Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; The 2002 Base Year Inventory for the Parkersburg Area, 60087-60089 [2012-24244]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
60087
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—2002 BASE YEAR INVENTORY—WEST VIRGINIA PORTION OF HUNTINGTON AREA IN TONS PER YEAR (TPY)—
Continued
Source sector
NH3
NOX
PM10
PM2.5
SO2
VOC
Biogenic ...................................................
N/A
155
N/A
N/A
N/A
20,869
Total ..................................................
444
42,874
9,420
2,745
87,206
33,283
The CAA section 172(c)(3) emissions
inventory is developed by the
incorporation of data from multiple
sources. States were required to develop
and submit to EPA a triennial emissions
inventory according to the Consolidated
Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) for all
source categories (i.e., point, area,
nonroad mobile and on-road mobile).
The review and evaluation of the
methods used for the emissions
inventory submitted by West Virginia
are found in the Technical Support
Document dated August 12, 2010,
available online at www.regulations.gov,
Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0119.
EPA finds that the process used to
develop this emissions inventory for the
Huntington Area is adequate to meet the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3),
the implementing regulations, and EPA
guidance for emission inventories.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the 2002
base year emissions inventory portion of
the SIP revision submitted by the State
of West Virginia on May 28, 2009 for the
Huntington Area. We have made the
determination that this action is
consistent with section 110 of the CAA.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Oct 01, 2012
Jkt 229001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
pertaining to the PM2.5 2002 base year
emissions inventory portion of the West
Virginia SIP for the Huntington Area,
does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: September 13, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012–24240 Filed 10–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0077; FRL–9735–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; The 2002 Base Year Inventory
for the Parkersburg Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 2002
base year emissions inventory portion of
the West Virginia State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of West Virginia, through the West
Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection (WVDEP), on September 9,
2008 for the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV–
OH nonattainment area (hereafter
referred to as the Parkersburg Area or
Area). The emissions inventory is part
of the West Virginia September 9, 2008
SIP revision that was submitted to meet
nonattainment requirements related to
West Virginia’s portion of the
Parkersburg Area for the 1997 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) SIP. EPA is proposing to
approve the 2002 base year PM2.5
emissions inventory for the Parkersburg
Area in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before November 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2010–0077 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: mastro.donna@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0140,
Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
60088
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Director, Office of Air Program
Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–
0077. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Oct 01, 2012
Jkt 229001
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE., Charleston, West
Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652),
EPA promulgated the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS, including an annual standard
of 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/
m3) based on a 3-year average of annual
mean PM2.5 concentrations, and a 24hour (or daily) standard of 65 mg/m3
based on a 3-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations.
EPA established the standards based on
significant evidence and numerous
health studies demonstrating that
serious health effects are associated
with exposures to PM2.5.
Following promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the
CAA to designate areas throughout the
United States as attaining or not
attaining the NAAQS; this designation
process is described in section 107(d)(1)
of the CAA. In 1999, EPA and state air
quality agencies initiated the monitoring
process for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and,
by January 2001, established a complete
set of air quality monitors. On January
5, 2005, EPA promulgated initial air
quality designations for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS (70 FR 944), which became
effective on April 5, 2005, based on air
quality monitoring data for calendar
years 2001–03.
On April 14, 2005, EPA promulgated
a supplemental rule amending the
agency’s initial designations (70 FR
19844), with the same effective date
(April 5, 2005) at 70 FR 944. As a result
of this supplemental rule, PM2.5
nonattainment designations are in effect
for 39 areas, comprising 208 counties
within 20 states (and the District of
Columbia) nationwide, with a combined
population of approximately 88 million.
The Parkersburg Area, which is the
subject of this rulemaking, was included
in the list of areas not attaining the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS. The West Virginia
portion of the Parkersburg Area consists
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of Wood County and the Grant Tax
District of Pleasants County.
