Yankee Atomic Electric Company; Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Staff Evaluation; Exemption, 60482-60484 [2012-24281]
Download as PDF
60482
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2012 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2012–24395 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2012–0227]
Regulatory Guide 5.67, Material
Control and Accounting for Uranium
Enrichment Facilities Authorized To
Produce Special Nuclear Material of
Low Strategic Significance
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Regulatory guide; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is withdrawing
Regulatory Guide (RG) 5.67, ‘‘Material
Control and Accounting for Uranium
Enrichment Facilities Authorized to
Produce Special Nuclear Material of
Low Strategic Significance.’’ The guide
is being withdrawn because it is no
longer needed and more extensive
guidance can be found in NUREG/CR–
5734, ‘‘Recommendations to the NRC on
Acceptable Format and Content for the
Fundamental Nuclear Material Control
(FNMC) Plan Required for LowEnriched Uranium Facilities’’ which
was issued in November 1991.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2012–0227 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information on this document. You may
access information related to this
document, which the NRC possesses
and is publicly available, using the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0227. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:36 Oct 02, 2012
Jkt 229001
guidance in the withdrawn regulatory
guide. Therefore, a certificate holder or
licensee who wishes to follow the
guidance bears the responsibility of
demonstrating, in the appropriate
circumstance, that the guidance in the
withdrawn regulatory guide is
applicable to the certificate holder or
licensee’s specific situation. Current
certificate holders or licensees who have
included RG 5.67 in their licensing basis
may continue to use it, and withdrawal
of the guide does not affect their
existing licensing documents or
agreements. Changes to existing licenses
(or 10 CFR part 76 certificates) must be
accomplished in accordance with
applicable NRC requirements.
[FR Doc. 2012–24282 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am]
I. Introduction
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of Sept., 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas H. Boyce,
Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch,
Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research.
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
review of the withdrawal of RG 5.67 is
available in ADAMS under Accession
No. ML12110A280.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Glenn Tuttle, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, Division of Fuel
Cycle Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone:
301–492–3129; or by email at
Glenn.Tuttle@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
defined in 10 CRF 50.109(a)(1) and is
not otherwise inconsistent with the
applicable issue finality provision in 10
CFR Part 52, inasmuch as such
applicants or potential applicants are
not within the scope of entities
protected by the Backfit Rule or the
relevant issue finality provisions in Part
52.
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
The NRC is withdrawing RG 5.67
because its guidance is no longer
needed. RG 5.67 was published in
December 1993 to provide guidance to
the Paducah and Portsmouth Gaseous
Diffusion Plants (GDPs) to develop their
material control and accounting (MC&A)
programs under Title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 76.
RG 5.67 was used in conjunction with
the 10 CFR part 74 MC&A guidance in
NUREG/CR–5734, ‘‘Recommendations
to the NRC on Acceptable Format and
Content for the Fundamental Nuclear
Material Control (FNMC) Plan Required
for Low-Enriched Uranium Facilities’’ to
develop the FNMC plans for the two
GDPs in the 1990s.
The NRC is withdrawing this
regulatory guide because NUREG/CR–
5734 is more comprehensive than RG
5.67 and is applicable to the Paducah
GDP and other uranium enrichment
facilities that have been licensed under
10 CFR part 70. Topics that are covered
only briefly in RG 5.67 are covered in
detail in NUREG/CR–5734. Therefore,
the guidance in RG 5.67 is not needed.
II. Further Information
As discussed above, the guidance
provided in RG 5.67 is no longer
necessary and is addressed in more
detail by NUREG/CR–5734. Regulatory
guides may be withdrawn when their
guidance no longer provides useful
information.
Withdrawal of a regulatory guide
means that the NRC staff no longer
approves, as a generic matter, the
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day
of September, 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas H. Boyce,
Branch Chief, Regulatory Guide Development
Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–029 and 72–31; NRC–2012–
0229]
Yankee Atomic Electric Company;
Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel
Storage Installation, Staff Evaluation;
Exemption
1.0 Background
Yankee Atomic Electric Company
(YAEC, the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License No. DPR–3
which authorizes possession of nuclear
fuel under part 50 of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR).
