Federal Acquisition Regulation; Basic Safeguarding of Contractor Information Systems, 51496-51499 [2012-20881]
Download as PDF
51496
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 165
Friday, August 24, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
The public comment period for these
regulations expired on August 16, 2012.
The notice of proposed rulemaking and
notice of public hearing instructed those
interested in testifying at the public
hearing to submit a request to speak and
an outline of the topics to be addressed.
The public hearing scheduled for
August 24, 2012, is cancelled.
26 CFR Part 1
LaNita VanDyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[REG–113738–12]
[FR Doc. 2012–20995 Filed 8–22–12; 4:15 pm]
Internal Revenue Service
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
RIN 1545–BK94
Amendment of Prohibited Payment
Option Under Single-Employer Defined
Benefit Plan of Plan Sponsor in
Bankruptcy; Hearing Cancellation
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public
hearing on proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document cancels a
public hearing on proposed regulations
under section 411(d)(6) of the Internal
Revenue Code. The proposed
regulations provide guidance under the
anti-cutback rules of section 411(d)(6) of
the Internal Revenue Code, which
generally prohibit plan amendments
eliminating or reducing accrued
benefits, early retirement benefits,
retirement-type subsidies, and optional
forms of benefit under qualified
retirement plans.
DATES: The public hearing, originally
scheduled for August 24, 2012 at 10
a.m. is cancelled.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Oluwafunmilayo Taylor of the
Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate
Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration) at (202) 622–7180 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking and a notice of
public hearing that appeared in the
Federal Register on Thursday, June 21,
2012 (77 FR 37349) announced that a
public hearing was scheduled for
August 24, 2012, at 10 a.m. in the IRS
Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building,
1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. The subject of the
public hearing was under the sections
411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 4, 7, 12, 42, and 52
[FAR Case 2011–020; Docket 2011–0020;
Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM19
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Basic
Safeguarding of Contractor
Information Systems
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to add a
new subpart and contract clause for the
basic safeguarding of contractor
information systems that contain
information provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public
information) that will be resident on or
transiting through contractor
information systems.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addressees
shown below on or before October 23,
2012 to be considered in the formation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2011–020 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2011–020.’’
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2011–
020.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2011–
020’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2011–020, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Patricia Corrigan, Procurement Analyst,
at 202–208–1963, for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–
4755. Please cite FAR Case 2011–020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The FAR presently does not
specifically address the safeguarding of
contractor information systems that
contain or process information provided
by or generated for the Government
(other than public information). DoD
published an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) and
notice of public meeting in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 9563 on March 3,
2010, under Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) Case 2008–D028, Safeguarding
Unclassified Information. The ANPR
addressed basic and enhanced
safeguarding procedures for the
protection of DoD unclassified
information. Basic protection measures
are first-level information technology
security measures used to deter
unauthorized disclosure, loss, or
compromise. The ANPR also addressed
enhanced information protection
measures that included requirements for
encryption and network intrusion
protection.
Resulting public comments of the
DFARS rule were considered in drafting
a proposed FAR rule under FAR case
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Proposed Rules
2009–030, which focused on the basic
safeguarding of unclassified
Government information within
contractor information systems. The
Councils agreed to the draft proposed
FAR rule, but it was not published. On
June 29, 2011, the contents of FAR case
2009–030 were rolled into FAR case
2011–020, which is not limited to a
single category of Government
information, e.g., unclassified.
This proposed FAR rule would add a
contract clause to address requirements
for the basic safeguarding of contractor
information systems that contain or
process information provided by or
generated for the Government (other
than public information). DoD, GSA,
and NASA concluded that these
requirements are an extension of the
requirements, under the Federal
Information Security Management Act
(FISMA) of 2002, for Federal agencies to
provide information security for
information and information systems
that support the operations and assets of
the agency, including those managed by
contractors. 44 U.S.C. 3544(a)(1)(A)(ii)
describes Federal agency security
responsibilities as including
‘‘information systems used or operated
by an agency or by a contractor of an
agency or other organization on behalf
of an agency.’’ The safeguarding
measures would not apply to public
information as defined at 44 U.S.C.
3502.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
II. Proposed Rule
The proposed FAR changes would
add a new subpart at 4.17, Basic
Safeguarding of Contractor Information
Systems. The other FAR changes
include the following:
• Definitions at FAR 4.1701, for
‘‘information’’ derived from the
Committee on National Security
Systems Instruction 4009, April 26,
2010, and ‘‘information system’’ and
‘‘public information’’ from 44 U.S.C.