On November 20, 2009 (74 FR 60199),
EPA determined that West Virginia had
attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Parkersburg Area. That determination
was based on complete, quality-assured,
quality-controlled, and certified ambient
air monitoring data for the 2006–2008
three-year period that showed the area
attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and
continues to attain the standard. The
November 20, 2009 determination
suspended the requirements for West
Virginia to submit an attainment
demonstration, associated reasonably
available control measures, a reasonable
further progress plan, contingency
measures, and other planning SIP
revisions related to attainment of the
standard for so long as the
nonattainment area continues to meet
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. Section
172(c)(3) of the CAA requires
submission and approval of a
comprehensive, accurate, and current
inventory of actual emissions. This
proposed approval is limited to the
emissions inventory for the Parkersburg
Area. Separate action will be taken on
the remainder of West Virginia’s SIP
submittal.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The 2002 base year emission
inventory submitted by WVDEP on
September 9, 2008 for the Parkersburg
Area includes emissions estimates that
cover the general source categories of
point sources, non-road mobile sources,
area sources, on-road mobile sources,
and biogenic sources. The pollutants
that comprise the inventory are nitrogen
oxides (NOX), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), PM2.5, coarse
particles (PM10), ammonia (NH3) and
sulfur dioxide (SO2). EPA has reviewed
the results, procedures and
methodologies for the base year
emissions inventory submitted by
WVDEP. The year 2002 was selected by
WVDEP as the base year for the
emissions inventory per 40 CFR
51.1008(b). A discussion of the
emissions inventory development as
well as the emissions inventory for the
Parkersburg Area can be found in
Appendices C and D of the September
9, 2008 SIP submittal.
Table 1, below, provides a summary
of the annual 2002 emissions of NOX,
VOCs, PM2.5, PM10, NH3 and SO2 for the
West Virginia portion of the Parkersburg
Area submittal.
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
60089
TABLE 1—2002 BASE YEAR INVENTORY—WEST VIRGINIA PORTION OF PARKERSBURG AREA IN TONS PER YEAR (TPY)
Source sector
NH3
NOX
PM10
PM2.5
SO2
VOC
Point .........................................................
Area ..........................................................
Nonroad ...................................................
Onroad .....................................................
Biogenic ...................................................
52
117
1
86
N/A
21,835
749
2,506
2,667
99
1,769
5,005
130
62
N/A
1,068
1,139
120
44
N/A
70,293
1,311
134
111
N/A
1,162
3,859
1,138
1,956
10,252
Total ..................................................
255
27,856
6,966
2,372
71,849
18,368
The CAA section 172(c)(3) emissions
inventory is developed by the
incorporation of data from multiple
sources. States were required to develop
and submit to EPA a triennial emissions
inventory according to the Consolidated
Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) for all
source categories (i.e., point, area,
nonroad mobile and on-road mobile).
The review and evaluation of the
methods used for the emissions
inventory submitted by West Virginia
are found in the Technical Support
Document dated June 16, 2010,
available online at www.regulations.gov,
Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0077.
EPA finds that the process used to
develop this emissions inventory for the
Parkersburg Area is adequate to meet
the requirements of CAA section
172(c)(3), the implementing regulations,
and EPA guidance for emission
inventories.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the 2002
base year emissions inventory portion of
the SIP revision submitted by the State
of West Virginia on September 9, 2008
for the Parkersburg Area. We have made
the determination that this action is
consistent with section 110 of the CAA.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Oct 01, 2012
Jkt 229001
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
pertaining to the PM2.5 2002 base year
emissions inventory portion of the West
Virginia SIP for the Parkersburg Area,
does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 13, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012–24244 Filed 10–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0371; FRL–9735–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware, New Jersey, and
Pennsylvania; Determination of
Attainment of the 2006 24-Hour Fine
Particulate Standard for the
Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to make a
determination of attainment regarding
the Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE
fine particulate (PM2.5) nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as ‘‘the
Philadelphia Area’’ or ‘‘the Area’’). EPA
is proposing to determine that the
Philadelphia Area has attained the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS), based upon
complete, quality-assured and certified
ambient air monitoring data for the
2008–2010 and 2009–2011 periods and
upon preliminary data available to date
for 2012. If EPA finalizes this proposed
determination of attainment, the
requirements for the Area to submit an
attainment demonstration and
associated reasonably available control
measures (RACM), a reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan, contingency
measures, and other planning State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
related to the attainment of the standard
shall be suspended for so long as the
Area continues to attain the 2006 24SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 2, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60087-60089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24244]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0077; FRL-9735-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; The 2002 Base Year Inventory for the Parkersburg Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) 2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the
West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of West Virginia, through the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection (WVDEP), on September 9, 2008 for the
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as the Parkersburg Area or Area). The emissions inventory is part of
the West Virginia September 9, 2008 SIP revision that was submitted to
meet nonattainment requirements related to West Virginia's portion of
the Parkersburg Area for the 1997 PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) SIP. EPA is proposing to approve the 2002 base
year PM2.5 emissions inventory for the Parkersburg Area in
accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2010-0077 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: mastro.donna@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0140, Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
[[Page 60088]]
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2010-0077. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE., Charleston,
West Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Throughout this document, whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is
used, we mean EPA. On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA promulgated the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, including an annual standard of 15.0
micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\) based on a 3-year average of
annual mean PM2.5 concentrations, and a 24-hour (or daily)
standard of 65 [micro]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations. EPA established the standards
based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating
that serious health effects are associated with exposures to
PM2.5.
