Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, New River Gorge National River, Bicycle Routes, 51733-51739 [2012-20898]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
for youth ATVs—user acceptance and
user abilities; Physical sizing of ATVs
2. Consumer Awareness
• Suggested topics: Point-of-purchase
information; on-product warning
labels and hang tags
ATV Innovations Topic Areas
1. State Legislation: Effecting Change
• Suggested topics: How to effect
change; what works, what doesn’t?
Successes and failures with other
outdoor products
2. ATV Training: Reaching the Next
Generation
• Suggested topics: Increasing
availability; using new technology;
what works, what doesn’t?
3. Public Awareness, Information, and
Education: Speaking With One Voice
• Suggested topics: What works, what
doesn’t? Cultural and social media
challenges to promoting safe riding
4. Vehicle Technology Innovations
• Suggested topics: Any new
innovation—from the proof-ofconcept stage or current in-use on
ATVs—to advances in the area of
lateral stability and rollover
protection.
It is difficult to anticipate the number
of panelists who will be available for
each topic area. Therefore, we have not
yet determined the order of the panel
sessions. We may combine, expand, or
eliminate panel sessions depending on
the level of interest. The final schedule
will be announced on our Web site by
September 28, 2012.
IV. Details Regarding the Summit
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
A. When and where will the summit be
held?
The Summit will be held from 9:00
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on October 11–12,
2012, at the CPSC Headquarters
building at 4330 East West Highway, 4th
Floor Hearing Room, Bethesda, MD
20814.
B. How do you register for the summit?
If you would like to be a panelist for
a specific session of the Summit, you
should register by September 14, 2012.
(See the ADDRESSES portion of this
document for the Web site link and
instructions on where to register.) We
also ask that you submit a brief (less
than 200 word) abstract of your topic,
area of expertise, and desired breakout
panel. In the event that more panelists
request a particular session than time
will allow, staff will select panelists
based on considerations such as:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Whether the information to be presented
has been received in previous open
comment periods; what is the
individual’s familiarity or expertise
with the topic to be discussed; is there
practical utility in the information to be
presented; what is the topic’s relevance
to the identified theme and topic area;
what is the individual’s viewpoint or
ability to represent certain interests
(e.g., such as large manufacturers, small
manufacturers, academic researchers,
consumer organizations). While an
effort will be made to accommodate all
persons who wish to be panelists, we
expect to limit each panel session to no
more than five panelists. Therefore, the
final number of panelists may be
limited. We recommend that
individuals and organizations with
common interests consolidate or
coordinate their panel requests. To
assist in making final panelist
selections, staff may request potential
panelists to submit planned
presentations in addition to the initial
abstract. We will notify selected
panelists by September 21, 2012.
If you wish to attend and participate
in the Summit, but you do not wish to
be a panelist, you should also register by
October 5, 2012, and identify your
affiliation. Every effort will be made to
accommodate each person’s request;
however, we may need to limit
registration to meet the occupant
capacity of our meeting rooms. If you
are unable to attend the Summit, it will
be available through a webcast, but you
will not be able to interact with the
panels and presenters, nor will every
panel session be available. You do not
need to register for the webcast. The
panels that are not webcast will be
taped and made available for viewing on
the CPSC Web site.
If you wish to submit written
comments for any reason, you may do
so before or after the Summit by any of
the methods stated in the ADDRESSES
portion of this notice. These comments
should be received by November 14,
2012. Comments should focus on new
information that was not submitted
previously that is related to the topic
areas listed above.
C. What will be the format of the
summit?
The Summit will open with a plenary
session that includes a brief overview of
the Commission’s past activities on
ATVs. Following that, there will be a
series of panels covering the topics
listed above. Each panel session will
consist of stakeholders and members of
the public and will be moderated by
CPSC staff. We expect potential
panelists to speak for approximately 10
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51733
minutes each about their topic area. At
the conclusion of the panel’s
presentations, there will be a question,
answer, and discussion session among
the panelists and the audience,
centering on the topics discussed by the
panelists. Each panel session will be
approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes.
For the topics not related to
rulemaking activities, a CPSC moderator
will work with the group to help
identify common goals, possible
solutions, and actions each stakeholder
can take, independent of any action,
effort, or funding from the CPSC. We are
not soliciting or accepting any advice
from the group as a whole; instead, we
are seeking to encourage the
stakeholders to find common ground to
move forward.
For the topic areas related to our
rulemaking effort, a CPSC staff member
will moderate the panel session to focus
the discussion on our open rulemaking
topics. We are seeking new information
that may be used to inform our
rulemaking.
All attendees will be given the
opportunity to ask questions and make
comments during the panel session. At
the close of the afternoon session, all
groups will join for a plenary session,
during which the groups will report on
the results of their discussions.
D. What happens if few people register
for the summit?
If fewer than 15 panelists or less than
30 participants register for the Summit,
we may cancel the Summit. If we decide
to cancel the Summit for this or any
other reason, we will post a cancellation
notice on the registration Web page for
the Summit and send an email to all
registered participants who provide
their email address when they register.
Dated: August 22, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–21011 Filed 8–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS–NERI–09778; 4785–LZY]
RIN 1024–AD95
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System, New River
Gorge National River, Bicycle Routes
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
National Park Service, Interior.
27AUP1
51734
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule.
The National Park Service
proposes to designate new and existing
multi-use trails and administrative
roads within the New River Gorge
National River as bicycle routes. The
rule is necessary because the National
Park Service general regulation requires
publication of a special regulation to
designate routes for bicycle use when
such use will be outside of developed
areas and special use zones.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) 1024–AD95, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or hand deliver to: Don Striker,
Superintendent, Attn: Bicycle
Regulation, New River Gorge National
River, P.O. Box 246, Glen Jean, WV
25846–0246.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Fields, Outdoor Recreation
Planner, New River Gorge National
River, P.O. Box 246 (104 Main St), Glen
Jean, WV 25846, (304) 465–6527,
Jamie_Fields@nps.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Administrative Background
The New River Gorge National River
(NERI or park), a unit of the National
Park System located in West Virginia,
encompasses approximately 72,000
acres within a 53-mile corridor along
the New River, extending from Hawks
Nest State Park to Hinton. Congress
directed the establishment of NERI as a
unit of the National Park System, largely
in response to a 20-year grassroots effort
organized by local community leaders.
In 1978, President Jimmy Carter signed
legislation establishing the park, ‘‘for
the purpose of conserving and
interpreting outstanding natural, scenic,
and historic values and objects in and
around the New River Gorge and
preserving as a free-flowing stream an
important segment of the New River in
West Virginia for the benefit and
enjoyment of present and future
generations.’’ Public Law 95–625, sec.
