Medicare Program; Approved Renewal of Deeming Authority of the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. for Medicare Advantage Health Maintenance Organizations and Local Preferred Provider Organizations, 51540-51542 [2012-20195]
Download as PDF
51540
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
designated OPO (for the service area in
which it is located) of potential organ
donors. Under section 1138(a)(1)(C) of
the Act, every participating hospital
must have an agreement only with its
designated OPO to identify potential
donors.
However, section 1138(a)(2)(A) of the
Act provides that a hospital may obtain
a waiver of the above requirements from
the Secretary under certain specified
conditions. A waiver allows the hospital
to have an agreement with an OPO other
than the one initially designated by
CMS, if the hospital meets certain
conditions specified in section
1138(a)(2)(A) of the Act. In addition, the
Secretary may review additional criteria
described in section 1138(a)(2)(B) of the
Act to evaluate the hospital’s request for
a waiver.
Section 1138(a)(2)(A) of the Act states
that in granting a waiver, the Secretary
must determine that the waiver—(1) is
expected to increase organ donations;
and (2) will ensure equitable treatment
of patients referred for transplants
within the service area served by the
designated OPO and within the service
area served by the OPO with which the
hospital seeks to enter into an
agreement under the waiver. In making
a waiver determination, section
1138(a)(2)(B) of the Act provides that
the Secretary may consider, among
other factors: (1) Cost-effectiveness; (2)
improvements in quality; (3) whether
there has been any change in a
hospital’s designated OPO due to the
changes made in definitions for
metropolitan statistical areas; and (4)
the length and continuity of a hospital’s
relationship with an OPO other than the
hospital’s designated OPO. Under
section 1138(a)(2)(D) of the Act, the
Secretary is required to publish a notice
of any waiver application received from
a hospital within 30 days of receiving
the application, and to offer interested
parties an opportunity to submit
comments during the 60-day comment
period beginning on the publication
date in the Federal Register.
The criteria that the Secretary uses to
evaluate the waiver in these cases are
the same as those described above under
sections 1138(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Act
and have been incorporated into the
regulations at § 486.308(e) and (f).
II. Waiver Request Procedures
On October 1995, we issued a
Program Memorandum (Transmittal No.
A–95–11) detailing the waiver process
and discussing the information
hospitals must provide in requesting a
waiver. We indicated that upon receipt
of a waiver request, we would publish
a Federal Register notice to solicit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
public comments, as required by section
1138(a)(2)(D) of the Act.
According to these requirements, we
will review the comments received.
During the review process, we may
consult on an as-needed basis with the
Health Resources and Services
Administration’s Division of
Transplantation, the United Network for
Organ Sharing, and our regional offices.
If necessary, we may request additional
clarifying information from the applying
hospital or others. We will then make a
final determination on the waiver
request and notify the hospital and the
designated and requested OPOs.
III. Hospital Waiver Request
As permitted by 42 CFR 486.308(e),
the following hospital has requested a
waiver in order to enter into an
agreement with a designated OPO other
than the OPO designated for the service
area in which the hospital is located:
Tri-Lakes Medical Center in
Batesville, Mississippi, is requesting a
waiver to work with: Mississippi Organ
Recovery Agency, 12 River Bend Pl.,
Flowood, MS 39232.
The Hospital’s Designated OPO is:
Mid-South Transplant Foundation, Inc.,
8001 Centerview Parkway, Suite 302,
Memphis, TN 38018.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; Program No. 93.774, Medicare—
Supplementary Medical Insurance, and
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
Dated: August 20, 2012.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2012–20920 Filed 8–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–4166–FN]
Medicare Program; Approved Renewal
of Deeming Authority of the
Accreditation Association for
Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. for
Medicare Advantage Health
Maintenance Organizations and Local
Preferred Provider Organizations
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces our
decision to renew the Medicare
Advantage ‘‘deeming authority’’ of the
Accreditation Association for
Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. (AAAHC)
for Health Maintenance Organizations
and Preferred Provider Organizations for
a term of 6 years.
