Special Regulations, Areas of the National Park System; Mammoth Cave National Park, Bicycle Routes, 56117-56124 [2012-22438]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a temporary safety zone.
This rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0818 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0818 Safety Zone for Fireworks
Display, Potomac River, National Harbor
Access Channel; Oxon Hill, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following area
is a safety zone: All waters of the
Potomac River, National Harbor Access
Channel, within a 150 yards radius of a
fireworks discharge platform in
approximate position latitude 38°47′01″
N, longitude 077°01′17″ W, located at
Oxon Hill in Prince Georges County,
Maryland (NAD 1983).
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.23 apply to the safety zone created
by this temporary § 165.T05–0818.
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Baltimore.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage within the zone must
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56117
request authorization from the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative by telephone at 410–576–
2693 or on VHF–FM marine band radio
channel 16.
(3) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio channels
13 and 16.
(4) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. Captain of the Port
Baltimore means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by Federal, State
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. through
11:00 p.m. on September 12, 2012 and,
if necessary due to inclement weather,
from 8:30 p.m. through 11 p.m. on
September 13, 2012.
Dated: August 27, 2012.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012–22570 Filed 9–10–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS–MACA–10037; 5531–SZM]
RIN 1024–AD80
Special Regulations, Areas of the
National Park System; Mammoth Cave
National Park, Bicycle Routes
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
56118
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
This rule designates four
bicycle routes within Mammoth Cave
National Park to address the interest and
demand of the visiting public for
bicycling opportunities without
compromising the National Park
Service’s mandate ‘‘to conserve the
scenery and the natural and historic
objects and the wild life’’ in the park.
This rule will implement portions of the
park’s Comprehensive Trail
Management Plan and satisfy the
requirement of National Park Service
general regulations that a special
regulation be promulgated to allow offroad bicycle use on routes outside of
developed areas. This rule allows
bicycle use on a new Connector Trail in
the vicinity of Maple Springs; a new Big
Hollow Trail in the hilly country of the
park north of the Green River; the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail; and the White Oak Trail.
DATES: The rule is effective October 12,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
Kern, Management Assistant, Mammoth
Cave National Park, National Park
Service, P.O. Box 7, Mammoth Cave,
Kentucky 42259; phone: (270) 758–
2187; email: Ken_Kern@nps.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
Mammoth Cave National Park (MACA
or park) is the core of the largest, most
complex, and best known karst area in
the world. Karst is a geologic term
which refers to areas of irregular
limestone in which erosion has
produced features such as fissures,
sinkholes, underground streams, sinking
springs, and caverns. The many types of
geologic features present within the
extensive cave system are the product of
a unique set of conditions found
nowhere else. The 365 miles of
passageways that have been surveyed
and mapped define Mammoth Cave as
the longest cave system in the world.
The mission of MACA is to protect
and preserve the extensive limestone
caverns and associated karst
topography, scenic river-ways, original
forests, other biological resources, and
evidence of past and contemporary
ways of life. MACA also strives to
educate and enrich the public through
scientific study and to provide for the
development and sustainable use of
recreational resources and opportunities
within the park.
Legislation and Purpose of the Park
As early as 1905, Members of the
Kentucky Congressional delegation
suggested Mammoth Cave as a national
park. In its April 18, 1926, report to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
Secretary of the Interior, the Southern
Appalachian National Park Commission
recommended national park status for
the Mammoth Cave region for, among
other reasons, the:
beautiful and wonderful formations * * *
great underground labyrinth * * * of
remarkable geological and recreational
interest perhaps unparalleled elsewhere
* * * [and] thousands of curious sinkholes
of varying sizes through which much of the
drainage is carried to underground streams,
there being few surface brooks or creeks
* * *.
The Commission also recommended
lands above ground in the region of the
cave for inclusion in the National Park
System because of the:
exceptional opportunity for developing a
great national recreational park of
outstanding service in the very heart of our
Nation’s densest population and at a time
when the need is increasingly urgent and
most inadequately provided for.
The United States Congress saw the
value of including surface lands as part
of the park. The Senate Committee on
Public Lands and Surveys (Report No.
823, May 10, 1926) and the House of
Representatives Committee on the
Public Lands (Report No. 1178, May 12,
1926) said the park would:
insure a great recreational ground * * *
where * * * thousands of our people may
find…the most delightful outdoor recreation
in * * * traversing the picturesque and
rugged hills and valleys and great forests of
the region included in the proposed park
area.
On May 25, 1926, Congress authorized
the establishment of MACA (44 Stat.
635), and on July 1, 1941, MACA was
established as a national park.
Subsequently, the Great Onyx Cave and
Crystal Cave properties were purchased
and added to the park on April 7, 1961.
The park now comprises 52,830 acres.
History of Trail Development
Public interest in outdoor recreation
at the Mammoth Cave area has not
diminished since the Southern
Appalachian National Park Commission
issued its report in 1926. Through the
years, park managers have responded to
changing trends in recreation. The Wild
Cave tour began in 1969, and a system
of backcountry trails was initiated in the
1970s. In the 1980s, a horse livery on
the park boundary began offering guided
rides on park trails and canoe and kayak
liveries began shuttle services on the
Green and Nolin rivers. In 2007, the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail was completed, connecting the
heart of the park with one of the
gateway communities (two other
gateway communities have expressed
interest in constructing similar trails);
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the 2007 Comprehensive Trail
Management Plan calls for bicycle use
on certain trails in the park.
The park currently has approximately
85 miles of open trail. All trails are open
to hiking, approximately 55 miles of
trail are open to horses, approximately
17 miles of trail are open to bicycles,
and approximately 2.4 miles of trail
accommodate both horses and bicycles.
Shortly after the park was designated
in 1941, several short trails were
developed in the vicinity of the
Mammoth Cave Hotel and Historic cave
entrance. Over the years, these trails
were improved and expanded into a
series of loops which compose the first
6.5 miles of the front-country trail
system in the vicinity of the park’s
visitor center and nearby Green River.
Other trails, including trails at Sloans
Pond, Turnhole Bend, Sand Cave, and
Cedar Sink, were developed as short
hikes to park features.
In the early 1970s, the park planned
a series of trails in the more than 20,000
acres north of the Green River. In 1974,
those trails were officially opened to
hiking and horseback riding. The main
trails of that 55-mile system followed
old and pre-existing dirt roads, with the
remaining trails built as connections
between those dirt roads to create loops.
In 1999, a local biking club asked park
management about the possibility of
permitting bicycling on one or more
trails in the park. After consideration by
the park, approximately 13 miles of
trails were opened to bicycling on an
experimental basis, while continuing to
allow hiking and horseback riding on
the same trails.
In February 2005, park officials
organized the first Backcountry Summit
meeting between MACA, the Bowling
Green League of Bicyclists, the Sierra
Club, and the Mammoth Cave
Equestrian Trail Riders Association. The
purpose of this meeting was to provide
an avenue of communication between
park officials and all user groups
regarding improving and maintaining
backcountry trails and other
backcountry issues.
Comprehensive Trail Management Plan
and Environmental Assessment
The park developed a Comprehensive
Trail Management Plan (CTMP) and
Environmental Assessment (EA) in 2007
to ensure protection of park resources
and address increasing demand for
public use of trails. The purpose of the
CTMP was to develop and implement
objectives and strategies for the
protection, management, and use of
trails park-wide for a period of 10 years.
The plan identifies designated trails and
access points as well as the type of
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
activity (hiking, biking, horseback
riding, or a combination of those
activities) for which each trail could be
used.
The park staff utilized NPS
Management Policies 2006 and the
purposes for which the park was
established by Congress to develop
objectives and ensure the
appropriateness of designating trails and
the uses allowed for each trail within
MACA.
One of the most important concepts
incorporated into the CTMP is
sustainability. Under the plan, the park
will use sustainable material and
techniques for trail maintenance, future
trail design, and construction projects.
The park will use techniques such as
maximum grade limits, water bars, and
large dips in the trail called grade
reversals to minimize or slow erosion
from water and use. The park will build
bridges and utilize materials such as
gravel, landscape timbers, and geotextile
to create a more durable trail surface
and protect potentially vulnerable trail
features.
Because the CTMP proposed actions,
such as constructing trails and changing
trail alignments, that could have
environmental consequences, NPS was
required by the National Environmental
Policy Act to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of those actions.
