Sharing Information Between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense, 54367-54368 [2012-21816]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
By other than a small entity .....
$630.00
(3) For filing a request for an oral
hearing before the Board in an appeal
under 35 U.S.C. 134:
By a small entity (§ 1.27(a)) ......
By other than a small entity .....
$630.00
$1,260.00
Dated: August 31, 2012.
Deborah S. Cohn,
Commissioner for Trademarks, United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2012–21974 Filed 9–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1
RIN 2900–AN95
Sharing Information Between the
Department of Veterans Affairs and the
Department of Defense
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document adopts as
final, without change, the interim final
rule published in the Federal Register
on October 20, 2011. This final rule
removes a Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) regulatory restriction on the
sharing of certain medical information
with the Department of Defense (DoD)
that is not required by the applicable
statute and is inconsistent with the
intent and purpose of that statute.
DATES: Effective Date: September 5,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephania Griffin, Veterans Health
Administration Privacy Officer
(10P2C1), Health Information
Governance, Office of Informatics and
Analytics, Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (704) 245–2492.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
7332(a)(1) of title 38, United States
Code, affords special protection against
the disclosure of VA medical ‘‘[r]ecords
of the identity, diagnosis, prognosis, or
treatment of any patient or subject
which are maintained in connection
with the performance of any program or
activity (including education, training,
treatment, rehabilitation, or research)
relating to drug abuse, alcoholism or
alcohol abuse, infection with the human
immunodeficiency virus, or sickle cell
anemia.’’ However, an exception in
section 7332(e) states: ‘‘The prohibitions
of this section shall not prevent any
interchange of records—(1) within and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Sep 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
among those components of [VA]
furnishing health care to veterans, or
determining eligibility for benefits
under this title; or (2) between such
components furnishing health care to
veterans and the Armed Forces.’’
VA implemented section 7332(e) in
38 CFR 1.461(c)(1); however, in so
doing, we imposed an additional
restriction on the scope of information
that may be exchanged between VA and
DoD, limiting it to only ‘‘information
pertaining to a person relating to a
period when such person is or was
subject to the Uniform Code of Military
Justice.’’ This restriction was narrower
than the statutory restriction, and it
impeded VA’s ability to share with DoD
important medical information
pertaining to veterans and to coordinate
their care and treatment. Further, the
restriction impeded VA’s ability to fully
engage in Presidential- and
Congressional-supported
interoperability initiatives with DoD,
such as electronic health record
initiatives. This regulatory limitation
was not intended to have these negative
results on VA’s ability to provide
comprehensive high-quality health care
to veterans and, where applicable, to
support DoD in similarly caring for
servicemembers and military retirees.
On October 20, 2011, VA published in
the Federal Register, at 76 FR 65133, an
interim final rule that amended 38 CFR
1.461(c)(1) to better conform to
authority granted to VA by Congress.
Interested persons were invited to
submit comments on or before
December 19, 2011, and we received a
total of 3 comments. All of the issues
raised by the commenters are addressed
below.
Two commenters stated general
concerns regarding access to electronic
medical records by DoD and the security
of those records from inappropriate
disclosure or access. VA is committed to
the appropriate protection, use, and
disclosure of information maintained
and exchanged by VA in the course of
official business and to ensuring the
security of that information. The
amendment to 38 CFR 1.461(c)(1) allows
VA to fulfill Congress’ clear intention
that VA and DoD engage in the
exchange of records, but does not affect
the requirement of 38 U.S.C. 7332(e)(2)
that limits VA disclosures to
components of DoD that are ‘‘furnishing
health care to veterans.’’ We do not
make any changes based on these
comments.
One commenter asserted that this
regulation would create a breach of
confidentiality by allowing DoD to
access a veteran’s health information
without authorization by the veteran.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54367
However, the commenter also agreed
that it is important that VA and DoD
have access to veterans’ medical
information to ensure continuity of care,
safety, and for the provision of benefits.
This regulation will ensure that this
access is provided for those reasons by
removing a specific restriction that was
not required by the statutory authority.
In addition, VA will continue to comply
with all other applicable laws and
regulations regarding access to medical
records, including those that limit the
use and disclosure of information to
specifically authorized disclosures. We
do not make any changes based on this
comment.
One commenter suggested that
additional language be included in the
final rule to prevent the misuse of
information ‘‘for unintended, alterative
[sic] purposes beyond medical care.’’
