Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 58832-58834 [2012-23415]
Download as PDF
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58832
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
discharges from silviculture activities,
and discharges of storm water from
agricultural activities.
ODAFF has jurisdiction over all
matters affecting agriculture that have
not been expressly delegated to another
state or federal agency, as set out in the
Oklahoma Agriculture Code, and is
responsible for fully implementing and
enforcing the laws and rules within its
jurisdictional areas of environmental
responsibility. The Oklahoma
Environmental Quality Act gives
ODAFF environmental jurisdiction over
point source discharges from
agricultural crop production and
agricultural services. It also gives the
Agency environmental jurisdiction
specific to the application of pesticides.
ODAFF does not have jurisdiction over
storm water discharges associated with
industrial activity (as defined at 40 CFR
122.26(b)(14)) at facilities whose
primary industrial activity is storage of
grain, feed seed, fertilizer, and
agriculture chemicals (e.g., SIC code
4121) and are thus required by federal
regulations to have a storm water
permit. However, ODAFF’s jurisdiction
includes all discharges at facilities
regulated by ODAFF that only
incidentally store grain, feed, seed,
fertilizer, and agriculture chemicals to
support the primary activity of the
facility (e.g., feed storage at a CAFO).
ODAFF has the necessary jurisdiction to
regulate discharges resulting from
agricultural and non-agricultural
applications of pesticides; except for
discharges from industrial processes,
municipal treatment works, and
municipal and industrial storm water,
for which the Oklahoma Environmental
Quality Act has expressly delegated
jurisdiction to the Oklahoma
Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ). ODAFF also has jurisdiction to
regulate discharges resulting from
silvicultural discharges related to tree
growing, planting management, log
transport and log storage, and other
activities, except those related to wood
preservation and processing regulated
pursuant to 40 CFR part 429 (Timber
Products Processing) and part 436
(Mineral Mining and Processing), which
are regulated by ODEQ.
Activities that are not within
ODAFF’s environmental jurisdiction
include commercial manufacturers of
fertilizers, grain and feed products, and
chemicals; manufacturing of food and
kindred products, tobacco, paper,
lumber, wood, textile mill and other
agricultural products; slaughterhouses,
except for feedlots at those facilities;
and aquaculture and fish hatcheries.
These exceptions to the Agency’s
jurisdiction include, but are not limited
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
to, discharges of pollutants and storm
water to waters of the state, surface
impoundments and land application of
wastes and sludge, and other pollution
originating at these facilities.
ODAFF is not seeking authority to
regulate discharges to Indian Country,
as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. EPA
retains NPDES permitting authority and
primary enforcement responsibility over
Indian Country in the State of
Oklahoma.
B. Transfer of NPDES Authority and
Pending Actions
Upon approval of the AgPDES
program, authority for all NPDES
permitting activities, as well as primary
responsibility for NPDES enforcement
activities, within the scope of ODAFF’s
jurisdiction, would be transferred to the
State. EPA would retain on a permanent
basis its authority under section 402(d)
of the CWA to object to AgPDES permits
proposed by ODAFF, and if the
objections are not resolved, to issue
federal NPDES permits for those
discharges. EPA would also retain on a
permanent basis its authority under
sections 402(I) and 309 of the CWA to
file federal enforcement actions in those
instances in which EPA determines the
State has not taken timely or
appropriate enforcement action.
Upon program authorization, ODAFF
will take over administration and
enforcement of EPA-issued general
permits for those discharges under its
jurisdiction while EPA will retain
administration of the general permits for
those discharges remaining under EPA
jurisdiction. Dischargers remaining
under EPA jurisdiction include those
discharges to waters in Indian Country
and those discharges under the
jurisdiction of the Oklahoma
Corporation Commission. The transfer
of EPA-issued permits is described in
Section IV.B of the MOA. A Table
outlining jurisdiction over general
permits after program authorization has
been prepared and is available on EPA’s
Web site. This notice also serves as
notice that the permits will be modified
by EPA and ODAFF as necessary to
reflect the transfer of jurisdiction
pursuant to 40 CFR 123.1(d)(1) and
123.24(b)(1)(i).
I hereby provide public notice of the
application by the State of Oklahoma for
approval to administer the AgPDES
program for discharges into navigable
waters within its jurisdiction in
accordance with Section 402(b) of the
CWA and 40 CFR part 123.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: September 13, 2012.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
6.
[FR Doc. 2012–23489 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection(s) Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burden and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3502–
3520), the Federal Communications
Commission invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s).
