Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the Philadelphia-Wilmington, Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware 1997 Fine Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area, 51930-51933 [2012-21046]
Download as PDF
51930
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
than the 30th day following the end of
each six month period.
(5) Owner/operator shall submit an
annual emissions limitation calculation
report no later than the 30th day
following the end of the calendar year
or quarter if a rolling average is required
in paragraph (c).
(j) Notifications. (1) Owner/operator
shall submit notification of
commencement of construction of any
equipment which is being constructed
to comply with the emission limits in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Owner/operator shall submit semiannual progress reports on construction
of any such equipment.
(3) Owner/operator shall submit
notification of initial startup of any such
equipment.
(k) Equipment operation. At all times,
owner/operator shall maintain each
unit, including associated air pollution
control equipment, in a manner
consistent with good air pollution
control practices for minimizing
emissions.
(l) Credible Evidence. Nothing in this
section shall preclude the use, including
the exclusive use, of any credible
evidence or information, relevant to
whether a source would have been in
compliance with requirements of this
section if the appropriate performance
or compliance test procedures or
method had been performed.
[FR Doc. 2012–21056 Filed 8–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0391; FRL–9719–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the
Philadelphia-Wilmington,
Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware
1997 Fine Particulate Matter
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania on April 12, 2010, as
amended on August 3, 2012. The SIP
revision demonstrates attainment of the
1997 annual fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) for the PhiladelphiaWilmington, Pennsylvania-New JerseyDelaware (PA-NJ-DE) nonattainment
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Aug 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
area (Philadelphia Area). This
Pennsylvania SIP revision (herein called
the ‘‘attainment plan’’) includes the
Philadelphia Area’s attainment
demonstration and the motor vehicle
emission budgets (MVEBs) used for
transportation conformity purposes in
Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery
and Philadelphia Counties in
Pennsylvania. The attainment plan also
includes a base year emissions
inventory and contingency measures.
On August 3, 2012, Pennsylvania
withdrew the analysis of reasonably
available control measures and
reasonably available control technology
(RACM/RACT) from the attainment plan
because the requirement was suspended
by a clean data determination for the
Philadelphia Area. Furthermore, EPA
has determined that a reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan is not required
because Pennsylvania projected that
attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
occurred in the Philadelphia Area by
the attainment date of April 2010. This
action is being taken in accordance with
the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Clean
Air Fine Particulate Implementation
Rule (PM2.5 Implementation Rule)
published on April 25, 2007.
I. Background
On November 2, 2011 (76 FR 67640),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The
NPR proposed approval of the
Pennsylvania 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS attainment plan for the
Philadelphia Area.
On November 27, 2009 (74 FR 62251),
EPA published findings of failure to
submit a SIP revision that demonstrates
attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for
the Philadelphia Area. On April 12,
2010, the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania through the Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP)
submitted a formal SIP revision and on
June 19, 2010, EPA determined that this
SIP revision met the requirements for
completeness found in section 110(k)(1)
of the CAA. On May 16, 2012 (77 FR
28782), EPA published a clean data
determination and determination of
attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by the attainment date of April
5, 2010.
On May 12, 2005 (76 FR 70093), EPA
published the Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) that addresses the interstate
transport requirements of the CAA with
DATES: This final rule is effective on
respect to the 1997 ozone and 1997
September 27, 2012.
PM2.5 NAAQS. As originally
promulgated, CAIR required significant
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
reductions in emissions of sulfur
docket for this action under Docket ID
dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOX)
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0391. All
to limit the interstate transport of these
documents in the docket are listed in
pollutants. In 2008, however, the DC
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Circuit Court of Appeals (‘‘the Court’’)
Although listed in the electronic docket, remanded CAIR back to EPA. See North
some information is not publicly
Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176. The
available, i.e., confidential business
Court found CAIR to be inconsistent
information (CBI) or other information
with the requirements of the CAA,
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896
Certain other material, such as
(D.C. Cir. 2008), but ultimately
copyrighted material, is not placed on
remanded the rule to EPA without
the Internet and will be publicly
vacatur because it found that ‘‘allowing
available only in hard copy form.
