Reissuance of Nationwide Permits, 58532-58533 [2012-23388]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58532
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
required to comply with applicable
Corps requirements.
3. Alternatives. The EIS will address
an array of alternatives for providing
facilities suitable for the shipping and
receiving of dry bulk goods (grains, ore,
coal, etc.) and for handling rail traffic to
the new facility. Alternatives analyzed
during the investigation may include
but are not limited to no-action,
alternative sites, alternative methods for
shipping and handling bulk goods,
alternative facility designs, and
alternatives for the railroad spur
upgrades. Mitigation measures may
include but are not limited to avoidance
of sensitive areas, creation or
enhancement of marine macroalgae
beds, and creation, restoration, or
enhancement of wetlands.
4. Scoping Process. The scoping
period will continue for 120 days after
publication of this Notice of Intent and
will close on January 21, 2013. During
the scoping period, the Corps invites
Federal agencies, State and local
governments, Native American Tribes,
and the public to participate in the
scoping process either by providing
written comments or by attending the
public scoping meetings scheduled at
the time and location indicated below.
Written comments will be considered in
the preparation of the Draft EIS.
Comments postmarked or received by
email after the specified date will be
considered to the extent feasible.
The purpose of scoping is to assist the
Corps in defining issues, public
concerns, and alternatives and the depth
to which they will be evaluated in the
EIS. The Corps has prepared project
information documents to familiarize
agencies, Tribes, the public, and
interested organizations with the
proposed projects and potential
environmental issues. Copies of the
documents will be available at the
public meeting and at the Web site
www.eisgatewaypacificwa.gov or can be
requested by contacting the Corps,
Seattle District, as described above.
Corps’ representatives will answer
scope-related questions and accept
comments at public scoping meetings.
a. Public scoping meetings will be
held to present an overview of the GPT
and Custer Spur projects and to afford
all parties an opportunity to provide
comments regarding the range of
actions, alternatives, and potential
impacts. The public scoping meetings
will be held as follows:
At Squalicum High School, 3773 East
McLeod Road, Bellingham,
Washington 98226–7728 on Saturday,
October 27, 2012, from 11 a.m. to 3
p.m.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
At Friday Harbor High School, 45 Blair
Avenue, Friday Harbor, Washington
98250 on Saturday, November 3,
2012, from 12 a.m. to 3 p.m.
At McIntyre Hall, 2501 East College
Way, Mount Vernon, Washington
98273 on Monday, November 5, 2012,
from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.
At North Seattle Community College,
9600 College Way North, Seattle,
Washington 98103 on Tuesday,
November 13, 2012, from 4 p.m. to 7
p.m.
At Ferndale Events Center, 5715 Barrett
Road, Ferndale, Washington 98248 on
Thursday, November 29, 2012, from 3
p.m. to 7 p.m.
At Spokane County Fairgrounds, 404
North Havana Street, Spokane Valley,
Washington 99202 on Tuesday,
December 4, 2012, from 4 p.m. to 7
p.m.
At Clark College, Graiser Student
Center, 1933 Fort Vancouver Way,
Vancouver, Washington 98663 on
Wednesday, December 12, 2012, from
4 p.m. to 7 p.m.
During the scoping period, a
continuous ‘‘on-line scoping meeting’’
will be hosted on the EIS Web site at
www.eisgatewaypacificwa.gov.
b. Potentially significant issues to be
analyzed in the EIS include but are not
limited to project-specific and
cumulative effects on navigation (e.g.,
vessel traffic and navigational safety);
marine aquatic habitats, including Statedesignated aquatic reserves; marine
aquatic species, including Endangered
Species Act listed species and
Washington State species of concern;
Tribal treaty rights; wetland and
riparian habitat and wildlife; railroad
and vehicle traffic; cultural, historic,
and archeological resources; air and
water quality; noise; recreation; land
use; and aesthetics.
c. The Corps will serve as the lead
agency for compliance with NEPA, and
Whatcom County Planning and
Development Services (the County) and
the Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology) will serve as the lead
agencies for compliance with SEPA. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and U.S. Coast Guard will serve as
cooperating agencies under NEPA. The
Corps will consult with the Washington
State Historic Preservation Officer and
applicable Tribes to comply with the
National Historic Preservation Act; the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
National Marine Fisheries Service to
comply with the Endangered Species
Act; the National Marine Fisheries
Service to comply with the Essential
Fish Habitat provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Conservation and Management Act; and
applicable Tribes to comply with treaty
provisions on fishing rights.
d. Development of the draft EIS will
begin after the close of the scoping
period. The draft EIS is currently
scheduled to be available for public
review and comment in January 2014.
e. A 120-day public review period
will be provided for all interested
parties, individuals, and agencies to
review and comment on the draft EIS.