DATES: This final notice is effective
through July 10, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Abraham Weinschneider, (410) 786–
5688; or Edgar Gallardo, (410) 786–
0361.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the Medicare program, eligible
beneficiaries may receive covered
services through a Medicare Advantage
(MA) organization that contracts with
CMS. The regulations specifying the
Medicare requirements that must be met
for a Medicare Advantage Organization
(MAO) to enter into a contract with
CMS are located at 42 CFR part 422.
These regulations implement Part C of
Title XVIII of the Social Security Act
(the Act), which specifies the services
that an MAO must provide and the
requirements that the organization must
meet to be an MA contractor. Other
relevant sections of the Act are Parts A
and B of Title XVIII and Part A of Title
XI pertaining to the provision of
services by Medicare-certified providers
and suppliers. Generally, for an entity to
be an MA organization, the organization
must be licensed by the State as a riskbearing organization as set forth in part
422.
As a method of assuring compliance
with certain Medicare requirements, an
MA organization may choose to become
accredited by a CMS-approved
accrediting organization (AO). Once
accredited by such a CMS-approved AO,
we deem the MA organization to be
compliant in one or more of six
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Notices
requirements set forth in section
1852(e)(4)(B) of the Act. For an AO to
be able to ‘‘deem’’ an MA plan
compliant with these MA requirements,
the AO must prove to CMS that its
standards are at least as stringent as
Medicare requirements. Health
maintenance organizations (HMOs) or
preferred provider organizations (PPOs)
accredited by an approved AO may
receive, at their request, ‘‘deemed’’
status for CMS requirements with
respect to the following six MA criteria:
Quality Improvement;
Antidiscrimination; Access to Services;
Confidentiality and Accuracy of
Enrollee Records; Information on
Advanced Directives; and Provider
Participation Rules. (See 42 CFR
422.156(b)). At this time, recognition of
accreditation does not include the Part
D areas of review set out at § 423.165(b).
AOs that apply for MA deeming
authority are generally recognized by
the health care industry as entities that
accredit HMOs and PPOs. As we specify
at § 422.157(b)(2)(ii), the term for which
an AO may be approved by CMS may
not exceed 6 years. For continuing
approval, the AO must apply to CMS to
renew its ‘‘deeming authority’’ for a
subsequent approval period.
The Accreditation Association for
Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. (AAAHC)
was approved by CMS as an
accreditation organization for MA
HMOs and PPOs on July 12, 2006, and
that term will expire on July 11, 2012.
On December 14, 2011, AAAHC
submitted an application to renew its
deeming authority. On that same date,
AAAHC submitted materials requested
from CMS which included updates and/
or changes to items set out in Federal
regulations at § 422.158(a) that are
prerequisites for receiving approval of
its accreditation program from CMS,
and which were furnished to CMS by
AAAHC as a part of their renewal
applications for HMOs and PPOs.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
II. Deeming Applications Approval
Process
Section 1865(a)(3)(A) of the Act
provides a statutory timetable to ensure
that our review of deeming applications
is conducted in a timely manner. The
Act provides us with 210 calendar days
after the date of receipt of an application
to complete our survey activities and
application review process. Within 60
days of receiving a completed
application, we must publish a notice in
the Federal Register that identifies the
national accreditation body making the
request, describes the request, and
provides no less than a 30-day public
comment period. At the end of the 210-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
day period, we must publish an
approval or denial of the application.
III. Proposed Notice
In the March 30, 2012, Federal
Register (76 FR 19290), we published a
proposed notice announcing AAAHC’s
request for continued CMS approval of
its deeming authority for MA HMOs and
PPOs. In the proposed notice, we
detailed our evaluation criteria. Under
section 1852(e)(4) of the Act and our
regulations at § 422.158 (Federal review
of accrediting organizations), we
conducted a review of AAAHC’s
application in accordance with the
criteria specified by our regulations,
which include, but are not limited to the
following:
• The types of MA plans that it would
review as part of its accreditation
process.
• A detailed comparison of the
organization’s accreditation
requirements and standards with the
Medicare requirements (for example, a
crosswalk).