The associated EA evaluated several
alternative proposed actions or
variations for a trail plan, including a
‘‘no action’’ alternative that would not
change the way the trails were then
managed. The draft plan and
accompanying EA were prepared after a
public meeting on June 29, 2006, and
after a public scoping period from June
29, 2006, to July 14, 2006. After the draft
plan and accompanying EA were
prepared and published, NPS held a
second public meeting on February 7,
2008, in conjunction with a 60-day
comment period from January 24, 2008,
to March 24, 2008.
Selected Alternative
On November 14, 2008, the park
selected Alternative 4 described in the
EA. A Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for the selected alternative was
approved on December 17, 2008. The
NPS has determined bicycle use to be
appropriate for certain trails in MACA,
with the incorporation of sustainable
design, construction, and maintenance
standards and materials. Minimizing
trail damage and deterioration and
environmental impacts is an essential
element of Alternative 4. Under
Alternative 4, the Big Hollow Trail will
be constructed for bicycle use but will
not be open to horses. Bicycle use will
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
be eliminated on the Sal Hollow,
Buffalo, and portions of the Turnhole
Bend Trails, which will revert to hiking
and horse use only.
Public comment was overwhelmingly
in support of Alternative 4 and opposed
to the park’s preferred alternative,
Alternative 5. The primary difference
between these two alternatives is that
under Alternative 4, the NPS will
construct a new trail primarily for
bicycle use whereas Alternative 5 called
for removal of horses from the existing
First Creek Trail in order to allow
bicycles on that trail. Creating a new
trail for bicycle use and reverting some
trails to hiking and horse use only will
enhance recreational opportunities for a
variety of park users.
The EA is available online at https://
www.nps.gov/maca/parkmgmt/
planning.htm, and the CTMP and
FONSI are available online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/
projectHome.cfm?projectID=17179, then
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
Trails Designated for Bicycle Use
Connector Trail
A new Connector Trail will be
designed and constructed for the
purpose of connecting access points and
other areas with trails, including the
Maple Springs Group Campground,
Maple Springs Trailhead, Mammoth
Cave International Center for Science
and Learning, Big Hollow Trailhead,
and the Raymer Hollow Trailhead. This
approximately 1.5 mile Connector Trail
will run from the Maple Springs
Trailhead to the Raymer Hollow
Trailhead, and will be a wide,
hardened-gravel trail to withstand
heavy, two-way traffic of hikers,
bicyclists, and horseback riders. The
section of the Connector Trail between
Maple Springs Trailhead and the Big
Hollow Trailhead will be designated as
multiple-use, and the section from the
Big Hollow Trailhead to the Raymer
Hollow will be restricted to hikers and
horses. As part of the Connector Trail
development, the existing parking lot at
the Maple Springs Trailhead will be
improved and expanded. This lot will
add parking capacity for the trail system
and allow bicyclists, hikers and
equestrian access to the horse and
hiking trails or Big Hollow Trail without
using park roads.
When the Connector Trail is
complete, the trailhead and trails at the
Good Spring Baptist Church will be
eliminated, as access will no longer be
needed to the Raymer Hollow Trail.
Elimination of these trails and the
trailhead will greatly reduce the impact
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56119
on and degradation of the Good Spring
Baptist Church cultural site.
Currently, the only way for
equestrians, bicyclists, and hikers to
access trailheads is by using the Maple
Springs Loop Road and the Good Spring
Church Road, which can be congested
with large pickup trucks, horse trailers,
and other passenger vehicles. Use of
these roadways creates a potential
hazard for trail users. The Connector
Trail will provide an alternative to using
these roads and increase public safety
by getting these trail users away from
the roads and the potential for collision
with vehicles.
Big Hollow Trail
The selected alternative (Alternative
4) includes the development of the sixmile-long Big Hollow Trail, which will
be constructed east of the Green River
Ferry Road-North and on the ridge west
of Big Hollow. Bicycling and hiking will
be allowed on the Big Hollow Trail, but
the trail will be closed to horse use.
Public comments on the EA
substantially supported construction of
this trail for bicycle use.
This new trail increases opportunities
for bicycle use without reducing the
number of trails accessible to horse use,
while maintaining separation of horse
and bicycle users. Separation of these
activities should improve the
recreational experience for user groups
and offer bicyclists access to
backcountry scenery.
Since the trail will involve new
construction, the selected alternative
will have more impact on park
resources than other alternatives, but we
concluded it will not have a significant
effect on the environment. Vegetation
will be removed on the trail surface, and
cleared along the trail margins, and
sustainable materials and construction
techniques will be used to build the
trail, which will help control and
minimize surface degradation, erosion,
and other effects on surrounding park
resources. The Big Hollow Trail will not
pass through floodplains, cross streams,
or be located near wetlands, and
therefore is expected to have no new
impacts on water resources.
Vegetation and tree removal identified
in the selected alternative will be
completed in accordance with the
‘‘Biological Opinion for the Effects of
the Hazard Tree Removal and
Vegetation Management Program to the
Indiana Bat at Mammoth Cave National
Park, Kentucky’’ to ensure the activities
will be considered ‘‘not likely to
adversely affect’’ the species.
To minimize any effect on
archeological resources, the park has
surveyed areas where ground
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
56120
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
disturbance will take place and adjusted
trail alignment to avoid adverse
impacts.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail
An environmental assessment for the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail was completed in 1999 and
amended in 2004. Between 2004 and
2007, the NPS constructed this
approximately nine-mile-long, graveled
hiking and biking trail. The Mammoth
Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail follows
the general route of a historic railroad
bed leading from the visitor center to
the park boundary at Park City and
receives significant daily use. The trail
passes close enough to the campground
area to provide hiking and bicycling
opportunities for those camping at the
park. The trail continues past the
campground, through valleys and higher
elevations on the ridge-tops, providing
the user with a varied ecological view
of the park. Several wayside exhibits
along the trail recount historic facts
regarding the old railroad route,
including past events and structures
that played a significant role in the
history of the area. The Mammoth Cave
Railroad Bike & Hike Trail was designed
and constructed utilizing modern
technology and sustainable design. The
eight-foot-wide graveled surface was
designed to offer a comparatively easy,
family-style bicycle trail as opposed to
the single-track, mountain-biking type
of experience.
The Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike &
Hike Trail will connect to historic Bell’s
Tavern upon completion of Park City’s
bike trail. The park has received
expressions of interest from the
communities of Cave City and
Brownsville to construct similar bike
trails that could connect with the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail. These improvements would
provide opportunities for the use of the
park and contribute to the ‘‘Connecting
People to Parks’’ initiative of the NPS
and the President’s ‘‘America’s Great
Outdoors’’ initiative.
White Oak Trail
The CTMP also identified the 2.4mile-long White Oak Trail as a multipleuse trail, and this rule will designate it
as a trail for bicycle use in addition to
hiking and horseback riding. The trail is
on an old roadbed and is wide, fairly
level, and currently has a relatively low
level of use. The flat and wide nature of
the trail provides conditions that will
tend to minimize user conflicts and
support the multiple-use designation.
The NPS will continue to occasionally
use the White Oak Trail for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
administrative vehicle access to
backcountry sites for emergency
response and to conduct maintenance
and monitoring activities.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On May 17, 2011, NPS published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the
designation of bicycle trails at MACA
(76 FR 28388). The proposed rule for
bicycle use was based upon the selected
action (Alternative 4) described in the
EA and FONSI. The proposed rule was
available for public comment from May
17, 2011, through July 18, 2011.
Summary of and Responses to Public
Comments
Comments were accepted through the
mail, hand delivery, and through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. A total of 21
public comment documents were
received during the comment period,
two from organizations and the rest
from individuals. A summary of
comments and NPS responses is
provided below.
1. Comment: The White Oak Trail
needs to remain open to horses in the
future.
Response: Under the final rule, the
NPS will not close the White Oak Trail
to equestrians. The White Oak Trail will
be a multiple/shared use trail for all
backcountry users.
2. Comment: Shared use of the White
Oak Trail is acceptable due to the low
level of trail use. It has been proven that
bicyclists can successfully share trails
with hikers.
Response: The White Oak Trail
consists of an administrative road that
has a wide, relatively level surface and
that receives comparatively little traffic
by any users and therefore was
determined appropriate for shared use
by hikers, bikers, and equestrians.
3. Comment: There is no need to open
up any new trails in the park’s
backcountry area north of the river or to
allow bicycles on the Big Hollow Trail
since there are ample recreation
opportunities for families and visitors in
the park and for bicyclists to ride.
