2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and Confidentiality Determinations for Certain Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source Category, 51477-51495 [2012-19957]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a temporary safety zone
that will be enforced for no more than
1.25 hours. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0727 to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T07–0727 Safety Zone; Apache Pier,
Myrtle Beach, SC.
(a) Regulated Area. The Coast Guard
is establishing a temporary safety zone
with a 1000 foot radius around Apache
Pier, Myrtle Beach, SC in approximate
position 33°45′41.26″ N, 078°46′47.52″
W. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Charleston by
telephone at 843–740–7050, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area is granted by the Captain
of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Marine
Safety Information Bulletins, Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 9 p.m. on September 1,
2012, until 10:15 p.m. on September 2,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51477
2012. This rule will only be enforced on
September 2, 2012, if the event is
postponed from September 1, 2012.
Dated: August 12, 2012.
M.F. White,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2012–20832 Filed 8–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 98
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0147; FRL–9714–3]
RIN 2060–AR53
2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying
and Other Amendments to the
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and
Confidentiality Determinations for
Certain Data Elements of the
Fluorinated Gas Source Category
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is amending specific
provisions of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule to provide greater clarity
and flexibility to facilities subject to
reporting emissions from the industrial
waste landfill, petroleum and natural
gas systems, fluorinated gas production,
and electronics manufacturing source
categories. These source categories will
report greenhouse gas data for the first
time in September 2012. The changes do
not significantly change the overall
calculation and monitoring
requirements of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule or add additional
requirements for reporters. The EPA is
also making confidentiality
determinations for four new data
elements for the fluorinated gas
production source category of the
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule. Lastly,
we are finalizing an amendment to the
general provisions to defer the reporting
deadline for a data element used as an
input to an emission equation in the
fluorinated gas production source
category until 2015.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 24, 2012, except for the
amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) and
the confidentiality determinations for
subpart L described in section II.D of the
Supplementary Information, which are
effective on September 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0147. All
documents in the docket are listed in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51478
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and is publicly available
only in hard copy. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC. This Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carole Cook, Climate Change Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC–
6207J), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 343–9263; fax number:
(202) 343–2342; email address:
GHGReportingRule@epa.gov. For
technical information and
implementation materials, please go to
the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule
Program Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/
ghgrulemaking.html. To submit a
question, select Rule Help Center,
followed by ‘‘Contact Us.’’
Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition
to being available in the docket, an
electronic copy of this final rule will
also be available through the WWW.
Following the Administrator’s signature,
a copy of this action will be posted on
the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting
Program Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/
ghgrulemaking.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities. The Administrator
determined that this action is subject to
the provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 307(d). See CAA section
307(d)(1)(V) (the provisions of section
307(d) apply to ‘‘such other actions as
the Administrator may determine’’).
These amended regulations could affect
owners or operators of direct emitters of
GHGs. Regulated categories and affected
entities may include those listed in
Table 1 of this preamble:
TABLE 1—EXAMPLES OF AFFECTED ENTITIES BY CATEGORY
Category
NAICS
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems ..............................
Electronics Manufacturing ................................................
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Fluorinated Gas Production .............................................
Industrial Waste Landfills .................................................
Table 1 of this preamble is not
intended to be exhaustive, but rather
lists the types of facilities that the EPA
is now aware could be potentially
affected by the reporting requirements.
Other types of facilities not listed in the
table could also be affected. To
determine whether you are affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability criteria found
in 40 CFR part 98, subpart A or the
relevant criteria in the sections related
to direct emitters of GHGs. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular facility,
consult the person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
What is the effective date? This final
rule is effective on August 24, 2012,
except for the amendments to 40 CFR
98.3(c)(4) (the subpart A amendments
that affect subpart I) and the
confidentiality determinations for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
486210
221210
211
211112
334111
334413
334419
334419
325120
562212
322110
322121
322122
322130
311611
311411
311421
221320
Examples of affected facilities
Pipeline transportation of natural gas.
Natural gas distribution facilities.
Extractors of crude petroleum and natural gas.
Natural gas liquid extraction facilities.
Microcomputers manufacturing facilities.
Semiconductor, photovoltaic (solid-state) device manufacturing facilities.
LCD unit screens manufacturing facilities.
MEMS manufacturing facilities.
Industrial gases manufacturing facilities.
Solid waste landfills.
Pulp mills.
Paper mills.
Newsprint mills.
Paperboard mills.
Meat processing facilities.
Frozen fruit, juice, and vegetable manufacturing facilities.
Fruit and vegetable canning facilities.
Sewage treatment facilities.
subpart L, which are effective on
September 24, 2012. Section 553(d) of
the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), 5 U.S.C. Chapter 5, generally
provides that rules may not take effect
earlier than 30 days after they are
published in the Federal Register. EPA
is issuing this final rule under section
307(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act, which
states: ‘‘The provisions of section 553
through 557 * * * of Title 5 shall not,
except as expressly provided in this
section, apply to actions to which this
subsection applies.’’ Thus, section
553(d) of the APA does not apply to this
rule. EPA is nevertheless acting
consistently with the purposes
underlying APA section 553(d) in
making the final rule provisions, except
for the amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)
(the subpart A amendments that affect
subpart I) and the subpart L
confidentiality determinations, effective
on August 24, 2012. This final rule,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
except for the amendments to 40 CFR
98.3(c)(4) (the subpart A amendments
that affect subpart I) and the subpart L
confidentiality determinations,
temporarily requires less detailed
reporting under subpart L than would
otherwise have been required by the
November 2010 Subpart L final rule (75
FR 74774), defers the deadline for
reporting a data element used as an
input to emission equations under
subpart L, removes a data reporting
requirement and otherwise provides
flexibilities under subpart W, and
removes the requirement for some
facilities to report under subpart TT. A
shorter effective date in such
circumstances is consistent with the
purposes of APA section 553(d), which
provides an exception for any action
that grants or recognizes an exemption
or relieves a restriction.
Judicial Review. Under section
307(b)(1) of the CAA, judicial review of
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
this final rule is available only by filing
a petition for review in the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (the Court) by October 23, 2012.
Under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B), only
an objection to this final rule that was
raised with reasonable specificity
during the period for public comment
can be raised during judicial review.
Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA also
provides a mechanism for the EPA to
convene a proceeding for
reconsideration, ‘‘[i]f the person raising
an objection can demonstrate to EPA
that it was impracticable to raise such
objection within [the period for public
comment] or if the grounds for such
objection arose after the period for
public comment (but within the time
specified for judicial review) and if such
objection is of central relevance to the
outcome of the rule.’’ Any person
seeking to make such a demonstration to
us should submit a Petition for
Reconsideration to the Office of the
Administrator, Environmental
Protection Agency, Room 3000, Ariel
Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460, with a
copy to the person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section, and the Associate
General Counsel for the Air and
Radiation Law Office, Office of General
Counsel (Mail Code 2344A),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20004. Note, under CAA section
307(b)(2), the requirements established
by this final rule may not be challenged
separately in any civil or criminal
proceedings brought by the EPA to
enforce these requirements.
Acronyms and Abbreviations. The
following acronyms and abbreviations
are used in this document.
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI confidential business information
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CH4 methane
CO2 carbon dioxide
DOC degradable organic carbon
EF emission factor
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FR Federal Register
GHG greenhouse gas
GHGRP Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
kg/ft3 kilograms per cubic foot
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
N2O nitrous oxide
NAICS North American Industry
Classification System
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
psia pounds per square inch absolute
QSARs quantitative structure activity
relationships
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
SF6 sulfur hexafluoride
U.S. United States
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Organization of This Document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
I. Background
A. Organization of This Preamble
B. Background on the Final Rule
C. Legal Authority
D. How do these amendments apply to
2012 reports?
E. How do these amendments affect
confidentiality determinations?
II. Final Amendments and Responses to
Public Comments
A. Subpart A—General Provisions
B. Subpart TT—Industrial Waste Landfills
C. Subpart W—Petroleum and Natural Gas
Systems
D. Subpart L—Fluorinated Gas Production
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
A. Organization of This Preamble
This preamble consists of three
sections. The first section provides
background on 40 CFR part 98 and
describes the purpose and legal
authority for this action.
The second section of this preamble
summarizes the revisions made to the
specific requirements for the general
provisions (subpart A), industrial waste
landfills (subpart TT), petroleum and
natural gas systems (subpart W) and
fluorinated gas production (subpart L) of
40 CFR part 98. It also describes the
major changes made to these source
categories since proposal and provides a
brief summary of significant public
comments and EPA’s responses on
issues specific to each source category.
Additional responses to significant
comments can be found in the
document ‘‘2012 Technical Corrections,
Clarifying and Other Amendments to
the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51479
Confidentiality Determinations for
Certain Data Elements of the
Fluorinated Gas Source Category—
Responses to Public Comment’’ in the
docket to this rulemaking.
The third section of this preamble
discusses the various statutory and
executive order requirements applicable
to this rulemaking.
B. Background on the Final Rule
This action finalizes amendments to
provisions in 40 CFR part 98, subparts
A, TT, W, and L. The 2009 final GHG
Reporting Rule was published in the
Federal Register on October 30, 2009
(74 FR 56260, hereafter referred to as the
‘‘2009 final rule’’ or ‘‘Part 98’’). The
2009 final rule, which finalized
reporting requirements for 30 source
categories, did not include subparts TT,
W, and L. Subsequent notices were
published in 2010 finalizing the
requirements for subpart TT (75 FR
39736, July 12, 2010), subpart W (75 FR
74458, November 30, 2010), and subpart
L (75 FR 74774, December 1, 2010).
Following the promulgation of these
subparts, the EPA finalized four
technical corrections and clarifying
amendments to these and other subparts
under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting
Program (GHGRP).1
In a separate recent action, the EPA
proposed corrections, clarifying, and
other amendments to subparts A, TT, W,
and L on May 21, 2012 (77 FR 29935),
hereinafter ‘‘2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal.’’ In that action, the EPA
proposed several amendments to
specific provisions in these subparts to
provide greater clarity and flexibility to
facilities subject to reporting in 2012.
The EPA also proposed an amendment
to Table A–7 of subpart A to add a
subpart L data element that was
inadvertently omitted in the final
deferral rule 2 to defer its reporting
deadline until 2015. In this action, the
EPA is finalizing amendments to
provisions in subparts A, TT, W, and L.
On January 10, 2012 (77 FR 1434), the
EPA proposed confidentiality
determinations for data elements
(excluding those used as inputs to
emission equations) in eight subparts of
Part 98, including subpart L. In the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal, the EPA
proposed, among other things, four new
data elements for subpart L and
confidentiality status for those four new
subpart L data elements. In this action,
the EPA is finalizing the addition of four
1 75 FR 66434, October 28, 2010; 75 FR 79092,
December 17, 2010; 76 FR 73866, November 29,
2011; 76 FR 80554, December 23, 2011.
