Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; DoD Voucher Processing (DFARS Case 2011-D054), 52258-52259 [2012-21057]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
52258
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
materiel (see https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/corres/pdf/400025m.pdf).
‘‘Unique item identifier (UII)’’ means a set
of data elements permanently marked on an
item that is globally unique and
unambiguous and never changes, in order to
provide traceability of the item throughout its
total life cycle. The term includes a
concatenated UII or a DoD recognized unique
identification equivalent.
‘‘Unit acquisition cost’’ has the meaning
given in FAR clause 52.245–1.
(b) Reporting Government-furnished
property to the IUID Registry. Except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this clause, the
Contractor shall report, in accordance with
paragraph (f), Government-furnished
property to the IUID Registry as follows:—
(1) Up to and including December 31,
2013, report serially managed Governmentfurnished property with a unit-acquisition
cost of $5,000 or greater.
(2) Beginning January 1, 2014, report—
(i) All serially managed Governmentfurnished property, regardless of unitacquisition cost; and
(ii) Contractor receipt of non-serially
managed items. Unless tracked as an
individual item, the Contractor shall report
non-serially managed items to the Registry in
the same unit of packaging, e.g., original
manufacturer’s package, box, or container, as
it was received.
(c) Exceptions. Paragraph (b) of this clause
does not apply to—
(1) Contractor-acquired property;
(2) Property under any statutory leasing
authority;
(3) Property to which the Government has
acquired a lien or title solely because of
partial, advance, progress, or performancebased payments;
(4) Intellectual property or software;
(5) Real property; or
(6) Property released for work in process.
(d) Data for reporting to the IUID Registry.
To permit reporting of Government-furnished
property to the IUID Registry, the
Contractor’s property management system
shall enable the following data elements in
addition to those required by paragraph
(f)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3), (5), (7), (8), and
(10) of the Government Property clause of
this contract (FAR 52.245–1):
(1) Received/Sent (shipped) date.
(2) Status code.
(3) Accountable Government contract
number.
(4) Commercial and Government Entity
(CAGE) code on the accountable Government
contract.
(5) Mark record.
(i) Bagged or tagged code (for items too
small to individually tag or mark).
(ii) Contents (the type of information
recorded on the item, e.g., item internal
control number).
(iii) Effective date (date the mark is
applied).
(iv) Added or removed code/flag.
(v) Marker code (designates which code is
used in the marker identifier, e.g., D=CAGE,
UN=DUNS, LD=DODAAC).
(vi) Marker identifier, e.g., Contractor’s
CAGE code or DUNS number.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Aug 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
(vii) Medium code; how the data is
recorded, e.g., barcode, contact memory
button.
(viii) Value, e.g., actual text or data string
that is recorded in its human-readable form.
(ix) Set (used to group marks when
multiple sets exist.
(6) Appropriate supply condition code,
required only for reporting of reparables, per
Appendix 2 of DoD 4000.25–2–M, Military
Standard Transaction Reporting and
Accounting Procedures manual (https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
400025m.pdf).
(e) When Government-furnished property
is in the possession of subcontractors,
Contractors shall ensure that reporting is
accomplished using the data elements
required in paragraph (d) of this clause.
(f) Procedures for reporting of Governmentfurnished property. Except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor
shall establish and report to the IUID Registry
the information required by FAR clause
52.245–1, paragraphs (e) and (f)(1)(iii), in
accordance with the data submission
procedures at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/
pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html.
(g) Procedures for updating the IUID
Registry.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(2),
the Contractor shall update the IUID Registry
at https:///bpn.gov/iuid for changes in status,
mark, custody, condition code (for reparables
only), or disposition of items that are—
(i) Received by the Contractor;
(ii) Delivered or shipped from the
Contractor’s plant, under Government
instructions, except when shipment is to a
subcontractor or other location of the
Contractor;
(iii) Consumed or expended, reasonably
and properly, or otherwise accounted for, in
the performance of the contract as
determined by the Government property
administrator, including reasonable
inventory adjustments;
(iv) Disposed of; or
(v) Transferred to a follow-on or other
contract.
(2) The Contractor need not report to the
IUID Registry those transactions reported or
to be reported to the following DCMA etools:
(i) Plant Clearance Automated
Reutilization and Screening System
(PCARSS); or
(ii) Lost, Theft, Damaged or Destroyed
(LTDD) system.