The license provides, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect. Per 10 CFR part 72, Subpart K, a
general license is issued for the storage
of spent fuel in an Independent Spent
Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) to
persons authorized to possess or operate
nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR
part 50. Thus, YAEC also holds a 10
CFR part 72 general license for storage
of spent fuel and greater than Class C
waste at the Yankee Rowe ISFSI in
Rowe, Massachusetts.
The Yankee Nuclear Power Station
(YNPS) was a Pressurized Water Reactor
in Rowe, Massachusetts, operated by the
Yankee Atomic Electric Company
(YAEC). By February 26, 1992, the
reactor core was removed, and YNPS
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2012 / Notices
had permanently shut down. On
February 27, 1992, YAEC notified the
NRC that power generating operations at
YNPS had permanently ceased. On
August 5, 1992, the NRC amended the
license for YNPS to ‘‘Possession Only.’’
Currently, all remaining fuel on-site at
the facility is stored in dry cask storage
at a stand-alone ISFSI.
The Power Reactor Security Rule,
which applies to all 10 CFR part 50
licensees, was revised on March 27,
2009, with compliance required by
March 31, 2010 (74 FR 13926). The NRC
held a webinar on July 20, 2010, to
provide clarification on the applicability
of the power reactor security regulations
to 10 CFR part 50 licensees undergoing
decommissioning or 10 CFR part 50
licensees that have only a general
licensed ISFSI. On August 2, 2010, the
NRC issued a letter to YAEC clarifying
the applicability of the revised power
reactor security regulations to a part 50
licensee undergoing decommissioning
or a part 50 licensee that has only a
general licensed ISFSI (Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML102160023). In the August 2, 2010,
letter, the NRC noted that there are
currently no security or health and
safety gaps at these facilities that may
not be in compliance with the current
10 CFR 73.55 requirements because the
Security Plans at these facilities meet
the baseline requirements of the
previous version of 10 CFR 73.55 and
also meet the requirements of
subsequent NRC security orders. The
NRC requested a response be submitted
within 120 days of receipt of the August
2, 2010, letter.
By letter dated November 30, 2010
(ADAMS Accession No. ML103550172),
YAEC responded to the August 2, 2010,
letter. In its response, YAEC requested
exemption from certain regulations in
10 CFR 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
Physical Protection of Licensed
Activities in Nuclear Power Reactors
Against Radiological Sabotage,’’ which
it considered either not applicable or
caused an undue burden to a standalone ISFSI. As part of its response,
YAEC submitted a matrix which
described how YAEC either complied
with the new rule and applicable orders
or needed an exemption. In addition,
YAEC clarified that their intent in
submitting the exemption request was to
maintain its NRC-approved Physical
Security Plan (PSP). In addition, YAEC
noted that the statement of
consideration for the Power Reactor
Security Rule states that the
Commission did not intend to make
changes to the substantive requirements
of 10 CFR 72.212 and that the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Oct 02, 2012
Jkt 229001
Commission has initiated a separate
rulemaking to revise the ISFSI security
requirements (74 FR 13958).
2.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, ‘‘Specific
Exemptions,’’ the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
such exemptions from the requirements
in 10 CFR part 73 as it determines are
authorized by law and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense
and security and are otherwise in the
public interest. The NRC evaluated the
exemption requests submitted by YAEC
in its November 30, 2010, letter. After
evaluating the exemption requests, the
NRC staff believes that YAEC should be
granted exemptions from the following
requirements: 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii)
and 10 CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv). Section
73.55(e)(10)(ii) sets forth requirements
for restricting access by waterborne
vehicles and 10 CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv) sets
forth access authorization requirements.
