Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 58336-58338 [2012-23147]
Download as PDF
58336
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules
23, 2011. All corrective actions must be done
before further flight.
Federal Aviation Administration
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(i) Related Information
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: (425) 917–6418; fax: (425) 917–
6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; email me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 7, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–23148 Filed 9–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Sep 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0939; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–200–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–202, –203, –223,
–243, –302, –323, –342, and –343
airplanes; and Model A340–313
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports that a specific
batch of cargo doors might have
deviations in quality related to door
structure, such as irregular bore holes,
improper application of sealant and
paint, or uncleanliness. This proposed
AD would require inspecting to identify
the part and serial numbers of the
forward and aft cargo doors, and
replacing the affected cargo doors. We
are proposing this AD to prevent the
degraded structural capability of the
cargo door, a primary structure, from
leading to failure of the door, which
could lead to a breach through the door
or the door detaching from the airplane,
resulting in potential rapid
decompression.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–0939; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–200–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0177,
dated September 15, 2011 (corrected
September 28, 2011) (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Investigations have shown that a specific
batch of cargo doors might have deviations in
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules
quality, such as irregular bore holes,
improper application of sealant and paint or
cleanliness. These production deviations are
related to the quality of the door structure.
This condition, if not corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the affected
Forward (Fwd) and Aft cargo doors.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires a one-time inspection to
identify the [part and serial numbers of the]
Fwd and Aft cargo doors, and replacement of
the affected cargo doors.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is the degraded
structural capability of the cargo door, a
primary structure, which could lead to
failure of the door, which could detach
from the airplane or have a breach
through the door, resulting in potential
decompression. Required actions
include contacting the FAA, or EASA
(or its delegated agent), for repair
instructions for any door part/serial
number that cannot be identified for a
specified airplane. You may obtain
further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletins A330–52–3083 (for affected
Model A330 airplanes) and A340–52–
4093 (for Model A340–313 airplanes),
both dated May 31, 2011. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 6 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$1,020, or $170 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 52 work-hours and require parts
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Sep 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
costing $0, for a cost of $4,420 per
product; the manufacturer has agreed to
reimburse these labor costs. Where the
service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty,
we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. We have no
way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58337
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2012–0939;
Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–200–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November
5, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Model A330–202, –203, –223, –243,
–302, –323, –342, and –343 airplanes,
manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 0796,
0832, 0840, 0845, 0849, 0853, 0855, 0861,
0862, 0866, 0868, 0871, 0873, 0876, 0879,
0882, 0885, 0887, 0889, 0891, 0892, 0896,
0898, 0899, 0903, 0904, 0905, 0907, 0913,
0927, 0930, 0935, 0936, 0937, 0940, 0943,
0944, 0946, 0949, 0952, 0954, 0964, 0971,
0975, 0982 through 0986 inclusive, 0988,
0989, 0990, 0992, 0994, 0995, 0997, 0998,
0999, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1006, 1007, 1009
through 1016 inclusive, 1018, 1020, 1022,
1023, 1026, 1028, 1029, 1037, 1045, 1049,
1052, 1053, 1055, 1058, 1060, 1061, 1065
through 1067 inclusive, 1071 through 1075
inclusive, 1077, 1080, and 1082.
(2) Model A340–313 airplane, MSN 0955.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 52: Doors.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports that a
specific batch of cargo doors might have
deviations in quality related to door
structure, such as irregular bore holes,
improper application of sealant and paint, or
uncleanliness. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the degraded structural capability of
the cargo door, a primary structure, from
leading to failure of the door, which could
detach from the airplane or have a breach
through the door, resulting in potential rapid
decompression.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
58338
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Inspection
At the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD:
Inspect to identify the part number and serial
number of the airplane’s forward and aft
cargo doors, as applicable to MSN, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–52–3083, dated May 31, 2011
(for Model A330 airplanes); or Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–52–4093,
dated May 31, 2011 (for Model A340
airplanes). A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the part number and serial
number of the door can be conclusively
determined from that review.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 7,400 total
flight cycles, or 72 months after the airplane’s
first flight, whichever occurs first.
(2) Within 60 days after the effective date
of this AD.