3502;
• Applicability at FAR 4.1702, which
applies the rule to commercial items
and commercial-off-the-shelf items
when a contractor’s information system
contains information provided by or
generated for the Government (other
than public information) that will be
resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems. It also
may be applied under the simplified
acquisition threshold when the
contracting officer determines that
inclusion of the clause is appropriate.
• Applicability added to FAR 12.301,
Solicitation provisions and contract
clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
• A clause at FAR 52.204–XX, Basic
Safeguarding of Contractor Information
Systems, which requires the contractor
to provide protective measures to
information provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public
information) that will be resident on or
transiting through contractor
information systems in the following
areas:
Æ Public computers or Web sites.
Æ Transmitting electronic
information.
Æ Transmitting voice and fax
information.
Æ Physical and electronic barriers.
Æ Sanitization.
Æ Intrusion protection.
Æ Transfer limitations.
• Conforming changes were made at
FAR subparts 7.1, Acquisition Plans and
42.3, Contract Administration Office
Functions.
The proposed FAR changes address
only basic requirements for the
safeguarding of contractor information
systems, and may be altered as
necessary to align with any future
direction given in response to ongoing
efforts led by the National Archives and
Records Administration in the
implementation of Executive Order
13556 of November 4, 2010, ‘‘Controlled
Unclassified Information,’’ published in
the Federal Register at 75 FR 68675, on
November 9, 2010. Further, the clause
prescribed in the proposed rule is not
intended to implement any other, more
specific safeguarding requirements, or to
conflict with any contract clauses or
requirements that specifically address
the safeguarding of information or
information systems. If any restrictions
or authorizations in this clause are
inconsistent with a requirement of any
other clause in a contract, the
requirement of the other clause shall
take precedence over the requirement of
the clause at FAR 52.204–XX.
There are other pending rules that are
related to this rule, but this rule does
not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
the other rules. The other FAR rules are
as follows:
• FAR Case 2011–001, Organizational
Conflict of Interest and Contractor
Access to Nonpublic Information; and
• FAR Case 2011–010, Sharing Cyber
Threat Information.
The status of DFARS and FAR cases
can be tracked at https://
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
case_status.html.
II. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51497
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September
30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is
summarized as follows:
This action is being implemented to revise
the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
protect against the compromise of contractor
computer networks on which information
provided by or generated for the Government
(other than public information) that will be
resident on or transiting through contractor
information systems.
The objective of this rule is to improve the
protection of information provided by or
generated for the Government (other than
public information) that will be resident on
or transiting through contractor information
systems by employing basic security
measures, as identified in the clause to
appropriately protect information provided
by or generated for the Government (other
than public information) that will be resident
on or transiting through contractor
information systems from unauthorized
disclosure, loss, or compromise.
This proposed rule applies to all Federal
contractors and appropriate subcontractors
regardless of size or business ownership. The
resultant cost impact is considered not
significant, since the first-level protective
measures (i.e., updated virus protection, the
latest security software patches, etc.) are
typically employed as part of the routine
course of doing business. It is recognized that
the cost of not using basic information
technology system protection measures
would be a significant detriment to
contractor and Government business,
resulting in reduced system performance and
the potential loss of valuable information. It
is also recognized that prudent business
practices designed to protect an information
technology system are typically a common
part of everyday operations. As a result, the
benefit of securely receiving and processing
information provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public information)
that will be resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems offers
substantial value to contractors and the
Government by reducing vulnerabilities to
contractor systems by keeping information
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
51498
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Proposed Rules
provided by or generated for the Government
(other than public information) that will be
resident on or transiting through contractor
information systems safe.
There are no known significant alternatives
to the rule that would further minimize any
economic impact of the rule on small
entities.
The Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils
invite comments from small business
concerns and other interested parties on
the expected impact of this rule on
small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAR Case 2011–020) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4, 7, 12,
42, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: August 17, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 4, 7, 12,
42, and 52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 4, 7, 12, 42, and 52 are revised to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 4—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
2. Add Subpart 4.17 to read as
follows.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Subpart 4.17—Basic Safeguarding of
Contractor Information Systems
Sec.