1101, 1978. Subsequent legislation
concerning the park states in its findings
that NERI ‘‘has provided the basis for
increased recreation and tourism
activities in southern West Virginia due
to its nationally recognized status and
has greatly contributed to the regional
economy.’’ Public Law 100–534, sec.
2(a)(1)–(2), 1988.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
The park’s 1982 General Management
Plan (1982 GMP) anticipated
accommodating an expanding array of
recreational pursuits, including off-road
bicycling. It states that ‘‘[l]evels of use
of new or unusual forms of recreation
(such as hang gliding, rock climbing,
dirt bicycling) will be managed to avoid
problems of visitor safety, conflicts
between uses, or resource impacts.’’
Page 18.
The 1982 GMP also anticipated trail
construction as funding became
available. A subsequent park-wide Trail
Development Plan (1993) recommended
that the park develop a trail system
emphasizing multiple uses, including
hiking and bicycling. Both of these
plans can be viewed by going to the
NERI park planning Web site, https://
www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/
planning.htm, then following this path:
click the link for ‘‘Environmental
Assessment: Design and Build Two
Stacked Loop Hiking and Biking Trail
Systems * * *;’’ click the link to the
Document List on the left; click the link
to either the ‘‘1982 NERI General
Management Plan’’ or the ‘‘1993 NERI
Trail Development Plan;’’ then
download the documents on their
respective pages.
The park began developing a new,
updated general management plan in
2005 to respond to changes in park
boundaries, land acquisitions, and park
and public needs and priorities that had
occurred since the 1982 GMP was
approved. As a component of this
process, and based upon an analysis of
the park’s enabling legislation and
subsequent amendments, administrative
history, resources, values and
opportunities, NERI staff developed a
Foundation Plan that determined that a
major purpose of the park is to ‘‘provide
opportunities for public understanding,
appreciation and enjoyment of the
park’s natural, cultural, scenic and
recreational resources and values.’’ Page
5. As stated in the Foundation Plan, two
major reasons that NERI is significant
enough to have been designated as a
unit of the National Park System are its
‘‘diverse and extraordinary scenic
resources and views accessible to
visitors from the river, rocky overlooks,
trails and rural roads throughout the
park, and its exceptional opportunities
for exploration, adventure, discovery,
solitude and community.’’ Page 6. Other
purpose and significance statements
that highlight the park’s natural and
cultural resources can be found in the
Foundation Plan, which can be viewed
by going to the NERI park planning Web
site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/
parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following
this path: click the link for ‘‘General
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Management Plan;’’ click the link to the
Document List on the left; click the link
to the ‘‘Draft General Management Plan
and EIS/Draft Foundation Plan;’’ then
download the document entitled ‘‘Draft
Foundation Plan’’ at the bottom of the
page (corrections to the Foundation Plan
are located in the ‘‘Abbreviated Final
General Management Plan * * *,’’ also
in the Document List).
The park’s updated 2010/2011 GMP
and Environmental Impact Statement
(2010/2011 GMP/EIS) process revealed
substantial and consistent public
support for designating routes in the
park as bicycle trails during public
scoping (February 2004 through October
2007) and public comment (January 13,
2010 through April 16, 2010).
The 2010/2011 GMP/EIS proposed
that, after promulgation of the required
special regulations and proper
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
bicycle use would be an appropriate use
on new and existing trails. This would
include bicycle use in frontcountry
zones, in backcountry zones on single
track trails, and on a limited basis on a
variety of trail types in historic resource,
river corridor, and park development
zones. The Record of Decision (ROD) for
the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS was signed, and
the Notice of Availability was published
in the Federal Register (77 FR 12877,
March 2, 2012). The 2010/2011 GMP/
EIS can be viewed by going to the NERI
park planning Web site, https://
www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/
planning.htm, then following this path:
click the link for ‘‘General Management
Plan;’’ click the link to the Document
List on the left; click the link to the
‘‘Draft General Management Plan and
EIS/Draft Foundation Plan;’’ then
download the documents at the bottom
of the page (corrections to the 2010/
2011 GMP/EIS are located in the
‘‘Abbreviated Final General
Management Plan * * *,’’ also in the
Document List).
As a result of the public support for
bicycle use expressed early in the 2010/
2011 GMP/EIS process, the park
developed an Environmental
Assessment (Trails EA) to evaluate the
impact of the construction of new trails
and designation of new and existing
park trails as routes for bicycle use.
Public scoping for the Trails EA, which
occurred from November 10, 2009 until
January 15, 2010 (with a public focus
group on November 10, 2009 and a
public open house on December 8,
2009), confirmed there was
overwhelming support for bicycle use
on trails. Only one of approximately 400
scoping comments from residents of 32
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
27AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
states was opposed to bicycle use at
NERI.
Trail Terminology
The following trail terminology is
used in the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS, the
Trails EA, and the proposed rule:
• Park administrative roads generally
have one-lane (two-track) dirt and gravel
surfaces and are open only to National
Park Service (NPS) authorized vehicle
use. Public access is limited to hiking,
in some cases bicycle use, and in a few
cases equestrian use.
• Frontcountry trails, located in and
near developed areas, have a maximum
width of 30 to 36 inches and
accommodate moderate use by a range
of users (including hikers and
bicyclists).
• Backcountry trails in remote areas
do not exceed 18 to 24 inches in width
and are designed for low use by
experienced hikers and, in limited
cases, bicyclists.
• Stacked loop trail systems are
designed to have interconnected loops
of trails, often having a variety of
degrees of difficulty, that provide trail
users options for varied distances,
routes and destinations.
• Connector trails connect
destinations or other trails to one
another. Also, connector trails are
segments of trails that could link
together the ‘Through the Park Trail,’ as
proposed in the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS.
Currently, only some segments of the
future ‘Through the Park Trail’ have
been established.
• The term branch is synonymous
with ‘‘creek.’’ For example, Panther
Branch is a creek that is a tributary of
the New River.
• The difficulty of negotiating various
trail sections in the two stacked loop
trail systems is described in the Trails
EA by designations of Easiest, More
Difficult, and Most Difficult. The Trails
EA anticipates that these descriptions
will be applied to all other bike trails in
the park.
Æ Represented by a green circle, the
easiest trails may be identified as
‘‘Easy’’ on interpretive kiosks and other
publicly available media and are
appropriate for bicyclists of a novice
skill level. Easiest trails have firm
surfaces with few obstacles, average trail
grades of five percent or less, maximum
grades of ten percent or less and are
generally about 30 to 36 inches wide at
the active trail tread.
