Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision Approval, State of Mississippi, 58131-58132 [2012-23089]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 19, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
are conducted in accordance with 40
CFR part 22.
CAA
NCW also violated regulations
promulgated pursuant to the California
SIP involving the two facilities
described in the paragraphs below at
varying lengths of time between 2001
and 2007. Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA,
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), requires states to
submit implementation plans to
implement, maintain, and enforce
ambient air quality standards. Section
110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
7410(a)(2), requires states to include in
their implementation plans regulation of
the modification and construction of
any stationary source covered by the
plan. The California State
Implementation Plan (SIP) includes
requirements from local governments.
The California SIP, including the
requirements specific to the local
governments, was approved by EPA
under section 110 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
7410.
The California air quality control
districts’ rules for the jurisdictions set
forth below include regulations that
require construction and/or operating
permits for certain stationary sources of
air pollution. As detailed below, each of
these provisions was incorporated into
the California SIP and is therefore
federally enforceable.
In the State of California, NCW
operates diesel fuel-powered electric
generators that are stationary sources
within the meaning of CAA section
302(z), 42 U.S.C. 7602(z).
A. Bay Area Air Quality Management
District (BAAQMD)—The California SIP
includes a provision, Regulation 2, Rule
1 BAAQMD Rules, stating that any
person installing any equipment, the
use of which may cause the issuance of
air contaminants, must first obtain
authorization for such construction and
subsequent operation. This provision
was federally approved and became
federally enforceable on January 26,
1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 3850). NCW owns or
operates a facility (2 miles off Lynch
Road, Suisun, CA) in the BAAQMD that
installed a pollution-emitting dieselpowered electric generating unit
without written authorization from
BAAQMD in violation of Regulation 2,
Rule 1.
B. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
Pollution Control District
(SJVUAPCD)—The California SIP
includes a provision, section 3.0 in
SJVUAPCD Rule 2010, stating that any
person installing any equipment, the
use of which may cause the issuance of
air contaminants, must first obtain
authorization for such construction and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Sep 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
subsequent operation. This provision
was federally approved and became
federally enforceable on July 23, 1999
(64 Fed. Reg. 39,920). NCW owns or
operates a facility (6855 West Eight Mile
Road, Stockton, CA) in the SJVUAPCD
that installed two pollution-emitting
diesel-powered electric generating units
without written authorization from
SJVUAPCD in violation of Rule 2010.
NCW violated regulations
promulgated pursuant to the California
SIP involving the two facilities
described in the paragraphs above and
is therefore subject to federal
enforcement under CAA section 110(a).
EPA, as authorized by CAA section
113(d), 42 U.S.C. 7413(d), has assessed
a civil penalty for these violations.
Under CAA section 113(d), 42 U.S.C.
7413(d), the Administrator may issue an
administrative order assessing a civil
penalty against any person who has
violated an applicable requirement of
the CAA, including any rule, order,
waiver, permit or plan. Proceedings
under CAA section 113(d) are
conducted in accordance with 40 CFR
Part 22.
EPA will not issue an order in this
proceeding prior to the close of the
public comment period.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection.
Dated: September 10, 2012.
Bernadette Rappold,
Director, Special Litigation and Projects
Division, Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance.
[FR Doc. 2012–23090 Filed 9–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9730–1]
Cross-Media Electronic Reporting:
Authorized Program Revision
Approval, State of Mississippi
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces EPA’s
approval of the State of Mississippi’s
request to revise/modify certain of its
EPA-authorized programs to allow
electronic reporting.
DATES: EPA’s approval is effective on
September 19, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evi
Huffer, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58131
DC 20460, (202) 566–1697,
huffer.evi@epa.gov, or Karen Seeh, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information,
Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460,
(202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR)
was published in the Federal Register
(70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of
title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR
establishes electronic reporting as an
acceptable regulatory alternative to
paper reporting and establishes
requirements to assure that electronic
documents are as legally dependable as
their paper counterparts. Subpart D of
CROMERR requires that state, tribal or
local government agencies that receive,
or wish to begin receiving, electronic
reports under their EPA-authorized
programs must apply to EPA for a
revision or modification of those
programs and obtain EPA approval.
Subpart D provides standards for such
approvals based on consideration of the
electronic document receiving systems
that the state, tribal, or local government
will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b)
through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D
provides special procedures for program
revisions and modifications to allow
electronic reporting, to be used at the
option of the State, Tribe or local
government in place of procedures
available under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart
D procedures must show that the state,
tribe or local government has sufficient
legal authority to implement the
electronic reporting components of the
programs covered by the application
and will use electronic document
receiving systems that meet the
applicable subpart D requirements.
On January 14, 2010, the Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) submitted an application
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Services Portal/
Hazardous Waste Biennial Reporting’’
for revisions/modifications of its EPAauthorized programs under title 40 CFR.
EPA reviewed MDEQ’s request to
revise/modify its EPA-authorized
programs and, based on this review,
EPA determined that the application
met the standards for approval of
authorized program revisions/
modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR
3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision
to approve Mississippi’s request to
revise/modify its following EPAauthorized programs to allow electronic
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
58132
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 19, 2012 / Notices
reporting under 40 CFR parts 51, 61, 70,
261–262, and 264–265 is being
published in the Federal Register:
Part 52—Requirements for
Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans;
Part 61—National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
Subpart M—National Emission
Standard for Asbestos;
Part 70—State Operating Permit
Programs; and
Part 272—Approved State Hazardous
Waste Management Programs.
Specifically, EPA has approved the
state’s revision to its part 272 authorized
program for electronic reporting of
hazardous waste biennial report
information under 40 CFR parts 262.41
and 264.75, for electronic submissions
that include a handwritten signature on
a separate paper submission report
instead of an electronic signature.