2 76 FR 53057, August 25, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51480
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
new data elements to subpart L and
their confidentiality determinations.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
C. Legal Authority
The EPA is promulgating these rule
amendments under its existing CAA
authority, specifically authorities
provided in CAA section 114. As stated
in the preamble to the 2009 final rule
(74 FR 56260, October 30, 2009) and the
Response to Comments on the April 10,
2009 initial proposed rule,3 Volume 9,
Legal Issues, CAA section 114 provides
the EPA broad authority to require the
information proposed to be gathered by
this rule because such data would
inform and are relevant to the EPA’s
carrying out a wide variety of CAA
provisions. As discussed in the
preamble to the initial proposed rule (74
FR 16448, April 10, 2009), CAA section
114(a)(1) authorizes the Administrator
to require emissions sources, persons
subject to the CAA, manufacturers of
control or process equipment, or
persons who the Administrator believes
may have necessary information to
monitor and report emissions and
provide such other information the
Administrator requests for the purposes
of carrying out any provision of the
CAA. For further information about the
EPA’s legal authority, see the preambles
to the 2009 proposed and final rules and
EPA’s Response to Comments, Volume
9.
In addition, the EPA is making
confidentiality determinations for four
data elements in subpart L, under its
authorities provided in sections 114,
301, and 307 of the CAA. As mentioned
above, CAA section 114 provides the
EPA authority to obtain the information
in Part 98, including the four new data
elements we have added to subpart L.
Section 114(c) requires that the EPA
make information obtained under
section 114 publicly available, except
where information qualifies for
confidential treatment. Section 114(c)
excludes emission data from qualifying
for confidential treatment. The
Administrator has determined that this
action (amendment and confidentiality
determination) is subject to the
provisions of section 307(d) of the CAA.
D. How do these amendments apply to
2012 reports?
As explained in the preamble to the
2012 Technical Corrections Proposal,
our response to comments, and this
notice, we believe that it is feasible for
reporters to implement the changes for
the 2011 reporting year, for which
reports are due by September 28, 2012.
3 See https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/
emissions/responses.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
The revisions that apply to the reporting
for 2011 are primarily technical
corrections, and provide clarification
regarding the existing regulatory
requirements or reduce the amount of
information that is required to be
reported.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart
A, the amendment is merely a
harmonizing change to a technical
correction finalized in February 2012 for
subpart I (see 77 FR 10373). This change
is effective for reporting year 2012 and
does not affect reporting year 2011. The
February 2012 subpart I technical
correction required reporters to
calculate emissions of certain additional
fluorinated heat transfer fluids under
subpart I; however, the February 2012
correction inadvertently omitted an
amendment to a corresponding
requirement in subpart A to include
those calculated emissions in the annual
GHG report. This action corrects this
omission by requiring that reporters
include these emissions from heat
transfer fluids in their facility level
totals reported to the EPA in the annual
GHG report. Additionally, as proposed,
this rule adds one data element to Table
A–7 to Subpart A (Table A–7 lists data
elements whose reporting deadline is
deferred until 2015). This element was
inadvertently omitted in the final
deferral rule defers the reporting of one
additional input until 2015. Because
this reduces the reporting requirements,
the EPA has determined that it is
feasible for this amendment to apply to
the reporting year 2011; therefore this
data element would not need to be
reported until 2015.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart
TT, this final rule excludes some
facilities from the reporting
requirements and reduces the burden by
making it easier for facilities to
determine applicability of subpart TT
under the GHG Reporting Rule. The
excluded facilities are not expected to
emit GHGs since they receive only inert
wastes that do not generate methane.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart
W, the amendments include technical
corrections that, while important to
allow reporters to calculate emissions
accurately, do not materially affect the
actions facilities must take to comply
with the rule. For example, in this
action the EPA has corrected the
emission factors in Table W–1A of
subpart W for the onshore petroleum
and natural gas production segment,
due to an error in the December 23,
2011 Technical Revisions to the
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Category of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule (76 FR 80554, December
23, 2011, referred to hereinafter as the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘December 2011 technical corrections
final rule’’), where EPA incorrectly
revised several of the emission factors in
this table. This final rule corrects this
error but does not materially affect the
actions a facility must undertake to
comply with subpart W.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart
L, facilities subject to subpart L will
report greenhouse gas emissions in a
more aggregated manner in 2012 and
2013. This amendment is temporary
(i.e., for 2012 and 2013 only) to allow
the EPA time to fully evaluate concerns
recently raised by stakeholders
regarding reporting, and subsequent
EPA release, of certain emission data.
As explained above, we have
concluded that it is appropriate to have
these amendments to subpart A, Table
A–7 and subparts TT and W apply to
the 2011 reporting year, for which
reporting occurs on September 28, 2012.
For additional background information
regarding some of these amendments,
please refer to the Technical Support
Document for the 2012 Technical
Corrections, Clarifying and Other
Amendments to Certain Provisions of
the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule
proposal, available in the docket for this
rulemaking (EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–
0147–0041).
E. How do these amendments affect
confidentiality determinations?
The amendments in this action do not
affect the confidentiality determinations
for subpart A data elements finalized in
the ‘‘Confidentiality Determinations for
Data Required Under the Mandatory
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and
Amendments to Special Rules
Governing Certain Information Obtained
Under the Clean Air Act,’’ 4 (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘2011 Final CBI rule’’)
or the proposed determinations for
subparts W,5 L,6 and TT.7 In this notice,
we are also finalizing confidentiality
determinations for the four new subpart
L data elements also added in this rule.
The confidentiality determinations for
these new data elements together with
4 See
75 FR 30782, May 26, 2011.
77 FR 11039, February 24, 2012.
6 See 77 FR 1434, January 10, 2012.
7 See 75 FR 30782, May 26, 2011 for final
confidentiality determination for subpart TT. See 77
FR 1434, January 10, 2012 for proposed
confidentiality determinations for new subpart TT
data elements added by the December 2011
technical corrections final rule subsequent to the
final confidentiality determinations made in 75 FR
30782. For the final determinations for the new
subpart TT data elements, see the recently signed
action titled Final Confidentiality Determinations
For Nine Subparts and Amendments to Subparts A
and I Under the Mandatory Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases Rule.
5 See
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
our rationale are discussed in Section
II.D.1 of this preamble.
This rule does not include
confidentiality determinations for
subparts A, W, and TT. For the subpart
A amendments, we are not making any
confidentiality determinations because
the data element being added is a subset
of another data element in subpart I for
which we have already proposed a CBI
determination. Additionally, we are not
making any confidentiality
determination at this time for the
subpart L data element added to Table
A–7 of subpart A to defer the deadline
for reporting until 2015. For subpart W,
in addition to deleting an existing data
element, the amendments in this action
make only minor clarifications to the
existing reporting requirements in that
subpart, which do not change the type
of data to be reported. Therefore, there
is no change to the proposed
confidentiality determinations for the
data elements in that subpart. There are
no amendments to the reporting
requirements for subpart TT.
II. Final Amendments and Responses to
Public Comments
In this action, the EPA is amending
several provisions in subparts A, TT, W,
and L of 40 CFR part 98 to provide
greater clarity and flexibility. The
amendments are listed in this section by
subpart, followed by a more detailed
summary of the final amendments to the
various provisions and the EPA’s
responses to major comments submitted
on those amendments. We indicate
where an amendment is being finalized
as proposed and where an amendment
differs from that which was proposed in
the 2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal. For additional comments and
EPA’s response to those comments
please see the comment response
document available in Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0147.
A. Subpart A—General Provisions
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
1. Summary of Final Amendments
As proposed, this action amends the
general reporting requirements of 40
CFR 98.3(c)(4) of subpart A, which
specifies the types of data and format for
reporting emissions in the annual GHG
reports (e.g., annual emissions from
each source category by GHG). In
addition to the proposed amendments to
98.3(c)(4), EPA has included one
additional edit to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) that
did not appear in the proposal. This
additional amendment adds the text
‘‘and each fluorinated heat transfer fluid
(as defined in § 98.98)’’ to the
introductory sentence of 40 CFR
98.3(c)(4). Although this edit was not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal, it is being added
as a clarifying change to the regulatory
language. EPA has determined that this
additional edit does not substantively
change the amendments that were
proposed and is administrative in
nature. The amendment to subpart A
that was proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections proposal specifies that
facilities subject to subpart I must
include all fluorinated HTFs listed in
Table A–1 of subpart A in the
computation of CO2e that is required by
40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(i). Specifically,
facilities must report each fluorinated
HTF that is also a fluorinated GHG
under 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(iii)(E) and each
fluorinated HTF that is not a fluorinated
GHG in the new data element, 40 CFR
98.3(c)(4)(iii)(F). This change, effective
for reporting year 2012, conforms with
the amendments to reporting
requirements for heat transfer fluids
(fluorinated HTFs) that were published
on February 22, 2012 (77 FR 10373).
This change simplifies reporting for
facilities and reduces burden by
amending subpart A to be consistent
with the requirements in subpart I.
Given that facilities are already required
to calculate emissions of fluorinated
HTFs under subpart I, reporters already
have the necessary data to comply with
the final rule amendments.
As proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal, we are also
amending Table A–7 to subpart A to add
a subpart L data element used as an
input to an emission equation (Equation
L–6) that was inadvertently omitted in
the final deferral rule. Table A–7 to
subpart A lists the inputs to emission
equations whose reporting deadlines
have been deferred until March 31,
2015. Table A–7 to subpart A is
amended to include the data element,
‘‘the mass of each fluorine-containing
product produced by the process’’ (40
CFR 98.126(b)(7)); as is already the case
with all other subpart L data elements
assigned to the inputs to equations data
category, this change defers the
reporting deadline for this data element
until March 31, 2015.
2. Summary of Comments and
Responses
We received no comments on the
proposed amendments to subpart A.
B. Subpart TT—Industrial Waste
Landfills
1. Summary of Final Amendments
As proposed, we are amending
subpart TT to exempt industrial waste
landfills that receive only inert
materials from reporting under this
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51481
subpart. As discussed in the preamble to
the proposed rule (77 FR 29935, May 21,
2012), this amendment ensures that
landfills that are not expected to emit
GHGs are excluded from reporting
under this subpart. Specifically, we are
adding, as proposed, a degradable
organic content (DOC) value exclusion
(provided in weight percent on a wet
basis) as 40 CFR 98.460(c)(2)(xiii).
2. Summary of Comments and
Responses
We received two comments on the
proposed amendment to subpart TT.
Both comments supported EPA’s
proposed amendments.
This section contains a brief summary
of one of the comments received on the
proposed changes to subpart TT and our
response. Additional comments and
responses thereto can be found in the
document, ‘‘Response to Comments:
2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying
and Other Amendments of the
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse
Gases Rule, and Confidentiality
Determinations for Certain Data
Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source
Category’’ (see EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–
0147).
Comment: One commenter requested
clarification on the number of test
results from the use of the anaerobic
biodegradation test that are required to
determine whether or not a facility
meets the definition of the source
category under this subpart.
