Presidential Determination on Major Illicit Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2013, 58915-58919 [2012-23640]
Download as PDF
Vol. 77
Monday,
No. 185
September 24, 2012
Part II
The President
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Presidential Determination No. 2012–15 of September 14, 2012—
Presidential Determination on Major Illicit Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug
Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2013
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\24SEO0.SGM
24SEO0
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\24SEO0.SGM
24SEO0
58917
Presidential Documents
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 185
Monday, September 24, 2012
Title 3—
Presidential Determination No. 2012–15 of September 14, 2012
The President
Presidential Determination on Major Illicit Drug Transit or
Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2013
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
Pursuant to section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal
Year 2003 (Public Law 107–228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following
countries as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug producing countries:
Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras,
India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
A country’s presence on the majors list is not necessarily an adverse reflection
of its government’s counternarcotics efforts or level of cooperation with
the United States. Consistent with the statutory definition of a major drug
transit or drug producing country set forth in section 481(e)(2) and (5)
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), one of the reasons
major drug transit or illicit drug producing countries are placed on the
list is the combination of geographic, commercial, and economic factors
that allow drugs to transit or be produced, even if a government has carried
out stringent narcotics control law enforcement measures.
Pursuant to section 706(2)(A) of the FRAA, I hereby designate Bolivia, Burma,
and Venezuela as countries that have failed demonstrably during the previous
12 months to adhere to their obligations under international counternarcotics
agreements and take the measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA.
Included in this report are justifications for the determinations on Bolivia,
Burma, and Venezuela, as required by section 706(2)(B) of the FRAA.
I have also determined, in accordance with provisions of section 706(3)(A)
of the FRAA, that support for programs to aid Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela
is vital to the national interests of the United States.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Afghanistan produces approximately 90 percent of the world’s illicit opium.
Nearly all of this cultivation occurs in four southern and western provinces.
Instability in the area allows criminal networks, insurgent groups, and illicit
cultivation and drug production to thrive. While Helmand Province continues
to be the largest poppy-cultivating area, the United States and the United
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimate that cultivation in
Helmand decreased between 35 and 39 percent, respectively, since 2008,
to roughly 63,000 hectares.
The strategic objective of Afghanistan’s Ministry of Counter Narcotics, as
stated in its National Drug Control Strategy, is ‘‘to create a secure environment
for a healthy society with a strong licit economy, through evidence-based
policy-setting, effective coordination and full accountability to the people
of Afghanistan and our government.’’ The ongoing Good Performer Initiative,
now in its sixth year, rewards provinces for successful counternarcotics
performance. In 2011, 22 of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces qualified for $19.2
million in development projects as the result of their poppy reduction efforts.
Afghanistan’s gains remain fragile. Reducing illegal cultivation and trafficking
are closely linked to broader economic opportunity, security, and the ability
of the Afghan government to project the rule of law. International support
for the Afghan National Drug Control Strategy, including from the United
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\24SEO0.SGM
24SEO0
58918
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Presidential Documents
States, is designed to bolster the country’s drug control undertakings and
is directly tied to the success of the country’s wide-ranging national objectives
to improve peace, security, and economic development.
This year, the Caribbean was examined for its relative importance as a
transit zone for illegal substances destined for U.S. markets. Without factoring
in illegal maritime and air drug smuggling believed to be destined for
Europe and beyond, approximately 5 percent of all drugs destined for the
United States are estimated to pass through the majors list countries of
The Bahamas, Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Jamaica. As traffickers constantly reorder their routes and methods, the United States and other donors
continue to believe that countering the drug trade in the Caribbean is in
our national interest, as well as that of the countries themselves. Without
the rule of law, well-run institutions, and effective drug interdiction, the
viability of the broad range of national and regional goals adopted by Caribbean countries is threatened.
European, Canadian, and U.S. bilateral drug control support, as well as
the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative, contribute to the region’s ability
to prevent and address drug trafficking and related violence and crime
in the Caribbean. Similarly, key undertakings by the Organization of American States and UNODC in the region—especially those aimed at bringing
long-term stability to Haiti—are an important part of the policy and assistance
mosaic for smaller countries seeking to build on the successes of broad
regional policies and programs.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
United States analysts estimate that approximately 95 percent of illegal
drugs cultivated and produced in South America destined for the United
States are smuggled through Central America, Mexico, and the Eastern Pacific,
primarily using maritime conveyances and illegal air flights. In response,
the United States launched the Central America Regional Security Initiative
(CARSI) in 2008, which was further expanded when I announced the Central
America Citizen Security Partnership in San Salvador in March 2011.
