Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2, 58533-58534 [2012-23320]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
On page 10273, second column,
correct the first sentence of NWP 15 to
read as follows to reflect the fact that the
U.S. Coast Guard authorizes bridges
over navigable waters through permits
issued under other statutory authorities,
such as the General Bridge Act of 1946
(33 U.S.C. 525, 528, 530, and 533),
instead of Section 9 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401):
‘‘Discharges of dredged or fill material
incidental to the construction of a
bridge across navigable waters of the
United States, including cofferdams,
abutments, foundation seals, piers, and
temporary construction and access fills,
provided the construction of the bridge
structure has been authorized by the
U.S. Coast Guard under Section 9 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 or other
applicable laws.’’
On page 10287, second column,
correct the first sentence of paragraph
(d)(2) of general condition 31 to read as
follows: ‘‘For all NWP activities that
require pre-construction notification
and result in the loss of greater than 1⁄2acre of waters of the United States, for
NWP 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51,
and 52 activities that require preconstruction notification and will result
in the loss of greater than 300 linear feet
of stream bed, and for all NWP 48
activities that require pre-construction
notification, the district engineer will
immediately provide (e.g., via email,
facsimile transmission, overnight mail,
or other expeditious manner) a copy of
the complete PCN to the appropriate
Federal or state offices (U.S. FWS, state
natural resource or water quality
agency, EPA, State Historic Preservation
Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer (THPO), and, if
appropriate, the NMFS).’’
Dated: September 18, 2012.
James R. Hannon,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Directorate
of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2012–23388 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2
Capture and Sequestration Project,
Southeastern TX
AGENCY:
U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE).
Notice of availability and public
hearings.
ACTION:
DOE announces the
availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the W.A. Parish
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Capture and Sequestration Project
(DOE/EIS–0473D) for public review and
comment, as well as the dates, locations,
and times for two public hearings. The
draft environmental impact statement
(EIS) analyzes the potential
environmental impacts of a project
proposed by NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG),
which was selected by DOE to receive
financial assistance under the Clean
Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) program.
DOE’s proposed action is to provide
cost-shared funding to NRG under the
CCPI. DOE proposes to provide NRG
with up to $167 million of the overall
project cost to support the construction
and operation of NRG’s W.A. Parish
Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and
Sequestration Project (Parish PCCS
Project). NRG’s proposed project would
demonstrate the commercial feasibility
of a retrofit, commercial-scale CO2
capture and compression system,
coupled with use of the captured CO2
for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and
ultimate sequestration. NRG would
design and construct a system that
would capture at least 90 percent of the
CO2 in an up to 250-megawatt
equivalent (MWe) flue gas slipstream of
the combustion exhaust gases from the
existing 650-megawatt (MW) coal fired
Unit 8 at NRG’s W.A. Parish Plant in
Fort Bend County, Texas. The captured
CO2 (up to 5,475 tons per day) would be
transported approximately 80 miles in a
new pipeline to be constructed by NRG.
The CO2 would be used for EOR and
ultimately sequestered at the existing
West Ranch oil field in Jackson County,
Texas.
DATES: DOE invites the public to
comment on the draft EIS during the
public comment period, which ends
November 5, 2012. DOE will consider
all comments postmarked or received
during the comment period in preparing
the final EIS and will consider late
comments to the extent practicable. In
addition to receiving comments in
writing and by email [See ADDRESSES],
DOE will conduct two public hearings
at which government agencies, private
sector organizations, Native American
tribes, and individuals are invited to
present oral and written comments on
the draft EIS. The public hearings will
be held at the Thompsons Community
Center, 134 Oilfield Road, Thompsons,
Texas, on October 10, 2012, and at the
Edna High School, 1303 W. Gayle
Street, Edna, Texas, on October 11,
2012. Oral comments will be heard
during the formal portion of the public
hearings beginning at 7 p.m. The public
is also invited to informal sessions
beginning at 5 p.m. at the same
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58533
locations to learn more about the project
and DOE’s proposed action.
Representatives from DOE and NRG will
be present at the informal sessions to
discuss the proposed project, the CCPI
program, and the EIS process. Displays
and other information about DOE’s
proposed action and NRG’s Parish PCCS
Project will also be available.
ADDRESSES: Requests for paper or
electronic copies of the draft EIS,
requests to speak at the public hearings,
or submission of written comments
should be directed to: Mr. Mark W.