Æ Represented by a blue square, the
more difficult trails may be designated
as ‘‘Moderate’’ on interpretive kiosks
and other publicly available media and
are trails appropriate for bicyclists of an
intermediate skill level. More difficult
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
trails may include obstacles such as
steps, stairs, and steep, exposed
sections. Average trail grades on more
difficult trails are ten percent or less,
maximum grades are 15 percent or less,
and active tread width is about 20 to 24
inches.
Æ Represented by a black diamond,
the most difficult trails may be
designated as ‘‘Difficult’’ (or sometimes
‘‘Strenuous’’) on interpretive kiosks and
other publicly available media and are
appropriate for bicyclists of an expert
skill level. Most difficult trails include
obstacles such as steps, stairs, and
significantly steep or exposed sections,
have average grades of 15 percent or
less, but can include maximum grades
of 15 percent or more. Active tread
width of most difficult trails is generally
12 to 18 inches.
Alternatives in Trails EA
The Trails EA presented three
alternatives. Alternative A is the No
Action Alternative and provided for the
continuation of current management
practices. Proposals common to both
action alternatives (B and C) provided
for the designation of some existing park
trails and administrative roads as routes
open to bicycle use, and for the
construction and designation of three
new trails for hiking and bicycle use by
converting existing roads no longer used
for vehicle access into the Mud Turn,
Panther Branch Connector and Brooklyn
Miner’s Connector Trails.
Alternative B, the Preferred
Alternative that became the NPS
Selected Alternative, also provided for
the development and construction of
approximately 11 miles of new single
track trail, called the Craig Branch
Stacked Loop Trail System, and the
development and construction of 33
miles of new single track trail, called the
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail
System for hiking and bicycle use.
Alternative C provided for the
development and construction of 4.5
miles of single track trail on existing
informal routes, such as old logging
roads, called the Craig Branch Stacked
Loop Trail System, and the
development and construction of 45
miles of new single track trail, much of
which would also be constructed on
existing informal routes, called the
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail
System for bicycle use.
Of the 50 comments received on the
Trails EA during the public comment
period from January 26, 2011 through
March 4, 2011, only two did not support
the preferred alternative. One of these
comments opposed the new trail
development and did not mention bike
use, and the other comment opposed
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51735
bike use in natural areas, but did not
specifically address NERI. The other 48
comments, most of which came from the
local community of regular park
visitors, supported bicycle use in the
park.
Following public comment, the NPS
selected the preferred alternative B,
including the proposals common to both
action alternatives. The NPS Northeast
Regional Director signed a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) on April
1, 2011. The Trails EA and FONSI can
be viewed by going to the NERI park
planning Web site, https://www.nps.gov/
neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm, then
following this path: click the link for
‘‘Environmental Assessment: Design
and Build Two Stacked Loop Hiking
and Biking Trail Systems * * *;’’ click
the link to the Document List on the left;
click the link to either the
‘‘Environmental Assessment—Design
and Build * * *’’ or the ‘‘Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI);’’ then
download the documents on their
respective pages.
Renaming of Trails
Since the FONSI was signed, several
trail names in the Nuttallburg area of the
park have changed. The Nuttall Mine
Trail (also an administrative road) was
renamed the Headhouse Trail on public
maps. The Nuttallburg Town Connector
Trail was renamed the Nuttallburg
Town Loop Connector Trail. The
Nuttallburg Tipple Trail (also an
administrative road) was broken up on
public maps into the Tipple Trail and
the Seldom Seen Trail. The actual trail/
administrative road on the ground
remains the same as the Nuttallburg
Tipple Trail addressed in the EA and
FONSI. The Keeneys Creek Trail has
been renamed on some public maps and
documents as the Keeneys Creek Rail
Trail, but older materials still call it the
Keeneys Creek Trail.
Since its construction in summer of
2011, the Craig Branch Stacked Loop
Trail System has been renamed the
Arrowhead Trail. The proposed rule and
future park maps will reflect this
change, while prior documents
(primarily the Trails EA and FONSI)
refer to the Craig Branch Stacked Loop
Trail System. Additionally, the Trails
EA and FONSI refer to the stacked loop
trails in the Craig Branch (now
Arrowhead) and Garden Ground areas
as ‘‘trail systems.’’ In the proposed rule,
they are called the ‘‘Arrowhead Trail’’
and the ‘‘Garden Ground Stacked Loop
Trail,’’ and are each treated as
individual trails with interconnected
segments.
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
27AUP1
51736
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Proposed Rule
Following the Trails EA and FONSI,
the proposed rule would authorize
bicycle use on two new stacked loop
trail systems (the Arrowhead Trail and
the Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail
System), three new trails converted from
existing roads that are no longer used
for vehicle access (the Mud Turn,
Panther Branch Connector and Brooklyn
Miner’s Connector Trails), and 19
existing trails and administrative roads
throughout the park. All of the new
trails are approved for construction
through the FONSI, but only the
Arrowhead Trail has been constructed.
Arrowhead and Garden Ground
Stacked Loop Trails
The Arrowhead Trail includes 13
miles of easy and more difficult single
track trail above the rim of the New
River Gorge on rolling, forested terrain.
The trail has been built according to the
frontcountry trail standards outlined in
the park’s 2010/2011 GMP/EIS. The
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail
would include approximately 33 miles
of more difficult and most difficult
single track trail traversing the edge of
the plateau and along the bottom of the
gorge parallel to the New River, with
several challenging rim-to-river
connections on the steep, forested
slopes. The Garden Ground Stacked
Loop Trail segments will be built in
accordance with the backcountry trail
standards outlined in the park’s 2010/
2011 GMP/EIS. Both trail systems will
connect to other existing park trails and
incorporate sustainable design and
construction elements that take multiuse (hike and bike) social and physical
issues into account while also
mitigating the impacts of hiking and
bicycle use. As new trails are
constructed, old logging roads and
recreational vehicle routes on adjacent
lands will be rehabilitated and invasive
plant species will be treated or removed.
Three New Trails Converted From
Roads
The proposed rule would designate
three new trails that would be
constructed by converting existing,
unused roads into single track, multiuse (hike and bike) trails. The Mud Turn
Trail would be located on an abandoned
road that connects the rim at Grandview
to the river along Glade Creek Road by
running along Mill Creek for
approximately 2.75 miles. The Panther
Branch Connector Trail, approximately
three miles long between Glade Creek
and Panther Branch, would be located
on an abandoned state road and on a
short section of old rail bed that was
abandoned in the 1940s. The Brooklyn
Miner’s Connector Trail, less than one
mile long, would be located on
segments of an abandoned coal road
connecting the lower tipple to the upper
mine bench of the Brooklyn Mine area.
These proposed road-to-trail
conversions would be built to the
backcountry trail standards proposed in
the park’s 2010/2011 GMP/EIS and
incorporate the same sustainable design
Trail name
Mi.
and construction principles used in the
Arrowhead Trail.