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required
by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining
or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in
section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. In 1999, EPA and state air quality
agencies initiated the monitoring process for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS and, by January 2001, established a complete set of air quality
monitors. On January 5, 2005, EPA promulgated initial air quality
designations for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS (70 FR 944), which
became effective on April 5, 2005, based on air quality monitoring data
for calendar years 2001-03.
On April 14, 2005, EPA promulgated a supplemental rule amending the
agency's initial designations (70 FR 19844), with the same effective
date (April 5, 2005) at 70 FR 944. As a result of this supplemental
rule, PM2.5 nonattainment designations are in effect for 39
areas, comprising 208 counties within 20 states (and the District of
Columbia) nationwide, with a combined population of approximately 88
million. The Parkersburg Area, which is the subject of this rulemaking,
was included in the list of areas not attaining the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS. The West Virginia portion of the Parkersburg
Area consists of Wood County and the Grant Tax District of Pleasants
County.
On November 20, 2009 (74 FR 60199), EPA determined that West
Virginia had attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Parkersburg Area. That determination was based on complete, quality-
assured, quality-controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data
for the 2006-2008 three-year period that showed the area attained the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and continues to attain the standard. The
November 20, 2009 determination suspended the requirements for West
Virginia to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably
available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan,
contingency measures, and other planning SIP revisions related to
attainment of the standard for so long as the nonattainment area
continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. Section 172(c)(3) of
the CAA requires submission and approval of a comprehensive, accurate,
and current inventory of actual emissions. This proposed approval is
limited to the emissions inventory for the Parkersburg Area. Separate
action will be taken on the remainder of West Virginia's SIP submittal.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The 2002 base year emission inventory submitted by WVDEP on
September 9, 2008 for the Parkersburg Area includes emissions estimates
that cover the general source categories of point sources, non-road
mobile sources, area sources, on-road mobile sources, and biogenic
sources. The pollutants that comprise the inventory are nitrogen oxides
(NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PM2.5,
coarse particles (PM10), ammonia (NH3) and sulfur
dioxide (SO2). EPA has reviewed the results, procedures and
methodologies for the base year emissions inventory submitted by WVDEP.
The year 2002 was selected by WVDEP as the base year for the emissions
inventory per 40 CFR 51.1008(b). A discussion of the emissions
inventory development as well as the emissions inventory for the
Parkersburg Area can be found in Appendices C and D of the September 9,
2008 SIP submittal.
Table 1, below, provides a summary of the annual 2002 emissions of
NOX, VOCs, PM2.5, PM10, NH3
and SO2 for the West Virginia portion of the Parkersburg
Area submittal.
[[Page 60089]]
Table 1--2002 Base Year Inventory--West Virginia Portion of Parkersburg Area in Tons per Year (tpy)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source sector NH3 NOX PM10 PM2.5 SO2 VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point................................................... 52 21,835 1,769 1,068 70,293 1,162
Area.................................................... 117 749 5,005 1,139 1,311 3,859
Nonroad................................................. 1 2,506 130 120 134 1,138
Onroad.................................................. 86 2,667 62 44 111 1,956
Biogenic................................................ N/A 99 N/A N/A N/A 10,252
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... 255 27,856 6,966 2,372 71,849 18,368
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAA section 172(c)(3) emissions inventory is developed by the
incorporation of data from multiple sources. States were required to
develop and submit to EPA a triennial emissions inventory according to
the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) for all source
categories (i.e., point, area, nonroad mobile and on-road mobile). The
review and evaluation of the methods used for the emissions inventory
submitted by West Virginia are found in the Technical Support Document
dated June 16, 2010, available online at www.regulations.gov, Docket
No. EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0077. EPA finds that the process used to develop
this emissions inventory for the Parkersburg Area is adequate to meet
the requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3), the implementing
regulations, and EPA guidance for emission inventories.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the 2002 base year emissions inventory
portion of the SIP revision submitted by the State of West Virginia on
September 9, 2008 for the Parkersburg Area. We have made the
determination that this action is consistent with section 110 of the
CAA. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, pertaining to the PM2.5
2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the West Virginia SIP for
the Parkersburg Area, does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 13, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-24244 Filed 10-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