Through CARSI and the Partnership, the United States has focused its crime
prevention, counternarcotics, law enforcement and security assistance, and
bolstered rule of law institutions in Central America. The region also has
strengthened cooperation through the Central American Integration System
(SICA) to promote citizen security and other programs. Multilateral cooperation to stem the flow of precursor chemicals from as far away as China
that are used to produce illegal methamphetamine in Central America is
an important component of SICA’s unprecedented regional cooperation. Similar objectives are achieved through U.S. support for Mexico’s drug control
policies and programs under the Merida Initiative.
Several other countries were evaluated for inclusion in this year’s list, but
are not determined to be major drug transit and/or major illicit drug producing countries. For example, Canada has taken effective steps to stem
the flow of synthetic MDMA (ecstasy) across its shared border with the
United States, a problem of growing concern during the past several years.
The country continues its robust efforts to combat the production, distribution, and consumption of various illegal drugs. As part of its 5-year National
Anti-Drug Strategy, Canada has rolled out new initiatives specifically intended to fight the trafficking of marijuana and synthetic drugs. As detailed
in the March 2011 report on precursors by the International Narcotics Control
Board, Canada broadened its existing Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
to prohibit any person from possessing, producing, selling, or importing
material intended to be used in the illegal manufacture or trafficking of
methamphetamine or ecstasy. The United States has also collaborated with
Canada on a National Northern Border Counternarcotics Strategy that defines
in detail the wide range of initiatives underway to combat all phases of
drug trafficking. Bilateral initiatives focus on programs to stem the twoway drug trade between Canada and the United States.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\24SEO0.SGM
24SEO0
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Presidential Documents
58919
You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this determination, with
its Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela memoranda of justification, under section
706 of the FRAA, to the Congress, and publish it in the Federal Register.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 14, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2012–23640
Filed 9–21–12; 11:15 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\24SEO0.SGM
24SEO0
OB#1.EPS
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Billing code 4710–10–P
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 185 (Monday, September 24, 2012)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 58915-58919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23640]
[[Page 58915]]
Vol. 77
Monday,
No. 185
September 24, 2012
Part II
The President
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presidential Determination No. 2012-15 of September 14, 2012--
Presidential Determination on Major Illicit Drug Transit or Major
Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2013
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 77 , No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 /
Presidential Documents
___________________________________________________________________
Title 3--
The President
[[Page 58917]]
Presidential Determination No. 2012-15 of September 14,
2012
Presidential Determination on Major Illicit Drug
Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for
Fiscal Year 2013
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
Pursuant to section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-
228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following countries
as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug
producing countries: Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize,
Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican
Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti,
Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua,
Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
A country's presence on the majors list is not
necessarily an adverse reflection of its government's
counternarcotics efforts or level of cooperation with
the United States. Consistent with the statutory
definition of a major drug transit or drug producing
country set forth in section 481(e)(2) and (5) of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), one
of the reasons major drug transit or illicit drug
producing countries are placed on the list is the
combination of geographic, commercial, and economic
factors that allow drugs to transit or be produced,
even if a government has carried out stringent
narcotics control law enforcement measures.
Pursuant to section 706(2)(A) of the FRAA, I hereby
designate Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela as countries
that have failed demonstrably during the previous 12
months to adhere to their obligations under
international counternarcotics agreements and take the
measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA.
Included in this report are justifications for the
determinations on Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela, as
required by section 706(2)(B) of the FRAA.
I have also determined, in accordance with provisions
of section 706(3)(A) of the FRAA, that support for
programs to aid Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela is vital
to the national interests of the United States.
Afghanistan produces approximately 90 percent of the
world's illicit opium. Nearly all of this cultivation
occurs in four southern and western provinces.
Instability in the area allows criminal networks,
insurgent groups, and illicit cultivation and drug
production to thrive. While Helmand Province continues
to be the largest poppy-cultivating area, the United
States and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC) estimate that cultivation in Helmand decreased
between 35 and 39 percent, respectively, since 2008, to
roughly 63,000 hectares.