Lusk, National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Document Manager,
National Energy Technology Laboratory
(NETL), 3610 Collins Ferry Road, M/S
I07, P.O. Box 880, Morgantown, WV
26507–0880. Requests or comments can
also be made by electronic mail to
Parish.EIS0473@netl.doe.gov; by
telephone (412) 386–7435, toll free 1–
877–812–1569; or by fax (304) 285–
4403.
The draft EIS is available on the NETL
Web page at https://www.netl.doe.gov/
publications/others/nepa/
and on the DOE NEPA Web page at
https://energy.gov/nepa/nepadocuments.htm. Copies of the draft EIS
will also be available at the locations
listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
Written comments on the draft EIS
should be marked ‘‘Parish PCCS
Project’’ and sent to Mark W. Lusk,
NEPA document manager, by one of the
methods listed above. Oral comments
on the draft EIS can be provided during
the public hearings scheduled for the
dates and locations provided in the
DATES section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about this project or
the draft EIS, please contact Mr. Mark
W. Lusk (see ADDRESSES). For general
information on the DOE NEPA process,
please contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom,
Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance (GC–54), DOE, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; telephone (202)
586–4600; fax (202) 586–7031; or leave
a toll free message at 1–800–472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE’s
proposed action is to provide financial
assistance to NRG under the CCPI
Program to support construction and
operation of NRG’s Parish PCCS Project.
DOE would provide NRG with up to
$167 million of the overall project cost,
or about 20 percent of the estimated
total costs. This funding would be used
for project design and development,
procurement of capital equipment,
construction, CO2 capture plant
operations, and CO2 monitoring during
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58534
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
the 35-month demonstration period of
the CO2 capture and compression
system.
The proposed Parish PCCS Project
would use an advanced amine-based
CO2 absorption technology to capture at
least 90 percent of the CO2 from an up
to 250–MWe portion of the flue gas
exhaust from Unit 8 of NRG’s existing
W.A. Parish Plant in Thompsons, Texas.
The project would be designed to
capture approximately 1.6 million tons
of CO2 per year from the Unit 8 exhaust
that the facility would otherwise emit.
The proposed CO2 capture facility
would be constructed within NRG’s
existing 4,880-acre W.A. Parish Plant in
rural Fort Bend County near the small
town of Thompsons, Texas. A new
natural gas fired cogeneration plant,
estimated to be 80 MW in size, would
also be constructed on the plant
property to produce the auxiliary power
and steam needed for operation of the
proposed CO2 capture system.
The captured CO2 would be
compressed and transported via a new,
approximately 80-mile long, 12-inch
diameter underground pipeline to the
existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson
County, Texas, where it would be used
for EOR and ultimately sequestered in
geologic formations from 5,000 to 6,300
feet below ground surface. The
proposed CO2 pipeline route crosses
sparsely populated rural and
agricultural lands in Fort Bend,
Wharton, and Jackson Counties and
would be located along or within
existing mowed and maintained utility
rights-of-way for approximately 85
percent of its length. The West Ranch
oil field is located near the town of
Vanderbilt, Texas. Existing wells at the
West Ranch oil field would be used (i.e.,
refurbished or deepened, as needed) to
the extent practicable for the proposed
project. Some new injection wells
would be drilled in accordance with
underground injection control
regulations, and would be installed on
existing well pads to the extent
practicable.
Consistent with DOE’s requirements
under CCPI Round 3, NRG identified the
following objectives for the Parish PCCS
Project:
• Demonstration of advanced aminebased CO2 absorption technology;
• Integration of a cogeneration plant
into the project to meet the specific
power and steam requirements of the
CO2 capture system;
• Demonstration of EOR with CO2
sequestration in a nearby oil field; and
• Demonstration of a CO2 monitoring
program.
DOE prepared this EIS pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
(NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code
[U.S.C.] 4321 et seq.) and in compliance
with the Council on Environmental
Quality implementing regulations for
NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) parts 1500 through 1508) and
DOE’s NEPA implementing procedures
(10 CFR part 1021). Projects considered
by DOE for possible CCPI funding
originate as a private party’s (e.g.,
electric power industry) application
submitted to DOE in response to
requirements specified in CCPI funding
opportunity announcements. DOE’s
decision is to either accept or reject the
project as proposed, including the
proposed technology and the selected
sites. However, DOE may require
mitigation measures to reduce a
project’s potential impacts.
