Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 55499-55500 [2012-22121]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 175 / Monday, September 10, 2012 / Notices
Issued: September 5, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–22172 Filed 9–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–798]
Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and
Products Containing Same;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation in Its
Entirety on the Basis of a Settlement
Agreement
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 38) granting the joint
motion to terminate the above-captioned
investigation in its entirety on the basis
of a settlement agreement. In view of
that determination, the Commission
finds that review of another ID (Order
No. 36), which granted leave to amend
the complaint and notice of
investigation, is moot.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on August 18, 2011, based on a
complaint filed by Samsung LED Co.,
Ltd. of Suwon City, Korea, and Samsung
LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Sep 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
(collectively, ‘‘SLED’’). 76 FR 51396–97
(Aug. 18, 2011). The complaint alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain light-emitting
diodes and products containing same by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,282,741; 7,893,443;
7,838,315; 7,959,312; 7,964,881;
6,551,848; 7,268,372; and 7,771,081.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
OSRAM GmbH of Munich, Germany;
OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH of
Regensburg, Germany; OSRAM Opto
Semiconductors Inc. of Sunnyvale,
California; and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. of
Danvers, Massachusetts (collectively,
‘‘OSRAM’’). On December 7, 2011, the
Commission determined not to review
an ID (Order No. 15) granting SLED’s
motion to amend the Notice of
Investigation to change the name of
respondent OSRAM GmbH to OSRAM
AG. Notice (Dec. 7, 2011).
On July 26, 2012, SLED filed a motion
to amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation to substitute Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon City,
Korea (‘‘Samsung Electronics’’), for the
SLED complainants, as a result of
corporate reorganization. On July 30,
2012, OSRAM filed an opposition, and
on August 7, 2012, the ALJ issued an ID
granting the motion as an ID. Order No.
36.
On August 9, 2012, SLED and
OSRAM filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation in its
entirety based on a settlement
agreement between OSRAM and
Samsung Electronics. On August 10,
2012, the ALJ granted the motion as an
ID. Order No. 38.
No petitions for review of either ID
were filed. The Commission has
determined not to review Order No. 38,
and the investigation is thereby
terminated. As a result, review of Order
No. 36 is moot.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.21 and 210.42 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 5, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–22171 Filed 9–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55499
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
September 4, 2012, a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. State of Utah,
School and Institutional Trust Lands
Administration, Civil Action No. 2:12–
CV–00841–DBP, was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
District of Utah.
The Consent Decree resolves claims
by the United States against the State of
Utah, School and Institutional Trust
Lands Administration (‘‘SITLA’’)
pursuant to Section 107(a) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), for
response costs incurred in conducting a
removal action at the Cook Slurry Site
(‘‘Site’’) in Saratoga Springs, Utah (the
‘‘Removal Action’’). Cook Associates
Inc., doing business as Cook Slurry
Company (‘‘Cook’’), operated an
explosives manufacturing facility at the
Site on school trust lands owned by the
State of Utah which predecessor
agencies to SITLA had leased to Cook.
Under the terms of the settlement SITLA
will reimburse the United States
$316,500 of the costs of completing the
Removal Action.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty (30) days
from the date of this publication,
comments relating to the proposed
settlement agreement. Comments should
be addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General for the Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and either
emailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611, and
should refer to United States v. State of
Utah, School and Institutional Trust
Lands Administration, Civil Action No.
2:12–CV–00841–DBP, and D.J. Ref. No.
90–11–3–10515.
During the public comment period,
the settlement agreement may be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
settlement agreement may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or emailing a
request to ‘‘Consent Decree Copy’’
(EESCDCopy.enrd@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–5271. If requesting a
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
55500
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 175 / Monday, September 10, 2012 / Notices
copy from the Consent Decree Library
by mail, please enclose a check in the
amount of $3.75 ($.25 per page) payable
to the U.S. Treasury or, if by email or
fax, forward a check in that amount to
the Consent Decree Library at the
address given above.
Robert Brook,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–22121 Filed 9–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–363]
Controlled Substances: Final Adjusted
Aggregate Production Quotas for 2012
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice establishes final
adjusted 2012 aggregate production
quotas for controlled substances in
Schedules I and II of the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
W. Partridge, Chief, Liaison and Policy
Section, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152, Telephone: (202)
307–4654.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 306(a) of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
826) requires that the Attorney General
establish aggregate production quotas
for each basic class of controlled
substance listed in Schedules I and II.
This responsibility has been delegated
to the Administrator of the DEA by 28
CFR 0.100. In accordance with 21 U.S.C.
826 and 21 CFR 1303.11, DEA
published in the Federal Register on
December 15, 2011, notice of the
established 2012 aggregate production
quotas for controlled substances in
Schedules I and II (76 FR 78044). That
notice stated that the Administrator
would adjust, as needed, the established
aggregate production quotas in 2012 as
provided for in 21 CFR 1303.13. The
2012 proposed adjusted aggregate
production quotas were subsequently
published in the Federal Register on
July 5, 2012 (77 FR 39737) in
consideration of the outlined criteria.
All interested persons were invited to
comment on or object to the proposed
adjusted aggregate production quotas on
or before August 6, 2012.
