Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC); Working Group Activity Update, 58608-58615 [2012-23305]
Download as PDF
58608
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
Altitude Chamber complies with the
criteria:
—Acceptance Test Plan,
—Pressure profile demonstrations, and
—Altimeter and pressure gauge test
results.
For
questions about the performance
criteria, you may contact Randal Maday,
Licensing and Evaluation Division
(AST–200), FAA Office of Commercial
Space Transportation (AST), 800
Independence Avenue SW., Room 331,
Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202)
267–8652; Email
randal.maday@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
17, 2012.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial
Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2012–23360 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Submission Deadline for
Schedule Information for O’Hare
International Airport, San Francisco
International Airport, John F. Kennedy
International Airport, and Newark
Liberty International Airport for the
Summer 2013 Scheduling Season
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of submission deadline.
AGENCY:
Under this notice, the FAA
announces the submission deadline of
October 11, 2012, for Summer 2013
flight schedules at Chicago’s O’Hare
International Airport (ORD), San
Francisco International Airport (SFO),
New York’s John F. Kennedy
International Airport (JFK), and Newark
Liberty International Airport (EWR) in
accordance with the International Air
Transport Association (IATA)
Worldwide Slot Guidelines. The
deadline coincides with the schedule
submission deadline for the IATA Slots
Conference for the Summer 2013
scheduling season.
DATES: Schedules must be submitted no
later than October 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Schedules may be
submitted by mail to the Slot
Administration Office, AGC–200, Office
of the Chief Counsel, 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591;
facsimile: 202–267–7277; or by email to:
7-AWA-slotadmin@faa.gov.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hawks, Office of the Chief
Counsel, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone number: 202–267–7143; fax
number: 202–267–7971; email:
rob.hawks@faa.gov.
The FAA
has designated ORD as an IATA Level
2 airport, SFO as a Level 2 airport, JFK
as a Level 3 airport, and EWR as a Level
3 airport. Scheduled operations at JFK
and EWR are currently limited by FAA
Orders until a final Congestion
Management Rule for LaGuardia
Airport, John F. Kennedy International
Airport, and Newark Liberty
International Airport (RIN 2120–AJ89)
becomes effective but not later than
October 26, 2013.1
The FAA is primarily concerned
about planned passenger and cargo
operations during peak hours, but
carriers may submit schedule plans for
the entire day. At ORD, the peak hours
are 0700 to 2100 Central Time (1200 to
0200 UTC), at SFO from 0600 to 2300
Pacific Time (1300 to 0600 UTC), and at
EWR and JFK from 0600 to 2300 Eastern
Time (1000 to 0300 UTC). Carriers
should submit schedule information in
sufficient detail including, at minimum,
the operating carrier, flight number,
scheduled time of operation, frequency,
and effective dates. IATA standard
schedule information format and data
elements (Standard Schedules
Information Manual or SSIM) may be
used.
The U.S. summer scheduling season
for these airports is from March 24,
2013, through October 26, 2013, in
recognition of the IATA northern
summer period. The FAA understands
there may be differences in slot times
due to different U.S. daylight saving
time dates and will accommodate these
differences to the extent possible.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
17, 2012.
Rebecca B. MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law,
Legislation, and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2012–23278 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
1 Operating Limitations at John F. Kennedy
International Airport, 73 FR 3510 (Jan. 18, 2008) as
amended 76 FR 18620 (Apr. 4, 2011); Operating
Limitations at Newark Liberty International Airport,
73 FR 29550 (May 21, 2008) as amended 76 FR
18618 (Apr. 4, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2000–7257; Notice No. 71]
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee
(RSAC); Working Group Activity
Update
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Announcement of Railroad
Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Working Group Activities.
AGENCY:
FRA is updating its
announcement of the RSAC Working
Group activities to reflect its current
status.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Woolverton, RSAC Designated
Federal Officer/Administrative Officer,
FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 493–6212; or Robert Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations,
FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 493–6474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice serves to update FRA’s last
announcement of working group
activities and status reports of April 23,
2012 (77 FR 24257). The 46th full RSAC
meeting was held on April 26, 2012, and
the 47th meeting is scheduled for
September 27, 2012, at the National
Association of Home Builders, National
Housing Center, located at 1201 15th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Since its first meeting in April 1996,
the RSAC has accepted 38 tasks. Status
for each of the open tasks (neither
completed nor terminated) is provided
below:
Open Tasks
Task 96–4—Tourist and Historic
Railroads. Reviewing the
appropriateness of the agency’s current
policy regarding the applicability of
existing and proposed regulations to
tourist, excursion, scenic, and historic
railroads. This task was accepted on
April 2, 1996, and a working group was
established. The working group
monitored the steam locomotive
regulation task. Planned future activities
involve the review of other regulations
for possible adaptation to the safety
needs of tourist and historic railroads.
Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493–
6474.
Task 03–01—Passenger Safety. This
task includes updating and enhancing
the regulations pertaining to passenger
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
safety, based on research and
experience. This task was accepted on
May 20, 2003, and a working group was
established. Prior to embarking on
substantive discussions of a specific
task, the working group set forth in
writing a specific description of the
task. The working group reports
planned activities to the full RSAC at
each scheduled full RSAC meeting,
including milestones for completion of
projects and progress toward
completion. At the first meeting, held
on September 9–10, 2003, a
consolidated list of issues was
completed. At the second meeting, held
on November 6–7, 2003, four task
groups were established: Emergency
Preparedness, Mechanical,
Crashworthiness, and Vehicle/Track
Interaction. The task forces met and
reported on activities for working group
consideration at the third meeting, held
on May 11–12, 2004, and a fourth
meeting was held on October 26–27,
2004. The working group met on March
21–22, 2006, and again on September
12–13, 2006, at which time the group
agreed to establish a task force on
General Passenger Safety. The full
Passenger Safety Working Group met on
April 17–18, 2007; December 11–12,
2007; November 13, 2008; and June 8,
2009. On August 5, 2009, the working
group was requested to establish an
Engineering Task Force (ETF) to
consider technical criteria and
procedures for qualifying alternative
passenger equipment designs as
equivalent in safety to equipment
meeting the design standards in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards.
Consensus Tier III recommendations of
the ETF were developed and were
approved at a meeting on October 6–7,
2011, by the Passenger Safety Working
Group, and these recommendations
were approved by the full RSAC
Committee by electronic vote on March
2, 2012. These recommendations
address safety issues related to highspeed rail trainsets used in the United
States. No additional meetings are
currently scheduled.
Contact: Charles Bielitz, (202) 493–
6314.
Engineering Task Force. The
Passenger Safety Working Group
approved a request from FRA to
establish an ETF under the Passenger
Safety Working Group in August 2009.
The mission of the task force is to
produce a set of technical evaluation
criteria and procedures for passenger
rail equipment built to alternative
designs. The technical evaluation
criteria and procedures would provide a
means of establishing whether an
alternative design would result in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
performance at least equal to the
structural design standards set forth in
the Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards (Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 238). The initial
focus of this effort will be on Tier I
standards. When completed, the criteria
and procedures would form a technical
basis for making determinations
concerning equivalent safety pursuant
to 49 CFR Section 238.201, and provide
a technical framework for presenting
evidence to FRA in support of any
request for waiver of the compressive
(buff) strength requirement, as set forth
in 49 CFR 238.203. See 49 CFR part 211,
Rules of Practice. The criteria and
procedures could be incorporated into
Part 238 at a later date after notice and
opportunity for public comment. The
ETF was formed and a kickoff meeting
was held on September 23–24, 2009.
The group held follow-on meetings
November 3–4, 2009; January 7–8, 2010;
and March 9–10, 2010. A followup
GoTo/Webinar meeting was held on July
12, 2010. The ETF developed a draft
‘‘Criteria and Procedures Report’’ that
was approved by the Passenger Safety
Working Group during the September
16, 2010, meeting and by the RSAC
Committee during the September 23,
2010, meeting. The document has been
placed on the FRA Web site at the
following address: https://
www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/
RSAC_REPORT-%209-16-10.pdf.
Engineering Task Force II. In order to
build on the success of the ETF in
developing a set of alternative technical
criteria and procedures for evaluating
the crashworthiness and occupant
protection performance of passenger rail
equipment in service at conventional
operating speeds, FRA requested that
the Passenger Safety Working Group retask the group to concentrate on
developing crashworthiness and
occupant protection safety
recommendations for high-speed
passenger trains. The Passenger Safety
Working Group accepted the task on
July 28, 2010, by electronic vote. Under
the new task, the task force may address
any safety features of the equipment,
including but not limited to
crashworthiness, interior occupant
protection, glazing, emergency egress,
and fire safety features. Any type of
equipment may be addressed, including
conventional locomotives, high-speed
power cars, cab cars, multiple-unit (MU)
locomotives, and coach cars. The
equipment addressed may be used in
any type of passenger service, from
conventional-speed to high-speed.
Recommendations may take the form of
criteria and procedures, revisions to
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58609
existing regulations, or adoption of new
regulations, including rules of particular
applicability. The work of the re-tasked
ETF is intended to assist FRA in
developing appropriate safety standards
for the high-speed rail projects planned
in California and Nevada. The ETF II
held a kickoff meeting on October 21–
22, 2010, to begin work on the new
high-speed task, and had follow-on
meetings on January 11–12, February
14–15, March 30–31, June 16–17,
October 6–7, 2011; and June 27–28,
2012. Consensus Tier III
recommendations of the ETF were
developed and were accepted by vote
during the meeting on October 6–7,
2011. The ETF II formed three
additional Task Groups to work in the
areas of track worthiness and brakes.
The Track Worthiness Task Group is
tasked to identify potential safety issues
related to operation of high-speed
trainsets on conventional track and to
make recommendations on how best to
mitigate any consequences. The Task
Group includes experts and key
stakeholders such as international
operators of high-speed equipment, car
builders, wheel/rail interaction
dynamics specialists, and other RSAC
working group members involved in
vehicle/track interaction.
The Brakes Task Group is tasked to
review braking system requirements and
international braking system
requirements versus existing U.S.
requirements including inspection and
maintenance and identify common
features, determine basic parameters,
and consider use of service proven
braking systems. The Task Group will
also consider performance-based
provisions and requirements with
consideration for operators to develop
maintenance, inspection, and service
plans, and make recommendations
regarding brakes to the ETF II as related
to Tier III.
The Engineering Structure and
Integrity Task Group is tasked to
develop a document that outlines and
describes procedures and processes
necessary to demonstrate compliance
with the requirements of applicable
Federal regulations and American
Public Transportation Association
(APTA) standards for structural integrity
and crashworthiness for railroad
passenger train sets. The next ETF
meeting is scheduled for September
2526, 2012. Contact: Robert Lauby, (202)
493–6474.
