J. P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corp., 58824 [2012-23424]
Download as PDF
58824
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on October 4, 2012.
Dated: September 17, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–23423 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–105–000]
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
J. P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corp. v.
California Independent System
Operator Corp.: Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on September 14,
2012, pursuant to Rule 206 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206
and section 206 of the Federal Power
Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(e), J. P. Morgan
Ventures Energy Corp. (Complainant or
JPMVEC) filed a formal complaint
against California Independent System
Operator Corp. (Respondent or CAISO)
alleging that the Respondent is violating
its tariff by underpaying the JPMVEC for
the Respondent’s Exceptional
Dispatches 1 of energy generating
resources controlled through tolling
agreements by JPMVEC and its
subsidiary BE CA LLC. The
Complainant is seeking (1) a
determination by the Commission that
CAISO’s failure to pay JPMVEC its bid
prices for Exceptional Dispatches
violated section 11.5.6 of the CAISO
tariff and (2) an order from the
Commission directing CAISO to comply
immediately with the tariff provisions
governing payment for Exceptional
Dispatches and to pay JPMVEC the full
amount owed for energy acquired
through Exceptional Dispatches, with
interest as calculated under 18 CFR
35.19a.
The Complainant certifies that copies
of the complaint were served on the
contacts for the Respondent as listed in
the Commission’s list of Corporate
Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on October 4, 2012.
Dated: September 17, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–23424 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
1 The CAISO tariff defines ‘‘Exceptional
Dispatch’’ as ‘‘a Dispatch Instruction issued for the
purposes specified in Section 34.9. Energy from
Exceptional Dispatches shall not set any Dispatch
Interval LMP.’’ CAISO tariff, App. A
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP12–520–000]
Gulf Shore Energy Partners, LP; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Assessment for the Proposed
Markham Booster Station Project and
Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of
the Markham Booster Station Project
involving construction and operation of
facilities by Gulf Shore Energy Partners,
LP (Gulf Shore) in Matagorda County,
Texas. The Commission will use this EA
in its decision-making process to
determine whether the project is in the
public convenience and necessity.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the project.
Your input will help the Commission
staff determine what issues they need to
evaluate in the EA. Please note that the
scoping period will close on October 17,
2012.
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and
local government representatives should
notify their constituents of this
proposed project and encourage them to
comment on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
proposed facilities. The company would
seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the project, that approval
conveys with it the right of eminent
domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings
where compensation would be
determined in accordance with state
law.
Gulf Shore provided landowners with
a fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’. This fact sheet addresses a
number of typically-asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the
Commission’s proceedings. It is also
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 185 (Monday, September 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 58824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23424]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL12-105-000]
J. P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corp. v. California Independent
System Operator Corp.: Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on September 14, 2012, pursuant to Rule 206 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and section 206 of the Federal Power Act,
16 U.S.C. 824(e), J. P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corp. (Complainant or
JPMVEC) filed a formal complaint against California Independent System
Operator Corp. (Respondent or CAISO) alleging that the Respondent is
violating its tariff by underpaying the JPMVEC for the Respondent's
Exceptional Dispatches \1\ of energy generating resources controlled
through tolling agreements by JPMVEC and its subsidiary BE CA LLC. The
Complainant is seeking (1) a determination by the Commission that
CAISO's failure to pay JPMVEC its bid prices for Exceptional Dispatches
violated section 11.5.6 of the CAISO tariff and (2) an order from the
Commission directing CAISO to comply immediately with the tariff
provisions governing payment for Exceptional Dispatches and to pay
JPMVEC the full amount owed for energy acquired through Exceptional
Dispatches, with interest as calculated under 18 CFR 35.19a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The CAISO tariff defines ``Exceptional Dispatch'' as ``a
Dispatch Instruction issued for the purposes specified in Section
34.9. Energy from Exceptional Dispatches shall not set any Dispatch
Interval LMP.'' CAISO tariff, App. A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts for the Respondent as listed in the Commission's list
of Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 4, 2012.
Dated: September 17, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-23424 Filed 9-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P