Great Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Rockingham County, NH; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact, 59412-59414 [2012-23799]
Download as PDF
59412
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
Ending
date
Beginning date
020178
020180
020182
010183
070183
010185
070185
010186
070186
010187
100187
010188
040188
100188
040189
100189
040191
010192
040192
100192
070194
100194
040195
070195
040196
070196
040198
010199
040199
040100
040101
070101
010102
010103
100103
040104
070104
100104
040105
100105
070106
010108
040108
070108
100108
010109
040109
010111
040111
100111
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
Dated: September 21, 2012.
David V. Aguilar,
Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
013180
013182
123182
063083
123184
063085
123185
063086
123186
093087
123187
033188
093088
033189
093089
033191
123191
033192
093092
063094
093094
033195
063095
033196
063096
033198
123198
033199
033100
033101
063001
123101
123102
093003
033104
063004
093004
033105
093005
063006
123107
033108
063008
093008
123108
033109
123110
033111
093011
123112
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–R–2012–N126; BAC–4311–K9–S3]
[FR Doc. 2012–23822 Filed 9–26–12; 8:45 am]
Great Bay National Wildlife Refuge,
Rockingham County, NH; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Finding of No Significant Impact
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the final comprehensive
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Underpayments
(percent)
6
12
20
16
11
13
11
10
9
9
10
11
10
11
12
11
10
9
8
7
8
9
10
9
8
9
8
7
8
9
8
7
6
5
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
7
6
5
6
5
4
3
4
3
Overpayments
(percent)
6
12
20
16
11
13
11
10
9
8
9
10
9
10
11
10
9
8
7
6
7
8
9
8
7
8
7
7
8
9
8
7
6
5
4
5
4
5
6
7
8
7
6
5
6
5
4
3
4
3
Corporate
overpayments
(eff. 1–1–99)
(percent)
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
6
7
8
7
6
5
4
3
4
3
4
5
6
7
6
5
4
5
4
3
2
3
2
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for Great
Bay National Wildlife Refuge (NWR,
refuge) in Newington, New Hampshire,
which includes the Karner blue
butterfly conservation easement in
Concord, New Hampshire. Great Bay
NWR is administered by Parker River
NWR in Newburyport, Massachusetts.
In this final CCP, we describe how we
will manage the refuge and Karner blue
butterfly conservation easement for the
next 15 years.
You may view or obtain
copies of the final CCP and FONSI by
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
any of the following methods. You may
request a hard copy or a CD–ROM.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the document at https://www.fws.gov/
northeast/planning/Great%20bay/
ccphome.html.
Email: Send requests to
northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Great Bay Refuge CCP’’ in the subject
line of your email.
Mail: Nancy McGarigal, Natural
Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center
Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
Fax: Attention: Nancy McGarigal,
413–253–8468.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call
978–465–5753 to make an appointment
during regular business hours at the
Parker River NWR office, 6 Plum Island
Turnpike, Newburyport, MA 01950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Graham Taylor, Refuge Manager, Parker
River NWR, 6 Plum Island Turnpike,
Newburyport, MA 01950; 978–465–5753
(phone); 978–465–2807 (fax);
fw5rw_prnwr@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Great Bay NWR. We started
this process through a notice of intent
in the Federal Register (74 FR 28722) on
June 17, 2009. We announced the
release of the draft CCP/environmental
assessment (EA) to the public and
requested comments in a notice of
availability in the Federal Register (77
FR 7176) on February 10, 2012.
The Service established Great Bay
NWR in 1992 to protect the natural
diversity of fish, wildlife, and plants
within its boundaries, protect federally
listed species, preserve and enhance
water quality and aquatic habitats, and
fulfill the United State’s international
treaty obligations relating to fish and
wildlife resources. The refuge is located
in the town of Newington in
southeastern New Hampshire, on the
eastern shore of the tidally influenced
Great Bay Estuary. Prior to its
establishment, refuge lands were part of
the former Pease Air Force Base. The
1,103-acre refuge is the largest parcel of
protected land on Great Bay Estuary,
and includes a rich diversity of habitat
types including oak-hickory forests,
grasslands, shrub thickets, freshwater
and saltwater wetlands, open water, and
rocky shoreline.
