Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the Receivership of 10339, Badger State Bank, Cassville, WI, 51800-51801 [2012-20986]
Download as PDF
51800
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
109(d) of the CAA requires periodic
review and, if appropriate, revision of
existing air quality criteria. The revised
air quality criteria reflect advances in
scientific knowledge on the effects of
the pollutant on public health or
welfare. The EPA is also required to
periodically review and revise the
NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the
revised criteria.1 A draft of the
integrated review plan was released for
public review and comment in
September 2009 and was the subject of
a consultation with the Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
on November 13, 2009 (74 FR 54562;
October 22, 2009).2 Comments received
from that consultation and from the
public were considered in finalizing the
plan and in beginning the review of the
air quality criteria.
As part of EPA’s review of the
primary and secondary ozone (O3)
NAAQS,3 the Agency is conducting
quantitative assessments characterizing
the health and welfare risks associated
with exposure to ambient O3. The EPA’s
plans for conducting these assessments,
including the proposed scope and
methods of the analyses, were presented
in two planning documents titled,
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards: Scope and Methods Plan for
Health Risk and Exposure Assessment
and Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards: Scope and Methods
Plan for Welfare Risk and Exposure
Assessment (henceforth, Scope and
Methods Plans).4 These documents were
released for public comment in April
2011, and were the subject of a
consultation with the CASAC on May
19–20, 2011 (76 FR 23809; April 28,
2011). In May 2012, a memo titled,
Updates to information presented in the
Scope and Methods Plans for the Ozone
NAAQS Health and Welfare Risk and
Exposure Assessments, was made
available that described changes to
elements of the scope and methods
plans and provided a brief explanation
of each change and the reason for it.
On July 16, 2012 EPA made available
the first draft documents Health Risk
and Exposure Assessment for Ozone,
First External Review Draft and Welfare
Risk and Exposure Assessment for
1 See https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/review.html
for more information on the NAAQS review
process.
2 See https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/
WebProjectsbyTopicCASAC!OpenView for more
information on CASAC activities related to the
current O3 NAAQS review.
3 See https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/review.html
for more information on the NAAQS review
process.
4 EPA–452/P–11–001 and –002; April 2011;
Available: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/
standards/ozone/s_o3_2008_pd.html
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Ozone, First External Review Draft. At
that time, we noted that Chapter 6 of the
Health Risk and Exposure Assessment
(REA) and quantitative results of
ecosystem services modeling in Chapter
6 of the Welfare REA would be made
available in a separate submission in
August, 2012.
On August 15, EPA made available
updates to the first draft Health and
Welfare REAs, along with several
technical memos and appendices.
Updates to the Health REA include
Chapter 6 which describes risk analyses
based on application of results from
human clinical studies, an updated
Chapter 9 which incorporates the
findings from Chapter 6, and several
corrections to other chapters, including
corrected table numbers in Chapter 5,
and corrected references in several
locations. Updates to the Welfare REA
include additional analyses described in
Chapter 6 which provide estimates of
damages from O3 exposure to ecosystem
services related to commercial forests
and urban trees, additional discussions
in Chapter 7 related to the ecosystem
service analyses in the revised Chapter
6, as well as corrections to maps in
Chapter 4 and corrected references in
several locations.
In addition, on August 15, 2012 EPA
made available the first draft document
titled Policy Assessment for the Review
of the Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards: First External
Review Draft. When final, the Policy
Assessment will serve to ‘‘bridge the
gap’’ between the scientific information
and the judgments required of the
Administrator in determining whether it
is appropriate to retain or revise the
standards. The first draft Policy
Assessment builds upon information
presented in the Integrated Science
Assessment of Ozone and Related
Photochemical Oxidants (Third draft) 5
and the two draft Risk and Exposure
Assessment documents described above.
The first draft Policy Assessment may
be accessed online through EPA’s TTN
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/
naaqs/standards/ozone/
s_o3_index.html.
The EPA is soliciting advice and
recommendations from the CASAC by
means of a review of these draft
documents at an upcoming public
meeting of the CASAC that will be held
September 11–13, 2012. Information
about these public meetings, including
the dates and locations, was published
5 U.S. EPA. Integrated Science Assessment of
Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (Third
External Review Draft). U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R–
10/076C, 2012; Available: https://cfpub.epa.gov/
ncea/isa/recordisplay.cfm?deid=242490#Download.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in a separate notice in the Federal
Register (77 FR 46755). The EPA is also
soliciting comments from the public on
these draft documents. Following the
CASAC meeting and the close of the
public comment period, EPA will
consider comments received from the
CASAC and the public in preparing
revisions to these documents.
The draft documents briefly described
above do not represent and should not
be construed to represent any final EPA
policy, viewpoint, or determination.
The EPA will consider any public
comments submitted in response to this
notice when revising the documents.
Dated: August 20, 2012.
Mary Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2012–21034 Filed 8–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Notice to All Interested Parties of the
Termination of the Receivership of
10339, Badger State Bank, Cassville,
WI
Notice is hereby given that the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’)
as Receiver for Badger State Bank,
Cassville, Wisconsin (‘‘the Receiver’’)
intends to terminate its receivership for
said institution. The FDIC was
appointed receiver of Badger State Bank.
The liquidation of the receivership
assets has been completed. To the extent
permitted by available funds and in
accordance with law, the Receiver will
be making a final dividend payment to
proven creditors.
Based upon the foregoing, the
Receiver has determined that the
continued existence of the receivership
will serve no useful purpose.
Consequently, notice is given that the
receivership shall be terminated, to be
effective no sooner than thirty days after
the date of this Notice. If any person
wishes to comment concerning the
termination of the receivership, such
comment must be made in writing and
sent within thirty days of the date of
this Notice to: Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Division of
Resolutions and Receiverships,
Attention: Receivership Oversight
Department 32.1, 1601 Bryan Street,
Dallas, TX 75201.