(3) The contractor shall update the IUID
Registry as transactions occur or as otherwise
stated in the Contractor’s property
management procedure.
(End of clause)
■ 8. Section 252.251–7000 is amended
by—
■ a. Amending the clause date by
removing ‘‘(NOV 2004)’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘(AUG 2012)’’;
■ b. Revising paragraph (c) introductory
text;
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and
(e) as paragraphs (e) and (f); and
■ d. Adding a new paragraph (d).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
252.251–7000 Ordering From Government
Supply Sources.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) When placing orders for
Government stock on a reimbursable
basis, the Contractor shall—
*
*
*
*
*
(d) When placing orders for
Government stock on a nonreimbursable basis, the Contractor
shall—
(1) Comply with the requirements of
the Contracting Officer’s authorization;
and
(2) When using electronic transactions
to submit requisitions on a nonreimbursable basis only, place orders by
authorizing contract number using the
Defense Logistics Management System
(DLMS) Supplement to Federal
Implementation Convention 511R,
Requisition; and acknowledge receipts
by authorizing contract number using
the DLMS Supplement 527R, Receipt,
Inquiry, Response and Material Receipt
Acknowledgement.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–21059 Filed 8–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 242
RIN 0750–AH52
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; DoD Voucher
Processing (DFARS Case 2011–D054)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is amending the Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to update DoD’s
voucher processing procedures and
better accommodate the Wide Area
WorkFlow (WAWF) used to process
vouchers.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
August 29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
Mark Gomersall, 571–372–6099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 77 FR 2682 on
January 19, 2012. The comment period
closed on March 19, 2012. This rule
revises requirements for approving
interim vouchers and replaces the direct
submission process currently referenced
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
at DFARS 242.803(b)(i)(C) with a riskbased sampling process. Interim
vouchers that are selected using
sampling methodologies will be
reviewed and approved by the contract
auditors for provisional payment and
sent to the disbursing office after a prepayment review. Interim vouchers not
selected for a pre-payment review will
be considered to be provisionally
approved and will be sent directly to the
disbursing office. All provisionally
approved interim vouchers are subject
to a later audit of actual costs incurred.
II. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted a comment
requesting a clarification to the
proposed language at 242.803(b)(i)(A).
The respondent suggested that the
proposed language could be interpreted
to indicate that a contract auditor is
authorized to receive vouchers from
contractors, but only may approve them
when directed by the terms of the
contract. The final rule language at
242.803(b)(i)(A) has been revised to
state that the contract auditor is the
authorized representative of the
contracting officer for receiving
vouchers from contractors
electronically, unless otherwise directed
by the terms of the contract.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because this rule merely updates DoD’s
voucher processing procedures and
better accommodates the Wide Area
WorkFlow used to process vouchers.
However, a final regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed consistent
with 5 U.S.C. 604. This rule revises
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Aug 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
requirements for approving interim
vouchers. Interim vouchers that are
selected using sampling methodologies
will be reviewed and approved by the
contract auditors for provisional
payment, and sent to the disbursing
office after a pre-payment review.
Interim vouchers not selected for a prepayment review will be considered to be
provisionally approved and will be sent
directly to the disbursing office. All
provisionally approved interim
vouchers are subject to a later audit of
actual costs incurred. No significant
issues were raised by the public
comments in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis and no
comments were filed by the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration in response to
the rule. The proposed rule imposes no
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
information collection requirements and
no known significant alternatives to the
rule were identified.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 242
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore 48 CFR part 242 is amended
as follows:
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 242 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Section 242.803(b)(i) is revised to
read as follows:
■
242.803 Disallowing costs after
incurrence.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(i) The contract auditor is the
authorized representative of the
contracting officer for—
(A) Receiving vouchers from
contractors electronically or by other
delivery methods as directed by the
terms of the contract;
(B) Approving interim vouchers that
were selected using sampling
methodologies for provisional payment
and sending them to the disbursing
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52259
office after a pre-payment review.