Consequently, DOE’s consideration of
reasonable alternatives is limited to the
technically acceptable application and
the no action-alternative for each
selected project.
Under the no-action alternative, DOE
would not provide cost-shared funding
for the proposed Parish PCCS Project. In
the absence of DOE cost-shared funding,
NRG could still elect to construct and
operate the proposed project. Therefore,
the DOE no-action alternative could
result in one of two scenarios:
• The proposed Parish PCCS Project
would not be built, or
• The proposed Parish PCCS Project
would be built by NRG without benefit
of DOE cost-shared funding.
DOE assumes that if NRG proceeded
with project development in the absence
of DOE cost-shared funding, the project
would include the features, attributes,
and impacts as described for the
proposed project. However, without
DOE participation, it is possible that the
project would be canceled. Therefore,
for the purposes of analysis in the draft
EIS, the DOE no-action alternative is
defined as the no-build alternative. This
means that the project would not be
built and environmental conditions
would not change from the current
baseline (i.e., no new construction,
resource use, or CO2 capture and storage
would occur). Therefore, under the noaction alternative, the project
technologies (i.e., large-scale CO2
capture and geologic storage) may not be
implemented in the near term.
Consequently, timely commercialization
of these technologies for large-scale,
coal-fired electric generation facilities
would be postponed and may not be
realized. This scenario would not
contribute to the CCPI goals to invest in
the demonstration of advanced coalbased power generation technologies
that capture the CO2 emissions and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
either sequester them or put them to
beneficial use.
The draft EIS analyzes the
environmental consequences that may
result from the proposed action and the
no action alternative. Potential impacts
identified during the scoping process
and analyzed in the draft EIS relate to
the following: Air quality and climate;
greenhouse gases; geology;
physiography and soils; groundwater;
surface water; wetlands and floodplains;
biological resources; cultural resources;
land use and aesthetics; traffic and
transportation; noise; materials and
waste management; human health and
safety; utilities; community services;
socioeconomics; and environmental
justice. DOE also intends to use the
NEPA process and the analyses
completed for the draft EIS to satisfy the
requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act and
DOE regulations regarding impacts to
floodplains and wetlands.
DOE distributed copies of the draft
EIS to Members of Congress; Native
American tribal governments; federal,
state, and local officials; and agencies,
organizations, and individuals who may
be interested or affected. Copies of the
draft EIS are available for review at the
George Memorial Library, 1001
Golfview Drive, Richmond, TX 77469;
the Albert George Branch Library, 9230
Gene Street, Needville, TX 77461; the
Wharton County Library, 1920 North
Fulton Street, Wharton, TX 77488; and
the Jackson County Memorial Library,
411 North Wells Street, Room 121,
Edna, TX 77957. The draft EIS will also
be available on the Internet at https://
www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/
nepa/ or https://energy.gov/
nepa/nepa-documents.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
14, 2012.
Mark J. Matarrese,
Director, Office of Environment, Security,
Safety & Health, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012–23320 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Electricity Advisory Committee
Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice announces a
meeting of the Electricity Advisory
Committee (EAC). The Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat.
770) requires that public notice of these
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58533-58534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23320]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture
and Sequestration Project, Southeastern TX
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of availability and public hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DOE announces the availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the W.A. Parish Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide
(CO2) Capture and Sequestration Project (DOE/EIS-0473D) for public
review and comment, as well as the dates, locations, and times for two
public hearings. The draft environmental impact statement (EIS)
analyzes the potential environmental impacts of a project proposed by
NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG), which was selected by DOE to receive financial
assistance under the Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) program. DOE's
proposed action is to provide cost-shared funding to NRG under the
CCPI. DOE proposes to provide NRG with up to $167 million of the
overall project cost to support the construction and operation of NRG's
W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 Capture and Sequestration
Project (Parish PCCS Project). NRG's proposed project would demonstrate
the commercial feasibility of a retrofit, commercial-scale
CO2 capture and compression system, coupled with use of the
captured CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and ultimate
sequestration. NRG would design and construct a system that would
capture at least 90 percent of the CO2 in an up to 250-
megawatt equivalent (MWe) flue gas slipstream of the combustion exhaust
gases from the existing 650-megawatt (MW) coal fired Unit 8 at NRG's
W.A. Parish Plant in Fort Bend County, Texas. The captured
CO2 (up to 5,475 tons per day) would be transported
approximately 80 miles in a new pipeline to be constructed by NRG. The
CO2 would be used for EOR and ultimately sequestered at the
existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson County, Texas.
