Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Three New Equivalent Methods, 60985-60986 [2012-24638]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2012 / Notices assumptions of liability is October 18, 2012. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at https:// www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the intervention or protests. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Dated: September 28, 2012. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–24606 Filed 10–4–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–9738–8] Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Three New Equivalent Methods Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice of the designation of three new equivalent methods for monitoring ambient air quality. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated, three new equivalent methods, one for measuring concentrations of PM2.5, one for measuring concentrations of PM10, and one for measuring concentrations of PM10–2.5 in the ambient air. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Vanderpool, Human Exposure pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 Oct 04, 2012 Jkt 229001 and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–D205–03), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. Email: Vanderpool.Robert@epa.gov. In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set forth in 40 CFR part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby permitting their use under 40 CFR part 58 by States and other agencies for determining compliance with the NAAQSs. The EPA hereby announces the designation of three new equivalent methods, one for measuring concentrations of PM2.5, one for measuring concentrations of PM10, and one for measuring concentrations of PM10–2.5 in the ambient air. These designations are made under the provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as amended on August 31, 2011 (76 FR 54326–54341). The new equivalent methods are automated monitoring methods utilizing a measurement principle based on sample collection by filtration and analysis by beta radiation attenuation. The newly designated equivalent methods are identified as follows: EQPM–0912–204, ‘‘Teledyne Model 602 BetaPLUS Particle Measurement System’’ and ‘‘SWAM 5a Dual Channel Monitor’’ configured for 1-hour measurements of PM2.5 by beta attenuation, on either a single (Line A or B) or both sampling lines (Line A and B) simultaneously, using 47 mm glass fiber filters, at a sample flow set to 16.67 liters/min and software version 05– 02.07.63 or later and with an inlet system comprised of a PM10 preimpactor inlet (based on European PM10 inlet design) combined with a BGI VSCCTM PM2.5 cyclone separator. Operated in accordance with the Teledyne Model 602 BetaPLUS Particle Measurement System Operation Manual. EQPM–0912–205, ‘‘Teledyne Model 602 BetaPLUS Particle Measurement System’’ and ‘‘SWAM 5a Dual Channel Monitor’’ configured for 1-hour measurements of PM10 by beta attenuation on a single sampling line (Line A or B, but not both together), SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60985 with the standard, louvered US EPA PM10 size selective inlet specified in 40 CFR part 50 Appendix L, using 47 mm glass fiber filters, at a sample flow set to 16.67 liters/min and software version 05–02.07.63 or later. Operated in accordance with the Teledyne Model 602 BetaPLUS Particle Measurement System Operation Manual.’’ EQPM–0912–206, ‘‘Teledyne Model 602 BetaPLUS Particle Measurement System’’ and ‘‘SWAM 5a Dual Channel Monitor’’ configured for 1-hour measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 by beta attenuation, with the standard, louvered US EPA PM10 size selective inlet specified in 40 CFR part 50 Appendix L on one channel (Line A or B) and with an inlet system comprised of a PM10 pre-impactor inlet (based on European PM10 inlet design) combined with a BGI VSCCTM PM2.5 cyclone separator on the second channel (Line A or B, but always with PM10 on the opposite Line). The PM10–2.5 mass measurement is performed using the resultant subtraction of PM10 minus PM2.5. Operated in accordance with the Teledyne Model 602 BetaPLUS Particle Measurement System Operation Manual. Applications for the equivalent method determinations for these candidate methods were received by the EPA Office of Research and Development on April 16, 2012. The monitors are commercially available from the applicant, Teledyne Advanced Pollution Instrumentation, 9480 Carroll Park Drive, San Diego, CA 92121. Test monitors representative of these methods have been tested in accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR part 53, as amended on August 31, 2011. After reviewing the results of those tests and other information submitted in the applications, EPA has determined, in accordance with Part 53, that these methods should be designated as equivalent methods. The information in the applications will be kept on file, either at EPA’s National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or in an approved archive storage facility, and will be available for inspection (with advance notice) to the extent consistent with 40 CFR part 2 (EPA’s regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act). As designated equivalent methods, these methods are acceptable for use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements of 40 CFR part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes, the methods must be used in strict accordance with the operation or instruction manuals E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1 60986 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2012 / Notices associated with the methods and subject to any specifications and limitations (e.g., configuration or operational settings) specified in the applicable designated descriptions (see the identification of the methods above). Use of the methods also should be in general accordance with the guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the ‘‘Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’ EPA/ 600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program’’ EPA–454/B–08–003, December, 2008. Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users are specified under Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR part 58. Consistent or repeated noncompliance should be reported to: Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–E205–01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. Designation of these new equivalent methods is intended to assist the States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance systems under 40 CFR part 58. Questions concerning the commercial availability or technical aspects of the methods should be directed to the applicant. Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory. [FR Doc. 2012–24638 Filed 10–4–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–9005–4] pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–7146 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 09/24/2012 through 09/28/2012 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9 Notice Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters on EISs are available at: https:// VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:25 Oct 04, 2012 Jkt 229001 www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html. Starting October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions on or after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA. While this system eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies to EPA to meet filing requirements, electronic submission does not change requirements for distribution of EISs for public review and comment. To begin using e-NEPA, you must first register with EPA’s electronic reporting site— https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp. EIS No. 20120309, Draft EIS, USACE, CA, SunCreek Specific Plan Project, Development of Plan Area for Mixed Uses, Sacramento County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 11/19/ 2012, Contact: Lisa Gibson 916– 557–5288. EIS No. 20120310, Final EIS, BLM, UT, Sigurd to Red Butte No. 2 345kV Transmission Project, Issuance of Right-of-Way Grant by BLM and Special-Use-Permit by AFS, Sevier, Millard, Iron, Beaver, and Washington Counties, UT, Review Period Ends: 11/05/2012, Contact: Tamara Gertsch 307–775–6115. EIS No. 20120311, Draft Supplement, FHWA, WA, I–90 Snoqualmie Pass East, Avalanche Structures, Kittitas County, WA, Comment Period Ends: 11/19/2012, Contact: Liana Liu 360–753–9553. EIS No. 20120312, Final EIS, USFS, NV, Geothermal Leasing on the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, To Facilitate the Development and Production of Geothermal Energy, Ely, Austin, Tonopah and Bridgeport Ranger Districts, NV, Review Period Ends: 11/05/2012, Contact: Keith Whaley 760–932– 7070. EIS No. 20120313, Final EIS, FHWA, WA, Cattle Point Road Realignment Project, To Maintain Vehicular, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Road Access, San Juan Island National Historical Park and Cattle Point Natural Resources Conservation Area, San Juan County, WA, Review Period Ends: 11/05/2012, Contact: Jerald Weaver 360–378–2223. EIS No. 20120314, Draft EIS, WAPA, WY, Hermosa West Wind Energy Project, To Approve or Deny an Interconnection Request, Albany County, WY, Comment Period Ends: 11/19/2012, Contact: Mark Wieringa 720–962–7448. EIS No. 20120315, Draft EIS, TVA, TN, Dam Safety Modifications at SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Cherokee, Fort Loudoun, Tellico, and Watts Bar Dams, Grainger, Jefferson, Loudoun, Rhea, and Meigs Counties, TN, Comment Period Ends: 11/19/2012, Contact: Charles R. Nicholson 865–632– 3582. EIS No. 20120316, Draft EIS, NIH, MD, National Institutes of Health Animal Center Draft Master Plan, Montgomery County, MD, Comment Period Ends: 12/04/2012, Contact: Valerie Nottingham 301–496–7775. Amended Notices EIS No. 20120238, Draft EIS, GSA, NY, Public Sale of Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Long Island Sound, Suffolk County, NY, Comment Period Ends: 10/26/2012, Contact: John Dugan 617–565–5700. Revision to FR Notice Published 07/ 20/2012; Extending Comment Period from 09/20/2012 to 10/26/2012. Dated: October 2, 2012. Cliff Rader, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. 2012–24630 Filed 10–4–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). ACTION: Notice and request for comment. AGENCY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (‘‘PRA’’), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., the FDIC may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The FDIC, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the renewal of two existing information collections, as required by the PRA. On July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44617), the FDIC solicited public comment for a 60-day period on renewal of the following information collections: Activities and Investments of Insured State Banks (OMB No. 3064– 0111) and Privacy of Consumer Financial Information (OMB No. 3064– 0136). No comments were received. Therefore, the FDIC hereby gives notice SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60985-60986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24638]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9738-8]


Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: 
Designation of Three New Equivalent Methods

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of the designation of three new equivalent methods for 
monitoring ambient air quality.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) has designated, three new equivalent methods, one for 
measuring concentrations of PM2.5, one for measuring 
concentrations of PM10, and one for measuring concentrations 
of PM10-2.5 in the ambient air.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Vanderpool, Human Exposure and 
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03), National Exposure Research 
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. 
Email: Vanderpool.Robert@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR 
part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the 
concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has 
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set 
forth in 40 CFR part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet 
specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either 
reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby 
permitting their use under 40 CFR part 58 by States and other agencies 
for determining compliance with the NAAQSs.
    The EPA hereby announces the designation of three new equivalent 
methods, one for measuring concentrations of PM2.5, one for 
measuring concentrations of PM10, and one for measuring 
concentrations of PM10-2.5 in the ambient air. These 
designations are made under the provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as 
amended on August 31, 2011 (76 FR 54326-54341).
    The new equivalent methods are automated monitoring methods 
utilizing a measurement principle based on sample collection by 
filtration and analysis by beta radiation attenuation. The newly 
designated equivalent methods are identified as follows:
    EQPM-0912-204, ``Teledyne Model 602 Beta\PLUS\ Particle Measurement 
System'' and ``SWAM 5a Dual Channel Monitor'' configured for 1-hour 
measurements of PM2.5 by beta attenuation, on either a 
single (Line A or B) or both sampling lines (Line A and B) 
simultaneously, using 47 mm glass fiber filters, at a sample flow set 
to 16.67 liters/min and software version 05-02.07.63 or later and with 
an inlet system comprised of a PM10 pre-impactor inlet 
(based on European PM10 inlet design) combined with a BGI 
VSCC\TM\ PM2.5 cyclone separator. Operated in accordance 
with the Teledyne Model 602 Beta\PLUS\ Particle Measurement System 
Operation Manual.
    EQPM-0912-205, ``Teledyne Model 602 Beta\PLUS\ Particle Measurement 
System'' and ``SWAM 5a Dual Channel Monitor'' configured for 1-hour 
measurements of PM10 by beta attenuation on a single 
sampling line (Line A or B, but not both together), with the standard, 
louvered US EPA PM10 size selective inlet specified in 40 
CFR part 50 Appendix L, using 47 mm glass fiber filters, at a sample 
flow set to 16.67 liters/min and software version 05-02.07.63 or later. 
Operated in accordance with the Teledyne Model 602 Beta\PLUS\ Particle 
Measurement System Operation Manual.''
    EQPM-0912-206, ``Teledyne Model 602 Beta\PLUS\ Particle Measurement 
System'' and ``SWAM 5a Dual Channel Monitor'' configured for 1-hour 
measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 by beta 
attenuation, with the standard, louvered US EPA PM10 size 
selective inlet specified in 40 CFR part 50 Appendix L on one channel 
(Line A or B) and with an inlet system comprised of a PM10 
pre-impactor inlet (based on European PM10 inlet design) 
combined with a BGI VSCC\TM\ PM2.5 cyclone separator on the 
second channel (Line A or B, but always with PM10 on the 
opposite Line). The PM10-2.5 mass measurement is performed 
using the resultant subtraction of PM10 minus 
PM2.5. Operated in accordance with the Teledyne Model 602 
Beta\PLUS\ Particle Measurement System Operation Manual.
    Applications for the equivalent method determinations for these 
candidate methods were received by the EPA Office of Research and 
Development on April 16, 2012. The monitors are commercially available 
from the applicant, Teledyne Advanced Pollution Instrumentation, 9480 
Carroll Park Drive, San Diego, CA 92121.
    Test monitors representative of these methods have been tested in 
accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR part 
53, as amended on August 31, 2011. After reviewing the results of those 
tests and other information submitted in the applications, EPA has 
determined, in accordance with Part 53, that these methods should be 
designated as equivalent methods. The information in the applications 
will be kept on file, either at EPA's National Exposure Research 
Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or in an 
approved archive storage facility, and will be available for inspection 
(with advance notice) to the extent consistent with 40 CFR part 2 
(EPA's regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act).
    As designated equivalent methods, these methods are acceptable for 
use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements 
of 40 CFR part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes, 
the methods must be used in strict accordance with the operation or 
instruction manuals

[[Page 60986]]

associated with the methods and subject to any specifications and 
limitations (e.g., configuration or operational settings) specified in 
the applicable designated descriptions (see the identification of the 
methods above).
    Use of the methods also should be in general accordance with the 
guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the ``Quality 
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,'' 
EPA/600/R-94/038a and ``Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution 
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 
Program'' EPA-454/B-08-003, December, 2008. Provisions concerning 
modification of such methods by users are specified under Section 2.8 
(Modifications of Methods by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR part 58.
    Consistent or repeated noncompliance should be reported to: 
Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-E205-
01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
    Designation of these new equivalent methods is intended to assist 
the States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance 
systems under 40 CFR part 58. Questions concerning the commercial 
availability or technical aspects of the methods should be directed to 
the applicant.

Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta,
Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2012-24638 Filed 10-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.