Emergency Preparedness Task Force.
At the working group meeting on March
9–10, 2005, the working group received
and approved the consensus report of
the Emergency Preparedness Task Force
related to emergency communication,
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58610
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
emergency egress, and rescue access.
These recommendations were presented
to and approved by the full RSAC on
May 18, 2005. The working group met
on September 7–8, 2005, and additional,
supplementary recommendations were
presented to and accepted by the full
RSAC on October 11, 2005. The Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was
published on August 24, 2006 (71 FR
50275), and was open for comment until
October 23, 2006. The working group
agreed on recommendations for the final
rule, including resolution of final
comments received, during the April
17–18, 2007, meeting. The
recommendations were presented to and
approved by the full RSAC on June 26,
2007. The Passenger Train Emergency
Systems final rule, focusing on
emergency communication, emergency
egress, and rescue access, was published
on February 1, 2008 (73 FR 6370). The
task force met on October 17–18, 2007,
and reached consensus on the draft rule
text for a followup NPRM on Passenger
Train Emergency Systems, focusing on
low location emergency exit path
marking, emergency lighting, and
emergency signage. The task force
presented the draft rule text to the
Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 11–12, 2007, and the
consensus draft rule text was presented
to and approved by full RSAC vote
during the February 20, 2008, meeting.
During the May 13–14, 2008, meeting,
the task force recommended clarifying
the applicability of back-up emergency
communication system requirements in
the February 1, 2008, final rule, and
FRA announced its intention to exercise
limited enforcement discretion for a
new provision amending instruction
requirements for emergency window
exit removal. The working group ratified
these recommendations on June 19,
2008. The task force met again on March
31, 2009, to clarify issues raised by
members related to the followup NPRM.
The modified rule text was presented to
and approved by the Passenger Safety
Working Group on June 8, 2009. The
working group requested that FRA draft
the rule text requiring daily inspection
of removable panels or windows in
vestibule doors and entrust the
Emergency Preparedness Task Force
with reviewing the text. FRA sent the
draft text to the task force for review and
comment on August 4, 2009. The draft
rule text was approved by the Passenger
Safety Working Group by mail ballot on
December 23, 2009, and the resultant
NPRM was published January 3, 2012
(77 FR 154). No additional task force
meetings are currently scheduled.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Contact: Brenda Moscoso, (202) 493–
6282.
Vehicle/Track Interaction Task Force.
The task force is developing proposed
revisions to 49 CFR parts 213 and 238,
principally regarding high-speed
passenger service. The task force met on
October 9–11, 2007, and again on
November 19–20, 2007, in Washington,
DC, and presented the final task force
report and final recommendations and
proposed rule text for approval by the
Passenger Safety Working Group at the
December 11–12, 2007, meeting. The
final report and the proposed rule text
were approved by the working group
and were presented to and approved by
full RSAC vote during the February 20,
2008, meeting. The group met on
February 27–28, 2008, and by
teleconference on March 18, 2010, to
address unresolved issues, and the
NPRM was published on May 10, 2010
(75 FR 25928). The task force was called
back into session on August 5–6, 2010,
to review and consider NPRM
comments. The final rule will amend
the Track Safety Standards and
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards
for high-speed train operations and train
operations at high cant deficiencies to
promote the safe interaction of rail
vehicles with the track over which they
operate. It will revise both the safety
limits for these operations and the
process to qualify them. It accounts for
a range of vehicle types that are
currently used and may likely be used
on future high-speed or high cant
deficiency rail operations, and would
provide safety assurance for train
operations in all classes of track. It is
based on the results of simulation
studies designed to identify track
geometry irregularities associated with
unsafe wheel forces and acceleration,
thorough reviews of vehicle
qualification and revenue service test
data, and consideration of international
practices. The draft final rule was sent
to the task force for final consensus on
November 11, 2011, and was approved
by electronic vote on November 21,
2011. The draft final rule was then
approved by electronic vote by the
Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 12, 2011, and by the full
RSAC Committee by electronic vote on
January 6, 2012. Target publication date
of the final rule is September 2012.
Contact: John Mardente, (202) 493–
1335.
General Passenger Safety Task Force.
At the Passenger Safety Working Group
meeting on April 17–18, 2007, the task
force presented a progress report to the
working group. The task force met on
July 18–19, 2007, and afterwards it
reported proposed reporting cause codes
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for injuries involving the platform gap,
which were approved by the working
group by mail ballot in September 2007.
The full RSAC approved the
recommendations for changes to 49 CFR
part 225 accident/incident cause codes
on October 25, 2007. The General
Passenger Safety Task Force presented
draft guidance material for management
of the gap that was considered and
approved by the working group during
the December 11–12, 2007, meeting and
was presented to and approved by full
RSAC vote during the February 20,
2008, meeting. The group met April 23–
24, 2008, December 3–4, 2008, April 21–
23, 2009, October 7–8, 2009, and July
30, 2010, by GoTo/Webinar
teleconference. The task force continues
work on passenger train door
securement, ‘‘second train in station,’’
trespasser incidents, and system safetybased solutions by developing a
regulatory approach to system safety.
The task force has created two task
groups to focus on these issues.
The Door Safety Task Group has
reached consensus on 47 out of 48
safety issues and had five items that
have been remanded to the task force for
vote. The issues are addressed in the
area of passenger train door mechanical
and operational requirements and
presented draft regulatory language to
the Passenger Safety Working Group at
the September 16, 2010, meeting. More
work remains to ensure the 49 CFR part
238 door rule consensus document and
the proposed APTA door standard
(APTA SS–M–18–10) uses uniform
language. The document was approved
by the Passenger Safety Working Group
by electronic vote on March 31, 2011,
and approved by the RSAC on May 20,
2011. This rulemaking would amend the
passenger equipment safety standards to
enhance safety standards as they relate
to passenger door securement while a
passenger train is in service based on
research and experiences of FRA safety
inspectors. Specifically, FRA would
incorporate by reference APTA
standard: ‘‘APTA SS–M–18–10
Standard for Powered Exterior Side
Door System Design for New Passenger
Cars.’’ A draft NPRM is currently under
development with a target publication
date of September 2012. No additional
Door Task Group meetings are currently
scheduled. Contact: Brian Hontz, (610)
521–8220.
The System Safety Task Group has
produced draft regulatory language for a
System Safety Rule, but work on this
rulemaking was delayed until a study of
legal protections for Risk Reduction
Program (RRP) and System Safety
Program (SSP) risk analysis data that is
required by the Rail Safety Improvement
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
Act of 2008 (RSIA) was completed. The
System Safety rulemaking would
improve passenger railroad safety
through structured, proactive processes
and procedures developed by passenger
railroad operators. It would require
passenger railroads to establish an SSP
that would systematically evaluate and
manage risks in order to reduce the
number and rates of railroad accidents,
incidents, injuries, and fatalities. FRA
continued to work on a draft NPRM
while waiting for the legal review of
protection of hazard analysis
information, required by Section 109 of
the RSIA. The Office of Chief Counsel
completed a legal study and posted it on
the FRA Web site and in the docket. The
General Passenger Safety Task Force
including the members of the System
Safety Task Group met on February 1–
2, 2012, and continued work on
finalizing the draft NPRM language. The
resulting NPRM was published on
September 7, 2012 (77 FR 55372), with
comments due by November 6, 2012. No
additional System Safety Task Group
meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Dan Knote, (631) 567–1596.
Task 05–01 Review of Roadway
Worker Protection Issues. This task was
accepted on January 26, 2005, to review
49 CFR part 214, subpart C, Roadway
Worker Protection (RWP), and related
sections of Subpart A; to recommend
consideration of specific actions to
advance the on-track safety of railroad
employees and contractors engaged in
maintenance-of-way activities
throughout the general system of
railroad transportation, including
clarification of existing requirements. A
working group was established and
reported any specific actions to the
RSAC that it identified as appropriate.
The first meeting of the working group
was held on April 12–14, 2005. Over the
course of 2 years, the group drafted and
reached consensus on regulatory
language for various revisions,
clarifications, and additions to 32
separate items in 19 sections of the rule.
However, two parties raised technical
concerns regarding one of those items,
namely, the draft language concerning
electronic display of track authorities.
The working group presented and
received approval on all of its consensus
recommendations for draft rule text to
the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. FRA will address the issue of
electronic display of track authorities,
along with eight additional items that
the working group was unable to reach
consensus, through the traditional
NPRM process. In early 2008, the
external working group members were
solicited to review the consensus rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
text for errata review. In order to
address the heightened concerns raised
with the current regulations for
adjacent-track, on-track safety, FRA
decided to issue, on an accelerated
basis, a separate NPRM that would
solely focus on this element of the RWP
rule. An NPRM with an abbreviated
comment period regarding adjacenttrack, on-track safety was published on
July 17, 2008, but was later withdrawn
on August 13, 2008, to permit further
consideration of the RSAC consensus
language. A second NPRM concerning
adjacent-controlled-track, on-track
safety was published on November 25,
2009, and comments were due to the
docket by January 25, 2010. Comments
were reviewed and considered by FRA,
and the final rule was published on
November 30, 2011 (76 FR 74586). In
response to the final rule, FRA received
two petitions for reconsideration that
raise a number of substantive issues
requiring a detailed response. A delay of
the effective date of the final rule and
a request for comments was published
on March 8, 2012 (77 FR 13978). This
document delays the effective date of
the final rule until July 1, 2013, and
establishes a 60-day comment period in
order to permit interested parties an
opportunity to respond to the submitted
petitions for reconsideration. FRA
received five comments on the petitions,
some of which raise additional
substantive issues or provide further
detailed information on the issues
already raised. The petitions and
comments on the petitions are available
for review in the docket for this
rulemaking, and have been assigned
identification numbers of FRA–2008–
0059–0031 and FRA–2008–0059–0032,
for the petitions, and identification
numbers of FRA–2008–0059–0034,
FRA–2008–0059–0035, FRA–2008–
0059–0036, FRA–2008–0059–0037, and
FRA–2008–0059–0038, for the
comments on the petitions. Due to the
complex issues raised and extensive
estimates provided in the petitions and
comments, FRA continues to formulate
an appropriate response. FRA’s
response to the petitions and comments
will be published as soon as practicable
and will be filed in the same docket.
The remaining larger NPRM relating
to the various revisions, clarifications,
and additions to 31 separate items in 19
sections of the rule, and FRA’s
recommendations for 9 nonconsensus
items was published on August 20, 2012
(77 FR 50324), with comments due by
October 19, 2012. Contact: Joe Riley,
(202) 493–6357.
