Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 58845-58847 [2012-23191]
Download as PDF
58845
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Type of respondents
Organization
Number of
respondents
Form name
Number of
responses per
respondent
Avg. burden/
response
Physicians and Medical Students .....
........................
Training of Trainers Participants/Regional State Training Partners/Advisory Committee Members.
........................
ID and Treatment of FASD 6-mo F/
U, QUALTRICS online 6-Mo Follow-up.
FASD
ComprehensivePre,
QUALTRICS online Comprehensive Pre.
FASD
Comprehensive
Post,
QUALTRICS online Comprehensive Post.
FASD Comprehensive 6-mo F/U,
QUALTRICS online Comprehensive 6-Mo Follow-up.
Clinical Experience A .......................
Clinical Experience B .......................
Key Informant Interview ...................
........................
........................
Key Informant Interview ...................
Key Informant Interview ...................
Harvard Minute Feedback ...............
Training Activity Reporting (TARF) ..
15
10
100
180
1
1
1
1
20/60
15/60
1/60
2/60
Midwest RTC
Knowledge Pre ................................
1080
1
7/60
Knowledge Post, 3 mo F/U .............
Event Eval ........................................
Continuing Education Event, Pre ....
Continuing Education Event, Post ...
Continuing Education Event, 3 mo
Follow-up.
Modified Index Pre, 3 mo online F/U
Utilization of FAS/FASD Curriculum
Pre, 3 mo online F/U.
FASD Pre .........................................
1080
1110
250
250
250
2
1
1
1
1
7/60
5/60
5/60
5/60
5/60
75
50
2
2
10/60
5/60
500
1
10/60
FASD Post .......................................
FASD 3 Mo Follow-up .....................
500
300
1
1
15/60
10/60
Training of Trainer Participants ........
Staff and Training of Trainer Graduates.
Academic Faculty/Health Professionals/Professionals/Health Profession Students.
Health Professionals .........................
........................
Academic Faculty .............................
........................
Medical and allied health students
and residents.
Southeast RTC
Dated: September 13, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office
of the Associate Director for Science, Office
of the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–23048 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[60Day–12–12SG]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 and
send comments to Kimberly S. Lane,
CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 1600
Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA
30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
258
1
8/60
220
1
15/60
220
1
20/60
204
1
15/60
25
25
16
1
1
1
5/60
5/60
15/60
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Human Systems Integration Design
Guidelines (MinerFirst) for Improved
Mine Worker Safety—New—National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
NIOSH, under Public Law 91–173 as
amended by Public Law 95–164
(Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977), and Public Law 109–236 (Mine
Improvement and New Emergency
Response Act of 2006) has the
responsibility to conduct research to
improve working conditions and to
prevent accidents and occupational
diseases in underground coal and metal/
nonmetal mines in the U.S.
Mining remains one of the most
dangerous occupations in the United
States. Despite continued efforts in
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
58846
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
research and regulation, tragedies like
Upper Big Branch (2010) and Sago
(2006) highlight the need for additional
work that focuses on the human
component also known as human
systems integration (HSI). HSI
incorporates the needs of any human
interaction within the system into the
design process to optimize both safety
and efficiency of the system. The use of
HSI in the acquisition cycle is
commonplace in other industries (e.g.,
the defense and aerospace industries).
As an example, the Army has developed
guidelines, called MANPRINT, which
require all devices to meet standards for
usability, wearability, and acceptability.
The mining industry currently lacks a
similar set of guidelines to ensure both
usability by the miner and increased
safety of the working environment.
With the adoption of the MINER Act
of 2006 as well as health and safety
initiatives (End Black Lung Campaign),
the mining industry has begun to
mandate the increased use of safety
devices by mineworkers (wireless
communication systems, personal dust
monitor, and proximity detection).
These devices offer attractive health and
safety benefits—improved tracking and
communication, real time monitoring of
respirable dust levels, and the
prevention of accidental crushing by
large mobile machinery. However, while
the benefits of such wearable devices
are easy to understand within their own
context, they inevitably increase both
the physical and cognitive burden
placed on the mine worker who must
carry, interact with, and ultimately
make decisions with each one of the
devices. The physical burden is evident,
but the cognitive effect may not be as
clear.
