Modification of Area Navigation (RNAV) Route Q-62; Northeast United States, 57010-57012 [2012-22802]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
57010
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(h) Optional Terminating Action
As optional terminating action to the
repetitive inspection requirements of this
AD:
(1) Replace the HPC drum rotor disk
assembly of engines listed in paragraph (c)(1)
of this AD with a redesigned HPC drum rotor
disk assembly in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney SB No. PW4ENG 72–817, dated
December 7, 2011.
(2) Replace the HPC drum rotor disk
assembly of engines listed in paragraph (c)(2)
of this AD with a redesigned HPC drum rotor
disk assembly in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Pratt &
Whitney SB No. PW4G–100–72–241, dated
November 15, 2011.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on October 22, 2012.
(i) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4G–100–72–240, Revision 1, dated June
12, 2012.
(ii) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4G–100–72–241, dated November 15,
2011.
(iii) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4ENG 72–816, Revision 1, dated June 12,
2012.
(iv) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4ENG 72–817, dated December 7, 2011.
(4) The following service information was
approved for IBR on October 18, 2010 (75 FR
55459, September 13, 2010).
(i) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4G–100–72–186, Revision 1, dated
September 2, 2004.
(ii) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4G–112–72–264, Revision 2, dated
February 23, 2010.
(iii) Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin No.
PW4ENG 72–796, dated June 11, 2009.
(5) For Pratt & Whitney service information
identified in this AD, contact Pratt &
Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford, CT
06108; phone: 860–565–7700; fax: 860–565–
1605.
(6) You may view this service information
at FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
(7) You may view this service information
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(i) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, piece-part
exposure means that the HPC drum rotor disk
assembly is removed from the engine and
completely disassembled.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
September 4, 2012.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make
your request. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2010–18–13,
Amendment 39–16427 (75 FR 55459,
September 13, 2010) are approved as AMOCs
for the corresponding requirements in
paragraph (f) of this AD.
[FR Doc. 2012–22534 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
(2) Remove from service any HPC drum
rotor disk assembly rear drum found with a
crack in any of the blade loading and locking
slots.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(g) Replacement of 13th, 14th, and 15th HPC
Seals
At the next piece-part exposure of the HPC
drum rotor disk assembly after the effective
date of this AD:
(1) Replace the 13th, 14th, and 15th stage
HPC seals with redesigned HPC seals of
engines listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD
in accordance with paragraphs 1.A through
1.C of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Pratt & Whitney Service Bulletin (SB) No.
PW4ENG 72–816, Revision 1, dated June 12,
2012.
(2) Replace the 13th, 14th, and 15th stage
HPC seals with redesigned HPC seals of
engines listed in paragraph (c)(2) of this AD
in accordance with paragraphs 1.A through
1.C of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Pratt & Whitney SB No. PW4G–100–72–240,
Revision 1, dated June 12, 2012.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact James Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7742; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: james.e.gray@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1407; Airspace
Docket No. 11–AGL–25]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of Area Navigation
(RNAV) Route Q–62; Northeast United
States
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies area
navigation (RNAV) route Q–62 by
extending it further west and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
incorporating two additional navigation
fixes. The route extension links two
RNAV Standard Terminal Arrival
Routes (STARs) serving the Chicago
O’Hare International Airport, IL,
terminal area with the high altitude
route. The FAA is taking this action to
increase National Airspace System
(NAS) efficiency and enhance flight
safety as aircraft transition from the en
route airway structure to the terminal
area airspace phase of flight.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC,
November 15, 2012. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group, Office of
Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On Monday, February 6, 2012, the
FAA published in the Federal Register
a notice of proposed rulemaking to
modify RNAV route Q–62 in Northeast
United States by extending it further
west (77 FR 5733). Interested parties
were invited to participate in this
rulemaking proceeding by submitting
written comments on this proposal to
the FAA. No comments were received.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
by extending high altitude RNAV route
Q–62 to the west to include the WATSN
and DAIFE fixes. This action links the
WATSN and HALIE RNAV STARs
serving Chicago O’Hare International
Airport, IL, with the high altitude route
and establishes a seamless transition for
westbound air traffic from the New York
metropolitan area into the Chicago
O’Hare International Airport, IL,
terminal area. Additionally, this action
reduces ATC system complexity, air
traffic controller and pilot workload,
voice communication requirements, and
aircraft fuel consumption. It also
expands the use of RNAV within the
NAS.
