Revisions of Five California Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permits Programs, 54382-54384 [2012-21683]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
54382
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(1) The veteran is diagnosed as having
a visual, hearing, or substantial mobility
impairment; and
(2) The VA clinical team that is
treating the veteran for such impairment
determines based upon medical
judgment that it is optimal for the
veteran to manage the impairment and
live independently through the
assistance of a trained service dog. Note:
If other means (such as technological
devices or rehabilitative therapy) will
provide the same level of independence,
then VA will not authorize benefits
under this section.
(3) For the purposes of this section,
substantial mobility impairment means
a spinal cord injury or dysfunction or
other chronic impairment that
substantially limits mobility. A chronic
impairment that substantially limits
mobility includes but is not limited to
a traumatic brain injury that
compromises a veteran’s ability to make
appropriate decisions based on
environmental cues (i.e., traffic lights or
dangerous obstacles) or a seizure
disorder that causes a veteran to become
immobile during and after a seizure
event.
(c) Recognized service dogs. VA will
recognize, for the purpose of paying
benefits under this section, the
following service dogs:
(1) The dog and veteran must have
successfully completed a training
program offered by an organization
accredited by Assistance Dogs
International or the International Guide
Dog Federation, or both (for dogs that
perform both service- and guide-dog
assistance). The veteran must provide to
VA a certificate showing successful
completion issued by the accredited
organization that provided such
program.
(2) Dogs obtained before September 5,
2012 will be recognized if a guide or
service dog training organization in
existence before September 5, 2012
certifies that the veteran and dog, as a
team, successfully completed, no later
than September 5, 2013, a training
program offered by that training
organization. The veteran must provide
to VA a certificate showing successful
completion issued by the organization
that provided such program.
Alternatively, the veteran and dog will
be recognized if they comply with
paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(d) Authorized benefits. Except as
noted in paragraph (d)(3) of this section,
VA will provide to a veteran enrolled
under 38 U.S.C. 1705 only the following
benefits for one service dog at any given
time in accordance with this section:
(1) A commercially available
insurance policy, to the extent
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Sep 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
commercially practicable, that meets the
following minimum requirements:
(i) VA, and not the veteran, will be
billed for any premiums, copayments, or
deductibles associated with the policy;
however, the veteran will be responsible
for any cost of care that exceeds the
maximum amount authorized by the
policy for a particular procedure, course
of treatment, or policy year. If a dog
requires care that may exceed the
policy’s limit, the insurer will,
whenever reasonably possible under the
circumstances, provide advance notice
to the veteran.
(ii) The policy will guarantee coverage
for all treatment (and associated
prescription medications), subject to
premiums, copayments, deductibles or
annual caps, determined to be medically
necessary, including euthanasia, by any
veterinarian who meets the
requirements of the insurer. The veteran
will not be billed for these covered
costs, and the insurer will directly
reimburse the provider.
(iii) The policy will not exclude dogs
with preexisting conditions that do not
prevent the dog from being a service
dog.
(2) Hardware, or repairs or
replacements for hardware, that are
clinically determined to be required by
the dog to perform the tasks necessary
to assist the veteran with his or her
impairment. To obtain such devices, the
veteran must contact the Prosthetic and
Sensory Aids Service at his or her local
VA medical facility and request the
items needed.
(3) Payments for travel expenses
associated with obtaining a dog under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. Travel
costs will be provided only to a veteran
who has been prescribed a service dog
by a VA clinical team under paragraph
(b) of this section. Payments will be
made as if the veteran is an eligible
beneficiary under 38 U.S.C. 111 and 38
CFR part 70, without regard to whether
the veteran meets the eligibility criteria
as set forth in 38 CFR part 70. Note: VA
will provide payment for travel
expenses related to obtaining a
replacement service dog, even if the
veteran is receiving other benefits under
this section for the service dog that the
veteran needs to replace.
(4) The veteran is responsible for
procuring and paying for any items or
expenses not authorized by this section.
This means that VA will not pay for
items such as license tags,
nonprescription food, grooming,
insurance for personal injury, nonsedated dental cleanings, nail trimming,
boarding, pet-sitting or dog-walking
services, over-the-counter medications,
or other goods and services not covered
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by the policy. The dog is not the
property of VA; VA will never assume
responsibility for, or take possession of,
any service dog.
(e) Dog must maintain ability to
function as a service dog. To continue
to receive benefits under this section,
the service dog must maintain its ability
to function as a service dog. If at any
time VA learns from any source that the
dog is medically unable to maintain that
role, or VA makes a clinical
determination that the veteran no longer
requires the dog, VA will provide at
least 30 days notice to the veteran before
benefits will no longer be authorized.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1714)
(The Office of Management and Budget has
approved the information collection
requirements in this section under control
number 2900–0785.)
■
3. Revise § 17.154 to read as follows:
§ 17.154
Equipment for blind veterans.