Response: One representative sample
must be taken and tested using an
anaerobic biodegradation test in order to
determine if a waste stream is inert and
therefore the landfill is exempted from
reporting under 40 CFR
98.460(c)(2)(xiii). This is consistent with
the number of samples required for
determining an exemption using the
volatile solids concentration under 40
CFR 98.460(c)(2)(xii). The EPA agrees
that a clarification is needed because
Part 98 currently does not specify the
number of samples necessary to
determine whether the exemption
applies. Therefore, we have added text
to 40 CFR 98.464(b) to provide this
clarification. The EPA notes that while
only one representative sample must be
taken from each waste stream to be
tested, the anaerobic biodegradation test
must be performed according to the
steps described in 40 CFR 98.464(b)(i),
which requires multiple waste samples
to be tested. Therefore, if only one
representative sample is taken from a
waste stream, the sample taken must be
of sufficient size to be subdivided and
tested according to the requirements in
40 CFR 98.464(b)(i).
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51482
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
C. Subpart W—Petroleum and Natural
Gas Systems
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
1. Summary of Final Amendments
The EPA is finalizing several
technical corrections and amendments
to subpart W as proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal to
correct equations and otherwise clarify
provisions in the rule to ensure
consistency across the calculation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
in subpart W and thereby facilitate
reporting. The EPA is finalizing the
following technical corrections and
amendments as proposed:
• Removing a factor of 1,000 from the
denominator of Equation W–6 in 40 CFR
98.233(e)(5) so that the emissions are
calculated in standard cubic feet rather than
thousand standard cubic feet.
• Providing reporters with the option to
take and use more than the prescribed
number of sample measurements per unique
well tubing diameter and pressure group
combination per sub-basin.
• Changing the parameter ‘‘FRp’’ to ‘‘FR’’
in Equation W–7 in 40 CFR 98.233(f)(1) to
avoid confusion.
• Amending the parameter ‘‘Tp’’ and its
definition in Equation W–7 to clarify that it
refers to the cumulative amount of time in
hours of venting for each well as opposed to
the time for the measured well(s).
• Revising the definition of parameter
‘‘SPp’’ in Equation W–8 in 40 CFR
98.233(f)(2) to clarify that the reporter must
take a ratio of casing to tubing pressure.
• Updating Equation W–8 and also
Equation W–9 in 40 CFR 98.233(f)(2) and
(f)(3) by replacing the subscript ‘‘q’’ with ‘‘p’’
in parameter ‘‘SFR’’ to match the definition
of parameter ‘‘SFRp.’’
• Clarifying that the terms ‘‘Vp’’ and
‘‘HRp,q’’ in Equations W–8 and W–9 are to
be monitored per unloading event.
• Clarifying that Calculation Methodology
3 applies to well venting, not ‘‘each’’ well
venting and that parameter ‘‘W’’ in Equation
W–9 is the total number of wells with
plunger lift assist.
• Revising the term ‘‘backflow’’ to read
‘‘flowback’’ in 40 CFR 98.233(g) and (g)(1).
• Adding subscript ‘‘s’’ to several
parameters in Equations W–10A and W–10B
to clarify that these parameters are at
standard conditions.
• Clarifying that the flow volume variable
‘‘FVs,p’’ in Equation W–10B is at standard
cubic feet.
• Clarifying that the outputs of Equations
W–11A and W–11B are at actual conditions
by inserting the word ‘‘actual’’ in the
definition of flow rate, ‘‘FR,’’ and also adding
a subscript ‘‘a’’ to denote inputs at actual
conditions.
• Adding a reference to Equation W–12 in
40 CFR 98.233(g)(1)(iii) in the parameter
definition ‘‘FRs,p’’ to convert ‘‘FRa’’ to
standard conditions.
• In Equations W–11A and W–11B,
clarifying the definition of orifice cross
sectional area, ‘‘A’’ to state ‘‘Cross sectional
open area of the restriction orifice (m2).’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
(Adding the terms ‘‘open’’ and ‘‘the
restriction.’’)
• Providing reporters with the option to
take and use more than the prescribed
number of sample measurements per subbasin and well type (horizontal or vertical).
• Amending Equation W–13 to clarify that
the output is a sum of emissions from all
completions and workovers without
hydraulic fracturing within a sub-basin.
• Revising parameter ‘‘Es,n’’ in the
parameter description to match the letter case
of the term in Equation W–14B, revising the
term ‘‘Ta’’ to ‘‘Ta,p’’ in Equation W–14B, and
clarifying that the temperature is for each
blowdown ‘‘p.’’
• Revising 40 CFR 98.233(j)(5) to clarify
that the term ‘‘throughput’’ refers to ‘‘average
daily throughput of oil.’’
• Revising the definition of ‘‘Count’’ in
Equation W–15 of 40 CFR 98.233(j)(5) to
clarify that the reporters are to count only the
separators or wells that feed oil directly to
the storage tank.
• Revising the parameter definition of
‘‘1000’’ to accurately describe the conversion
occurring through this parameter.
• Revising the definition of ‘‘PR’’ in
Equation W–17B of 40 CFR 98.233(l)(3) to
clarify that the production rate is in actual
and not standard conditions.
• Removing and reserving 40 CFR
98.233(n)(7) to harmonize the language with
the reporting requirements in 40 CFR 98.236.
• Providing the proper notation for the
summations in Equations W–23, W–24, W–
27, and W–28 so that owners and operators
may correctly calculate GHG emissions from
centrifugal and reciprocating compressors.
• Amending 40 CFR 98.233(o)(7) to
remove the word ‘‘thousand’’ in parameter
‘‘EFi’’ in Equation W–25.
• Revising the definition of parameter EFi
in Equation W–25 in 40 CFR 98.233(o)(7) by
deleting the term ‘‘thousand.’’
• Amending an incorrect reference in 40
CFR 98.233(r)(2) to ‘‘Table W–1A’’ instead of
‘‘Table 1–A.’’
• Revising the phrase ‘‘meter or regulator’’
in 40 CFR 98.233(r)(6)(ii) and replacing it
with ‘‘meter/regulator.’’
• Revising 40 CFR 98.233(t) to clarify that
reporters do not need to alter their
calculation results to standard conditions if
the results already reflect standard
conditions.
• Revising the definition of parameter ‘‘ri’’
in Equation W–36 to amend the density value
of CH4 to be 0.0192 kg/ft3. Replacing the
parameter ‘‘ECO2’’ with ‘‘Ea,CO2’’ in the
parameter definition for Equation W–39A in
40 CFR 98.233(z)(2)(iii) to match the
parameters in the equation.
• Revising the definition of ‘‘HHV’’ in
Equation W–40 in 40 CFR 98.233(z)(2)(vi) to
reflect the ‘‘higher’’ heating value
represented by the acronym.
• Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(5)(ii)(D) to
clarify that the average internal casing
diameter of all wells, as opposed to each
well, must be reported.
• Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(9) to remove
reference to the optical gas imaging
instrument.
• Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13)(iii)(C) to
replace the units of ‘‘cubic feet per hour’’
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with ‘‘metric tons of CO2e for each gas’’ to
align the units of this data reporting element
to those of the general provisions of Part 98,
40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(i), which require reporting
of annual emissions in units of mass in
metric tons of CO2e.
• Updating the incorrect reference to
‘‘Equation W–30’’ in 40 CFR
98.236(c)(15)(i)(B) to read ‘‘Equation W–
30A,’’ updating the incorrect reference to
‘‘Equation W–30’’ in 40 CFR
98.236(c)(15)(i)(C) to read ‘‘Equation W–
30A,’’ and deleting the unnecessary reference
to ‘‘parameter GHGi’’ in 40 CFR
98.236(c)(15)(i)(C).
• Removing the text references to ‘‘(a)(4)’’
and ‘‘W–3’’ in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(15)(ii)(A) by
deleting the unnecessary references to
‘‘(a)(8).’’
• Deleting ‘‘and CH4’’ from the reporting
requirements for EOR injection pumps in 40
CFR 98.236(c)(17)(v) to make the data
reporting requirements consistent with the
calculation procedures in Equation W–37.
• Revising the incorrect title of Table W–
1A of subpart W by deleting ‘‘Table A–1A’’
and correcting it to ‘‘Table W–1A.’’
• Correcting the emission factors in Table
W–1A of subpart W as proposed.
• Amending Table W–5 of subpart W to
provide the cross-reference for footnote 2, by
adding a reference associated with footnote 2
to Vapor Recovery Compressor.
In addition to finalizing the
amendments proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal, the EPA
is finalizing several additional
corrections to address areas where
further clarifications to the subpart W
were considered appropriate based on
comments received on the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal:
• Removing the factors 365 days and ‘‘T’’
from Equation W–6 of subpart W and adding
a new factor ‘‘N’’ for the number of
dehydrator openings in the calendar year.
• Correcting the definition of parameter
‘‘SPp’’ in Equations W–8 to state that casing
pressure is to be measured for wells with no
packer, as opposed to taking the shut-in
pressure or surface pressure measurement for
wells with no packers.
• Correcting the definition of the term
‘‘PRs,p’’ in Equation W–10A to remove the
phrase ‘‘under actual conditions, converted
to standard conditions.’’
• Correcting the definition of the terms
‘‘SGs,p’’ and ‘‘EnFs,p’’ in Equation W–10A to
include omitted subscripts in the parameter
references.
• Correcting the definition of the term ‘‘W’’
in Equation W–12 by replacing the word
‘‘formation’’ with ‘‘combination.’’
• Amending 40 CFR 98.233(o)(5), (o)(6),
(o)(7), (p)(7), and (p)(7)(i) to clarify that the
annual emissions must be estimated for each
compressor for each mode-source
combination measured in the reporting year.
• Correcting the definitions of the terms
‘‘Es,n’’ and ‘‘Ea,n’’ in Equation W–33 by
deleting the parentheses around the terms
‘‘FRs,p’’ and ‘‘FRa,p’’, respectively.
• Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(6),
(c)(13)(i)(G), (c)(13)(ii)(C), (c)(13)(iii)(C),
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(c)(13)(iv), (c)(13)(v)(B), (c)(14)(i)(C),
(c)(14)(ii)(C), (c)(14)(iii)(C), (c)(14)(iv), and
(c)(14)(v)(B) to clarify emission reporting
requirements for compressors.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Since the amendments to subpart W
finalized in this action do not change
the type of information that must be
collected, the methods used to collect
the data, or materially affect how the
emissions are calculated, we are
requiring reporters to implement the
amendments finalized in this action for
the September 28, 2012 reporting
deadline.
2. Summary of Comments and
Responses
This section contains a brief summary
of comments on the proposed changes
to subpart W and responses. Additional
comments and responses thereto can be
found in the document, ‘‘Response to
Comments: 2012 Technical Corrections,
Clarifying and Other Amendments of
the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse
Gases Rule, and Confidentiality
Determinations for Certain Data
Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source
Category’’ (see EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–
0147).
The EPA received several comments
on the 2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal that the EPA has determined to
be out of the scope of this rulemaking.
