Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, 59452-59453 [2012-23745]
Download as PDF
59452
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
not involve environmental issues,2
formal expressions of intent to file an
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),3 and
trail use/rail banking requests under 49
CFR 1152.29 must be filed by October
9, 2012. Petitions to reopen or requests
for public use conditions under 49 CFR
1152.28 must be filed by October 17,
2012, with the Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001.
A copy of any petition filed with the
Board should be sent to Pickens’
representative: Rose-Michele Nardi,
Weiner Brodsky Sidman Kider PC, 1300
19th Street, NW., Fifth Floor,
Washington, DC 20036–1609.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio.
Pickens has filed a combined
environmental and historic report that
addresses the effects, if any, of the
abandonment on the environment and
historic resources. OEA will issue an
environmental assessment (EA) by
October 2, 2012. Interested persons may
obtain a copy of the EA by writing to
OEA (Room 1100, Surface
Transportation Board, Washington, DC
20423–0001) or by calling OEA at (202)
245–0305. Assistance for the hearing
impaired is available through the
Federal Information Relay Service at
(800) 877–8339. Comments on
environmental and historic preservation
matters must be filed within 15 days
after the EA becomes available to the
public.
Environmental, historic preservation,
public use, or trail use/rail banking
conditions will be imposed, where
appropriate, in a subsequent decision.
Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR
1152.29(e)(2), Pickens shall file a notice
of consummation with the Board to
signify that it has exercised the
authority granted and fully abandoned
the line. If consummation has not been
effected by Picken’s filing of a notice of
consummation by September 27, 2013,
and there are no legal or regulatory
barriers to consummation, the authority
to abandon will automatically expire.
2 The Board will grant a stay if an informed
decision on environmental issues (whether raised
by a party or by the Board’s Office of Environmental
Analysis (OEA) in its independent investigation)
cannot be made before the exemption’s effective
date. See Exemption of Out-of-Serv. Rail Lines, 5
I.C.C. 2d 377 (1989). Any request for a stay should
be filed as soon as possible so that the Board may
take appropriate action before the exemption’s
effective date.
3 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing
fee, which currently is set at $1,600. See
Regulations Governing Fees for Servs. Performed in
Connection with Licensing & Related Servs.—2012
Update, EP 542 (Sub-No. 20) (STB served July 27,
2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at
www.stb.dot.gov.
By the Board.
Decided: September 19, 2012.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012–23757 Filed 9–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Information
Collection; Submission for OMB
Review
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
The OCC, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on a continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OCC is soliciting comment
concerning its information collection
titled, ‘‘Identity Theft Red Flags and
Address Discrepancies under the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of
2003.’’ The OCC also is giving notice
that it is sending the collection to OMB
for review.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Communications Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Mailstop 2–3, Attention:
1557–0237, 250 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. In addition,
comments may be sent by fax to (202)
874–5274 or by electronic mail to
regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You may
personally inspect and photocopy
comments at the OCC, 250 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. For security
reasons, the OCC requires that visitors
make an appointment to inspect
comments. You may do so by calling
(202) 874–4700. Upon arrival, visitors
will be required to present valid
government-issued photo identification
and to submit to security screening in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
order to inspect and photocopy
comments.
Additionally, please send a copy of
your comments by mail to: OCC Desk
Officer, 1557–0237, U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW., #10235, Washington, DC
20503, or by fax to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
can request additional information or a
copy of the collection from Mary H.
Gottlieb, (202) 874–5090, Legislative
and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, 250 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There
have been no changes to the
requirements of the regulations;
however, certain sections of the
regulations have been transferred to the
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (CFPB) pursuant to title X of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act, Public Law
111–203, 124 Stat. 1955, July 21, 2010
(Dodd-Frank Act), and republished as
CFPB regulations (76 FR 79308
(December 21, 2011)). The transferred
regulations, which relate to address
discrepancies, previously were found at
12 CFR 41.82, and have now been
moved to 12 CFR 1022.82. The burden
estimates for this portion of the
collection have been revised to remove
the burden attributable to OCCregulated institutions with over $10
billion in total assets, now carried by
CFPB pursuant to section 1025 of the
Dodd-Frank Act. The OCC retains
enforcement authority under 12 CFR
1022.82 for those institutions under its
supervision with total assets of $10
billion or less.