• Detailed information about the
organization’s survey process, including
the following—
++ Frequency of surveys and whether
surveys are announced or unannounced.
++ Copies of survey forms, and
guidelines and instructions to
surveyors.
++ Descriptions of—
—The survey review process and the
accreditation status decision making
process;
—The procedures used to notify
accredited MA organizations of
deficiencies and to monitor the
correction of those deficiencies; and
—The procedures used to enforce
compliance with accreditation
requirements.
• Detailed information about the
individuals who perform surveys for the
accreditation organization, including
the following—
++ The size and composition of
accreditation survey teams for each type
of plan reviewed as part of the
accreditation process;
++ The education and experience
requirements surveyors must meet;
++ The content and frequency of the
in-service training provided to survey
personnel;
++ The evaluation systems used to
monitor the performance of individual
surveyors and survey teams; and
++ The organization’s policies and
practice with respect to the
participation, in surveys or in the
accreditation decision process by an
individual who is professionally or
financially affiliated with the entity
being surveyed.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51541
• A description of the organization’s
data management and analysis system
with respect to its surveys and
accreditation decisions, including the
kinds of reports, tables, and other
displays generated by that system.
• A description of the organization’s
procedures for responding to and
investigating complaints against
accredited organizations, including
policies and procedures regarding
coordination of these activities with
appropriate licensing bodies and
ombudsmen programs.
• A description of the organization’s
policies and procedures with respect to
the withholding or removal of
accreditation for failure to meet the
accreditation organization’s standards or
requirements, and other actions the
organization takes in response to
noncompliance with its standards and
requirements.
• A description of all types (for
example, full, partial) and categories (for
example, provisional, conditional,
temporary) of accreditation offered by
the organization, the duration of each
type and category of accreditation and a
statement identifying the types and
categories that would serve as a basis for
accreditation if CMS approves the
accreditation organization.
• A list of all currently accredited MA
organizations and the type, category,
and expiration date of the accreditation
held by each of them.
• A list of all full and partial
accreditation surveys scheduled to be
performed by the accreditation
organization as requested by CMS.
• The name and address of each
person with an ownership or control
interest in the accreditation
organization.
• CMS also considers AAAHC’s past
performance in the deeming program
and results of recent deeming validation
reviews, or look-behind audits
conducted as part of continuing Federal
oversight of the deeming program under
§ 422.157(d).
In accordance with section
1865(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the March 30,
2012 proposed notice (76 FR 19290) also
solicited public comments regarding
whether AAAHC’s requirements met or
exceeded the Medicare conditions of
participation as an accrediting
organization for MA HMOs and PPOs.
We received no public comments in
response to our proposed notice.
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
51542
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Notices
Dated: August 9, 2012.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
IV. Provisions of the Final Notice
A. Differences Between AAAHC’s
Standards and Requirements for
Accreditation and Medicare’s
Conditions and Survey Requirements
[FR Doc. 2012–20195 Filed 8–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
We compared the standards and
survey process contained in AAAHC’s
application with the Medicare
conditions for accreditation. Our review
and evaluation of AAAHC’s application
for continued CMS-approval were
conducted as described in section III of
this final notice, and yielded the
following:
• To meet the requirements at
§ 488.10(b), AAAHC modified its
policies to include ‘‘person(s) receiving
hospice benefits prior to completing an
enrollment request for an MSA plan’’ as
an exception where an MAO may deny
enrollment based on medical status.
• AAAHC amended its crosswalk to
ensure current AAAHC standards are
clearly crosswalked to the following
regulatory requirements:
§§ 422.112(a)(7); 422.118(d);
422.202(d)(1); and 422.204(b)(2).
• To meet the amendments made at
§ 422.156 by the final rule published in
the April 15, 2011 Federal Register (76
CFR 21498), AAAHC removed Quality
Improvement Projects and Chronic Care
Improvement Programs from its
deeming process.
B. Term of Approval
Based on the review and observations
described in section III of this final
notice, we have determined that
AAAHC’s accreditation program
requirements meet or exceed our
requirements. Therefore, we approve
AAAHC as a national accreditation
organization with deeming authority for
MA HMOs and PPOs, effective July 11,
2012 through July 10, 2018.