These comments were diverse in nature,
and covered several provisions within
subpart W. Some of the comments were
more technical in nature, for example,
one comment included a revised
definition of parameter ‘‘Tp’’ of
Equation W–7 to allow for reporters to
use alternative methods such as
engineering estimates based on best
available data to determine the
cumulative amount of time in hours of
venting for specific wells. Other
comments included more substantive
revisions and clarifications to the final
provisions, for example several
comments were submitted on the
monitoring provisions for both
centrifugal and reciprocating
compressors and included revisions to
equation parameters and definitions and
address concerns previously raised by
reporters. Also, by way of a third
example, some of the comments
submitted were requests for clarification
on the final provisions, for example, one
comment included a request for
clarification on the requirement in 40
CFR 98.236 for reporting of ‘‘annual
throughput as determined by
engineering estimate based on best
available data.’’ The EPA has reviewed
these comments, and although these
comments are out of the scope of the
2012 Technical Corrections proposal,
the EPA is considering ways to address
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
these comments including possible
future rulemakings or development of
materials to post on EPA’s subpart W
Web site.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that Equation W–6 be
amended to account for situations
where desiccant dehydrator molecular
sieves are used. The commenter further
stated that this change was necessary
because natural gas processors
commonly use desiccant dehydrator
molecular sieves which typically only
require the dehydrator to be opened to
the atmosphere once every 3 or 4 years
when the molecular sieves are replaced.
The commenter noted that the proposed
Equation W–6 accounts for the number
of dehydrator vessel openings by
dividing 365 days per year by the
number of days ‘‘T’’ between refilling.
The commenter recommended revising
Equation W–6 by removing both the 365
day factor in the numerator and the
variable ‘‘T’’ in the denominator and
adding a new term ‘‘N’’ (number of
dehydrator change-outs per year) to the
numerator.
Response: The EPA has reviewed the
commenter’s suggested change to
Equation W–6 to account for situations
where desiccant dehydrator molecular
sieves are used in desiccant dehydrators
such that the equation will accurately
adjust for the number of times the
dehydrator vessel is opened to the
atmosphere when it may occur less
frequently than once per year. While the
revision that EPA proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal
included a proposed amendment to
Equation W–6 separate from what the
commenter suggested, we agree that
Equation W–6 can be amended as noted
by the commenter to adjust for
dehydrator vessels that are opened once
over a multiple year time period. In
these cases where vessels are opened
less frequently than once per year, using
Equation W–6 as written in the final
subpart W rule would result in an
inaccurate estimate of emissions.
Therefore, we have amended Equation
W–6 of subpart W as recommended by
the commenter. EPA believes that
finalizing this technical correction does
not change the type of information
collected by reporters who would use
this equation, and that it is feasible to
implement this correction for the 2011
reporting year.
Comment: Two commenters
expressed support for EPA’s proposed
technical corrections to Equations W–
23, W–24, W–27, and W–28. However,
two commenters further noted that even
though the 2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal correctly proposed removing
the summation terms in Equations W–
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51483
23, W–24, W–27 and W–28, the
equations for calculating emissions from
centrifugal compressors (Equations W–
23 and W–24) and reciprocating
compressors (Equations W–27 and W–
28) were still incomplete because either
the parameters or the definitions of
those parameters did not fully align
with the proposed technical
amendments. Commenters
recommended either revising the
parameter definition for ‘‘Es,i’’ or
including a definition for the operator
‘‘m’’ in the equation definitions for
Equation W–23 and W–27. Commenters
also recommended including a
definition for the parameter ‘‘MTm,p’’ in
Equation W–24 and W–28.
Response: In the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal, the EPA proposed
to make corrections, though few, to
Equations W–23, W–24, W–27 and W–
28 so that owners and operators would
correctly calculate GHG emissions using
those equations. In this action, the EPA
is finalizing the amendments to both the
centrifugal compressor and
reciprocating compressor emission
sources as proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal. In
response to those comments, the EPA is
finalizing a limited set of additional
corrections for both the centrifugal and
reciprocating compressor emission
sources. Specifically, in Equations W–
23 and W–27, the EPA has finalized a
correction to the definition for
parameter ‘‘Es,i’’ such that the proposed
amendments in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Rule would correctly align
with the proposed amendment to
remove the erroneous summation sign
from these equations. EPA has reviewed
the comments submitted, and in this
action is revising the definition for
parameter ‘‘Es,i’’ in Equations W–23 and
W–27, by adding the subscript ‘‘m’’ so
the parameter now reads ‘‘Es,i,m’’. EPA
has also revised the parameter
definition to clarify that the annual
volumetric GHG emissions are to be
calculated for each centrifugal
compressor (for Equation W–23) and for
each reciprocating compressor
(Equation W–27) for each of the modesource combination in cubic feet.
Similarly, for Equations W–24 and W–
28 the EPA has revised the definition for
parameters ‘‘MTm,p’’ and ‘‘m’’ in
response to comments received on the
2012 Technical Corrections proposed
rule. The definition for parameter
‘‘MTm,p’’ has been clarified to state that
this parameter refers to the flow
measurement from all compressor
sources in each mode-source
combination in standard cubic feet per
hour, and the definition for parameter
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
51484
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘m’’ has been clarified to state that this
parameter refers to each compressor
mode-source combination.
Comment: One commenter agreed
with the proposed change to 40 CFR
98.236(c)(13)(iii)(C) to correct the units
for the centrifugal compressor emission
source to be reported in units of mass
as opposed to units of cubic feet per
hour. This same commenter further
noted that EPA should also apply a
correction to the data reporting
requirements for other provisions in 40
CFR 98.236(c)(13) and (c)(14) such that
data from these two emissions sources,
centrifugal compressors and
reciprocating compressors would be
reported consistently on a mass unit
basis. The commenter also noted that
the references to the equations in 40
CFR 98.233 that are cited in the data
reporting requirements for 40 CFR
98.236(c)(13) and (14) should be
removed.
Response: In the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal, the EPA proposed
a correction to the reporting units for
centrifugal compressors such that the
data would be reported in mass units for
carbon dioxide equivalent instead of
units of cubic feet per minute. EPA
agrees with the commenters and has
corrected the units for the applicable
provisions in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13) and
(14) such that the data will be reported
consistently on a mass basis. The EPA
recognizes that corrections to the units
to the data reporting requirements in 40
CFR 98.236(c)(13) and (14) were not
proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal; however, the EPA
believes that applying the correction
proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal throughout the
data reporting requirements for these
emission sources would be logical, and
would also assist reporters in submitting
the data. Subpart W reporters are
required to submit their data to the EPA
by September 28, 2012 for data collected
in 2011. Because these reports are being
submitted for the first time, the EPA
considers this amendment necessary to
ensure that the units for these data
reporting requirements are consistent.
Further, the EPA believes that this
change is a technical correction that is
logical in nature to apply to similar
provisions for these two emission
sources. Further, EPA believes that this
change would result in less burden on
reporters. Lastly, in line with the
commenters suggestion to remove the 40
CFR 98.233 equation references found
within specific data elements in 40 CFR
98.236(c)(13) and (14), EPA has agreed
with the commenter and in this action
has removed the 40 CFR 98.233
equation references from the following
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
data reporting elements, 40 CFR
98.236(c)(13)(i)(G), 98.236(c)(13)(ii)(C),
98.236(c)(13)(iii)(C), 98.236(c)(14)(i)(C),
98.236(c)(14)(ii)(C), 98.236(c)(14)(iii)(C),
and 98.236(c)(14)(iv).
Comment: One commenter questioned
the proposed amendments to the
population emission factors in Table W–
1A of subpart W. This commenter
specifically questioned why the EPA
increased the emission factors for
valves, flanges, connectors, open-ended
lines, and ‘‘other’’ components as listed
in Table W–1A to Subpart W. The
commenter further noted that the values
previously included in Table W–1A
were close to the commenter’s estimates
when rounded up. Finally, the
commenter recommended EPA not
revise the Table W–1A emission factors
for valves, flanges, connectors, openended lines, and ‘‘other’’ components.
Response: The EPA disagrees with the
commenter that the Table W–1A
population emission factors should not
be revised. In the December 2011
technical corrections final rule (76 FR
80592), the emission factors were
converted from a standard temperature
of 68 °F to a standard temperature of
60 °F. In the December 2011 Final Rule,
the EPA inadvertently used an incorrect
intermediary version of Table W–1A to
convert the emission factors, including
the emission factors for the components
noted by the commenter. The emission
factors proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections for Table W–1A show the
emission factors correctly adjusted to a
standard temperature of 60 °F. In this
action, EPA is finalizing the emission
factors in Table W–1A as proposed in
the 2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal.
Comment: One commenter stated that
Equation W–14A contains an error in
the purge factor that causes the equation
to yield erroneous results. The
commenter further stated that because
the volume being purged is converted
from actual cubic feet to standard cubic
feet, inconsistent units were being
subtracted, (i.e. standard cubic feet
purged and actual cubic feet ‘‘purge
factor’’) in Equation W–14A. The
commenter also stated that the
inconsistency would result in a negative
number if the volume of the purged item
in standard cubic feet was less than that
of actual cubic feet, (i.e. actual
conditions are hotter or a lower pressure
than standard conditions). Finally, the
commenter stated that if the item is not
being purged, the commenter believes
the calculation should not be used, as
there would be no GHG emissions from
the blowdown stack.
Response: The EPA agrees with the
commenter that the natural gas
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
remaining in the unique physical
volume after the blowdown is complete
without purging is at actual conditions.
However, after a blowdown, ‘‘actual
conditions’’ are essentially equivalent to
atmospheric conditions, or standard
conditions (as a simplifying assumption
explained further below).
Equation W–14A calculates the
volume of natural gas emitted from
blowdowns. When equipment is
depressurized, the gas contained in the
unique volume expands as it goes from
actual conditions (process pressure and
temperature) to standard conditions
(i.e., atmospheric pressure and
temperature). Equation W–14A accounts
for this physical change. After
expansion (i.e., venting), some gas will
remain in the equipment or unique
physical volume if the equipment is not
purged. This unvented gas should be
subtracted from the volume of expanded
gas. If the remaining gas in the
equipment is purged, then the purge
factor in Equation W–14A equals zero
and nothing will be subtracted from the
emissions calculated earlier in the
equation as all of the expanded gas
volume has been emitted to the
atmosphere. If the remaining gas is not
purged, then the purge factor equals one
and the unique physical volume will be
subtracted as it was not vented and
released to the atmosphere. There are
several simplifying assumptions in the
equation to facilitate its use. It is
assumed that the process temperature
and/or pressure are significantly
different than standard conditions. It is
also assumed that the equipment is fully
vented to the atmosphere, resulting in
the final condition of the gas being at
atmospheric temperature and pressure.
It is also assumed that the atmospheric
temperature and pressure are not
significantly different than standard
conditions. These simplifying
assumptions are true in a majority, if not
all cases.