Task 05–02—Reduce Human FactorCaused Train Accident/Incidents. This
task was accepted on May 18, 2005, to
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58611
reduce the number of human factorcaused train accidents/incidents and
related employee injuries. The Railroad
Operating Rules Working Group was
formed, and the working group
extensively reviewed the issues
presented. The final working group
meeting devoted to developing a
proposed rule was held on February 8–
9, 2006. The working group was not able
to deliver a consensus regulatory
proposal, but it did recommend that it
be used to review comments on FRA’s
NPRM, which was published in the
Federal Register on October 12, 2006
(FR 71 60372), with public comments
due by December 11, 2006. Two reviews
were held, one on February 8–9, 2007,
and one on April 4–5, 2007. Consensus
was reached on four items and those
items were presented and accepted by
the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. A final rule was published in
the Federal Register on February 13,
2008 (73 FR 8442), with an effective
date of April 14, 2008. FRA received
four petitions for reconsideration of that
final rule. The final rule that responded
to the petitions for consideration was
published in the Federal Register on
June 16, 2008, and concluded the
rulemaking. Working group meetings
were held September 27–28, 2007;
January 17–18, 2008; May 21–22, 2008;
and September 25–26, 2008. The
working group has considered issues
related to issuance of Emergency Order
No. 26 (prohibition on use of certain
electronic devices while on duty), and
‘‘after arrival mandatory directives,’’
among other issues. The working group
continues to work on after arrival orders
and, at the September 25–26, 2008,
meeting, voted to create a Highway-Rail
Grade Crossing Task Force to review
highway-rail grade crossing accident
reports regarding incidents of grade
crossing warning systems providing
‘‘short or no warning’’ resulting from or
contributed to ‘‘by train operational
issues’’ with the intent to recommend
new accident/incident reporting codes
that would better explain such events,
and which may provide information for
remedial action going forward. A
followup task is to review and provide
recommendations regarding
supplementary reporting of train
operations-related, no-warning or shortwarning incidents that are not
technically warning system activation
failures, but that result in an accident/
incident or a near miss. The task force
has been formed and will begin work
after other RSIA priorities are met.
Contact: Douglas Taylor, (202) 493–
6255.
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58612
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
Task 06–01—Locomotive Safety
Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2006, to review 49 CFR
part 229, Railroad Locomotive Safety
Standards, and revise as appropriate. A
working group was established with the
mandate to report any planned activities
to the full Committee at each scheduled
full RSAC meeting, to include
milestones for completion of projects
and progress toward completion. The
first working group meeting was held
May 8–10, 2006. Working group
meetings were held on August 8–9,
2006; September 25–26, 2006; October
30–31, 2006; and the working group
presented recommendations regarding
revisions to requirements for locomotive
sanders to the full RSAC on September
21, 2006. The NPRM regarding sanders
was published in the Federal Register
on March 6, 2007 (72 FR 9904).
Comments received were discussed by
the working group for clarification, and
FRA published a final rule on October
19, 2007 (72 FR 59216). The working
group met on January 9–10, 2007;
November 27–28, 2007; February 5–6,
2008; May 20–21, 2008; August 5–6,
2008; October 22–23, 2008; January 6–
7, 2009; and April 15–16, 2009. The
working group has now completed the
review of 49 CFR part 229 and was
unable to reach consensus regarding
locomotive cab temperatures standards,
locomotive alerters, and remote control
locomotives. The group reached
consensus regarding critical locomotive
electronic standards, updated annual/
biennial air brake standards,
clarification of the ‘‘air brakes operate as
intended’’ requirement, locomotive pilot
clearance within hump classification
yards, clarification of the ‘‘high voltage’’
warning requirement, an update of
‘‘headlight lamp’’ requirements, and
language to allow locomotive records to
be stored electronically. The working
group presented a 49 CFR part 229 draft
rule text revision covering these items to
the RSAC for consideration at the
September 10, 2009, meeting and
received approval. The NPRM was
delayed due to competing RSIA
priorities and the need for additional
language. This rulemaking would
amend the rules pertaining to the
Locomotive Safety Standards. The
proposed amendments would update,
consolidate, and clarify existing rules,
and adopt existing industry and
engineering best practices. The
proposed amendments include:
updating locomotive inspection
recordkeeping requirements by
permitting electronic records;
consolidating locomotive air brake
maintenance into a single provision;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
clarifying locomotive headlight
requirements to address new
technology; and, establishing
locomotive electronics standards based
on existing industry and engineering
best practices, as well as other existing
Federal electronics standards. This
action was taken by FRA in an effort to
improve its safety regulator program.
The NPRM was published on January
12, 2011 (76 FR 2200), and the final rule
was published on April 9, 2012 (77 FR
21312), and a correction to the final rule
was published on April 18, 2012 (77 FR
23159). Contact: Steve Clay, (202) 493–
6259.
Task 06–03—Medical Standards for
Safety-Critical Personnel. This task was
accepted on September 21, 2006, to
enhance the safety of persons in the
railroad operating environment and the
public by establishing standards and
procedures for determining the medical
fitness for duty of personnel engaged in
safety-critical functions. A working
group was established by the full RSAC
and reports its activities and progress
toward completion of this task to the
full RSAC during each meeting of the
full RSAC. The first working group
meeting was held on December 12–13,
2006, and the working group has held
follow-on meetings on February 20–21,
2007; July 24–25, 2007; August 29–30,
2007; October 31–November 1, 2007;
December 4–5, 2007; February 13–14,
2008; March 26–27, 2008; April 22–23,
2008; December 8–9, 2009; February 16–
17, 2010; March 11–12, 2010; May 24–
26, 2010; August 31–September 1, 2010;
November 18–19, 2010; and September
27–28, 2011. During the working
group’s September 2011 meeting, the
working group discussed stakeholder
positions on the draft rule text and draft
medical qualification criteria and
protocols, and a preliminary cost-benefit
analysis was presented to the working
group by the FRA economists. The
working group tentatively agreed to
proceed to revise its draft
recommendations to include a proposed
option that the medical qualification
criteria be issued as medical
qualification guidelines rather than
standards. The working group
established a task force to draft
proposed revisions to working draft
documents to be presented to the
working group for review and comment.
The next working group meeting has not
currently been scheduled due to other
priority RSIA projects. Contact: Dr.
Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Physicians Task Force. A Physicians
Task Force was established by the
working group in May 2007, and tasked
to draft recommended medical
qualification criteria and protocols for
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
locomotive engineers and conductors.
The Physicians Task Force had meetings
or conference calls on July 24, 2007;
August 20, 2007; October 15, 2007;
October 31, 2007; June 23–24, 2008;
September 8–10, 2008; October 8, 2008;
November 12–13, 2008; December 8–10,
2008; January 27–28, 2009; February
24–25, 2009; March 11–12, 2009; March
31–April 1, 2009; April 15, 2009; April
22, 2009; May 13, 2009; May 20, 2009;
June 17, 2009; January 21–22, 2010;
March 3, 2010; August 16–17, 2010; and
October 25–26, 2010; December 17,
2010; January 11, 2011; March 3–4,
2011; May 16–17, 2011; August 18,
2011; August 25, 2011; August 31, 2011.
On September 1, 2011, the task force
notified working group members that it
had made significant progress in
completing its task and requested that
the working group participate in
clarifying a limited number of
remaining operational issues relevant to
the task that merited review by industry
management, labor, and other
stakeholders. No further meetings of the
Physicians Task Force are currently
scheduled. Contact: Dr. Bernard
Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Critical Incident Task Force. The
Medical Standards Working Group
accepted RSAC Task 2009–02, Critical
Incident Response, during the December
8–9, 2010, meeting. The working group
has been tasked to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for critical incident stress
plans as required by the RSIA. A Critical
Incident Task Force was established
during the May 24–26, 2010, Medical
Standards Working Group meeting. The
scheduled kickoff meeting for the
Critical Incident Task Force scheduled
for September 2, 2010, was postponed at
the request of industry participants. In
late March 2011, FRA leadership
decided to request that the RSAC be
asked to amend the Critical Incident
task statement to remove reference to
the Medical Standards Working Group
and to allow the group to assume full
working group status to expedite the
work. The Committee approved the
revised task statement with a target date
for recommendations to the Committee
of December 2011, and the task force
transitioned to the Critical Incident
Working Group. (See Critical Incident
Working Group entry.) Contact: Dr.
Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Task 08–03—Track Safety Standards
Rail Integrity. This task was accepted on
September 10, 2008, to consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety
Standards or other responsive actions
designed to enhance rail integrity. The
Rail Integrity Task Force was created in
October 2007 under Task 07–01 and
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
first met on November 28–29, 2007. The
task force met on February 12–13, 2008;
April 15–16, 2008; July 8–9, 2008;
September 16–17, 2008; February 3–4,
2009; June 16–17, 2009; October 29–30,
2009; January 20–21, 2010; March 9–11,
2010; and April 20, 2010. Consensus has
been achieved on bond wires and a
common understanding on internal rail
flaw inspections has been reached. The
task force has reached consensus to
recommend to the working group that
the item regarding ‘‘the effect of rail
head wear, surface conditions and other
relevant factors on the acquisition and
interpretation of internal rail flaw test
results’’ be closed. The task force does
not recommend regulatory action
concerning head wear. Surface
conditions and their affect on test
integrity has been discussed and
understood during dialogue concerning
common understanding on internal rail
flaw inspections. The task force believes
that new technology has been developed
that improves test performance and will
impact the affect of head wear and
surface conditions on interpretation of
internal rail flaw test results. Consensus
text was developed on recommended
changes that would approach a
performance-based approach to flaw
detection scheduling. However, the
group did not reach consensus on what
length of segment of track is practical to
use on determining test cycles.
Consensus text has been finalized for
recommended changes to 49 CFR
213.113, Defective rails; 213.237, Rail
inspection; and 213.241, Inspection
records. The task force has developed a
new 49 CFR 213.238, Qualified operator
language, that defines the minimum
requirements for the training of a rail
flaw detector car operator. The task
force presented the consensus language
to the Track Standards Working Group
during the July 28–30, 2010, meeting
and the Track Standards Working Group
presented its consensus
recommendations to the RSAC for
approval during the September 23,
2010, Committee meeting. By majority
vote, the RSAC accepted the
recommendations of the Track
Standards Working Group and
forwarded those recommendations to
the Administrator, completing RSAC
Task 08–03. The associated NPRM is
currently in the final stages of
development with anticipated target
publication date of September 2012.
