Safety Zone; TriRock San Diego, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 54811-54813 [2012-21920]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
pay LIBOR times a notional principal amount
of $100 and will receive 8% times the same
$100 notional principal amount.
(ii) Assume that K properly identifies the
pound borrowing and the swap contracts as
a qualified hedging transaction as provided
in paragraph (a)(8) of this section and that the
other relevant requirements of paragraph (a)
of this section are satisfied.
(iii) Assume also that on January 1, 2014,
the spot exchange rate is £1:$2; the U.S.
dollar LIBOR rate of interest is 9%; and the
market value of K’s note in pounds has not
changed. K terminates swap #2. K will incur
a loss of ($.91) (the present value of $1) with
respect to the termination of such swap on
January 1, 2014. Pursuant to paragraph
(a)(6)(ii)(C) of this section, K must treat swap
#1 as having been sold for its fair market
value on the leg-out date, which is the date
swap #2 is terminated. K must realize and
recognize gain of $100.92 [the present value
of £110 discounted in pounds to equal £100
× $2 ($200) less the present value of $108
($99.08)]. The loss inherent in the pound
borrowing from January 1, 2013 to January 1,
2014 is realized and recognized on January
1, 2014. Such loss is exchange loss in the
amount of $100 [the present value of £110
that was to be paid at the end of the year
discounted at pound interest rates to equal
£100 times the change in exchange rates:
(£100 × $1, the spot rate on January 1, 2013)
¥ (£100 × $2, the spot rate on January 1,
2014)]. Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(8)(iii) of this section (regarding
identification by the Commissioner), the
pound borrowing and currency swap cannot
be part of a qualified hedging transaction for
any period subsequent to the leg-out date.
(iv) Assume the facts are the same as in
paragraph (iii) of this section except that on
January 1, 2014, the U.S. dollar LIBOR rate
of interest is 7% rather than 9%. When K
terminates swap #2, K will realize gain of
$0.93 (the present value of $1) received with
respect to the termination on January 1, 2014.
Fifty percent or more of the remaining pound
cash flow of the pound borrowing remains
hedged after the termination of swap #2.
Accordingly, under paragraph (a)(6)(ii)(F) of
this section, paragraphs (a)(6)(ii)(B) and (C) of
this section do not apply and the gain on
swap #1 and the loss on the qualifying debt
instrument is not taken into account. Thus,
K will include in income $0.93 realized from
termination of swap #2.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a)(10) through (g) [Reserved]. For
further guidance see § 1.988–5(a)(10)
through (g).
(h) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to leg-outs that occur on
or after September 6, 2012.
(i) Expiration date. This section
expires on September 4, 2012.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: August 17, 2012.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2012–21986 Filed 9–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Sep 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0800]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; TriRock San Diego, San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone upon the
navigable waters of the San Diego Bay,
San Diego, CA, in support of a bay swim
in San Diego Harbor. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30
a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on September 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0800. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Deborah Metzger,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619)
278–7656, email
d11marineeventssd@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54811
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this final
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
because it would be impracticable to do
so with respect to this rule, as the
logistical details of the San Diego Bay
swim were not finalized nor presented
to the Coast Guard in enough time to
draft and publish an NPRM. As such,
the event would occur before the
rulemaking process was complete.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest, since immediate
action is needed to ensure public safety.
B. Basis and Purpose
Competitor Group is sponsoring the
TriRock Triathlon, consisting of 2000
swimmers swimming a predetermined
course. The sponsor will provide 18
safety vessels including boats, paddle
boards, and PWCs for this event. A
safety zone is necessary to provide for
the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other
users of the waterway.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone that will be enforced on
September 9, 2012, from 6:30 a.m. to 10
a.m. The limits of the safety zone will
be navigable waters of the San Diego
Bay behind the San Diego Convention
Center bound by the following
coordinates including the marina;
32°42′16″ N, 117°09′58″ W to 32°42′15″
N, 117°10′02″ W then south to 32°42′00″
N, 117°09′45″ W to 32°42′03″ N,
117°09′40″ W.
