John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge at Tinicum, DE and Philadelphia Counties, PA; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact, 59962-59963 [2012-24046]
Download as PDF
59962
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Applicant: James Wood, Katy, TX; PRT–
85358A
II. Background
Brenda Tapia,
Program Analyst/Data Administrator, Branch
of Permits, Division of Management
Authority.
To help us carry out our conservation
responsibilities for affected species, and
in consideration of section 10(a)(1)(A) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), along
with Executive Order 13576,
‘‘Delivering an Efficient, Effective, and
Accountable Government,’’ and the
President’s Memorandum for the Heads
of Executive Departments and Agencies
of January 21, 2009—Transparency and
Open Government (74 FR 4685; January
26, 2009), which call on all Federal
agencies to promote openness and
transparency in Government by
disclosing information to the public, we
invite public comment on these permit
applications before final action is taken.
III. Permit Applications
A. Endangered Species
Applicant: Kimberly Stewart (Ross
University School of Veterinary
Medicine) in collaboration with the
Georgia Sea Turtle Center, Jekyll
Island, GA; PRT–77898A
Multiple Applicants
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The following applicants each request
a permit to import the sport-hunted
trophy of one male bontebok
(Damaliscus pygargus pygargus) culled
from a captive herd maintained under
the management program of the
Republic of South Africa, for the
purpose of enhancement of the survival
of the species.
Applicant: John Panettiere, Atlanta, GA;
PRT–85524A
Applicant: John Deford, Long Valley, NJ;
PRT–84244A
Applicant: Rian Burkes, Hibbing, MN;
PRT–83627A
Applicant: Charles Campisi, Maspeth,
NY; PRT–83519A
Applicant: Randal Easley, Clovis, CA;
PRT–85002A
Applicant: Paul Maddison, Richmond,
TX; PRT–83806A
Applicant: Allan Spina, Long Valley, NJ;
PRT–85523A
Applicant: Edward Hopkins,
Henderson, NV; PRT–83025A
16:48 Sep 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–R–2012–N145; BAC–4311–K9–S3]
John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge at
Tinicum, DE and Philadelphia
Counties, PA; Final Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Finding of No
Significant Impact
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for John
Heinz National Wildlife Refuge at
Tinicum (John Heinz NWR, refuge) in
Delaware and Philadelphia Counties,
Pennsylvania. In this final CCP, we
describe how we will manage the refuge
for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the final CCP and FONSI by
any of the following methods. You may
request a hard copy or a CD–ROM.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the document at https://www.fws.gov/
northeast/planning/John%20Heinz/
ccphome.html.
Email: Send requests to
northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include
‘‘John Heinz NWR Final CCP’’ in the
subject line of your email.
Mail: Lia McLaughlin, Natural
Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center
Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
Fax: Attention: Lia McLaughlin, 413–
253–8468.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call
(215) 365–3118 to make an appointment
(necessary for view/pickup only) during
regular business hours at 8601
Lindbergh Blvd., Philadelphia, PA
19153.
SUMMARY:
The applicant requests a permit to
import biological specimens from
hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys
imbricata) from the wild in St. Kitts,
West Indies, for the purpose of scientific
research on the nutritional health of this
species.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[FR Doc. 2012–24094 Filed 9–28–12; 8:45 am]
Gary
Stolz, Refuge Manager, phone: (215)
365–3118, or Lia McLaughlin, Planning
Team Leader, phone: 413–253–8575;
email: northeastplanning@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for John Heinz NWR. We started
this process through a notice of intent
in the Federal Register (75 FR 25285) on
May 7, 2010. We released the draft CCP/
environmental assessment (EA) to the
public, announcing and requesting
comments in a notice of availability in
the Federal Register (77 FR 16854) on
March 22, 2012.
The refuge was established in 1972 to
preserve and restore the natural area
known as Tinicum Marsh, to promote
environmental education, and to afford
visitors an opportunity to study wildlife
in its natural habitat. It is located in
Delaware and Philadelphia Counties,
along the Delaware River, in
southeastern Pennsylvania. Currently,
the refuge includes 993 acres of
freshwater tidal marsh, open water,
grassland, and forest habitat. It is an
important migratory stopover for birds
along the Atlantic Flyway, and provides
habitat for State-listed threatened and
endangered species such as the eastern
redbelly turtle (Pseudemys rubriventris).