High altitude RNAV routes are
published in paragraph 2006 of FAA
Order 7400.9W dated August 8, 2012,
and effective September 15, 2012, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The RNAV route listed in this
document will be subsequently
published in the Order.
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it modifies the route structure of RNAV
routes as required to preserve the safe
and efficient flow of air traffic.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action is categorically excluded from
further environmental documentation
according to FAA Order 1050.1E,
paragraphs 311a, 311b, and 311i. The
implementation of this action will not
result in any extraordinary
circumstances in accordance with
paragraph 304 of Order 1050.1E.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, Dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 2006—United States Area
Navigation Routes
*
*
*
*
DAIFE, IN .............................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
NOLNN, OH .........................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
WEEVR, OH .........................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
PSKUR, OH ..........................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
FAALS, OH ..........................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
ALEEE, OH ...........................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
QUARM, PA .........................................................................
WP ........................................................................................
BURNI, PA ...........................................................................
FIX ........................................................................................
MCMAN, PA ........................................................................
FIX ........................................................................................
VALLO, PA ..........................................................................
FIX ........................................................................................
RAVINE, PA (RAV) .............................................................
VORTAC ..............................................................................
SUZIE, PA ............................................................................
FIX ........................................................................................
SARAA, PA ..........................................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
FIX ........................................................................................
FIX ........................................................................................
18:04 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Q–62 WATSN, IN to SARAA, PA [Amended]
WATSN, IN ..........................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
57011
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
(Lat. 41°17′00″ N.,
long. 86°02′07″ W.)
(Lat. 41°16′08″ N.,
long. 85°51′19″ W.)
(Lat. 41°14′04″ N.,
long. 84°38′12″ W.)
(Lat. 41°13′21″ N.,
long. 84°13′04″ W.)
(Lat. 41°09′16″ N.,
long. 82°42′57″ W.)
(Lat. 41°02′51″ N.,
long. 80°52′40″ W.)
(Lat. 41°00′28″ N.,
long. 80°31′54″ W.)
(Lat. 40°49′45″ N.,
long. 79°04′39″ W.)
(Lat. 40°39′25″ N.,
long. 77°48′14″ W.)
(Lat. 40°38′16″ N.,
long. 77°34′14″ W.)
(Lat. 40°37′37″ N.,
long. 77°26′18″ W.)
(Lat. 40°33′12″ N.,
long. 76°35′58″ W.)
(Lat. 40°27′12″ N.,
long. 75°58′22″ W.)
(Lat. 40°26′22″ N.,
long. 75°53′16″ W.)
57012
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 180 / Monday, September 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
11, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2012–22802 Filed 9–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 8026]
22 CFR Parts 22 and 42
RIN 1400–AD06
Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates
Bureau of Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rulemaking addresses
public comments regarding an Interim
Final Rule that makes changes to the
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services
(Schedule) for a number of different visa
fees. The Department of State adopts the
rule as final, without change.
DATES: Effective September 17, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Special Assistant, Office of the
Comptroller, Bureau of Consular Affairs,
Department of State; phone: 202–663–
1576, telefax: 202–663–2526; email:
fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For the
complete explanation of the background
of this rule, including the rationale for
the change, the authority of the
Department of State (‘‘Department’’) to
make the fee changes in question, and
an explanation of the study that
produced the fee amounts, consult the
prior public notices: 77 FR 18907
(March 29, 2012); 77 FR 20294 (April 4,
2012); and 75 FR 14111 (March 24,
2010).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Background
The Department published an interim
final rule in the Federal Register (77 FR
18907, March 29, 2012) amending 22
CFR parts 22 and 42. Specifically, the
rule made changes to the Schedule of
Fees for Consular Services for visa fees
and provided 60 days for comments
from the public. During the comment
period 18 comments were received,
either by email or through the
submission process at
www.regulations.gov. The Department
analyzed these 18 comments and
reproduces that analysis in the Analysis
of Comments section below.