Response: The NPS does not agree
with this comment, but does recognize
that individuals have a variety of
opinions regarding the management and
regulation of activities within units of
the National Park System. The park
undertook a diligent planning process
involving the park’s trail user groups
and stakeholders, obtaining their input
in developing the CTMP and the
alternatives described in the CTMP. The
CTMP identified management objectives
and strategies to guide the protection,
management, maintenance, and use of
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the trails in the park, including the
development of new trails such as the
Big Hollow Trail. The CTMP identified
appropriate types of trail use and
determined that bicycle use on
designated trails is appropriate. The
public interest in this planning process
was high, and public input was
considered and incorporated into the
plan as part of the decision-making
process.
4. Comment: The park needs to
rehabilitate and maintain the existing
trails before building any new trails.
The money spent on new trails would
be better spent maintaining the
established trails.
Response: To improve trail
conditions, the park is implementing
other elements of the CTMP that address
trail maintenance and sustainability.
The park believes it can accomplish
these goals concurrently with building
the new Big Hollow Trail and Connector
Trail.
5. Comment: Mountain bicycling is an
activity that is in keeping with the
mission of the NPS.
Response: The NPS has a goal of
providing high quality bicycling
opportunities for visitors in appropriate
areas and in a manner consistent with
our stewardship responsibilities. The
NPS is committed to identifying and
providing opportunities for the public to
participate in outdoor recreation to
promote health and wellness. NPS
Director Jonathan Jarvis unveiled the
‘‘Healthy Parks Healthy People US’’
initiative to highlight the unique role
that our nation’s national parks play in
promoting health and wellness through
outdoor recreation activities such as
bicycling. The President introduced the
‘‘America’s Great Outdoors’’ initiative to
reconnect people to the outdoors and
promote activities that enhance health
and wellness. A key goal of this
initiative for federal agencies is to
increase and improve recreational
access and opportunities. During the
CTMP planning process, the park
received 2,905 public comments on the
plan and only one of those comments
stated a concern that the use of
mountain bikes on trails in MACA was
inconsistent with the mission of the
NPS.
6. Comment: Significant health
benefits can be derived from bicycling
and trail users at the park would benefit
from enhanced outdoor recreational
opportunities and access. Bicycling is a
low impact, healthy, safe activity which
should be encouraged in our parks.
Biking fights obesity and nature deficit
disorder, providing additional
opportunities to exercise and better
quality of life. The First Lady’s ‘‘Let’s
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Move!’’ campaign specifically addresses
these problems and biking is a
significant part of the solution. Bicycle
routes create another method of exercise
and opportunity to enjoy the park,
create high quality recreational
experiences, and add significant value
to park resources. Providing biking
opportunities will make the Mammoth
Cave area more attractive to people who
appreciate active types of recreation.
Adding mountain bicycling to trails at
MACA is the type of action
contemplated by the President’s
‘‘America’s Great Outdoors’’ initiative to
connect Americans to their natural
surroundings through outdoor
recreation.
Response: The NPS is engaged in a
wide-ranging effort to bring the outdoors
into the public discussion about public
health and to expand opportunities for
people seeking a more active lifestyle.
As part of this effort, NPS Director Jarvis
initiated the ‘‘Healthy Parks Healthy
People U.S.’’ program to highlight the
unique role that our nation’s national
parks play in promoting health and
wellness. Studies have shown being in
the outdoors and participating in
outdoor activities can reduce stress and
anxiety, foster mental and physical
health, and promote learning and
personal growth. The health benefits
derived from outdoor physical activities
such as bicycling are well documented.
Recently, the media has reported that
doctors have been writing ‘‘Park
Prescriptions’’ which prescribe park
visits to get patients outside to exercise
and receive the benefits of sun and fresh
air. Implementing the final rule will
increase and improve recreational
opportunities for all trail users and high
quality backcountry experiences.
Equestrians have access to the Sal
Hollow Trail as they requested. Hikers
will have access to a backcountry trail
which is free of horse impacts and
manure. Bicyclists will be able to enjoy
the Big Hollow Trail, the White Oak
Trail, the Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike
& Hike Trail, and the Connector Trail.
Providing these recreational
opportunities to the public will directly
support the First Lady’s ‘‘Let’s Move’’
campaign to specifically address the
public health crisis of obesity.
7. Comment: Mountain biking has
been managed successfully at other NPS
units with minimal environmental
impact. Other land managing agencies
have found ways to manage mountain
bicycling on their lands.
Response: Several NPS units offer
biking on single track trails, and many
more allow riding on unpaved or dirt
roads, providing numerous examples of
successful, well-planned cycling venues
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
in the National Park System. Scientific
studies have shown that the
environmental impacts of mountain
biking are similar to those of hiking and
less than those of other uses. Under the
final rule, NPS will manage appropriate
use of bicycles on identified trails in
accordance with applicable laws,
regulations, and policies. Such
management will assure protection of
the park’s natural, cultural, scenic,
wildlife, and aesthetic values while
promoting visitor connections with the
park, increasing appreciation of park
resources, and providing healthy
outdoor recreation opportunities.
8. Comment: Local bicycle clubs and
cyclists provide volunteer support to the
park, making an important contribution
to maintaining park trails. Local
bicycling groups have adopted trails
they ride providing volunteer
backcountry patrols and maintenance to
ensure the trails are environmentally
sustainable. Members of the biking
community have demonstrated their
commitment to preserving and
maintaining the resources at MACA.
The Sal Hollow Trail is currently the
best trail in the park because the local
bicycle clubs and cyclists have
volunteered over 200 hours of trail
maintenance work per year for several
years to keep the trail in this condition.
Volunteer trail work provides service
opportunities for people interested in
helping maintain and create sustainable
trails.
Response: Local bicycling
organizations have been participating in
volunteer trail projects at the park for
many years, thereby demonstrating their
commitment to trail stewardship. The
conditions of the trails they have been
working on are among the best in the
park. Park management will continue to
work with the Mammoth Cave
Backcountry Summit Council as an
umbrella organization to coordinate and
promote trail-related volunteer
activities. Encouraging and supporting
continued volunteer participation in
trail maintenance activities by all user
groups is a key management objective
that is vital to establishing sustainable
trails and protecting park resources.
9. Comment: The CTMP for the park
should be fully implemented, as it was
developed through sound procedures
analyzing a variety of alternatives and
included a comprehensive analysis of
the impacts of allowing bicycles on the
identified trails and examined the
potential long term, short term and
cumulative impacts of its
implementation, following both the
letter and spirit of the law. The
proposed rule is in keeping with the
decisions reached through the CTMP
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56121
process. The plan was developed with
significant public input drawing on the
expertise and desire of a wide array of
trail users. The CTMP is
environmentally and socially
responsible. The plan reflects careful
attention to preservation of the park’s
historical and natural resources. The
park solicited public comment on the
options before deciding which option
would be best for the park and all user
groups. During the CTMP process, the
park received only two substantive
comments indicating any negative
perceptions regarding biking at MACA.
Those arguments were founded on the
lack of a special regulation, not on the
use of bicycles on trails. The
exceptionally low comment total and
lack of opposition to the actual bicycle
use indicates that the substance of the
CTMP is relatively non-controversial,
requiring only this final procedure to
garner broad community support.
Response: The park undertook a
diligent planning process involving the
park’s trail user groups and
stakeholders, obtaining their input in
developing the CTMP and its
alternatives. The plan identified
management objectives and strategies to
guide the protection, management,
maintenance, and use of the trails in the
park, including the development of new
trails such as the Big Hollow Trail. This
plan identified appropriate types of trail
use and included the determination that
bicycle use on designated trails is
appropriate. During civic engagement,
the public interest in this planning
process was high, and the public’s input
was considered and incorporated into
the plan as part of the decision making
process. This has resulted in broad local
support for the CTMP. The CTMP, along
with the accompanying EA and FONSI,
were completed and approved in
December 2008. Completion of this rulemaking process will address the
concerns that the park does not have a
special regulation designating the trails
outside of developed areas that were
selected in the CTMP for bicycle use.
10. Comment: The Organic Act directs
the NPS to provide for ‘‘enjoyment’’ of
the scenery, wildlife and natural and
historic objects conserved by the NPS.
The NPS Organic Act does not authorize
any and all forms of outdoor recreation
under the rubric of ‘‘enjoyment.’’
Mountain bicycling on single-track trails
in park backcountry is a highly suspect
form of ‘‘enjoyment’’ which may not be
consistent with the purpose of national
parks and of MACA.