Otherwise, disclosure of information for
purposes other than medical care ‘‘may
deter veterans from seeking care and/or
disability compensation’’ from VA. The
suggested language focuses on the
intended use of the information
accessed under the rule. As we noted
above, the amendment to the rule
complies with the section 7332
limitations on the nature and purpose of
information to be disclosed. Health care
professionals, such as those accessing
information through this provision, are
already duty-bound to access health
information consistent with law and
professional standards. This rule does
not limit or otherwise affect the
enforcement of those laws and
professional standards. Because we
believe the suggested language is
redundant of existing protections and
because other laws and regulations
govern such use and disclosure, we
decline to further amend the regulation.
We do not make any changes based on
this comment.
Based on the rationale set forth here,
and in the interim final rule, we adopt
the interim final rule as a final rule
without any changes.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
revised by this final rule, represents the
exclusive legal authority on this subject.
No contrary rules or procedures are
authorized. All VA guidance will be
read to conform with this rulemaking if
possible or, if not possible, such
guidance is superseded by this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no collections of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
54368
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies this
regulatory amendment will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
rule will not directly affect any small
entities; only individuals could be
directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review) emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review)
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’
which requires review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) unless
OMB waives such review, as ‘‘any
regulatory action that is likely to result
in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined, and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
17:01 Sep 04, 2012
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are:
64.008, Veterans Domiciliary Care;
64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits;
64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care;
64.011, Veterans Dental Care; 64.012,
Veterans Prescription Service; and
64.013, Veterans Prosthetic Appliances.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on August 29, 2012, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Archives and records,
Cemeteries, Claims, Courts, Crime,
Flags, Freedom of information,
Government contracts, Government
employees, Government property,
Infants and children, Penalties, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures.
Dated: August 30, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
PART 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 38 CFR part 1, which was
published at 76 FR 65133 on October
20, 2011, is adopted as a final rule
without changes.
■
[FR Doc. 2012–21816 Filed 9–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AN51
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This rule will have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Jkt 226001
Service Dogs
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) amends its regulations
concerning veterans in need of service
dogs. Under this final rule, VA will
provide to veterans with visual, hearing,
or mobility impairments benefits to
support the use of a service dog as part
of the management of such
impairments. The benefits include
assistance with veterinary care, travel
benefits associated with obtaining and
training a dog, and the provision,
maintenance, and replacement of
hardware required for the dog to
perform the tasks necessary to assist
such veterans.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective October 5, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynnette Nilan, RN, MN, Patient Care
Services, (10P4), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (406) 422–4476.
(This is not a toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
16, 2011, VA published in the Federal
Register (76 FR 35162) a proposed rule
to amend VA regulations to broaden and
clarify current benefits to veterans with
guide dogs, and to establish new
benefits related to service dogs.
Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1714(b) and (c),
VA may provide to veterans enrolled
under 38 U.S.C. 1705 guide dogs trained
for the aid of people who are blind and
service dogs trained for the aid of the
hearing impaired or persons with a
spinal cord injury or dysfunction or
other chronic impairment that
substantially limits mobility. Under
section 1714(d), VA is also authorized to
provide certain travel expenses related
to the provision of such dogs.
In 1961, VA promulgated 38 CFR
17.118(a) (recodified as current 38 CFR
17.154(a) in 1996) restating the statutory
language, which at that time limited
VA’s authority to the provision of guide
dogs for blind veterans. In 2001,
Congress amended section 1714 to
authorize VA to provide service dogs for
veterans with other disabilities. See
Department of Veterans Affairs Health
Care Programs Enhancement Act of
2001, Public Law 107–135, title II, § 201.
This rule implements that authority and
establishes a single regulation relating to
the provision of guide and service dog
benefits by VA.
Interested persons were invited to
submit comments to the proposed rule
on or before August 15, 2011, and we
received 98 comments. All of the issues
raised by the commenters that
concerned at least one portion of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54367-54368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21816]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1
RIN 2900-AN95
Sharing Information Between the Department of Veterans Affairs
and the Department of Defense
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document adopts as final, without change, the interim
final rule published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2011. This
final rule removes a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regulatory
restriction on the sharing of certain medical information with the
Department of Defense (DoD) that is not required by the applicable
statute and is inconsistent with the intent and purpose of that
statute.
DATES: Effective Date: September 5, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephania Griffin, Veterans Health
Administration Privacy Officer (10P2C1), Health Information Governance,
Office of Informatics and Analytics, Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20420, (704) 245-2492. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 7332(a)(1) of title 38, United
States Code, affords special protection against the disclosure of VA
medical ``[r]ecords of the identity, diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment
of any patient or subject which are maintained in connection with the
performance of any program or activity (including education, training,
treatment, rehabilitation, or research) relating to drug abuse,
alcoholism or alcohol abuse, infection with the human immunodeficiency
virus, or sickle cell anemia.'' However, an exception in section
7332(e) states: ``The prohibitions of this section shall not prevent
any interchange of records--(1) within and among those components of
[VA] furnishing health care to veterans, or determining eligibility for
benefits under this title; or (2) between such components furnishing
health care to veterans and the Armed Forces.''