Currently, it is unknown how the
increased physical and cognitive load
that is being placed on today’s mine
workers will affect their health and
safety. A first step to determining this
impact is to understand a miner’s job
from the perspective of the miner. This
research project will use an HSI
approach to answer a series of questions
because HSI is based on the
understanding that people are the
critical elements within systems and
adopting a human-centric perspective of
specifically what information miners
believe is necessary for them to
understand and interact with their
surroundings and to safely complete
their jobs. The research questionnaire
will also be used to determine what
information miners currently have
available to them, how information is
delivered to them, in what format they
would like to receive information, and
the benefit they see in having
information. An additional 30
underground miners will take part in
focus groups. Questions similar to those
included on the research questionnaire
will be asked during the focus groups.
The goal of using this research method
is to collect more in depth information
about the topic from a smaller number
of participants. In addition, a Fatigue
Risk Management Systems Assessment
Tool will be administered to no more
than 50 mine personnel familiar with
the mines concerns regarding fatigue as
well as the fatigue risk management
program that may be in use. The results
of phase I and phase II will be used to
formulate a portion of the initial draft of
mining specific Human Systems
Integration (HSI) guidelines.
In phase III the experimental research
strategy will be used to test usability,
changes in cognitive workload, and
situational awareness. A series of
experiments will be conducted to
evaluate how the mine specific HSI
guidelines impact the aforementioned
constructs. Specific hypotheses will be
formulated after phases one and two
have been completed. Both
underground coal miners and NIOSH
employees will be invited to participate
in these experiments, which will take
place at the NIOSH Bruceton, PA
research facility. It is anticipated that
each experimental session will last
approximately one hour.
The information collected from
miners and NIOSH employees to answer
these key questions will facilitate the
development of mining specific HSI
guidelines which are necessary for the
planning, development and testing of
products to be used by miners. There is
no cost to respondents other than their
time.
systems increases productivity and
safety, while decreasing costs
(Tvaryanas, 2006). The goal of this
project is to determine: (1) What
information is critical for a miner to
safely perform his job, (2) what
processes (e.g., expertise, decision
making, attention, etc.) are necessary for
a miner to effectively perform his job,
and (3) how do the miner and the
machine interact.
This is a multiphase research project.
There will be three phases of data
collection. Several data collection tools
and research methods will be used in
each phase of data collection.
In phase I, NIOSH researchers will
observe between 10 and 20 underground
coal miners while the miners are
performing their jobs. The goal of this
research method is to observe the tasks
and subtasks that occur while specific
jobs within the mine are performed to
determine which tasks and subtasks are
the most challenging for the miner.
Researchers will keep observation notes,
and if possible, ask miners questions
while they are working. As the second
part of phase I, an additional 10–20
underground miners will be asked to
take part in a task/cognitive task
analysis. During this task, miners will
be asked to sequentially describe the
steps taken to perform their job. This
task will not be completed while the
miner is performing his job, but will be
described from memory. The
underground miners who participate in
the direct observation task and task/
cognitive task analyses will all be
considered experts at their positions,
and the positions they work will be
those that either rely on the use of
energized equipment (e.g., Continuous
Miner Operator) or are currently
responsible for atmospheric and
environmental monitoring (e.g., Fire
Boss). Each direct observation session
will take no longer than 4 hours, and
each task/cognitive task analysis will
take approximately two hours to
complete.
In phase II of this research, a 30
minute research questionnaire will be
administered to no more than 150
underground coal miners. The research
questionnaire is designed to assess
situational awareness or more
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
Phase I Miners ..................................
Phase I Miners ..................................
Phase II Miners .................................
Task/Cognitive Task Analyses .........
Direct Observation ...........................
Research Questionnaire ..................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
20
20
150
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
1
1
1
24SEN1
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
2
4
30/60
Total burden
(hours)
40
80
75
58847
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 185 / Monday, September 24, 2012 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
Total burden
(hours)
Type of respondents
Form name
Phase II Mine Safety Personnel .......
50
1
1
50
Phase II Miners .................................
Phase III Miners ................................
Fatigue Risk Management Systems
Assessment Tool.
Focus Groups ...................................
Experimental Research Studies .......
30
20
1
1
1
1
30
20
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
295
Dated: September 14, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office
of the Associate Director for Science, Office
of the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–23191 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Dated: September 14, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2012–23455 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Advisory Committee to the Director
(ACD), Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC)
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the CDC announces
the following meeting of the
aforementioned committee:
Time and Date: 2 p.m.–4 p.m. (EDT),
Thursday, October 25, 2012.
Place: Teleconference.