Response: The park completed the
CTMP, EA, and FONSI in 2008. The
CTMP and EA were published for a 60day review and comment period. During
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
56122
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
this civic engagement, the public
interest in this planning process was
high. The park received 2,905 public
comments on the plan and only one of
those comments stated a concern that
the use of bikes on backcountry trails in
MACA was inconsistent with the
mission of the NPS. Through the park’s
planning and monitoring efforts,
coupled with the input received from
the public, the park determined that
bicycling (recreational and mountain
biking) is an appropriate use on certain
park trails. This final rule specifically
designates which trails in the park are
open to bicycle use. Big Hollow Trail
will be the only single-track trail open
to bicycle use in the park. The
limitations on bicycle use in 36 CFR
4.30 and this rule allow NPS to manage
appropriate use of bicycles on the trails
in accordance with applicable laws,
regulations, and policies to ensure that
the park is protecting natural, cultural,
scenic, and wildlife resources while also
preserving the aesthetic values of a
backcountry experience for all users.
The NPS has determined that
implementing this special rule at MACA
does not constitute a violation of the
Organic Act or MACA’s enabling
legislation.
11. Comment: The NPS has decided to
construct a mountain bicycle trail in a
roadless and undeveloped area of
MACA and the unprecedented nature of
that decision has created an impact of
great significance for the National Park
System and the park. This is the first
time that the NPS has undertaken
construction of a mountain bike trail in
any area of the National Park System.
Response: The Big Hollow Trail will
be located in the area north of the Green
River and east of the Green River Ferry
Road. This area is not roadless and
undeveloped, but rather contains many
signs of past human use of the land,
including sunken wagon and road
traces, fence lines, power line corridors,
old fields, reforestation plots, gullies
and erosion control check dams, wells,
chimneys, and building foundations.
The Big Hollow Trail is not exclusively
a mountain bike trail. It will be a shared
use trail designated for use by hikers
and bikers. This trail was designed and
will be constructed to sustainable
standards to support these uses. The
park will be managing the appropriate
use of bicycles on the designated trails,
including the Big Hollow Trail, in
accordance with applicable laws,
regulations, and policies to assure the
protection of the park’s natural, cultural,
scenic, wildlife, and aesthetic values.
This trail is not the first mountain bike
trail constructed in a park area of the
National Park System. Currently, there
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
are several NPS units that have
constructed mountain bike trails for
riding and many more which allow
mountain bike riding on unpaved roads.
These trails are excellent examples of
providing new opportunities for
enjoying park areas in the National Park
System. Some of these NPS units have
constructed trails with bicycling and
hiking as the primary intended uses.
Several park units have completed a
public process establishing special
regulations which designated specific
trails as open for bicycle use. Additional
park units are currently working
through the special regulation process to
designate specific trails outside of
developed areas for bicycle use. The
requirements of 36 CFR 4.30 will still
apply to any NPS unit which proposes
to designate specific trails outside of
developed areas for bicycle use.
12. Comment: This rulemaking would
establish bicycle use within a natural
area that was previously studied for
wilderness suitability in the park’s
Wilderness Study of 1974. The NPS
should reassess the roadless tracts of
MACA for suitability as wilderness. The
special regulation would establish a use
which would be required to be
displaced (since bicycles are banned in
wilderness) should Congress ever
designate wilderness in this area.
Response: The final rule is consistent
with the requirements of the Wilderness
Act. A Wilderness Study of the park was
completed and a recommendation made
that no lands in MACA be added to the
National Wilderness Preservation
System. There is no statutory
requirement that the park reassess the
roadless tracts for suitability as
wilderness. Although more than 70
years have passed since the
establishment of the park, the NPS
continues to believe that the area is not
suitable for wilderness because
numerous signs of past human use of
the land (e.g., sunken wagon/road
traces, fence lines, power line corridors,
old fields, reforestation plots, gullies
and erosion control check dams, wells,
chimneys, and building foundations) are
still apparent in the area where trail
development will occur.
13. Comment: The Big Hollow Trail
would be an asset to the park as well as
the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Big
Hollow Trail would be a great use of
this public land. Big Hollow Trail is
definitely a great idea to bring more
international attention to the area and to
highlight a piece of natural beauty that
our country has to offer.
Response: We agree that providing
these recreational opportunities to the
public will broaden the park’s appeal
with visitors looking for outdoor
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
recreation activities and high quality
backcountry experiences.
Changes from the Proposed Rule
Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the proposed
rule has been deleted because it is
duplicative with 36 CFR 4.30(d)(2).
Paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of the proposed rule
(now paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the final
rule) has been revised to make the speed
limit 15 miles per hour or as posted in
the park. This gives MACA the
flexibility to adjust the speed limit to
address visitor safety, health, or
resource management concerns.
Paragraph (c)(3) has been revised to
grant the Superintendent of MACA the
authority to open or close designated
bicycle routes, or to impose conditions
or restrictions for bicycle use after
taking into consideration public health
and safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management
activities and objectives. This authority
may be exercised independent of the
Superintendent’s authority under 36
CFR 1.5 and will provide the park with
greater flexibility to respond to the
impacts of bicycle use on designated
routes. Public notice of any action taken
under paragraph (c)(3)(i) must be given
pursuant to one or more of the methods
set forth in 36 CFR 1.7. Paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) was added to clarify that
violating a closure, condition, or
restriction established by the
Superintendent under paragraph (c)(3)
is prohibited. After consideration of the
public comments, the park has decided
that no other changes are necessary to
the proposed rule.
Compliance With Other Laws and
Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. OIRA has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This conclusion is
based on the results of an NPS economic
analysis of the effects of the rule, dated
November 17, 2009, available for review
at: https://www.nps.gov/maca/
parkmgmt/planning.htm, which
incorporated a regulatory flexibility
threshold analysis. The rule will
reasonably increase park visitation and
thereby generate benefits for businesses,
including small entities, through
increased visitor spending.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
There are no businesses in the
surrounding area economically
dependent on continued bicycle use on
these trails. The November 2009 NPS
economic analysis estimated that the
rule will add a benefit to local business
in the form of new visitors attracted to
the area to use the trails.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions. The rule will not
impose restrictions on local businesses
in the form of fees, training, record
keeping, or other measures that would
increase costs. The economic analysis
projected a net benefit for the Federal
government and a consumer surplus of
$24.02/day for new visitors and $12.01/
day for current visitors.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S. based enterprises to
compete with foreign based enterprises.
The rule is internal to NPS operations.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
rulemaking addresses only actions that
will be taken by the NPS. It will not
require any State, local or tribal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
government to take any action that is
not funded. It is an NPS-specific rule
and imposes no requirements on small
governments. A statement containing
the information required by the UMRA
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of
Executive Order 12630, this rule does
not have significant takings
implications. This rule designates park
trails inside the park, and though the
trails may connect with trails external to
the park, the rule does not require the
taking of private land outside the park.
A takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. This rule only effects use of
NPS administered lands. It has no effect
on other areas. A Federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it has
no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
tribal consultation policy is not
required. The question was considered
as part of the EA, and trails were
configured to avoid areas identified as
archeological sites, specifically any with
known burials. In addition to the EA,
past consultation with the tribes has
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56123
been important in the identification of
concerns or issues of cultural interest.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission under the PRA is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA)
We have prepared environmental
assessments to determine whether this
rule would have a significant impact on
the quality of the human environment
under the NEPA. This rule does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment. A detailed
statement under the NEPA is not
required because we reached a finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) for the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail and also for the other designated
bicycle routes. The environmental
assessment and FONSI for the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike
Trail and the EA for the Comprehensive
Trail Management Plan (CTMP) may be
reviewed at https://www.nps.gov/maca/
parkmgmt/planning.htm. The FONSI for
the CTMP may be reviewed at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/
projectHome.cfm?projectID=17179, and
then clicking on the link entitled
‘‘Document List.’’
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the National Park Service
amends 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for Part 7 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec.
7.96 also issued under 36 U.S.C. 501–511, DC
Code 10–137 (2001) and DC Code 50–2201.07
(2001).
2. In § 7.36 add paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
■
§ 7.36
Mammoth Cave National Park.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Bicycles. (1) The following trails
are designated as routes open to bicycle
use:
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
56124
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Connector Trail from the Big
Hollow Trailhead to the Maple Springs
Trailhead;
(ii) Big Hollow Trail;
(iii) Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike &
Hike Trail; and
(iv) White Oak Trail.
(2) The following are prohibited:
(i) Possessing a bicycle on routes or
trails not designated as open to bicycle
use;
(ii) Unless posted otherwise,
operating a bicycle in excess of 15 miles
per hour on designated routes; and
(iii) Failing to yield the right of way
to horses or hikers.