VA implemented section 7332(e) in 38 CFR 1.461(c)(1); however, in
so doing, we imposed an additional restriction on the scope of
information that may be exchanged between VA and DoD, limiting it to
only ``information pertaining to a person relating to a period when
such person is or was subject to the Uniform Code of Military
Justice.'' This restriction was narrower than the statutory
restriction, and it impeded VA's ability to share with DoD important
medical information pertaining to veterans and to coordinate their care
and treatment. Further, the restriction impeded VA's ability to fully
engage in Presidential- and Congressional-supported interoperability
initiatives with DoD, such as electronic health record initiatives.
This regulatory limitation was not intended to have these negative
results on VA's ability to provide comprehensive high-quality health
care to veterans and, where applicable, to support DoD in similarly
caring for servicemembers and military retirees.
On October 20, 2011, VA published in the Federal Register, at 76 FR
65133, an interim final rule that amended 38 CFR 1.461(c)(1) to better
conform to authority granted to VA by Congress. Interested persons were
invited to submit comments on or before December 19, 2011, and we
received a total of 3 comments. All of the issues raised by the
commenters are addressed below.
Two commenters stated general concerns regarding access to
electronic medical records by DoD and the security of those records
from inappropriate disclosure or access. VA is committed to the
appropriate protection, use, and disclosure of information maintained
and exchanged by VA in the course of official business and to ensuring
the security of that information. The amendment to 38 CFR 1.461(c)(1)
allows VA to fulfill Congress' clear intention that VA and DoD engage
in the exchange of records, but does not affect the requirement of 38
U.S.C. 7332(e)(2) that limits VA disclosures to components of DoD that
are ``furnishing health care to veterans.'' We do not make any changes
based on these comments.
One commenter asserted that this regulation would create a breach
of confidentiality by allowing DoD to access a veteran's health
information without authorization by the veteran. However, the
commenter also agreed that it is important that VA and DoD have access
to veterans' medical information to ensure continuity of care, safety,
and for the provision of benefits. This regulation will ensure that
this access is provided for those reasons by removing a specific
restriction that was not required by the statutory authority. In
addition, VA will continue to comply with all other applicable laws and
regulations regarding access to medical records, including those that
limit the use and disclosure of information to specifically authorized
disclosures. We do not make any changes based on this comment.
One commenter suggested that additional language be included in the
final rule to prevent the misuse of information ``for unintended,
alterative [sic] purposes beyond medical care.'' Otherwise, disclosure
of information for purposes other than medical care ``may deter
veterans from seeking care and/or disability compensation'' from VA.
The suggested language focuses on the intended use of the information
accessed under the rule. As we noted above, the amendment to the rule
complies with the section 7332 limitations on the nature and purpose of
information to be disclosed. Health care professionals, such as those
accessing information through this provision, are already duty-bound to
access health information consistent with law and professional
standards. This rule does not limit or otherwise affect the enforcement
of those laws and professional standards. Because we believe the
suggested language is redundant of existing protections and because
other laws and regulations govern such use and disclosure, we decline
to further amend the regulation. We do not make any changes based on
this comment.
Based on the rationale set forth here, and in the interim final
rule, we adopt the interim final rule as a final rule without any
changes.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by this final rule,
represents the exclusive legal authority on this subject. No contrary
rules or procedures are authorized. All VA guidance will be read to
conform with this rulemaking if possible or, if not possible, such
guidance is superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
[[Page 54368]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies this regulatory amendment will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This rule will not directly affect any small entities;
only individuals could be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and
equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are: 64.008, Veterans
Domiciliary Care; 64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.010,
Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011, Veterans Dental Care; 64.012,
Veterans Prescription Service; and 64.013, Veterans Prosthetic
Appliances.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on August 29, 2012, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and procedure, Archives and records,
Cemeteries, Claims, Courts, Crime, Flags, Freedom of information,
Government contracts, Government employees, Government property,
Infants and children, Penalties, Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures.
Dated: August 30, 2012.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
PART 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 38 CFR part 1, which was
published at 76 FR 65133 on October 20, 2011, is adopted as a final
rule without changes.
[FR Doc. 2012-21816 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P