The refuge also offers unique
opportunities for environmental
education and interpretation in an
urban setting.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the final
CCP for John Heinz NWR in accordance
with National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
requirements. We completed a thorough
analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which we included in the
draft CCP/EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering John Heinz NWR for
the next 15 years. Alternative B, as
described for the refuge in the draft
CCP/EA, and with the modifications
described below, is the foundation for
the final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each NWR. The purpose for developing
a CCP is to provide refuge managers
with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System (NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including the
Selected Alternative
Our draft CCP/EA addressed several
key issues. To address these issues and
develop a plan based on the refuge’s
establishing purposes, vision, and goals,
we evaluated three alternatives for John
Heinz NWR in the draft CCP/EA. The
draft CCP/EA describes each alternative
in detail and relates them to the issues
and concerns that arose during the
planning process. Below, we provide
summaries for the three John Heinz
NWR alternatives evaluated in the draft
CCP/EA.
Management Alternatives
Alternative A (Current Management)
Alternative A (current management)
satisfies the National Environmental
Policy Act (40 CFR 1506.6(b))
requirement of a ‘‘No Action’’
alternative, which we define as
‘‘continuing current management.’’ It
describes our existing management
priorities and activities, and serves as a
baseline for comparing and contrasting
alternatives B and C. It would maintain
our present levels of approved refuge
staffing and the biological and visitor
programs now in place. We would
continue to focus on providing native
tidal marsh habitat for migrating and
nesting wading birds; wintering
marshbirds, waterfowl, and shorebirds;
and other wildlife. We would also
continue to actively control invasive
species, manage grassland habitats, and
maintain dikes and water levels in the
impoundment. Our environmental
education program would continue to
focus on providing training for teachers
so they could guide field trips on refuge
property.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative B (Focus on Environmental
Education for Urban Youth)
This is the Service-preferred
alternative. It combines the actions we
believe would best achieve the refuge’s
purposes, vision, and goals, and the
intent of NWRS policy on Biological
Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental
Health (601 FW 3). This alternative
would also best respond to the issues
that arose during the planning process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Sep 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
Under alternative B, we would
expand our freshwater tidal marsh
restoration efforts, implement additional
forest habitat restoration and
management efforts, and increase
monitoring efforts for species and for
climate change effects. Our
environmental education program
would focus on expanding staff-led and
volunteer-led programs for urban youth.
We would also develop environmental
education programs that focus on this
audience, and work to develop longterm relationships with schools and
school districts. We would work to
expand environmental interpretation
opportunities and infrastructure on the
refuge as well.
Alternative C
Alternative C would focus on
restoring degraded forests and
converting specific grassland areas to
shrubland habitat. As in alternative B,
we would emphasize invasive species
management, freshwater tidal marsh
restoration, and monitoring for climate
change adaptation. However, under
alternative C, we would delay much of
these efforts to more fully assess the
potential effects of climate change and
propose restoring all of the
impoundment to tidal marsh. Under
alternative C, environmental
educational programming would
concentrate on providing high school
and college-level programs focused on
encouraging and training the next
generation of conservation professionals
and environmentally concerned
citizens. We would also focus on
playing a more regional role in
conservation efforts.
We solicited comments on the draft
CCP/EA for John Heinz NWR from
March 22 to April 23, 2012 (77 FR
16854). During the comment period, we
received 19 sets of responses including
comments from public meetings, a
phone call, electronic mail, and letters.
We evaluated all of the substantive
comments we received, and include a
summary of those comments, and our
responses to them, as appendix K in the
final CCP.
Selected Alternative
We have selected alternative B for
implementation, with the following
modifications:
• We highlighted that we will be
working closely with the Philadelphia
International Airport to assess any
wildlife hazards prior to implementing
any wetland restoration under objective
1.1 in chapter 4.