(h) Replacement
If, during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, the part number and
serial number of the airplane’s forward and/
or aft cargo doors, as applicable to airplane
MSN, are identified in Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330–52–3083, dated May
31, 2011 (for Model A330 airplanes); or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–52–
4093, dated May 31, 2011 (for Model A340
airplanes): Before further flight, replace the
affected door with a new or serviceable door,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–52–3083, dated May 31, 2011;
or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–
52–4093, dated May 31, 2011; as applicable.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Repair
If, during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, there is any
discrepancy between the installed forward
and/or aft cargo doors part/serial number and
the airplane MSN, as that part/serial number
and MSN are identified in Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330–52–3083, dated May
31, 2011 (for Model A330 airplanes); or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–52–
4093, dated May 31, 2011 (for Model A340
airplanes): Within 10 days after
accomplishing the inspection, contact the
FAA, or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent), for
further instructions and time limits, and
accomplish those instructions within the
specified time limits.
(j) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install on any airplane a forward
or aft cargo door that was removed from any
airplane as required by paragraph (h) of this
AD.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Sep 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(l) Related Information
Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0177, dated September 15,
2011 (corrected September 28, 2011), and the
service information identified in paragraphs
(l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD, for related
information.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–52–3083, dated May 31, 2011.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–52–4093, dated May 31, 2011.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 6, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–23147 Filed 9–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 423
Trade Regulation Rule on Care
Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel
and Certain Piece Goods
Federal Trade Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Based on comments received
in response to its Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (‘‘ANPR’’), the
Federal Trade Commission proposes to
amend its trade regulation rule on Care
Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel
and Certain Piece Goods as Amended
(‘‘Rule’’) to: Allow garment
manufacturers and marketers to include
instructions for professional
wetcleaning on labels; permit the use of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ASTM Standard D5489–07, ‘‘Standard
Guide for Care Symbols for Care
Instructions on Textile Products,’’ or
ISO 3758:2005(E), ‘‘Textiles—Care
labelling code using symbols,’’ in lieu of
terms; clarify what can constitute a
reasonable basis for care instructions;
and update the definition of ‘‘dryclean.’’
In addition, the Commission seeks
comment on several other issues.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 16,
2012. Parties interested in an
opportunity to present views orally
should submit a request to do so as
explained below, and such requests
must be received on or before November
16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Care Labeling Rule, 16
CFR Part 423, Project No. R511915’’ on
your comment, and file your comment
online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
carelabelingnprm by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex B), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert M. Frisby, Attorney, Federal
Trade Commission, Division of
Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–
2098.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission finds that using expedited
procedures in this rulemaking will serve
the public interest. Specifically, they
support the Commission’s goals of
clarifying and updating existing
regulations without undue expenditure
of resources, while ensuring that the
public has an opportunity to submit
data, views, and arguments on whether
the Commission should amend the Rule.
Because written comments should
adequately present the views of all
interested parties, the Commission is
not scheduling a public hearing or
workshop. However, if any person
would like to present views orally, he or
she should follow the procedures set
forth in the DATES, ADDRESSES, and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION sections of
this document. Pursuant to 16 CFR 1.20,
the Commission will use the procedures
set forth in this document, including: (1)
Publishing this Notice of Proposed
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58336-58338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23147]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0939; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-200-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A330-202, -203, -223, -243, -302, -323, -342, and
-343 airplanes; and Model A340-313 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports that a specific batch of cargo doors might have
deviations in quality related to door structure, such as irregular bore
holes, improper application of sealant and paint, or uncleanliness.
This proposed AD would require inspecting to identify the part and
serial numbers of the forward and aft cargo doors, and replacing the
affected cargo doors. We are proposing this AD to prevent the degraded
structural capability of the cargo door, a primary structure, from
leading to failure of the door, which could lead to a breach through
the door or the door detaching from the airplane, resulting in
potential rapid decompression.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 5,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0939;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-200-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0177, dated September 15, 2011 (corrected
September 28, 2011) (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Investigations have shown that a specific batch of cargo doors
might have deviations in
[[Page 58337]]
quality, such as irregular bore holes, improper application of
sealant and paint or cleanliness. These production deviations are
related to the quality of the door structure.