This rule finalizes the following fees
for the categories below, as determined
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Sep 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
by the Cost of Service Model (CoSM),
which took effect on April 13, 2012.
• Non-Petition based Nonimmigrant
Visa Application (except E category):
from $140 to $160
• H, L, O, P, Q and R visa categories:
from $150 to $190
• E visa category: from $390 to $270
• K visa category: from $350 to $240
• BCC Adult: from $140 to $160
• BCC Minor: from $14 to $15
• Family-Based Immigrant visa: from
$330 to $230
• Employment-Based Immigrant visa:
from $720 to $405
• Other Immigrant visas (including I–
360 self-petitioners and special
immigrant visas): from $305 to $220
• Diversity Visa Lottery Fee (per person
applying as a result of the lottery
program): from $440 to $330
• Determining Returning Resident
Status: from $380 to $275
• Transportation Letters for Lawful
Permanent Residents of the United
States: from $165 to $0
Analysis of Comments
The interim rule was published for
public comment on March 29, 2012.
During this period, the Department
received 18 comments/questions. The
following analysis addresses these 18
comments.
Four comments were questions
regarding when the fee changes took
effect. To answer: applicants paid the
fee amount that was effective on the
date they paid the fee. Receipts for fees
paid under the prior fee schedule were
accepted for 90 days following the
effective fee change (i.e., July 12, 2012).
In short, if a fee was paid on or before
April 12, 2012 the receipt for the prior
fee was valid until July 12, 2012. If a fee
was paid April 13, 2012 or later, an
applicant paid the new fee.
Four comments criticized the increase
of the nonimmigrant visa application
processing fee, arguing that the increase
would make it more difficult for visitors
to bring their families to the United
States to visit. Although the Department
understands the financial difficulties
that may result from a fee increase, the
Department must recover the cost of
providing those services and sets the
fees for those services accordingly,
including nonimmigrant visa
application processing fees.
Seven comments from H–2 employers
opposed the H visa fee increase from
$150 to $190. Those comments stated
that the fee increase would be an added
tax burden and competitive
disadvantage for U.S. domestic food
producers who compete in a global
marketplace. The comments also stated
that increasing the cost of the H–2 visa
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to fund expanded adjudication capacity
and physical infrastructure
improvements at consulates in China
and Brazil was unfair because very few
H–2 workers come from either of these
countries. In addition, the comments
questioned whether the H–2 fee increase
would lead to any improvements in the
H–2 program, particularly in Mexico
where most employers hire their H–2
workers.
The Department is adjusting the
processing fee for H-category visas from
$150 to $190 because processing an H
visa application requires a review of
extensive documentation and a more indepth interview of the applicant than
for other categories of nonimmigrant
visas. Because the fees are set based on
cost, a more time-consuming process
necessarily will result in a higher fee.
Although some of the comments
expressed the belief that adjudicating H
category visas should require simpler
processing for repeat applicants, the
Cost of Service Model (CoSM) showed
that H visas require more time and
resources to process than others. The
Department determined it would be
fairer to charge a higher fee for those
visa categories requiring more complex
processing (H, L, O, P, Q, R, E, and K),
rather than spreading those additional
costs out across all other visa categories.
In addition, the fees established by this
rule are based on unit costs, which
represent the global average costs for
each service as a whole. The most recent
CoSM, the activity-based costing model
the Department used to determine the
new processing fees, improved
substantially upon prior cost of service
models by identifying unit costs not just
for nonimmigrant visas as a whole, but
for specific visa classes that involved
more work to process. The CoSM did
not, however, distinguish between
subcategories of visas within a single
category, such as an H–1B versus an H–
2. Instead, the cost model averaged
together the cost of processing all
subcategories within a particular
category of visa, which the Department
used to calculate a single processing fee
for that visa category. Although the time
to process individual visa applications
will vary from application to
application, the fee is set based on the
average cost to process a visa
application from that visa category.