All interested parties are encouraged to
respond to this notice and provide a
current address if they wish to be
notified when the draft EIS is issued.
f. All comments received will become
part of the administrative record and are
subject to public release, as appropriate,
in their entirety, including any
personally identifiable information such
as names, phone numbers, and
addresses if included in the comment.
Dated: September 4, 2012.
Bruce A. Estok,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 2012–23301 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
RIN 0710–AA71
Reissuance of Nationwide Permits
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
Final notice; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers published a document in the
Federal Register of February 21, 2012,
a final notice concerning the reissuance
of nationwide permits. On March 19,
2012, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
published a correction to that final
notice. This document contains
additional corrections to the February
21, 2012, final notice.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Attn: CECW–CO–R, 441 G
Street NW., Washington, DC 20314–
1000.
SUMMARY:
Mr.
David Olson at 202–761–4922 or by
email at david.b.olson@usace.army.mil
or access the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Regulatory Home Page at
https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/
CivilWorks/
RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Corrections
In the Federal Register of February
21, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012–3687, the
following corrections are made:
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
On page 10273, second column,
correct the first sentence of NWP 15 to
read as follows to reflect the fact that the
U.S. Coast Guard authorizes bridges
over navigable waters through permits
issued under other statutory authorities,
such as the General Bridge Act of 1946
(33 U.S.C. 525, 528, 530, and 533),
instead of Section 9 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401):
‘‘Discharges of dredged or fill material
incidental to the construction of a
bridge across navigable waters of the
United States, including cofferdams,
abutments, foundation seals, piers, and
temporary construction and access fills,
provided the construction of the bridge
structure has been authorized by the
U.S. Coast Guard under Section 9 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 or other
applicable laws.’’
On page 10287, second column,
correct the first sentence of paragraph
(d)(2) of general condition 31 to read as
follows: ‘‘For all NWP activities that
require pre-construction notification
and result in the loss of greater than 1⁄2acre of waters of the United States, for
NWP 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51,
and 52 activities that require preconstruction notification and will result
in the loss of greater than 300 linear feet
of stream bed, and for all NWP 48
activities that require pre-construction
notification, the district engineer will
immediately provide (e.g., via email,
facsimile transmission, overnight mail,
or other expeditious manner) a copy of
the complete PCN to the appropriate
Federal or state offices (U.S. FWS, state
natural resource or water quality
agency, EPA, State Historic Preservation
Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer (THPO), and, if
appropriate, the NMFS).’’
Dated: September 18, 2012.
James R. Hannon,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Directorate
of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2012–23388 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2
Capture and Sequestration Project,
Southeastern TX
AGENCY:
U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE).
Notice of availability and public
hearings.
ACTION:
DOE announces the
availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the W.A. Parish
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Capture and Sequestration Project
(DOE/EIS–0473D) for public review and
comment, as well as the dates, locations,
and times for two public hearings. The
draft environmental impact statement
(EIS) analyzes the potential
environmental impacts of a project
proposed by NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG),
which was selected by DOE to receive
financial assistance under the Clean
Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) program.
DOE’s proposed action is to provide
cost-shared funding to NRG under the
CCPI. DOE proposes to provide NRG
with up to $167 million of the overall
project cost to support the construction
and operation of NRG’s W.A. Parish
Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and
Sequestration Project (Parish PCCS
Project). NRG’s proposed project would
demonstrate the commercial feasibility
of a retrofit, commercial-scale CO2
capture and compression system,
coupled with use of the captured CO2
for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and
ultimate sequestration. NRG would
design and construct a system that
would capture at least 90 percent of the
CO2 in an up to 250-megawatt
equivalent (MWe) flue gas slipstream of
the combustion exhaust gases from the
existing 650-megawatt (MW) coal fired
Unit 8 at NRG’s W.A. Parish Plant in
Fort Bend County, Texas. The captured
CO2 (up to 5,475 tons per day) would be
transported approximately 80 miles in a
new pipeline to be constructed by NRG.
The CO2 would be used for EOR and
ultimately sequestered at the existing
West Ranch oil field in Jackson County,
Texas.