(3) The Superintendent may open or
close designated bicycle routes, or
portions thereof, or impose conditions
or restrictions for bicycle use after
taking into consideration public health
and safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management
activities and objectives.
(i) The Superintendent will provide
public notice of all such actions through
one or more of the methods listed in
§ 1.7 of this chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or
restriction is prohibited.
Dated: August 30, 2012.
Rachael Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012–22438 Filed 9–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–T3–P
I. What action is EPA taking?
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0826; FRL–9725–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan; PSD and NSR Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving specified
revisions to Michigan’s State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that EPA has
determined are consistent with the
Federal requirements of the prevention
of significant deterioration (PSD)
construction permit program for the
purpose of meeting the requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) with regard to
new source review (NSR) in Class I
areas attaining the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Sep 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0826. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone
Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886–0671 before
visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0671,
Blathras.Constantine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Michigan’s request
to revise its SIP to add rule R. 336.2816
to be consistent with Federal PSD
regulations in 40 CFR 51.166(p), that
require state PSD programs to have a
mechanism in place to coordinate and
consult with Federal land managers of
Class I PSD areas. On January 9, 2008,
EPA proposed to disapprove R.
336.2816 from Michigan’s SIP submittal
because it did not provide for such a
mechanism. Michigan has now revised
R. 336.2816 to be consistent with the
Federal requirement.
On March 25, 2010, EPA published a
direct final approval to convert a
conditional approval of the Michigan
PSD SIP to full approval under section
110 of the CAA. In that action, EPA
stated that we would be taking a
separate action on rule R. 336.2816(2)
through (4), (requirements relating to
Class I areas). Michigan has now revised
R. 336.2816 to be consistent with the
Federal requirement.
EPA is not acting on Michigan’s
request to revise its SIP by adding a
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
significance level for particulate matter
less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). EPA has
established a significance threshold to
limit the applicability of PSD and NSR
regulations to sources with emissions
above the significance level. To be
consistent with the Federal
requirements, Michigan amended R.
336.2801 and R. 336.2901 to add the
significance threshold for PM2.5.
Because Michigan is planning to submit
additional state rules as revisions to its
SIP for precursors of PM2.5, EPA will
defer action on this matter.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56117-56124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22438]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS-MACA-10037; 5531-SZM]
RIN 1024-AD80
Special Regulations, Areas of the National Park System; Mammoth
Cave National Park, Bicycle Routes
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56118]]
SUMMARY: This rule designates four bicycle routes within Mammoth Cave
National Park to address the interest and demand of the visiting public
for bicycling opportunities without compromising the National Park
Service's mandate ``to conserve the scenery and the natural and
historic objects and the wild life'' in the park. This rule will
implement portions of the park's Comprehensive Trail Management Plan
and satisfy the requirement of National Park Service general
regulations that a special regulation be promulgated to allow off-road
bicycle use on routes outside of developed areas. This rule allows
bicycle use on a new Connector Trail in the vicinity of Maple Springs;
a new Big Hollow Trail in the hilly country of the park north of the
Green River; the Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail; and the White
Oak Trail.
DATES: The rule is effective October 12, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Kern, Management Assistant,
Mammoth Cave National Park, National Park Service, P.O. Box 7, Mammoth
Cave, Kentucky 42259; phone: (270) 758-2187; email: Ken_Kern@nps.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Mammoth Cave National Park (MACA or park) is the core of the
largest, most complex, and best known karst area in the world. Karst is
a geologic term which refers to areas of irregular limestone in which
erosion has produced features such as fissures, sinkholes, underground
streams, sinking springs, and caverns. The many types of geologic
features present within the extensive cave system are the product of a
unique set of conditions found nowhere else. The 365 miles of
passageways that have been surveyed and mapped define Mammoth Cave as
the longest cave system in the world.
The mission of MACA is to protect and preserve the extensive
limestone caverns and associated karst topography, scenic river-ways,
original forests, other biological resources, and evidence of past and
contemporary ways of life. MACA also strives to educate and enrich the
public through scientific study and to provide for the development and
sustainable use of recreational resources and opportunities within the
park.
Legislation and Purpose of the Park
As early as 1905, Members of the Kentucky Congressional delegation
suggested Mammoth Cave as a national park. In its April 18, 1926,
report to the Secretary of the Interior, the Southern Appalachian
National Park Commission recommended national park status for the
Mammoth Cave region for, among other reasons, the:
beautiful and wonderful formations * * * great underground labyrinth
* * * of remarkable geological and recreational interest perhaps
unparalleled elsewhere * * * [and] thousands of curious sinkholes of
varying sizes through which much of the drainage is carried to
underground streams, there being few surface brooks or creeks * * *
.
The Commission also recommended lands above ground in the region of the
cave for inclusion in the National Park System because of the:
exceptional opportunity for developing a great national recreational
park of outstanding service in the very heart of our Nation's
densest population and at a time when the need is increasingly
urgent and most inadequately provided for.
The United States Congress saw the value of including surface lands as
part of the park. The Senate Committee on Public Lands and Surveys
(Report No. 823, May 10, 1926) and the House of Representatives
Committee on the Public Lands (Report No. 1178, May 12, 1926) said the
park would:
insure a great recreational ground * * * where * * * thousands of
our people may find[hellip]the most delightful outdoor recreation in
* * * traversing the picturesque and rugged hills and valleys and
great forests of the region included in the proposed park area.
On May 25, 1926, Congress authorized the establishment of MACA (44
Stat. 635), and on July 1, 1941, MACA was established as a national
park. Subsequently, the Great Onyx Cave and Crystal Cave properties
were purchased and added to the park on April 7, 1961. The park now
comprises 52,830 acres.
History of Trail Development
Public interest in outdoor recreation at the Mammoth Cave area has
not diminished since the Southern Appalachian National Park Commission
issued its report in 1926. Through the years, park managers have
responded to changing trends in recreation. The Wild Cave tour began in
1969, and a system of backcountry trails was initiated in the 1970s. In
the 1980s, a horse livery on the park boundary began offering guided
rides on park trails and canoe and kayak liveries began shuttle
services on the Green and Nolin rivers. In 2007, the Mammoth Cave
Railroad Bike & Hike Trail was completed, connecting the heart of the
park with one of the gateway communities (two other gateway communities
have expressed interest in constructing similar trails); and the 2007
Comprehensive Trail Management Plan calls for bicycle use on certain
trails in the park.
The park currently has approximately 85 miles of open trail. All
trails are open to hiking, approximately 55 miles of trail are open to
horses, approximately 17 miles of trail are open to bicycles, and
approximately 2.4 miles of trail accommodate both horses and bicycles.
Shortly after the park was designated in 1941, several short trails
were developed in the vicinity of the Mammoth Cave Hotel and Historic
cave entrance. Over the years, these trails were improved and expanded
into a series of loops which compose the first 6.5 miles of the front-
country trail system in the vicinity of the park's visitor center and
nearby Green River. Other trails, including trails at Sloans Pond,
Turnhole Bend, Sand Cave, and Cedar Sink, were developed as short hikes
to park features.
In the early 1970s, the park planned a series of trails in the more
than 20,000 acres north of the Green River. In 1974, those trails were
officially opened to hiking and horseback riding. The main trails of
that 55-mile system followed old and pre-existing dirt roads, with the
remaining trails built as connections between those dirt roads to
create loops.
In 1999, a local biking club asked park management about the
possibility of permitting bicycling on one or more trails in the park.
After consideration by the park, approximately 13 miles of trails were
opened to bicycling on an experimental basis, while continuing to allow
hiking and horseback riding on the same trails.
In February 2005, park officials organized the first Backcountry
Summit meeting between MACA, the Bowling Green League of Bicyclists,
the Sierra Club, and the Mammoth Cave Equestrian Trail Riders
Association. The purpose of this meeting was to provide an avenue of
communication between park officials and all user groups regarding
improving and maintaining backcountry trails and other backcountry
issues.
Comprehensive Trail Management Plan and Environmental Assessment
The park developed a Comprehensive Trail Management Plan (CTMP) and
Environmental Assessment (EA) in 2007 to ensure protection of park
resources and address increasing demand for public use of trails. The
purpose of the CTMP was to develop and implement objectives and
strategies for the protection, management, and use of trails park-wide
for a period of 10 years. The plan identifies designated trails and
access points as well as the type of
[[Page 56119]]
activity (hiking, biking, horseback riding, or a combination of those
activities) for which each trail could be used.