VA may furnish mechanical and/or
electronic equipment considered
necessary as aids to overcoming the
handicap of blindness to blind veterans
entitled to disability compensation for a
service-connected disability.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1714)
[FR Doc. 2012–21784 Filed 9–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0955; FRL–9724–2]
Revisions of Five California Clean Air
Act Title V Operating Permits
Programs
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the Operating Permits (Title
V) programs of the Monterey Bay
Unified Air Pollution Control District
(MBUAPCD), San Luis Obispo County
Air Pollution Control District
(SLOCAPCD), Santa Barbara County Air
Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD),
South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD), and Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District
(VCAPCD). We proposed these program
revisions in the Federal Register on
March 21, 2012. These revisions require
sources with the potential to emit (PTE)
of greenhouse gases (GHGs) above the
thresholds in EPA’s Tailoring Rule,
which have not been previously subject
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
54383
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
to Title V for other reasons, to obtain a
Title V permit. See ‘‘Prevention of
Significant Deterioration and Title V
Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule; Final
Rule,’’ (the Tailoring Rule) (75 FR
31514, June 3, 2010).
Effective Date: This rule is
effective on October 5, 2012.
DATES:
EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0955 for
this action. Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
ADDRESSES:
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. Some docket materials,
however, may be publicly available only
at the hard copy location (e.g.,
voluminous records, maps, copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials,
please schedule an appointment during
normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Kohn, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3973, kohn.roger@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA’s Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 21, 2012 (77 FR 16509),
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules as part of the five districts’ title V
operating permit programs.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
MBUAPCD ....................
SLOCAPCD ...................
SBCAPCD .....................
SCAQMD .......................
VCAPCD .......................
218
216
1301
3000
3001
3002
3003
3005
3006
33
33.1
Rule title
Title V: Federal Operating Permits ..............................................................
Federal Part 70 Operating Permits ..............................................................
Part 70 Operating Permits—General Information .......................................
General ........................................................................................................
Applicability.
Requirements.
Applications.
Permit Revisions.
Public Participation.
Part 70 Permits—General ............................................................................
Part 70 Permits—Definitions.
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we did not receive any
comments on our proposal.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. EPA’s Final Action
We did not receive any comments that
change our assessment that the
submitted rules are consistent with Title
V of the Clean Air Act and 40 CFR part
70. Therefore EPA is approving these
revisions to the five districts’ title V
operating permits programs.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Today’s action merely approves State
law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. For that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Sep 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
Adopted
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).In
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
11/17/10
3/23/11
1/20/11
11/5/10
11/7/11
8/19/11
4/21/11
11/5/10
4/12/11
8/19/11
addition, this action does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the action is not
approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Carbon dioxide,
Carbon dioxide equivalents, Greenhouse
gases, Hydrofluorocarbons,
Intergovernmental relations, Methane,
Nitrous oxide, Perfluorocarbons,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur hexafluoride.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 16, 2012.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 70, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 70—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended
by adding under ‘‘California’’ new
■
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
54384
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
paragraphs (r)(5), (z)(5), (aa)(5), (dd)(5),
and (gg)(5) to read as follows:
APPENDIX A TO PART 70—
APPROVAL STATUS OF STATE AND
LOCAL OPERATING PERMITS
PROGRAMS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
California
*
*
(r) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on November
7, 2011. Approval became effective on
October 5, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(z) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on August 19,
2011. Approval became effective on October
5, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(aa) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on April 21,
2011. Approval became effective on October
5, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(dd) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on November
5, 2010. Approval became effective on
October 5, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(gg) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on August 19,
2011. Approval became effective on October
5, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–21683 Filed 9–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 86
[AMS–FRL–9716–5]
Nonconformance Penalties for OnHighway Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
EPA is taking final action to
establish nonconformance penalties
(NCPs) for manufacturers of heavy
heavy-duty diesel engines (HHDDE) in
model years 2012 and later for
emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
because we have found the criteria for
NCPs and the Clean Air Act have been
met. The NOX standards to which these
NCPs apply were established by a rule
published on January 18, 2001. In
general, NCPs allow a manufacturer of
heavy-duty engines (HDEs) whose
engines do not conform to applicable
emission standards, but do not exceed a
designated upper limit, to be issued a
certificate of conformity upon payment
of a monetary penalty to the United
States Government. The upper limit
associated with these NCPs is 0.50
grams of NOX per brake horsepowerhour (g/bhp-hr).
This Final Rule specifies certain
parameters that are entered into the
preexisting penalty formulas along with
the emissions of the engine and the
incorporation of other factors to
determine the amount a manufacturer
must pay. Key parameters that
determine the NCP a manufacturer must
pay are EPA’s estimated cost of
compliance for a near worst-case engine
and the degree to which the engine
exceeds the emission standard (as
measured from production engines).
EPA proposed NCPs for medium
heavy duty diesel engines. However,
EPA is not taking final action with
regard to NCPs for these engines at this
time because EPA has not completed its
review of the data and comments
regarding these engines.
DATES: This rule is effective September
5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
SUMMARY:
Industry ....................................................................................................................................