This condition, if not corrected, may degrade the structural
integrity of the affected Forward (Fwd) and Aft cargo doors.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time inspection to identify the [part and serial numbers of the] Fwd
and Aft cargo doors, and replacement of the affected cargo doors.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is the degraded structural capability of the cargo
door, a primary structure, which could lead to failure of the door,
which could detach from the airplane or have a breach through the door,
resulting in potential decompression. Required actions include
contacting the FAA, or EASA (or its delegated agent), for repair
instructions for any door part/serial number that cannot be identified
for a specified airplane. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletins A330-52-3083 (for
affected Model A330 airplanes) and A340-52-4093 (for Model A340-313
airplanes), both dated May 31, 2011. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 6 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $1,020, or $170 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 52 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$4,420 per product; the manufacturer has agreed to reimburse these
labor costs. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. We have no way of determining the number of products that may
need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2012-0939; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-
200-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November 5, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Model A330-202, -203, -223, -243, -302, -323, -342, and -343
airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 0796, 0832, 0840, 0845,
0849, 0853, 0855, 0861, 0862, 0866, 0868, 0871, 0873, 0876, 0879,
0882, 0885, 0887, 0889, 0891, 0892, 0896, 0898, 0899, 0903, 0904,
0905, 0907, 0913, 0927, 0930, 0935, 0936, 0937, 0940, 0943, 0944,
0946, 0949, 0952, 0954, 0964, 0971, 0975, 0982 through 0986
inclusive, 0988, 0989, 0990, 0992, 0994, 0995, 0997, 0998, 0999,
1001, 1002, 1003, 1006, 1007, 1009 through 1016 inclusive, 1018,
1020, 1022, 1023, 1026, 1028, 1029, 1037, 1045, 1049, 1052, 1053,
1055, 1058, 1060, 1061, 1065 through 1067 inclusive, 1071 through
1075 inclusive, 1077, 1080, and 1082.
(2) Model A340-313 airplane, MSN 0955.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52: Doors.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports that a specific batch of cargo
doors might have deviations in quality related to door structure,
such as irregular bore holes, improper application of sealant and
paint, or uncleanliness. We are issuing this AD to prevent the
degraded structural capability of the cargo door, a primary
structure, from leading to failure of the door, which could detach
from the airplane or have a breach through the door, resulting in
potential rapid decompression.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the
[[Page 58338]]
compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been
done.
(g) Inspection
At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(2) of this AD: Inspect to identify the part number and serial
number of the airplane's forward and aft cargo doors, as applicable
to MSN, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-52-3083, dated May 31, 2011 (for
Model A330 airplanes); or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-52-
4093, dated May 31, 2011 (for Model A340 airplanes). A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the part number and serial number of the door can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 7,400 total flight cycles, or
72 months after the airplane's first flight, whichever occurs first.
(2) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD.
(h) Replacement
If, during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
the part number and serial number of the airplane's forward and/or
aft cargo doors, as applicable to airplane MSN, are identified in
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-52-3083, dated May 31, 2011
(for Model A330 airplanes); or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340-52-4093, dated May 31, 2011 (for Model A340 airplanes): Before
further flight, replace the affected door with a new or serviceable
door, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-52-3083, dated May 31, 2011; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-52-4093, dated May 31, 2011;
as applicable.
(i) Repair
If, during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
there is any discrepancy between the installed forward and/or aft
cargo doors part/serial number and the airplane MSN, as that part/
serial number and MSN are identified in Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330-52-3083, dated May 31, 2011 (for Model A330
airplanes); or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-52-4093, dated
May 31, 2011 (for Model A340 airplanes): Within 10 days after
accomplishing the inspection, contact the FAA, or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent), for further
instructions and time limits, and accomplish those instructions
within the specified time limits.
(j) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install on
any airplane a forward or aft cargo door that was removed from any
airplane as required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(l) Related Information
Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0177, dated
September 15, 2011 (corrected September 28, 2011), and the service
information identified in paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD,
for related information.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-52-3083, dated May
31, 2011.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-52-4093, dated May
31, 2011.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 6, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-23147 Filed 9-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P