4.1700 Scope of subpart.
4.1701 Definitions.
4.1702 Applicability.
4.1703 Solicitation provision and contract
clause.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Subpart 4.17—Basic Safeguarding of
Contractor Information Systems
4.1700
*
Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes policies and
procedures for safeguarding information
provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public
information) that will be resident on or
transiting through contractor
information systems.
4.1701
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Information means any
communication or representation of
knowledge such as facts, data, or
opinions in any medium or form,
including textual, numerical, graphic,
cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual.
Information system means a discrete
set of information resources organized
for the collection, processing,
maintenance, use, sharing,
dissemination, or disposition of
information (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Public information means any
information, regardless of form or
format, that an agency discloses,
disseminates, or makes available to the
public (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Safeguarding means measures or
controls that are prescribed to protect
information.
4.1702
7.105 Contents of written acquisition
plans.
Applicability.
This subpart applies to all
solicitations, contracts (including orders
and those for commercial items and
commercially available off-the-shelf
items), when a contractor’s information
system may contain information
provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public
information).
4.1703 Solicitation provision and contract
clause.
Use the clause at 52.204–XX, Basic
Safeguarding of Contractor Information
Systems, in solicitations and contracts
above the simplified acquisition
threshold when the contractor or a
subcontractor at any tier may have
information residing in or transiting
through its information system, where
such information is provided by or
generated for the Government (other
than public information). The clause
may also be used in contracts below the
simplified acquisition threshold when
the contracting officer determines that
inclusion of the clause is appropriate.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(18) Security considerations.
(i) For acquisitions dealing with
classified matters, discuss how adequate
security will be established, maintained,
and monitored (see subpart 4.4).
(ii) For information technology
acquisitions, discuss how agency
information security requirements will
be met.
(iii) For acquisitions requiring routine
contractor physical access to a
Federally-controlled facility and/or
routine access to a Federally controlled
information system, discuss how agency
requirements for personal identity
verification of contractors will be met
(see subpart 4.13).
(iv) For acquisitions that may require
information provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public
information) to reside on or transit
through contractor information systems,
discuss how this information will be
protected (see subpart 4.17).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 12—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
4. Amend section 12.301 by
redesignating paragraph (d)(2) as
paragraph (d)(4), and adding a new
paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:
12.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Insert the clause at 52.204–XX,
Basic Safeguarding of Contractor
Information Systems, in solicitations
and contracts, as prescribed in 4.1703.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 42—CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
5. Amend section 42.302 by
redesignating paragraphs (a)(21) through
(a)(71) as paragraphs (a)(22) through
(a)(72); and adding a new paragraph
(a)(21) to read as follows.
42.302
Contract administration functions.
(a) * * *
(21) Ensure that the contractor has
protective measures in place, consistent
with the requirements of the clause at
52.204–XX.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 7—ACQUISITION PLANNING
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. Amend section 7.105 by revising
paragraph (b)(18) to read as follows.
6. Add section 52.204–XX to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Proposed Rules
52.204–XX Basic Safeguarding of
Contractor Information Systems.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
As prescribed in 4.1703, use the
following clause:
Basic Safeguarding of Contractor
Information Systems (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
Clearing means removal of data from an
information system, its storage devices, and
other peripheral devices with storage
capacity, in such a way that the data may not
be reconstructed using common system
capabilities (i.e., through the keyboard);
however, the data may be reconstructed
using laboratory methods.
Compromise means disclosure of
information to unauthorized persons, or a
violation of the security policy of a system
in which unauthorized intentional or
unintentional disclosure, modification,
destruction, or loss of an object may have
occurred. This includes copying the data
through covert network channels or the
copying of data to unauthorized media.
Data means a subset of information in an
electronic format that allows it to be retrieved
or transmitted.
Information means any communication or
representation of knowledge such as facts,
data, or opinions, in any medium or form,
including textual, numerical, graphic,
cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual.
Information system means a discrete set of
information resources organized for the
collection, processing, maintenance, use,
sharing, dissemination, or disposition of
information (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Intrusion means an unauthorized act of
bypassing the security mechanisms of a
system.
Media means physical devices or writing
surfaces including but not limited to
magnetic tapes, optical disks, magnetic disks,
large scale integration memory chips, and
printouts (but not including display media,
e.g., a computer monitor, cathode ray tube
(CRT) or other (transient) visual output) onto
which information is recorded, stored, or
printed within an information system.
Public information means any information,
regardless of form or format, that an agency
discloses, disseminates, or makes available to
the public (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Safeguarding means measures or controls
that are prescribed to protect information.
