Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and Overseas Embassies and Consulates, 57012-57013 [2012-22862]
Download as PDF
57012
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
11, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2012–22802 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 8026]
22 CFR Parts 22 and 42
RIN 1400–AD06
Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates
Bureau of Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rulemaking addresses
public comments regarding an Interim
Final Rule that makes changes to the
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services
(Schedule) for a number of different visa
fees. The Department of State adopts the
rule as final, without change.
DATES: Effective September 17, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Special Assistant, Office of the
Comptroller, Bureau of Consular Affairs,
Department of State; phone: 202–663–
1576, telefax: 202–663–2526; email:
fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For the
complete explanation of the background
of this rule, including the rationale for
the change, the authority of the
Department of State (‘‘Department’’) to
make the fee changes in question, and
an explanation of the study that
produced the fee amounts, consult the
prior public notices: 77 FR 18907
(March 29, 2012); 77 FR 20294 (April 4,
2012); and 75 FR 14111 (March 24,
2010).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Background
The Department published an interim
final rule in the Federal Register (77 FR
18907, March 29, 2012) amending 22
CFR parts 22 and 42. Specifically, the
rule made changes to the Schedule of
Fees for Consular Services for visa fees
and provided 60 days for comments
from the public. During the comment
period 18 comments were received,
either by email or through the
submission process at
www.regulations.gov. The Department
analyzed these 18 comments and
reproduces that analysis in the Analysis
of Comments section below.
This rule finalizes the following fees
for the categories below, as determined
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
by the Cost of Service Model (CoSM),
which took effect on April 13, 2012.
• Non-Petition based Nonimmigrant
Visa Application (except E category):
from $140 to $160
• H, L, O, P, Q and R visa categories:
from $150 to $190
• E visa category: from $390 to $270
• K visa category: from $350 to $240
• BCC Adult: from $140 to $160
• BCC Minor: from $14 to $15
• Family-Based Immigrant visa: from
$330 to $230
• Employment-Based Immigrant visa:
from $720 to $405
• Other Immigrant visas (including I–
360 self-petitioners and special
immigrant visas): from $305 to $220
• Diversity Visa Lottery Fee (per person
applying as a result of the lottery
program): from $440 to $330
• Determining Returning Resident
Status: from $380 to $275
• Transportation Letters for Lawful
Permanent Residents of the United
States: from $165 to $0
Analysis of Comments
The interim rule was published for
public comment on March 29, 2012.
During this period, the Department
received 18 comments/questions. The
following analysis addresses these 18
comments.
Four comments were questions
regarding when the fee changes took
effect. To answer: applicants paid the
fee amount that was effective on the
date they paid the fee. Receipts for fees
paid under the prior fee schedule were
accepted for 90 days following the
effective fee change (i.e., July 12, 2012).
In short, if a fee was paid on or before
April 12, 2012 the receipt for the prior
fee was valid until July 12, 2012. If a fee
was paid April 13, 2012 or later, an
applicant paid the new fee.
Four comments criticized the increase
of the nonimmigrant visa application
processing fee, arguing that the increase
would make it more difficult for visitors
to bring their families to the United
States to visit. Although the Department
understands the financial difficulties
that may result from a fee increase, the
Department must recover the cost of
providing those services and sets the
fees for those services accordingly,
including nonimmigrant visa
application processing fees.
Seven comments from H–2 employers
opposed the H visa fee increase from
$150 to $190. Those comments stated
that the fee increase would be an added
tax burden and competitive
disadvantage for U.S. domestic food
producers who compete in a global
marketplace. The comments also stated
that increasing the cost of the H–2 visa
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to fund expanded adjudication capacity
and physical infrastructure
improvements at consulates in China
and Brazil was unfair because very few
H–2 workers come from either of these
countries. In addition, the comments
questioned whether the H–2 fee increase
would lead to any improvements in the
H–2 program, particularly in Mexico
where most employers hire their H–2
workers.
The Department is adjusting the
processing fee for H-category visas from
$150 to $190 because processing an H
visa application requires a review of
extensive documentation and a more indepth interview of the applicant than
for other categories of nonimmigrant
visas. Because the fees are set based on
cost, a more time-consuming process
necessarily will result in a higher fee.