Comments are requested concerning:
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid OMB control
number.
SUMMARY:
Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before October 24,
2012. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments
to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), via fax
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
at 202–395–5167 or via Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, via the
Internet at Judith-b.herman@fcc.gov. To
submit your PRA comments by email
send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing
Director, FCC, at 202–418–0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0233.
Title: Part 36, Separations.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 1,162
respondents; 1,582 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 22
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
quarterly and annual reporting
requirements and third party disclosure
requirements.
Obligation To Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. sections 151,
154(i), and (j), 221(c) and 410(c) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Total Annual Burden: 34,804 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
No assurances of confidentiality have
been given regarding the information.
However, respondents may request
materials or information submitted to
the Commission be withheld from
public inspection under 47 CFR 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this collection to the OMB
for approval of a revision of this
information collection.
In order to determine which carriers
are entitled to universal service support,
all rate-of-return regulated (rate-ofreturn) incumbent local exchange
carriers (LECs) must provide the
National Exchange Carrier Association
(NECA) with the loop cost and loop
count data required by 47 CFR 36.611
for each of its study areas and, if
applicable, for each wire center as that
term is defined in 47 CFR part 54 of the
Commission’s rules.
Loops are the telephone lines running
from the carrier’s switching facilities to
the customer. The loop cost and loop
count information is to be filed annually
with NECA by July 31st of each year,
and may be updated quarterly pursuant
to section 36.612. Pursuant to section
36.613, the information filed on July
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
31st of each year will be used to
calculate universal service support for
each study area and is filed by NECA
with the Commission on October 1 of
each year. An incumbent LEC is defined
as a carrier that meets the definition of
‘‘incumbent local exchange carrier’’ in
section 51.5 of the Commission’s rules.
The Commission requires that nonrural carriers submit quarterly loop
counts in order to ensure that universal
service fund (USF) support for non-rural
carriers is accurately calculated when
competitive eligible
telecommunications carriers (ETCs) are
present in the incumbent LECs’
operating areas. Quarterly loop cost and
loop count data filings are voluntary for
rate-of-return carriers.
The Commission is submitting this
collection to the OMB for approval of a
revision of this information collection.
The revision is due to the elimination of
the requirement for price-cap regulated
carriers and competitive carriers to file
cost or loop count data.
OMB Control Number: 3060–0824.
Title: Service Provider Identification
Number and Contact Form.
Form Number: FCC Form 498.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 5,000
respondents; 5,000 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.5
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirements and third party
disclosure requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. 151–154 and
254 the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Total Annual Burden: 7,500 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
The Commission notes that the
Universal Service Administrative
Company (USAC) who administers the
universal service program must preserve
the confidentiality of all data obtained
from respondents and contributors to
the universal service programs, must not
use the data except for purposes of
administering the universal service
programs, and must not disclose data in
company-specific form unless directed
to do so by the Commission. With
respect to the FCC Form 498, USAC
shall publish each participant’s name,
SPIN, and contact information via
USAC’s Web site. All other information,
including financial institution account
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58833
numbers or routing information, shall
remain confidential.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this collection to the OMB
for approval of a revision of this
information collection.
One of the functions of the Universal
Service Administrative Company
(USAC) is to provide a means for the
billing, collection and disbursement of
funds for the universal service support
mechanisms.
On October 1998, the OMB approved
FCC Form 498, the ‘‘Service Provider
Information Form’’ to enable USAC to
collect service provider name and
address, telephone number, Federal
Employer Identification Number (EIN),
contact names, contact telephone
numbers, and remittance information.
FCC Form 498 enables participants to
request a Service Provider Identification
Number (SPIN) and provides the official
record for participation in the universal
service support mechanisms. The
remittance information provided by
participants on FCC Form 498 enables
USAC to make payments to participants
in the universal service support
mechanisms.
The following proposed revisions
have been made to the FCC Form 498
for which we seek OMB approval:
• Added an additional field in block
3 for a company’s Federal Registration
Number (FRN);
• Added a column for the Study Area
Code Company Name in block 8;
• Added the ability for a carrier to
designate an alternate bank account for
the payment of BEAR funds in block 11;
• Added a box in block 1 and a
supplemental information sheet to allow
respondents to include information
about affiliates;
• Updated the Principal
Communications Types in block 14 to
include additional business types as
listed on the FCC Form 499–A; and
• Added a box after every program on
the form that will allow service
providers to cease participation in the
associated program without having to
deactivate their entire SPIN.
