Special Local Regulation; Partnership in Education, Dragon Boat Race; Maumee River, Toledo, OH, 55436-55439 [2012-22153]
Download as PDF
55436
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 175 / Monday, September 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0714]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Partnership
in Education, Dragon Boat Race;
Maumee River, Toledo, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a permanent Special Local
Regulation on the Maumee River,
Toledo, Ohio. This regulation is
intended to regulate vessel movement in
portions of the Maumee River during
the annual Dragon Boat Races. This
special local regulated area is necessary
to protect race participants from other
vessel traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before October 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0714 using any one of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 202–493–2251.
Mail or Delivery: Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Deliveries accepted between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LTJG Benjamin
Nessia, Response Department, MSU
Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone (419)
418–6040, email
Benjamin.B.Nessia@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Sep 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when the comment is successfully
transmitted; a comment submitted via
fax, hand delivery, or mail, will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when the comment is
received at the Docket Management
Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit
a Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8c by 11
inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing comments and documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘OPEN
DOCKET FOLDER’’ on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On May 11, 2011, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Special
Local Regulation; Partnership in
Education Dragon Boat Race, Maumee
River Toledo, OH in the Federal
Register (Docket Number USCG–2011–
0211, 76 FR 27284). No public
comments were received; a public
meeting was not requested, and no
public meetings were held. However,
the Coast Guard elected not to publish
a final rule (FR) following that 2011
NPRM. Given the length of time since
the 2011 NPRM comment period ended,
the Coast Guard has decided to again
solicit public comments for this annual
event. In addition to the 2011 NPRM,
the Coast Guard established a temporary
final rule (TFR) earlier this year to
establish Special Local Regulations for
the 2012 occurrence of this event (full
text not published in the Federal
Register). Because of the application
submission by the sponsoring
organization was delayed in 2012, the
Coast Guard used the ‘‘Good Cause’’
exception to the Notice & Comment
requirement of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
C. Basis and Purpose
Each year, an organized racing event
takes place on the Maumee River in
which participants paddle Hong Kong
E:\FR\FM\10SEP1.SGM
10SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 175 / Monday, September 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
style Dragon Boats from International
Park to Owens Corning on the Maumee
River in Toledo, OH. This recurring
event is known as the Dragon Boat
races. The Captain of the Port Detroit
has determined that this dragon boat
race in close proximity to other
watercraft and in the shipping channel
poses a significant risk to public safety
and property. Thus, the Captain of the
Port Detroit has determined it necessary
to establish a permanent Special Local
Regulation around the location of the
race’s course to ensure the safety of
persons and property at this annual
event and help minimize the associated
risks.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
As suggested above, this proposed
rule is intended to ensure safety of the
public and vessels during the Dragon
Boat Races. This proposed rule will
become effective 30 days after the final
rule is published in the Federal
Register. However, the Special Local
Regulation will only be enforced
annually on the third or fourth Saturday
in July from 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.
Vessel traffic may proceed down the
West side of the river at a no wake
speed during racing. The races will stop
for oncoming freighter or commercial
traffic. The on-scene representative may
be present on any Coast Guard, state or
local law enforcement, or sponsor
provided vessel assigned to patrol the
event. The on-scene representatives may
permit vessels to transit the area when
no race activity is occurring. Coast
Guard proposes that all vessels
transiting the area shall proceed at a nowake speed and maintain extra
vigilance at all times.
This Special Local Regulation will
encompass all navigable waters of the
United States on the Maumee River,
Toledo, OH, bound by a line extending
from a point on land just north of the
Cherry Street Bridge at position
41°39′5.27″ N; 083°31′34.01″ W straight
across the river along the Cherry Street
bridge to position 41°39′12.83″ N;
083°31′42.58″ W and a line extending
from a point of land just south of
International Park at position 41°38′
46.62″ N; 083°31′50.54″ W straight
across the river to the shore adjacent to
the Owens Corning building at position
41°38′47.37″ N; 083°32′2.05″ W. These
coordinates are North American Datum
of 1983 (NAD 83).