Analysis for Final Adjusted 2012
Aggregate Production Quotas
Consideration has been given to the
criteria outlined in the July 5, 2012,
notice of proposed adjusted aggregate
production quotas in accordance with
21 CFR 1303.13. In addition, nine
companies, eight DEA registered
manufacturers and one non-registrant,
submitted timely comments regarding a
total of 25 Schedule I and II controlled
substances. Comments received
proposed that the aggregate production
quotas for 3,4-Methylenedioxy-NMethylcathinone (methylone),
alfentanil, amphetamine (for
conversion), amphetamine (for sale),
codeine (for conversion), codeine (for
sale), desomorphine, dihydromorphine,
hydrocodone (for sale), hydromorphone,
levomethorphan, lisdexamfetamine,
methadone intermediate,
methylphenidate, morphine (for
conversion), morphine (for sale),
noroxymorphone (for conversion),
noroxymorphone (for sale), oripavine,
oxycodone (for conversion), oxycodone
(for sale), oxymorphone (for
conversion), oxymorphone (for sale),
sufentanil, and tapentadol were
insufficient to provide for the estimated
medical, scientific, research, and
industrial needs of the United States, for
export requirements, and for the
establishment and maintenance of
reserve stocks.
DEA has taken into consideration the
above comments along with the relevant
2011 year-end inventories, initial 2012
manufacturing quotas, 2012 export
requirements, actual and projected 2012
sales, research and product
development requirements, and
additional applications received. Based
on all of the above, the Administrator
has determined that the proposed
adjusted 2012 aggregate production
quotas for 3,4Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV),
3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-Methylcathinone
(methylone), 4-Methyl-NMethylcathinone (mephedrone),
alfentanil, amphetamine (for
conversion), desomorphine,
diethyltryptamine, dihydromorphine,
gamma hydroxybutyric acid,
hydrocodone (for sale), hydromorphone,
levomethorphan, methadone,
methadone intermediate,
methylphenidate, morphine (for sale),
oxycodone (for conversion), oxycodone
(for sale), and sufentanil required
additional consideration and hereby
further adjusts the 2012 aggregate
production quotas for those substances.
Regarding amphetamine (for sale),
codeine (for conversion), codeine (for
sale), morphine (for conversion),
noroxymorphone (for conversion),
noroxymorphone (for sale), oripavine,
oxymorphone (for conversion),
oxymorphone (for sale), and tapentadol,
the Administrator hereby determines
that the proposed adjusted 2012
aggregate production quotas for these
substances as published on July 5, 2012,
at 77 FR 39737 are sufficient to meet the
current 2012 estimated medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States and to provide for
adequate inventories. Pursuant to the
above, the Administrator hereby
establishes the 2012 final aggregate
production quotas for Schedule I and II
controlled substances, expressed in
grams of anhydrous acid or base, as
follows:
Final adjusted
2012 quotas
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Basic Class—Schedule I
1-[1-(2-Thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine .............................................................................................................................................
1-[2-(4-Morpholinyl)ethyl]-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH–200) ........................................................................................................
1-Butyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH–073) .....................................................................................................................................
1-Methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine .....................................................................................................................................
1-Pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH–018) ...................................................................................................................................
2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine ..........................................................................................................................................................
2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET) ................................................................................................................................
2,5-Dimethoxy-4-n-propylthiophenethylamine ...............................................................................................................................
3-Methylfentanyl .............................................................................................................................................................................
3-Methylthiofentanyl .......................................................................................................................................................................
3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) ......................................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Sep 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
5
45
45
2
45
12
12
12
2
2
30
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 175 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55499-55500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22121]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on September 4, 2012, a proposed
Consent Decree in United States v. State of Utah, School and
Institutional Trust Lands Administration, Civil Action No. 2:12-CV-
00841-DBP, was lodged with the United States District Court for the
District of Utah.
The Consent Decree resolves claims by the United States against the
State of Utah, School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration
(``SITLA'') pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''),
42 U.S.C. 9607(a), for response costs incurred in conducting a removal
action at the Cook Slurry Site (``Site'') in Saratoga Springs, Utah
(the ``Removal Action''). Cook Associates Inc., doing business as Cook
Slurry Company (``Cook''), operated an explosives manufacturing
facility at the Site on school trust lands owned by the State of Utah
which predecessor agencies to SITLA had leased to Cook. Under the terms
of the settlement SITLA will reimburse the United States $316,500 of
the costs of completing the Removal Action.
The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30)
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the
proposed settlement agreement. Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either emailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed
to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-
7611, and should refer to United States v. State of Utah, School and
Institutional Trust Lands Administration, Civil Action No. 2:12-CV-
00841-DBP, and D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-10515.
During the public comment period, the settlement agreement may be
examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the settlement
agreement may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or
by faxing or emailing a request to ``Consent Decree Copy''
(EESCDCopy.enrd@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514-5271. If requesting a
[[Page 55500]]
copy from the Consent Decree Library by mail, please enclose a check in
the amount of $3.75 ($.25 per page) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if
by email or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree
Library at the address given above.
Robert Brook,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-22121 Filed 9-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