This safety zone is necessary to
ensure unauthorized personnel and
vessels remain safe by keeping clear
during the bay swim. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
54812
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
This determination is based on the
size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be
hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels may be allowed to
transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times if they
request and obtain authorization from
the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the aforementioned portion of the San
Diego Bay from September 9, 2012, from
6:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule impacts
only a small area of San Diego Harbor,
and will be enforced for only three
hours. Vessel traffic can pass safely
around the zone. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
local notice to mariners (LNM) and will
issue broadcast notice to mariners
(BNM) alerts via marine channel 16
VHF before the safety zone is enforced.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Sep 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone. This rule
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM
Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: August 17, 2012.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2012–21920 Filed 9–5–12; 8:45 am]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Coast Guard
2. Add temporary § 165.T11–516 to
read as follows:
RIN 1625–AA00
■
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T11–516 Safety Zone; TriRock
Triathlon; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will be navigable waters of the San
Diego Bay behind the San Diego
Convention Center bound by the
following coordinates including the
marina; 32°42′16″ N, 117 °09′58″ W to
32°42′15″ N, 117°10′02″ W then south to
32°42′00″ N, 117°09′45″ W to 32°42′03″
N, 117°09′0″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30
a.m. on September 9, 2012. If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the Captain of the Port
will cease enforcement of this safety
zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and
local, state, and federal law enforcement
vessels who have been authorized to act
on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through, or anchoring within this safety
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Sep 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0569]
Safety Zone; Head of the Cuyahoga,
U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race
National Championship, and Dragon
Boat Festival, Cuyahoga River,
Cleveland, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will
establish a temporary safety zone on the
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH. This
safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Cuyahoga
River during the Head of the Cuyahoga,
the U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race
International Championship, and the
Cleveland Dragon Boat Festival. This
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with rowing
regattas.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
on September 15, 2012, until 4 p.m. on
September 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket [USCG–2012–0569]. To view
documents mentioned in this preamble
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54813
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ You may visit the
Docket Management Facility,
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterway Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–
843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On July 3, 2012, we published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Head of the
Cuyahoga and U.S. Rowing Masters
Head Race National Championship,
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH in the
Federal Register (77 FR 39453). We
received 2 comments on the proposed
rule, although both were made by a
single organization—the Lake Carriers’
Association (LCA). The LCA’s
comments are addressed below. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m. on
September 15, 2012, the annual Head of
the Cuyahoga rowing regatta will take
place on the Cuyahoga River in
Cleveland, OH. In conjunction with the
HOTC, the Cleveland Dragon Boat
Festival will take place just north of the
Detroit Superior Viaduct Bridge on the
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH.
Following the HOTC and the
Cleveland Dragon Boat Festival on the
15th of September, the U.S. Rowing
Masters Head Race National
Championship will take place on
September 16th along the same portion
of the Cuyahoga River.
The Captain of the Port Buffalo has
determined that the HOTC, the U.S.
Rowing Masters Head Race National
Championship, and the Cleveland
Dragon Boat Festival rowing events
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54811-54813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21920]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0800]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; TriRock San Diego, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone upon the
navigable waters of the San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, in support of a
bay swim in San Diego Harbor. This safety zone is necessary to provide
for the safety of the participants, crew, spectators, participating
vessels, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on September
9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2012-0800. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Deborah Metzger, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619) 278-7656, email
d11marineeventssd@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
because it would be impracticable to do so with respect to this rule,
as the logistical details of the San Diego Bay swim were not finalized
nor presented to the Coast Guard in enough time to draft and publish an
NPRM. As such, the event would occur before the rulemaking process was
complete.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest, since immediate
action is needed to ensure public safety.
B. Basis and Purpose
Competitor Group is sponsoring the TriRock Triathlon, consisting of
2000 swimmers swimming a predetermined course. The sponsor will provide
18 safety vessels including boats, paddle boards, and PWCs for this
event. A safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users of the
waterway.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced
on September 9, 2012, from 6:30 a.m. to 10 a.m. The limits of the
safety zone will be navigable waters of the San Diego Bay behind the
San Diego Convention Center bound by the following coordinates
including the marina; 32[deg]42'16'' N, 117[deg]09'58'' W to
32[deg]42'15'' N, 117[deg]10'02'' W then south to 32[deg]42'00'' N,
117[deg]09'45'' W to 32[deg]42'03'' N, 117[deg]09'40'' W.
This safety zone is necessary to ensure unauthorized personnel and
vessels remain safe by keeping clear during the bay swim. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, or his designated representative.
[[Page 54812]]
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
This determination is based on the size and location of the safety
zone. Commercial vessels will not be hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels may be allowed to transit through the designated
safety zone during the specified times if they request and obtain
authorization from the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the aforementioned portion of the San Diego Bay from
September 9, 2012, from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule impacts only a small area of San Diego Harbor, and will be
enforced for only three hours. Vessel traffic can pass safely around
the zone. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish a
local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue broadcast notice to
mariners (BNM) alerts via marine channel 16 VHF before the safety zone
is enforced.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one
[[Page 54813]]
of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have
a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T11-516 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-516 Safety Zone; TriRock Triathlon; San Diego Bay, San
Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will be navigable
waters of the San Diego Bay behind the San Diego Convention Center
bound by the following coordinates including the marina; 32[deg]42'16''
N, 117 [deg]09'58'' W to 32[deg]42'15'' N, 117[deg]10'02'' W then south
to 32[deg]42'00'' N, 117[deg]09'45'' W to 32[deg]42'03'' N,
117[deg]09'0'' W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 6:30
a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on September 9, 2012. If the event concludes prior to
the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: August 17, 2012.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2012-21920 Filed 9-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P