Designation of Existing Trails and
Administrative Roads for Bicycle Use
The proposed rule would designate 19
existing park trails and administrative
roads, approximately 52 miles in total,
to allow bicycle use. These are
predominantly remnants of roads and
railroad beds existing before the park
was established or before the park had
acquired land within its boundaries.
Created primarily for logging and
mining, some tracks were later
developed or used for recreational
purposes by local people on foot, and by
off-road vehicle, motorcycle or bicycle.
Once the park was established and the
NPS acquired the land, these routes
were adaptively reused as trails and
administrative roads. Additional trails
have since been constructed by NPS,
most notably the Fayetteville Trail
complex, which includes the
backcountry Fayetteville Trail, the Park
Loop, and the Timber Ridge Trail.
Trails To Be Designated for Bicycle Use
The proposed rule would authorize
bicycle use on the routes listed and
described in the tables below. Trails are
labeled as Frontcountry, Backcountry,
or Administrative Road in accordance
with the management zones listed in the
2010/2011 GMP/EIS and the terms
defined in the Trails EA. Trails that are
only partially located on administrative
roads are noted where appropriate.
Existing or new
Trail standard
Proposed Routes for Bicycle Use—Stacked Loop Trails
Arrowhead Trail ..............................................................
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail ...............................
13.0
33.0
New, Constructed
New, Constructed
Frontcountry.
Backcountry.
Proposed Routes for Bicycle Use—Trails Converted From Roads
Mud Turn Trail ................................................................
Panther Branch Connector Trail .....................................
Brooklyn Miner’s Connector Trail ...................................
2.8
3.0
0.8
New .......................
New .......................
New .......................
Backcountry.
Backcountry.
Backcountry.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Proposed Routes for Bicycle Use—Existing Trails and Administrative Roads
Hawks Nest Connector Trail ...........................................
Fayetteville Trail ..............................................................
Park Loop Trail ...............................................................
Timber Ridge Trail ..........................................................
Kaymoor Trail .................................................................
Craig Branch Trail ...........................................................
Long Point Trail (except the last 0.2 mi closest to the
Long Point vista).
Keeneys Creek Rail Trail ................................................
Headhouse Trail .............................................................
Tipple Trail ......................................................................
Seldom Seen Trail ..........................................................
Nuttallburg Town Loop Connector Trail .........................
Brooklyn Mine Trail .........................................................
Southside Trail ................................................................
Rend Trail .......................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
3.5
4.0
1.1
1.0
8.6
2.4
1.4
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
Frontcountry.
Backcountry.
Backcountry.
Backcountry.
Part Frontcountry/Part Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Frontcountry.
3.0
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.3
2.7
7.0
3.4
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Frontcountry.
Administrative Road.
Part Frontcountry/Part Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
27AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Trail name
Mi.
Stone Cliff Trail ...............................................................
Terry Top Trail ................................................................
Little Laurel Trail .............................................................
Glade Creek Trail ...........................................................
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Maps of these designated routes are
available in the office of the
Superintendent and may also be viewed
in the Trails EA, which can be found by
going to the NERI park planning Web
site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/
parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following
this path: click the link for
‘‘Environmental Assessment: Design
and Build Two Stacked Loop Hiking
and Biking Trail Systems * * * ;’’ click
the link to the Document List on the left;
click the link to the ‘‘Environmental
Assessment—Design and Build * * *;’’
then download the document at the
bottom of the page. A park map showing
existing trails and administrative roads
can also be found by downloading the
NERI Trails Guide from the following
Web site: https://www.nps.gov/neri/
planyourvisit/trails-guide.htm.
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders, and Department
Policy Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs) will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This conclusion is
based on the results of a cost/benefit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Existing or new
2.7
1.7
2.6
5.6
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
.................
.................
.................
.................
Trail standard
Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Administrative Road.
Part Frontcountry/Part Administrative Road.
and regulatory flexibility threshold
analysis available for review on the
NERI park planning Web site, https://
www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/
planning.htm. The rule would not
regulate small business. The rule would
likely increase visitation at the park,
which could generate benefits for small
businesses in the local community
through increased spending for goods
and services.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
The July 2011 NPS economic analysis
estimated that the addition of more than
100 miles of new trails will significantly
improve NERI’s attractiveness to
bicyclists and thus drive additional
economic activity.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions. The rule will not
impose restrictions on local businesses
in the form of fees, training,
recordkeeping, or other measures that
would increase costs.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. The
rule addresses public use of national
park lands, and imposes no
requirements on other agencies or
governments. A statement containing
the information required by the UMRA
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of
Executive Order 12630, this rule does
not have significant takings
implications. This rule only designates
bicycle routes and manages bicycle use
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51737
on those routes within the boundaries of
the New River National River. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. This rule only effects use of
NPS administered lands. A Federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and
Department Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it has
no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
tribal consultation policy is not
required.
Throughout numerous past and
current park planning processes, no
expression of affiliation has been
asserted with NERI by any tribal
governments or organizations. Tribes
that could potentially be affiliated were
contacted individually during the
development of the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS
and no response was received. Copies of
the Trails EA were sent to 14 Native
American tribes who were identified as
possibly having some interest in the
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
27AUP1
51738
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
park. The Chief of the Remnant Yuchi
Nation was the only tribal
representative to respond; he indicated
that he was grateful to be acknowledged,
that the NPS should continue the
excellent work, and that he had no
formal questions at this time.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission under the PRA is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
We have prepared environmental
assessments to determine whether this
rule would have a significant impact on
the quality of the human environment
under the NEPA. This rule does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment. A detailed
statement under the NEPA is not
required because the NPS reached a
FONSI for the Selected Alternative. The
Trails EA, the FONSI and other relevant
documents and records of the public
process may be viewed by going to the
NERI park planning Web site, https://
www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1 (b)(12)), 12988 (section
3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and
by the Presidential Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this proposed
rule were Jamie Fields, New River Gorge
National River; Joshua Nadas, NPS
Conservation and Outdoor Recreation
Programs; and Justin Hollimon,
Regulations and Special Park Uses,
National Park Service, Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
NPS proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7
as follows:
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec.
7.96 also issued under DC Code 10–137
(2001) and DC Code 50–2201 (2001).
2. In § 7.89 revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 7.89
New River Gorge National River.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Bicycling (1) Where may I ride a
bicycle within New River Gorge National
River? Bicycle use is permitted on park
roads, in parking areas, and on routes
designated within the park in
accordance with § 4.30 of this chapter.
The following table lists administrative
roads and trails designated for bicycle
use:
ADMINISTRATIVE ROADS AND TRAILS DESIGNATED FOR BICYCLE USE—NORTH TO SOUTH
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Hawks Nest Connector Trail ..............................