Voice means all oral information regardless
of transmission protocol.
(b) Safeguarding requirements and
procedures. The Contractor shall apply the
following basic safeguarding requirements to
protect information provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public
information) which resides on or transits
through its information systems from
unauthorized access and disclosure:
(1) Protecting information on public
computers or Web sites: Do not process
information provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public information)
on public computers (e.g., those available for
use by the general public in kiosks, hotel
business centers) or computers that do not
have access control. Information provided by
or generated for the Government (other than
public information) shall not be posted on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Web sites that are publicly available or have
access limited only by domain/Internet
Protocol restriction. Such information may be
posted to web pages that control access by
user ID/password, user certificates, or other
technical means, and that provide protection
via use of security technologies. Access
control may be provided by the intranet
(versus the Web site itself or the application
it hosts).
(2) Transmitting electronic information.
Transmit email, text messages, blogs, and
similar communications that contain
information provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public information),
using technology and processes that provide
the best level of security and privacy
available, given facilities, conditions, and
environment.
(3) Transmitting voice and fax information.
Transmit information provided by or
generated for the Government (other than
public information), via voice and fax only
when the sender has a reasonable assurance
that access is limited to authorized
recipients.
(4) Physical and electronic barriers. Protect
information provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public information),
by at least one physical and one electronic
barrier (e.g., locked container or room, login
and password) when not under direct
individual control.
(5) Sanitization. At a minimum, clear
information on media that have been used to
process information provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public
information), before external release or
disposal. Overwriting is an acceptable means
of clearing media in accordance with
National Institute of Standards and
Technology 800–88, Guidelines for Media
Sanitization, at https://csrc.nist.gov/
publications/nistpubs/800-88/NISTSP80088_rev1.pdf.
(6) Intrusion protection. Provide at a
minimum the following protections against
computer intrusions and data compromise:
(i) Current and regularly updated malware
protection services, e.g., anti-virus, antispyware.
(ii) Prompt application of security-relevant
software upgrades, e.g., patches, servicepacks, and hot fixes.
(7) Transfer limitations. Transfer
information provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public information),
only to those subcontractors that both require
the information for purposes of contract
performance and provide at least the same
level of security as specified in this clause.
(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include the substance of this clause,
including this paragraph (c), in all
subcontracts under this contract that may
have information residing in or transiting
through its information system, where such
is provided by or generated for the
Government (other than public information).
(d) Other contractual requirements
regarding the safeguarding of information.
This clause addresses basic requirements,
and is subordinate to any other contract
clauses or requirements that specifically
address the safeguarding of information or
information systems. If any restrictions or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51499
authorizations in this clause are inconsistent
with a requirement of any other such clause
in this contract, the requirement of the other
clause shall take precedence over the
requirement of this clause.
[FR Doc. 2012–20881 Filed 8–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 535
[NHTSA 2012–0126]
RIN 2127–AK74
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards
and Fuel Efficiency Standards for
Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and
Vehicles
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Denial of petition for
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The National Highway Traffic
Administration (NHTSA) is denying the
petition of Plant Oil Powered Diesel
Fuel Systems, Inc. (‘‘POP Diesel’’) to
amend the final rules establishing fuel
efficiency standards for medium- and
heavy-duty vehicles. NHTSA does not
believe that POP Diesel has set forth a
basis for rulemaking. The agency
disagrees with the petitioner’s assertion
that a failure to specifically consider
pure vegetable oil, and technology to
enable its usage, as a feasible technology
in heavy-duty vehicles, led to the
adoption of less stringent standards.
NHTSA also disagrees with POP’s
assertion that the agency failed to
adequately consider the rebound effect
in setting the standards.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For Non-Legal Issues: James Tamm,
Office of Rulemaking, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590,
Telephone (202) 493–0515.
For Legal Issues: Lily Smith, Office of
Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590,
Telephone: (202) 366–2992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On September 15, 2011, NHTSA
issued a final rule creating fuel
efficiency standards for medium- and
heavy-duty vehicles (‘‘heavy-duty rule’’)
(76 FR 57106).
