Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 61413-61415 [2012-24754]

Download as PDF 61413 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2012 / Notices Number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Type of respondents Average burden per response (in hours) Total burden (in hours) Weekly Reporting States ............................................................................................................... Territories ......................................................................................................... Cities ................................................................................................................ 50 5 2 52 52 52 3 1.5 3 7,800 390 312 States ............................................................................................................... Territories ......................................................................................................... Cities ................................................................................................................ 50 5 2 1 1 1 16 10 16 800 50 32 Total .......................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 9,384 Annual Reporting Dated: October 2, 2012. Ron A. Otten, Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–24756 Filed 10–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES [60-Day–13–0941] wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send comments to Ron Otten, at 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information 15:28 Oct 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 Proposed Project Evaluation of Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen RelationshipsTM (0920–0941, Expiration 6/13/2015)—REVISION—National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description Centers for Disease Control and Prevention VerDate Mar<15>2010 technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen RelationshipsTM is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new teen dating violence prevention initiative. To address the gaps in research and practice, CDC has developed Dating Matters, teen dating violence prevention program that includes programming for students, parents, educators, as well as policy development. Dating Matters is based on the current evidence about what works in prevention and focuses on high-risk, urban communities where participants include: middle school students age 11 to 14 years; middle school parents; brand ambassadors; educators; school leadership; program implementers; community representatives; and local health department representatives in the following communities: Alameda County, California; Baltimore, Maryland; Broward County, Florida; and Chicago, Illinois. The primary goal of the current proposal is to expand and add instruments to the approved outcome and implementation evaluation of Dating Matters in the four metropolitan cities to determine its feasibility, cost, and effectiveness. In the evaluation, a standard model of TDV prevention (Safe Dates administered in 8th grade) will be compared to a comprehensive model (programs administered in 6th, 7th, and PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 8th grade as well as parent, educator, policy, and communications interventions). Population. The study population includes students in 6th, 7th and 8th grades at 44 schools in the four participating sites. At most, schools are expected to have 6 classrooms per grade, with an average of 30 students per classroom yielding a population of 23,760 students (44 schools × 3 grades × 6 classrooms per grade × 30 students per classroom). All student evaluation activities will take place during the school year. The sampling frame for parents, given that we would only include one parent per student, is also 23,760 for the three years of data collection covered by this package. If we assume 40 educators per school, the sampling frame for the educator sample is 1,760. Students: In each year of data collection, we will recruit 11,880 students (30 students per classroom × 3 classrooms per grade × 3 grades × 44 schools). We assume a 95% participation rate (n = 11,286) for the baseline student survey and 90% participation rate (n = 10,692) at followup survey. In this revision, we request to drop the mid-term survey to reduce burden on schools. Parents: We will recruit a sample of 2,020 parents. We expect that 95% of the 2,020 parents will agree to participate at baseline (n = 1,919) and 90% will participate in the follow-up survey (n = 1,818) parents. Educators: We will attempt to recruit all educators in each school (44 schools × 40 educators per school = 1,760). We expect a 95% participation rate for an estimated sample of 1,672 educators at baseline and 90% participation rate at follow-up for an estimated sample of 1,584. School data extractors: We will attempt to recruit one data extractor per 44 schools to extract school data to be E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1 61414 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2012 / Notices used in conjunction with the outcome data for the students. Data extractors in each school will access individual school-level data for those students in their school who consented and participated in the baseline student survey (3 × 4 × 30 × 95% = 342). Implementation Evaluation For the student focus groups, we will recruit groups of 10 students per group. Two groups will be held per each of the 4 sites (10 × 2 × 4 = 80 total student participants). Student implementer focus groups will be organized by site, with two annual focus groups per site with 10 implementers in each group (10 × 2 × 4 = 80 total student program implementer participants). Communications focus groups will be organized by site with up to four groups per site (4 × 4 × 6 = 96 total student participants). Parent program implementer focus groups will be organized by site, with two annual focus groups per site with 10 implementers in each group (10 × 2 × 4 = 80 total parent program implementer participants). School leadership: based on the predicted number of two school leadership per comprehensive school (21 schools), the number of respondents will be 42. Local Health Department representative: based on the predicted number of four communities/sites and four local health department representatives working on Dating Matters per community, the number of respondents will be 16. Community Advisory Board Representative: based on the predicted number of 20 community representatives per 4 communities/sites, the number of respondents will be 80. Parent Program Manager: With a maximum of one parent program manager per community/site, the number of program manager respondents will be 4. It is anticipated that they will receive up to 50 TA requests per year and complete the form 50 times. Student Program Master Trainer TA Form: With a maximum of 3 master trainers per community. There will be 12 master trainers. It is anticipated that they will receive up to 50 TA requests per year and complete the form 50 times. Parent Curricula Implementers: it is expected that each school implementing the comprehensive approach (n = 21) will have two implementers (or 42 parent program implementer respondents). Please note that on the burden table the number of respondents is multiplied by the number of sessions in each parent program. Student Curricula Implementers: based on the predicted number of 20 student curricula implementers per grade per site that will be completing fidelity instruments, the total number of respondents will be 80 per grade (20 × 4). Brand Ambassadors: The Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey will be provided to each brand ambassador (n = 20) in each community with a maximum of 80 brand ambassadors. Communications Implementers (‘‘Brand Ambassador Coordinators’’): The Communications Campaign Tracking form will be provided to each brand ambassador coordinator in each community. With a maximum of one brand ambassador coordinator per community (n = 4), the feedback form will be collected from a total of 4 brand ambassador coordinators. Parent Program Participants: The 6th and 7th grade parent satisfaction questionnaires will be completed by parent participating in the parent program in each community. There is a maximum number of parent respondents of 1,890 (18 × 5 × 21) for the 6th grade satisfaction questionnaire and 1,890 for the 7th grade satisfaction questionnaire. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN Form name Student Program Participant. Student Program Participant. School data extractor .... Parent Program Participant. Parent Program Participant. Educator ........................ Student Outcome Survey Baseline—Attachment D. Student Outcome Survey Follow-up—Attachment E. School Indicators—Attachment G ....................... Parent Outcome Baseline Survey—Attachment H. Parent Outcome Follow-up Survey—Attachment EEEE. Educator Outcome Survey (baseline)—Attachment I. Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey—Attachment J. School Leadership Capacity and Readiness Survey—Attachment K. Parent Program Fidelity 6th Grade Session 1– Session 6—Attachment L–Q. Parent Program Fidelity 7th Grade Session 1, 3, 5—Attachment R–T. Student Program Fidelity 6th Grade Session 1– Session 6—Attachment U–Z. Student Program Fidelity 7th Grade Session 1– Session 7—Attachment AA–GG. Student Program Fidelity 8th Grade Session 1– Session 10 (comprehensive)—Attachment HH–QQ. Communications Campaign Tracking—Attachment RR. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Student Brand ambassador. School leadership .......... Parent Curricula Implementer. Parent Curricula Implementer. Student Curricula Implementer. Student Curricula Implementer. Student Curricula Implementer. Communications Coordinator. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Oct 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Type of respondent Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Average burden per response (hours) Total burden (hours) 11,286 1 45/60 8465 10,692 1 45/60 8019 44 1,919 342 1 15/60 1 3762 1919 1,818 1 1 1818 1,672 1 30/60 836 80 2 20/60 53 42 1 1 42 210 3 15/60 158 126 3 15/60 95 480 1 15/60 120 560 1 15/60 140 800 1 15/60 200 4 4 20/60 5 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1 61415 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 9, 2012 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN—Continued Form name Local Health Department Representative. Student Program Participant. Student Curricula Implementer. Parent Curricula Implementer. Student Curricula Implementer. Student Master Trainer .. Local Health Department Capacity and Readiness—Attachment SS. Student participant focus group guide (time spent in focus group)—Attachment ZZ. Student curricula implementer focus group guide (time spent in focus group)—Attachment AAA. Parent curricula implementer focus group guide (time spent in focus group)—Attachment BBB. Safe Dates 8th Grade Session 1–Session 10 (standard)—Attachment CCC–LLL. Student program master trainer TA form—Attachment DDDD. Educator Outcome Survey (follow-up)—Attachment IIII. Community Capacity/Readiness Assessment— Attachment JJJJ. Communications Focus Groups—Attachment KKKK. Parent Program Manager TA Tracking Form— Attachment LLLL. 6th Grade Curricula Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire—Attachment MMMM. 7th Grade Curricula Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire—Attachment NNNN. Educator ........................ Community Advisory Board Member. Students ......................... Parent Program Manager. Parent Program Participant. Parent Program Participant. Total ........................ .............................................................................. Dated: October 2, 2012. Ron A. Otten, Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–24754 Filed 10–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Type of respondent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30-Day–13–12QI] wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call (404) 639–7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Oct 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 1 2 32 80 1 1.5 120 80 1 1 80 80 1 1 80 800 1 15/60 200 12 50 10/60 100 1584 1 30/60 792 80 1 1 80 96 1 1.5 144 4 50 10/60 33 1890 1 10/60 315 1890 1 10/60 315 ........................ ........................ ........................ 27923 Proposed Project EHS-Net National Voluntary Environmental Assessment Information System (NVEAIS)—New—National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC is requesting OMB approval for a National Voluntary Environmental Assessment Information System to collect data from foodborne illness outbreak environmental assessments routinely conducted by local, state, territorial, or tribal food safety programs during outbreak investigations. Environmental assessment data are not currently collected at the national level. The data reported through this information system will provide timely data on the causes of outbreaks, including environmental factors associated with outbreaks, and are essential to environmental public health regulators’ efforts to respond more effectively to outbreaks and prevent future, similar outbreaks. The information system was developed by the Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net), a collaborative project of federal and state public health agencies. The EHS-Net has developed a standardized instrument for reporting data relevant to foodborne PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Total burden (hours) 16 Background and Brief Description DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Average burden per response (hours) Sfmt 4703 illness outbreak environmental assessments. State, local, tribal, and territorial food safety programs are the respondents for this data collection. Although it is not possible to determine how many programs will choose to participate, as NVEAIS is voluntary, the maximum potential number of program respondents is approximately 3,000. These programs will be reporting data on outbreaks, not their programs or personnel. It is not possible to determine exactly how many outbreaks will occur in the future, nor where they will occur. However, we can estimate, based on existing data, that a maximum of 1,400 foodborne illness outbreaks will occur annually. Only programs in the jurisdictions in which these outbreaks occur would report to NVEAIS. Consequently, we have based our respondent burden estimate on the number of outbreaks likely to occur each year. Assuming each outbreak occurs in a different jurisdiction, there will be one respondent per outbreak. There are three activities associated with NVEAIS that require a burden estimate. The first activity is the manager interview that will be conducted at each establishment associated with an outbreak. Most outbreaks are associated with only one establishment; however, some are associated with multiple E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61413-61415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60-Day-13-0941]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