Although some of the comments
expressed the belief that adjudicating H
category visas should require simpler
processing for repeat applicants, the
Cost of Service Model (CoSM) showed
that H visas require more time and
resources to process than others. The
Department determined it would be
fairer to charge a higher fee for those
visa categories requiring more complex
processing (H, L, O, P, Q, R, E, and K),
rather than spreading those additional
costs out across all other visa categories.
In addition, the fees established by this
rule are based on unit costs, which
represent the global average costs for
each service as a whole. The most recent
CoSM, the activity-based costing model
the Department used to determine the
new processing fees, improved
substantially upon prior cost of service
models by identifying unit costs not just
for nonimmigrant visas as a whole, but
for specific visa classes that involved
more work to process. The CoSM did
not, however, distinguish between
subcategories of visas within a single
category, such as an H–1B versus an H–
2. Instead, the cost model averaged
together the cost of processing all
subcategories within a particular
category of visa, which the Department
used to calculate a single processing fee
for that visa category. Although the time
to process individual visa applications
will vary from application to
application, the fee is set based on the
average cost to process a visa
application from that visa category.
The costs for worldwide physical
upgrades and personnel increases,
including in China and Brazil, were
spread out across all nonimmigrant visa
categories in order to keep the impact
minimal. In addition to the upgrades to
the Department’s facilities in China and
Brazil, the Department opened a new
consulate facility in Tijuana in 2010 and
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
plans to open a new facility in
Monterrey in 2014. The Department also
recently opened application service
centers in Mexicali, Piedras Negras, and
Reynosa to accommodate additional
applicants along the U.S.-Mexico
border.
Of the three remaining comments, one
noted its support for the reduced K visa
fee and one applauded the Department
for decreasing consular fees on certain
nonimmigrant, immigrant, and special
visa services, while also expressing
concern for the increases to the other
visa categories. One comment expressed
a desire for a discount on all minor
NIVs, not just minor BCCs. We note that
the Department is required by law to set
the fee for the minor BCC below cost at
$15. The same requirement does not
apply to other minor NIVs, which the
Department sets on the basis of cost as
described more fully above.
Conclusion
The Department has adjusted the fees
to ensure that sufficient resources are
available to meet the costs of providing
consular services in light of the CoSM’s
findings. Pursuant to OMB guidance
and federal law, the Department
endeavors to recover the cost of
providing services that benefit specific
individuals rather than the public at
large. See OMB Circular A–25, sections
6(a)(1), (a)(2)(a); 31 U.S.C. 9701(b). For
this reason, the Department has adjusted
the Schedule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
16:41 Sep 14, 2012
[FR Doc. 2012–22862 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9598]
RIN 1545–BK98
Integrated Hedging Transactions of
Qualifying Debt
Correction
In rule document 2012–21986
appearing on pages 54808–54811 in the
issue of Thursday, September 6, 2012
make the following correction:
On page 54811, in the first column, on
the eleventh line from the bottom of the
page, ‘‘(i) Expiration date. This section
expires on September 4, 2012’’, should
read ‘‘(i) Expiration date. This section
expires on September 4, 2015.’’
[FR Doc. C1–2012–21986 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DoD–2012–OS–0102]
Jkt 226001
Defense Intelligence Agency,
DoD.
Direct final rule with request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Defense Intelligence
Agency is updating the Defense
Intelligence Agency Privacy Act
Program, by adding the (k)(2) exemption
to accurately describe the basis for
exempting the records in the system of
records notice LDIA 10–0002, Foreign
Intelligence and Counterintelligence
Operation Records. This direct final rule
makes non-substantive changes to the
Defense Intelligence Agency Privacy
Program rules. These changes will allow
the Department to exempt records from
certain portions of the Privacy Act. This
will improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of DoD’s program by
ensuring the integrity of ongoing
Foreign Intelligence and
Counterintelligence Operations Records
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Ms.
Theresa Lowery at (202) 231–1193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY:
related to the protection of national
security, DoD personnel, facilities and
equipment of the Defense Intelligence
Agency and the Department of Defense.
This rule is being published as a
direct final rule as the Department of
Defense does not expect to receive any
adverse comments, and so a proposed
rule is unnecessary.