The costs for worldwide physical
upgrades and personnel increases,
including in China and Brazil, were
spread out across all nonimmigrant visa
categories in order to keep the impact
minimal. In addition to the upgrades to
the Department’s facilities in China and
Brazil, the Department opened a new
consulate facility in Tijuana in 2010 and
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57010-57012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22802]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1407; Airspace Docket No. 11-AGL-25]
RIN 2120-AA66
Modification of Area Navigation (RNAV) Route Q-62; Northeast
United States
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action modifies area navigation (RNAV) route Q-62 by
extending it further west and incorporating two additional navigation
fixes. The route extension links two RNAV Standard Terminal Arrival
Routes (STARs) serving the Chicago O'Hare International Airport, IL,
terminal area with the high altitude route. The FAA is taking this
action to increase National Airspace System (NAS) efficiency and
enhance flight safety as aircraft transition from the en route airway
structure to the terminal area airspace phase of flight.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, November 15, 2012. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace, Regulations
and ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On Monday, February 6, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to modify RNAV route Q-62 in
Northeast United States by extending it further west (77 FR 5733).
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written comments on this proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by extending high altitude RNAV route Q-62 to the west to
include the WATSN and DAIFE fixes. This action links the WATSN and
HALIE RNAV STARs serving Chicago O'Hare International Airport, IL, with
the high altitude route and establishes a seamless transition for
westbound air traffic from the New York metropolitan area into the
Chicago O'Hare International Airport, IL, terminal area. Additionally,
this action reduces ATC system complexity, air traffic controller and
pilot workload, voice communication requirements, and aircraft fuel
consumption. It also expands the use of RNAV within the NAS.
High altitude RNAV routes are published in paragraph 2006 of FAA
Order 7400.9W dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV route
listed in this document will be subsequently published in the Order.
[[Page 57011]]
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies the route structure of RNAV routes as required to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action is categorically excluded
from further environmental documentation according to FAA Order
1050.1E, paragraphs 311a, 311b, and 311i. The implementation of this
action will not result in any extraordinary circumstances in accordance
with paragraph 304 of Order 1050.1E.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, Dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 2006--United States Area Navigation Routes
* * * * *
Q-62 WATSN, IN to SARAA, PA [Amended]
WATSN, IN............................... FIX............................ (Lat. 41[deg]17'00'' N., long.
86[deg]02'07'' W.)
DAIFE, IN............................... WP............................. (Lat. 41[deg]16'08'' N., long.
85[deg]51'19'' W.)
NOLNN, OH............................... WP............................. (Lat. 41[deg]14'04'' N., long.
84[deg]38'12'' W.)
WEEVR, OH............................... WP............................. (Lat. 41[deg]13'21'' N., long.
84[deg]13'04'' W.)
PSKUR, OH............................... WP............................. (Lat. 41[deg]09'16'' N., long.
82[deg]42'57'' W.)
FAALS, OH............................... WP............................. (Lat. 41[deg]02'51'' N., long.
80[deg]52'40'' W.)
ALEEE, OH............................... WP............................. (Lat. 41[deg]00'28'' N., long.
80[deg]31'54'' W.)
QUARM, PA............................... WP............................. (Lat. 40[deg]49'45'' N., long.
79[deg]04'39'' W.)
BURNI, PA............................... FIX............................ (Lat. 40[deg]39'25'' N., long.
77[deg]48'14'' W.)
MCMAN, PA............................... FIX............................ (Lat. 40[deg]38'16'' N., long.
77[deg]34'14'' W.)
VALLO, PA............................... FIX............................ (Lat. 40[deg]37'37'' N., long.
77[deg]26'18'' W.)
RAVINE, PA (RAV)........................ VORTAC......................... (Lat. 40[deg]33'12'' N., long.
76[deg]35'58'' W.)
SUZIE, PA............................... FIX............................ (Lat. 40[deg]27'12'' N., long.
75[deg]58'22'' W.)
SARAA, PA............................... FIX............................ (Lat. 40[deg]26'22'' N., long.
75[deg]53'16'' W.)
[[Page 57012]]
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 11, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2012-22802 Filed 9-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