CAIR to remain in effect until it is
Publicly available docket materials are
replaced by a rule consistent with [the
available either electronically through
Court’s] opinion would at least
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for temporarily preserve the environmental
public inspection during normal
values covered by CAIR.’’ See North
business hours at the Air Protection
Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d at 1178. CAIR
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection thus remained in place following the
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
remand, and was in place and
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
enforceable through the April 5, 2010
Copies of the State submittal are
attainment date. In response to the
available at the Pennsylvania
Court’s decision, EPA has issued a new
Department of Environmental
rule to address interstate transport of
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality
NOX and SO2 in the Eastern United
Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
States (i.e., the Transport Rule, also
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
known as the Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule). See 76 FR 48208, August 8, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
In the Transport Rule, EPA finalized
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by email at
regulatory changes to sunset (i.e.,
quinto.rose@epa.gov.
discontinue) CAIR and the CAIR Federal
Implementation Plans (FIPs) for control
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
periods in 2012 and beyond. See 76 FR
48322.
On December 30, 2011, the Court
issued an order addressing the status of
the Transport Rule and CAIR in
response to motions filed by numerous
parties seeking a stay of the Transport
Rule pending judicial review. In that
order, the Court stayed the Transport
Rule pending the Court’s resolution of
the petitions for review of that rule in
EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA
(No. 11–1302 and consolidated cases).
The Court also indicated that EPA is
expected to continue to administer the
CAIR in the interim until the Court rules
on the petitions for review of the
Transport Rule.
EPA does not believe that the
circumstances set forth above preclude
EPA from approving the April 12, 2012
Pennsylvania attainment plan as
amended on August 3, 2012 for the
Philadelphia Area. While the
monitoring data that show the
Philadelphia Area attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the April 2010
attainment deadline was impacted by
CAIR, CAIR was in place and
enforceable through the 2010 attainment
date that is relevant to acting on this
attainment plan. Moreover, EPA’s
analysis conducted for the Transport
Rule demonstrates that the Philadelphia
Area would be able to attain the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS even in the
absence of either CAIR or the Transport
Rule. See Appendix B to the Air Quality
Modeling Final Rule Technical Support
Document for the Transport Rule.
Most importantly, EPA notes that this
action is approving an attainment plan
that demonstrated that the Philadelphia
Area would attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by 2010, which it did. As
of 2010, CAIR was an enforceable
control measure applicable to affected
sources in the area, as well as sources
throughout the Eastern United States.
As such, the fact that CAIR is now in
place only temporarily as a result of the
judicial remand of CAIR does not
detract from our conclusion that the
attainment plan should be approved.
Further, the fact that the Court has
stayed the implementation of the
Transport Rule at this time is not
relevant because, as noted above, EPA’s
modeling for the Transport Rule
demonstrates the Philadelphia Area
would be able to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 even in the absence of CAIR and
the Transport Rule. Finally, the
Transport Rule, as promulgated, only
addresses emissions in 2012 and
beyond. As such, neither the Transport
Rule itself, nor the judicial stay of the
Transport Rule, is relevant to the
question addressed in this proposal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Aug 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
notice. The purpose of this action is to
determine whether the attainment plan
submitted by Pennsylvania is sufficient
to bring the Philadelphia Area into
attainment by the April 2010 attainment
date, a date before the Transport Rule
was even promulgated. For these
reasons, neither the current status of
CAIR nor the current status of the
Transport Rule affects any of the criteria
for proposed approval of this SIP
revision.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Pennsylvania’s SIP revision
demonstrates attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the
Philadelphia Area. This April 12, 2010
attainment plan as amended on August
3, 2012, includes Pennsylvania’s
attainment demonstration, MVEBs used
for transportation conformity purposes
for the five counties in the Philadelphia
Area, a base year emissions inventory,
and contingency measures. A RFP plan
is not required under the applicable
implementation rule because the
Philadelphia Area demonstrated that
attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS occurred by the attainment date
of April 2010. See 40 CFR 51.1009(b)
and 72 FR 20633 (April 25, 2007). In
addition, because EPA determined on
May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28782) that the
Philadelphia Area attained by its
required attainment date in accordance
with section 179(c)(9) of the CAA, no
contingency measures for failure to
attain by this date need to be
implemented, and further EPA action
respecting nonattainment contingency
measures is unnecessary. Furthermore,
as set forth in the PM2.5 Implementation
Rule, areas that attained the NAAQS by
the attainment date are considered to
have satisfied the requirement to show
RFP, and as such do not need to
implement contingency measures to
make further progress to attainment.