Great Bay NWR also includes the
Karner blue butterfly conservation
easement in Concord, New Hampshire.
The 29-acre conservation easement is
managed for the federally endangered
Karner blue butterfly, and also supports
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
59413
other rare moths and butterflies. It
primarily consists of a mix of open pitch
pine/scrub oak, pine-hardwood, and
other shrubland habitat.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the FONSI for the final
CCP for Great Bay NWR in accordance
with National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
requirements. We completed a thorough
analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which we included in the
draft CCP/EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering Great Bay NWR for
the next 15 years. Alternative B, as
described for the refuge in the draft
CCP/EA, and with the modifications
described below, is the foundation for
the final CCP.
evaluated three alternatives for Great
Bay NWR in the draft CCP/EA. These
alternatives have some actions in
common, such as controlling invasive
species, monitoring wildlife diseases,
protecting the rocky shore, reducing
impacts from climate change, protecting
cultural resources, and distributing
refuge revenue sharing payments to the
town of Newington, New Hampshire.
There are other actions that differ
among the alternatives. The draft CCP/
EA describes each alternative in detail
and relates them to the issues and
concerns that arose during the planning
process. Below, we provide summaries
for the three Great Bay alternatives
evaluated in the draft CCP/EA.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–68ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each NWR. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing to the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years,
in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
Alternative A (Current Management)
CCP Alternatives, Including the
Selected Alternative
Our draft CCP/EA (77 FR 7176)
addressed several key issues, including:
• Managing a diversity of habitat
types, including grasslands, shrublands,
wetlands, and forest to benefit Federal
and State species of concern.
• Protecting the water quality of the
Great Bay Estuary.
• Providing more public access
opportunities on Great Bay NWR.
• Balancing the protection of historic
resources with wildlife and habitat
conservation.
To address these issues and develop
a plan based on the refuge’s establishing
purposes, vision, and goals, we
This is the Service-preferred
alternative. It combines the actions we
believe would best achieve the refuge’s
purposes, vision, and goals, and is
consistent with the intent of NWRS
policy on Biological Integrity, Diversity,
and Environmental Health (601 FW 3).
This alternative would also best respond
to the issues that arose during the
planning process.
Alternative B would improve our
management of refuge habitats to benefit
species of conservation concern in the
Great Bay area and coastal New
Hampshire. In particular, we would
emphasize habitat for priority species
such as migratory waterfowl, wading
birds, forest-dependent songbirds, New
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Management Alternatives
This alternative is the ‘‘No Action’’
alternative required by NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.). It describes our current
management activities, including those
planned, funded, or underway, and
serves as the baseline against which to
compare alternatives B and C.
Alternative A would continue to
emphasize our current biological
program priorities, including
maintaining impoundments for
migratory birds and managing
grasslands for grassland-dependent
species of concern. The refuge would
remain unstaffed and we would
continue to rely on volunteers to help
with seasonal activities. Our visitor
services program would continue to
focus on wildlife observation and
photography, and we would continue to
provide a 2-day fall deer hunt. On the
Karner blue butterfly easement, we
would continue to actively manage
habitat for Karner blue butterflies in
partnership with New Hampshire Fish
and Game (NHFG).
Alternative B (Habitat Diversity and
Focal Species Emphasis)
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
59414
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
England cottontails, and forest bats. We
would also manage estuarine and
aquatic species of concern, including
shellfish and migratory fish. We would
also remove the Lower Peverly Pond
Dam to restore approximately 1,100 feet
of stream habitat, while maintaining the
dams at Upper Peverly Pond and Stubbs
Pond to benefit a range of fish and
wildlife species of conservation
concern. We would also expand our
conservation, research, and management
partnerships to help restore and
conserve the Great Bay estuarine
ecosystem.
This alternative would enhance our
visitor services programs. We would
improve our trails, create new
interpretive materials, expand on the
existing volunteer program, and offer
visitors more opportunities to learn
about the refuge’s history, its resources,
and its surrounding area. We would also
evaluate an expansion of hunting
opportunities to include wild turkey
and a fall bow season for deer. These
expanded programs would be possible
through increased staffing and a new
refuge headquarters/visitor contact
facility.