The remaining exemptions requested
were determined either not to be
applicable to the facility or are being
met by the licensee’s current PSP;
therefore, these exemptions were
denied. Additional information
regarding the NRC (staff) evaluation is
documented in a Safety Evaluation
Report that contains Sensitive
Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information and is being withheld from
public inspection in accordance with 10
CFR 2.390.
In considering these exemption
requests, the staff reviewed the current
Yankee Nuclear Power Station Physical
Security Plan (YNPS PSP) (Revision 18),
dated November 28, 2006; and the NRC
letter dated March 13, 2002, and its
attachment, Amendment 156, which
granted YNPS exemptions from certain
requirements of the previous 10 CFR
part 73. The NRC staff also reviewed the
revised Power Reactor Security Rule, 10
CFR 73.55, which became effective on
May 26, 2009 (74 FR 13926), to identify
substantive changes affecting previously
approved exemptions. In addition, the
staff reviewed a 2009 inspection report
prepared after conducting inspections of
the licensee’s facility, procedures, and
PSP for compliance with all applicable
regulations and NRC Orders. Based
upon its review, the staff determined
that current barriers and actions
implemented under the Yankee Rowe
ISFSI PSP meet the intent of the
regulations being exempted, and that
granting the requested exemptions will
not result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the exemptions are authorized by law.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60483
The purpose of the regulations in 10
CFR 73.55 is to establish and maintain
a physical protection system designed to
protect against radiological sabotage.
The function of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii)
is to restrict waterborne vehicle access
and require performance of periodic
surveillance of waterway approaches to
ISFSIs. However, there are no pathways
which allow waterborne vehicles to gain
direct access to the ISFSI. Furthermore,
YAEC employs site specific barriers as
part of its NRC-approved PSP which are
appropriate for the reduced radiological
risk associated with a stand-alone ISFSI.
The purpose of the regulations in 10
CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv) is to ensure
personnel trained as escorts be
knowledgeable of where visitors would
be working within the protected area
and that visitors within the protected
area will be escorted. The NRC staff
determined that the NRC approved
measures currently employed by YAEC
in its PSP are appropriate for the
reduced radiological risk to the public
from the ISFSI and are consistent with
the general performance standards in 10
CFR 73.55(b). Therefore, the NRC staff
concludes that the exemptions do not
pose an increased risk to public health
and safety and are not inimical to the
common defense and security. Given
the above considerations, this
exemption will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and
security.
As discussed above, the purpose of 10
CFR 73.55 is to protect against
radiological sabotage. Granting YAEC an
exemption from the requirements of 10
CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii) and 10 CFR
73.55(g)(8)(iv) would not decrease the
level of security currently in place at the
Yankee Rowe ISFSI. In addition,
granting exemptions to these regulations
will not result in increased radiological
risk to the public from operation of this
general licensed, stand-alone ISFSI.
Accordingly, the NRC staff has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, these exemptions are authorized
by law and are otherwise in the public
interest.
Granting exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii)
and 73.55(g)(8)(iv) involves safeguards
plans. A categorical exclusion for
exemptions involving safeguard plans is
allowed under 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(F) provided that the
criteria in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)–(v) are
also satisfied. In its review of the
exemption request, the NRC determined
that, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25): (i)
Granting the exemptions neither
involves a significant reduction in a
margin of safety nor creates a new or
different kind of accident from any
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
60484
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2012 / Notices
accident previously evaluated, and thus
no significant hazards considerations
because there is no significant increase
in either the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated; (ii) granting the exemptions
would not produce a significant change
in either the types or amounts of any
effluents that may be released offsite
because the requested exemptions
neither change the effluents nor produce
additional avenues of effluent release;
(iii) granting the exemptions would not
result in a significant increase in either
occupational radiation exposure or
public radiation exposure because the
requested exemptions neither introduce
new radiological hazards nor increase
existing radiological hazards; (iv)
granting the exemptions would not
result in a significant construction
impact because there are no
construction activities associated with
the requested exemptions; and; (v)
granting the exemptions would not
result in a significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents because the
exemptions neither reduce the level of
security in place at the Yankee Rowe
ISFSI nor create new accident
precursors. Accordingly, this exemption
meets the criteria for a categorical
exclusion in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(F).