Fayetteville Trail .................................................
Park Loop Trail ...................................................
Timber Ridge Trail ..............................................
Kaymoor Trail .....................................................
Craig Branch Trail ..............................................
Arrowhead Trail ..................................................
Long Point Trail (except 0.2 miles closest to
Long Point Vista).
(2) How will I know where the trails
designated for bicycle use are located in
the park? Designated trails are identified
on maps located in the Superintendent’s
office, at interpretive kiosks, and on the
park’s Web site. Trails will also be
posted at trailheads and other
appropriate locations.
(3) What requirements must I meet to
ride a bicycle within New River Gorge
National River? (i) In addition to the
applicable provisions in 36 CFR part 4,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Keeneys Creek Rail Trail .................................
Headhouse Trail ...............................................
Tipple Trail .......................................................
Seldom Seen Trail ...........................................
Nuttallburg Town Loop Connector Trail ...........
Brooklyn Mine Trail ..........................................
Brooklyn Miner’s Connector Trail ....................
Southside Trail .................................................
all bicyclists must yield to other trail
users in the following manner:
(A) A bicyclist must yield to an
equestrian;
(B) A bicyclist must yield to a
pedestrian; and
(C) A bicyclist travelling downhill
must yield to a bicyclist travelling
uphill.
(ii) Yielding the right of way requires
slowing down to a safe speed, being
prepared to stop, establishing
communication, and passing safely.
(iii) Failure to yield is prohibited.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Rend Trail.
Stone Cliff Trail.
Terry Top Trail.
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail.
Little Laurel Trail.
Mud Turn Trail.
Glade Creek Trail.
Panther Branch Connector Trail.
(4) How will the Superintendent
manage the designated bicycle routes?
The Superintendent may open or close
designated bicycle routes, or portions
thereof, or impose conditions or
restrictions for bicycle use after taking
into consideration public health and
safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management
activities and objectives.
(i) The Superintendent will provide
public notice of all such actions through
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
27AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 166 / Monday, August 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
one or more of the methods listed in
§ 1.7 of this chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or
restriction is prohibited.
Dated: August 17, 2012.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012–20898 Filed 8–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–YP–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0786; FRL–9719–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Regional Haze State Implementation
Plan; Best Available Retrofit
Technology for Eastman Chemical
Company
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of
Tennessee, through the Tennessee
Department Environment and
Conservation (TDEC), on May 14, 2012,
related to the Best Available Retrofit
Technology (BART) requirements for
the Eastman Chemical Company
(Eastman). Specifically, the May 14,
2012, SIP revision modifies the
compliance date for the Eastman BART
determination included in Tennessee’s
April 4, 2008, SIP revision and provides
a BART alternative determination
option for Eastman. Together,
Tennessee’s April 4, 2008, and May 14,
2012, SIP revisions address the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) and EPA’s rules that require
states to prevent any future and remedy
any existing anthropogenic impairment
of visibility in mandatory Class I areas
(national parks and wilderness areas)
caused by emissions of air pollutants
from numerous sources located over a
wide geographic area (also referred to as
the ‘‘regional haze program’’). EPA is
proposing to approve Tennessee’s May
14, 2012, SIP revision because it is
consistent with the CAA and EPA’s
regulations on regional haze BART
determinations and BART alternative
determinations.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before September 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Aug 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
OAR–2009–0786, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov.
3. Fax: 404–562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0786,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2009–
0786.’’ EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through www.regulations.
gov or email, information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected. The www.regulations.gov
Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51739
Docket Center homepage at https://www.
epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the www.
regulations.gov index. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michele Notarianni, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Michele
Notarianni can be reached at telephone
number (404) 562–9031 and by
electronic mail at notarianni.michele@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is the background for this proposed
action?
II. What are the requirements for a BART
alternative determination?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of Tennessee’s
May 14, 2012, SIP revision?
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this
proposed action?
On April 4, 2008, TDEC submitted a
revision to Tennessee’s SIP to address
regional haze in mandatory federal Class
I areas within the State and in
mandatory federal Class I areas outside
the State which may be affected by
emissions from within the State. On
June 9, 2011,1 EPA published an action
proposing a limited approval and a
limited disapproval of Tennessee’s
1 On July 26, 2011, EPA reopened the comment
period for EPA’s proposed action related to
Tennessee’s April 4, 2008, SIP revision. See 76 FR
44534.
E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM
27AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51733-51739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20898]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS-NERI-09778; 4785-LZY]
RIN 1024-AD95
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, New River
Gorge National River, Bicycle Routes
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
[[Page 51734]]
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service proposes to designate new and
existing multi-use trails and administrative roads within the New River
Gorge National River as bicycle routes. The rule is necessary because
the National Park Service general regulation requires publication of a
special regulation to designate routes for bicycle use when such use
will be outside of developed areas and special use zones.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) 1024-AD95, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or hand deliver to: Don Striker, Superintendent,
Attn: Bicycle Regulation, New River Gorge National River, P.O. Box 246,
Glen Jean, WV 25846-0246.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Fields, Outdoor Recreation
Planner, New River Gorge National River, P.O. Box 246 (104 Main St),
Glen Jean, WV 25846, (304) 465-6527, Jamie_Fields@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Administrative Background
The New River Gorge National River (NERI or park), a unit of the
National Park System located in West Virginia, encompasses
approximately 72,000 acres within a 53-mile corridor along the New
River, extending from Hawks Nest State Park to Hinton. Congress
directed the establishment of NERI as a unit of the National Park
System, largely in response to a 20-year grassroots effort organized by
local community leaders. In 1978, President Jimmy Carter signed
legislation establishing the park, ``for the purpose of conserving and
interpreting outstanding natural, scenic, and historic values and
objects in and around the New River Gorge and preserving as a free-
flowing stream an important segment of the New River in West Virginia
for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.''
Public Law 95-625, sec. 1101, 1978. Subsequent legislation concerning
the park states in its findings that NERI ``has provided the basis for
increased recreation and tourism activities in southern West Virginia
due to its nationally recognized status and has greatly contributed to
the regional economy.'' Public Law 100-534, sec. 2(a)(1)-(2), 1988.
The park's 1982 General Management Plan (1982 GMP) anticipated
accommodating an expanding array of recreational pursuits, including
off-road bicycling. It states that ``[l]evels of use of new or unusual
forms of recreation (such as hang gliding, rock climbing, dirt
bicycling) will be managed to avoid problems of visitor safety,
conflicts between uses, or resource impacts.'' Page 18.