DATES: The rule will be effective on
November 26, 2012 unless comments
are received that would result in a
contrary determination. Comments will
be accepted on or before November 16,
2012. If adverse comment is received,
DoD will publish a timely withdrawal of
the rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria,
VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
32 CFR Part 319
For a summary of the regulatory
findings and analyses regarding this
rulemaking, please refer to the findings
and analyses published with the interim
final rule, which can be found at 77 FR
18907, which are adopted herein. The
rule became effective April 13, 2012. As
noted above, the Department has
considered the comments submitted in
response to the interim final rule, and
does not adopt them. Thus, the rule
remains in effect without modification.
In addition, as noted in the interim
final rule, this rule was submitted to
and reviewed by OMB pursuant to E.O.
12866. The Department of State has also
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January
18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation
is consistent with the guidance therein.
Accordingly, the Interim Final Rule
amending 22 CFR parts 22 and 42 which
was published at 77 FR 18907 on March
29, 2012, is adopted as final without
change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Dated: September 4, 2012.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management,
U.S. Department of State.
57013
Direct Final Rule and Significant
Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking
meets the criteria for a direct final rule
because it involves non-substantive
changes dealing with DoD’s
management of its Privacy Programs.
DoD expects no opposition to the
changes and no significant adverse
comments. However, if DoD receives a
significant adverse comment, the
Department will withdraw this direct
final rule by publishing a notice in the
Federal Register. A significant adverse
comment is one that explains: (1) Why
the direct final rule is inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach; or (2)
why the direct final rule will be
ineffective or unacceptable without a
change. In determining whether a
comment necessitates withdrawal of
this direct final rule, DoD will consider
whether it warrants a substantive
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57012-57013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22862]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 8026]
22 CFR Parts 22 and 42
RIN 1400-AD06
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates
AGENCY: Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking addresses public comments regarding an Interim
Final Rule that makes changes to the Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services (Schedule) for a number of different visa fees. The Department
of State adopts the rule as final, without change.
DATES: Effective September 17, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Special Assistant, Office of the
Comptroller, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State; phone:
202-663-1576, telefax: 202-663-2526; email: fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For the complete explanation of the
background of this rule, including the rationale for the change, the
authority of the Department of State (``Department'') to make the fee
changes in question, and an explanation of the study that produced the
fee amounts, consult the prior public notices: 77 FR 18907 (March 29,
2012); 77 FR 20294 (April 4, 2012); and 75 FR 14111 (March 24, 2010).
Background
The Department published an interim final rule in the Federal
Register (77 FR 18907, March 29, 2012) amending 22 CFR parts 22 and 42.
Specifically, the rule made changes to the Schedule of Fees for
Consular Services for visa fees and provided 60 days for comments from
the public. During the comment period 18 comments were received, either
by email or through the submission process at www.regulations.gov. The
Department analyzed these 18 comments and reproduces that analysis in
the Analysis of Comments section below.
This rule finalizes the following fees for the categories below, as
determined by the Cost of Service Model (CoSM), which took effect on
April 13, 2012.
Non-Petition based Nonimmigrant Visa Application (except E
category): from $140 to $160
H, L, O, P, Q and R visa categories: from $150 to $190
E visa category: from $390 to $270
K visa category: from $350 to $240
BCC Adult: from $140 to $160
BCC Minor: from $14 to $15
Family-Based Immigrant visa: from $330 to $230
Employment-Based Immigrant visa: from $720 to $405
Other Immigrant visas (including I-360 self-petitioners and
special immigrant visas): from $305 to $220
Diversity Visa Lottery Fee (per person applying as a result of
the lottery program): from $440 to $330
Determining Returning Resident Status: from $380 to $275
Transportation Letters for Lawful Permanent Residents of the
United States: from $165 to $0
Analysis of Comments
The interim rule was published for public comment on March 29,
2012. During this period, the Department received 18 comments/
questions. The following analysis addresses these 18 comments.
Four comments were questions regarding when the fee changes took
effect. To answer: applicants paid the fee amount that was effective on
the date they paid the fee. Receipts for fees paid under the prior fee
schedule were accepted for 90 days following the effective fee change
(i.e., July 12, 2012). In short, if a fee was paid on or before April
12, 2012 the receipt for the prior fee was valid until July 12, 2012.
If a fee was paid April 13, 2012 or later, an applicant paid the new
fee.
Four comments criticized the increase of the nonimmigrant visa
application processing fee, arguing that the increase would make it
more difficult for visitors to bring their families to the United
States to visit. Although the Department understands the financial
difficulties that may result from a fee increase, the Department must
recover the cost of providing those services and sets the fees for
those services accordingly, including nonimmigrant visa application
processing fees.
