Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 51684-51686 [2012-21036]
Download as PDF
51684
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0093; FV12–932–1
FR]
Olives Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
California Olive Committee (Committee)
for 2012 and subsequent fiscal years
from $16.61 to $31.32 per assessable ton
of olives handled. The Committee
locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of olives
grown in California. Assessments upon
olive handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The
fiscal year began January 1 and ends
December 31. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: August 28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUMMARY:
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 148 and Order No. 932, both as
amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating
the handling of olives grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:57 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California olive handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable olives
beginning on January 1, 2012, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2012 and subsequent fiscal years
from $16.61 to $31.32 per ton of
assessable olives.
The California olive marketing order
provides authority for the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are producers and
handlers of California olives. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2011 and subsequent fiscal
years, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from fiscal
year to fiscal year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on December 15,
2011, and unanimously recommended
2012 expenditures of $1,197,291 and an
assessment rate of $31.32 per ton of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
assessable olives. Olives are an alternate
year bearing crop. Olive growers and
handlers are accustomed to wide swings
in crop yields and assessments from
year to year. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $2,203,909.
The assessment rate of $31.32 is $14.71
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The Committee recommended the
higher assessment rate because of a
substantial decrease in the assessable
olive volume for the 2012 fiscal year.
The olive volume available for fiscal
year 2011 as reported by the California
Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) is
26,944 tons, which compares to 167,000
tons reported for the 2010 fiscal year.
The reduced crop is due to olives being
an alternate year bearing fruit. The
Committee also plans to use available
reserve funds to help meet its 2012
expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2012 fiscal year include $333,791 for
research, $480,000 for marketing
activities, $50,000 for inspection
equipment development, and $333,500
for administration. Budgeted expenses
for these items in 2011 were $1,093,009,
$700,000, $75,000 and $335,900,
respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by
considering anticipated fiscal year
expenses, actual olive tonnage received
by handlers during the 2011 crop year,
and additional pertinent factors. Actual
assessable tonnage for the 2012 fiscal
year is expected to be lower than the
2011 crop receipts of 167,000 tons
reported by the CASS because some
olives may be diverted by handlers to
uses that are exempt from marketing
order requirements. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with
interest income and funds from the
Committee’s authorized reserve would
be adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
Funds in the reserve will be kept within
the maximum permitted by the order of
approximately one fiscal year’s
expenses (§ 932.40).
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2012 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal years will be reviewed
and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,000
producers of olives in the production
area and 2 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,000,000.
Based upon information from the
industry and CASS, the average grower
price for 2011 was approximately $798
per ton and total grower production was
around 26,944 tons. Based on
production, producer prices, and the
total number of California olive
producers, the average annual producer
revenue is less than $750,000. Thus, the
majority of olive producers may be
classified as small entities. Both of the
handlers may be classified as large
entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2012 and
subsequent fiscal years from $16.61 to
$31.32 per ton of assessable olives. The
Committee unanimously recommended
2012 expenditures of $1,197,291 and an
assessment rate of $31.32 per ton. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
higher assessment rate is necessary
because assessable olive receipts for the
2012 fiscal year were reported by the
CASS to be 26,944 tons, compared to
167,000 tons for the 2011 fiscal year.
Actual assessable tonnage for the 2012
fiscal year is expected to be lower
because some of the receipts may be
diverted by handlers to exempt outlets
on which assessments are not paid.
Income derived from the $31.32 per ton
assessment rate along with funds from
the authorized reserve and interest
income should be adequate to meet this
year’s expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2012 fiscal year include $333,791 for
research, $480,000 for marketing
activities, $50,000 for inspection
equipment development, and $333,500
for administration. Budgeted expenses
for these items in 2011 were $1,093,009,
$700,000, $75,000 and $335,900,
respectively. The Committee
recommended decreases in all major
expense categories due to the huge
decrease in assessable crop volume as
reported by the CASS.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from
various sources, such as the
Committee’s Executive, Marketing,
Inspection, and Research
Subcommittees. Alternate expenditure
levels were discussed by these groups,
based upon the relative value of various
projects to the olive industry and the
reduced olive production. The
assessment rate of $31.32 per ton of
assessable olives was derived by
considering anticipated expenses, the
volume of assessable olives, and
additional pertinent factors.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming fiscal year indicates that
grower price could range between
approximately $1,000 per ton and
$1,200 per ton of olives. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2012 fiscal year as a percentage of total
grower revenue could range between 2.6
and 3.1 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California’s olive industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51685
Like all Committee meetings, the
December 15, 2011, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they will be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California olive
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 5, 2012 (77 FR 33104).