The 1982 GMP also anticipated trail construction as funding became
available. A subsequent park-wide Trail Development Plan (1993)
recommended that the park develop a trail system emphasizing multiple
uses, including hiking and bicycling. Both of these plans can be viewed
by going to the NERI park planning Web site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following this path: click the link for
``Environmental Assessment: Design and Build Two Stacked Loop Hiking
and Biking Trail Systems * * *;'' click the link to the Document List
on the left; click the link to either the ``1982 NERI General
Management Plan'' or the ``1993 NERI Trail Development Plan;'' then
download the documents on their respective pages.
The park began developing a new, updated general management plan in
2005 to respond to changes in park boundaries, land acquisitions, and
park and public needs and priorities that had occurred since the 1982
GMP was approved. As a component of this process, and based upon an
analysis of the park's enabling legislation and subsequent amendments,
administrative history, resources, values and opportunities, NERI staff
developed a Foundation Plan that determined that a major purpose of the
park is to ``provide opportunities for public understanding,
appreciation and enjoyment of the park's natural, cultural, scenic and
recreational resources and values.'' Page 5. As stated in the
Foundation Plan, two major reasons that NERI is significant enough to
have been designated as a unit of the National Park System are its
``diverse and extraordinary scenic resources and views accessible to
visitors from the river, rocky overlooks, trails and rural roads
throughout the park, and its exceptional opportunities for exploration,
adventure, discovery, solitude and community.'' Page 6. Other purpose
and significance statements that highlight the park's natural and
cultural resources can be found in the Foundation Plan, which can be
viewed by going to the NERI park planning Web site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following this path: click the link
for ``General Management Plan;'' click the link to the Document List on
the left; click the link to the ``Draft General Management Plan and
EIS/Draft Foundation Plan;'' then download the document entitled
``Draft Foundation Plan'' at the bottom of the page (corrections to the
Foundation Plan are located in the ``Abbreviated Final General
Management Plan * * *,'' also in the Document List).
The park's updated 2010/2011 GMP and Environmental Impact Statement
(2010/2011 GMP/EIS) process revealed substantial and consistent public
support for designating routes in the park as bicycle trails during
public scoping (February 2004 through October 2007) and public comment
(January 13, 2010 through April 16, 2010).
The 2010/2011 GMP/EIS proposed that, after promulgation of the
required special regulations and proper compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), bicycle use would be an appropriate
use on new and existing trails. This would include bicycle use in
frontcountry zones, in backcountry zones on single track trails, and on
a limited basis on a variety of trail types in historic resource, river
corridor, and park development zones. The Record of Decision (ROD) for
the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS was signed, and the Notice of Availability was
published in the Federal Register (77 FR 12877, March 2, 2012). The
2010/2011 GMP/EIS can be viewed by going to the NERI park planning Web
site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following
this path: click the link for ``General Management Plan;'' click the
link to the Document List on the left; click the link to the ``Draft
General Management Plan and EIS/Draft Foundation Plan;'' then download
the documents at the bottom of the page (corrections to the 2010/2011
GMP/EIS are located in the ``Abbreviated Final General Management Plan
* * *,'' also in the Document List).
As a result of the public support for bicycle use expressed early
in the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS process, the park developed an Environmental
Assessment (Trails EA) to evaluate the impact of the construction of
new trails and designation of new and existing park trails as routes
for bicycle use. Public scoping for the Trails EA, which occurred from
November 10, 2009 until January 15, 2010 (with a public focus group on
November 10, 2009 and a public open house on December 8, 2009),
confirmed there was overwhelming support for bicycle use on trails.
Only one of approximately 400 scoping comments from residents of 32
[[Page 51735]]
states was opposed to bicycle use at NERI.
Trail Terminology
The following trail terminology is used in the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS,
the Trails EA, and the proposed rule:
Park administrative roads generally have one-lane (two-
track) dirt and gravel surfaces and are open only to National Park
Service (NPS) authorized vehicle use. Public access is limited to
hiking, in some cases bicycle use, and in a few cases equestrian use.
Frontcountry trails, located in and near developed areas,
have a maximum width of 30 to 36 inches and accommodate moderate use by
a range of users (including hikers and bicyclists).
Backcountry trails in remote areas do not exceed 18 to 24
inches in width and are designed for low use by experienced hikers and,
in limited cases, bicyclists.
Stacked loop trail systems are designed to have
interconnected loops of trails, often having a variety of degrees of
difficulty, that provide trail users options for varied distances,
routes and destinations.
Connector trails connect destinations or other trails to
one another. Also, connector trails are segments of trails that could
link together the `Through the Park Trail,' as proposed in the 2010/
2011 GMP/EIS. Currently, only some segments of the future `Through the
Park Trail' have been established.
The term branch is synonymous with ``creek.'' For example,
Panther Branch is a creek that is a tributary of the New River.
The difficulty of negotiating various trail sections in
the two stacked loop trail systems is described in the Trails EA by
designations of Easiest, More Difficult, and Most Difficult. The Trails
EA anticipates that these descriptions will be applied to all other
bike trails in the park.
[cir] Represented by a green circle, the easiest trails may be
identified as ``Easy'' on interpretive kiosks and other publicly
available media and are appropriate for bicyclists of a novice skill
level. Easiest trails have firm surfaces with few obstacles, average
trail grades of five percent or less, maximum grades of ten percent or
less and are generally about 30 to 36 inches wide at the active trail
tread.
[cir] Represented by a blue square, the more difficult trails may
be designated as ``Moderate'' on interpretive kiosks and other publicly
available media and are trails appropriate for bicyclists of an
intermediate skill level. More difficult trails may include obstacles
such as steps, stairs, and steep, exposed sections. Average trail
grades on more difficult trails are ten percent or less, maximum grades
are 15 percent or less, and active tread width is about 20 to 24
inches.
[cir] Represented by a black diamond, the most difficult trails
may be designated as ``Difficult'' (or sometimes ``Strenuous'') on
interpretive kiosks and other publicly available media and are
appropriate for bicyclists of an expert skill level. Most difficult
trails include obstacles such as steps, stairs, and significantly steep
or exposed sections, have average grades of 15 percent or less, but can
include maximum grades of 15 percent or more. Active tread width of
most difficult trails is generally 12 to 18 inches.
Alternatives in Trails EA
The Trails EA presented three alternatives. Alternative A is the No
Action Alternative and provided for the continuation of current
management practices. Proposals common to both action alternatives (B
and C) provided for the designation of some existing park trails and
administrative roads as routes open to bicycle use, and for the
construction and designation of three new trails for hiking and bicycle
use by converting existing roads no longer used for vehicle access into
the Mud Turn, Panther Branch Connector and Brooklyn Miner's Connector
Trails.
