
natural condition after a century of
diking and draining.
DATES: The NPS will accept comments
on the DEIS from the public for 60 days
after the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency notices the
availability of the DEIS in its regular
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62257
Friday Federal Register listing. A public
meeting will be held during the review
period to facilitate the submission of
public comment. Once scheduled, the
meeting date will be announced via the
Cape Cod National Seashore Web site
(https://www.nps.gov/caco/), the NPS’s
Planning Environment and Public
Comment (PEPC) Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/herring_river),
and a press release to area media.
ADDRESSES: The DEIS for the Herring
River Restoration Project will be
available for public review online at the
NPS’s PEPC Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/herring_river).
You may submit your comments by any
one of several methods. The preferred
method of comment is via the internet
at (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/
herring_river). You may also mail
comments to Herring River Restoration
Plan, Cape Cod National Seashore, 99
Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA
02667. Finally, you may hand-deliver
comments to Cape Cod National
Seashore, 99 Marconi Site Road,
Wellfleet, MA 02667.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George E. Price, Jr., Superintendent,
Cape Cod National Seashore, 99
Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA
02267; telephone (508) 771–2144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Herring River Restoration Project is a
joint project of the Cape Cod National
Seashore, the Town of Wellfleet, and the
Town of Truro, Massachusetts Division
of Ecological Restoration, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and
the Natural Resource Conservation
Service.
The Herring River is the largest
estuary on outer Cape Cod,
encompassing more than 1,100 acres of
degraded wetlands in a complicated
network of five valleys: The Herring
River, Mill Creek, Pole Dike Creek,
Bound Brook, and Duck Harbor. The
Chequessett Neck Road dike was built
in 1908 at the mouth of the Herring
River to restrict natural tidal flows.
Ditches were constructed to drain the
normally saturated flood plain soil. The
once extensive salt marshes have been
transformed into stands of invasive
plants, shrubby thickets, and forests.
The old salt marsh peat, deprived of the
tides, has decomposed and compressed,
sinking the surface of the flood plain as
much as three feet. The decomposition
of peat has released sulfuric acid that
kills fish and other aquatic life, and low
summertime dissolved oxygen has also
harmed aquatic life.
The DEIS analyzes three action
alternatives and the no action
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62258
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
alternative, as described below:
Alternative A would leave in place the
current tide control structure at
Chequessett Neck Road and continue
management of the estuary without
restoration.
Alternative B would employ an
adaptive management strategy to restore
tides in the lower reach of the Herring
River up to a maximum high tide of
approximately six feet. At this tide level
flood mitigation of sensitive properties
can be achieved without a secondary
dike at Mill Creek.
Alternative C would employ an
adaptive management strategy to restore
tides up to the maximum Chequessett
Neck Road dike capacity (10 foot
vertical tide gate opening) with a new
dike at Mill Creek that blocks all tidal
influence. This alternative would
maximize restoration in all sub-basins
except Mill Creek. Mill Creek would
remain unrestored, but no new flood
proofing measures would be needed in
Mill Creek.
Alternative D would employ an
adaptive management strategy to restore
tides up to the maximum Chequessett
Neck Road dike capacity (10 foot
vertical tide gate opening) with a new
dike at Mill Creek. Mill Creek tides
would be controlled by this secondary
structure to the same level as that of
Alternative B, the maximum level that
can be achieved after flood proofing
several low-lying properties. Tidal
restoration would be maximized in all
other sub-basins.
For Alternatives B and D, two options
are considered for mitigating project
impacts to the Chequessett Yacht &
Country Club (CYCC) golf course, a
private golf course in Mill Creek: (1)
Raise low-lying fairways a minimum of
two feet above proposed inundation
levels, or (2) relocate low-lying fairways
to an undeveloped upland area owned
by CYCC.
Alternative D, with the option to raise
existing low-lying fairways a minimum
of two feet above proposed inundation
levels, has been identified as the NPS
Preferred Alternative. This alternative
best fulfills the restoration objectives of
the project while mitigating adverse
impacts to developed properties.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
Dated: August 8, 2012.
Michael A. Caldwell,
Acting Regional Director, National Park
Service, Northeast Region.
Dated: September 25, 2012.
Jeffrey P. Reinbold,
Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.
[FR Doc. 2012–24888 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[FR Doc. 2012–25098 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
National Park Service
[NPS–NERO–FLNI–11426; 4140–SZD]
Notice of November 3, 2012, Meeting
for Flight 93 National Memorial
Advisory Commission
National Park Service, Interior.
Meeting notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice sets forth the date
of the November 3, 2012, meeting of the
Flight 93 Advisory Commission.
DATES: The public meeting of the
Advisory Commission will be held on
Saturday, November 3, 2012, at 10:00
a.m. (Eastern).
Location: The meeting will be held at
the Flight 93 National Memorial Office,
109 West Main Street, Suite 104,
Somerset, PA 15501.
Agenda:
The November 3, 2012, Commission
meeting will consist of the following:
1. Opening of Meeting, Review and
Approval of Commission Minutes
2. Reports
3. Old Business
4. New Business
5. Public Comments
6. Closing Remarks
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Further information concerning this
meeting may be obtained from the
Superintendent, Flight 93 National
Memorial, P. O. Box 911, Shanksville,
PA 15560, telephone (814) 893–6322.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. Interested
persons may make oral/written
presentations to the Commission or file
written statements. Such requests
should be made to the Superintendent
at least seven days prior to the meeting.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice To Reopen and Extend the
Scoping Comment Period for the
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Four Corners Power Plant and
Navajo Mine Energy Project
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Reopening and extension of the
scoping comment period.