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
Authority: Section 1865 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395bb).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program; No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance Program; and No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplemental Medical Insurance
Program).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1596–N]
Medicare Program; Solicitation of Two
Nominations to the Advisory Panel on
Hospital Outpatient Payment
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice solicits
nominations for two new members to
the Advisory Panel on Hospital
Outpatient Payment (HOP, the Panel).
There will be two vacancies on the
Panel beginning September 30, 2012.
The purpose of the Panel is to advise
the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS)
(the Secretary) and the Administrator of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) (the Administrator) on
the clinical integrity of the Ambulatory
Payment Classification (APC) groups
and their associated weights, and
supervision of hospital outpatient
services.
The Secretary rechartered the Panel in
2011 for a 2-year period effective
through November 15, 2013.
DATES: Submission of Nominations: We
will consider nominations if they are
received no later than 5 p.m. (e.s.t.)
October 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Please mail or hand deliver
nominations to the following address:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services; Attn: Raymond Bulls,
Advisory Panel on HOP; Center for
Medicare, Hospital & Ambulatory Policy
Group, Division of Outpatient Care;
7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop C4–
05–17; Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Web site: For additional information
on the Panel and updates to the Panel’s
activities, we refer readers to our Web
site at the following: https://
www.cms.gov/RegulationsandGuidance/Guidance/FACA/
AdvisoryPanelonAmbulatoryPayment
ClassificationGroups.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact: Persons wishing to nominate
individuals to serve on the Panel or to
obtain further information may also
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contact Raymond Bulls at the following
email address: APCPanel@cms.hhs.gov
or call 410–786–7267.
Advisory Committees’ Information
Lines: You may also refer to the CMS
Federal Advisory Committee Hotlines at
1–877–449–5659 (toll-free) or 410–786–
3985 (local) for additional information.
News Media: Representatives should
contact the CMS Press Office at 202–
690–6145.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Secretary is required by section
1833(t)(9)(A) of the Social Security Act
(the Act), and section 222 of the Public
Health Service Act (PHS Act) to consult
with an expert outside advisory panel
regarding the clinical integrity of the
APC groups and relative payment
weights that are components of the
Medicare Hospital Outpatient
Prospective Payment System (OPPS),
and the appropriate supervision level
for hospital outpatient services. The
panel may use data collected or
developed by entities and organizations
(other than DHHS) in conducting the
review. The Panel is governed by the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) (Public Law 92–
463), as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2),
which sets forth standards for the
formation and use of advisory panels.
The Charter requires that the Panel
meet up to three times annually. CMS
considers the technical advice provided
by the Panel as we prepare the proposed
and final rules to update the OPPS for
the following calendar year.
The Panel shall consist of a chair and
up to 19 members who are full-time
employees of hospitals, hospital
systems, or other Medicare providers
that are subject to the OPPS. (For
purposes of the Panel, consultants or
independent contractors are not
considered to be full-time employees in
these organizations.)
The current Panel members are as
follows: (Note: The asterisk [*] indicates
the Panel members whose terms end on
September 30, 2012.)
• E. L. Hambrick, M.D., J.D., Chair, a
CMS Medical Officer
• Karen Borman, M.D.
• Ruth L. Bush, M.D., M.P.H.
• Lanny Copeland, M.D.
• Kari S. Cornicelli, C.P.A., FHFMA
• Dawn L. Francis, M.D., M.H.S.
• David A. Halsey, M.D.
• Brain D. Kavanagh, M.D., M.P.H.
• Judith T. Kelly, B.S.H.A., RHIT, RHIA,
CCS*
• Scott Manaker, M.D., Ph.D.
• John Marshall, CRA, RCC, RT
• Jim Nelson
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51540-51542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20195]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-4166-FN]
Medicare Program; Approved Renewal of Deeming Authority of the
Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. for Medicare
Advantage Health Maintenance Organizations and Local Preferred Provider
Organizations
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces our decision to renew the Medicare
Advantage ``deeming authority'' of the Accreditation Association for
Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. (AAAHC) for Health Maintenance
Organizations and Preferred Provider Organizations for a term of 6
years.