Alternative B, the Preferred Alternative that became the NPS
Selected Alternative, also provided for the development and
construction of approximately 11 miles of new single track trail,
called the Craig Branch Stacked Loop Trail System, and the development
and construction of 33 miles of new single track trail, called the
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail System for hiking and bicycle use.
Alternative C provided for the development and construction of 4.5
miles of single track trail on existing informal routes, such as old
logging roads, called the Craig Branch Stacked Loop Trail System, and
the development and construction of 45 miles of new single track trail,
much of which would also be constructed on existing informal routes,
called the Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail System for bicycle use.
Of the 50 comments received on the Trails EA during the public
comment period from January 26, 2011 through March 4, 2011, only two
did not support the preferred alternative. One of these comments
opposed the new trail development and did not mention bike use, and the
other comment opposed bike use in natural areas, but did not
specifically address NERI. The other 48 comments, most of which came
from the local community of regular park visitors, supported bicycle
use in the park.
Following public comment, the NPS selected the preferred
alternative B, including the proposals common to both action
alternatives. The NPS Northeast Regional Director signed a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) on April 1, 2011. The Trails EA and FONSI
can be viewed by going to the NERI park planning Web site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following this path: click
the link for ``Environmental Assessment: Design and Build Two Stacked
Loop Hiking and Biking Trail Systems * * *;'' click the link to the
Document List on the left; click the link to either the ``Environmental
Assessment--Design and Build * * *'' or the ``Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI);'' then download the documents on their respective
pages.
Renaming of Trails
Since the FONSI was signed, several trail names in the Nuttallburg
area of the park have changed. The Nuttall Mine Trail (also an
administrative road) was renamed the Headhouse Trail on public maps.
The Nuttallburg Town Connector Trail was renamed the Nuttallburg Town
Loop Connector Trail. The Nuttallburg Tipple Trail (also an
administrative road) was broken up on public maps into the Tipple Trail
and the Seldom Seen Trail. The actual trail/administrative road on the
ground remains the same as the Nuttallburg Tipple Trail addressed in
the EA and FONSI. The Keeneys Creek Trail has been renamed on some
public maps and documents as the Keeneys Creek Rail Trail, but older
materials still call it the Keeneys Creek Trail.
Since its construction in summer of 2011, the Craig Branch Stacked
Loop Trail System has been renamed the Arrowhead Trail. The proposed
rule and future park maps will reflect this change, while prior
documents (primarily the Trails EA and FONSI) refer to the Craig Branch
Stacked Loop Trail System. Additionally, the Trails EA and FONSI refer
to the stacked loop trails in the Craig Branch (now Arrowhead) and
Garden Ground areas as ``trail systems.'' In the proposed rule, they
are called the ``Arrowhead Trail'' and the ``Garden Ground Stacked Loop
Trail,'' and are each treated as individual trails with interconnected
segments.
[[Page 51736]]
Proposed Rule
Following the Trails EA and FONSI, the proposed rule would
authorize bicycle use on two new stacked loop trail systems (the
Arrowhead Trail and the Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail System), three
new trails converted from existing roads that are no longer used for
vehicle access (the Mud Turn, Panther Branch Connector and Brooklyn
Miner's Connector Trails), and 19 existing trails and administrative
roads throughout the park. All of the new trails are approved for
construction through the FONSI, but only the Arrowhead Trail has been
constructed.
Arrowhead and Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trails
The Arrowhead Trail includes 13 miles of easy and more difficult
single track trail above the rim of the New River Gorge on rolling,
forested terrain. The trail has been built according to the
frontcountry trail standards outlined in the park's 2010/2011 GMP/EIS.
The Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail would include approximately 33
miles of more difficult and most difficult single track trail
traversing the edge of the plateau and along the bottom of the gorge
parallel to the New River, with several challenging rim-to-river
connections on the steep, forested slopes. The Garden Ground Stacked
Loop Trail segments will be built in accordance with the backcountry
trail standards outlined in the park's 2010/2011 GMP/EIS. Both trail
systems will connect to other existing park trails and incorporate
sustainable design and construction elements that take multi-use (hike
and bike) social and physical issues into account while also mitigating
the impacts of hiking and bicycle use. As new trails are constructed,
old logging roads and recreational vehicle routes on adjacent lands
will be rehabilitated and invasive plant species will be treated or
removed.
Three New Trails Converted From Roads
The proposed rule would designate three new trails that would be
constructed by converting existing, unused roads into single track,
multi-use (hike and bike) trails. The Mud Turn Trail would be located
on an abandoned road that connects the rim at Grandview to the river
along Glade Creek Road by running along Mill Creek for approximately
2.75 miles. The Panther Branch Connector Trail, approximately three
miles long between Glade Creek and Panther Branch, would be located on
an abandoned state road and on a short section of old rail bed that was
abandoned in the 1940s. The Brooklyn Miner's Connector Trail, less than
one mile long, would be located on segments of an abandoned coal road
connecting the lower tipple to the upper mine bench of the Brooklyn
Mine area. These proposed road-to-trail conversions would be built to
the backcountry trail standards proposed in the park's 2010/2011 GMP/
EIS and incorporate the same sustainable design and construction
principles used in the Arrowhead Trail.
Designation of Existing Trails and Administrative Roads for Bicycle Use
The proposed rule would designate 19 existing park trails and
administrative roads, approximately 52 miles in total, to allow bicycle
use. These are predominantly remnants of roads and railroad beds
existing before the park was established or before the park had
acquired land within its boundaries. Created primarily for logging and
mining, some tracks were later developed or used for recreational
purposes by local people on foot, and by off-road vehicle, motorcycle
or bicycle. Once the park was established and the NPS acquired the
land, these routes were adaptively reused as trails and administrative
roads. Additional trails have since been constructed by NPS, most
notably the Fayetteville Trail complex, which includes the backcountry
Fayetteville Trail, the Park Loop, and the Timber Ridge Trail.
Trails To Be Designated for Bicycle Use
The proposed rule would authorize bicycle use on the routes listed
and described in the tables below. Trails are labeled as Frontcountry,
Backcountry, or Administrative Road in accordance with the management
zones listed in the 2010/2011 GMP/EIS and the terms defined in the
Trails EA. Trails that are only partially located on administrative
roads are noted where appropriate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trail name Mi. Existing or new Trail standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Routes for Bicycle Use--Stacked Loop Trails
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrowhead Trail........................ 13.0 New, Constructed.................. Frontcountry.
Garden Ground Stacked Loop Trail....... 33.0 New, Constructed.................. Backcountry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Routes for Bicycle Use--Trails Converted From Roads
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mud Turn Trail......................... 2.8 New............................... Backcountry.
Panther Branch Connector Trail......... 3.0 New............................... Backcountry.