RSAC Task 08–03 will be complete once
the final rule is issued. Contact: Carlo
Patrick, (202) 493–6399.
Task No. 09–02—Critical Incident
Programs. This task was accepted on
September 10, 2009, to provide advice
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
regarding development of implementing
regulations for Critical Incident Stress
Plans as required by the RSIA. The
group has been tasked to define what a
‘‘critical incident’’ is that requires a
response; review available data,
literature, and standards of practice
concerning critical incident programs to
determine appropriate action when a
railroad employee is involved in or
directly witnesses a critical incident;
review any evaluation studies available
for existing railroad critical incident
programs; describe program elements
appropriate for the rail environment,
including those requirements set forth
in the RSIA; provide an example of a
suitable plan (template); and assist in
the preparation of an NPRM no later
than December 2010. In late March
2011, FRA leadership requested that the
RSAC amend the Critical Incident task
statement to remove reference to the
Medical Standards Working Group and
to allow the group to assume full
working group status to expedite the
work. The Committee approved the
revised task statement with a target date
for recommendations to the Committee
of December 2011. The Critical Incident
Working Group kickoff meeting was
held on June 24, 2011. The draft report
assessing current knowledge of posttraumatic interventions and to advance
evidence-based recommendations for
controlling the risks associated with
traumatic exposure in the railroad
setting was completed and distributed
to the working group prior to the
September 8–9, 2011, working group
meeting. Due to the aggressive timeline,
the working group held its second
meeting on October 11–12, 2011, and
held a follow-on meeting December 13,
2011. The grantee provided a report
titled ‘‘Proposed Key Elements of
Critical Incident Intervention Program
for Reducing the Effects of Potentially
Traumatic Exposure on Train Crews to
Grade Crossing and Trespasser
Incidents’’ to the Critical Incident
Working Group on December 13, 2011.
The Critical Incident Working Group
approved draft proposed rule text by
electronic vote on August 20, 2012, and
will present its recommendations to the
RSAC Committee for vote during the
September 27, 2012, meeting. Contact:
Ron Hynes, (202) 493–6404.
Task No. 10–01—Minimum Training
Standards and Plans. This task was
accepted on March 18, 2010, to establish
minimum training standards for each
class and craft of safety-related railroad
employees and their railroad contractor
and subcontractor equivalents, as
required by the RSIA. The group has
been tasked to assist FRA in developing
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58613
regulations responsive to the legislative
mandate, while ensuring that generally
accepted principles of adult learning are
employed in training, development, and
delivery; determine a reasonable
method for submission and FRA review
of training plans, which takes human
resource limitations into account;
establish reasonable oversight criteria to
ensure training plans are effective, using
the operational tests and inspections
requirements of 49 CFR part 217 as a
model. The Training Standards Working
Group was officially formed through the
formal Committee member nomination
process in March 2010, and the first
meeting was held on April 13–14, 2010.
A followup working group meeting was
held on June 2–3, 2010, and additional
followup meetings were held August
17–18, 2010, and September 21–22,
2010. A Task Analysis Task Force was
formed under the working group to
develop a task analysis template and
met in Florence, KY, on June 22–23,
2010, with CSX Transportation hosting
the event. The group developed a 21page task analysis document for an
outbound train yard carman position,
which is complete regarding FRA
railroad safety laws, regulations, and
orders. The working group met August
17–18, 2010, and October 19–20, 2010,
and by GoTo/Webinar on November 15–
16, 2010. The working group reached
consensus and the resulting training
standards draft regulatory language was
presented to and approved by the RSAC
Committee on December 14, 2010. This
rulemaking will (1) Establish minimum
training standards for each class or craft
of safety-related employee and
equivalent railroad contractor and
subcontractor employee that require
railroads, contractors, and
subcontractors to qualify or otherwise
document the proficiency of such
employees in each such class and craft
regarding their knowledge and ability to
comply with Federal railroad safety
laws and regulations and railroad rules
and procedures intended to implement
those laws and regulations; (2) require
submission of railroads, contractors, and
subcontractors’’ training and
qualification programs for FRA
approval; and (3) establish a minimum
training curriculum and ongoing
training criteria, testing, and skills
evaluation measures for track and
equipment inspectors employed by
railroads and railroad contractor and
subcontractors. The resulting NPRM
was published February 7, 2012 (77 FR
6411), with comments on the proposed
rule due by April 9, 2012. The target
publication date for the final rule is
March 2013 and this rulemaking is
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58614
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
categorized as a modal priority. No
additional working group meetings are
scheduled at this time. Contact: Rob
Castiglione, (817) 447–2715.
Task No. 10–02—Safety Technology
in Dark Territory. This task was
accepted on September 23, 2010, to
provide advice regarding development
of standards, guidance, regulations, or
orders governing the development, use,
and implementation of rail safety
technology in dark territory, as required
by Section 406 of the RSIA. Specifically,
the task was to assist FRA in developing
regulations responsive to the legislative
mandate and to report recommendations
to the FRA Administrator for a proposed
or interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with OST and
OMB) by September 30, 2011. This
rulemaking would issue standards or
guidance governing development and
deployment of technology to promote
safe operation in non-signaled territory
in arrangements not defined in signal
inspection law. The delay in starting
this effort was caused by the PTC
rulemaking, which required the same
key personnel both in government and
industry. With the PTC effort maturing,
resources became available and the Dark
Territory Working Group was formed to
assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate
and to report recommendations to the
FRA Administrator for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with OST and
OMB). The working group met on
March 3–4, 2011, May 9–10, 2011, and
September 6–7, 2011, and created four
task forces to investigate specific subject
areas. A follow-on meeting was held
November 17–18, 2011, and a proposed
rule is currently under development
with the assistance of the Dark Territory
Working Group. Target date for NPRM
publication is November 2012. Contact:
Olga Cataldi, (202) 493–6321.
Task No. 11–01—Preventing Railroad
Employee Distractions Caused by
Personal Electronic Devices. This task
was accepted on May 20, 2011, to
prescribe mitigation strategies,
programs, and processes for governing
the use of personal electronic devices
that could cause distractions to railroad
employees engaged in safety-critical
activities. This working group will
explore additional methods to achieve
compliance through education, peer-topeer coaching, counseling, and other
cooperative, non-regulatory/punitive
methods. The Electronic Device
Distraction Working Group was formed
and held its kickoff meeting on October
25–26, 2011, and held follow-on
meetings on January 11–12, 2012, and
March 27, 2012. Work on this task has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
progressed well and the working group
presented its recommendations to the
Committee during the April 2012 RSAC
meeting. As a result of the working
group’s efforts, FRA is producing an
outreach video, and FRA will
participate in an inclusive media event
with its partners in Chicago, IL, on
October 9, 2012. Contact: Miriam
Kloeppel, (202) 493–6224.
Task No. 11–03—Fatigue
Management Plans. This task was
accepted by the Committee on
December 8, 2011, to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for Fatigue Management
Plans and their deployment under the
RSIA. The working group was formed
and held its kickoff meeting on March
27, 2012. Follow-on meetings were held
June 12, 2012; July 10–11, 2012; and
August 28, 2012. Work continues on
this task and the working group is
tasked to report recommendations to the
Committee no later than February 2013.
Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493–
6224.
Task No. 11–04—Risk Reduction
Program. This task was accepted by the
Committee on December 8, 2011, in
order to develop requirements for
certain railroads to develop a Risk
Reduction Program as mandated by the
RSIA. The working group was formed
and held its kickoff meeting on January
31–February 1, 2012, and follow-on
meetings were held April 10–11, 2012;
May 16–17, 2012; June 13, 2012; June
25, 2012; and July 18, 2012. The
working group has made considerable
progress, and no further working group
meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493–
6224.
Completed Tasks
Task 96–1—(Completed) Revising the
freight power brake regulations.
Task 96–2—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to the
Track Safety Standards (49 CFR part
213).
Task 96–3—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to the
Radio Standards and Procedures (49
CFR part 220).
Task 96–5—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to Steam
Locomotive Inspection Standards (49
CFR part 230).
Task 96–6—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to
miscellaneous aspects of the regulations
addressing locomotive engineer
certification (49 CFR part 240).
Task 96–7—(Completed) Developing
roadway maintenance machines (ontrack equipment) safety standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Task 96–8—(Completed) Evaluating
the need for action responsive to
recommendations contained in a report
to Congress titled, Locomotive
Crashworthiness & Working Conditions.
Task 97–1—(Completed) Developing
crashworthiness specifications (49 CFR
part 229) to promote the integrity of the
locomotive cabs in accidents resulting
from collisions.
Task 97–2—(Completed) Evaluating
the extent to which environmental,
sanitary, and other working conditions
in locomotive cabs affect the crew’s
health and the safe operation of
locomotives, proposing standards where
appropriate.
Task 97–3—(Completed) Developing
event recorder data survivability
standards.
Task 97–4 and Task 97–5—
(Completed) Defining PTC
functionalities, describing available
technologies, evaluating costs and
benefits of potential systems, and
considering implementation
opportunities and challenges, including
demonstration and deployment.
Task 97–6—(Completed) Revising
various regulations to address the safety
implications of processor-based signal
and train control technologies,
including communications-based
operating systems.
Task 97–7—(Completed) Determining
damages qualifying an event as a
reportable train accident.
Task 00–01—(Completed task
withdrawn) Determining the need to
amend regulations protecting persons
who work on, under, or between rolling
equipment and persons applying,
removing, or inspecting rear end
marking devices (Blue Signal
Protection).
Task 01–01—(Completed) Developing
conformity of FRA’s regulations for
accident/incident reporting (49 CFR part
225) to revised regulations of the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, and to make appropriate
revisions to the FRA Guide for
Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
(Reporting Guide).
Task 03–01—Mechanical Task
Force—(Completed) Developing
recommendations on mechanical issues
(revisions to 49 CFR part 238).
Task 03–01—Crashworthiness Task
Force—(Completed) Providing
consensus recommendations on staticend strength.
Task 06–02—(Completed) Issuing
requirements for inspection of joint bars
in continuous welded rail (CWR) to
detect cracks that could affect the
integrity of the track structure.
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 184 / Friday, September 21, 2012 / Notices
Task 07–01—(Completed)
Considering specific improvements to
the Track Safety Standards or other
responsive actions, supplementing work
already underway on CWR specific to:
reviewing controls applied to the reuse
of rail in CWR ‘‘plug rail’’; reviewing the
issue of cracks emanating from bond
wire attachments; considering
improvements in the Track Safety
Standards related to fastening of rail to
concrete ties; and ensuring a common
understanding within the regulated
community concerning requirements for
internal rail flaw inspections.