DATES: DOE invites the public to
comment on the draft EIS during the
public comment period, which ends
November 5, 2012. DOE will consider
all comments postmarked or received
during the comment period in preparing
the final EIS and will consider late
comments to the extent practicable. In
addition to receiving comments in
writing and by email [See ADDRESSES],
DOE will conduct two public hearings
at which government agencies, private
sector organizations, Native American
tribes, and individuals are invited to
present oral and written comments on
the draft EIS. The public hearings will
be held at the Thompsons Community
Center, 134 Oilfield Road, Thompsons,
Texas, on October 10, 2012, and at the
Edna High School, 1303 W. Gayle
Street, Edna, Texas, on October 11,
2012. Oral comments will be heard
during the formal portion of the public
hearings beginning at 7 p.m. The public
is also invited to informal sessions
beginning at 5 p.m. at the same
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58533
locations to learn more about the project
and DOE’s proposed action.
Representatives from DOE and NRG will
be present at the informal sessions to
discuss the proposed project, the CCPI
program, and the EIS process. Displays
and other information about DOE’s
proposed action and NRG’s Parish PCCS
Project will also be available.
ADDRESSES: Requests for paper or
electronic copies of the draft EIS,
requests to speak at the public hearings,
or submission of written comments
should be directed to: Mr. Mark W.
Lusk, National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Document Manager,
National Energy Technology Laboratory
(NETL), 3610 Collins Ferry Road, M/S
I07, P.O. Box 880, Morgantown, WV
26507–0880. Requests or comments can
also be made by electronic mail to
Parish.EIS0473@netl.doe.gov; by
telephone (412) 386–7435, toll free 1–
877–812–1569; or by fax (304) 285–
4403.
The draft EIS is available on the NETL
Web page at https://www.netl.doe.gov/
publications/others/nepa/
and on the DOE NEPA Web page at
https://energy.gov/nepa/nepadocuments.htm. Copies of the draft EIS
will also be available at the locations
listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
Written comments on the draft EIS
should be marked ‘‘Parish PCCS
Project’’ and sent to Mark W. Lusk,
NEPA document manager, by one of the
methods listed above. Oral comments
on the draft EIS can be provided during
the public hearings scheduled for the
dates and locations provided in the
DATES section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about this project or
the draft EIS, please contact Mr. Mark
W. Lusk (see ADDRESSES). For general
information on the DOE NEPA process,
please contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom,
Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance (GC–54), DOE, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; telephone (202)
586–4600; fax (202) 586–7031; or leave
a toll free message at 1–800–472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE’s
proposed action is to provide financial
assistance to NRG under the CCPI
Program to support construction and
operation of NRG’s Parish PCCS Project.
DOE would provide NRG with up to
$167 million of the overall project cost,
or about 20 percent of the estimated
total costs. This funding would be used
for project design and development,
procurement of capital equipment,
construction, CO2 capture plant
operations, and CO2 monitoring during
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58532-58533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23388]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
RIN 0710-AA71
Reissuance of Nationwide Permits
AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Final notice; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a document in the
Federal Register of February 21, 2012, a final notice concerning the
reissuance of nationwide permits. On March 19, 2012, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers published a correction to that final notice. This
document contains additional corrections to the February 21, 2012,
final notice.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO-R, 441 G Street
NW., Washington, DC 20314-1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Olson at 202-761-4922 or by
email at david.b.olson@usace.army.mil or access the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Regulatory Home Page at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx.
Corrections
In the Federal Register of February 21, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-3687,
the following corrections are made:
[[Page 58533]]
On page 10273, second column, correct the first sentence of NWP 15
to read as follows to reflect the fact that the U.S. Coast Guard
authorizes bridges over navigable waters through permits issued under
other statutory authorities, such as the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33
U.S.C. 525, 528, 530, and 533), instead of Section 9 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401): ``Discharges of dredged or fill
material incidental to the construction of a bridge across navigable
waters of the United States, including cofferdams, abutments,
foundation seals, piers, and temporary construction and access fills,
provided the construction of the bridge structure has been authorized
by the U.S. Coast Guard under Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1899 or other applicable laws.''
On page 10287, second column, correct the first sentence of
paragraph (d)(2) of general condition 31 to read as follows: ``For all
NWP activities that require pre-construction notification and result in
the loss of greater than \1/2\-acre of waters of the United States, for
NWP 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52 activities that require
pre-construction notification and will result in the loss of greater
than 300 linear feet of stream bed, and for all NWP 48 activities that
require pre-construction notification, the district engineer will
immediately provide (e.g., via email, facsimile transmission, overnight
mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy of the complete PCN to the
appropriate Federal or state offices (U.S. FWS, state natural resource
or water quality agency, EPA, State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), and, if
appropriate, the NMFS).''
Dated: September 18, 2012.
James R. Hannon,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2012-23388 Filed 9-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-52-P