Frm 00076
• We incorporated updated
information on species provided by the
Pennsylvania Fish and Boat
Commission into section 3.3 of chapter
3 and section 2.5 of appendix C.
• We added the following strategy to
objective 2.1 in chapter 4: ‘‘Work with
partners to identify and obtain resources
to replace the water control system in
the impoundment.’’
• We modified the bicycling
compatibility determination in
appendix B to open one additional trail
to bicycling.
• We corrected all format and
typographical errors that were brought
to our attention.
We have selected alternative B to
implement for John Heinz NWR, with
these minor changes, for several
reasons. Alternative B comprises a mix
of actions that, in our professional
judgment, work best towards achieving
the refuge’s purposes, vision, and goals,
NWRS policies, and the goals of other
State and regional conservation plans.
We also believe that alternative B most
effectively addresses key issues raised
during the planning process. The basis
of our decision is detailed in the FONSI
(appendix L in the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP,
including the FONSI, as indicated under
ADDRESSES.
Dated: August 27, 2012.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–24046 Filed 9–28–12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Comments
PO 00000
59963
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Preliminary Plan for Distribution of
Judgment Funds to the Loyal
Mdewakantons
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of hearings and request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Interior is developing a plan for
distribution of judgment funds to the
Loyal Mdewakantons if funds are
appropriated in satisfaction of a final
judgment. The distribution plan
includes a determination of the criteria
for eligibility to participate in any
award.
DATES: Comments on the preliminary
plan must be received by November 1,
2012. The Department will hold inperson hearings on the preliminary plan
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 190 (Monday, October 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59962-59963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24046]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R5-R-2012-N145; BAC-4311-K9-S3]
John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge at Tinicum, DE and
Philadelphia Counties, PA; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for John Heinz National
Wildlife Refuge at Tinicum (John Heinz NWR, refuge) in Delaware and
Philadelphia Counties, Pennsylvania. In this final CCP, we describe how
we will manage the refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the final CCP and FONSI by
any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or a CD-ROM.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the document at https://www.fws.gov/northeast/planning/John%20Heinz/ccphome.html.
Email: Send requests to northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include ``John
Heinz NWR Final CCP'' in the subject line of your email.
Mail: Lia McLaughlin, Natural Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
Fax: Attention: Lia McLaughlin, 413-253-8468.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call (215) 365-3118 to make an
appointment (necessary for view/pickup only) during regular business
hours at 8601 Lindbergh Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19153.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Stolz, Refuge Manager, phone:
(215) 365-3118, or Lia McLaughlin, Planning Team Leader, phone: 413-
253-8575; email: northeastplanning@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for John Heinz NWR.
We started this process through a notice of intent in the Federal
Register (75 FR 25285) on May 7, 2010. We released the draft CCP/
environmental assessment (EA) to the public, announcing and requesting
comments in a notice of availability in the Federal Register (77 FR
16854) on March 22, 2012.
The refuge was established in 1972 to preserve and restore the
natural area known as Tinicum Marsh, to promote environmental
education, and to afford visitors an opportunity to study wildlife in
its natural habitat. It is located in Delaware and Philadelphia
Counties, along the Delaware River, in southeastern Pennsylvania.
Currently, the refuge includes 993 acres of freshwater tidal marsh,
open water, grassland, and forest habitat. It is an important migratory
stopover for birds along the Atlantic Flyway, and provides habitat for
State-listed threatened and endangered species such as the eastern
redbelly turtle (Pseudemys rubriventris). The refuge also offers unique
opportunities for environmental education and interpretation in an
urban setting.
We announce our decision and the availability of the Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the final CCP for John Heinz NWR in
accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) requirements. We completed a thorough analysis of impacts
on the human environment, which we included in the draft CCP/EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering John Heinz NWR
for the next 15 years. Alternative B, as described for the refuge in
the draft CCP/EA, and with the modifications described below, is the
foundation for the final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop
a CCP for each NWR. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide
refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and
[[Page 59963]]
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration
Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including the Selected Alternative
Our draft CCP/EA addressed several key issues. To address these
issues and develop a plan based on the refuge's establishing purposes,
vision, and goals, we evaluated three alternatives for John Heinz NWR
in the draft CCP/EA. The draft CCP/EA describes each alternative in
detail and relates them to the issues and concerns that arose during
the planning process. Below, we provide summaries for the three John
Heinz NWR alternatives evaluated in the draft CCP/EA.