Interim vouchers not selected for a prepayment review will be considered to be
provisionally approved and will be sent
directly to the disbursing office. All
provisionally approved interim
vouchers are subject to a later audit of
actual costs incurred;
(C) Reviewing completion/final
vouchers and sending them to the
administrative contracting officer; and
(D) Issuing DCAA Forms 1, Notice of
Contract Costs Suspended and/or
Disapproved, to deduct costs where
allowability is questionable.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–21057 Filed 8–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 300 and 635
[Docket No. 120510051–2335–02]
RIN 0648–BC16
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Lifting Trade Restrictive Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule lifts the trade
restrictions on importing bigeye tuna
from Bolivia and Georgia to implement
a recommendation adopted at the 2011
meeting of the International
Commission for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). Additionally,
this rule changes the regulations
containing species-specific harmonized
tariff codes to be consistent with recent
changes adopted by the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC).
DATES: Effective September 28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Warren at 978–281–9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Atlantic tuna fisheries are managed
under the 2006 Consolidated Highly
Migratory Species Fishery Management
Plan and regulations at 50 CFR part 635,
pursuant to the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), and the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA).
Under ATCA, the Secretary shall
promulgate such regulations as may be
necessary and appropriate to carry out
ICCAT Recommendations.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52258-52259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21057]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 242
RIN 0750-AH52
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; DoD Voucher
Processing (DFARS Case 2011-D054)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to update DoD's voucher processing procedures and
better accommodate the Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF) used to process
vouchers.
DATES: August 29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, 571-372-6099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 77 FR 2682
on January 19, 2012. The comment period closed on March 19, 2012. This
rule revises requirements for approving interim vouchers and replaces
the direct submission process currently referenced
[[Page 52259]]
at DFARS 242.803(b)(i)(C) with a risk-based sampling process. Interim
vouchers that are selected using sampling methodologies will be
reviewed and approved by the contract auditors for provisional payment
and sent to the disbursing office after a pre-payment review. Interim
vouchers not selected for a pre-payment review will be considered to be
provisionally approved and will be sent directly to the disbursing
office. All provisionally approved interim vouchers are subject to a
later audit of actual costs incurred.
II. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted a comment requesting a clarification to
the proposed language at 242.803(b)(i)(A). The respondent suggested
that the proposed language could be interpreted to indicate that a
contract auditor is authorized to receive vouchers from contractors,
but only may approve them when directed by the terms of the contract.
The final rule language at 242.803(b)(i)(A) has been revised to state
that the contract auditor is the authorized representative of the
contracting officer for receiving vouchers from contractors
electronically, unless otherwise directed by the terms of the contract.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because this rule
merely updates DoD's voucher processing procedures and better
accommodates the Wide Area WorkFlow used to process vouchers. However,
a final regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed consistent
with 5 U.S.C. 604. This rule revises requirements for approving interim
vouchers. Interim vouchers that are selected using sampling
methodologies will be reviewed and approved by the contract auditors
for provisional payment, and sent to the disbursing office after a pre-
payment review. Interim vouchers not selected for a pre-payment review
will be considered to be provisionally approved and will be sent
directly to the disbursing office. All provisionally approved interim
vouchers are subject to a later audit of actual costs incurred. No
significant issues were raised by the public comments in response to
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis and no comments were filed
by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
in response to the rule. The proposed rule imposes no reporting,
recordkeeping, or other information collection requirements and no
known significant alternatives to the rule were identified.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 242
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore 48 CFR part 242 is amended as follows:
PART 242--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 242 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Section 242.803(b)(i) is revised to read as follows:
242.803 Disallowing costs after incurrence.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(i) The contract auditor is the authorized representative of the
contracting officer for--
(A) Receiving vouchers from contractors electronically or by other
delivery methods as directed by the terms of the contract;
(B) Approving interim vouchers that were selected using sampling
methodologies for provisional payment and sending them to the
disbursing office after a pre-payment review. Interim vouchers not
selected for a pre-payment review will be considered to be
provisionally approved and will be sent directly to the disbursing
office. All provisionally approved interim vouchers are subject to a
later audit of actual costs incurred;
(C) Reviewing completion/final vouchers and sending them to the
administrative contracting officer; and
(D) Issuing DCAA Forms 1, Notice of Contract Costs Suspended and/or
Disapproved, to deduct costs where allowability is questionable.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-21057 Filed 8-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P