EPA has determined that the
Philadelphia Area attained by the
attainment date, therefore the
contingency measures submitted by
Pennsylvania are no longer necessary
for the Philadelphia Area to meet RFP
requirements or to attain the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the attainment
date.
On August 3, 2012, Michael L.
Krancer, Secretary of PADEP sent a
letter to Shawn M. Garvin, Regional
Administrator of EPA Region III
withdrawing the analysis of RACM/
RACT which had been included in the
April 12, 2010 attainment plan since the
requirement for the RACM/RACT
analysis was suspended by the May 16,
2012 (77 FR 28782) clean data
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51931
51.1004(c). Specifically, PADEP
withdrew section IV.B. in its entirety,
pages 29–31 in part, and Appendix G in
its entirety.
Other specific requirements of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS attainment
plan for the Philadelphia Area and the
rationale for EPA’s proposed action are
explained in the NPR and will not be
restated here. On December 2, 2011,
EPA received comments on the
November 2, 2011 NPR. A summary of
those comments and EPA’s responses
are provided in section III of this
document.
III. Summary of Public Comments and
EPA Responses
Comment: A commenter requests
clarification with regard to the
procedures for collecting emissions
inventory data from the Port of
Philadelphia and the accuracy of the
data applied in this attainment plan.
Response: Emissions from the Port of
Philadelphia are not considered
‘‘facility or point’’ emissions but rather
treated as part of the nonroad data
category. Nonroad data category consists
of off-highway categories—such as
cranes, yard trucks, locomotives and
marine vessels. Therefore, emissions in
the inventory are aggregated to the
county level, separated by source
category. Specifically, port emissions
are comprised of marine vessels and
land-based sources (such as cargo
handling equipment) at ports. Activity
data for land-based sources collected
from various sources are used as inputs
to EPA’s NONROAD model. Marine
vessels’ emissions are calculated outside
of the NONROAD model because the
NONROAD model does not include
marine vessel emissions.
EPA reviewed the methodology that
PADEP used to estimate marine vessel
emissions and found that proper
guidance was followed pertaining to
gathering characteristics of the port that
included the types of vessels, the
shipping traffic, arrival information, and
any limitations on the data gathered.
EPA verified that the marine vessels’
emissions were accounted for in the
supporting spreadsheets provided for
nonroad emission estimates. EPA also
verified that land-based sources for
cargo handling equipment, such as
terminal tractors, cranes, container
handlers and forklifts, were accounted
for in the nonroad spreadsheets by
county provided by PADEP.
Comment: A commenter requests
clarification and additional information
with regard to Pennsylvania’s
enforcement of the Diesel-Powered
Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling Act
(Act 124—anti-idling requirements) and
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
51932
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
suggests that the attainment plan should
offer more detailed ‘‘estimations of
emission reductions resulting from Act
124.’’
Response: Additional information is
publicly available and may be found at
https://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/
deputate/airwaste/aq/cars/idling.htm.
This Internet site directs viewers to
contact the PADEP’s Bureau of Air
Quality for additional information
pertaining to Act 124. Additionally,
while the commenter suggests that the
attainment plan should offer more
detailed ‘‘estimations of emission
reductions resulting from Act 124,’’
Pennsylvania does not rely on any
emission reductions resulting from the
enforcement of Act 124 in order to
demonstrate attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. However,
Pennsylvania does include Act 124 as a
contingency measure. Since EPA has
determined that the Philadelphia Area
attained by its required attainment date,
in accordance with section 172(c)(9) of
the CAA, no contingency measures for
failure to attain by this date or make
reasonable further progress need to be
implemented at this time. Therefore, the
attainment plan provides sufficient
estimations of emission reductions
resulting from Act 124.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Pennsylvania’s
April 12, 2010 attainment plan as
amended on August 3, 2012 for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the
Philadelphia Area as a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP. EPA has determined
that the SIP revision meets the
applicable requirements of the CAA, as
described in the PM2.5 Implementation
Rule. Specifically, EPA is approving
only Pennsylvania’s attainment
demonstration, associated MVEBs used
for transportation conformity purposes,
the base year emissions inventory, and
contingency measures. PADEP
withdrew the RACM/RACT analysis
section of the attainment plan as
amended on August 3, 2012 because the
requirement for RACM/RACT was
suspended by the May 16, 2012 clean
data determination pursuant to 40 CFR
51.1004(c). Furthermore, EPA has
determined that the requirement for RFP
plan is satisfied because Pennsylvania
demonstrated attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Philadelphia Area by April 5, 2010.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Aug 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by October 29, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
pertaining to the Pennsylvania 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS attainment plan
for the Philadelphia Area, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2) of the CAA.)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: August 9, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(e)(1) is amended by adding an entry for
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS attainment plan
at the end of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
*
*
51933
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
Applicable geographic area
*
*
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS Attainment Demonstration, 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory, Contingency Measures and Motor Vehicle Emission
Budgets for 2009.