D. Subpart L—Fluorinated Gas
Production
1. Summary of Final Amendments and
Confidentiality Determinations
Final amendments. As explained in
Section I.D of this preamble, the EPA is
deferring detailed reporting of GHG
emissions from fluorinated gas
production facilities until 2014 in
today’s final rule. In the meantime, the
EPA is requiring that GHG emissions be
reported in a more aggregated manner
than previously required for the initial
two years of reporting under subpart L.
These changes pertain only to subpart L,
and are temporary (i.e., for reporting in
2012 and 2013) to allow the EPA
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
sufficient time to fully evaluate
concerns raised by stakeholders that
reporting, and subsequent EPA release,
of certain emissions would reveal trade
secrets.
For reporting in 2012 and 2013, we
are requiring owners and operators of
facilities producing fluorinated gases to
report annual total facility-wide
fluorinated GHG emissions from 2011
and 2012 respectively in tons of CO2e.8
The facilities are not required to report
process level emissions or individual
fluorinated GHGs in 2012 and 2013.
These amendments do not change any
other requirements of Part 98 or affect
the deferral of the reporting deadline for
subpart L data elements used as inputs
to emission equations until March 31,
2015 (76 FR 53057, August 25, 2011).
These amendments do not change the
requirement that these subpart L data
elements in today’s final rule be
retained as records in a form that is
suitable for expeditious inspection and
review (required for all Part 98 records
by 40 CFR 98.3(g)).
As proposed, this final rule provides
that owners and operators of facilities
producing fluorinated gases are not
required to submit the data elements
listed below until March 31, 2014:
• 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(iii)
• 40 CFR 98.126 (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4),
(a)(6), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h).
Fluorinated gas producers subject to
subpart L are required to report only the
data elements in 40 CFR 98.126(a)(5)
(the methods used) and in paragraph 40
CFR 98.126(j) (facility-level CO2e
emissions) for reporting of 2011 and
2012 emissions in 2012 and 2013.
Consistent with 40 CFR 98.126(e), a
facility must include any excess
emissions, converted to CO2e, that result
from malfunctions of the destruction
device when reporting total facility
CO2e under 40 CFR 98.126(j). However,
as noted in 40 CFR 98.126(j), these
excess emissions do not need to be
reported separately, but must be
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
8 This includes emissions from all fluorinated gas
production processes, all fluorinated gas
transformation processes that are not part of a
fluorinated gas production process, all fluorinated
gas destruction processes that are not part of a
fluorinated gas production process or a fluorinated
gas transformation process, and venting of residual
fluorinated GHGs from containers returned from the
field.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
included in the facility-wide CO2e
reported. In this action, we have also
amended 98.126(a)(5) as proposed to
require facilities to report the methods
used to determine emissions at a facility
level rather than linking each method to
a particular process.
The EPA requires that facilities use
Equation A–1 of subpart A to calculate
CO2e from the mass of fluorinated GHG
emissions. For fluorinated GHGs that do
not have a global warming potential
(GWP) listed in Table A–1, facilities are
required to use either a default GWP or
their best estimate of the GWP, based on
the information described in 40 CFR
98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3).9 As discussed
further in Section II.D.2 of this
preamble, we have clarified that use of
quantitative structure activity
relationships (QSARs), which are based
on the chemical structure of the
compound, is an acceptable method for
estimating the GWP in situations where
neither pure standards of the compound
nor fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra for the
chemicals mixed with the compound
(i.e., impurities) are available.
As proposed, the default GWP used
depends on the type of fluorinated GHG.
For fully fluorinated GHGs, the default
GWP is 10,000, which is based on the
average GWP of the fully fluorinated
GHGs in Table A–1 of subpart A. For the
purposes of subpart L, the EPA is
finalizing as proposed the addition of
the definition of ‘‘fully fluorinated
GHGs’’ to 40 CFR 98.128: ‘‘Fluorinated
GHGs that contain only single bonds
and in which all available valence
locations are filled by fluorine atoms.
This includes, but is not limited to
saturated perfluorocarbons, SF6, NF3,
SF5CF3, fully fluorinated linear,
branched and cyclic alkanes, fully
fluorinated ethers, fully fluorinated
tertiary amines, fully fluorinated
aminoethers, and perfluoropolyethers.’’
As proposed, for other fluorinated
GHGs, the default GWP is 2,000, which
is based on the average GWP of the
other fluorinated GHGs on Table A–1 of
subpart A.
9 This is part of the provision of subpart L that
allows facilities to request to use provisional GWPs
to calculate whether they must use stack testing to
establish an emission factor for a vent. Note that
EPA is not requiring approval of best-estimate
GWPs in this action.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51485
As proposed, we are adding four new
data elements to the subpart L reporting
requirements. Facilities that use one or
more default or best-estimate GWPs are
required to report the amounts of CO2e
emissions that were calculated using
each of the two default values as well
as using best-estimate GWPs. This
enables the EPA to understand the
potential impact of the default or bestestimate GWPs on the uncertainty of the
overall estimated emissions of the
facility. (Default and best-estimate
GWPs are likely to have higher
uncertainties than GWPs from Table A–
1.) Also as proposed, facilities using
default or best-estimate GWPs for
fluorinated GHGs without GWPs in
Table A–1 of subpart A are required to
keep records of the GWP they used for
each GHG. As proposed, facilities using
best-estimate GWPs are also required to
keep records of the data and analysis
that were used to develop the GWPs, in
a form that is suitable for expeditious
inspection and review (required for all
Part 98 records by 40 CFR 98.3(g)). As
discussed further in Section II.D.2 of
this preamble, we are updating the
proposed recordkeeping requirement to
specify that where QSARs are used to
estimate GWPs, facilities must retain
information related to the reliability of
GWPs based on the QSARs.
Final Confidentiality Determinations.
We are finalizing the confidentiality
determinations for the four new subpart
L data elements (listed in Table 2 of this
preamble) as proposed. In the proposal,
we assigned these four data elements to
the ‘‘Emissions’’ data category because
they describe emissions exhausted to
the atmosphere, and apply to these data
elements the categorical confidentiality
determination the EPA made in the
2011 Final CBI rule for that data
category, i.e., the data elements in this
data category are ‘‘emission data’’ under
CAA section 114(c) and 40 CFR
2.301(a)(2)(i). We received no comments
on our proposed category assignment
and confidentiality determination
described above. We are therefore
finalizing the determination that these
data elements are ‘‘emission data,’’
which are not eligible for confidential
treatment under section 114(c) of the
CAA.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51486
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—REPORTING DATA ELEMENTS AND CONFIDENTIALITY DETERMINATIONS
Data element
Data category (finalized CBI determination 10)
1 ................
98.126(j)(3) ...................................
98.126(j)(3)(ii) ...............................
3 ................
98.126(j)(3)(iii) ..............................
4 ................
98.126(j)(3)(iv) ..............................
You must report the total fluorinated GHG
emissions of the facility, expressed in tons
of CO2e.
Provide the total annual emissions across
fluorinated GHGs for the entire facility, in
metric tons of CO2e, that were calculated
using the default GWP of 2000.
Provide the total annual emissions across
fluorinated GHGs for the entire facility, in
metric tons of CO2e, that were calculated
using the default GWP of 10,000.
Provide the total annual emissions across
fluorinated GHGs for the entire facility, in
metric tons of CO2e, that were calculated
using your best estimate of the GWP.
Emissions (Emission Data: Made available to
the public).
2 ................
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Citation
2. Summary of Comments and
Responses
This section contains a brief summary
of comments on the proposed changes
to subpart L and responses.
Additional comments and responses
thereto can be found in the document,
‘‘Response to Comments: 2012
Technical Corrections, Clarifying and
Other Amendments of the Mandatory
Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule,
and Confidentiality Determinations for
Certain Data Elements of the
Fluorinated Gas Source Category’’ (see
EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0147).
Comment: One commenter
recommended that 40 CFR 98.126(j) be
revised to clarify that comparable
methods for best-estimate GWPs based
on use of professional judgment are
acceptable if they result in accuracy that
is comparable to the accuracy associated
with the methods described in 40 CFR
98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). This commenter
stated that measurement of the lowpressure gas phase infrared absorption
spectrum for a particular fluorinated
GHG is not possible where neither pure
standards of the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated
GHG nor FTIR spectra for the impurities
are available. In such circumstances, the
commenter recommended the EPA
allow reporters to use quantitative
structure activity relationships (QSARs)
that mathematically relate the radiative
forcing and/or atmospheric lifetime (i.e.,
reaction rate) of a compound to the
chemical’s structure (i.e., type of
compound, number of carbon-halogen
bonds, etc.). The commenter believes
that QSARs are a valid approach for
obtaining a ‘‘best estimate’’ of GWP in
situations where infrared spectroscopy
cannot be used and that this approach
is consistent with the methods that are
10 The CBI determinations of these data categories
were finalized in the 2011 Final CBI Rule (May 26,
2011, 76 FR 30782).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Emissions (Emission Data: Made available to
the public).
Emissions (Emission Data: Made available to
the public).
Emissions (Emission Data: Made available to
the public).
described in 40 CFR
98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). The commenter
also stated that comparisons between
measured and QSAR-derived GWPs
have shown that the uncertainty
associated with QSAR-derived estimates
of radiative forcing is between 18 to 23
percent and that the uncertainty
associated with QSAR-derived estimates
of the atmospheric lifetime is 30 percent
on average for a given class of
compounds. The commenter stated that
the overall uncertainty of QSAR-derived
GWPs is a combination of these two
uncertainties, but that use of a QSARbased GWP is still more accurate than
the default GWPs of 2,000 or 10,000
provided in the rule.
Response: The EPA agrees with the
commenter that for purposes of this
rule, use of QSARs is an acceptable
alternative method for estimating GWPs
of fluorinated GHGs that do not have a
GWP listed in Table A–1 of subpart A.
QSARs are based on statistical analysis
correlating the chemical or biological
activity of compounds (including, e.g.,
radiative forcing and reaction rates)
with their molecular structure and/or
properties. The activity of one or more
compounds is estimated (modeled)
based on the activity of compounds
with similar structures. The accuracy of
QSAR-derived estimates depends on the
structural similarity between the
‘‘target’’ compound and the group of
compounds (often called ‘‘analogs’’)
used to model it and on the quantity
and quality of the measurements of the
activity of the analogs, among other
factors. We are finding use of QSARs
acceptable for purposes of this rule
because they can provide reasonable
estimates of the likely radiative
forcing 11 and lifetime of the compound,
which is what the provisions described
at 40 CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3) are
intended to ensure.
As requested by the commenter, we
have revised 40 CFR 98.126(j) to specify
that the use of QSARs for determining
GWPs is an acceptable method for
situations where the infrared spectrum
of a fluorinated GHG cannot be
measured because neither pure
standards of the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated
GHG nor FTIR spectra for the impurities
are available. In addition, we have
revised the proposed recordkeeping
requirements at 40 CFR 98.127 to
require retention of information related
to the reliability of GWPs based on
QSARs. This includes information on
how the structure of the ‘‘target’’
fluorinated GHG is similar to the
structures of the fluorinated GHGs used
to model the radiative forcing and/or
reaction rate of the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated
GHG, the quality and quantity of the
measurements of the radiative forcings
and/or reaction rates of the fluorinated
GHGs used to model these parameters
for the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated GHG, any
estimated uncertainties of the modeled
forcings and/or reaction rates, and
descriptions and results of any efforts to
validate the QSAR model(s).