On the Karner blue butterfly
easement, we would enhance our
partnership with NHFG to help manage
habitat on the easement to support this
species’ recovery. We would also
expand the easement’s visitor services
program by installing new interpretive
signs and trails, offering guided walks,
and updating our Web site.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Alternative C (Emphasis on Natural
Processes)
Alternative C primarily relies on
ecosystem processes, such as natural
disturbances, to affect the diversity and
integrity of refuge habitats. In particular,
we would no longer maintain much of
the grasslands and shrublands on the
refuge, allowing them to naturally
transition to forest. We would remove
all three of the refuge’s impoundments
on Peverly Brook and restore these areas
to native stream habitat. We would also
expand our visitor services program by
creating new trails and opening up more
of the refuge to public use. Under this
alternative, management of the Karner
blue butterfly easement would be
similar to alternative B.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft
CCP/EA for Great Bay NWR from
February 10 to March 19, 2012 (77 FR
7176). During the comment period, we
received 25 written responses. We
evaluated all of the substantive
comments we received, and include a
summary of those comments and our
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
responses to them, as appendix K in the
final CCP.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we
received on our draft CCP/EA, we have
made several minor changes to
alternative B, including adding or
revising several management strategies.
These changes are described in the
FONSI (appendix L in the final CCP)
and in our response to public comments
(appendix K in the final CCP).
We have selected alternative B to
implement for Great Bay NWR, with
these minor changes, for several
reasons. Alternative B comprises a mix
of actions that, in our professional
judgment, work best towards achieving
the refuge’s purposes, vision, and goals,
NWRS policies, and the goals of other
State and regional conservation plans.
We also believe that alternative B most
effectively addresses key issues raised
during the planning process. The basis
of our decision is detailed in the FONSI
(appendix L in the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP,
including the FONSI, as indicated under
ADDRESSES.
Dated: August 29, 2012.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–23799 Filed 9–26–12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2012–N177; FF08E00000–
FXES11120800000F2–123–F2]
Application From Marys River Ranch,
Elko County, NV, for an Enhancement
of Survival Permit; Safe Harbor
Agreement
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Notice of availability and
receipt of application.
ACTION:
In response to an application
from Marys River Ranch (applicant), the
Fish and Wildlife Service (we, the
Service) is considering issuance of an
enhancement of survival permit
pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). The enhancement of
survival permit application includes a
proposed safe harbor agreement (SHA)
between the applicant and the Service.
The proposed SHA provides for
voluntary habitat restoration,
maintenance, or enhancement activities
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to facilitate the repatriation and
recovery of Lahontan cutthroat within
the enrolled property. The proposed
duration of both the SHA and permit is
50 years. The Service has made a
preliminary determination that the
proposed SHA and permit application
are eligible for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The basis for
this determination is contained in an
environmental action statement, which
also is available for public review.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by 5 p.m. on October 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Edward D. Koch, State
Supervisor, by U.S. mail; or hand
delivered to the Nevada Fish and
Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1340 Financial Boulevard,
Suite 234, Reno, NV 89502; or faxed to
775–861–6301 (for further information
and instructions on the reviewing and
commenting process, see Availability of
Documents section below).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chad Mellison, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, at the address shown above or
by telephone at 775–861–6300. If you
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf, please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
Individuals wishing copies of the
permit application, the environmental
action statement, or the full text of the
proposed SHA, including a map of the
proposed permit area, references, and
description of the proposed permit area,
should contact the office and personnel
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Documents also will be available for
public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at this
office (see ADDRESSES).