EPA approval date
Additional
explanation
*
4/12/10, 8/3/12
*
8/28/12 [Insert
page number
where the document begins].
*
*
*
Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE PM2.5
Nonattainment Area.
[FR Doc. 2012–21046 Filed 8–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 5b
[Docket Number NIH–2011–0001]
Privacy Act; Implementation
Department of Health and
Human Services.
ACTION: Direct Final rule.
AGENCY:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
State submittal date
Register withdrawing this direct final
rule before its effective date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by [Docket No(s).], by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• Fax: 301–402–0169.
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and
• Mail: Jerry Moore, NIH Regulations
Human Services (HHS or Department),
through the National Institutes of Health Officer, Office of Management
(NIH), is implementing a new system of Assessment, National Institutes of
Health, 6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite
records, 09–25–0223, ‘‘NIH Records
601, MSC 7669, Rockville, MD 20852–
Related to Research Misconduct
7669.
Proceedings, HHS/NIH.’’ HHS is
To ensure more timely processing of
exempting this system of records from
comments, HHS/NIH is no longer
certain provisions of the Privacy Act to
accepting comments submitted to the
protect the integrity of NIH research
agency by email. HHS/NIH encourages
misconduct proceedings and to protect
you to continue to submit electronic
the identity of confidential sources in
comments by using the Federal
such proceedings. HHS is issuing a
eRulemaking Portal, as described
direct final rule for this action because
previously, in the ADDRESSES portion of
the agency expects that there will be no
this document under Electronic
significant adverse comment on this
Submissions.
rule. Elsewhere in this issue of the
Instructions: All submissions received
Federal Register, HHS is publishing a
must include the agency name and
companion proposed rule under the
agency’s usual procedure for notice-and- Docket No. for this rulemaking. All
comments received may be posted
comment rulemaking to provide a
without change to https://
procedural framework to finalize the
rule in the event the agency receives any www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
significant comments and withdraws
Docket: For access to the docket to
this direct final rule. The companion
read background documents or
proposed rule and this direct final rule
comments received, go to https://
are substantively identical.
www.regulations.gov and follow the
DATES: This rule is effective January 10,
instructions provided for conducting a
2013. Submit either electronic or
search, using the docket number(s)
written comments by November 13,
found in brackets in the heading of this
2012. If HHS/NIH receives no
significant adverse comments within the document.
specified comment period, the agency
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
will publish a document confirming the Moore, NIH Regulations Officer, Office
effective date of the final rule in the
of Management Assessment, National
Federal Register within 30 days after
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
the comment period on this direct final
Boulevard, Suite 601, MSC 7669,
rule ends. If timely significant adverse
Rockville, MD 20852–7669, telephone
comments are received, the agency will
301–496–4607, fax 301–402–0169, email
publish a document in the Federal
jm40z@nih.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Aug 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NIH is
implementing a new system of records
called, ‘‘NIH Records Related to
Research Misconduct Proceedings’’ (09–
25–0223). This system of records is part
of NIH’s implementation of its
responsibilities under the Public Health
Service (PHS) Policies on Research
Misconduct, 42 CFR part 93. The system
notice applies to alleged or actual
research misconduct involving research:
(1) Carried out in NIH facilities by any
person; (2) funded by the NIH
Intramural Research Program (IRP) in
any location; or (3) undertaken by an
NIH employee or trainee as part of his
or her official NIH duties or NIH
training activities, regardless of location.