AGENCY:
We are allowing additional
time for the public to submit comments
on significant issues and alternatives
that we should consider in the planning
and preparation of an environmental
impact statement (EIS) for the Four
Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine
Energy Project. We are extending the
end of the scoping comment period
from September 17, 2012 to November
1, 2012.
DATES: To ensure consideration in
developing the draft EIS, we must
receive your electronic or written
comments by the close of the scoping
period on November 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted in writing or by email. At the
top of your letter or in the subject line
of your email message, please indicate
that the comments are ‘‘Four CornersNavajo Mine EIS Comments.’’
• Email comments should be sent to:
fcppnavajoenergyeis@osmre.gov.
• Mail/Hand-Delivery/Courier:
Written comments should be sent to:
Marcelo Calle, OSM Western Region,
1999 Broadway, Suite 3320, Denver,
Colorado 80202–3050.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about the Project
and/or to have your name added to the
mailing list, contact: Marcelo Calle,
OSM Project Coordinator, at 303–293–
5035. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 198 (Friday, October 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62257-62258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24888]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-NER-CACO-10593: 2310-0081-422]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Herring River
Restoration Project, Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Herring River
Restoration Project in Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. The
DEIS provides a systematic analysis of alternative approaches to
restore the Herring River estuary to a more productive and natural
condition after a century of diking and draining.
DATES: The NPS will accept comments on the DEIS from the public for 60
days after the date that the Environmental Protection Agency notices
the availability of the DEIS in its regular Friday Federal Register
listing. A public meeting will be held during the review period to
facilitate the submission of public comment. Once scheduled, the
meeting date will be announced via the Cape Cod National Seashore Web
site (https://www.nps.gov/caco/), the NPS's Planning Environment and
Public Comment (PEPC) Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/herring_river), and a press release to area media.
ADDRESSES: The DEIS for the Herring River Restoration Project will be
available for public review online at the NPS's PEPC Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/herring_river). You may submit your comments by
any one of several methods. The preferred method of comment is via the
internet at (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/herring_river). You may also
mail comments to Herring River Restoration Plan, Cape Cod National
Seashore, 99 Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667. Finally, you may
hand-deliver comments to Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 Marconi Site
Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George E. Price, Jr., Superintendent,
Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02267;
telephone (508) 771-2144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Herring River Restoration Project is a
joint project of the Cape Cod National Seashore, the Town of Wellfleet,
and the Town of Truro, Massachusetts Division of Ecological
Restoration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, and the Natural Resource Conservation
Service.
The Herring River is the largest estuary on outer Cape Cod,
encompassing more than 1,100 acres of degraded wetlands in a
complicated network of five valleys: The Herring River, Mill Creek,
Pole Dike Creek, Bound Brook, and Duck Harbor. The Chequessett Neck
Road dike was built in 1908 at the mouth of the Herring River to
restrict natural tidal flows. Ditches were constructed to drain the
normally saturated flood plain soil. The once extensive salt marshes
have been transformed into stands of invasive plants, shrubby thickets,
and forests. The old salt marsh peat, deprived of the tides, has
decomposed and compressed, sinking the surface of the flood plain as
much as three feet. The decomposition of peat has released sulfuric
acid that kills fish and other aquatic life, and low summertime
dissolved oxygen has also harmed aquatic life.
The DEIS analyzes three action alternatives and the no action
[[Page 62258]]
alternative, as described below: Alternative A would leave in place the
current tide control structure at Chequessett Neck Road and continue
management of the estuary without restoration.
Alternative B would employ an adaptive management strategy to
restore tides in the lower reach of the Herring River up to a maximum
high tide of approximately six feet. At this tide level flood
mitigation of sensitive properties can be achieved without a secondary
dike at Mill Creek.
Alternative C would employ an adaptive management strategy to
restore tides up to the maximum Chequessett Neck Road dike capacity (10
foot vertical tide gate opening) with a new dike at Mill Creek that
blocks all tidal influence. This alternative would maximize restoration
in all sub-basins except Mill Creek. Mill Creek would remain
unrestored, but no new flood proofing measures would be needed in Mill
Creek.
Alternative D would employ an adaptive management strategy to
restore tides up to the maximum Chequessett Neck Road dike capacity (10
foot vertical tide gate opening) with a new dike at Mill Creek. Mill
Creek tides would be controlled by this secondary structure to the same
level as that of Alternative B, the maximum level that can be achieved
after flood proofing several low-lying properties. Tidal restoration
would be maximized in all other sub-basins.
For Alternatives B and D, two options are considered for mitigating
project impacts to the Chequessett Yacht & Country Club (CYCC) golf
course, a private golf course in Mill Creek: (1) Raise low-lying
fairways a minimum of two feet above proposed inundation levels, or (2)
relocate low-lying fairways to an undeveloped upland area owned by
CYCC.
Alternative D, with the option to raise existing low-lying fairways
a minimum of two feet above proposed inundation levels, has been
identified as the NPS Preferred Alternative. This alternative best
fulfills the restoration objectives of the project while mitigating
adverse impacts to developed properties.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: August 8, 2012.
Michael A. Caldwell,
Acting Regional Director, National Park Service, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-24888 Filed 10-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-WV-P