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
3.0
Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, the exemptions are authorized by
law, will not endanger life or property
or the common defense and security,
and are otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants YAEC an exemption from the 10
CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii) requirement to
restrict waterborne vehicle access and
perform periodic surveillance of
waterway approaches as well as the 10
CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv) requirement for
escort personnel to be generally
knowledgeable of visitor activities. In
addition, YAEC shall continue to follow
the NRC approved ISFSI PSP and
applicable NRC orders. As discussed in
the preceding paragraph, the
Commission has determined that this
exemption meets the criteria for
categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(F). Therefore, pursuant
to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared in
connection with the granting of these
exemptions. These exemptions are
effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of September, 2012.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Oct 02, 2012
Jkt 229001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Douglas W. Weaver,
Deputy Director, Division of Spent Fuel
Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2012–24281 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an email
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments
must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.
Dated: September 28, 2012.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–24340 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Extension: Form 11–K.
OMB Control No. 3235–0082, SEC File No.
270–101.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Form 11–K (17 CFR 249.311) is the
annual report designed for use by
employee stock purchase, savings and
similar plans to comply with the
reporting requirements under Section
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’) (15 U.S.C.
78o(d)). Section 15(d) establishes a
periodic reporting obligation for every
issuer of a class of securities registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
‘‘Securities Act’’)(15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.).
Form 11–K provides employees of an
issuer with financial information so that
they can assess the performance of the
investment vehicle or stock plan. Form
11–K is filed on occasion. The
information collected must be filed with
the Commission and is publicly
available. Form 11–K takes
approximately 30 burden hours per
response and is filed by 2,000
respondents for total of 60,000 burden
hours.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
The public may view the background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site,
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
[Investment Company Act Release No.
30222; 812–13820]
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund
Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
September 26, 2012.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of an application for an
order under section 12(d)(1)(J) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) for exemptions from sections
12(d)(1)(A), (B), and (C) of the Act and
under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act
for an exemption from section 17(a) of
the Act.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION:
Applicants request an order that would
permit certain registered open-end
management investment companies that
operate as ‘‘funds of funds’’ to acquire
shares of certain registered open-end
and closed-end management investment
companies and unit investment trusts
that are within and outside the same
group of investment companies as the
acquiring investment companies.
APPLICANTS: PowerShares ExchangeTraded Fund Trust, PowerShares
Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II,
PowerShares Actively Managed
Exchange-Traded Fund Trust (each, a
‘‘Trust’’) and Invesco PowerShares
Capital Management LLC (the
‘‘Adviser’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on September 3, 2010, and amended on
December 22, 2010, October 13, 2011,
April 23, 2012, September 5, 2012, and
September 20, 2012.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the application will
be issued unless the Commission orders
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60482-60484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24281]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-029 and 72-31; NRC-2012-0229]
Yankee Atomic Electric Company; Yankee Rowe Independent Spent
Fuel Storage Installation, Staff Evaluation; Exemption
1.0 Background
Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC, the licensee) is the holder
of Facility Operating License No. DPR-3 which authorizes possession of
nuclear fuel under part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR). The license provides, among other things, that
the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) now or
hereafter in effect. Per 10 CFR part 72, Subpart K, a general license
is issued for the storage of spent fuel in an Independent Spent Fuel
Storage Installation (ISFSI) to persons authorized to possess or
operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR part 50. Thus, YAEC also
holds a 10 CFR part 72 general license for storage of spent fuel and
greater than Class C waste at the Yankee Rowe ISFSI in Rowe,
Massachusetts.