Status: Open to the public, limited only by
the availability of telephone ports. The
public is welcome to participate during the
public comment period. The public comment
period is tentatively scheduled for 3:50 p.m.–
3:55 p.m. To participate in the
teleconference, please dial (877) 930–8819
and enter code 1579739.
Purpose: The committee will provide
advice to the CDC Director on policy and
broad strategies that will enable CDC to fulfill
its mission of protecting health through
health promotion, prevention, and
preparedness.
Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items
will include the following updates from the
Global Workgroup; updates from the State,
Tribal, Local and Territorial Workgroup; and
Ethics Subcommittee, as well as an update
from the CDC Director.
The agenda is subject to change as
priorities dictate.
Contact Person for More Information:
Carmen Villar, MSW, Designated Federal
Officer, ACD, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE.,
M/S D–14, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone
(404) 639–7000, email: GHickman@cdc.gov.
The deadline for notification of attendance is
October 19, 2012. To register for this meeting,
please send an email to ACDirector@cdc.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Sep 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
The Director, Management Analysis and
Services Office, has been delegated the
authority to sign Federal Register notices
pertaining to announcements of meetings and
other committee management activities, for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Board of Scientific Counselors,
National Center for Injury Prevention
and Control (BSC, NCIPC)
partnerships; Science Update; health
communication; global activities; Research to
Practice Agenda; and increasing
programmatic input to the BSC. There will be
15 minutes allotted for public comments at
the end of the open session.
Agenda items are subject to change as
priorities dictate.
Contact Person for More Information:
Gwendolyn H. Cattledge, Ph.D., M.S.E.H.,
Deputy Associate Director for Science,
NCIPC, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE.,
Mailstop F–63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341,
Telephone (770) 488–1430.
The Director, Management Analysis and
Services Office, has been delegated the
authority to sign Federal Register notices
pertaining to announcements of meetings and
other committee management activities, for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Dated: September 17, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L.92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
announces the following meeting of the
aforementioned board:
[FR Doc. 2012–23452 Filed 9–21–12; 8:45 am]
Times and Dates
8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., October 18, 2012.
8:30 a.m.–2 p.m., October 19, 2012.
Place: Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE.,
Building 106, Atlanta, Georgia 30341.
Status: Open to the public, limited only by
the space available.
Purpose: The Board will: (1) Conduct,
encourage, cooperate with, and assist other
appropriate public health authorities,
scientific institutions, and scientists in the
conduct of research, investigations,
experiments, demonstrations, and studies
relating to the causes, diagnosis, treatment,
control, and prevention of physical and
mental diseases, and other impairments and
(2) conduct and assist in research and control
activities related to injury.
Matters To Be Discussed: The BSC, NCIPC
will discuss the strategies and activities
needed to guide the Center’s research and
program focus. Topics to be discussed
include the Director’s Update on the budget
appropriation, reorganization and
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: CMS–846–849, 10125
and 10126]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) is publishing the
following summary of proposed
collections for public comment.
Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 185 (Monday, September 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58845-58847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23191]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-12-12SG]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects.
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570
and send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, CDC Reports Clearance Officer,
1600 Clifton Road, MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Human Systems Integration Design Guidelines (MinerFirst) for
Improved Mine Worker Safety--New--National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC).
Background and Brief Description
NIOSH, under Public Law 91-173 as amended by Public Law 95-164
(Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977), and Public Law 109-236
(Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006) has the
responsibility to conduct research to improve working conditions and to
prevent accidents and occupational diseases in underground coal and
metal/nonmetal mines in the U.S.
Mining remains one of the most dangerous occupations in the United
States. Despite continued efforts in
[[Page 58846]]
research and regulation, tragedies like Upper Big Branch (2010) and
Sago (2006) highlight the need for additional work that focuses on the
human component also known as human systems integration (HSI). HSI
incorporates the needs of any human interaction within the system into
the design process to optimize both safety and efficiency of the
system. The use of HSI in the acquisition cycle is commonplace in other
industries (e.g., the defense and aerospace industries). As an example,
the Army has developed guidelines, called MANPRINT, which require all
devices to meet standards for usability, wearability, and
acceptability. The mining industry currently lacks a similar set of
guidelines to ensure both usability by the miner and increased safety
of the working environment.