A person who, at the time of the alleged
or actual research misconduct, was
employed by, was an agent of, or was
affiliated by contract, agreement, or
other arrangement with NIH, is covered
by the system if, for example, he or she
is involved in: (1) NIH- or PHSsupported biomedical or behavioral
research; (2) NIH- or PHS-supported
biomedical or behavioral research
training programs; (3) NIH- or PHSsupported activities that are related to
biomedical or behavioral research or
research training, such as the operation
of tissue and data banks and the
dissemination of research information;
(4) plagiarism of research records
produced in the course of NIH- or PHSsupported research, research training or
activities related to that research or
research training; or (5) an application
or proposal for NIH or PHS support for
biomedical or behavioral research,
research training or activities related to
that research or research training, such
as the operation of tissue and data banks
and the dissemination of research
information (regardless of whether it is
approved or funded).
The term ‘‘research misconduct’’ is
defined at 42 CFR 93.103 to mean
‘‘fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism
in proposing, performing, or reviewing
research, or in reporting research
results.’’ The general policy of the PHS
Policies on Research Misconduct is that
‘‘Research misconduct involving PHS
support is contrary to the interests of the
PHS and the Federal government and to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51930-51933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21046]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0391; FRL-9719-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Attainment Plan for the Philadelphia-Wilmington,
Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware 1997 Fine Particulate Matter
Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on April 12, 2010, as
amended on August 3, 2012. The SIP revision demonstrates attainment of
the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for the Philadelphia-Wilmington,
Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware (PA-NJ-DE) nonattainment area
(Philadelphia Area). This Pennsylvania SIP revision (herein called the
``attainment plan'') includes the Philadelphia Area's attainment
demonstration and the motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) used for
transportation conformity purposes in Bucks, Chester, Delaware,
Montgomery and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania. The attainment
plan also includes a base year emissions inventory and contingency
measures. On August 3, 2012, Pennsylvania withdrew the analysis of
reasonably available control measures and reasonably available control
technology (RACM/RACT) from the attainment plan because the requirement
was suspended by a clean data determination for the Philadelphia Area.
Furthermore, EPA has determined that a reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan is not required because Pennsylvania projected that
attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS occurred in the
Philadelphia Area by the attainment date of April 2010. This action is
being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Clean
Air Fine Particulate Implementation Rule (PM2.5
Implementation Rule) published on April 25, 2007.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0391. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by
email at quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 2, 2011 (76 FR 67640), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The NPR
proposed approval of the Pennsylvania 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS attainment plan for the Philadelphia Area.
On November 27, 2009 (74 FR 62251), EPA published findings of
failure to submit a SIP revision that demonstrates attainment of the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for the Philadelphia Area. On April 12,
2010, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through the Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted a formal SIP revision and on
June 19, 2010, EPA determined that this SIP revision met the
requirements for completeness found in section 110(k)(1) of the CAA. On
May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28782), EPA published a clean data determination
and determination of attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by the attainment date of April 5, 2010.
On May 12, 2005 (76 FR 70093), EPA published the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) that addresses the interstate transport
requirements of the CAA with respect to the 1997 ozone and 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS. As originally promulgated, CAIR required
significant reductions in emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2)
and nitrogen oxides (NOX) to limit the interstate transport
of these pollutants. In 2008, however, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals
(``the Court'') remanded CAIR back to EPA. See North Carolina v. EPA,
550 F.3d 1176. The Court found CAIR to be inconsistent with the
requirements of the CAA, North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir.
2008), but ultimately remanded the rule to EPA without vacatur because
it found that ``allowing CAIR to remain in effect until it is replaced
by a rule consistent with [the Court's] opinion would at least
temporarily preserve the environmental values covered by CAIR.'' See
North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d at 1178. CAIR thus remained in place
following the remand, and was in place and enforceable through the
April 5, 2010 attainment date. In response to the Court's decision, EPA
has issued a new rule to address interstate transport of NOX
and SO2 in the Eastern United States (i.e., the Transport
Rule, also known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule). See 76 FR
48208, August 8, 2011. In the Transport Rule, EPA finalized regulatory
changes to sunset (i.e., discontinue) CAIR and the CAIR Federal
Implementation Plans (FIPs) for control
[[Page 51931]]
periods in 2012 and beyond. See 76 FR 48322.