Background Information
Under a safe harbor agreement,
participating landowners voluntarily
undertake management activities on
their property to enhance, restore, or
maintain habitat benefiting species
listed under the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). Safe harbor agreements, and the
subsequent enhancement of survival
permits that are issued pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA,
encourage private and other non-Federal
property owners to implement
conservation efforts for listed species by
assuring property owners that they will
not be subjected to increased property
use restrictions as a result of their efforts
to attract listed species to their property,
or to increase the numbers or
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59412-59414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23799]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R5-R-2012-N126; BAC-4311-K9-S3]
Great Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Rockingham County, NH; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for Great Bay National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR, refuge) in Newington, New Hampshire, which
includes the Karner blue butterfly conservation easement in Concord,
New Hampshire. Great Bay NWR is administered by Parker River NWR in
Newburyport, Massachusetts. In this final CCP, we describe how we will
manage the refuge and Karner blue butterfly conservation easement for
the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the final CCP and FONSI by
[[Page 59413]]
any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or a CD-ROM.
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the document at https://www.fws.gov/northeast/planning/Great%20bay/ccphome.html.
Email: Send requests to northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include ``Great
Bay Refuge CCP'' in the subject line of your email.
Mail: Nancy McGarigal, Natural Resource Planner, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035.
Fax: Attention: Nancy McGarigal, 413-253-8468.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call 978-465-5753 to make an
appointment during regular business hours at the Parker River NWR
office, 6 Plum Island Turnpike, Newburyport, MA 01950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Graham Taylor, Refuge Manager, Parker
River NWR, 6 Plum Island Turnpike, Newburyport, MA 01950; 978-465-5753
(phone); 978-465-2807 (fax); fw5rw_prnwr@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for Great Bay NWR. We
started this process through a notice of intent in the Federal Register
(74 FR 28722) on June 17, 2009. We announced the release of the draft
CCP/environmental assessment (EA) to the public and requested comments
in a notice of availability in the Federal Register (77 FR 7176) on
February 10, 2012.
The Service established Great Bay NWR in 1992 to protect the
natural diversity of fish, wildlife, and plants within its boundaries,
protect federally listed species, preserve and enhance water quality
and aquatic habitats, and fulfill the United State's international
treaty obligations relating to fish and wildlife resources. The refuge
is located in the town of Newington in southeastern New Hampshire, on
the eastern shore of the tidally influenced Great Bay Estuary. Prior to
its establishment, refuge lands were part of the former Pease Air Force
Base. The 1,103-acre refuge is the largest parcel of protected land on
Great Bay Estuary, and includes a rich diversity of habitat types
including oak-hickory forests, grasslands, shrub thickets, freshwater
and saltwater wetlands, open water, and rocky shoreline.
Great Bay NWR also includes the Karner blue butterfly conservation
easement in Concord, New Hampshire. The 29-acre conservation easement
is managed for the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly, and also
supports other rare moths and butterflies. It primarily consists of a
mix of open pitch pine/scrub oak, pine-hardwood, and other shrubland
habitat.
We announce our decision and the availability of the FONSI for the
final CCP for Great Bay NWR in accordance with National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requirements. We completed a
thorough analysis of impacts on the human environment, which we
included in the draft CCP/EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering Great Bay NWR
for the next 15 years. Alternative B, as described for the refuge in
the draft CCP/EA, and with the modifications described below, is the
foundation for the final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-68ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each NWR. The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing to the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years, in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including the Selected Alternative
Our draft CCP/EA (77 FR 7176) addressed several key issues,
including:
Managing a diversity of habitat types, including
grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, and forest to benefit Federal and
State species of concern.
Protecting the water quality of the Great Bay Estuary.
Providing more public access opportunities on Great Bay
NWR.
Balancing the protection of historic resources with
wildlife and habitat conservation.
To address these issues and develop a plan based on the refuge's
establishing purposes, vision, and goals, we evaluated three
alternatives for Great Bay NWR in the draft CCP/EA. These alternatives
have some actions in common, such as controlling invasive species,
monitoring wildlife diseases, protecting the rocky shore, reducing
impacts from climate change, protecting cultural resources, and
distributing refuge revenue sharing payments to the town of Newington,
New Hampshire. There are other actions that differ among the
alternatives. The draft CCP/EA describes each alternative in detail and
relates them to the issues and concerns that arose during the planning
process. Below, we provide summaries for the three Great Bay
alternatives evaluated in the draft CCP/EA.