Chuck Moulis, U.S. EPA, National
Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory,
2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor, MI
48105; Telephone (734) 214–4826;
Email moulis.charles@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities
This action could affect you if you
produce or import new heavy-duty
diesel engines which are intended for
use in highway vehicles such as trucks
and buses or heavy-duty highway
vehicles. The table below gives some
examples of entities that may be affected
by these regulations. However, because
these are only examples, you should
carefully examine the regulations in 40
CFR part 86. If you have questions, call
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
Examples of potentially regulated
entities
336112
336120
Engine and truck manufacturers.
American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
Table of Contents
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NAICS a
Codes
Category
a North
EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–1000. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy in the docket. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the following location: EPA: EPA Docket
Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742.
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of This Action
B. Summary of Today’s Action
C. Impacts of This Action
II. Overview and Background
A. Overview
B. Statutory Authority
C. Background Regarding Nonconformance
Penalty Rules
D. 2007 and 2010 NOX Standards
III. Previous Interim Final Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 Sep 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
IV. NCP Eligibility
A. First Criterion—Whether the MY2010
NOX Standard Is More Stringent than the
Previous NOX Standard
B. Second Criterion—Whether Substantial
Work Will Be Required To Meet the
MY2010 NOX Standard
C. Third Criterion—Whether There Is
Likely To Be a Technological Laggard
D. Issues Raised by the D.C. Circuit Court
of Appeals
V. Penalty Rates
A. Upper Limit
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Cost Parameter Values
C. Resulting Penalties
D. Consideration of Other Methodologies
VI. Economic Impact
VII. Environmental Impact
VIII. Emission Standards for Which We Are
Not Establishing NCPs in This Final Rule
A. Medium Heavy Duty Diesel NOX
Standards
B. Light Heavy-Duty Diesel NOX Standards
C. Heavy-Duty Gasoline Engine Standards
D. Heavy-duty Diesel Engine NMHC, CO,
and PM Standards
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54382-54384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21683]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955; FRL-9724-2]
Revisions of Five California Clean Air Act Title V Operating
Permits Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Operating
Permits (Title V) programs of the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution
Control District (MBUAPCD), San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution
Control District (SLOCAPCD), Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District (SBCAPCD), South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD), and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD).
We proposed these program revisions in the Federal Register on March
21, 2012. These revisions require sources with the potential to emit
(PTE) of greenhouse gases (GHGs) above the thresholds in EPA's
Tailoring Rule, which have not been previously subject
[[Page 54383]]
to Title V for other reasons, to obtain a Title V permit. See
``Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas
Tailoring Rule; Final Rule,'' (the Tailoring Rule) (75 FR 31514, June
3, 2010).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on October 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. Some docket
materials, however, may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., voluminous records, maps, copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To
inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during
normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Kohn, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-
3973, kohn.roger@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA's Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 21, 2012 (77 FR 16509), EPA proposed to approve the
following rules as part of the five districts' title V operating permit
programs.
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MBUAPCD............................ 218 Title V: Federal Operating Permits.. 11/17/10 11/7/11
SLOCAPCD........................... 216 Federal Part 70 Operating Permits... 3/23/11 8/19/11
SBCAPCD............................ 1301 Part 70 Operating Permits--General 1/20/11 4/21/11
Information.
SCAQMD............................. 3000 General............................. 11/5/10 11/5/10
3001 Applicability.......................
3002 Requirements........................
3003 Applications........................
3005 Permit Revisions....................
3006 Public Participation................
VCAPCD............................. 33 Part 70 Permits--General............ 4/12/11 8/19/11
33.1 Part 70 Permits--Definitions........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we did not receive any comments on our proposal.
III. EPA's Final Action
We did not receive any comments that change our assessment that the
submitted rules are consistent with Title V of the Clean Air Act and 40
CFR part 70. Therefore EPA is approving these revisions to the five
districts' title V operating permits programs.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Today's action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).In addition, this action
does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the action is not approved to
apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Carbon dioxide, Carbon dioxide equivalents,
Greenhouse gases, Hydrofluorocarbons, Intergovernmental relations,
Methane, Nitrous oxide, Perfluorocarbons, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur hexafluoride.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 16, 2012.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 70, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 70--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended by adding under ``California'' new
[[Page 54384]]
paragraphs (r)(5), (z)(5), (aa)(5), (dd)(5), and (gg)(5) to read as
follows:
APPENDIX A TO PART 70--APPROVAL STATUS OF STATE AND LOCAL OPERATING
PERMITS PROGRAMS
* * * * *
California
* * * * *
(r) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on November 7, 2011. Approval
became effective on October 5, 2012.
* * * * *
(z) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on August 19, 2011. Approval became
effective on October 5, 2012.
* * * * *
(aa) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on April 21, 2011. Approval became
effective on October 5, 2012.
* * * * *
(dd) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on November 5, 2010. Approval
became effective on October 5, 2012.
* * * * *
(gg) * * *
(5) Revisions were submitted on August 19, 2011. Approval became
effective on October 5, 2012.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-21683 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