On December 30, 2011, the Court issued an order addressing the
status of the Transport Rule and CAIR in response to motions filed by
numerous parties seeking a stay of the Transport Rule pending judicial
review. In that order, the Court stayed the Transport Rule pending the
Court's resolution of the petitions for review of that rule in EME
Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA (No. 11-1302 and consolidated
cases). The Court also indicated that EPA is expected to continue to
administer the CAIR in the interim until the Court rules on the
petitions for review of the Transport Rule.
EPA does not believe that the circumstances set forth above
preclude EPA from approving the April 12, 2012 Pennsylvania attainment
plan as amended on August 3, 2012 for the Philadelphia Area. While the
monitoring data that show the Philadelphia Area attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the April 2010 attainment deadline was
impacted by CAIR, CAIR was in place and enforceable through the 2010
attainment date that is relevant to acting on this attainment plan.
Moreover, EPA's analysis conducted for the Transport Rule demonstrates
that the Philadelphia Area would be able to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS even in the absence of either CAIR or the
Transport Rule. See Appendix B to the Air Quality Modeling Final Rule
Technical Support Document for the Transport Rule.
Most importantly, EPA notes that this action is approving an
attainment plan that demonstrated that the Philadelphia Area would
attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by 2010, which it did. As
of 2010, CAIR was an enforceable control measure applicable to affected
sources in the area, as well as sources throughout the Eastern United
States. As such, the fact that CAIR is now in place only temporarily as
a result of the judicial remand of CAIR does not detract from our
conclusion that the attainment plan should be approved. Further, the
fact that the Court has stayed the implementation of the Transport Rule
at this time is not relevant because, as noted above, EPA's modeling
for the Transport Rule demonstrates the Philadelphia Area would be able
to attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 even in the absence of CAIR
and the Transport Rule. Finally, the Transport Rule, as promulgated,
only addresses emissions in 2012 and beyond. As such, neither the
Transport Rule itself, nor the judicial stay of the Transport Rule, is
relevant to the question addressed in this proposal notice. The purpose
of this action is to determine whether the attainment plan submitted by
Pennsylvania is sufficient to bring the Philadelphia Area into
attainment by the April 2010 attainment date, a date before the
Transport Rule was even promulgated. For these reasons, neither the
current status of CAIR nor the current status of the Transport Rule
affects any of the criteria for proposed approval of this SIP revision.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Pennsylvania's SIP revision demonstrates attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the Philadelphia Area. This April 12,
2010 attainment plan as amended on August 3, 2012, includes
Pennsylvania's attainment demonstration, MVEBs used for transportation
conformity purposes for the five counties in the Philadelphia Area, a
base year emissions inventory, and contingency measures. A RFP plan is
not required under the applicable implementation rule because the
Philadelphia Area demonstrated that attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS occurred by the attainment date of April 2010.
See 40 CFR 51.1009(b) and 72 FR 20633 (April 25, 2007). In addition,
because EPA determined on May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28782) that the
Philadelphia Area attained by its required attainment date in
accordance with section 179(c)(9) of the CAA, no contingency measures
for failure to attain by this date need to be implemented, and further
EPA action respecting nonattainment contingency measures is
unnecessary. Furthermore, as set forth in the PM2.5
Implementation Rule, areas that attained the NAAQS by the attainment
date are considered to have satisfied the requirement to show RFP, and
as such do not need to implement contingency measures to make further
progress to attainment. EPA has determined that the Philadelphia Area
attained by the attainment date, therefore the contingency measures
submitted by Pennsylvania are no longer necessary for the Philadelphia
Area to meet RFP requirements or to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the attainment date.
On August 3, 2012, Michael L. Krancer, Secretary of PADEP sent a
letter to Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator of EPA Region III
withdrawing the analysis of RACM/RACT which had been included in the
April 12, 2010 attainment plan since the requirement for the RACM/RACT
analysis was suspended by the May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28782) clean data
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c). Specifically, PADEP
withdrew section IV.B. in its entirety, pages 29-31 in part, and
Appendix G in its entirety.