Title: Identity Theft Red Flags and
Address Discrepancies under the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of
2003.
OMB Control No.: 1557–0237.
Description: Section 114 of the FACT
Act amended section 615 of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to require
the Agencies 1 to issue jointly:
• Guidelines for financial institutions
and creditors regarding identity theft
with respect to their account holders
and customers. In developing the
guidelines, the Agencies were required
to identify patterns, practices, and
1 Section 114 required regulations to be issued
jointly by the Federal banking agencies, the
National Credit Union Administration and the
Federal Trade Commission. Therefore, for purposes
of this filing, ‘‘Agencies’’ refers to these entities. It
is important to note that Section 1088(a)(8) of the
Dodd-Frank Act further amended section 615 of
FCRA to also require the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to issue Red Flags Rules.
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 188 / Thursday, September 27, 2012 / Notices
specific forms of activity that indicate
the possible existence of identity theft.
The guidelines must be updated as often
as necessary, and must be consistent
with the policies and procedures
required under section 326 of the USA
PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. 5318(l).
• Regulations requiring each financial
institution and each creditor to establish
reasonable policies and procedures for
implementing the guidelines in order to
identify possible risks to account
holders or customers or to the safety and
soundness of the institution or creditor.
• Regulations generally requiring
credit and debit card issuers to assess
the validity of change of address
requests under certain circumstances.
Section 315 of the FACT Act also
amended section 605 of the FCRA to
require the Agencies to issue regulations
providing guidance regarding what
reasonable policies and procedures a
user of consumer reports must have in
place and employ when a user receives
a notice of address discrepancy from a
consumer reporting agency (CRA).2
These regulations are required to
describe reasonable policies and
procedures for users of consumer
reports to:
• Enable a user to form a reasonable
belief that it knows the identity of the
person for whom it has obtained a
consumer report, and
• Reconcile the address of the
consumer with the CRA, if the user
establishes a continuing relationship
with the consumer and regularly and, in
the ordinary course of business,
furnishes information to the CRA.
As required by section 114 of the
FACT Act, appendix J to 12 CFR part 41
contains guidelines for financial
institutions and creditors to use in
identifying patterns, practices, and
specific forms of activity that indicate
the possible existence of identity theft.
In addition, 12 CFR 41.90 requires each
financial institution or creditor that is a
national bank, Federal branch or agency
of a foreign bank, and any of their
operating subsidiaries that are not
functionally regulated, to establish
reasonable policies and procedures to
address the risk of identity theft that
incorporate the guidelines. Pursuant to
§ 41.91, credit card and debit card
issuers must implement reasonable
policies and procedures to assess the
validity of a request for a change of
address under certain circumstances.
Section 41.90 requires each OCCregulated financial institution or
creditor that offers or maintains one or
more covered accounts to develop and
2 As noted above, these regulations have been
transferred to the CFPB.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Sep 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
implement a written Identity Theft
Prevention Program (Program). In
developing the Program, financial
institutions and creditors are required to
consider the guidelines in appendix J
and include the suggested provisions as
appropriate. The initial Program must
be approved by the institution’s board of
directors or an appropriate committee
thereof. The board, an appropriate
committee thereof, or a designated
employee at the level of senior
management must be involved in the
oversight of the Program. In addition,
staff members must be trained to carry
out the Program. Pursuant to § 41.91,
each credit and debit card issuer is
required to establish and implement
policies and procedures to assess the
validity of a change of address request
if it is followed by a request for an
additional or replacement card. Before
issuing the additional or replacement
card, the card issuer must notify the
cardholder of the request and provide
the cardholder a reasonable means to
report incorrect address changes or use
another means to assess the validity of
the change of address.