    In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on 
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. 
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a 
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570 or 
send comments to Ron Otten, at 1600 Clifton Road, MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 
30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received 
within 60 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Evaluation of Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen 
Relationships\TM\ (0920-0941, Expiration 6/13/2015)--REVISION--National 
Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen 
Relationships\TM\ is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 
new teen dating violence prevention initiative.
    To address the gaps in research and practice, CDC has developed 
Dating Matters, teen dating violence prevention program that includes 
programming for students, parents, educators, as well as policy 
development. Dating Matters is based on the current evidence about what 
works in prevention and focuses on high-risk, urban communities where 
participants include: middle school students age 11 to 14 years; middle 
school parents; brand ambassadors; educators; school leadership; 
program implementers; community representatives; and local health 
department representatives in the following communities: Alameda 
County, California; Baltimore, Maryland; Broward County, Florida; and 
Chicago, Illinois.
    The primary goal of the current proposal is to expand and add 
instruments to the approved outcome and implementation evaluation of 
Dating Matters in the four metropolitan cities to determine its 
feasibility, cost, and effectiveness. In the evaluation, a standard 
model of TDV prevention (Safe Dates administered in 8th grade) will be 
compared to a comprehensive model (programs administered in 6th, 7th, 
and 8th grade as well as parent, educator, policy, and communications 
interventions).
    Population. The study population includes students in 6th, 7th and 
8th grades at 44 schools in the four participating sites. At most, 
schools are expected to have 6 classrooms per grade, with an average of 
30 students per classroom yielding a population of 23,760 students (44 
schools x 3 grades x 6 classrooms per grade x 30 students per 
classroom). All student evaluation activities will take place during 
the school year. The sampling frame for parents, given that we would 
only include one parent per student, is also 23,760 for the three years 
of data collection covered by this package. If we assume 40 educators 
per school, the sampling frame for the educator sample is 1,760.
    Students: In each year of data collection, we will recruit 11,880 
students (30 students per classroom x 3 classrooms per grade x 3 grades 
x 44 schools). We assume a 95% participation rate (n = 11,286) for the 
baseline student survey and 90% participation rate (n = 10,692) at 
follow-up survey. In this revision, we request to drop the mid-term 
survey to reduce burden on schools.
    Parents: We will recruit a sample of 2,020 parents. We expect that 
95% of the 2,020 parents will agree to participate at baseline (n = 
1,919) and 90% will participate in the follow-up survey (n = 1,818) 
parents.
    Educators: We will attempt to recruit all educators in each school 
(44 schools x 40 educators per school = 1,760). We expect a 95% 
participation rate for an estimated sample of 1,672 educators at 
baseline and 90% participation rate at follow-up for an estimated 
sample of 1,584.
    School data extractors: We will attempt to recruit one data 
extractor per 44 schools to extract school data to be