No comments concerning the
termination of this receivership will be
considered which are not sent within
this time frame.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Notices
Dated: August 22, 2012.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–20986 Filed 8–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Controlled Carriers Under the Shipping
Act of 1984
August 22, 2012.
Federal Maritime Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Maritime
Commission is publishing an updated
list of controlled carriers, i.e., ocean
common carriers operating in U.S.foreign trades that are owned or
controlled by foreign governments. Such
carriers are subject to special regulatory
oversight by the Commission under the
Shipping Act of 1984.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca A. Fenneman, General Counsel,
Federal Maritime Commission, 800
North Capitol Street NW., Washington,
DC 20573, (202) 523–5740.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Maritime Commission is
publishing an updated list of controlled
carriers. Section 3(8) of the Shipping
Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40102(8)), defines
a ‘‘controlled carrier’’ as:
An ocean common carrier that is, or
whose operating assets are, directly or
indirectly, owned or controlled by a
government, with ownership or control
by a government being deemed to exist
for a carrier if—
(A) A majority of the interest in the
carrier is owned or controlled in any
manner by that government, an agency
of that government, or a public or
private person controlled by that
government; or
(B) That government has the right to
appoint or disapprove the appointment
of a majority of the directors, the chief
operating officer, or the chief executive
officer of the carrier.
As required by the Shipping Act,
controlled carriers are subject to special
oversight by the Commission. Section
9(a) of the Shipping Act (46 U.S.C.
40701(b)), states:
The Federal Maritime Commission, at
any time after notice and opportunity
for a hearing, may prohibit the
publication or use of a rate, charge,
classification, rule, or regulation that a
controlled carrier has failed to
demonstrate is just and reasonable.
Congress enacted these protections to
ensure that controlled carries, whose
marketplace decision-making can be
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
influenced by foreign governmental
priorities or by their access to nonmarket sources of capital, do not engage
in unreasonable below-market pricing
practices which could disrupt trade or
harm privately-owned shipping
companies.
The controlled carrier list is not a
comprehensive list of foreign-owned or
-controlled ships or ship owners; rather,
it is only a list of ocean common carriers
that are controlled by governments. See
46 U.S.C. 40102(8). Thus, tramp
operators and other non-common
carriers are not included, nor are nonvessel-operating common carriers,
regardless of their ownership or control.
Since the last publication of this list
on May 10, 2005 (70 FR 24581), the
Commission has newly classified one
ocean common carrier as a controlled
carrier, Hainan P O Shipping Co., Ltd.
(‘‘P O Shipping’’), and removed four
common carriers from the controlled
carrier list: Ceylon Shipping
Corporation (‘‘Ceylon’’); Compagnie
Nationale Algerienne de Navigation
(‘‘CNAN’’); Sinotrans Container Lines
Co., Ltd. (d/b/a Sinolines) (‘‘Sinotrans’’);
and The Shipping Corporation of India
Ltd. (‘‘SCI’’).
Pursuant to 46 CFR 501.23, P O
Shipping was classified as a controlled
carrier on July 23, 2010.
As part of a general review of
common carriers subject to regulation
by the Commission, Ceylon was
determined to be inactive as of March
20, 2012. See 76 FR 70448; FMC Docket
No. 11–20 Publication of Inaccurate or
Inactive Ocean Common Carrier Tariffs.
CNAN has also been removed from
the list, as it no longer operates as an
ocean common carrier. All CNAN tariffs
in U.S.-foreign trades were cancelled
effective February 24, 2011.
Sinotrans is being removed from the
list, as it no longer operates as an ocean
common carrier in the U.S.-foreign
trades, although a related company
operates as a non-vessel-operating
common carriers (‘‘NVOCC’’) in the
U.S.-foreign trades.
SCI is also being removed from the
list as it no longer does business in the
U.S.-foreign trades. All SCI tariffs in
U.S.-foreign trades were cancelled
effective February 21, 2011.
China Shipping Container Lines Co.,
Ltd. and China Shipping Container
Lines (Hong Kong) Company, Ltd. are
now a single organization (RPI No.
019270).
It is requested that any other
information regarding possible
omissions or inaccuracies in this list be
provided to the Commission’s Office of
General Counsel. See 46 CFR 501.23.
The amended list of currently classified
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51801
controlled carriers and their
corresponding Commission-issued
Registered Persons Index numbers is set
forth below:
(1) American President Lines, Ltd and
APL Co., Pte. (RPI No. 000240)—
Republic of Singapore;
(2) COSCO Container Lines Company,
Limited (RPI No. 015614)—People’s
Republic of China;
(3) China Shipping Container Lines
Co., Ltd and China Shipping Container
Lines (Hong Kong) Co., Limited (RPI No.
019270)—People’s Republic of China;
(4) Hainan P O Shipping Co., Ltd. (RPI
No. 022860)—People’s Republic of
China.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–21009 Filed 8–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 101 0079]
Cooperativa de Farmacias
Puertorriquenas; Analysis of
Agreement Containing Consent Order
to Aid Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed Consent Agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before September 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Coopharma, File No. 101
0079’’ on your comment, and file your
comment online at https://ftcpublic.
commentworks.com/ftc/
coopharmaconsentument, by following
the instructions on the web-based form.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randall Marks (202–326–2571), FTC,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51800-51801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20986]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the
Receivership of 10339, Badger State Bank, Cassville, WI
Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for Badger State Bank, Cassville,
Wisconsin (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for
said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of Badger State Bank.
The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the
extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the
Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose.
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be
considered which are not sent within this time frame.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[[Page 51801]]
Dated: August 22, 2012.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-20986 Filed 8-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P