The park staff utilized NPS Management Policies 2006 and the
purposes for which the park was established by Congress to develop
objectives and ensure the appropriateness of designating trails and the
uses allowed for each trail within MACA.
One of the most important concepts incorporated into the CTMP is
sustainability. Under the plan, the park will use sustainable material
and techniques for trail maintenance, future trail design, and
construction projects. The park will use techniques such as maximum
grade limits, water bars, and large dips in the trail called grade
reversals to minimize or slow erosion from water and use. The park will
build bridges and utilize materials such as gravel, landscape timbers,
and geotextile to create a more durable trail surface and protect
potentially vulnerable trail features.
Because the CTMP proposed actions, such as constructing trails and
changing trail alignments, that could have environmental consequences,
NPS was required by the National Environmental Policy Act to evaluate
the potential environmental impacts of those actions. The associated EA
evaluated several alternative proposed actions or variations for a
trail plan, including a ``no action'' alternative that would not change
the way the trails were then managed. The draft plan and accompanying
EA were prepared after a public meeting on June 29, 2006, and after a
public scoping period from June 29, 2006, to July 14, 2006. After the
draft plan and accompanying EA were prepared and published, NPS held a
second public meeting on February 7, 2008, in conjunction with a 60-day
comment period from January 24, 2008, to March 24, 2008.
Selected Alternative
On November 14, 2008, the park selected Alternative 4 described in
the EA. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the selected
alternative was approved on December 17, 2008. The NPS has determined
bicycle use to be appropriate for certain trails in MACA, with the
incorporation of sustainable design, construction, and maintenance
standards and materials. Minimizing trail damage and deterioration and
environmental impacts is an essential element of Alternative 4. Under
Alternative 4, the Big Hollow Trail will be constructed for bicycle use
but will not be open to horses. Bicycle use will be eliminated on the
Sal Hollow, Buffalo, and portions of the Turnhole Bend Trails, which
will revert to hiking and horse use only.
Public comment was overwhelmingly in support of Alternative 4 and
opposed to the park's preferred alternative, Alternative 5. The primary
difference between these two alternatives is that under Alternative 4,
the NPS will construct a new trail primarily for bicycle use whereas
Alternative 5 called for removal of horses from the existing First
Creek Trail in order to allow bicycles on that trail. Creating a new
trail for bicycle use and reverting some trails to hiking and horse use
only will enhance recreational opportunities for a variety of park
users.
The EA is available online at https://www.nps.gov/maca/parkmgmt/planning.htm, and the CTMP and FONSI are available online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectID=17179, then clicking on
the link entitled ``Document List.''
Trails Designated for Bicycle Use
Connector Trail
A new Connector Trail will be designed and constructed for the
purpose of connecting access points and other areas with trails,
including the Maple Springs Group Campground, Maple Springs Trailhead,
Mammoth Cave International Center for Science and Learning, Big Hollow
Trailhead, and the Raymer Hollow Trailhead. This approximately 1.5 mile
Connector Trail will run from the Maple Springs Trailhead to the Raymer
Hollow Trailhead, and will be a wide, hardened-gravel trail to
withstand heavy, two-way traffic of hikers, bicyclists, and horseback
riders. The section of the Connector Trail between Maple Springs
Trailhead and the Big Hollow Trailhead will be designated as multiple-
use, and the section from the Big Hollow Trailhead to the Raymer Hollow
will be restricted to hikers and horses. As part of the Connector Trail
development, the existing parking lot at the Maple Springs Trailhead
will be improved and expanded. This lot will add parking capacity for
the trail system and allow bicyclists, hikers and equestrian access to
the horse and hiking trails or Big Hollow Trail without using park
roads.
When the Connector Trail is complete, the trailhead and trails at
the Good Spring Baptist Church will be eliminated, as access will no
longer be needed to the Raymer Hollow Trail. Elimination of these
trails and the trailhead will greatly reduce the impact on and
degradation of the Good Spring Baptist Church cultural site.
Currently, the only way for equestrians, bicyclists, and hikers to
access trailheads is by using the Maple Springs Loop Road and the Good
Spring Church Road, which can be congested with large pickup trucks,
horse trailers, and other passenger vehicles. Use of these roadways
creates a potential hazard for trail users. The Connector Trail will
provide an alternative to using these roads and increase public safety
by getting these trail users away from the roads and the potential for
collision with vehicles.
Big Hollow Trail
The selected alternative (Alternative 4) includes the development
of the six-mile-long Big Hollow Trail, which will be constructed east
of the Green River Ferry Road-North and on the ridge west of Big
Hollow. Bicycling and hiking will be allowed on the Big Hollow Trail,
but the trail will be closed to horse use. Public comments on the EA
substantially supported construction of this trail for bicycle use.
This new trail increases opportunities for bicycle use without
reducing the number of trails accessible to horse use, while
maintaining separation of horse and bicycle users. Separation of these
activities should improve the recreational experience for user groups
and offer bicyclists access to backcountry scenery.
Since the trail will involve new construction, the selected
alternative will have more impact on park resources than other
alternatives, but we concluded it will not have a significant effect on
the environment. Vegetation will be removed on the trail surface, and
cleared along the trail margins, and sustainable materials and
construction techniques will be used to build the trail, which will
help control and minimize surface degradation, erosion, and other
effects on surrounding park resources. The Big Hollow Trail will not
pass through floodplains, cross streams, or be located near wetlands,
and therefore is expected to have no new impacts on water resources.
Vegetation and tree removal identified in the selected alternative
will be completed in accordance with the ``Biological Opinion for the
Effects of the Hazard Tree Removal and Vegetation Management Program to
the Indiana Bat at Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky'' to ensure the
activities will be considered ``not likely to adversely affect'' the
species.
To minimize any effect on archeological resources, the park has
surveyed areas where ground
[[Page 56120]]
disturbance will take place and adjusted trail alignment to avoid
adverse impacts.
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail
An environmental assessment for the Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike &
Hike Trail was completed in 1999 and amended in 2004. Between 2004 and
2007, the NPS constructed this approximately nine-mile-long, graveled
hiking and biking trail. The Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail
follows the general route of a historic railroad bed leading from the
visitor center to the park boundary at Park City and receives
significant daily use. The trail passes close enough to the campground
area to provide hiking and bicycling opportunities for those camping at
the park. The trail continues past the campground, through valleys and
higher elevations on the ridge-tops, providing the user with a varied
ecological view of the park. Several wayside exhibits along the trail
recount historic facts regarding the old railroad route, including past
events and structures that played a significant role in the history of
the area. The Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail was designed and
constructed utilizing modern technology and sustainable design. The
eight-foot-wide graveled surface was designed to offer a comparatively
easy, family-style bicycle trail as opposed to the single-track,
mountain-biking type of experience.
The Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail will connect to
historic Bell's Tavern upon completion of Park City's bike trail. The
park has received expressions of interest from the communities of Cave
City and Brownsville to construct similar bike trails that could
connect with the Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail. These
improvements would provide opportunities for the use of the park and
contribute to the ``Connecting People to Parks'' initiative of the NPS
and the President's ``America's Great Outdoors'' initiative.
White Oak Trail
The CTMP also identified the 2.4-mile-long White Oak Trail as a
multiple-use trail, and this rule will designate it as a trail for
bicycle use in addition to hiking and horseback riding. The trail is on
an old roadbed and is wide, fairly level, and currently has a
relatively low level of use. The flat and wide nature of the trail
provides conditions that will tend to minimize user conflicts and
support the multiple-use designation. The NPS will continue to
occasionally use the White Oak Trail for administrative vehicle access
to backcountry sites for emergency response and to conduct maintenance
and monitoring activities.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On May 17, 2011, NPS published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for
the designation of bicycle trails at MACA (76 FR 28388). The proposed
rule for bicycle use was based upon the selected action (Alternative 4)
described in the EA and FONSI. The proposed rule was available for
public comment from May 17, 2011, through July 18, 2011.
Summary of and Responses to Public Comments
Comments were accepted through the mail, hand delivery, and through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. A total of
21 public comment documents were received during the comment period,
two from organizations and the rest from individuals. A summary of
comments and NPS responses is provided below.
1. Comment: The White Oak Trail needs to remain open to horses in
the future.
Response: Under the final rule, the NPS will not close the White
Oak Trail to equestrians. The White Oak Trail will be a multiple/shared
use trail for all backcountry users.
2. Comment: Shared use of the White Oak Trail is acceptable due to
the low level of trail use. It has been proven that bicyclists can
successfully share trails with hikers.