MDEQ was notified of EPA’s
determination to approve its application
with respect to the authorized programs
listed above.
Dated: September 10, 2012.
Andrew Battin,
Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2012–23089 Filed 9–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9729–8]
Public Water System Supervision
Program Revision for the State of Utah
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
provisions of Section 1413 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42 U.S.C.
300g–2, public notice is hereby given
that the state of Utah has revised its
Public Water System Supervision
(PWSS) Program by adopting
regulations for the Lead and Copper
Short Term Revisions, Long Term 1
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment
Rule, the Long Term 2 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule and the
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule that correspond to the
National Primary Drinking Water
Regulations (NPDWR). The EPA has
completed its review of these revisions
in accordance with the SDWA and
proposes to approve them.
Today’s approval action does not
extend to public water systems in
Indian country as defined in 18 U.S.C.
1151. Please see Supplementary
Information, Item B.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Sep 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Any member of the public is
invited to submit written comments
and/or request a public hearing on this
determination by October 19, 2012.
Please see Supplementary Information,
Item C, for details. Should no timely
and appropriate request for a hearing be
received, and the Regional
Administrator (RA) does not elect to
hold a hearing on his own motion, this
determination shall become effective
October 19, 2012. If a public hearing is
requested and granted, then this
determination shall not become
effective until such time following the
hearing as the RA issues an order
affirming or rescinding this action.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
requests for a public hearing should be
addressed to: James B. Martin, Regional
Administrator, c/o Robert Clement,
Drinking Water Unit (8P–W–DW), U.S.
EPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, CO 80202–1129.
All documents relating to this
determination are available for
inspection at the following locations: (1)
U.S. EPA, Region 8, Drinking Water
Unit (7th floor), 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, CO 80202–1129; (2) Utah
Department of Environmental Quality,
Division of Drinking Water, (3rd floor),
195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT
84116.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Clement, Drinking Water Unit
(8P–W–DW), U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202–
1129, (303) 312–6653.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA
approved Utah’s application for
assuming primary enforcement
authority for the PWSS program,
pursuant to Section 1413 of the SDWA,
42 U.S.C. 300g–2, and 40 CFR part 142.
The Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Drinking Water
administers Utah’s PWSS program.
DATES:
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States with primary PWSS
enforcement authority must comply
with the requirements of 40 CFR part
142 for maintaining primacy. They must
adopt regulations that are at least as
stringent as the NPDWRs at 40 CFR
parts 141 and 142, as well as adopt all
new and revised NPDWRs in order to
retain primacy (40 CFR 142.12(a)).
limited to, land within the formal
Indian Reservations located within or
abutting the state of Utah, including the
Skull Valley, Paiute, Navajo, Goshute,
Ute Mountain, and Northwestern
Shoshoni Indian Reservations; Indian
country lands within the Uintah and
Ouray Indian Reservation; any land held
in trust by the United States for an
Indian tribe, and any other areas which
are ‘‘Indian country’’ within the
meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
C. Requesting a Hearing
Any request for a public hearing shall
include: (1) The name, address, and
telephone number of the individual,
organization, or other entity requesting
a hearing; (2) a brief statement of the
requester’s interest in the RA’s
determination and of information that
he/she intends to submit at such
hearing; and (3) the signature of the
requester or responsible official, if made
on behalf of an organization or other
entity.
Notice of any hearing shall be given
not less than fifteen (15) days prior to
the time scheduled for the hearing and
will be made by the RA in the Federal
Register and in a newspaper of general
circulation in the state. A notice will
also be sent to both the person(s)
requesting the hearing and the state. The
hearing notice will include a statement
of purpose, information regarding time
and location, and the address and
telephone number where interested
persons may obtain further information.
The RA will issue a final determination
upon review of the hearing record.
Frivolous or insubstantial requests for
a hearing may be denied by the RA.
However, if a substantial request is
made within thirty (30) days after this
notice, a public hearing will be held.
Please bring this notice to the
attention of any persons known by you
to have an interest in this
determination.
Dated: August 27, 2012.
Howard M. Cantor,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2012–23093 Filed 9–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9729–7]
B. How does today’s action affect
Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Utah?
Public Water System Supervision
Program Revision for the State of
Colorado
Utah is not authorized to carry out its
PWSS program in Indian country, as
that term is defined at 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Indian country includes, but is not
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58131-58132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23089]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9730-1]
Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, State of Mississippi
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of the State of
Mississippi's request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized
programs to allow electronic reporting.
DATES: EPA's approval is effective on September 19, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evi Huffer, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1697, huffer.evi@epa.gov, or Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-1175,
seeh.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribal, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec. 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the State, Tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
On January 14, 2010, the Mississippi Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ) submitted an application entitled ``Regulatory Services
Portal/Hazardous Waste Biennial Reporting'' for revisions/modifications
of its EPA-authorized programs under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed MDEQ's
request to revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this
review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for
approval of authorized program revisions/modifications set out in 40
CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice
of EPA's decision to approve Mississippi's request to revise/modify its
following EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic
[[Page 58132]]
reporting under 40 CFR parts 51, 61, 70, 261-262, and 264-265 is being
published in the Federal Register:
Part 52--Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans;
Part 61--National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
Subpart M--National Emission Standard for Asbestos;
Part 70--State Operating Permit Programs; and
Part 272--Approved State Hazardous Waste Management Programs.
Specifically, EPA has approved the state's revision to its part 272
authorized program for electronic reporting of hazardous waste biennial
report information under 40 CFR parts 262.41 and 264.75, for electronic
submissions that include a handwritten signature on a separate paper
submission report instead of an electronic signature.
MDEQ was notified of EPA's determination to approve its application
with respect to the authorized programs listed above.
Dated: September 10, 2012.
Andrew Battin,
Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2012-23089 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P