Although we find the use of QSARs
to be acceptable in this situation, we
disagree with the commenter’s
recommendation that the rule be revised
to state that any comparable methods
based on use of professional judgment
are acceptable if they result in accuracy
that is comparable to the accuracy
associated with the methods described
in 40 CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). Since
the commenter provided no description
of any other alternative methods, we are
unable to assess whether other methods
based on professional judgment would
11 Note that the actual radiative forcing also
depends on other variables, such as whether or not
the gas is sufficiently long-lived to become wellmixed in the atmosphere.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
provide an acceptable level of accuracy.
Thus, we are not including a blanket
provision permitting use of comparable
methods based on professional
judgment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This final rule, which finalizes several
corrections to specific provisions in
subparts A, TT, W, and L to provide
greater clarity and flexibility to facilities
subject to reporting in 2012 and
finalizes confidentiality determinations
for amended subpart L reporting
requirements, is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is therefore not
subject to review under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
These final rule amendments and
confidentiality determinations do not
increase the recordkeeping and
reporting burden associated with Part
98. The amendments to subpart L result
in a net decrease in burden since they
result in less detailed reporting under
subpart L than would otherwise have
been required by the December 2010
subpart L final rule. Although we have
added new recordkeeping provisions to
subpart L, these apply only to those
facilities electing to use the optional
QSAR approach to determining GWPs
instead of the default factors provided
in the rule. Additionally, the subpart L
confidentiality determinations do not
impose any additional burden. The
subpart A amendment is merely a
harmonizing change to a technical
correction finalized in February 2012 for
subpart I that clarifies the existing
reporting requirements. The subpart TT
amendment excludes some facilities
from the reporting requirements and
reduces the burden by making it easier
for facilities to determine applicability
of subpart TT under the GHG Reporting
Rule. Finally, the subpart W
amendments are technical corrections
and clarifications that help clarify GHG
calculations and reporting and do not
materially affect the actions facilities
must take to comply with the rule or
add any additional reporting
requirements. The OMB has previously
approved the information collection
requirements for subparts A on October
30, 2009, subpart L on December 1,
2010, subpart W promulgated on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
November 30, 2010, subpart TT
promulgated on July 12, 2010 under 40
CFR part 98 under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., and has assigned OMB
control numbers 2060–0629; 2060–0650;
and 2060–0647; and 2060–0649
respectively. The OMB control numbers
for the EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are
listed in 40 CFR part 9. Further
information on the EPA’s assessment on
the impact on burden can be found in
the 2012 Technical Corrections and
Amendments Cost Memo in docket
number EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0147.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The RFA generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of this final rule on small entities, a
small entity is defined as: (1) A small
business as defined by the Small
Business Administration’s regulations at
13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of these final rule amendments
on small entities, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These rule
amendments and confidentiality
determinations will not impose any
additional burden on small entities
beyond that currently required by 40
CFR part 98, subpart A promulgated on
October 30, 2009; subpart TT
promulgated on July 12, 2010; subpart
W promulgated on November 30, 2010,
or subpart L promulgated on December
1, 2010. The EPA is promulgating the
amendments in this action to provide
clarity, add flexibility, to address
ambiguity in the rule provisions, and to
make corrections where necessary to
assist reporters in implementation of
these subparts.
Further, the EPA took several steps to
reduce the impact of 40 CFR part 98 on
small entities when developing the final
GHG reporting rules in 2009 and 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51487
Specifically, the EPA determined
appropriate thresholds that reduced the
number of small businesses reporting. In
addition, the EPA conducted several
meetings with industry associations to
discuss regulatory options and the
corresponding burden on industry, such
as recordkeeping and reporting. Finally,
the EPA continues to conduct
significant outreach on the GHG
reporting program and maintains an
‘‘open door’’ policy for stakeholders to
help inform the EPA’s understanding of
key issues for the industries.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This final rule does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more
for state, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or the private sector in
any one year. Thus, the final rule
amendments and confidentiality
determinations for are not subject to the
requirements of section 202 and 205 of
the UMRA. This rule is also not subject
to the requirements of section 203 of
UMRA because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. The
final amendments will not impose any
new requirements that are not currently
required for 40 CFR part 98, and the
final rule amendments will not unfairly
apply to small governments. Therefore,
this action is not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of the
UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
The final rule amendments and
confidential determinations to part 98
do not have federalism implications.
They will not have substantial direct
effects on the states, on the relationship
between the national government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132.
These amendments and confidentiality
determinations apply directly to
facilities that supply certain products
that would result in GHGs when
released, combusted or oxidized and
facilities that directly emit greenhouse
gases. They do not apply to
governmental entities unless the
government entity owns a facility that
directly emits GHGs above threshold
levels, so relatively few government
facilities would be affected. This
regulation also does not limit the power
of states or localities to collect GHG data
and/or regulate GHG emissions. Thus,
Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this action.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51488
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Although section 6 of Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this action, the
EPA did consult with state and local
officials or representatives of state and
local governments in developing
subparts A on October 30, 2009; subpart
TT promulgated on July 12, 2010;
subpart W promulgated on November
30, 2010; and subpart L promulgated on
December 1, 2010. A summary of the
EPA’s consultations with state and local
governments is provided in Section
VIII.E of the preamble to the 2009 final
rule.
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. NTTAA directs the
EPA to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the EPA decides not
to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards. The
final rule amendments do not involve
technical standards. Therefore, the EPA
did not consider the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This final rule, which finalizes
several corrections to specific
provisions in subparts A, TT, W, and L
to provide greater clarity and flexibility
to facilities subject to reporting in 2012
and finalizes confidentiality
determinations for amended subpart L
reporting requirements, will not
increase the burden associated with the
current requirements of 40 CFR part 98.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that the final
rule amendments and confidentiality
determinations will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment because it is a rule
addressing information collection and
reporting procedures.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does
not establish an environmental standard
intended to mitigate health or safety
risks.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs the EPA
to use voluntary consensus standards in
its regulatory activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This final rule is
effective on August 24, 2012, except for
the amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(the subpart A amendments that affect
subpart I) and the confidentiality
determinations for subpart L, which are
effective on September 24, 2012.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 98
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Greenhouse gases, Suppliers, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 3, 2012.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 98—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 98
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A—[Amended]
2. Amend § 98.3 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (c)(4)
introductory text, (c)(4)(i), and
(c)(4)(iii)(E);
■ b. Adding paragraph (c)(4)(iii)(F); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (c)(4)(vi).
■ The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 98.3 What are the general monitoring,
reporting, recordkeeping and verification
requirements of this part?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) For facilities, except as otherwise
provided in paragraph (c)(12) of this
section, report annual emissions of CO2,
CH4, N2O, each fluorinated GHG (as
defined in § 98.6), and each fluorinated
heat transfer fluid (as defined in § 98.98)
as follows.
(i) Annual emissions (excluding
biogenic CO2) aggregated for all GHG
from all applicable source categories,
expressed in metric tons of CO2e
calculated using Equation A–1 of this
subpart. For electronics manufacturing
(as defined in § 98.90), starting in
reporting year 2012 the CO2e calculation
must include each fluorinated heat
transfer fluid (as defined in § 98.98)
whether or not it is also a fluorinated
GHG.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(E) Each fluorinated GHG (as defined
in § 98.6), including those not listed in
Table A–1 of this subpart.
(F) For electronics manufacturing (as
defined in § 98.90), each fluorinated
heat transfer fluid (as defined in § 98.98)
that is not also a fluorinated GHG as
specified under (c)(4)(iii)(E) of this
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51489
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
section. This requirement applies
beginning in reporting year 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) When applying paragraph (c)(4)(i)
of this section to fluorinated GHGs and
fluorinated heat transfer fluids,
calculate and report CO2e for only those
fluorinated GHGs and fluorinated heat
transfer fluids listed in Table A–1 of this
subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend Table A–7 to subpart A of
part 98 by revising the entries for
subpart L to read as follows:
■
TABLE A–7 TO SUBPART A OF PART 98—DATA ELEMENTS THAT ARE INPUTS TO EMISSION EQUATIONS AND FOR WHICH
THE REPORTING DEADLINE IS MARCH 31, 2015
Subpart
Specific data elements for which reporting date is
March 31, 2015
(‘‘All’’ means all data elements in the cited paragraph
are not required to be reported until March 31, 2015)
Rule citation (40 CFR part 98)
*
*
*
*
L ........................................... 98.126(b)(1) .....................................................................
L ...........................................
L ...........................................
98.126(b)(2) .....................................................................
98.126(b)(6) .....................................................................
L ...........................................
98.126(b)(7) .....................................................................
L ...........................................
98.126(b)(8)(i) .................................................................
L ...........................................
98.126(b)(8)(ii) .................................................................
L ...........................................
98.126(b)(8)(iii) ................................................................
L ...........................................
98.126(b)(8)(iv) ................................................................
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
98.126(b)(8)(v) ................................................................
98.126(b)(9)(i) .................................................................
98.126(b)(9)(ii) .................................................................
98.126(b)(9)(iii) ................................................................
98.126(b)(10) ...................................................................
98.126(b)(11) ...................................................................
98.126(b)(12) ...................................................................
98.126(c)(1) .....................................................................
L
L
L
L
L
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
98.126(c)(2) .....................................................................
98.126(d) .........................................................................
98.126(f)(1) ......................................................................
98.126(g)(1) .....................................................................
98.126(h)(2) .....................................................................
*
*
*
Subpart L—[Amended]
4. Amend § 98.126 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text and (a)(5); and
■ b. Adding paragraph (j).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
§ 98.126
Data reporting requirements.
(a) All facilities. In addition to the
information required by § 98.3(c), you
must report the information in
paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(6) of this
section according to the schedule in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, except
as otherwise provided in paragraph (j) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
*
*
*
*
Only data used in calculating the absolute errors and
data used in calculating the relative errors.
All.
Only mass of each fluorine-containing reactant fed into
the process.
Only mass of each fluorine-containing product produced by the process.
Only mass of each fluorine-containing product that is
removed from the process and fed into the destruction device.
Only mass of each fluorine-containing by-product that
is removed from the process and fed into the destruction device.
Only mass of each fluorine-containing reactant that is
removed from the process and fed into the destruction device.
Only mass of each fluorine-containing by-product that
is removed from the process and recaptured.
All.
All.
All.
All.
All.
All.
All.
Only quantity of the process activity used to estimate
emissions.
All.
Only estimate of missing data.
All.
All.
All.
*
this section or in § 98.3(c)(4)(vii) and
Table A–7 of Subpart A of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The methods used to determine
the mass emissions of each fluorinated
GHG, i.e., mass balance, process-ventspecific emission factor, or processvent-specific emission calculation
factor, at the facility. If you use the
process-vent-specific emission factor or
process-vent-specific emission
calculation factor method, report the
methods used to estimate emissions
from equipment leaks.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Special provisions for reporting
years 2011 and 2012 only. For reporting
years 2011 and 2012, the owner or
operator of a facility must comply with
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), and (j)(3) of this
section.