Corresponding adjustments were
made to the instructions to reflect the
proposed changes to the FCC Form 498.
The information collected on the FCC
Form 498 is used by USAC to disburse
federal universal service support
consistent with the specifications of
eligible participants in the universal
service programs. FCC Form 498
submissions also provide USAC with
updated contact information so that
USAC can contact universal service
fund participants when necessary.
Without such information, USAC would
not be able to distribute support to the
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
58834
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
proper entities and this would prevent
the Commission from fulfilling its
statutory responsibilities under the Act
to preserve and advance universal
service.
Federal Communications Commission.
Gloria J. Miles,
Federal Register Liaison, Office of the
Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2012–23415 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Federal Election Commission.
& TIME: Thursday, September 27,
2012 and its continuation on Tuesday,
October 2, 2012 at 10 a.m.
PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington,
DC.
STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Closed to
the Public.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
Compliance matters pursuant to 2
U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2
U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in
civil actions or proceedings or
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and
procedures or matters affecting a
particular employee.
*
*
*
*
*
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:
Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone:
(202) 694–1220.
AGENCY:
DATE
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than October 19,
2012.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street,
Richmond, Virginia 23261–4528:
1. SCBT Financial Corporation,
Columbia, South Carolina, to acquire
100 percent of the voting securities of
The Savannah Bancorp, Inc., Savannah,
Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire
The Savannah Bank, NA, Savannah,
Georgia, and Bryan Bank & Trust,
Richmond Hill, Georgia.
In connection with this application,
Applicant also has applied to acquire
Minis & Co. Inc., Savannah, Georgia,
and thereby engage in financial and
investment advisory activities, pursuant
to section 225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y.
[FR Doc. 2012–23574 Filed 9–20–12; 4:15 pm]
[FR Doc. 2012–23490 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Shelley E. Garr,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 19, 2012.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
Federal Trade Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
intends to conduct (with parental
permission) an online survey of
children, ages 8–16 years, who watch
movies, listen to music, and/or play
game applications (‘‘apps’’) on
smartphones, Internet-accessible
handheld devices, or tablet computers
(collectively ‘‘app-capable mobile
devices’’) that run either the iOS or
Android operating systems. Before
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
gathering this information, the FTC is
seeking public comments on its
proposed consumer research. Comments
will be considered before the FTC
submits a request for Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’)
review under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (‘‘PRA’’).
Comments must be received on
or before November 23, 2012.
DATES:
Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith Fentonmiller, (202) 326–2775,
Attorney, Federal Trade Commission,
Bureau of Consumer Protection,
Division of Advertising Practices, 600
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In September 2000, the Commission
issued a report requested by the
President and Congress entitled,
Marketing Violent Entertainment to
Children: A Review of Self-Regulation
and Industry Practices in the Motion
Picture, Music Recording & Electronic
Game Industries.1 The 2000 Report
examined the structure and operation of
each industry’s self-regulatory program,
parental familiarity with and use of
those systems, and whether the
industries had marketed violent
entertainment products in a manner
inconsistent with their own parental
advisories. The Commission found that
industry members routinely targeted
children in their advertising and
marketing of violent entertainment
products and that children under age 17
could purchase these products relatively
easily. The Commission called upon the
industries to strengthen their selfregulatory programs by: (1) Prohibiting
target-marketing to children and
imposing sanctions for violations; (2)
improving self-regulatory programs at
the retail level; and (3) increasing
parental awareness of the ratings and
labels.
The Commission issued follow-up
reports to assess changes in industry
practices in April 2001,2 December
1 Available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/
violence/vioreport.pdf (hereafter ‘‘2000 Report’’).
2 Available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/
violence/violence010423.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 185 (Monday, September 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58832-58834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23415]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review and Approval
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3502-3520), the Federal Communications Commission invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on the following information collection(s). Comments are requested
concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; the
accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person
shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does
not display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before October 24, 2012. If you anticipate that you
will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within
the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC
contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), via fax
[[Page 58833]]
at 202-395-5167 or via Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Judith B. Herman, Federal Communications Commission, via the
Internet at Judith-b.herman@fcc.gov. To submit your PRA comments by
email send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing
Director, FCC, at 202-418-0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0233.
Title: Part 36, Separations.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 1,162 respondents; 1,582 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 22 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion quarterly and annual reporting
requirements and third party disclosure requirements.
