Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comments Requested: ATF Distribution Center Survey, 57590-57591 [2012-22892]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
57590
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 18, 2012 / Notices
finding of no violation, and terminates
the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on July 14, 2011, based on a complaint
filed by Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
of Austin, Texas (‘‘Freescale’’). 76 FR
41521–2 (July 14, 2011). The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement
of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
5,467,455 (‘‘the ’455 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges the existence
of a domestic industry. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named Funai Electric Co., Ltd. of Osaka,
Japan and Funai Corporation, Inc. of
Rutherford, New Jersey (collectively
‘‘Funai’’); MediaTek Inc. of Hsinchu
City, Taiwan (‘‘MediaTek’’); and Zoran
Corporation of Sunnyvale, California
(‘‘Zoran’’) as respondents. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations was named
as a party. On May 25, 2012, the
Commission determined not to review
an ID (Order No. 27) terminating the
investigation as to Funai on the basis of
a consent order. Notice (May 25, 2012).
On May 29, 2012, the Commission
determined not to review an ID (Order
No. 31) terminating the investigation as
to certain Zoran products and certain
MediaTek products. Notice (May 29,
2012).
On July 12, 2012, the ALJ issued his
final ID, finding no violation of section
337 as to the ’455 patent. The ID
included the ALJ’s recommended
determination (‘‘RD’’) on remedy and
bonding. In particular, the ALJ found
that claims 9 and 10 of the ’455 patent
are not invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Sep 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
102, but that they are invalid pursuant
to 35 U.S.C. 103. The ALJ further found
that those Zoran products that were
adjudicated in Integrated Circuits I are
precluded under the doctrine of issue
preclusion. The ALJ also found that
certain of the accused Zoran products
remaining in the investigation infringe
claims 9 and 10 of the ’455 patent, but
that the accused MediaTek products do
not infringe claims 9 and 10 of the ’455
patent. The ALJ further found that
Freescale has failed to satisfy the
domestic industry requirement with
respect to the ’455 patent. The ALJ’s RD
recommended a limited exclusion order
barring entry of Zoran’s and MediaTek’s
infringing integrated circuits, chipsets,
and products containing same including
televisions. Freescale did not request,
and the ALJ did not recommend,
issuance of a cease and desist order
against Zoran. The ALJ also
recommended that respondents be
required to post no bond for the
importation of products found to
infringe during the period of
Presidential review.
On July 24, 2012, Freescale filed a
petition for review of certain aspects of
the final ID’s findings concerning
infringement, validity, and domestic
industry, and preclusion. Also on July
25, 2012, the IA timely filed a petition
for review of certain aspect of the final
ID’s findings concerning claim
construction. Further on July 24, 2012,
Zoran and MediaTek contingently
petitioned for review of certain aspects
of the final ID’s findings concerning
claim construction, infringement,
domestic industry, and preclusion. No
post-RD statements on the public
interest pursuant to Commission Rule
201.50(a)(4) or in response to the postRD Commission Notice issued on July
16, 2012, were filed. See 77 FR 42764
(July 20, 2012).
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ALJ’s final
ID, the petitions for review, and the
responses thereto, the Commission has
determined to review the final ID in
part. Specifically, the Commission has
determined to review, and on review,
reverses the ALJ’s finding that Japanese
Patent Application JP H05–83113–A to
Kuboki (‘‘Kuboki’’) discloses the
limitation ‘‘[a] data processor within an
integrated circuit package comprising:
* * * a plurality of bus termination
circuits’’ of claim 9 of the ’455 patent.
The Commission has also determined to
review, and on review, affirms with
modification the ID’s finding that
Kuboki in combination with the
knowledge of one of ordinary skill in
the art renders obvious claims 9 and 10
of the ’455 patent. The Commission has
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
further determined to review the ID’s
finding that the Kuboki reference in
combination with U.S. Patent No.
5,479,123 to Gist (‘‘Gist’’) renders
obvious claims 9 and 10, and on review,
finds that the Kuboki reference in
combination with Gist and the
knowledge of one of ordinary skill in
the art renders obvious claims 9 and 10
of the ’455 patent. The Commission has
also determined to review the ID’s
finding that Freescale failed to establish
the existence of a domestic industry
based on its licensing activities, and on
review, affirms the ID’s finding with
modification. The Commission has
further determined to review the ID’s
finding that Freescale has failed to show
that the Accused Zoran Hybrid
Termination Circuits infringe claims 9
and 10 of the ’455 patent and on review,
affirms the ID’s finding with
modification.
The Commission has determined not
to review the remaining issues decided
in the ID. A Commission opinion will
issue shortly.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–46 and 210.50 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46 and
210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 12, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–22943 Filed 9–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0001]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: ATF
Distribution Center Survey
60-Day notice of information
collection under review.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 18, 2012 / Notices
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until November 19, 2012.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact John Sickler, Materiel
Management Branch at
John.Sickler@atf.gov, 1519 Cabin Branch
Drive, Landover, MD 20785.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Summary of Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: ATF
Distribution Center Survey.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: ATF F 1370.4.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract. Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other: Individual or households.
Need for Collection
The information provided on the form
is used to evaluate the ATF Distribution
Center and the services it provides to
the users of ATF forms and
publications.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Sep 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 240
respondents will complete a 1 minute
form.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 4
annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice,
Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street
NE., Room 2E–508, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: September 12, 2012.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–22892 Filed 9–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0008]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Application and
Permit for Permanent Exportation of
Firearms
60-Day notice of information
collection under review.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until November 19, 2012.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Gary Schaible, National
Firearms Act Branch at
gary.schaible@atf.gov.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57591
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Summary of Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Application and Permit for Permanent
Exportation of Firearms.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: ATF F 9
(5320.9). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other: Individual or households.
Need for Collection
The form is used to obtain permission
to export firearms and serves as a
vehicle to allow either the removal of
the firearm from registration in the
National Firearms Registration and
Transfer Record or collection of an
excise tax. It is used by Federal firearms
licensees and others to obtain a benefit.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 930
respondents will complete a 18 minute
form.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 279
annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S.
Department of Justice, Two Constitution
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57590-57591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22892]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140-0001]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: ATF Distribution Center Survey
ACTION: 60-Day notice of information collection under review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will be submitting the following
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published
to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments
[[Page 57591]]
are encouraged and will be accepted for ``sixty days'' until November
19, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with instructions or additional
information, please contact John Sickler, Materiel Management Branch at
John.Sickler@atf.gov, 1519 Cabin Branch Drive, Landover, MD 20785.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following
four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Summary of Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently
approved collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: ATF Distribution Center Survey.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number: ATF F
1370.4. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract. Primary: Business or other for-profit. Other:
Individual or households.
Need for Collection
The information provided on the form is used to evaluate the ATF
Distribution Center and the services it provides to the users of ATF
forms and publications.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated
that 240 respondents will complete a 1 minute form.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: There are an estimated 4 annual total burden hours
associated with this collection.
If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice
Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 2E-508, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: September 12, 2012.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012-22892 Filed 9-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P