[[Page 61414]]

used in conjunction with the outcome data for the students. Data 
extractors in each school will access individual school-level data for 
those students in their school who consented and participated in the 
baseline student survey (3 x 4 x 30 x 95% = 342).

Implementation Evaluation

    For the student focus groups, we will recruit groups of 10 students 
per group. Two groups will be held per each of the 4 sites (10 x 2 x 4 
= 80 total student participants).
    Student implementer focus groups will be organized by site, with 
two annual focus groups per site with 10 implementers in each group (10 
x 2 x 4 = 80 total student program implementer participants).
    Communications focus groups will be organized by site with up to 
four groups per site (4 x 4 x 6 = 96 total student participants).
    Parent program implementer focus groups will be organized by site, 
with two annual focus groups per site with 10 implementers in each 
group (10 x 2 x 4 = 80 total parent program implementer participants).
    School leadership: based on the predicted number of two school 
leadership per comprehensive school (21 schools), the number of 
respondents will be 42.
    Local Health Department representative: based on the predicted 
number of four communities/sites and four local health department 
representatives working on Dating Matters per community, the number of 
respondents will be 16.
    Community Advisory Board Representative: based on the predicted 
number of 20 community representatives per 4 communities/sites, the 
number of respondents will be 80.
    Parent Program Manager: With a maximum of one parent program 
manager per community/site, the number of program manager respondents 
will be 4. It is anticipated that they will receive up to 50 TA 
requests per year and complete the form 50 times.
    Student Program Master Trainer TA Form: With a maximum of 3 master 
trainers per community. There will be 12 master trainers. It is 
anticipated that they will receive up to 50 TA requests per year and 
complete the form 50 times.
    Parent Curricula Implementers: it is expected that each school 
implementing the comprehensive approach (n = 21) will have two 
implementers (or 42 parent program implementer respondents). Please 
note that on the burden table the number of respondents is multiplied 
by the number of sessions in each parent program.
    Student Curricula Implementers: based on the predicted number of 20 
student curricula implementers per grade per site that will be 
completing fidelity instruments, the total number of respondents will 
be 80 per grade (20 x 4).
    Brand Ambassadors: The Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey will 
be provided to each brand ambassador (n = 20) in each community with a 
maximum of 80 brand ambassadors.
    Communications Implementers (``Brand Ambassador Coordinators''): 
The Communications Campaign Tracking form will be provided to each 
brand ambassador coordinator in each community. With a maximum of one 
brand ambassador coordinator per community (n = 4), the feedback form 
will be collected from a total of 4 brand ambassador coordinators.
    Parent Program Participants: The 6th and 7th grade parent 
satisfaction questionnaires will be completed by parent participating 
in the parent program in each community. There is a maximum number of 
parent respondents of 1,890 (18 x 5 x 21) for the 6th grade 
satisfaction questionnaire and 1,890 for the 7th grade satisfaction 
questionnaire.
    There are no costs to respondents other than their time.