Management Alternatives
Alternative A (Current Management)
Alternative A (current management) satisfies the National
Environmental Policy Act (40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirement of a ``No
Action'' alternative, which we define as ``continuing current
management.'' It describes our existing management priorities and
activities, and serves as a baseline for comparing and contrasting
alternatives B and C. It would maintain our present levels of approved
refuge staffing and the biological and visitor programs now in place.
We would continue to focus on providing native tidal marsh habitat for
migrating and nesting wading birds; wintering marshbirds, waterfowl,
and shorebirds; and other wildlife. We would also continue to actively
control invasive species, manage grassland habitats, and maintain dikes
and water levels in the impoundment. Our environmental education
program would continue to focus on providing training for teachers so
they could guide field trips on refuge property.
Alternative B (Focus on Environmental Education for Urban Youth)
This is the Service-preferred alternative. It combines the actions
we believe would best achieve the refuge's purposes, vision, and goals,
and the intent of NWRS policy on Biological Integrity, Diversity, and
Environmental Health (601 FW 3). This alternative would also best
respond to the issues that arose during the planning process.
Under alternative B, we would expand our freshwater tidal marsh
restoration efforts, implement additional forest habitat restoration
and management efforts, and increase monitoring efforts for species and
for climate change effects. Our environmental education program would
focus on expanding staff-led and volunteer-led programs for urban
youth. We would also develop environmental education programs that
focus on this audience, and work to develop long-term relationships
with schools and school districts. We would work to expand
environmental interpretation opportunities and infrastructure on the
refuge as well.
Alternative C
Alternative C would focus on restoring degraded forests and
converting specific grassland areas to shrubland habitat. As in
alternative B, we would emphasize invasive species management,
freshwater tidal marsh restoration, and monitoring for climate change
adaptation. However, under alternative C, we would delay much of these
efforts to more fully assess the potential effects of climate change
and propose restoring all of the impoundment to tidal marsh. Under
alternative C, environmental educational programming would concentrate
on providing high school and college-level programs focused on
encouraging and training the next generation of conservation
professionals and environmentally concerned citizens. We would also
focus on playing a more regional role in conservation efforts.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft CCP/EA for John Heinz NWR from
March 22 to April 23, 2012 (77 FR 16854). During the comment period, we
received 19 sets of responses including comments from public meetings,
a phone call, electronic mail, and letters. We evaluated all of the
substantive comments we received, and include a summary of those
comments, and our responses to them, as appendix K in the final CCP.
Selected Alternative
We have selected alternative B for implementation, with the
following modifications:
We highlighted that we will be working closely with the
Philadelphia International Airport to assess any wildlife hazards prior
to implementing any wetland restoration under objective 1.1 in chapter
4.
We incorporated updated information on species provided by
the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission into section 3.3 of chapter 3
and section 2.5 of appendix C.
We added the following strategy to objective 2.1 in
chapter 4: ``Work with partners to identify and obtain resources to
replace the water control system in the impoundment.''
We modified the bicycling compatibility determination in
appendix B to open one additional trail to bicycling.
We corrected all format and typographical errors that were
brought to our attention.
We have selected alternative B to implement for John Heinz NWR,
with these minor changes, for several reasons. Alternative B comprises
a mix of actions that, in our professional judgment, work best towards
achieving the refuge's purposes, vision, and goals, NWRS policies, and
the goals of other State and regional conservation plans. We also
believe that alternative B most effectively addresses key issues raised
during the planning process. The basis of our decision is detailed in
the FONSI (appendix L in the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP, including the FONSI, as
indicated under ADDRESSES.
Dated: August 27, 2012.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-24046 Filed 9-28-12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P