Response: The White Oak Trail consists of an administrative road
that has a wide, relatively level surface and that receives
comparatively little traffic by any users and therefore was determined
appropriate for shared use by hikers, bikers, and equestrians.
3. Comment: There is no need to open up any new trails in the
park's backcountry area north of the river or to allow bicycles on the
Big Hollow Trail since there are ample recreation opportunities for
families and visitors in the park and for bicyclists to ride.
Response: The NPS does not agree with this comment, but does
recognize that individuals have a variety of opinions regarding the
management and regulation of activities within units of the National
Park System. The park undertook a diligent planning process involving
the park's trail user groups and stakeholders, obtaining their input in
developing the CTMP and the alternatives described in the CTMP. The
CTMP identified management objectives and strategies to guide the
protection, management, maintenance, and use of the trails in the park,
including the development of new trails such as the Big Hollow Trail.
The CTMP identified appropriate types of trail use and determined that
bicycle use on designated trails is appropriate. The public interest in
this planning process was high, and public input was considered and
incorporated into the plan as part of the decision-making process.
4. Comment: The park needs to rehabilitate and maintain the
existing trails before building any new trails. The money spent on new
trails would be better spent maintaining the established trails.
Response: To improve trail conditions, the park is implementing
other elements of the CTMP that address trail maintenance and
sustainability. The park believes it can accomplish these goals
concurrently with building the new Big Hollow Trail and Connector
Trail.
5. Comment: Mountain bicycling is an activity that is in keeping
with the mission of the NPS.
Response: The NPS has a goal of providing high quality bicycling
opportunities for visitors in appropriate areas and in a manner
consistent with our stewardship responsibilities. The NPS is committed
to identifying and providing opportunities for the public to
participate in outdoor recreation to promote health and wellness. NPS
Director Jonathan Jarvis unveiled the ``Healthy Parks Healthy People
US'' initiative to highlight the unique role that our nation's national
parks play in promoting health and wellness through outdoor recreation
activities such as bicycling. The President introduced the ``America's
Great Outdoors'' initiative to reconnect people to the outdoors and
promote activities that enhance health and wellness. A key goal of this
initiative for federal agencies is to increase and improve recreational
access and opportunities. During the CTMP planning process, the park
received 2,905 public comments on the plan and only one of those
comments stated a concern that the use of mountain bikes on trails in
MACA was inconsistent with the mission of the NPS.
6. Comment: Significant health benefits can be derived from
bicycling and trail users at the park would benefit from enhanced
outdoor recreational opportunities and access. Bicycling is a low
impact, healthy, safe activity which should be encouraged in our parks.
Biking fights obesity and nature deficit disorder, providing additional
opportunities to exercise and better quality of life. The First Lady's
``Let's
[[Page 56121]]
Move!'' campaign specifically addresses these problems and biking is a
significant part of the solution. Bicycle routes create another method
of exercise and opportunity to enjoy the park, create high quality
recreational experiences, and add significant value to park resources.
Providing biking opportunities will make the Mammoth Cave area more
attractive to people who appreciate active types of recreation. Adding
mountain bicycling to trails at MACA is the type of action contemplated
by the President's ``America's Great Outdoors'' initiative to connect
Americans to their natural surroundings through outdoor recreation.
Response: The NPS is engaged in a wide-ranging effort to bring the
outdoors into the public discussion about public health and to expand
opportunities for people seeking a more active lifestyle. As part of
this effort, NPS Director Jarvis initiated the ``Healthy Parks Healthy
People U.S.'' program to highlight the unique role that our nation's
national parks play in promoting health and wellness. Studies have
shown being in the outdoors and participating in outdoor activities can
reduce stress and anxiety, foster mental and physical health, and
promote learning and personal growth. The health benefits derived from
outdoor physical activities such as bicycling are well documented.
Recently, the media has reported that doctors have been writing ``Park
Prescriptions'' which prescribe park visits to get patients outside to
exercise and receive the benefits of sun and fresh air. Implementing
the final rule will increase and improve recreational opportunities for
all trail users and high quality backcountry experiences. Equestrians
have access to the Sal Hollow Trail as they requested. Hikers will have
access to a backcountry trail which is free of horse impacts and
manure. Bicyclists will be able to enjoy the Big Hollow Trail, the
White Oak Trail, the Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail, and the
Connector Trail. Providing these recreational opportunities to the
public will directly support the First Lady's ``Let's Move'' campaign
to specifically address the public health crisis of obesity.
7. Comment: Mountain biking has been managed successfully at other
NPS units with minimal environmental impact. Other land managing
agencies have found ways to manage mountain bicycling on their lands.
Response: Several NPS units offer biking on single track trails,
and many more allow riding on unpaved or dirt roads, providing numerous
examples of successful, well-planned cycling venues in the National
Park System. Scientific studies have shown that the environmental
impacts of mountain biking are similar to those of hiking and less than
those of other uses. Under the final rule, NPS will manage appropriate
use of bicycles on identified trails in accordance with applicable
laws, regulations, and policies. Such management will assure protection
of the park's natural, cultural, scenic, wildlife, and aesthetic values
while promoting visitor connections with the park, increasing
appreciation of park resources, and providing healthy outdoor
recreation opportunities.
8. Comment: Local bicycle clubs and cyclists provide volunteer
support to the park, making an important contribution to maintaining
park trails. Local bicycling groups have adopted trails they ride
providing volunteer backcountry patrols and maintenance to ensure the
trails are environmentally sustainable. Members of the biking community
have demonstrated their commitment to preserving and maintaining the
resources at MACA. The Sal Hollow Trail is currently the best trail in
the park because the local bicycle clubs and cyclists have volunteered
over 200 hours of trail maintenance work per year for several years to
keep the trail in this condition. Volunteer trail work provides service
opportunities for people interested in helping maintain and create
sustainable trails.
Response: Local bicycling organizations have been participating in
volunteer trail projects at the park for many years, thereby
demonstrating their commitment to trail stewardship. The conditions of
the trails they have been working on are among the best in the park.
Park management will continue to work with the Mammoth Cave Backcountry
Summit Council as an umbrella organization to coordinate and promote
trail-related volunteer activities. Encouraging and supporting
continued volunteer participation in trail maintenance activities by
all user groups is a key management objective that is vital to
establishing sustainable trails and protecting park resources.
9. Comment: The CTMP for the park should be fully implemented, as
it was developed through sound procedures analyzing a variety of
alternatives and included a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of
allowing bicycles on the identified trails and examined the potential
long term, short term and cumulative impacts of its implementation,
following both the letter and spirit of the law. The proposed rule is
in keeping with the decisions reached through the CTMP process. The
plan was developed with significant public input drawing on the
expertise and desire of a wide array of trail users. The CTMP is
environmentally and socially responsible. The plan reflects careful
attention to preservation of the park's historical and natural
resources. The park solicited public comment on the options before
deciding which option would be best for the park and all user groups.
During the CTMP process, the park received only two substantive
comments indicating any negative perceptions regarding biking at MACA.
Those arguments were founded on the lack of a special regulation, not
on the use of bicycles on trails. The exceptionally low comment total
and lack of opposition to the actual bicycle use indicates that the
substance of the CTMP is relatively non-controversial, requiring only
this final procedure to garner broad community support.
Response: The park undertook a diligent planning process involving
the park's trail user groups and stakeholders, obtaining their input in
developing the CTMP and its alternatives. The plan identified
management objectives and strategies to guide the protection,
management, maintenance, and use of the trails in the park, including
the development of new trails such as the Big Hollow Trail. This plan
identified appropriate types of trail use and included the
determination that bicycle use on designated trails is appropriate.
During civic engagement, the public interest in this planning process
was high, and the public's input was considered and incorporated into
the plan as part of the decision making process. This has resulted in
broad local support for the CTMP. The CTMP, along with the accompanying
EA and FONSI, were completed and approved in December 2008. Completion
of this rule-making process will address the concerns that the park
does not have a special regulation designating the trails outside of
developed areas that were selected in the CTMP for bicycle use.
10. Comment: The Organic Act directs the NPS to provide for
``enjoyment'' of the scenery, wildlife and natural and historic objects
conserved by the NPS. The NPS Organic Act does not authorize any and
all forms of outdoor recreation under the rubric of ``enjoyment.''
Mountain bicycling on single-track trails in park backcountry is a
highly suspect form of ``enjoyment'' which may not be consistent with
the purpose of national parks and of MACA.
Response: The park completed the CTMP, EA, and FONSI in 2008. The
CTMP and EA were published for a 60-day review and comment period.