Obligation To Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47
U.S.C. sections 151, 154(i), and (j), 221(c) and 410(c) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 34,804 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: No assurances of
confidentiality have been given regarding the information. However,
respondents may request materials or information submitted to the
Commission be withheld from public inspection under 47 CFR 0.459 of the
Commission's rules
Needs and Uses: The Commission will submit this collection to the
OMB for approval of a revision of this information collection.
In order to determine which carriers are entitled to universal
service support, all rate-of-return regulated (rate-of-return)
incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) must provide the National
Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) with the loop cost and loop count
data required by 47 CFR 36.611 for each of its study areas and, if
applicable, for each wire center as that term is defined in 47 CFR part
54 of the Commission's rules.
Loops are the telephone lines running from the carrier's switching
facilities to the customer. The loop cost and loop count information is
to be filed annually with NECA by July 31st of each year, and may be
updated quarterly pursuant to section 36.612. Pursuant to section
36.613, the information filed on July 31st of each year will be used to
calculate universal service support for each study area and is filed by
NECA with the Commission on October 1 of each year. An incumbent LEC is
defined as a carrier that meets the definition of ``incumbent local
exchange carrier'' in section 51.5 of the Commission's rules.
The Commission requires that non-rural carriers submit quarterly
loop counts in order to ensure that universal service fund (USF)
support for non-rural carriers is accurately calculated when
competitive eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) are present in
the incumbent LECs' operating areas. Quarterly loop cost and loop count
data filings are voluntary for rate-of-return carriers.
The Commission is submitting this collection to the OMB for
approval of a revision of this information collection. The revision is
due to the elimination of the requirement for price-cap regulated
carriers and competitive carriers to file cost or loop count data.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0824.
Title: Service Provider Identification Number and Contact Form.
Form Number: FCC Form 498.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit and not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 5,000 respondents; 5,000 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.5 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirements and third
party disclosure requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47
U.S.C. 151-154 and 254 the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 7,500 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: The Commission notes that the
Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) who administers the
universal service program must preserve the confidentiality of all data
obtained from respondents and contributors to the universal service
programs, must not use the data except for purposes of administering
the universal service programs, and must not disclose data in company-
specific form unless directed to do so by the Commission. With respect
to the FCC Form 498, USAC shall publish each participant's name, SPIN,
and contact information via USAC's Web site. All other information,
including financial institution account numbers or routing information,
shall remain confidential.
Needs and Uses: The Commission will submit this collection to the
OMB for approval of a revision of this information collection.
One of the functions of the Universal Service Administrative
Company (USAC) is to provide a means for the billing, collection and
disbursement of funds for the universal service support mechanisms.
On October 1998, the OMB approved FCC Form 498, the ``Service
Provider Information Form'' to enable USAC to collect service provider
name and address, telephone number, Federal Employer Identification
Number (EIN), contact names, contact telephone numbers, and remittance
information. FCC Form 498 enables participants to request a Service
Provider Identification Number (SPIN) and provides the official record
for participation in the universal service support mechanisms. The
remittance information provided by participants on FCC Form 498 enables
USAC to make payments to participants in the universal service support
mechanisms.
The following proposed revisions have been made to the FCC Form 498
for which we seek OMB approval:
Added an additional field in block 3 for a company's
Federal Registration Number (FRN);
Added a column for the Study Area Code Company Name in
block 8;
Added the ability for a carrier to designate an alternate
bank account for the payment of BEAR funds in block 11;
Added a box in block 1 and a supplemental information
sheet to allow respondents to include information about affiliates;
Updated the Principal Communications Types in block 14 to
include additional business types as listed on the FCC Form 499-A; and
Added a box after every program on the form that will
allow service providers to cease participation in the associated
program without having to deactivate their entire SPIN.
Corresponding adjustments were made to the instructions to reflect
the proposed changes to the FCC Form 498.
The information collected on the FCC Form 498 is used by USAC to
disburse federal universal service support consistent with the
specifications of eligible participants in the universal service
programs. FCC Form 498 submissions also provide USAC with updated
contact information so that USAC can contact universal service fund
participants when necessary. Without such information, USAC would not
be able to distribute support to the
[[Page 58834]]
proper entities and this would prevent the Commission from fulfilling
its statutory responsibilities under the Act to preserve and advance
universal service.
Federal Communications Commission.
Gloria J. Miles,
Federal Register Liaison, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing
Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-23415 Filed 9-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P