Task 08–01—(Completed) Reporting
on the Nation’s railroad bridges.
Reporting to FRA on the current state of
railroad bridge safety management;
updating the findings and conclusions
of the 1993 Summary Report of the FRA
Railroad Bridge Safety Survey.
Task No. 08–04—(Completed)
Providing advice regarding development
of implementing regulations for PTC
systems and their deployment under the
RSIA.
Task No. 08–05—(Completed)
Developing a rule encompassing the
requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA
(Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance).
Task No. 08–06—(Completed)
Developing revised recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for hours of
service of railroad employees.
Task No. 08–07—(Completed)
Developing regulations for certification
of railroad conductors, as required by
the RSIA, and considering any
appropriate related amendments to
existing regulations and reporting
recommendations for a proposed or
interim final rule.
Task No. 09–01—(Completed)
Providing advice regarding development
of implementing regulations for the
hours of service of operating employees
of commuter and intercity passenger
railroads under the RSIA.
Task No. 11–02—(Completed)
Considering specific improvements to
the Track Safety Standards or other
responsive actions related to the Track
Inspection Time Study required by
Sections 403 (a)–(c) of the of the RSIA
and other relevant studies and
resources.
Please refer to the notice published in
the Federal Register on March 11, 1996
(61 FR 9740), for more information
about the RSAC.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
17, 2012.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–23305 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Sep 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2001–10654]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated July 26,
2012, the Association of American
Railroads (AAR) has petitioned the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
for an extension and amendment of an
existing waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of the Federal
railroad safety regulations contained at
49 CFR 213.143 and 213.355. FRA
assigned the petition Docket Number
FRA–2001–10654.
The existing waiver was originally
granted on April 22, 2003, and was
extended by a letter dated February 25,
2008. The current waiver expires on
February 1, 2013. AAR is petitioning for
an additional extension of the waiver.
The waiver permits the operation of
trains at Class 5 speeds over ‘‘heavypoint’’ frog designs conforming to the
standards for Class 4 track frogs guard
check and face gage dimensions.
The heavy-point frog is a unique
design, which has a thicker frog point.
As proposed in the original waiver
petition, AAR states that it offers safety
benefits over a traditional frog because
there is more mass to reduce metal
fatigue from impact loading, greater
durability, reduced susceptibility to
point rollover, and better ability to
guide the wheel flange toward the
proper flangeway. Heavy-point frog
insert design characteristics gradually
widen to 31⁄32 (0.9688) inches overall,
resulting in the heavy-point frog insert
point being thicker at the actual 5⁄8
(0.6250)-inch frog point gage lines. The
gage line is actually 11⁄32 (0.3438) inches
thicker than a traditional 5⁄8 (0.6250)inch rail bound manganese frog point.
Heavy-point frogs reduce the standard
guard check distance from 4 feet and 6k
inches (54.6250 inches) to 4 feet 629/64
inches (54.4531 inches), which does not
comply with minimum safety standards
for Class 5 track.
AAR also seeks approval for the
operation of trains at Class 6 speeds
over heavy-point frog designs with
guard check gages conforming to the
standards for Class 4 track frogs guard
check and face gage dimensions. AAR
states that waiver denial would
adversely affect proposed high-speed
operations that have numerous existing
heavy-point frog installations. AAR
claims that since the requirements are
the same for Class 5 and Class 6 (49 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
58615
213.143 and 213.355), the waiver should
be extended to Class 6.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by October
22, 2012 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78), or
online at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
17, 2012.
Ron Hynes,
Director, Office of Safety Assurance and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012–23270 Filed 9–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58608-58615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23305]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA-2000-7257; Notice No. 71]
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC); Working Group Activity
Update
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Announcement of Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Working Group Activities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FRA is updating its announcement of the RSAC Working Group
activities to reflect its current status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Woolverton, RSAC Designated
Federal Officer/Administrative Officer, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6212; or Robert
Lauby, Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mailstop 25, Washington,
DC 20590, (202) 493-6474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice serves to update FRA's last
announcement of working group activities and status reports of April
23, 2012 (77 FR 24257). The 46th full RSAC meeting was held on April
26, 2012, and the 47th meeting is scheduled for September 27, 2012, at
the National Association of Home Builders, National Housing Center,
located at 1201 15th Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Since its first meeting in April 1996, the RSAC has accepted 38
tasks. Status for each of the open tasks (neither completed nor
terminated) is provided below:
Open Tasks
Task 96-4--Tourist and Historic Railroads. Reviewing the
appropriateness of the agency's current policy regarding the
applicability of existing and proposed regulations to tourist,
excursion, scenic, and historic railroads. This task was accepted on
April 2, 1996, and a working group was established. The working group
monitored the steam locomotive regulation task. Planned future
activities involve the review of other regulations for possible
adaptation to the safety needs of tourist and historic railroads.
Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493-6474.
Task 03-01--Passenger Safety. This task includes updating and
enhancing the regulations pertaining to passenger
[[Page 58609]]
safety, based on research and experience. This task was accepted on May
20, 2003, and a working group was established. Prior to embarking on
substantive discussions of a specific task, the working group set forth
in writing a specific description of the task. The working group
reports planned activities to the full RSAC at each scheduled full RSAC
meeting, including milestones for completion of projects and progress
toward completion. At the first meeting, held on September 9-10, 2003,
a consolidated list of issues was completed. At the second meeting,
held on November 6-7, 2003, four task groups were established:
Emergency Preparedness, Mechanical, Crashworthiness, and Vehicle/Track
Interaction. The task forces met and reported on activities for working
group consideration at the third meeting, held on May 11-12, 2004, and
a fourth meeting was held on October 26-27, 2004. The working group met
on March 21-22, 2006, and again on September 12-13, 2006, at which time
the group agreed to establish a task force on General Passenger Safety.
The full Passenger Safety Working Group met on April 17-18, 2007;
December 11-12, 2007; November 13, 2008; and June 8, 2009. On August 5,
2009, the working group was requested to establish an Engineering Task
Force (ETF) to consider technical criteria and procedures for
qualifying alternative passenger equipment designs as equivalent in
safety to equipment meeting the design standards in the Passenger
Equipment Safety Standards. Consensus Tier III recommendations of the
ETF were developed and were approved at a meeting on October 6-7, 2011,
by the Passenger Safety Working Group, and these recommendations were
approved by the full RSAC Committee by electronic vote on March 2,
2012. These recommendations address safety issues related to high-speed
rail trainsets used in the United States. No additional meetings are
currently scheduled.
Contact: Charles Bielitz, (202) 493-6314.
Engineering Task Force. The Passenger Safety Working Group approved
a request from FRA to establish an ETF under the Passenger Safety
Working Group in August 2009. The mission of the task force is to
produce a set of technical evaluation criteria and procedures for
passenger rail equipment built to alternative designs. The technical
evaluation criteria and procedures would provide a means of
establishing whether an alternative design would result in performance
at least equal to the structural design standards set forth in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards (Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 238). The initial focus of this effort will be
on Tier I standards. When completed, the criteria and procedures would
form a technical basis for making determinations concerning equivalent
safety pursuant to 49 CFR Section 238.201, and provide a technical
framework for presenting evidence to FRA in support of any request for
waiver of the compressive (buff) strength requirement, as set forth in
49 CFR 238.203. See 49 CFR part 211, Rules of Practice. The criteria
and procedures could be incorporated into Part 238 at a later date
after notice and opportunity for public comment. The ETF was formed and
a kickoff meeting was held on September 23-24, 2009. The group held
follow-on meetings November 3-4, 2009; January 7-8, 2010; and March 9-
10, 2010. A followup GoTo/Webinar meeting was held on July 12, 2010.
The ETF developed a draft ``Criteria and Procedures Report'' that was
approved by the Passenger Safety Working Group during the September 16,
2010, meeting and by the RSAC Committee during the September 23, 2010,
meeting. The document has been placed on the FRA Web site at the
following address: https://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/RSAC_REPORT-%209-16-10.pdf.
Engineering Task Force II. In order to build on the success of the
ETF in developing a set of alternative technical criteria and
procedures for evaluating the crashworthiness and occupant protection
performance of passenger rail equipment in service at conventional
operating speeds, FRA requested that the Passenger Safety Working Group
re-task the group to concentrate on developing crashworthiness and
occupant protection safety recommendations for high-speed passenger
trains. The Passenger Safety Working Group accepted the task on July
28, 2010, by electronic vote. Under the new task, the task force may
address any safety features of the equipment, including but not limited
to crashworthiness, interior occupant protection, glazing, emergency
egress, and fire safety features. Any type of equipment may be
addressed, including conventional locomotives, high-speed power cars,
cab cars, multiple-unit (MU) locomotives, and coach cars. The equipment
addressed may be used in any type of passenger service, from
conventional-speed to high-speed. Recommendations may take the form of
criteria and procedures, revisions to existing regulations, or adoption
of new regulations, including rules of particular applicability. The
work of the re-tasked ETF is intended to assist FRA in developing
appropriate safety standards for the high-speed rail projects planned
in California and Nevada. The ETF II held a kickoff meeting on October
21-22, 2010, to begin work on the new high-speed task, and had follow-
on meetings on January 11-12, February 14-15, March 30-31, June 16-17,
October 6-7, 2011; and June 27-28, 2012. Consensus Tier III
recommendations of the ETF were developed and were accepted by vote
during the meeting on October 6-7, 2011. The ETF II formed three
additional Task Groups to work in the areas of track worthiness and
brakes.
The Track Worthiness Task Group is tasked to identify potential
safety issues related to operation of high-speed trainsets on
conventional track and to make recommendations on how best to mitigate
any consequences. The Task Group includes experts and key stakeholders
such as international operators of high-speed equipment, car builders,
wheel/rail interaction dynamics specialists, and other RSAC working
group members involved in vehicle/track interaction.
The Brakes Task Group is tasked to review braking system
requirements and international braking system requirements versus
existing U.S. requirements including inspection and maintenance and
identify common features, determine basic parameters, and consider use
of service proven braking systems. The Task Group will also consider
performance-based provisions and requirements with consideration for
operators to develop maintenance, inspection, and service plans, and
make recommendations regarding brakes to the ETF II as related to Tier
III.
The Engineering Structure and Integrity Task Group is tasked to
develop a document that outlines and describes procedures and processes
necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of applicable
Federal regulations and American Public Transportation Association
(APTA) standards for structural integrity and crashworthiness for
railroad passenger train sets. The next ETF meeting is scheduled for
September 2526, 2012. Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493-6474.