(1) Timing. The owner or operator of
a facility is not required to report the
data elements at § 98.3(c)(4)(iii) and
§ 98.126(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6), (b),
(c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of this section
until the later of March 31, 2014 or the
date set forth for that data element at
§ 98.3(c)(4)(vii) and Table A–7 of
Subpart A of this part.
(2) Excess emissions. Excess
emissions of fluorinated GHGs resulting
from destruction device malfunctions
must be reflected in the reported
facility-wide CO2e emissions but are not
required to be reported separately.
(3) Calculation and reporting of CO2e.
You must report the total fluorinated
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51490
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
GHG emissions covered by this subpart,
expressed in metric tons of CO2e. This
includes emissions from all fluorinated
gas production processes, all fluorinated
gas transformation processes that are not
part of a fluorinated gas production
process, all fluorinated gas destruction
processes that are not part of a
fluorinated gas production process or a
fluorinated gas transformation process,
and venting of residual fluorinated
GHGs from containers returned from the
field. To convert fluorinated GHG
emissions to CO2e for reporting under
this section, use Equation A–1 of § 98.2.
For fluorinated GHGs whose GWPs are
not listed in Table A–1 of Subpart A of
this part, use either the default GWP
specified below or your best estimate of
the GWP based on the information
described in § 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). Use
of quantitative structure activity
relationships (QSARs) is an acceptable
method for determining GWPs in
situations where pure standards of the
‘‘target’’ fluorinated GHG are not
available, the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated GHG
cannot be isolated from gas streams, and
FTIR spectra for the impurities are not
available.
(i) If you choose to use a default GWP
rather than your best estimate of the
GWP for fluorinated GHGs whose GWPs
are not listed in Table A–1 to this
subpart, use a default GWP of 10,000 for
fluorinated GHGs that are fully
fluorinated GHGs and use a default
GWP of 2000 for other fluorinated
GHGs.
(ii) Provide the total annual emissions
across fluorinated GHGs for the entire
facility, in metric tons of CO2e, that
were calculated using the default GWP
of 2000.
(iii) Provide the total annual
emissions across fluorinated GHGs for
the entire facility, in metric tons of
CO2e, that were calculated using the
default GWP of 10,000.
(iv) Provide the total annual
emissions across fluorinated GHGs for
the entire facility, in metric tons of
CO2e, that were calculated using your
best estimate of the GWP.
■ 5. Amend § 98.127 by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text.
■ b. Adding paragraph (k).
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
§ 98.127
Records that must be retained.
In addition to the records required by
§ 98.3(g), you must retain the dated
records specified in paragraphs (a)
through (k) of this section, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) For fluorinated GHGs whose GWPs
are not listed in Table A–1 to subpart A
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
of this part, maintain records of the
GWPs used to calculate facility-wide
CO2e emissions under § 98.127(j).
Where you used your best estimate of
the GWP, maintain records of the data
and analysis used to develop that GWP,
including the data elements at
§ 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(1)through (3). If
you have used QSARs to estimate the
GWP, include information documenting
the level of accuracy of the QSARderived GWP, including information on
how the structure of the ‘‘target’’
fluorinated GHG is similar to the
structures of the fluorinated GHGs used
to model the radiative forcing and/or
reaction rate of the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated
GHG, the quality and quantity of the
measurements of the radiative forcings
and/or reaction rates of the fluorinated
GHGs used to model these parameters
for the ‘‘target’’ fluorinated GHG, any
estimated uncertainties of the modeled
forcings and/or reaction rates, and
descriptions and results of any efforts to
validate the QSAR model(s).
■ 6. Amend § 98.128 by adding the
definition of ‘‘Fully fluorinated GHGs’’
in alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 98.128
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Fully fluorinated GHGs means
fluorinated GHGs that contain only
single bonds and in which all available
valence locations are filled by fluorine
atoms. This includes but is not limited
to saturated perfluorocarbons, SF6, NF3,
SF5CF3, fully fluorinated linear,
branched and cyclic alkanes, fully
fluorinated ethers, fully fluorinated
tertiary amines, fully fluorinated
aminoethers, and perfluoropolyethers.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart W—[Amended]
7. Amend § 98.233 by:
a. In paragraph (e)(5), revising
Equation W–6 and all of its definitions;
■ b. Revising paragraph (f)(1)
introductory text, Equation W–7, and
the definition of parameter ‘‘Tp’’ in
Equation W–7, removing the definition
of parameter ‘‘FRp’’, and adding in its
place the definition of parameter ‘‘FR’’;
■ c. Revising paragraphs (f)(1)(i)
introductory text and (f)(1)(i)(A).
■ d. In paragraph (f)(2), revising
Equation W–8 and the definitions of
parameters ‘‘SPp’’, ‘‘Vp’’, and ‘‘HRp,q’’ in
Equation W–8;
■ e. Revising paragraph (f)(3)
introductory text, Equation W–9, and
the definitions of parameters ‘‘W’’, ‘‘Vp’’,
and ‘‘HRp,q’’ in Equation W–9;
■ f. In paragraph (g), revising Equations
W–10A and W–10B, removing the
definitions of ‘‘FRM’’, ‘‘PRp’’, ‘‘EnFp’’,
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘SGp’’, and ‘‘FVp’’, and adding in their
place respectively the definitions of
‘‘FRMs’’, ‘‘PRs,p’’, ‘‘EnFs,p’’, ‘‘SGs,p’’, and
‘‘FVs,p’’;
■ g. Revising paragraph (g)(1)
introductory text;
■ h. In paragraph (g)(1)(ii), revising
Equations W–11A and W–11B, and the
definitions of parameter ‘‘A’’ in both
Equations W–11A and W–11B, and
removing the definitions of parameter
‘‘FR’’ in both Equations W–11A and W–
11B,, and adding in their place
respectively the definitions of parameter
‘‘FRa’’;
■ i. In paragraph (g)(1)(iii), revising
Equation W–12, and all of its
definitions;
■ j. Revising paragraph (g)(3)(i);
■ k. In paragraph (h), revising the
definition of parameter ‘‘Es,n’’ in
Equation W–13;
■ l. In paragraph (i)(3), revising the
definition of parameter ‘‘ES,N’’ in
Equation W–14A, revising Equation W–
14B, removing the definition of
parameter ‘‘Ta’’ in Equation W–14B, and
adding in its place the definition of
parameter ‘‘Ta,p’’;
■ m. Revising paragraph (j)(5)
introductory text and the definition of
parameters ‘‘Count’’ and ‘‘1,000’’ in
Equation W–15;
■ n. In paragraph (l)(3) introductory text
revising the definition of parameter
‘‘PR’’ in Equation W–17B;
■ o. Removing and reserving paragraph
(n)(7);
■ p. In paragraph (o)(5) introductory
text, revising Equation W–23, removing
the definition of parameter ‘‘Es,i’’, and
adding in its place the definition of
parameter ‘‘Es,i,m’’ .
■ q. In paragraph (o)(6), revising
Equation W–24 and the definition of
parameter ‘‘m’’, and removing the
definition of parameter ‘‘MTm’’, and
adding in its place the definition of
parameter ‘‘MTm,p’’;
■ r. In paragraph (o)(7), revising the
definition of ‘‘EFi’’ in Equation W–25;
■ s. In paragraph (p)(7) introductory
text, revising Equation W–27, removing
the definition of parameter ‘‘Es,i’’ in
Equation W–27, and adding in its place
the definition of parameter ‘‘Es,i,m’’;
■ t. In paragraph (p)(7)(i) introductory
text, revising Equation W–28 and the
definition of parameter ‘‘m’’, and
removing the definition of parameter
‘‘MTm’’, and adding in its place the
definition of parameter ‘‘MTm,p’’;
■ u. Revising paragraph (r)(2)
introductory text;
■ v. Revising paragraph (r)(6)(ii)
introductory text;
■ w. Revising paragraph (t) introductory
text, paragraph (t)(1) introductory text,
and the definition of parameters ‘‘Es,n’’
and ‘‘Ea,n’’ in Equation W–33;
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
51491
x. In paragraph (v), revising the
definition of ‘‘ri’’ in Equation W–36;
■ y. In paragraph (z)(2)(iii), removing
the definition of ‘‘ECO2’’ in Equations
W–39A and W–39B, and adding in its
place the definition of ‘‘Ea,CO2’’;
■
z. In paragraph (z)(2)(vi), revising the
definition of parameter ‘‘HHV’’ in
Equation W–40.
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
§ 98.233
Where:
Es,n = Annual natural gas emissions at
standard conditions in cubic feet.
H = Height of the dehydrator vessel (ft).
D = Inside diameter of the vessel (ft).
P1 = Atmospheric pressure (psia).
P2 = Pressure of the gas (psia).
P = pi (3.14).
%G = Percent of packed vessel volume that
is gas.
N = Number of dehydrator openings in the
calendar year.
100 = Conversion of %G to fraction.
gas wells are vented to the atmosphere
to expel liquids accumulated in the
tubing, a recording flow meter shall be
installed on the vent line used to vent
gas from the well (e.g., on the vent line
off the wellhead separator or
atmospheric storage tank) according to
methods set forth in § 98.234(b).
Calculate emissions from well venting
for liquids unloading using Equation
W–7 of this section.
FR = Average flow rate in cubic feet per hour
for all measured wells venting for the
duration of the liquids unloading, under
actual conditions as determined in
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
*
SPp = For each well, p, shut-in pressure or
surface pressure for wells with tubing
production or casing pressure for each
well with no packers in pounds per
square inch absolute (psia); or casing-totubing pressure ratio of one well with no
packer from the same sub-basin
multiplied by the tubing pressure of each
*
*
*
*
*
W = Total number of wells with plunger lift
assist and well venting for liquids
unloading for each sub-basin.
*
*
*
*
*
well, p, in the sub-basin, in pounds per
square inch absolute (psia).
Vp = Number of unloading events per year
per well, p.
*
*
*
*
*
HRp,q = Hours that each well, p, was left open
to the atmosphere during each unloading
event, q.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Determine the well vent average
flow rate as specified under paragraph
(f)(1)(i) of this section for at least one
well in a unique well tubing diameter
group and pressure group combination
in each sub-basin category.
(A) The average flow rate per hour of
venting is calculated for each unique
tubing diameter group and pressure
group combination in each sub-basin
category by dividing the recorded total
flow by the recorded time (in hours) for
all measured liquid unloading events
with venting to the atmosphere.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(3) Calculation Methodology 3.
Calculate emissions from well venting
to the atmosphere for liquids unloading
with plunger lift assist using Equation
W–9 of this section.
*
Vp = Number of unloading events per year for
each well, p.
*
*
*
*
HRp,q = Hours that each well, p, was left open
to the atmosphere during each unloading
event, q.