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51496-51499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20881]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 4, 7, 12, 42, and 52
[FAR Case 2011-020; Docket 2011-0020; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM19
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Basic Safeguarding of Contractor
Information Systems
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to add a new subpart and contract clause
for the basic safeguarding of contractor information systems that
contain information provided by or generated for the Government (other
than public information) that will be resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or
before October 23, 2012 to be considered in the formation of the final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2011-020 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``FAR Case
2011-020.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``FAR Case 2011-020.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit
a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any),
and ``FAR Case 2011-020'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2011-
020, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Patricia Corrigan, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-208-1963, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2011-020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The FAR presently does not specifically address the safeguarding of
contractor information systems that contain or process information
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information). DoD published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPR) and notice of public meeting in the Federal Register at 75 FR
9563 on March 3, 2010, under Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) Case 2008-D028, Safeguarding Unclassified
Information. The ANPR addressed basic and enhanced safeguarding
procedures for the protection of DoD unclassified information. Basic
protection measures are first-level information technology security
measures used to deter unauthorized disclosure, loss, or compromise.
The ANPR also addressed enhanced information protection measures that
included requirements for encryption and network intrusion protection.
Resulting public comments of the DFARS rule were considered in
drafting a proposed FAR rule under FAR case
[[Page 51497]]
2009-030, which focused on the basic safeguarding of unclassified
Government information within contractor information systems. The
Councils agreed to the draft proposed FAR rule, but it was not
published. On June 29, 2011, the contents of FAR case 2009-030 were
rolled into FAR case 2011-020, which is not limited to a single
category of Government information, e.g., unclassified.
This proposed FAR rule would add a contract clause to address
requirements for the basic safeguarding of contractor information
systems that contain or process information provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public information). DoD, GSA, and NASA
concluded that these requirements are an extension of the requirements,
under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002,
for Federal agencies to provide information security for information
and information systems that support the operations and assets of the
agency, including those managed by contractors. 44 U.S.C.
3544(a)(1)(A)(ii) describes Federal agency security responsibilities as
including ``information systems used or operated by an agency or by a
contractor of an agency or other organization on behalf of an agency.''
The safeguarding measures would not apply to public information as
defined at 44 U.S.C. 3502.
II. Proposed Rule
The proposed FAR changes would add a new subpart at 4.17, Basic
Safeguarding of Contractor Information Systems. The other FAR changes
include the following:
Definitions at FAR 4.1701, for ``information'' derived
from the Committee on National Security Systems Instruction 4009, April
26, 2010, and ``information system'' and ``public information'' from 44
U.S.C. 3502;
Applicability at FAR 4.1702, which applies the rule to
commercial items and commercial-off-the-shelf items when a contractor's
information system contains information provided by or generated for
the Government (other than public information) that will be resident on
or transiting through contractor information systems. It also may be
applied under the simplified acquisition threshold when the contracting
officer determines that inclusion of the clause is appropriate.
Applicability added to FAR 12.301, Solicitation provisions
and contract clauses for the acquisition of commercial items;
A clause at FAR 52.204-XX, Basic Safeguarding of
Contractor Information Systems, which requires the contractor to
provide protective measures to information provided by or generated for
the Government (other than public information) that will be resident on
or transiting through contractor information systems in the following
areas:
[cir] Public computers or Web sites.
[cir] Transmitting electronic information.
[cir] Transmitting voice and fax information.
[cir] Physical and electronic barriers.
[cir] Sanitization.
[cir] Intrusion protection.
[cir] Transfer limitations.
Conforming changes were made at FAR subparts 7.1,
Acquisition Plans and 42.3, Contract Administration Office Functions.
The proposed FAR changes address only basic requirements for the
safeguarding of contractor information systems, and may be altered as
necessary to align with any future direction given in response to
ongoing efforts led by the National Archives and Records Administration
in the implementation of Executive Order 13556 of November 4, 2010,
``Controlled Unclassified Information,'' published in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 68675, on November 9, 2010. Further, the clause
prescribed in the proposed rule is not intended to implement any other,
more specific safeguarding requirements, or to conflict with any
contract clauses or requirements that specifically address the
safeguarding of information or information systems. If any restrictions
or authorizations in this clause are inconsistent with a requirement of
any other clause in a contract, the requirement of the other clause
shall take precedence over the requirement of the clause at FAR 52.204-
XX.
There are other pending rules that are related to this rule, but
this rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the other
rules. The other FAR rules are as follows:
FAR Case 2011-001, Organizational Conflict of Interest and
Contractor Access to Nonpublic Information; and
FAR Case 2011-010, Sharing Cyber Threat Information.
The status of DFARS and FAR cases can be tracked at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/case_status.html.
II. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is summarized as follows:
This action is being implemented to revise the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to protect against the compromise of
contractor computer networks on which information provided by or
generated for the Government (other than public information) that
will be resident on or transiting through contractor information
systems.
The objective of this rule is to improve the protection of
information provided by or generated for the Government (other than
public information) that will be resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems by employing basic security measures,
as identified in the clause to appropriately protect information
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information) that will be resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems from unauthorized disclosure, loss,
or compromise.
This proposed rule applies to all Federal contractors and
appropriate subcontractors regardless of size or business ownership.
The resultant cost impact is considered not significant, since the
first-level protective measures (i.e., updated virus protection, the
latest security software patches, etc.) are typically employed as
part of the routine course of doing business. It is recognized that
the cost of not using basic information technology system protection
measures would be a significant detriment to contractor and
Government business, resulting in reduced system performance and the
potential loss of valuable information. It is also recognized that
prudent business practices designed to protect an information
technology system are typically a common part of everyday
operations. As a result, the benefit of securely receiving and
processing information provided by or generated for the Government
(other than public information) that will be resident on or
transiting through contractor information systems offers substantial
value to contractors and the Government by reducing vulnerabilities
to contractor systems by keeping information
[[Page 51498]]
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information) that will be resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems safe.
There are no known significant alternatives to the rule that
would further minimize any economic impact of the rule on small
entities.
The Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the IRFA may
be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils invite
comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on
the expected impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2011-020) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4, 7, 12, 42, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: August 17, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 4, 7,
12, 42, and 52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 4, 7, 12, 42, and 52 are
revised to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 4--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
2. Add Subpart 4.17 to read as follows.
Subpart 4.17--Basic Safeguarding of Contractor Information Systems
Sec.
4.1700 Scope of subpart.
4.1701 Definitions.
4.1702 Applicability.
4.1703 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
Subpart 4.17--Basic Safeguarding of Contractor Information Systems
4.1700 Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for safeguarding
information provided by or generated for the Government (other than
public information) that will be resident on or transiting through
contractor information systems.
4.1701 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Information means any communication or representation of knowledge
such as facts, data, or opinions in any medium or form, including
textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual.
Information system means a discrete set of information resources
organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing,
dissemination, or disposition of information (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Public information means any information, regardless of form or
format, that an agency discloses, disseminates, or makes available to
the public (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Safeguarding means measures or controls that are prescribed to
protect information.
4.1702 Applicability.
This subpart applies to all solicitations, contracts (including
orders and those for commercial items and commercially available off-
the-shelf items), when a contractor's information system may contain
information provided by or generated for the Government (other than
public information).
4.1703 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
Use the clause at 52.204-XX, Basic Safeguarding of Contractor
Information Systems, in solicitations and contracts above the
simplified acquisition threshold when the contractor or a subcontractor
at any tier may have information residing in or transiting through its
information system, where such information is provided by or generated
for the Government (other than public information). The clause may also
be used in contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold when
the contracting officer determines that inclusion of the clause is
appropriate.
PART 7--ACQUISITION PLANNING
3. Amend section 7.105 by revising paragraph (b)(18) to read as
follows.
7.105 Contents of written acquisition plans.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(18) Security considerations.
(i) For acquisitions dealing with classified matters, discuss how
adequate security will be established, maintained, and monitored (see
subpart 4.4).
(ii) For information technology acquisitions, discuss how agency
information security requirements will be met.
(iii) For acquisitions requiring routine contractor physical access
to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a Federally
controlled information system, discuss how agency requirements for
personal identity verification of contractors will be met (see subpart
4.13).
(iv) For acquisitions that may require information provided by or
generated for the Government (other than public information) to reside
on or transit through contractor information systems, discuss how this
information will be protected (see subpart 4.17).
* * * * *
PART 12--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
4. Amend section 12.301 by redesignating paragraph (d)(2) as
paragraph (d)(4), and adding a new paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:
12.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the
acquisition of commercial items.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Insert the clause at 52.204-XX, Basic Safeguarding of
Contractor Information Systems, in solicitations and contracts, as
prescribed in 4.1703.
* * * * *
PART 42--CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
5. Amend section 42.302 by redesignating paragraphs (a)(21) through
(a)(71) as paragraphs (a)(22) through (a)(72); and adding a new
paragraph (a)(21) to read as follows.