As required by section 315 of the
FACT Act, § 1022.82 requires users of
consumer reports to have in place
reasonable policies and procedures that
must be followed when a user receives
a notice of address discrepancy from a
credit reporting agency (CRA).
Section 1022.82 requires each user of
consumer reports to develop and
implement reasonable policies and
procedures designed to enable the user
to form a reasonable belief that a
consumer report relates to the consumer
about whom it requested the report
when it receives a notice of address
discrepancy from a CRA. A user of
consumer reports also must develop and
implement reasonable policies and
procedures for furnishing an address for
the consumer that the user has
reasonably confirmed to be accurate to
the CRA from which it receives a notice
of address discrepancy when the user
can: (1) Form a reasonable belief that the
consumer report relates to the consumer
about whom the user has requested the
report; (2) establish a continuing
relationship with the consumer and; (3)
establish that it regularly and in the
ordinary course of business furnishes
information to the CRA from which it
received the notice of address
discrepancy.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals;
Businesses or other for-profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,010.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59453
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
223,860 hours.
This collection was published for 60
days of comment on May 25, 2012. 77
FR 31439. No comments were received.
Comments continue to be invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
OCC, including whether the information
has practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the OCC’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Dated: September 19, 2012.
Michele Meyer,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–23745 Filed 9–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Regulation Project
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is
soliciting comments concerning
distributions of stock and stock rights.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before November 26,
2012 to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Yvette Lawrence, Internal Revenue
Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the regulation should be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59452-59453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23745]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Information
Collection; Submission for OMB Review
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The OCC, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to comment on a continuing
information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not
required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OCC is soliciting comment
concerning its information collection titled, ``Identity Theft Red
Flags and Address Discrepancies under the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act of 2003.'' The OCC also is giving notice that it is
sending the collection to OMB for review.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Communications Division, Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Mailstop 2-3, Attention: 1557-0237, 250 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. In addition, comments may be sent by fax to (202)
874-5274 or by electronic mail to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You may
personally inspect and photocopy comments at the OCC, 250 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. For security reasons, the OCC requires that
visitors make an appointment to inspect comments. You may do so by
calling (202) 874-4700. Upon arrival, visitors will be required to
present valid government-issued photo identification and to submit to
security screening in order to inspect and photocopy comments.
Additionally, please send a copy of your comments by mail to: OCC
Desk Officer, 1557-0237, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW., 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to (202)
395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You can request additional information
or a copy of the collection from Mary H. Gottlieb, (202) 874-5090,
Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There have been no changes to the
requirements of the regulations; however, certain sections of the
regulations have been transferred to the Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (CFPB) pursuant to title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1955,
July 21, 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), and republished as CFPB regulations (76
FR 79308 (December 21, 2011)). The transferred regulations, which
relate to address discrepancies, previously were found at 12 CFR 41.82,
and have now been moved to 12 CFR 1022.82. The burden estimates for
this portion of the collection have been revised to remove the burden
attributable to OCC-regulated institutions with over $10 billion in
total assets, now carried by CFPB pursuant to section 1025 of the Dodd-
Frank Act. The OCC retains enforcement authority under 12 CFR 1022.82
for those institutions under its supervision with total assets of $10
billion or less.
Title: Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies under the
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003.
OMB Control No.: 1557-0237.
Description: Section 114 of the FACT Act amended section 615 of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to require the Agencies \1\ to issue
jointly:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 114 required regulations to be issued jointly by the
Federal banking agencies, the National Credit Union Administration
and the Federal Trade Commission. Therefore, for purposes of this
filing, ``Agencies'' refers to these entities. It is important to
note that Section 1088(a)(8) of the Dodd-Frank Act further amended
section 615 of FCRA to also require the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to issue Red
Flags Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guidelines for financial institutions and creditors
regarding identity theft with respect to their account holders and
customers. In developing the guidelines, the Agencies were required to
identify patterns, practices, and
[[Page 59453]]
specific forms of activity that indicate the possible existence of
identity theft. The guidelines must be updated as often as necessary,
and must be consistent with the policies and procedures required under
section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. 5318(l).