During
[[Page 56122]]
this civic engagement, the public interest in this planning process was
high. The park received 2,905 public comments on the plan and only one
of those comments stated a concern that the use of bikes on backcountry
trails in MACA was inconsistent with the mission of the NPS. Through
the park's planning and monitoring efforts, coupled with the input
received from the public, the park determined that bicycling
(recreational and mountain biking) is an appropriate use on certain
park trails. This final rule specifically designates which trails in
the park are open to bicycle use. Big Hollow Trail will be the only
single-track trail open to bicycle use in the park. The limitations on
bicycle use in 36 CFR 4.30 and this rule allow NPS to manage
appropriate use of bicycles on the trails in accordance with applicable
laws, regulations, and policies to ensure that the park is protecting
natural, cultural, scenic, and wildlife resources while also preserving
the aesthetic values of a backcountry experience for all users. The NPS
has determined that implementing this special rule at MACA does not
constitute a violation of the Organic Act or MACA's enabling
legislation.
11. Comment: The NPS has decided to construct a mountain bicycle
trail in a roadless and undeveloped area of MACA and the unprecedented
nature of that decision has created an impact of great significance for
the National Park System and the park. This is the first time that the
NPS has undertaken construction of a mountain bike trail in any area of
the National Park System.
Response: The Big Hollow Trail will be located in the area north of
the Green River and east of the Green River Ferry Road. This area is
not roadless and undeveloped, but rather contains many signs of past
human use of the land, including sunken wagon and road traces, fence
lines, power line corridors, old fields, reforestation plots, gullies
and erosion control check dams, wells, chimneys, and building
foundations. The Big Hollow Trail is not exclusively a mountain bike
trail. It will be a shared use trail designated for use by hikers and
bikers. This trail was designed and will be constructed to sustainable
standards to support these uses. The park will be managing the
appropriate use of bicycles on the designated trails, including the Big
Hollow Trail, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and
policies to assure the protection of the park's natural, cultural,
scenic, wildlife, and aesthetic values. This trail is not the first
mountain bike trail constructed in a park area of the National Park
System. Currently, there are several NPS units that have constructed
mountain bike trails for riding and many more which allow mountain bike
riding on unpaved roads. These trails are excellent examples of
providing new opportunities for enjoying park areas in the National
Park System. Some of these NPS units have constructed trails with
bicycling and hiking as the primary intended uses. Several park units
have completed a public process establishing special regulations which
designated specific trails as open for bicycle use. Additional park
units are currently working through the special regulation process to
designate specific trails outside of developed areas for bicycle use.
The requirements of 36 CFR 4.30 will still apply to any NPS unit which
proposes to designate specific trails outside of developed areas for
bicycle use.
12. Comment: This rulemaking would establish bicycle use within a
natural area that was previously studied for wilderness suitability in
the park's Wilderness Study of 1974. The NPS should reassess the
roadless tracts of MACA for suitability as wilderness. The special
regulation would establish a use which would be required to be
displaced (since bicycles are banned in wilderness) should Congress
ever designate wilderness in this area.
Response: The final rule is consistent with the requirements of the
Wilderness Act. A Wilderness Study of the park was completed and a
recommendation made that no lands in MACA be added to the National
Wilderness Preservation System. There is no statutory requirement that
the park reassess the roadless tracts for suitability as wilderness.
Although more than 70 years have passed since the establishment of the
park, the NPS continues to believe that the area is not suitable for
wilderness because numerous signs of past human use of the land (e.g.,
sunken wagon/road traces, fence lines, power line corridors, old
fields, reforestation plots, gullies and erosion control check dams,
wells, chimneys, and building foundations) are still apparent in the
area where trail development will occur.
13. Comment: The Big Hollow Trail would be an asset to the park as
well as the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Big Hollow Trail would be a great
use of this public land. Big Hollow Trail is definitely a great idea to
bring more international attention to the area and to highlight a piece
of natural beauty that our country has to offer.
Response: We agree that providing these recreational opportunities
to the public will broaden the park's appeal with visitors looking for
outdoor recreation activities and high quality backcountry experiences.
Changes from the Proposed Rule
Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the proposed rule has been deleted because
it is duplicative with 36 CFR 4.30(d)(2). Paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of the
proposed rule (now paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the final rule) has been
revised to make the speed limit 15 miles per hour or as posted in the
park. This gives MACA the flexibility to adjust the speed limit to
address visitor safety, health, or resource management concerns.
Paragraph (c)(3) has been revised to grant the Superintendent of MACA
the authority to open or close designated bicycle routes, or to impose
conditions or restrictions for bicycle use after taking into
consideration public health and safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management activities and objectives. This
authority may be exercised independent of the Superintendent's
authority under 36 CFR 1.5 and will provide the park with greater
flexibility to respond to the impacts of bicycle use on designated
routes. Public notice of any action taken under paragraph (c)(3)(i)
must be given pursuant to one or more of the methods set forth in 36
CFR 1.7. Paragraph (c)(3)(ii) was added to clarify that violating a
closure, condition, or restriction established by the Superintendent
under paragraph (c)(3) is prohibited. After consideration of the public
comments, the park has decided that no other changes are necessary to
the proposed rule.
Compliance With Other Laws and Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
[[Page 56123]]
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). This conclusion is based on the results of an NPS economic
analysis of the effects of the rule, dated November 17, 2009, available
for review at: https://www.nps.gov/maca/parkmgmt/planning.htm, which
incorporated a regulatory flexibility threshold analysis. The rule will
reasonably increase park visitation and thereby generate benefits for
businesses, including small entities, through increased visitor
spending.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. There are no businesses in the surrounding area economically
dependent on continued bicycle use on these trails. The November 2009
NPS economic analysis estimated that the rule will add a benefit to
local business in the form of new visitors attracted to the area to use
the trails.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. The rule will not impose restrictions
on local businesses in the form of fees, training, record keeping, or
other measures that would increase costs. The economic analysis
projected a net benefit for the Federal government and a consumer
surplus of $24.02/day for new visitors and $12.01/day for current
visitors.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign based enterprises. The
rule is internal to NPS operations.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. This rulemaking
addresses only actions that will be taken by the NPS. It will not
require any State, local or tribal government to take any action that
is not funded. It is an NPS-specific rule and imposes no requirements
on small governments. A statement containing the information required
by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of Executive Order 12630, this rule
does not have significant takings implications. This rule designates
park trails inside the park, and though the trails may connect with
trails external to the park, the rule does not require the taking of
private land outside the park. A takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This rule only
effects use of NPS administered lands. It has no effect on other areas.
A Federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not
required. The question was considered as part of the EA, and trails
were configured to avoid areas identified as archeological sites,
specifically any with known burials. In addition to the EA, past
consultation with the tribes has been important in the identification
of concerns or issues of cultural interest.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission under the PRA is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
We have prepared environmental assessments to determine whether
this rule would have a significant impact on the quality of the human
environment under the NEPA. This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment. A detailed statement under the NEPA is not required
because we reached a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the
Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail and also for the other
designated bicycle routes. The environmental assessment and FONSI for
the Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail and the EA for the
Comprehensive Trail Management Plan (CTMP) may be reviewed at https://www.nps.gov/maca/parkmgmt/planning.htm. The FONSI for the CTMP may be
reviewed at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectID=17179, and then clicking on the link entitled
``Document List.''
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Park Service
amends 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for Part 7 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued
under 36 U.S.C. 501-511, DC Code 10-137 (2001) and DC Code 50-
2201.07 (2001).
0
2. In Sec. 7.36 add paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.36 Mammoth Cave National Park.
* * * * *
(c) Bicycles. (1) The following trails are designated as routes
open to bicycle use:
[[Page 56124]]
(i) Connector Trail from the Big Hollow Trailhead to the Maple
Springs Trailhead;
(ii) Big Hollow Trail;
(iii) Mammoth Cave Railroad Bike & Hike Trail; and
(iv) White Oak Trail.
(2) The following are prohibited:
(i) Possessing a bicycle on routes or trails not designated as open
to bicycle use;
(ii) Unless posted otherwise, operating a bicycle in excess of 15
miles per hour on designated routes; and
(iii) Failing to yield the right of way to horses or hikers.
(3) The Superintendent may open or close designated bicycle routes,
or portions thereof, or impose conditions or restrictions for bicycle
use after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural
and cultural resource protection, and other management activities and
objectives.
(i) The Superintendent will provide public notice of all such
actions through one or more of the methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this
chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or restriction is prohibited.
Dated: August 30, 2012.
Rachael Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012-22438 Filed 9-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-T3-P