DATES: DOE invites the public to comment on the draft EIS during the
public comment period, which ends November 5, 2012. DOE will consider
all comments postmarked or received during the comment period in
preparing the final EIS and will consider late comments to the extent
practicable. In addition to receiving comments in writing and by email
[See ADDRESSES], DOE will conduct two public hearings at which
government agencies, private sector organizations, Native American
tribes, and individuals are invited to present oral and written
comments on the draft EIS. The public hearings will be held at the
Thompsons Community Center, 134 Oilfield Road, Thompsons, Texas, on
October 10, 2012, and at the Edna High School, 1303 W. Gayle Street,
Edna, Texas, on October 11, 2012. Oral comments will be heard during
the formal portion of the public hearings beginning at 7 p.m. The
public is also invited to informal sessions beginning at 5 p.m. at the
same locations to learn more about the project and DOE's proposed
action. Representatives from DOE and NRG will be present at the
informal sessions to discuss the proposed project, the CCPI program,
and the EIS process. Displays and other information about DOE's
proposed action and NRG's Parish PCCS Project will also be available.
ADDRESSES: Requests for paper or electronic copies of the draft EIS,
requests to speak at the public hearings, or submission of written
comments should be directed to: Mr. Mark W. Lusk, National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Document Manager, National Energy
Technology Laboratory (NETL), 3610 Collins Ferry Road, M/S I07, P.O.
Box 880, Morgantown, WV 26507-0880. Requests or comments can also be
made by electronic mail to Parish.EIS0473@netl.doe.gov; by telephone
(412) 386-7435, toll free 1-877-812-1569; or by fax (304) 285-4403.
The draft EIS is available on the NETL Web page at https://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/nepa/ and on the DOE
NEPA Web page at https://energy.gov/nepa/nepa-documents.htm. Copies of
the draft EIS will also be available at the locations listed in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice. Written comments on
the draft EIS should be marked ``Parish PCCS Project'' and sent to Mark
W. Lusk, NEPA document manager, by one of the methods listed above.
Oral comments on the draft EIS can be provided during the public
hearings scheduled for the dates and locations provided in the DATES
section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this
project or the draft EIS, please contact Mr. Mark W. Lusk (see
ADDRESSES). For general information on the DOE NEPA process, please
contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance (GC-54), DOE, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585; telephone (202) 586-4600; fax (202) 586-7031; or leave a toll
free message at 1-800-472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE's proposed action is to provide
financial assistance to NRG under the CCPI Program to support
construction and operation of NRG's Parish PCCS Project. DOE would
provide NRG with up to $167 million of the overall project cost, or
about 20 percent of the estimated total costs. This funding would be
used for project design and development, procurement of capital
equipment, construction, CO2 capture plant operations, and
CO2 monitoring during
[[Page 58534]]
the 35-month demonstration period of the CO2 capture and
compression system.
The proposed Parish PCCS Project would use an advanced amine-based
CO2 absorption technology to capture at least 90 percent of
the CO2 from an up to 250-MWe portion of the flue gas
exhaust from Unit 8 of NRG's existing W.A. Parish Plant in Thompsons,
Texas. The project would be designed to capture approximately 1.6
million tons of CO2 per year from the Unit 8 exhaust that
the facility would otherwise emit. The proposed CO2 capture
facility would be constructed within NRG's existing 4,880-acre W.A.
Parish Plant in rural Fort Bend County near the small town of
Thompsons, Texas. A new natural gas fired cogeneration plant, estimated
to be 80 MW in size, would also be constructed on the plant property to
produce the auxiliary power and steam needed for operation of the
proposed CO2 capture system.