Seven comments from H-2 employers opposed the H visa fee increase
from $150 to $190. Those comments stated that the fee increase would be
an added tax burden and competitive disadvantage for U.S. domestic food
producers who compete in a global marketplace. The comments also stated
that increasing the cost of the H-2 visa to fund expanded adjudication
capacity and physical infrastructure improvements at consulates in
China and Brazil was unfair because very few H-2 workers come from
either of these countries. In addition, the comments questioned whether
the H-2 fee increase would lead to any improvements in the H-2 program,
particularly in Mexico where most employers hire their H-2 workers.
The Department is adjusting the processing fee for H-category visas
from $150 to $190 because processing an H visa application requires a
review of extensive documentation and a more in-depth interview of the
applicant than for other categories of nonimmigrant visas. Because the
fees are set based on cost, a more time-consuming process necessarily
will result in a higher fee. Although some of the comments expressed
the belief that adjudicating H category visas should require simpler
processing for repeat applicants, the Cost of Service Model (CoSM)
showed that H visas require more time and resources to process than
others. The Department determined it would be fairer to charge a higher
fee for those visa categories requiring more complex processing (H, L,
O, P, Q, R, E, and K), rather than spreading those additional costs out
across all other visa categories. In addition, the fees established by
this rule are based on unit costs, which represent the global average
costs for each service as a whole. The most recent CoSM, the activity-
based costing model the Department used to determine the new processing
fees, improved substantially upon prior cost of service models by
identifying unit costs not just for nonimmigrant visas as a whole, but
for specific visa classes that involved more work to process. The CoSM
did not, however, distinguish between subcategories of visas within a
single category, such as an H-1B versus an H-2. Instead, the cost model
averaged together the cost of processing all subcategories within a
particular category of visa, which the Department used to calculate a
single processing fee for that visa category. Although the time to
process individual visa applications will vary from application to
application, the fee is set based on the average cost to process a visa
application from that visa category.
The costs for worldwide physical upgrades and personnel increases,
including in China and Brazil, were spread out across all nonimmigrant
visa categories in order to keep the impact minimal. In addition to the
upgrades to the Department's facilities in China and Brazil, the
Department opened a new consulate facility in Tijuana in 2010 and
[[Page 57013]]
plans to open a new facility in Monterrey in 2014. The Department also
recently opened application service centers in Mexicali, Piedras
Negras, and Reynosa to accommodate additional applicants along the
U.S.-Mexico border.
Of the three remaining comments, one noted its support for the
reduced K visa fee and one applauded the Department for decreasing
consular fees on certain nonimmigrant, immigrant, and special visa
services, while also expressing concern for the increases to the other
visa categories. One comment expressed a desire for a discount on all
minor NIVs, not just minor BCCs. We note that the Department is
required by law to set the fee for the minor BCC below cost at $15. The
same requirement does not apply to other minor NIVs, which the
Department sets on the basis of cost as described more fully above.
Conclusion
The Department has adjusted the fees to ensure that sufficient
resources are available to meet the costs of providing consular
services in light of the CoSM's findings. Pursuant to OMB guidance and
federal law, the Department endeavors to recover the cost of providing
services that benefit specific individuals rather than the public at
large. See OMB Circular A-25, sections 6(a)(1), (a)(2)(a); 31 U.S.C.
9701(b). For this reason, the Department has adjusted the Schedule.
Regulatory Findings
For a summary of the regulatory findings and analyses regarding
this rulemaking, please refer to the findings and analyses published
with the interim final rule, which can be found at 77 FR 18907, which
are adopted herein. The rule became effective April 13, 2012. As noted
above, the Department has considered the comments submitted in response
to the interim final rule, and does not adopt them. Thus, the rule
remains in effect without modification.
In addition, as noted in the interim final rule, this rule was
submitted to and reviewed by OMB pursuant to E.O. 12866. The Department
of State has also considered this rule in light of Executive Order
13563, dated January 18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation is
consistent with the guidance therein.
Accordingly, the Interim Final Rule amending 22 CFR parts 22 and 42
which was published at 77 FR 18907 on March 29, 2012, is adopted as
final without change.
Dated: September 4, 2012.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-22862 Filed 9-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P