Emergency Preparedness Task Force. At the working group meeting on
March 9-10, 2005, the working group received and approved the consensus
report of the Emergency Preparedness Task Force related to emergency
communication,
[[Page 58610]]
emergency egress, and rescue access. These recommendations were
presented to and approved by the full RSAC on May 18, 2005. The working
group met on September 7-8, 2005, and additional, supplementary
recommendations were presented to and accepted by the full RSAC on
October 11, 2005. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was
published on August 24, 2006 (71 FR 50275), and was open for comment
until October 23, 2006. The working group agreed on recommendations for
the final rule, including resolution of final comments received, during
the April 17-18, 2007, meeting. The recommendations were presented to
and approved by the full RSAC on June 26, 2007. The Passenger Train
Emergency Systems final rule, focusing on emergency communication,
emergency egress, and rescue access, was published on February 1, 2008
(73 FR 6370). The task force met on October 17-18, 2007, and reached
consensus on the draft rule text for a followup NPRM on Passenger Train
Emergency Systems, focusing on low location emergency exit path
marking, emergency lighting, and emergency signage. The task force
presented the draft rule text to the Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 11-12, 2007, and the consensus draft rule text was presented
to and approved by full RSAC vote during the February 20, 2008,
meeting. During the May 13-14, 2008, meeting, the task force
recommended clarifying the applicability of back-up emergency
communication system requirements in the February 1, 2008, final rule,
and FRA announced its intention to exercise limited enforcement
discretion for a new provision amending instruction requirements for
emergency window exit removal. The working group ratified these
recommendations on June 19, 2008. The task force met again on March 31,
2009, to clarify issues raised by members related to the followup NPRM.
The modified rule text was presented to and approved by the Passenger
Safety Working Group on June 8, 2009. The working group requested that
FRA draft the rule text requiring daily inspection of removable panels
or windows in vestibule doors and entrust the Emergency Preparedness
Task Force with reviewing the text. FRA sent the draft text to the task
force for review and comment on August 4, 2009. The draft rule text was
approved by the Passenger Safety Working Group by mail ballot on
December 23, 2009, and the resultant NPRM was published January 3, 2012
(77 FR 154). No additional task force meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Brenda Moscoso, (202) 493-6282.
Vehicle/Track Interaction Task Force. The task force is developing
proposed revisions to 49 CFR parts 213 and 238, principally regarding
high-speed passenger service. The task force met on October 9-11, 2007,
and again on November 19-20, 2007, in Washington, DC, and presented the
final task force report and final recommendations and proposed rule
text for approval by the Passenger Safety Working Group at the December
11-12, 2007, meeting. The final report and the proposed rule text were
approved by the working group and were presented to and approved by
full RSAC vote during the February 20, 2008, meeting. The group met on
February 27-28, 2008, and by teleconference on March 18, 2010, to
address unresolved issues, and the NPRM was published on May 10, 2010
(75 FR 25928). The task force was called back into session on August 5-
6, 2010, to review and consider NPRM comments. The final rule will
amend the Track Safety Standards and Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards for high-speed train operations and train operations at high
cant deficiencies to promote the safe interaction of rail vehicles with
the track over which they operate. It will revise both the safety
limits for these operations and the process to qualify them. It
accounts for a range of vehicle types that are currently used and may
likely be used on future high-speed or high cant deficiency rail
operations, and would provide safety assurance for train operations in
all classes of track. It is based on the results of simulation studies
designed to identify track geometry irregularities associated with
unsafe wheel forces and acceleration, thorough reviews of vehicle
qualification and revenue service test data, and consideration of
international practices. The draft final rule was sent to the task
force for final consensus on November 11, 2011, and was approved by
electronic vote on November 21, 2011. The draft final rule was then
approved by electronic vote by the Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 12, 2011, and by the full RSAC Committee by electronic vote on
January 6, 2012. Target publication date of the final rule is September
2012. Contact: John Mardente, (202) 493-1335.
General Passenger Safety Task Force. At the Passenger Safety
Working Group meeting on April 17-18, 2007, the task force presented a
progress report to the working group. The task force met on July 18-19,
2007, and afterwards it reported proposed reporting cause codes for
injuries involving the platform gap, which were approved by the working
group by mail ballot in September 2007. The full RSAC approved the
recommendations for changes to 49 CFR part 225 accident/incident cause
codes on October 25, 2007. The General Passenger Safety Task Force
presented draft guidance material for management of the gap that was
considered and approved by the working group during the December 11-12,
2007, meeting and was presented to and approved by full RSAC vote
during the February 20, 2008, meeting. The group met April 23-24, 2008,
December 3-4, 2008, April 21-23, 2009, October 7-8, 2009, and July 30,
2010, by GoTo/Webinar teleconference. The task force continues work on
passenger train door securement, ``second train in station,''
trespasser incidents, and system safety-based solutions by developing a
regulatory approach to system safety. The task force has created two
task groups to focus on these issues.
The Door Safety Task Group has reached consensus on 47 out of 48
safety issues and had five items that have been remanded to the task
force for vote. The issues are addressed in the area of passenger train
door mechanical and operational requirements and presented draft
regulatory language to the Passenger Safety Working Group at the
September 16, 2010, meeting. More work remains to ensure the 49 CFR
part 238 door rule consensus document and the proposed APTA door
standard (APTA SS-M-18-10) uses uniform language. The document was
approved by the Passenger Safety Working Group by electronic vote on
March 31, 2011, and approved by the RSAC on May 20, 2011. This
rulemaking would amend the passenger equipment safety standards to
enhance safety standards as they relate to passenger door securement
while a passenger train is in service based on research and experiences
of FRA safety inspectors. Specifically, FRA would incorporate by
reference APTA standard: ``APTA SS-M-18-10 Standard for Powered
Exterior Side Door System Design for New Passenger Cars.'' A draft NPRM
is currently under development with a target publication date of
September 2012. No additional Door Task Group meetings are currently
scheduled. Contact: Brian Hontz, (610) 521-8220.
The System Safety Task Group has produced draft regulatory language
for a System Safety Rule, but work on this rulemaking was delayed until
a study of legal protections for Risk Reduction Program (RRP) and
System Safety Program (SSP) risk analysis data that is required by the
Rail Safety Improvement
[[Page 58611]]
Act of 2008 (RSIA) was completed. The System Safety rulemaking would
improve passenger railroad safety through structured, proactive
processes and procedures developed by passenger railroad operators. It
would require passenger railroads to establish an SSP that would
systematically evaluate and manage risks in order to reduce the number
and rates of railroad accidents, incidents, injuries, and fatalities.
FRA continued to work on a draft NPRM while waiting for the legal
review of protection of hazard analysis information, required by
Section 109 of the RSIA. The Office of Chief Counsel completed a legal
study and posted it on the FRA Web site and in the docket. The General
Passenger Safety Task Force including the members of the System Safety
Task Group met on February 1-2, 2012, and continued work on finalizing
the draft NPRM language. The resulting NPRM was published on September
7, 2012 (77 FR 55372), with comments due by November 6, 2012. No
additional System Safety Task Group meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Dan Knote, (631) 567-1596.
Task 05-01 Review of Roadway Worker Protection Issues. This task
was accepted on January 26, 2005, to review 49 CFR part 214, subpart C,
Roadway Worker Protection (RWP), and related sections of Subpart A; to
recommend consideration of specific actions to advance the on-track
safety of railroad employees and contractors engaged in maintenance-of-
way activities throughout the general system of railroad
transportation, including clarification of existing requirements. A
working group was established and reported any specific actions to the
RSAC that it identified as appropriate. The first meeting of the
working group was held on April 12-14, 2005. Over the course of 2
years, the group drafted and reached consensus on regulatory language
for various revisions, clarifications, and additions to 32 separate
items in 19 sections of the rule. However, two parties raised technical
concerns regarding one of those items, namely, the draft language
concerning electronic display of track authorities. The working group
presented and received approval on all of its consensus recommendations
for draft rule text to the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007, meeting. FRA
will address the issue of electronic display of track authorities,
along with eight additional items that the working group was unable to
reach consensus, through the traditional NPRM process. In early 2008,
the external working group members were solicited to review the
consensus rule text for errata review. In order to address the
heightened concerns raised with the current regulations for adjacent-
track, on-track safety, FRA decided to issue, on an accelerated basis,
a separate NPRM that would solely focus on this element of the RWP
rule. An NPRM with an abbreviated comment period regarding adjacent-
track, on-track safety was published on July 17, 2008, but was later
withdrawn on August 13, 2008, to permit further consideration of the
RSAC consensus language. A second NPRM concerning adjacent-controlled-
track, on-track safety was published on November 25, 2009, and comments
were due to the docket by January 25, 2010. Comments were reviewed and
considered by FRA, and the final rule was published on November 30,
2011 (76 FR 74586). In response to the final rule, FRA received two
petitions for reconsideration that raise a number of substantive issues
requiring a detailed response. A delay of the effective date of the
final rule and a request for comments was published on March 8, 2012
(77 FR 13978). This document delays the effective date of the final
rule until July 1, 2013, and establishes a 60-day comment period in
order to permit interested parties an opportunity to respond to the
submitted petitions for reconsideration. FRA received five comments on
the petitions, some of which raise additional substantive issues or
provide further detailed information on the issues already raised. The
petitions and comments on the petitions are available for review in the
docket for this rulemaking, and have been assigned identification
numbers of FRA-2008-0059-0031 and FRA-2008-0059-0032, for the
petitions, and identification numbers of FRA-2008-0059-0034, FRA-2008-
0059-0035, FRA-2008-0059-0036, FRA-2008-0059-0037, and FRA-2008-0059-
0038, for the comments on the petitions. Due to the complex issues
raised and extensive estimates provided in the petitions and comments,
FRA continues to formulate an appropriate response. FRA's response to
the petitions and comments will be published as soon as practicable and
will be filed in the same docket.
The remaining larger NPRM relating to the various revisions,
clarifications, and additions to 31 separate items in 19 sections of
the rule, and FRA's recommendations for 9 nonconsensus items was
published on August 20, 2012 (77 FR 50324), with comments due by
October 19, 2012. Contact: Joe Riley, (202) 493-6357.
Task 05-02--Reduce Human Factor-Caused Train Accident/Incidents.
This task was accepted on May 18, 2005, to reduce the number of human
factor-caused train accidents/incidents and related employee injuries.