DATES: This final notice is effective through July 10, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abraham Weinschneider, (410) 786-5688;
or Edgar Gallardo, (410) 786-0361.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the Medicare program, eligible beneficiaries may receive
covered services through a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization that
contracts with CMS. The regulations specifying the Medicare
requirements that must be met for a Medicare Advantage Organization
(MAO) to enter into a contract with CMS are located at 42 CFR part 422.
These regulations implement Part C of Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act (the Act), which specifies the services that an MAO must
provide and the requirements that the organization must meet to be an
MA contractor. Other relevant sections of the Act are Parts A and B of
Title XVIII and Part A of Title XI pertaining to the provision of
services by Medicare-certified providers and suppliers. Generally, for
an entity to be an MA organization, the organization must be licensed
by the State as a risk-bearing organization as set forth in part 422.
As a method of assuring compliance with certain Medicare
requirements, an MA organization may choose to become accredited by a
CMS-approved accrediting organization (AO). Once accredited by such a
CMS-approved AO, we deem the MA organization to be compliant in one or
more of six
[[Page 51541]]
requirements set forth in section 1852(e)(4)(B) of the Act. For an AO
to be able to ``deem'' an MA plan compliant with these MA requirements,
the AO must prove to CMS that its standards are at least as stringent
as Medicare requirements. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) or
preferred provider organizations (PPOs) accredited by an approved AO
may receive, at their request, ``deemed'' status for CMS requirements
with respect to the following six MA criteria: Quality Improvement;
Antidiscrimination; Access to Services; Confidentiality and Accuracy of
Enrollee Records; Information on Advanced Directives; and Provider
Participation Rules. (See 42 CFR 422.156(b)). At this time, recognition
of accreditation does not include the Part D areas of review set out at
Sec. 423.165(b). AOs that apply for MA deeming authority are generally
recognized by the health care industry as entities that accredit HMOs
and PPOs. As we specify at Sec. 422.157(b)(2)(ii), the term for which
an AO may be approved by CMS may not exceed 6 years. For continuing
approval, the AO must apply to CMS to renew its ``deeming authority''
for a subsequent approval period.
The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc.
(AAAHC) was approved by CMS as an accreditation organization for MA
HMOs and PPOs on July 12, 2006, and that term will expire on July 11,
2012. On December 14, 2011, AAAHC submitted an application to renew its
deeming authority. On that same date, AAAHC submitted materials
requested from CMS which included updates and/or changes to items set
out in Federal regulations at Sec. 422.158(a) that are prerequisites
for receiving approval of its accreditation program from CMS, and which
were furnished to CMS by AAAHC as a part of their renewal applications
for HMOs and PPOs.
II. Deeming Applications Approval Process
Section 1865(a)(3)(A) of the Act provides a statutory timetable to
ensure that our review of deeming applications is conducted in a timely
manner. The Act provides us with 210 calendar days after the date of
receipt of an application to complete our survey activities and
application review process. Within 60 days of receiving a completed
application, we must publish a notice in the Federal Register that
identifies the national accreditation body making the request,
describes the request, and provides no less than a 30-day public
comment period. At the end of the 210-day period, we must publish an
approval or denial of the application.
III. Proposed Notice
In the March 30, 2012, Federal Register (76 FR 19290), we published
a proposed notice announcing AAAHC's request for continued CMS approval
of its deeming authority for MA HMOs and PPOs. In the proposed notice,
we detailed our evaluation criteria. Under section 1852(e)(4) of the
Act and our regulations at Sec. 422.158 (Federal review of accrediting
organizations), we conducted a review of AAAHC's application in
accordance with the criteria specified by our regulations, which
include, but are not limited to the following:
The types of MA plans that it would review as part of its
accreditation process.
A detailed comparison of the organization's accreditation
requirements and standards with the Medicare requirements (for example,
a crosswalk).
Detailed information about the organization's survey
process, including the following--
++ Frequency of surveys and whether surveys are announced or
unannounced.