Management Alternatives
Alternative A (Current Management)
This alternative is the ``No Action'' alternative required by NEPA
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). It describes our current management
activities, including those planned, funded, or underway, and serves as
the baseline against which to compare alternatives B and C. Alternative
A would continue to emphasize our current biological program
priorities, including maintaining impoundments for migratory birds and
managing grasslands for grassland-dependent species of concern. The
refuge would remain unstaffed and we would continue to rely on
volunteers to help with seasonal activities. Our visitor services
program would continue to focus on wildlife observation and
photography, and we would continue to provide a 2-day fall deer hunt.
On the Karner blue butterfly easement, we would continue to actively
manage habitat for Karner blue butterflies in partnership with New
Hampshire Fish and Game (NHFG).
Alternative B (Habitat Diversity and Focal Species Emphasis)
This is the Service-preferred alternative. It combines the actions
we believe would best achieve the refuge's purposes, vision, and goals,
and is consistent with the intent of NWRS policy on Biological
Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental Health (601 FW 3). This
alternative would also best respond to the issues that arose during the
planning process.
Alternative B would improve our management of refuge habitats to
benefit species of conservation concern in the Great Bay area and
coastal New Hampshire. In particular, we would emphasize habitat for
priority species such as migratory waterfowl, wading birds, forest-
dependent songbirds, New
[[Page 59414]]
England cottontails, and forest bats. We would also manage estuarine
and aquatic species of concern, including shellfish and migratory fish.
We would also remove the Lower Peverly Pond Dam to restore
approximately 1,100 feet of stream habitat, while maintaining the dams
at Upper Peverly Pond and Stubbs Pond to benefit a range of fish and
wildlife species of conservation concern. We would also expand our
conservation, research, and management partnerships to help restore and
conserve the Great Bay estuarine ecosystem.
This alternative would enhance our visitor services programs. We
would improve our trails, create new interpretive materials, expand on
the existing volunteer program, and offer visitors more opportunities
to learn about the refuge's history, its resources, and its surrounding
area. We would also evaluate an expansion of hunting opportunities to
include wild turkey and a fall bow season for deer. These expanded
programs would be possible through increased staffing and a new refuge
headquarters/visitor contact facility.
On the Karner blue butterfly easement, we would enhance our
partnership with NHFG to help manage habitat on the easement to support
this species' recovery. We would also expand the easement's visitor
services program by installing new interpretive signs and trails,
offering guided walks, and updating our Web site.
Alternative C (Emphasis on Natural Processes)
Alternative C primarily relies on ecosystem processes, such as
natural disturbances, to affect the diversity and integrity of refuge
habitats. In particular, we would no longer maintain much of the
grasslands and shrublands on the refuge, allowing them to naturally
transition to forest. We would remove all three of the refuge's
impoundments on Peverly Brook and restore these areas to native stream
habitat. We would also expand our visitor services program by creating
new trails and opening up more of the refuge to public use. Under this
alternative, management of the Karner blue butterfly easement would be
similar to alternative B.
Comments
We solicited comments on the draft CCP/EA for Great Bay NWR from
February 10 to March 19, 2012 (77 FR 7176). During the comment period,
we received 25 written responses. We evaluated all of the substantive
comments we received, and include a summary of those comments and our
responses to them, as appendix K in the final CCP.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we received on our draft CCP/EA, we
have made several minor changes to alternative B, including adding or
revising several management strategies. These changes are described in
the FONSI (appendix L in the final CCP) and in our response to public
comments (appendix K in the final CCP).
We have selected alternative B to implement for Great Bay NWR, with
these minor changes, for several reasons. Alternative B comprises a mix
of actions that, in our professional judgment, work best towards
achieving the refuge's purposes, vision, and goals, NWRS policies, and
the goals of other State and regional conservation plans. We also
believe that alternative B most effectively addresses key issues raised
during the planning process. The basis of our decision is detailed in
the FONSI (appendix L in the final CCP).
Public Availability of Documents
You can view or obtain the final CCP, including the FONSI, as
indicated under ADDRESSES.
Dated: August 29, 2012.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-23799 Filed 9-26-12; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P