The Railroad Operating Rules Working Group was formed, and the working
group extensively reviewed the issues presented. The final working
group meeting devoted to developing a proposed rule was held on
February 8-9, 2006. The working group was not able to deliver a
consensus regulatory proposal, but it did recommend that it be used to
review comments on FRA's NPRM, which was published in the Federal
Register on October 12, 2006 (FR 71 60372), with public comments due by
December 11, 2006. Two reviews were held, one on February 8-9, 2007,
and one on April 4-5, 2007. Consensus was reached on four items and
those items were presented and accepted by the full RSAC at the June
26, 2007, meeting. A final rule was published in the Federal Register
on February 13, 2008 (73 FR 8442), with an effective date of April 14,
2008. FRA received four petitions for reconsideration of that final
rule. The final rule that responded to the petitions for consideration
was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2008, and concluded
the rulemaking. Working group meetings were held September 27-28, 2007;
January 17-18, 2008; May 21-22, 2008; and September 25-26, 2008. The
working group has considered issues related to issuance of Emergency
Order No. 26 (prohibition on use of certain electronic devices while on
duty), and ``after arrival mandatory directives,'' among other issues.
The working group continues to work on after arrival orders and, at the
September 25-26, 2008, meeting, voted to create a Highway-Rail Grade
Crossing Task Force to review highway-rail grade crossing accident
reports regarding incidents of grade crossing warning systems providing
``short or no warning'' resulting from or contributed to ``by train
operational issues'' with the intent to recommend new accident/incident
reporting codes that would better explain such events, and which may
provide information for remedial action going forward. A followup task
is to review and provide recommendations regarding supplementary
reporting of train operations-related, no-warning or short-warning
incidents that are not technically warning system activation failures,
but that result in an accident/incident or a near miss. The task force
has been formed and will begin work after other RSIA priorities are
met. Contact: Douglas Taylor, (202) 493-6255.
[[Page 58612]]
Task 06-01--Locomotive Safety Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2006, to review 49 CFR part 229, Railroad Locomotive
Safety Standards, and revise as appropriate. A working group was
established with the mandate to report any planned activities to the
full Committee at each scheduled full RSAC meeting, to include
milestones for completion of projects and progress toward completion.
The first working group meeting was held May 8-10, 2006. Working group
meetings were held on August 8-9, 2006; September 25-26, 2006; October
30-31, 2006; and the working group presented recommendations regarding
revisions to requirements for locomotive sanders to the full RSAC on
September 21, 2006. The NPRM regarding sanders was published in the
Federal Register on March 6, 2007 (72 FR 9904). Comments received were
discussed by the working group for clarification, and FRA published a
final rule on October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59216). The working group met on
January 9-10, 2007; November 27-28, 2007; February 5-6, 2008; May 20-
21, 2008; August 5-6, 2008; October 22-23, 2008; January 6-7, 2009; and
April 15-16, 2009. The working group has now completed the review of 49
CFR part 229 and was unable to reach consensus regarding locomotive cab
temperatures standards, locomotive alerters, and remote control
locomotives. The group reached consensus regarding critical locomotive
electronic standards, updated annual/biennial air brake standards,
clarification of the ``air brakes operate as intended'' requirement,
locomotive pilot clearance within hump classification yards,
clarification of the ``high voltage'' warning requirement, an update of
``headlight lamp'' requirements, and language to allow locomotive
records to be stored electronically. The working group presented a 49
CFR part 229 draft rule text revision covering these items to the RSAC
for consideration at the September 10, 2009, meeting and received
approval. The NPRM was delayed due to competing RSIA priorities and the
need for additional language. This rulemaking would amend the rules
pertaining to the Locomotive Safety Standards. The proposed amendments
would update, consolidate, and clarify existing rules, and adopt
existing industry and engineering best practices. The proposed
amendments include: updating locomotive inspection recordkeeping
requirements by permitting electronic records; consolidating locomotive
air brake maintenance into a single provision; clarifying locomotive
headlight requirements to address new technology; and, establishing
locomotive electronics standards based on existing industry and
engineering best practices, as well as other existing Federal
electronics standards. This action was taken by FRA in an effort to
improve its safety regulator program. The NPRM was published on January
12, 2011 (76 FR 2200), and the final rule was published on April 9,
2012 (77 FR 21312), and a correction to the final rule was published on
April 18, 2012 (77 FR 23159). Contact: Steve Clay, (202) 493-6259.
Task 06-03--Medical Standards for Safety-Critical Personnel. This
task was accepted on September 21, 2006, to enhance the safety of
persons in the railroad operating environment and the public by
establishing standards and procedures for determining the medical
fitness for duty of personnel engaged in safety-critical functions. A
working group was established by the full RSAC and reports its
activities and progress toward completion of this task to the full RSAC
during each meeting of the full RSAC. The first working group meeting
was held on December 12-13, 2006, and the working group has held
follow-on meetings on February 20-21, 2007; July 24-25, 2007; August
29-30, 2007; October 31-November 1, 2007; December 4-5, 2007; February
13-14, 2008; March 26-27, 2008; April 22-23, 2008; December 8-9, 2009;
February 16-17, 2010; March 11-12, 2010; May 24-26, 2010; August 31-
September 1, 2010; November 18-19, 2010; and September 27-28, 2011.
During the working group's September 2011 meeting, the working group
discussed stakeholder positions on the draft rule text and draft
medical qualification criteria and protocols, and a preliminary cost-
benefit analysis was presented to the working group by the FRA
economists. The working group tentatively agreed to proceed to revise
its draft recommendations to include a proposed option that the medical
qualification criteria be issued as medical qualification guidelines
rather than standards. The working group established a task force to
draft proposed revisions to working draft documents to be presented to
the working group for review and comment. The next working group
meeting has not currently been scheduled due to other priority RSIA
projects. Contact: Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Physicians Task Force. A Physicians Task Force was established by
the working group in May 2007, and tasked to draft recommended medical
qualification criteria and protocols for locomotive engineers and
conductors. The Physicians Task Force had meetings or conference calls
on July 24, 2007; August 20, 2007; October 15, 2007; October 31, 2007;
June 23-24, 2008; September 8-10, 2008; October 8, 2008; November 12-
13, 2008; December 8-10, 2008; January 27-28, 2009; February 24-25,
2009; March 11-12, 2009; March 31-April 1, 2009; April 15, 2009; April
22, 2009; May 13, 2009; May 20, 2009; June 17, 2009; January 21-22,
2010; March 3, 2010; August 16-17, 2010; and October 25-26, 2010;
December 17, 2010; January 11, 2011; March 3-4, 2011; May 16-17, 2011;
August 18, 2011; August 25, 2011; August 31, 2011. On September 1,
2011, the task force notified working group members that it had made
significant progress in completing its task and requested that the
working group participate in clarifying a limited number of remaining
operational issues relevant to the task that merited review by industry
management, labor, and other stakeholders. No further meetings of the
Physicians Task Force are currently scheduled. Contact: Dr. Bernard
Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Critical Incident Task Force. The Medical Standards Working Group
accepted RSAC Task 2009-02, Critical Incident Response, during the
December 8-9, 2010, meeting. The working group has been tasked to
provide advice regarding development of implementing regulations for
critical incident stress plans as required by the RSIA. A Critical
Incident Task Force was established during the May 24-26, 2010, Medical
Standards Working Group meeting. The scheduled kickoff meeting for the
Critical Incident Task Force scheduled for September 2, 2010, was
postponed at the request of industry participants. In late March 2011,
FRA leadership decided to request that the RSAC be asked to amend the
Critical Incident task statement to remove reference to the Medical
Standards Working Group and to allow the group to assume full working
group status to expedite the work. The Committee approved the revised
task statement with a target date for recommendations to the Committee
of December 2011, and the task force transitioned to the Critical
Incident Working Group. (See Critical Incident Working Group entry.)
Contact: Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Task 08-03--Track Safety Standards Rail Integrity. This task was
accepted on September 10, 2008, to consider specific improvements to
the Track Safety Standards or other responsive actions designed to
enhance rail integrity. The Rail Integrity Task Force was created in
October 2007 under Task 07-01 and
[[Page 58613]]
first met on November 28-29, 2007. The task force met on February 12-
13, 2008; April 15-16, 2008; July 8-9, 2008; September 16-17, 2008;
February 3-4, 2009; June 16-17, 2009; October 29-30, 2009; January 20-
21, 2010; March 9-11, 2010; and April 20, 2010. Consensus has been
achieved on bond wires and a common understanding on internal rail flaw
inspections has been reached. The task force has reached consensus to
recommend to the working group that the item regarding ``the effect of
rail head wear, surface conditions and other relevant factors on the
acquisition and interpretation of internal rail flaw test results'' be
closed. The task force does not recommend regulatory action concerning
head wear. Surface conditions and their affect on test integrity has
been discussed and understood during dialogue concerning common
understanding on internal rail flaw inspections. The task force
believes that new technology has been developed that improves test
performance and will impact the affect of head wear and surface
conditions on interpretation of internal rail flaw test results.
Consensus text was developed on recommended changes that would approach
a performance-based approach to flaw detection scheduling. However, the
group did not reach consensus on what length of segment of track is
practical to use on determining test cycles. Consensus text has been
finalized for recommended changes to 49 CFR 213.113, Defective rails;
213.237, Rail inspection; and 213.241, Inspection records. The task
force has developed a new 49 CFR 213.238, Qualified operator language,
that defines the minimum requirements for the training of a rail flaw
detector car operator. The task force presented the consensus language
to the Track Standards Working Group during the July 28-30, 2010,
meeting and the Track Standards Working Group presented its consensus
recommendations to the RSAC for approval during the September 23, 2010,
Committee meeting. By majority vote, the RSAC accepted the
recommendations of the Track Standards Working Group and forwarded
those recommendations to the Administrator, completing RSAC Task 08-03.
The associated NPRM is currently in the final stages of development
with anticipated target publication date of September 2012. RSAC Task
08-03 will be complete once the final rule is issued. Contact: Carlo
Patrick, (202) 493-6399.
Task No. 09-02--Critical Incident Programs. This task was accepted
on September 10, 2009, to provide advice regarding development of
implementing regulations for Critical Incident Stress Plans as required
by the RSIA. The group has been tasked to define what a ``critical
incident'' is that requires a response; review available data,
literature, and standards of practice concerning critical incident
programs to determine appropriate action when a railroad employee is
involved in or directly witnesses a critical incident; review any
evaluation studies available for existing railroad critical incident
programs; describe program elements appropriate for the rail
environment, including those requirements set forth in the RSIA;
provide an example of a suitable plan (template); and assist in the
preparation of an NPRM no later than December 2010. In late March 2011,
FRA leadership requested that the RSAC amend the Critical Incident task
statement to remove reference to the Medical Standards Working Group
and to allow the group to assume full working group status to expedite
the work. The Committee approved the revised task statement with a
target date for recommendations to the Committee of December 2011. The
Critical Incident Working Group kickoff meeting was held on June 24,
2011. The draft report assessing current knowledge of post-traumatic
interventions and to advance evidence-based recommendations for
controlling the risks associated with traumatic exposure in the
railroad setting was completed and distributed to the working group
prior to the September 8-9, 2011, working group meeting. Due to the
aggressive timeline, the working group held its second meeting on
October 11-12, 2011, and held a follow-on meeting December 13, 2011.