The Captain of the Port will notify the
affected segments of the public of the
enforcement of this Special Local
Regulation by all appropriate means.
Means of notification may include
publication of Notice of Enforcement
(NOE) in the Federal Register,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Sep 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Local
Notice to Mariners.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The Special Local Regulation will be
relatively small and be enforced for a
relatively short time. Thus, restrictions
on vessel movement within that
particular area are expected to be
minimal. Under certain conditions,
moreover, vessels may still transit
through the area when permitted by the
Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule will affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the portion of the Maumee
River discussed above annually on the
third or fourth Saturday of July from
6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.
This proposed Special Local
Regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55437
number of small entities for the
following reasons: This rule will be
enforced for approximately twelve
hours the day of its effective period. In
addition, on-scene representatives will
allow vessels to transit along the
Western side of the river at a slow no
wake speed. The race committee will
stop the races for any oncoming
commercial traffic.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking
process. If this proposed rule would
affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance,
please contact LTJG Benjamin Nessia,
Response Department, MSU Toledo,
Coast Guard; telephone (419) 418–6040,
email Benjamin.B.Nessia@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
E:\FR\FM\10SEP1.SGM
10SEP1
55438
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 175 / Monday, September 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule will meet
applicable standards in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and
reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Sep 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a
Special Local Regulation and is
therefore categorically excluded under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction. During the annual
permitting process for this Dragon Boat
Race event an environmental analysis
will be conducted, and thus, no
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist or Categorical Exclusion
Determination (CED) will be required
for this rulemaking action. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine Safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Waterways.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add § 100.921 to read as follows:
§ 100.921 Special Local Regulations,
Partnership in Education, Dragon Boat
Festival, Toledo, OH.
(a) Regulated Area. The regulated area
includes all U.S. navigable waters of the
Maumee river, Toledo, OH, bound by a
line extending from a point on land just
north of the Cherry Street Bridge at
position 41°39′5.27″ N; 083°31′34.01″ W
straight across the river along the Cherry
Street bridge to position 41°39′12.83″ N;
083°31′42.58″ W and a line extending
from a point of land just south of
International Park at position
41°38′46.62″ N; 083°31′50.54″ W
straight across the river to the shore
adjacent to the Owens Corning building
at position
41°38′47.37″ N; 083°32′2.05″ W. These
coordinates are North American Datum
of 1983 (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Enforcement Period. These Special
Local Regulations will be enforced
annually on the third or fourth Saturday
of July from 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.
The exact dates and times will be
determined annually and published
annually in the Federal Register via a
Notice of Enforcement.
(c) Special Local Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in section § 100.901 of this
part, vessels transiting within the
regulated area shall travel at a no-wake
speed and remain vigilant for vessels
participating in the event. Additionally,
vessels shall yield right-of-way for event
participants and event safety craft and
shall follow directions given by the
Coast Guard’s on-scene representative or
by event representatives during the
event.
(2) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Sector Detroit is
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Detroit to act on his behalf. The
on-scene representative of the Captain
of the Port, Sector Detroit will be aboard
either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the
Port, Sector Detroit or his designated on
scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP1.SGM
10SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 175 / Monday, September 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Dated: August 6, 2012.
J.E. Ogden,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Detroit.