Regulations requiring each financial institution and each
creditor to establish reasonable policies and procedures for
implementing the guidelines in order to identify possible risks to
account holders or customers or to the safety and soundness of the
institution or creditor.
Regulations generally requiring credit and debit card
issuers to assess the validity of change of address requests under
certain circumstances.
Section 315 of the FACT Act also amended section 605 of the FCRA to
require the Agencies to issue regulations providing guidance regarding
what reasonable policies and procedures a user of consumer reports must
have in place and employ when a user receives a notice of address
discrepancy from a consumer reporting agency (CRA).\2\ These
regulations are required to describe reasonable policies and procedures
for users of consumer reports to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As noted above, these regulations have been transferred to
the CFPB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable a user to form a reasonable belief that it knows
the identity of the person for whom it has obtained a consumer report,
and
Reconcile the address of the consumer with the CRA, if the
user establishes a continuing relationship with the consumer and
regularly and, in the ordinary course of business, furnishes
information to the CRA.
As required by section 114 of the FACT Act, appendix J to 12 CFR
part 41 contains guidelines for financial institutions and creditors to
use in identifying patterns, practices, and specific forms of activity
that indicate the possible existence of identity theft. In addition, 12
CFR 41.90 requires each financial institution or creditor that is a
national bank, Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank, and any of
their operating subsidiaries that are not functionally regulated, to
establish reasonable policies and procedures to address the risk of
identity theft that incorporate the guidelines. Pursuant to Sec.
41.91, credit card and debit card issuers must implement reasonable
policies and procedures to assess the validity of a request for a
change of address under certain circumstances.
Section 41.90 requires each OCC-regulated financial institution or
creditor that offers or maintains one or more covered accounts to
develop and implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program
(Program). In developing the Program, financial institutions and
creditors are required to consider the guidelines in appendix J and
include the suggested provisions as appropriate. The initial Program
must be approved by the institution's board of directors or an
appropriate committee thereof. The board, an appropriate committee
thereof, or a designated employee at the level of senior management
must be involved in the oversight of the Program. In addition, staff
members must be trained to carry out the Program. Pursuant to Sec.
41.91, each credit and debit card issuer is required to establish and
implement policies and procedures to assess the validity of a change of
address request if it is followed by a request for an additional or
replacement card. Before issuing the additional or replacement card,
the card issuer must notify the cardholder of the request and provide
the cardholder a reasonable means to report incorrect address changes
or use another means to assess the validity of the change of address.
As required by section 315 of the FACT Act, Sec. 1022.82 requires
users of consumer reports to have in place reasonable policies and
procedures that must be followed when a user receives a notice of
address discrepancy from a credit reporting agency (CRA).
Section 1022.82 requires each user of consumer reports to develop
and implement reasonable policies and procedures designed to enable the
user to form a reasonable belief that a consumer report relates to the
consumer about whom it requested the report when it receives a notice
of address discrepancy from a CRA. A user of consumer reports also must
develop and implement reasonable policies and procedures for furnishing
an address for the consumer that the user has reasonably confirmed to
be accurate to the CRA from which it receives a notice of address
discrepancy when the user can: (1) Form a reasonable belief that the
consumer report relates to the consumer about whom the user has
requested the report; (2) establish a continuing relationship with the
consumer and; (3) establish that it regularly and in the ordinary
course of business furnishes information to the CRA from which it
received the notice of address discrepancy.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals; Businesses or other for-profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,010.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 223,860 hours.
This collection was published for 60 days of comment on May 25,
2012. 77 FR 31439. No comments were received. Comments continue to be
invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the OCC, including whether the
information has practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the OCC's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Dated: September 19, 2012.
Michele Meyer,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-23745 Filed 9-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P