With the adoption of the MINER Act of 2006 as well as health and
safety initiatives (End Black Lung Campaign), the mining industry has
begun to mandate the increased use of safety devices by mineworkers
(wireless communication systems, personal dust monitor, and proximity
detection). These devices offer attractive health and safety benefits--
improved tracking and communication, real time monitoring of respirable
dust levels, and the prevention of accidental crushing by large mobile
machinery. However, while the benefits of such wearable devices are
easy to understand within their own context, they inevitably increase
both the physical and cognitive burden placed on the mine worker who
must carry, interact with, and ultimately make decisions with each one
of the devices. The physical burden is evident, but the cognitive
effect may not be as clear.
Currently, it is unknown how the increased physical and cognitive
load that is being placed on today's mine workers will affect their
health and safety. A first step to determining this impact is to
understand a miner's job from the perspective of the miner. This
research project will use an HSI approach to answer a series of
questions because HSI is based on the understanding that people are the
critical elements within systems and adopting a human-centric
perspective of systems increases productivity and safety, while
decreasing costs (Tvaryanas, 2006). The goal of this project is to
determine: (1) What information is critical for a miner to safely
perform his job, (2) what processes (e.g., expertise, decision making,
attention, etc.) are necessary for a miner to effectively perform his
job, and (3) how do the miner and the machine interact.
This is a multiphase research project. There will be three phases
of data collection. Several data collection tools and research methods
will be used in each phase of data collection.
In phase I, NIOSH researchers will observe between 10 and 20
underground coal miners while the miners are performing their jobs. The
goal of this research method is to observe the tasks and subtasks that
occur while specific jobs within the mine are performed to determine
which tasks and subtasks are the most challenging for the miner.
Researchers will keep observation notes, and if possible, ask miners
questions while they are working. As the second part of phase I, an
additional 10-20 underground miners will be asked to take part in a
task/cognitive task analysis. During this task, miners will be asked to
sequentially describe the steps taken to perform their job. This task
will not be completed while the miner is performing his job, but will
be described from memory. The underground miners who participate in the
direct observation task and task/cognitive task analyses will all be
considered experts at their positions, and the positions they work will
be those that either rely on the use of energized equipment (e.g.,
Continuous Miner Operator) or are currently responsible for atmospheric
and environmental monitoring (e.g., Fire Boss). Each direct observation
session will take no longer than 4 hours, and each task/cognitive task
analysis will take approximately two hours to complete.
In phase II of this research, a 30 minute research questionnaire
will be administered to no more than 150 underground coal miners. The
research questionnaire is designed to assess situational awareness or
more specifically what information miners believe is necessary for them
to understand and interact with their surroundings and to safely
complete their jobs. The research questionnaire will also be used to
determine what information miners currently have available to them, how
information is delivered to them, in what format they would like to
receive information, and the benefit they see in having information. An
additional 30 underground miners will take part in focus groups.
Questions similar to those included on the research questionnaire will
be asked during the focus groups. The goal of using this research
method is to collect more in depth information about the topic from a
smaller number of participants. In addition, a Fatigue Risk Management
Systems Assessment Tool will be administered to no more than 50 mine
personnel familiar with the mines concerns regarding fatigue as well as
the fatigue risk management program that may be in use. The results of
phase I and phase II will be used to formulate a portion of the initial
draft of mining specific Human Systems Integration (HSI) guidelines.
In phase III the experimental research strategy will be used to
test usability, changes in cognitive workload, and situational
awareness. A series of experiments will be conducted to evaluate how
the mine specific HSI guidelines impact the aforementioned constructs.
Specific hypotheses will be formulated after phases one and two have
been completed. Both underground coal miners and NIOSH employees will
be invited to participate in these experiments, which will take place
at the NIOSH Bruceton, PA research facility. It is anticipated that
each experimental session will last approximately one hour.
The information collected from miners and NIOSH employees to answer
these key questions will facilitate the development of mining specific
HSI guidelines which are necessary for the planning, development and
testing of products to be used by miners. There is no cost to
respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondents Form name Number of responses per per response Total burden
respondents respondent (hours) (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phase I Miners................ Task/Cognitive 20 1 2 40
Task Analyses.
Phase I Miners................ Direct 20 1 4 80
Observation.
Phase II Miners............... Research 150 1 30/60 75
Questionnaire.
[[Page 58847]]
Phase II Mine Safety Personnel Fatigue Risk 50 1 1 50
Management
Systems
Assessment Tool.
Phase II Miners............... Focus Groups.... 30 1 1 30
Phase III Miners.............. Experimental 20 1 1 20
Research
Studies.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ................ .............. .............. .............. 295
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 14, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate
Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-23191 Filed 9-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P