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
[FR Doc. 2012–22153 Filed 9–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 161
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1024]
RIN 1625–AB81
Vessel Traffic Service Updates,
Including Establishment of Vessel
Traffic Service Requirements for Port
Arthur, TX and Expansion of VTS
Special Operating Area in Puget Sound
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
revise and update the Vessel Traffic
Service (VTS) regulations in 33 CFR part
161. The revision would require
participation in the VTS in Port Arthur,
Texas, which is now voluntary;
consolidate and expand a VTS Special
Area in Puget Sound, Washington;
update the designated frequencies for
the Maritime Mobile Service Identifiers
(MMSI) for Louisville and Los Angeles/
Long Beach; and update the definitions
and references in Sailing Plan
requirements. The changes made by this
proposed rule are intended to align
regulations with the current operating
procedures of the VTSs affected, with
the benefit of creating regulatory
efficiency.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before December 10, 2012 or reach
the Docket Management Facility by that
date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–1024 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Sep 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Lieutenant
Commander Patricia Springer, Office of
Shore Forces (CG–7413), Coast Guard;
telephone 202–372–2576, email
Patricia.J.Springer@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coast Guard
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Public Meeting
II. Abbreviations
III. Background
IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule
A. § 161.12 Vessel Operating
Requirements
B. § 161.19 Sailing Plan
C. § 161.55 Vessel Traffic Service Puget
Sound and the Cooperative Vessel
Traffic Service for the Juan de Fuca
Region
D. § 161.70 Vessel Traffic Service Port
Arthur
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.
regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have
provided.
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–1024),
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55439
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1024’’ in the ‘‘Search’’
box. Click on ‘‘Submit a comment’’ in
the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you submit
your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope.
We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment
period and may change this proposed
rule based on your comments.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, insert
‘‘USCG–2011–1024’’ and click
‘‘Search.’’ Click the ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you
do not have access to the Internet, you
may view the docket by visiting the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
D. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the docket using one of the
E:\FR\FM\10SEP1.SGM
10SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 175 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55436-55439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22153]
[[Page 55436]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0714]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Partnership in Education, Dragon Boat
Race; Maumee River, Toledo, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a permanent Special
Local Regulation on the Maumee River, Toledo, Ohio. This regulation is
intended to regulate vessel movement in portions of the Maumee River
during the annual Dragon Boat Races. This special local regulated area
is necessary to protect race participants from other vessel traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before October 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0714 using any one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LTJG Benjamin Nessia, Response Department, MSU
Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone (419) 418-6040, email
Benjamin.B.Nessia@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online (via
https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard
when the comment is successfully transmitted; a comment submitted via
fax, hand delivery, or mail, will be considered as having been received
by the Coast Guard when the comment is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing comments and documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``OPEN DOCKET FOLDER'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On May 11, 2011, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Special Local Regulation; Partnership in
Education Dragon Boat Race, Maumee River Toledo, OH in the Federal
Register (Docket Number USCG-2011-0211, 76 FR 27284). No public
comments were received; a public meeting was not requested, and no
public meetings were held. However, the Coast Guard elected not to
publish a final rule (FR) following that 2011 NPRM. Given the length of
time since the 2011 NPRM comment period ended, the Coast Guard has
decided to again solicit public comments for this annual event. In
addition to the 2011 NPRM, the Coast Guard established a temporary
final rule (TFR) earlier this year to establish Special Local
Regulations for the 2012 occurrence of this event (full text not
published in the Federal Register). Because of the application
submission by the sponsoring organization was delayed in 2012, the
Coast Guard used the ``Good Cause'' exception to the Notice & Comment
requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act.
C. Basis and Purpose
Each year, an organized racing event takes place on the Maumee
River in which participants paddle Hong Kong
[[Page 55437]]
style Dragon Boats from International Park to Owens Corning on the
Maumee River in Toledo, OH. This recurring event is known as the Dragon
Boat races. The Captain of the Port Detroit has determined that this
dragon boat race in close proximity to other watercraft and in the
shipping channel poses a significant risk to public safety and
property. Thus, the Captain of the Port Detroit has determined it
necessary to establish a permanent Special Local Regulation around the
location of the race's course to ensure the safety of persons and
property at this annual event and help minimize the associated risks.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
As suggested above, this proposed rule is intended to ensure safety
of the public and vessels during the Dragon Boat Races. This proposed
rule will become effective 30 days after the final rule is published in
the Federal Register. However, the Special Local Regulation will only
be enforced annually on the third or fourth Saturday in July from 6:00
a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Vessel traffic may proceed down the West side of
the river at a no wake speed during racing. The races will stop for
oncoming freighter or commercial traffic. The on-scene representative
may be present on any Coast Guard, state or local law enforcement, or
sponsor provided vessel assigned to patrol the event. The on-scene
representatives may permit vessels to transit the area when no race
activity is occurring. Coast Guard proposes that all vessels transiting
the area shall proceed at a no-wake speed and maintain extra vigilance
at all times.