Copies of the proposed rule were also
mailed or sent via facsimile to all olive
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period
ending July 5, 2012, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously-mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
51686
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because
handlers have already received the 2012
fiscal year olive crop from growers, the
fiscal year began January 1, 2012, and
the assessment rate applies to all
California olives handled during the
2012 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal
years. Further, handlers are aware of
this rule which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Olives, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is amended as
follows:
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 932 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 932.230
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2012, an
assessment rate of $31.32 per ton is
established for California olives.
Dated: August 21, 2012.
Ruihong Guo,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–21036 Filed 8–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 999
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0064; FV09–999–1
FR]
Specialty Crops; Import Regulations;
New Pistachio Import Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule establishes a
minimum quality regulation for lots of
pistachios imported into the United
States. The regulation specifies
maximum aflatoxin tolerance levels as
well as mandatory aflatoxin testing and
certification requirements. These import
quality requirements are the same as or
comparable to those in effect for the
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
domestically produced commodity.
Under this regulation, aflatoxin levels in
imported pistachios may not exceed 15
parts per billion (ppb), as certified by
aflatoxin inspection certificates issued
by an accredited laboratory. This action
is intended to assure consumers that all
pistachios offered for sale in the United
States meet the same aflatoxin
standards, thus promoting high quality
product in the market place and
fostering consumer satisfaction.
DATES: Effective Date: September 26,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel May or Kathleen Finn, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email: Laurel.May@ams.
usda.gov or Kathy.Finn@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May at
the above mentioned address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’
which provides that whenever the
grade, size, quality, or maturity of
certain specified commodities,
including pistachios, are regulated
under a Federal marketing order,
imports of these commodities into the
United States are prohibited unless they
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements
as those in effect for the domestically
produced commodities. To ensure that
these requirements are met, the Act also
authorizes the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to perform
inspections and related functions such
as commodity sampling, and to issue
inspection certificates for such imported
commodities.
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
There are no administrative
procedures that must be exhausted prior
to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of import regulations issued
under section 8e of the Act.
This final rule adds a new § 999.600
under 7 CFR part 999—Specialty Crops;
Import Regulations, and establishes
quality requirements for maximum
aflatoxin tolerance levels and
mandatory testing and certification
requirements for pistachios offered for
importation into the United States.
These quality requirements for imported
pistachios are the same as or
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comparable to those established for
pistachios grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 983 (7 CFR
part 983) (order), both as amended.
This final rule also revises § 999.500,
which specifies safeguard procedures
for the importation of walnuts and dates
that are exempt from § 8e regulations.
This section is revised to include
safeguard procedures for the
importation of pistachios intended for
exempted purposes.
The order prohibits the shipping of
pistachios for domestic human
consumption that do not meet the
quality requirements for aflatoxin levels
in the nuts. Such quality requirements
specify that aflatoxin levels may not
exceed the maximum tolerance of 15
ppb. Pistachios that fail to meet these
requirements must be reworked and
retested, or disposed of as specified in
the order. This regulation was designed
to ensure that only high quality
pistachios containing low levels of
aflatoxin are shipped, thus promoting
high quality product in the market place
and fostering consumer satisfaction.
The order, which was established for
California pistachios in 2004, was
recently amended to include the states
of Arizona and New Mexico. Pistachios
grown in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico represent over 99 percent of the
U.S. domestic production, and 98
percent of the domestic consumption.
Thus, almost all domestically produced
pistachios are regulated under
Marketing Order No. 983. There is no
other Federal marketing order in effect
for pistachios produced in the United
States.
According to USDA’s Foreign
Agricultural Service (FAS), Iran is
typically the world’s largest pistachio
producer, followed by the U.S. and
Turkey, although Syria’s production has
increased in recent years. During the
three most recent crop years (September
through August) for which complete
data is available, 2007–08 through
2009–10, the production averages in
millions of pounds (inshell basis) for
Iran, the U.S., Turkey, and Syria were
approximately 386, 350, 120, and 141,
respectively.
Historically, the bulk of U.S. pistachio
imports have come from Turkey and
Iran, although Iranian imports have
been prohibited since July 2010. The
remainder comes from other countries,
including Italy, China, Switzerland,
France, Australia, Hong Kong, and
Israel. Imported pistachios may be
inshell or shelled. According to FAS,
the U.S. imported an average of
approximately 1.7 million pounds of
pistachios (inshell basis) annually
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51684-51686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21036]
[[Page 51684]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0093; FV12-932-1 FR]
Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
California Olive Committee (Committee) for 2012 and subsequent fiscal
years from $16.61 to $31.32 per assessable ton of olives handled. The
Committee locally administers the marketing order which regulates the
handling of olives grown in California. Assessments upon olive handlers
are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The fiscal year began January 1 and ends December 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: August 28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist
or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 148 and Order No. 932, both as amended (7 CFR part 932),
regulating the handling of olives grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
olive handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
olives beginning on January 1, 2012, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2012 and subsequent fiscal years from $16.61 to
$31.32 per ton of assessable olives.