                                                               Estimated Annualized Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                             Number of    Average burden
               Type of respondent                               Form name                    Number of     responses per   per response    Total burden
                                                                                            respondents     respondent        (hours)         (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student Program Participant....................  Student Outcome Survey Baseline--                11,286               1           45/60            8465
                                                  Attachment D.
Student Program Participant....................  Student Outcome Survey Follow-up--               10,692               1           45/60            8019
                                                  Attachment E.
School data extractor..........................  School Indicators--Attachment G........              44             342           15/60            3762
Parent Program Participant.....................  Parent Outcome Baseline Survey--                  1,919               1               1            1919
                                                  Attachment H.
Parent Program Participant.....................  Parent Outcome Follow-up Survey--                 1,818               1               1            1818
                                                  Attachment EEEE.
Educator.......................................  Educator Outcome Survey (baseline)--              1,672               1           30/60             836
                                                  Attachment I.
Student Brand ambassador.......................  Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey--             80               2           20/60              53
                                                  Attachment J.
School leadership..............................  School Leadership Capacity and                       42               1               1              42
                                                  Readiness Survey--Attachment K.
Parent Curricula Implementer...................  Parent Program Fidelity 6th Grade                   210               3           15/60             158
                                                  Session 1-Session 6--Attachment L-Q.
Parent Curricula Implementer...................  Parent Program Fidelity 7th Grade                   126               3           15/60              95
                                                  Session 1, 3, 5--Attachment R-T.
Student Curricula Implementer..................  Student Program Fidelity 6th Grade                  480               1           15/60             120
                                                  Session 1-Session 6--Attachment U-Z.
Student Curricula Implementer..................  Student Program Fidelity 7th Grade                  560               1           15/60             140
                                                  Session 1-Session 7--Attachment AA-GG.
Student Curricula Implementer..................  Student Program Fidelity 8th Grade                  800               1           15/60             200
                                                  Session 1-Session 10 (comprehensive)--
                                                  Attachment HH-QQ.
Communications Coordinator.....................  Communications Campaign Tracking--                    4               4           20/60               5
                                                  Attachment RR.

[[Page 61415]]

 
Local Health Department Representative.........  Local Health Department Capacity and                 16               1               2              32
                                                  Readiness--Attachment SS.
Student Program Participant....................  Student participant focus group guide                80               1             1.5             120
                                                  (time spent in focus group)--
                                                  Attachment ZZ.
Student Curricula Implementer..................  Student curricula implementer focus                  80               1               1              80
                                                  group guide (time spent in focus
                                                  group)--Attachment AAA.
Parent Curricula Implementer...................  Parent curricula implementer focus                   80               1               1              80
                                                  group guide (time spent in focus
                                                  group)--Attachment BBB.
Student Curricula Implementer..................  Safe Dates 8th Grade Session 1-Session              800               1           15/60             200
                                                  10 (standard)--Attachment CCC-LLL.
Student Master Trainer.........................  Student program master trainer TA form--             12              50           10/60             100
                                                  Attachment DDDD.
Educator.......................................  Educator Outcome Survey (follow-up)--              1584               1           30/60             792
                                                  Attachment IIII.
Community Advisory Board Member................  Community Capacity/Readiness                         80               1               1              80
                                                  Assessment--Attachment JJJJ.
Students.......................................  Communications Focus Groups--Attachment              96               1             1.5             144
                                                  KKKK.
Parent Program Manager.........................  Parent Program Manager TA Tracking                    4              50           10/60              33
                                                  Form--Attachment LLLL.
Parent Program Participant.....................  6th Grade Curricula Parent Satisfaction            1890               1           10/60             315
                                                  Questionnaire--Attachment MMMM.
Parent Program Participant.....................  7th Grade Curricula Parent Satisfaction            1890               1           10/60             315
                                                  Questionnaire--Attachment NNNN.
                                                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total......................................  .......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............           27923
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: October 2, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate 
Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Director, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-24754 Filed 10-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.