This Special Local Regulation will encompass all navigable waters
of the United States on the Maumee River, Toledo, OH, bound by a line
extending from a point on land just north of the Cherry Street Bridge
at position 41[deg]39'5.27'' N; 083[deg]31'34.01'' W straight across
the river along the Cherry Street bridge to position 41[deg]39'12.83''
N; 083[deg]31'42.58'' W and a line extending from a point of land just
south of International Park at position 41[deg]38' 46.62'' N;
083[deg]31'50.54'' W straight across the river to the shore adjacent to
the Owens Corning building at position 41[deg]38'47.37'' N;
083[deg]32'2.05'' W. These coordinates are North American Datum of 1983
(NAD 83).
The Captain of the Port will notify the affected segments of the
public of the enforcement of this Special Local Regulation by all
appropriate means. Means of notification may include publication of
Notice of Enforcement (NOE) in the Federal Register, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners, and Local Notice to Mariners.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies,
will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The Special Local
Regulation will be relatively small and be enforced for a relatively
short time. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that
particular area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions,
moreover, vessels may still transit through the area when permitted by
the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the portion of
the Maumee River discussed above annually on the third or fourth
Saturday of July from 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.
This proposed Special Local Regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons: This rule will be enforced for approximately twelve
hours the day of its effective period. In addition, on-scene
representatives will allow vessels to transit along the Western side of
the river at a slow no wake speed. The race committee will stop the
races for any oncoming commercial traffic.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
If this proposed rule would affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact LTJG Benjamin
Nessia, Response Department, MSU Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone (419)
418-6040, email Benjamin.B.Nessia@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without
[[Page 55438]]
jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule will meet applicable standards in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of a Special Local Regulation and is therefore
categorically excluded under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction. During the annual permitting process for this Dragon Boat
Race event an environmental analysis will be conducted, and thus, no
preliminary environmental analysis checklist or Categorical Exclusion
Determination (CED) will be required for this rulemaking action. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add Sec. 100.921 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.921 Special Local Regulations, Partnership in Education,
Dragon Boat Festival, Toledo, OH.
(a) Regulated Area. The regulated area includes all U.S. navigable
waters of the Maumee river, Toledo, OH, bound by a line extending from
a point on land just north of the Cherry Street Bridge at position
41[deg]39'5.27'' N; 083[deg]31'34.01'' W straight across the river
along the Cherry Street bridge to position 41[deg]39'12.83'' N;
083[deg]31'42.58'' W and a line extending from a point of land just
south of International Park at position 41[deg]38'46.62'' N;
083[deg]31'50.54'' W straight across the river to the shore adjacent to
the Owens Corning building at position 41[deg]38'47.37'' N;
083[deg]32'2.05'' W. These coordinates are North American Datum of 1983
(DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Enforcement Period. These Special Local Regulations will be
enforced annually on the third or fourth Saturday of July from 6:00
a.m. until 6:00 p.m. The exact dates and times will be determined
annually and published annually in the Federal Register via a Notice of
Enforcement.
(c) Special Local Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in section Sec.
100.901 of this part, vessels transiting within the regulated area
shall travel at a no-wake speed and remain vigilant for vessels
participating in the event. Additionally, vessels shall yield right-of-
way for event participants and event safety craft and shall follow
directions given by the Coast Guard's on-scene representative or by
event representatives during the event.
(2) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Detroit is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Detroit to act on his behalf. The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port, Sector Detroit will be aboard either a Coast Guard
or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port, Sector
Detroit or his designated on scene representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
[[Page 55439]]
Dated: August 6, 2012.
J.E. Ogden,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2012-22153 Filed 9-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P