The California olive marketing order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
California olives. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and
with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus
in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate.
The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate
and provide input.
For the 2011 and subsequent fiscal years, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from fiscal year to fiscal year unless modified, suspended,
or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by
the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on December 15, 2011, and unanimously recommended
2012 expenditures of $1,197,291 and an assessment rate of $31.32 per
ton of assessable olives. Olives are an alternate year bearing crop.
Olive growers and handlers are accustomed to wide swings in crop yields
and assessments from year to year. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $2,203,909. The assessment rate of $31.32 is $14.71
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The Committee recommended the higher assessment rate because of a
substantial decrease in the assessable olive volume for the 2012 fiscal
year. The olive volume available for fiscal year 2011 as reported by
the California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) is 26,944 tons,
which compares to 167,000 tons reported for the 2010 fiscal year. The
reduced crop is due to olives being an alternate year bearing fruit.
The Committee also plans to use available reserve funds to help meet
its 2012 expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2012
fiscal year include $333,791 for research, $480,000 for marketing
activities, $50,000 for inspection equipment development, and $333,500
for administration. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2011 were
$1,093,009, $700,000, $75,000 and $335,900, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
considering anticipated fiscal year expenses, actual olive tonnage
received by handlers during the 2011 crop year, and additional
pertinent factors. Actual assessable tonnage for the 2012 fiscal year
is expected to be lower than the 2011 crop receipts of 167,000 tons
reported by the CASS because some olives may be diverted by handlers to
uses that are exempt from marketing order requirements. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the
Committee's authorized reserve would be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept within the maximum
permitted by the order of approximately one fiscal year's expenses
(Sec. 932.40).
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and
[[Page 51685]]
consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee
or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate
Committee recommendations and other available information to determine
whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2012 budget
and those for subsequent fiscal years will be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,000 producers of olives in the production
area and 2 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order.
Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts less
than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000.
Based upon information from the industry and CASS, the average
grower price for 2011 was approximately $798 per ton and total grower
production was around 26,944 tons. Based on production, producer
prices, and the total number of California olive producers, the average
annual producer revenue is less than $750,000. Thus, the majority of
olive producers may be classified as small entities. Both of the
handlers may be classified as large entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2012 and subsequent
fiscal years from $16.61 to $31.32 per ton of assessable olives. The
Committee unanimously recommended 2012 expenditures of $1,197,291 and
an assessment rate of $31.32 per ton. The higher assessment rate is
necessary because assessable olive receipts for the 2012 fiscal year
were reported by the CASS to be 26,944 tons, compared to 167,000 tons
for the 2011 fiscal year. Actual assessable tonnage for the 2012 fiscal
year is expected to be lower because some of the receipts may be
diverted by handlers to exempt outlets on which assessments are not
paid. Income derived from the $31.32 per ton assessment rate along with
funds from the authorized reserve and interest income should be
adequate to meet this year's expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2012
fiscal year include $333,791 for research, $480,000 for marketing
activities, $50,000 for inspection equipment development, and $333,500
for administration. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2011 were
$1,093,009, $700,000, $75,000 and $335,900, respectively. The Committee
recommended decreases in all major expense categories due to the huge
decrease in assessable crop volume as reported by the CASS.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the Committee considered
information from various sources, such as the Committee's Executive,
Marketing, Inspection, and Research Subcommittees. Alternate
expenditure levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the
relative value of various projects to the olive industry and the
reduced olive production. The assessment rate of $31.32 per ton of
assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the
volume of assessable olives, and additional pertinent factors.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming fiscal year indicates that grower price
could range between approximately $1,000 per ton and $1,200 per ton of
olives. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for the 2012 fiscal
year as a percentage of total grower revenue could range between 2.6
and 3.1 percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
are offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing
order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California's olive industry and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the December
15, 2011, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178. No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they will be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California olive handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on June 5, 2012 (77 FR 33104). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all olive handlers. Finally,
the proposal was made available through the Internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period ending July 5,
2012, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal.
No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously-
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists
[[Page 51686]]
for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because handlers have already
received the 2012 fiscal year olive crop from growers, the fiscal year
began January 1, 2012, and the assessment rate applies to all
California olives handled during the 2012 fiscal year and subsequent
fiscal years. Further, handlers are aware of this rule which was
recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment period was
provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Olives, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is
amended as follows:
PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 932.230 Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2012, an assessment rate of $31.32 per ton
is established for California olives.
Dated: August 21, 2012.
Ruihong Guo,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-21036 Filed 8-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P