The grantee provided a report titled ``Proposed Key Elements of
Critical Incident Intervention Program for Reducing the Effects of
Potentially Traumatic Exposure on Train Crews to Grade Crossing and
Trespasser Incidents'' to the Critical Incident Working Group on
December 13, 2011. The Critical Incident Working Group approved draft
proposed rule text by electronic vote on August 20, 2012, and will
present its recommendations to the RSAC Committee for vote during the
September 27, 2012, meeting. Contact: Ron Hynes, (202) 493-6404.
Task No. 10-01--Minimum Training Standards and Plans. This task was
accepted on March 18, 2010, to establish minimum training standards for
each class and craft of safety-related railroad employees and their
railroad contractor and subcontractor equivalents, as required by the
RSIA. The group has been tasked to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate, while ensuring that generally
accepted principles of adult learning are employed in training,
development, and delivery; determine a reasonable method for submission
and FRA review of training plans, which takes human resource
limitations into account; establish reasonable oversight criteria to
ensure training plans are effective, using the operational tests and
inspections requirements of 49 CFR part 217 as a model. The Training
Standards Working Group was officially formed through the formal
Committee member nomination process in March 2010, and the first
meeting was held on April 13-14, 2010. A followup working group meeting
was held on June 2-3, 2010, and additional followup meetings were held
August 17-18, 2010, and September 21-22, 2010. A Task Analysis Task
Force was formed under the working group to develop a task analysis
template and met in Florence, KY, on June 22-23, 2010, with CSX
Transportation hosting the event. The group developed a 21-page task
analysis document for an outbound train yard carman position, which is
complete regarding FRA railroad safety laws, regulations, and orders.
The working group met August 17-18, 2010, and October 19-20, 2010, and
by GoTo/Webinar on November 15-16, 2010. The working group reached
consensus and the resulting training standards draft regulatory
language was presented to and approved by the RSAC Committee on
December 14, 2010. This rulemaking will (1) Establish minimum training
standards for each class or craft of safety-related employee and
equivalent railroad contractor and subcontractor employee that require
railroads, contractors, and subcontractors to qualify or otherwise
document the proficiency of such employees in each such class and craft
regarding their knowledge and ability to comply with Federal railroad
safety laws and regulations and railroad rules and procedures intended
to implement those laws and regulations; (2) require submission of
railroads, contractors, and subcontractors'' training and qualification
programs for FRA approval; and (3) establish a minimum training
curriculum and ongoing training criteria, testing, and skills
evaluation measures for track and equipment inspectors employed by
railroads and railroad contractor and subcontractors. The resulting
NPRM was published February 7, 2012 (77 FR 6411), with comments on the
proposed rule due by April 9, 2012. The target publication date for the
final rule is March 2013 and this rulemaking is
[[Page 58614]]
categorized as a modal priority. No additional working group meetings
are scheduled at this time. Contact: Rob Castiglione, (817) 447-2715.
Task No. 10-02--Safety Technology in Dark Territory. This task was
accepted on September 23, 2010, to provide advice regarding development
of standards, guidance, regulations, or orders governing the
development, use, and implementation of rail safety technology in dark
territory, as required by Section 406 of the RSIA. Specifically, the
task was to assist FRA in developing regulations responsive to the
legislative mandate and to report recommendations to the FRA
Administrator for a proposed or interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with OST and OMB) by September 30, 2011. This
rulemaking would issue standards or guidance governing development and
deployment of technology to promote safe operation in non-signaled
territory in arrangements not defined in signal inspection law. The
delay in starting this effort was caused by the PTC rulemaking, which
required the same key personnel both in government and industry. With
the PTC effort maturing, resources became available and the Dark
Territory Working Group was formed to assist FRA in developing
regulations responsive to the legislative mandate and to report
recommendations to the FRA Administrator for proposed or interim final
rule (as determined by FRA in consultation with OST and OMB). The
working group met on March 3-4, 2011, May 9-10, 2011, and September 6-
7, 2011, and created four task forces to investigate specific subject
areas. A follow-on meeting was held November 17-18, 2011, and a
proposed rule is currently under development with the assistance of the
Dark Territory Working Group. Target date for NPRM publication is
November 2012. Contact: Olga Cataldi, (202) 493-6321.
Task No. 11-01--Preventing Railroad Employee Distractions Caused by
Personal Electronic Devices. This task was accepted on May 20, 2011, to
prescribe mitigation strategies, programs, and processes for governing
the use of personal electronic devices that could cause distractions to
railroad employees engaged in safety-critical activities. This working
group will explore additional methods to achieve compliance through
education, peer-to-peer coaching, counseling, and other cooperative,
non-regulatory/punitive methods. The Electronic Device Distraction
Working Group was formed and held its kickoff meeting on October 25-26,
2011, and held follow-on meetings on January 11-12, 2012, and March 27,
2012. Work on this task has progressed well and the working group
presented its recommendations to the Committee during the April 2012
RSAC meeting. As a result of the working group's efforts, FRA is
producing an outreach video, and FRA will participate in an inclusive
media event with its partners in Chicago, IL, on October 9, 2012.
Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Task No. 11-03--Fatigue Management Plans. This task was accepted by
the Committee on December 8, 2011, to provide advice regarding
development of implementing regulations for Fatigue Management Plans
and their deployment under the RSIA. The working group was formed and
held its kickoff meeting on March 27, 2012. Follow-on meetings were
held June 12, 2012; July 10-11, 2012; and August 28, 2012. Work
continues on this task and the working group is tasked to report
recommendations to the Committee no later than February 2013. Contact:
Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Task No. 11-04--Risk Reduction Program. This task was accepted by
the Committee on December 8, 2011, in order to develop requirements for
certain railroads to develop a Risk Reduction Program as mandated by
the RSIA. The working group was formed and held its kickoff meeting on
January 31-February 1, 2012, and follow-on meetings were held April 10-
11, 2012; May 16-17, 2012; June 13, 2012; June 25, 2012; and July 18,
2012. The working group has made considerable progress, and no further
working group meetings are currently scheduled. Contact: Miriam
Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Completed Tasks
Task 96-1--(Completed) Revising the freight power brake
regulations.
Task 96-2--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to the
Track Safety Standards (49 CFR part 213).
Task 96-3--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to the
Radio Standards and Procedures (49 CFR part 220).
Task 96-5--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to
Steam Locomotive Inspection Standards (49 CFR part 230).
Task 96-6--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to
miscellaneous aspects of the regulations addressing locomotive engineer
certification (49 CFR part 240).
Task 96-7--(Completed) Developing roadway maintenance machines (on-
track equipment) safety standards.
Task 96-8--(Completed) Evaluating the need for action responsive to
recommendations contained in a report to Congress titled, Locomotive
Crashworthiness & Working Conditions.
Task 97-1--(Completed) Developing crashworthiness specifications
(49 CFR part 229) to promote the integrity of the locomotive cabs in
accidents resulting from collisions.
Task 97-2--(Completed) Evaluating the extent to which
environmental, sanitary, and other working conditions in locomotive
cabs affect the crew's health and the safe operation of locomotives,
proposing standards where appropriate.
Task 97-3--(Completed) Developing event recorder data survivability
standards.
Task 97-4 and Task 97-5--(Completed) Defining PTC functionalities,
describing available technologies, evaluating costs and benefits of
potential systems, and considering implementation opportunities and
challenges, including demonstration and deployment.
Task 97-6--(Completed) Revising various regulations to address the
safety implications of processor-based signal and train control
technologies, including communications-based operating systems.
Task 97-7--(Completed) Determining damages qualifying an event as a
reportable train accident.
Task 00-01--(Completed task withdrawn) Determining the need to
amend regulations protecting persons who work on, under, or between
rolling equipment and persons applying, removing, or inspecting rear
end marking devices (Blue Signal Protection).
Task 01-01--(Completed) Developing conformity of FRA's regulations
for accident/incident reporting (49 CFR part 225) to revised
regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, and to make appropriate revisions to the FRA Guide
for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports (Reporting Guide).
Task 03-01--Mechanical Task Force--(Completed) Developing
recommendations on mechanical issues (revisions to 49 CFR part 238).
Task 03-01--Crashworthiness Task Force--(Completed) Providing
consensus recommendations on static-end strength.
Task 06-02--(Completed) Issuing requirements for inspection of
joint bars in continuous welded rail (CWR) to detect cracks that could
affect the integrity of the track structure.
[[Page 58615]]
Task 07-01--(Completed) Considering specific improvements to the
Track Safety Standards or other responsive actions, supplementing work
already underway on CWR specific to: reviewing controls applied to the
reuse of rail in CWR ``plug rail''; reviewing the issue of cracks
emanating from bond wire attachments; considering improvements in the
Track Safety Standards related to fastening of rail to concrete ties;
and ensuring a common understanding within the regulated community
concerning requirements for internal rail flaw inspections.
Task 08-01--(Completed) Reporting on the Nation's railroad bridges.
Reporting to FRA on the current state of railroad bridge safety
management; updating the findings and conclusions of the 1993 Summary
Report of the FRA Railroad Bridge Safety Survey.
Task No. 08-04--(Completed) Providing advice regarding development
of implementing regulations for PTC systems and their deployment under
the RSIA.
Task No. 08-05--(Completed) Developing a rule encompassing the
requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA (Railroad Bridge Safety
Assurance).
Task No. 08-06--(Completed) Developing revised recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for hours of service of railroad employees.
Task No. 08-07--(Completed) Developing regulations for
certification of railroad conductors, as required by the RSIA, and
considering any appropriate related amendments to existing regulations
and reporting recommendations for a proposed or interim final rule.
Task No. 09-01--(Completed) Providing advice regarding development
of implementing regulations for the hours of service of operating
employees of commuter and intercity passenger railroads under the RSIA.
Task No. 11-02--(Completed) Considering specific improvements to
the Track Safety Standards or other responsive actions related to the
Track Inspection Time Study required by Sections 403 (a)-(c) of the of
the RSIA and other relevant studies and resources.
Please refer to the notice published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 1996 (61 FR 9740), for more information about the RSAC.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 17, 2012.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-23305 Filed 9-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P