Other specific requirements of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS attainment plan for the Philadelphia Area and the rationale for
EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR and will not be restated
here. On December 2, 2011, EPA received comments on the November 2,
2011 NPR. A summary of those comments and EPA's responses are provided
in section III of this document.
III. Summary of Public Comments and EPA Responses
Comment: A commenter requests clarification with regard to the
procedures for collecting emissions inventory data from the Port of
Philadelphia and the accuracy of the data applied in this attainment
plan.
Response: Emissions from the Port of Philadelphia are not
considered ``facility or point'' emissions but rather treated as part
of the nonroad data category. Nonroad data category consists of off-
highway categories--such as cranes, yard trucks, locomotives and marine
vessels. Therefore, emissions in the inventory are aggregated to the
county level, separated by source category. Specifically, port
emissions are comprised of marine vessels and land-based sources (such
as cargo handling equipment) at ports. Activity data for land-based
sources collected from various sources are used as inputs to EPA's
NONROAD model. Marine vessels' emissions are calculated outside of the
NONROAD model because the NONROAD model does not include marine vessel
emissions.
EPA reviewed the methodology that PADEP used to estimate marine
vessel emissions and found that proper guidance was followed pertaining
to gathering characteristics of the port that included the types of
vessels, the shipping traffic, arrival information, and any limitations
on the data gathered. EPA verified that the marine vessels' emissions
were accounted for in the supporting spreadsheets provided for nonroad
emission estimates. EPA also verified that land-based sources for cargo
handling equipment, such as terminal tractors, cranes, container
handlers and forklifts, were accounted for in the nonroad spreadsheets
by county provided by PADEP.
Comment: A commenter requests clarification and additional
information with regard to Pennsylvania's enforcement of the Diesel-
Powered Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling Act (Act 124--anti-idling
requirements) and
[[Page 51932]]
suggests that the attainment plan should offer more detailed
``estimations of emission reductions resulting from Act 124.''
Response: Additional information is publicly available and may be
found at https://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/cars/idling.htm. This Internet site directs viewers to contact the PADEP's
Bureau of Air Quality for additional information pertaining to Act 124.
Additionally, while the commenter suggests that the attainment plan
should offer more detailed ``estimations of emission reductions
resulting from Act 124,'' Pennsylvania does not rely on any emission
reductions resulting from the enforcement of Act 124 in order to
demonstrate attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
However, Pennsylvania does include Act 124 as a contingency measure.
Since EPA has determined that the Philadelphia Area attained by its
required attainment date, in accordance with section 172(c)(9) of the
CAA, no contingency measures for failure to attain by this date or make
reasonable further progress need to be implemented at this time.
Therefore, the attainment plan provides sufficient estimations of
emission reductions resulting from Act 124.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Pennsylvania's April 12, 2010 attainment plan as
amended on August 3, 2012 for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
for the Philadelphia Area as a revision to the Pennsylvania SIP. EPA
has determined that the SIP revision meets the applicable requirements
of the CAA, as described in the PM2.5 Implementation Rule.
Specifically, EPA is approving only Pennsylvania's attainment
demonstration, associated MVEBs used for transportation conformity
purposes, the base year emissions inventory, and contingency measures.
PADEP withdrew the RACM/RACT analysis section of the attainment plan as
amended on August 3, 2012 because the requirement for RACM/RACT was
suspended by the May 16, 2012 clean data determination pursuant to 40
CFR 51.1004(c). Furthermore, EPA has determined that the requirement
for RFP plan is satisfied because Pennsylvania demonstrated attainment
of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the Philadelphia Area by
April 5, 2010.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 29, 2012. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action pertaining to the Pennsylvania 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS attainment plan for the Philadelphia Area, may
not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2) of the CAA.)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 9, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding
an entry for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS attainment plan at the end
of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
[[Page 51933]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable geographic State submittal Additional
revision area date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS Attainment Pennsylvania portion 4/12/10, 8/3/12 8/28/12 [Insert .................
Demonstration, 2002 Base Year of the Philadelphia- page number
Emissions Inventory, Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE where the
Contingency Measures and PM2.5 Nonattainment document begins].
Motor Vehicle Emission Area.
Budgets for 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2012-21046 Filed 8-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P