The captured CO2 would be compressed and transported via
a new, approximately 80-mile long, 12-inch diameter underground
pipeline to the existing West Ranch oil field in Jackson County, Texas,
where it would be used for EOR and ultimately sequestered in geologic
formations from 5,000 to 6,300 feet below ground surface. The proposed
CO2 pipeline route crosses sparsely populated rural and
agricultural lands in Fort Bend, Wharton, and Jackson Counties and
would be located along or within existing mowed and maintained utility
rights-of-way for approximately 85 percent of its length. The West
Ranch oil field is located near the town of Vanderbilt, Texas. Existing
wells at the West Ranch oil field would be used (i.e., refurbished or
deepened, as needed) to the extent practicable for the proposed
project. Some new injection wells would be drilled in accordance with
underground injection control regulations, and would be installed on
existing well pads to the extent practicable.
Consistent with DOE's requirements under CCPI Round 3, NRG
identified the following objectives for the Parish PCCS Project:
Demonstration of advanced amine-based CO2
absorption technology;
Integration of a cogeneration plant into the project to
meet the specific power and steam requirements of the CO2
capture system;
Demonstration of EOR with CO2 sequestration in
a nearby oil field; and
Demonstration of a CO2 monitoring program.
DOE prepared this EIS pursuant to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 4321 et seq.) and in
compliance with the Council on Environmental Quality implementing
regulations for NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 1500
through 1508) and DOE's NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR part
1021). Projects considered by DOE for possible CCPI funding originate
as a private party's (e.g., electric power industry) application
submitted to DOE in response to requirements specified in CCPI funding
opportunity announcements. DOE's decision is to either accept or reject
the project as proposed, including the proposed technology and the
selected sites. However, DOE may require mitigation measures to reduce
a project's potential impacts. Consequently, DOE's consideration of
reasonable alternatives is limited to the technically acceptable
application and the no action-alternative for each selected project.
Under the no-action alternative, DOE would not provide cost-shared
funding for the proposed Parish PCCS Project. In the absence of DOE
cost-shared funding, NRG could still elect to construct and operate the
proposed project. Therefore, the DOE no-action alternative could result
in one of two scenarios:
The proposed Parish PCCS Project would not be built, or
The proposed Parish PCCS Project would be built by NRG
without benefit of DOE cost-shared funding.
DOE assumes that if NRG proceeded with project development in the
absence of DOE cost-shared funding, the project would include the
features, attributes, and impacts as described for the proposed
project. However, without DOE participation, it is possible that the
project would be canceled. Therefore, for the purposes of analysis in
the draft EIS, the DOE no-action alternative is defined as the no-build
alternative. This means that the project would not be built and
environmental conditions would not change from the current baseline
(i.e., no new construction, resource use, or CO2 capture and
storage would occur). Therefore, under the no-action alternative, the
project technologies (i.e., large-scale CO2 capture and
geologic storage) may not be implemented in the near term.
Consequently, timely commercialization of these technologies for large-
scale, coal-fired electric generation facilities would be postponed and
may not be realized. This scenario would not contribute to the CCPI
goals to invest in the demonstration of advanced coal-based power
generation technologies that capture the CO2 emissions and
either sequester them or put them to beneficial use.
The draft EIS analyzes the environmental consequences that may
result from the proposed action and the no action alternative.
Potential impacts identified during the scoping process and analyzed in
the draft EIS relate to the following: Air quality and climate;
greenhouse gases; geology; physiography and soils; groundwater; surface
water; wetlands and floodplains; biological resources; cultural
resources; land use and aesthetics; traffic and transportation; noise;
materials and waste management; human health and safety; utilities;
community services; socioeconomics; and environmental justice. DOE also
intends to use the NEPA process and the analyses completed for the
draft EIS to satisfy the requirements of Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and DOE regulations regarding impacts to
floodplains and wetlands.
DOE distributed copies of the draft EIS to Members of Congress;
Native American tribal governments; federal, state, and local
officials; and agencies, organizations, and individuals who may be
interested or affected. Copies of the draft EIS are available for
review at the George Memorial Library, 1001 Golfview Drive, Richmond,
TX 77469; the Albert George Branch Library, 9230 Gene Street,
Needville, TX 77461; the Wharton County Library, 1920 North Fulton
Street, Wharton, TX 77488; and the Jackson County Memorial Library, 411
North Wells Street, Room 121, Edna, TX 77957. The draft EIS will also
be available on the Internet at https://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/nepa/ or https://energy.gov/nepa/nepa-documents.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 14, 2012.
Mark J. Matarrese,
Director, Office of Environment, Security, Safety & Health, Office of
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012-23320 Filed 9-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P