++ Copies of survey forms, and guidelines and instructions to
surveyors.
++ Descriptions of--
--The survey review process and the accreditation status decision
making process;
--The procedures used to notify accredited MA organizations of
deficiencies and to monitor the correction of those deficiencies; and
--The procedures used to enforce compliance with accreditation
requirements.
Detailed information about the individuals who perform
surveys for the accreditation organization, including the following--
++ The size and composition of accreditation survey teams for each
type of plan reviewed as part of the accreditation process;
++ The education and experience requirements surveyors must meet;
++ The content and frequency of the in-service training provided to
survey personnel;
++ The evaluation systems used to monitor the performance of
individual surveyors and survey teams; and
++ The organization's policies and practice with respect to the
participation, in surveys or in the accreditation decision process by
an individual who is professionally or financially affiliated with the
entity being surveyed.
A description of the organization's data management and
analysis system with respect to its surveys and accreditation
decisions, including the kinds of reports, tables, and other displays
generated by that system.
A description of the organization's procedures for
responding to and investigating complaints against accredited
organizations, including policies and procedures regarding coordination
of these activities with appropriate licensing bodies and ombudsmen
programs.
A description of the organization's policies and
procedures with respect to the withholding or removal of accreditation
for failure to meet the accreditation organization's standards or
requirements, and other actions the organization takes in response to
noncompliance with its standards and requirements.
A description of all types (for example, full, partial)
and categories (for example, provisional, conditional, temporary) of
accreditation offered by the organization, the duration of each type
and category of accreditation and a statement identifying the types and
categories that would serve as a basis for accreditation if CMS
approves the accreditation organization.
A list of all currently accredited MA organizations and
the type, category, and expiration date of the accreditation held by
each of them.
A list of all full and partial accreditation surveys
scheduled to be performed by the accreditation organization as
requested by CMS.
The name and address of each person with an ownership or
control interest in the accreditation organization.
CMS also considers AAAHC's past performance in the deeming
program and results of recent deeming validation reviews, or look-
behind audits conducted as part of continuing Federal oversight of the
deeming program under Sec. 422.157(d).
In accordance with section 1865(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the March 30,
2012 proposed notice (76 FR 19290) also solicited public comments
regarding whether AAAHC's requirements met or exceeded the Medicare
conditions of participation as an accrediting organization for MA HMOs
and PPOs. We received no public comments in response to our proposed
notice.
[[Page 51542]]
IV. Provisions of the Final Notice
A. Differences Between AAAHC's Standards and Requirements for
Accreditation and Medicare's Conditions and Survey Requirements
We compared the standards and survey process contained in AAAHC's
application with the Medicare conditions for accreditation. Our review
and evaluation of AAAHC's application for continued CMS-approval were
conducted as described in section III of this final notice, and yielded
the following:
To meet the requirements at Sec. 488.10(b), AAAHC
modified its policies to include ``person(s) receiving hospice benefits
prior to completing an enrollment request for an MSA plan'' as an
exception where an MAO may deny enrollment based on medical status.
AAAHC amended its crosswalk to ensure current AAAHC
standards are clearly crosswalked to the following regulatory
requirements: Sec. Sec. 422.112(a)(7); 422.118(d); 422.202(d)(1); and
422.204(b)(2).
To meet the amendments made at Sec. 422.156 by the final
rule published in the April 15, 2011 Federal Register (76 CFR 21498),
AAAHC removed Quality Improvement Projects and Chronic Care Improvement
Programs from its deeming process.
B. Term of Approval
Based on the review and observations described in section III of
this final notice, we have determined that AAAHC's accreditation
program requirements meet or exceed our requirements. Therefore, we
approve AAAHC as a national accreditation organization with deeming
authority for MA HMOs and PPOs, effective July 11, 2012 through July
10, 2018.
V. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35).
Authority: Section 1865 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395bb).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program; No. 93.773, Medicare--Hospital Insurance
Program; and No. 93.774, Medicare--Supplemental Medical Insurance
Program).
Dated: August 9, 2012.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-20195 Filed 8-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P