42.302 Contract administration functions.
(a) * * *
(21) Ensure that the contractor has protective measures in place,
consistent with the requirements of the clause at 52.204-XX.
* * * * *
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
6. Add section 52.204-XX to read as follows:
[[Page 51499]]
52.204-XX Basic Safeguarding of Contractor Information Systems.
As prescribed in 4.1703, use the following clause:
Basic Safeguarding of Contractor Information Systems (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Clearing means removal of data from an information system, its
storage devices, and other peripheral devices with storage capacity,
in such a way that the data may not be reconstructed using common
system capabilities (i.e., through the keyboard); however, the data
may be reconstructed using laboratory methods.
Compromise means disclosure of information to unauthorized
persons, or a violation of the security policy of a system in which
unauthorized intentional or unintentional disclosure, modification,
destruction, or loss of an object may have occurred. This includes
copying the data through covert network channels or the copying of
data to unauthorized media.
Data means a subset of information in an electronic format that
allows it to be retrieved or transmitted.
Information means any communication or representation of
knowledge such as facts, data, or opinions, in any medium or form,
including textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or
audiovisual.
Information system means a discrete set of information resources
organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing,
dissemination, or disposition of information (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Intrusion means an unauthorized act of bypassing the security
mechanisms of a system.
Media means physical devices or writing surfaces including but
not limited to magnetic tapes, optical disks, magnetic disks, large
scale integration memory chips, and printouts (but not including
display media, e.g., a computer monitor, cathode ray tube (CRT) or
other (transient) visual output) onto which information is recorded,
stored, or printed within an information system.
Public information means any information, regardless of form or
format, that an agency discloses, disseminates, or makes available
to the public (44 U.S.C. 3502).
Safeguarding means measures or controls that are prescribed to
protect information.
Voice means all oral information regardless of transmission
protocol.
(b) Safeguarding requirements and procedures. The Contractor
shall apply the following basic safeguarding requirements to protect
information provided by or generated for the Government (other than
public information) which resides on or transits through its
information systems from unauthorized access and disclosure:
(1) Protecting information on public computers or Web sites: Do
not process information provided by or generated for the Government
(other than public information) on public computers (e.g., those
available for use by the general public in kiosks, hotel business
centers) or computers that do not have access control. Information
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information) shall not be posted on Web sites that are publicly
available or have access limited only by domain/Internet Protocol
restriction. Such information may be posted to web pages that
control access by user ID/password, user certificates, or other
technical means, and that provide protection via use of security
technologies. Access control may be provided by the intranet (versus
the Web site itself or the application it hosts).
(2) Transmitting electronic information. Transmit email, text
messages, blogs, and similar communications that contain information
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information), using technology and processes that provide the best
level of security and privacy available, given facilities,
conditions, and environment.
(3) Transmitting voice and fax information. Transmit information
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information), via voice and fax only when the sender has a
reasonable assurance that access is limited to authorized
recipients.
(4) Physical and electronic barriers. Protect information
provided by or generated for the Government (other than public
information), by at least one physical and one electronic barrier
(e.g., locked container or room, login and password) when not under
direct individual control.
(5) Sanitization. At a minimum, clear information on media that
have been used to process information provided by or generated for
the Government (other than public information), before external
release or disposal. Overwriting is an acceptable means of clearing
media in accordance with National Institute of Standards and
Technology 800-88, Guidelines for Media Sanitization, at https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-88/NISTSP800-88_rev1.pdf.
(6) Intrusion protection. Provide at a minimum the following
protections against computer intrusions and data compromise:
(i) Current and regularly updated malware protection services,
e.g., anti-virus, anti-spyware.
(ii) Prompt application of security-relevant software upgrades,
e.g., patches, service-packs, and hot fixes.
(7) Transfer limitations. Transfer information provided by or
generated for the Government (other than public information), only
to those subcontractors that both require the information for
purposes of contract performance and provide at least the same level
of security as specified in this clause.
(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of
this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts under
this contract that may have information residing in or transiting
through its information system, where such is provided by or
generated for the Government (other than public information).
(d) Other contractual requirements regarding the safeguarding of
information. This clause addresses basic requirements, and is
subordinate to any other contract clauses or requirements that
specifically address the safeguarding of information or information
systems. If any restrictions or authorizations in this clause are
inconsistent with a requirement of any other such clause in this
contract, the requirement of the other clause shall take precedence
over the requirement of this clause.
[FR Doc. 2012-20881 Filed 8-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P