The strategic objective of Afghanistan's Ministry of
Counter Narcotics, as stated in its National Drug
Control Strategy, is ``to create a secure environment
for a healthy society with a strong licit economy,
through evidence-based policy-setting, effective
coordination and full accountability to the people of
Afghanistan and our government.'' The ongoing Good
Performer Initiative, now in its sixth year, rewards
provinces for successful counternarcotics performance.
In 2011, 22 of Afghanistan's 34 provinces qualified for
$19.2 million in development projects as the result of
their poppy reduction efforts.
Afghanistan's gains remain fragile. Reducing illegal
cultivation and trafficking are closely linked to
broader economic opportunity, security, and the ability
of the Afghan government to project the rule of law.
International support for the Afghan National Drug
Control Strategy, including from the United
[[Page 58918]]
States, is designed to bolster the country's drug
control undertakings and is directly tied to the
success of the country's wide-ranging national
objectives to improve peace, security, and economic
development.
This year, the Caribbean was examined for its relative
importance as a transit zone for illegal substances
destined for U.S. markets. Without factoring in illegal
maritime and air drug smuggling believed to be destined
for Europe and beyond, approximately 5 percent of all
drugs destined for the United States are estimated to
pass through the majors list countries of The Bahamas,
Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Jamaica. As traffickers
constantly reorder their routes and methods, the United
States and other donors continue to believe that
countering the drug trade in the Caribbean is in our
national interest, as well as that of the countries
themselves. Without the rule of law, well-run
institutions, and effective drug interdiction, the
viability of the broad range of national and regional
goals adopted by Caribbean countries is threatened.
European, Canadian, and U.S. bilateral drug control
support, as well as the Caribbean Basin Security
Initiative, contribute to the region's ability to
prevent and address drug trafficking and related
violence and crime in the Caribbean. Similarly, key
undertakings by the Organization of American States and
UNODC in the region--especially those aimed at bringing
long-term stability to Haiti--are an important part of
the policy and assistance mosaic for smaller countries
seeking to build on the successes of broad regional
policies and programs.
United States analysts estimate that approximately 95
percent of illegal drugs cultivated and produced in
South America destined for the United States are
smuggled through Central America, Mexico, and the
Eastern Pacific, primarily using maritime conveyances
and illegal air flights. In response, the United States
launched the Central America Regional Security
Initiative (CARSI) in 2008, which was further expanded
when I announced the Central America Citizen Security
Partnership in San Salvador in March 2011. Through
CARSI and the Partnership, the United States has
focused its crime prevention, counternarcotics, law
enforcement and security assistance, and bolstered rule
of law institutions in Central America. The region also
has strengthened cooperation through the Central
American Integration System (SICA) to promote citizen
security and other programs. Multilateral cooperation
to stem the flow of precursor chemicals from as far
away as China that are used to produce illegal
methamphetamine in Central America is an important
component of SICA's unprecedented regional cooperation.
Similar objectives are achieved through U.S. support
for Mexico's drug control policies and programs under
the Merida Initiative.
Several other countries were evaluated for inclusion in
this year's list, but are not determined to be major
drug transit and/or major illicit drug producing
countries. For example, Canada has taken effective
steps to stem the flow of synthetic MDMA (ecstasy)
across its shared border with the United States, a
problem of growing concern during the past several
years. The country continues its robust efforts to
combat the production, distribution, and consumption of
various illegal drugs. As part of its 5-year National
Anti-Drug Strategy, Canada has rolled out new
initiatives specifically intended to fight the
trafficking of marijuana and synthetic drugs. As
detailed in the March 2011 report on precursors by the
International Narcotics Control Board, Canada broadened
its existing Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to
prohibit any person from possessing, producing,
selling, or importing material intended to be used in
the illegal manufacture or trafficking of
methamphetamine or ecstasy. The United States has also
collaborated with Canada on a National Northern Border
Counternarcotics Strategy that defines in detail the
wide range of initiatives underway to combat all phases
of drug trafficking. Bilateral initiatives focus on
programs to stem the two-way drug trade between Canada
and the United States.
[[Page 58919]]
You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this
determination, with its Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela
memoranda of justification, under section 706 of the
FRAA, to the Congress, and publish it in the Federal
Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 14, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2012-23640
Filed 9-21-12; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P