The Yankee Nuclear Power Station (YNPS) was a Pressurized Water
Reactor in Rowe, Massachusetts, operated by the Yankee Atomic Electric
Company (YAEC). By February 26, 1992, the reactor core was removed, and
YNPS
[[Page 60483]]
had permanently shut down. On February 27, 1992, YAEC notified the NRC
that power generating operations at YNPS had permanently ceased. On
August 5, 1992, the NRC amended the license for YNPS to ``Possession
Only.'' Currently, all remaining fuel on-site at the facility is stored
in dry cask storage at a stand-alone ISFSI.
The Power Reactor Security Rule, which applies to all 10 CFR part
50 licensees, was revised on March 27, 2009, with compliance required
by March 31, 2010 (74 FR 13926). The NRC held a webinar on July 20,
2010, to provide clarification on the applicability of the power
reactor security regulations to 10 CFR part 50 licensees undergoing
decommissioning or 10 CFR part 50 licensees that have only a general
licensed ISFSI. On August 2, 2010, the NRC issued a letter to YAEC
clarifying the applicability of the revised power reactor security
regulations to a part 50 licensee undergoing decommissioning or a part
50 licensee that has only a general licensed ISFSI (Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML102160023). In the August 2, 2010, letter, the NRC noted that there
are currently no security or health and safety gaps at these facilities
that may not be in compliance with the current 10 CFR 73.55
requirements because the Security Plans at these facilities meet the
baseline requirements of the previous version of 10 CFR 73.55 and also
meet the requirements of subsequent NRC security orders. The NRC
requested a response be submitted within 120 days of receipt of the
August 2, 2010, letter.
By letter dated November 30, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML103550172), YAEC responded to the August 2, 2010, letter. In its
response, YAEC requested exemption from certain regulations in 10 CFR
73.55, ``Requirements for Physical Protection of Licensed Activities in
Nuclear Power Reactors Against Radiological Sabotage,'' which it
considered either not applicable or caused an undue burden to a stand-
alone ISFSI. As part of its response, YAEC submitted a matrix which
described how YAEC either complied with the new rule and applicable
orders or needed an exemption. In addition, YAEC clarified that their
intent in submitting the exemption request was to maintain its NRC-
approved Physical Security Plan (PSP). In addition, YAEC noted that the
statement of consideration for the Power Reactor Security Rule states
that the Commission did not intend to make changes to the substantive
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and that the Commission has initiated a
separate rulemaking to revise the ISFSI security requirements (74 FR
13958).
2.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific Exemptions,'' the Commission
may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements in 10 CFR part
73 as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the
public interest. The NRC evaluated the exemption requests submitted by
YAEC in its November 30, 2010, letter. After evaluating the exemption
requests, the NRC staff believes that YAEC should be granted exemptions
from the following requirements: 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii) and 10 CFR
73.55(g)(8)(iv). Section 73.55(e)(10)(ii) sets forth requirements for
restricting access by waterborne vehicles and 10 CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv)
sets forth access authorization requirements. The remaining exemptions
requested were determined either not to be applicable to the facility
or are being met by the licensee's current PSP; therefore, these
exemptions were denied. Additional information regarding the NRC
(staff) evaluation is documented in a Safety Evaluation Report that
contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and is being
withheld from public inspection in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390.
In considering these exemption requests, the staff reviewed the
current Yankee Nuclear Power Station Physical Security Plan (YNPS PSP)
(Revision 18), dated November 28, 2006; and the NRC letter dated March
13, 2002, and its attachment, Amendment 156, which granted YNPS
exemptions from certain requirements of the previous 10 CFR part 73.
The NRC staff also reviewed the revised Power Reactor Security Rule, 10
CFR 73.55, which became effective on May 26, 2009 (74 FR 13926), to
identify substantive changes affecting previously approved exemptions.