Brooklyn Miner's Connector Trail....... 0.8 New............................... Backcountry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Routes for Bicycle Use--Existing Trails and Administrative Roads
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hawks Nest Connector Trail............. 3.5 Existing.......................... Frontcountry.
Fayetteville Trail..................... 4.0 Existing.......................... Backcountry.
Park Loop Trail........................ 1.1 Existing.......................... Backcountry.
Timber Ridge Trail..................... 1.0 Existing.......................... Backcountry.
Kaymoor Trail.......................... 8.6 Existing.......................... Part Frontcountry/Part
Administrative Road.
Craig Branch Trail..................... 2.4 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Long Point Trail (except the last 0.2 1.4 Existing.......................... Frontcountry.
mi closest to the Long Point vista).
Keeneys Creek Rail Trail............... 3.0 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Headhouse Trail........................ 0.5 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Tipple Trail........................... 0.5 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Seldom Seen Trail...................... 0.3 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Nuttallburg Town Loop Connector Trail.. 0.3 Existing.......................... Frontcountry.
Brooklyn Mine Trail.................... 2.7 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Southside Trail........................ 7.0 Existing.......................... Part Frontcountry/Part
Administrative Road.
Rend Trail............................. 3.4 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
[[Page 51737]]
Stone Cliff Trail...................... 2.7 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Terry Top Trail........................ 1.7 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Little Laurel Trail.................... 2.6 Existing.......................... Administrative Road.
Glade Creek Trail...................... 5.6 Existing.......................... Part Frontcountry/Part
Administrative Road.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maps of these designated routes are available in the office of the
Superintendent and may also be viewed in the Trails EA, which can be
found by going to the NERI park planning Web site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm, then following this path: click the link
for ``Environmental Assessment: Design and Build Two Stacked Loop
Hiking and Biking Trail Systems * * * ;'' click the link to the
Document List on the left; click the link to the ``Environmental
Assessment--Design and Build * * *;'' then download the document at the
bottom of the page. A park map showing existing trails and
administrative roads can also be found by downloading the NERI Trails
Guide from the following Web site: https://www.nps.gov/neri/planyourvisit/trails-guide.htm.
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders, and Department Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs) will review all significant rules. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not
significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). This conclusion is based on the results of a cost/benefit and
regulatory flexibility threshold analysis available for review on the
NERI park planning Web site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm. The rule would not regulate small business. The rule
would likely increase visitation at the park, which could generate
benefits for small businesses in the local community through increased
spending for goods and services.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. The July 2011 NPS economic analysis estimated that the
addition of more than 100 miles of new trails will significantly
improve NERI's attractiveness to bicyclists and thus drive additional
economic activity.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. The rule will not impose restrictions
on local businesses in the form of fees, training, recordkeeping, or
other measures that would increase costs.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. The rule addresses
public use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in section 2 of Executive Order 12630, this rule
does not have significant takings implications. This rule only
designates bicycle routes and manages bicycle use on those routes
within the boundaries of the New River National River. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This rule only
effects use of NPS administered lands. A Federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not
required.
Throughout numerous past and current park planning processes, no
expression of affiliation has been asserted with NERI by any tribal
governments or organizations. Tribes that could potentially be
affiliated were contacted individually during the development of the
2010/2011 GMP/EIS and no response was received. Copies of the Trails EA
were sent to 14 Native American tribes who were identified as possibly
having some interest in the
[[Page 51738]]
park. The Chief of the Remnant Yuchi Nation was the only tribal
representative to respond; he indicated that he was grateful to be
acknowledged, that the NPS should continue the excellent work, and that
he had no formal questions at this time.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission under the PRA is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
We have prepared environmental assessments to determine whether
this rule would have a significant impact on the quality of the human
environment under the NEPA. This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment. A detailed statement under the NEPA is not required
because the NPS reached a FONSI for the Selected Alternative. The
Trails EA, the FONSI and other relevant documents and records of the
public process may be viewed by going to the NERI park planning Web
site, https://www.nps.gov/neri/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1 (b)(12)),
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this proposed rule were Jamie Fields, New
River Gorge National River; Joshua Nadas, NPS Conservation and Outdoor
Recreation Programs; and Justin Hollimon, Regulations and Special Park
Uses, National Park Service, Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the NPS proposes to amend 36 CFR
part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued
under DC Code 10-137 (2001) and DC Code 50-2201 (2001).
2. In Sec. 7.89 revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.89 New River Gorge National River.
* * * * *
(b) Bicycling (1) Where may I ride a bicycle within New River Gorge
National River? Bicycle use is permitted on park roads, in parking
areas, and on routes designated within the park in accordance with
Sec. 4.30 of this chapter. The following table lists administrative
roads and trails designated for bicycle use:
Administrative Roads and Trails Designated for Bicycle Use--North to
South
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hawks Nest Connector Trail.. Keeneys Creek Rail Rend Trail.
Trail.
Fayetteville Trail.......... Headhouse Trail..... Stone Cliff Trail.
Park Loop Trail............. Tipple Trail........ Terry Top Trail.
Timber Ridge Trail.......... Seldom Seen Trail... Garden Ground
Stacked Loop Trail.
Kaymoor Trail............... Nuttallburg Town Little Laurel Trail.
Loop Connector
Trail.
Craig Branch Trail.......... Brooklyn Mine Trail. Mud Turn Trail.
Arrowhead Trail............. Brooklyn Miner's Glade Creek Trail.
Connector Trail.
Long Point Trail (except 0.2 Southside Trail..... Panther Branch
miles closest to Long Point Connector Trail.
Vista).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) How will I know where the trails designated for bicycle use
are located in the park? Designated trails are identified on maps
located in the Superintendent's office, at interpretive kiosks, and on
the park's Web site. Trails will also be posted at trailheads and other
appropriate locations.
(3) What requirements must I meet to ride a bicycle within New
River Gorge National River? (i) In addition to the applicable
provisions in 36 CFR part 4, all bicyclists must yield to other trail
users in the following manner:
(A) A bicyclist must yield to an equestrian;
(B) A bicyclist must yield to a pedestrian; and
(C) A bicyclist travelling downhill must yield to a bicyclist
travelling uphill.
(ii) Yielding the right of way requires slowing down to a safe
speed, being prepared to stop, establishing communication, and passing
safely.
(iii) Failure to yield is prohibited.
(4) How will the Superintendent manage the designated bicycle
routes? The Superintendent may open or close designated bicycle routes,
or portions thereof, or impose conditions or restrictions for bicycle
use after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural
and cultural resource protection, and other management activities and
objectives.
(i) The Superintendent will provide public notice of all such
actions through
[[Page 51739]]
one or more of the methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter.
(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or restriction is prohibited.
Dated: August 17, 2012.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012-20898 Filed 8-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-YP-P