In addition, the staff reviewed a 2009 inspection report prepared after
conducting inspections of the licensee's facility, procedures, and PSP
for compliance with all applicable regulations and NRC Orders. Based
upon its review, the staff determined that current barriers and actions
implemented under the Yankee Rowe ISFSI PSP meet the intent of the
regulations being exempted, and that granting the requested exemptions
will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore, the exemptions are
authorized by law.
The purpose of the regulations in 10 CFR 73.55 is to establish and
maintain a physical protection system designed to protect against
radiological sabotage. The function of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii) is to
restrict waterborne vehicle access and require performance of periodic
surveillance of waterway approaches to ISFSIs. However, there are no
pathways which allow waterborne vehicles to gain direct access to the
ISFSI. Furthermore, YAEC employs site specific barriers as part of its
NRC-approved PSP which are appropriate for the reduced radiological
risk associated with a stand-alone ISFSI. The purpose of the
regulations in 10 CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv) is to ensure personnel trained as
escorts be knowledgeable of where visitors would be working within the
protected area and that visitors within the protected area will be
escorted. The NRC staff determined that the NRC approved measures
currently employed by YAEC in its PSP are appropriate for the reduced
radiological risk to the public from the ISFSI and are consistent with
the general performance standards in 10 CFR 73.55(b). Therefore, the
NRC staff concludes that the exemptions do not pose an increased risk
to public health and safety and are not inimical to the common defense
and security. Given the above considerations, this exemption will not
endanger life or property or the common defense and security.
As discussed above, the purpose of 10 CFR 73.55 is to protect
against radiological sabotage. Granting YAEC an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii) and 10 CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv)
would not decrease the level of security currently in place at the
Yankee Rowe ISFSI. In addition, granting exemptions to these
regulations will not result in increased radiological risk to the
public from operation of this general licensed, stand-alone ISFSI.
Accordingly, the NRC staff has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, these exemptions are authorized by law and are otherwise in the
public interest.
Granting exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR
73.55(e)(10)(ii) and 73.55(g)(8)(iv) involves safeguards plans. A
categorical exclusion for exemptions involving safeguard plans is
allowed under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(F) provided that the criteria in
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)-(v) are also satisfied. In its review of the
exemption request, the NRC determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25): (i) Granting the exemptions neither involves a
significant reduction in a margin of safety nor creates a new or
different kind of accident from any
[[Page 60484]]
accident previously evaluated, and thus no significant hazards
considerations because there is no significant increase in either the
probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; (ii)
granting the exemptions would not produce a significant change in
either the types or amounts of any effluents that may be released
offsite because the requested exemptions neither change the effluents
nor produce additional avenues of effluent release; (iii) granting the
exemptions would not result in a significant increase in either
occupational radiation exposure or public radiation exposure because
the requested exemptions neither introduce new radiological hazards nor
increase existing radiological hazards; (iv) granting the exemptions
would not result in a significant construction impact because there are
no construction activities associated with the requested exemptions;
and; (v) granting the exemptions would not result in a significant
increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological
accidents because the exemptions neither reduce the level of security
in place at the Yankee Rowe ISFSI nor create new accident precursors.
Accordingly, this exemption meets the criteria for a categorical
exclusion in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(F).
3.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, the exemptions are authorized by law, will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants YAEC an
exemption from the 10 CFR 73.55(e)(10)(ii) requirement to restrict
waterborne vehicle access and perform periodic surveillance of waterway
approaches as well as the 10 CFR 73.55(g)(8)(iv) requirement for escort
personnel to be generally knowledgeable of visitor activities. In
addition, YAEC shall continue to follow the NRC approved ISFSI PSP and
applicable NRC orders. As discussed in the preceding paragraph, the
Commission has determined that this exemption meets the criteria for
categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(F).
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection
with the granting of these exemptions. These exemptions are effective
upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of September, 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Douglas W. Weaver,
Deputy Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2012-24281 Filed 10-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P