*
*
*
(g) * * *
*
*
ER24AU12.004
*
*
Tp = Cumulative amount of time in hours of
venting for each well, p, of the same
tubing diameter group and pressure
group combination in a sub-basin during
the year.
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
ER24AU12.003
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
*
*
Calculating GHG emissions.
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) * * *
ER24AU12.006
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) Calculation Methodology 1. For at
least one well of each unique well
tubing diameter group and pressure
group combination in each sub-basin
category (see § 98.238 for the definitions
of tubing diameter group, pressure
group, and sub-basin category), where
*
ER24AU12.005
■
51492
*
Where:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
*
*
(iii) * * *
*
*
Where:
FRMs = Ratio of flowback rate during well
completions and workovers from
hydraulic fracturing to 30-day
production rate.
FRs,p = Measured flowback rate from
Calculation Methodology 1 described in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section or
calculated flow rate from Calculation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
(1) The average flow rate for flowback
during well completions and workovers
from hydraulic fracturing shall be
determined using measurement(s) for
Calculation Methodology 1 or
calculation(s) for Calculation
Methodology 2 described in this
paragraph (g)(1) of this section. If
Equation W–10A is used, the number of
FRa = Average flow rate in cubic feet per
hour, under actual subsonic flow
conditions.
Where:
FRa = Average flow rate in cubic feet per
hour, under actual sonic flow conditions.
A = Cross sectional open area of the
restriction orifice (m2).
*
parameter includes any natural gas that
is injected into the well for clean-up. If
no gas was recovered, SGs,p is 0.
FVs,p = Flow volume of each well (p) in
standard cubic feet measured using a
recording flow meter (digital or analog)
on the vent line to measure flowback
during the completion or workover
according to methods set forth in
§ 98.234(b).
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Methodology 2 described in paragraph
(g)(1)(ii) of this section in standard cubic
feet per hour for well(s) p for each subbasin and well type (horizontal or
vertical) combination. Measured and
calculated FRa values shall be converted
from actual conditions (FRa) to standard
conditions (FRs,p) for each well p using
Equation W–33 in paragraph (t) of this
section. You may not use flow volume as
used in Equation W–10B converted to a
flow rate for this parameter.
PRs,p = First 30-day production rate in
standard cubic feet per hour for each
well p that was measured in the subbasin and well type combination.
N = Number of measured or calculated well
completions or workovers using
hydraulic fracturing in a sub-basin and
well type combination.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) Use the factor SGs,P in Equation W–
10A of this section, to adjust the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
measurements or calculations shall be
determined per sub-basin and well type
(horizontal or vertical) as follows: at
least one measurement or calculation for
less than or equal to 25 completions or
workovers; at least two measurements or
calculations for 26 to 50 completions or
workovers; at least three measurements
or calculations for 51 to 100
completions or workovers; at least four
measurements or calculations for 101 to
250 completions or workovers; and at
least five measurements or calculations
for greater than 250 completions or
workovers.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
A = Cross sectional open area of the
restriction orifice (m2).
*
*
*
*
*
emissions estimated in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (g)(4) of this section by the
magnitude of emissions captured using
purpose designed equipment that
separates saleable gas from the flowback
as determined by engineering estimate
based on best available data.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Es,n = Annual natural gas emissions in
standard cubic feet from gas well venting
during well completions and workovers
without hydraulic fracturing.
*
*
(i) * *
(3) * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Es,n = Annual natural gas venting emissions
at standard conditions from blowdowns
in cubic feet.
*
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
*
*
24AUR1
*
*
ER24AU12.010
*
ER24AU12.009
*
ER24AU12.008
*
FRMs = Ratio of flowback during well
completions and workovers from
hydraulic fracturing to 30-day
production rate from Equation W–12.
PRs,p = First 30-day average production flow
rate in standard cubic feet per hour of
each well p, as required in paragraph
(g)(1) of this section.
EnFs,p = Volume of CO2 or N2 injected gas in
cubic feet at standard conditions that
was injected into the reservoir during an
energized fracture job for each well p. If
the fracture process did not inject gas
into the reservoir, then EnFs,p is 0. If
injected gas is CO2 then EnFs,p is 0.
SGs,p = Volume of natural gas in cubic feet
at standard conditions that was
recovered into a flow-line for well p as
per paragraph (g)(3) of this section. This
ER24AU12.007
*
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
Ta,p = Temperature at actual conditions in the
unique physical volume (°F) for each
blowdown ‘‘p’’.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(5) Calculation Methodology 5. For
well pad gas-liquid separators and for
wells flowing off a well pad without
passing through a gas-liquid separator
with annual average daily throughput of
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Count = Total number of separators or wells
with annual average daily throughput
less than 10 barrels per day. Count only
separators or wells that feed oil directly
to the storage tank.
1,000 = Conversion from thousand standard
cubic feet to standard cubic feet.
(l) * * *
(3) * * *
*
*
*
PR = Average annual production rate in
actual cubic feet per day for the gas
well(s) being tested.
*
*
*
*
*
*
each centrifugal compressor for modesource combination m, in cubic feet.
*
*
MTm,p = Flow measurements from all
centrifugal compressor sources in each
mode-source combination, m, for each
measured compressor, p, in standard
cubic feet per hour.
*
oil less than 10 barrels per day use
Equation W–15 of this section:
*
*
*
*
*
*
Es,i,m = Annual total volumetric GHG
emissions at standard conditions from
51493
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
*
compressor for CH4 and 5.30 × 105
standard cubic feet per year per
compressor for CO2 at 60 °F and 14.7
psia.
m = Compressor mode-source combination as
listed in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through
(o)(1)(iii).
*
*
*
(o) * * *
(5) * * *
*
*
*
Where:
EFi = Emission factor for GHGi. Use 1.2 × 107
standard cubic feet per year per
*
*
(p) * * *
(7) * * *
*
*
each reciprocating compressor for modesource combination m, in cubic feet.
*
Es,i,m = Annual total volumetric GHG
emissions at standard conditions from
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(r) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
(2) Onshore petroleum and natural gas
production facilities shall use the
appropriate default population emission
factors listed in Table W–1A of this
subpart for equipment leaks from
valves, connectors, open ended lines,
pressure relief valves, pump, flanges,
and other. Major equipment and
components associated with gas wells
are considered gas service components
in reference to Table W–1A of this
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subpart and major natural gas
equipment in reference to Table W–1B
of this subpart. Major equipment and
components associated with crude oil
wells are considered crude service
components in reference to Table W–1A
of this subpart and major crude oil
equipment in reference to Table W–1C
of this subpart. Where facilities conduct
EOR operations the emissions factor
listed in Table W–1A of this subpart
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
ER24AU12.013
*
ER24AU12.012
*
MTm,p = Flow measurements from all
reciprocating compressor sources in each
mode-source combination, m, for each
measured compressor, p, in standard
cubic feet per hour.
m = Compressor mode-source combination as
listed in (p)(1) through (p)(3).
ER24AU12.011
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
*
ER24AU12.014
ER24AU12.015
(i) * * *
51494
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
shall be used to estimate all streams of
gases, including recycle CO2 stream.
The component count can be
determined using either of the
methodologies described in this
paragraph (r)(2). The same methodology
must be used for the entire calendar
year.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(ii) Emissions from all above grade
metering-regulating stations (including
above grade TD transfer stations) shall
be calculated by applying the emission
factor calculated in Equation W–32 and
the total count of meter/regulator runs at
all above grade metering-regulating
stations (inclusive of TD transfer
stations) to Equation W–31. The facility
wide emission factor in Equation W–32
will be calculated by using the total
volumetric GHG emissions at standard
conditions for all equipment leak
sources calculated in Equation W–30B
in paragraph (q)(8) of this section and
the count of meter/regulator runs
located at above grade transmissiondistribution transfer stations that were
monitored over the years that constitute
one complete cycle as per paragraph
(q)(8)(i) of this section. A meter on a
regulator run is considered one meter/
regulator run. Reporters that do not have
above grade T–D transfer stations shall
report a count of above grade meteringregulating stations only and do not have
to comply with § 98.236(c)(16)(xix).
*
*
*
*
*
(t) Volumetric emissions. If equation
parameters in § 98.233 are already at
standard conditions, which results in
volumetric emissions at standard
conditions, then this paragraph does not
apply. Calculate volumetric emissions at
standard conditions as specified in
paragraphs (t)(1) or (2) of this section,
with actual pressure and temperature
determined by engineering estimates
based on best available data unless
otherwise specified.
(1) Calculate natural gas volumetric
emissions at standard conditions using
actual natural gas emission temperature
and pressure, and Equation W–33 of this
section for conversions of Ea,n or
conversions of FRa (whether sub-sonic
or sonic).
*
*
*
*
*
Es,n = Natural gas volumetric emissions at
standard temperature and pressure (STP)
conditions in cubic feet, except Es,n
equals FRs,p for each well p when
calculating either subsonic or sonic
flowrates under 98.233(g).
Ea,n = Natural gas volumetric emissions at
actual conditions in cubic feet, except
Ea,n equals FRa,p for each well p when
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
calculating either subsonic or sonic
flowrates under 98.233(g).
*
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
*
*
*
*
Pi = Density of GHGi. Use 0.0526 kg/ft3 for
CO2 and N2O, and 0.0192 kg/ft3 for CH4
at 60°F and 14.7 psia.
*
*
*
*
*
(z) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Ea,CO2 = Contribution of annual CO2
emissions from portable or stationary
fuel combustion sources in cubic feet,
under actual conditions.
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
HHV = For the higher heating value for field
gas or process vent gas, use 1.235 × 10¥3
mmBtu/scf for HHV.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Section 98.236 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(D).
b. Revising paragraph (c)(9)
introductory text.
■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(13)(i)(G),
(c)(13)(ii)(C), (c)(13)(iii)(C), (c)(13)(iv),
and (c)(13)(v)(B).
■ d. Revising paragraphs (c)(14)(i)(C),
(c)(14)(ii)(C), (c)(14)(iii)(C), (c)(14)(iv),
and (c)(14)(v)(B).
■ e. Revising paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B),
(c)(15)(i)(C), and (c)(15)(ii)(A).
■ f. Revising paragraph (c)(17)(v). The
revisions read as follows:
■
■
■
§ 98.236
Data reporting requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Average internal casing diameter,
in inches, for all wells, where
applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) For transmission tank emissions
identified in § 98.233(k) from scrubber
dump valves report the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(13) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) Report seal oil degassing vent
emissions for compressors measured
and for compressors not measured in
metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(ii) * * *
(C) Report blowdown vent emissions
when in operating mode in metric tons
of CO2e for each gas.
(iii) * * *
(C) Report the isolation valve leakage
emissions in not operating,
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
depressurized mode in metric tons of
CO2e for each gas.
(iv) Report total annual compressor
emissions from all modes of operation
in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(v) * * *
(B) Report annual emissions in metric
tons of CO2e for each gas (refer to
Equation W–25 of § 98.233) collectively.
(14) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Report rod packing emissions for
compressors measured and for
compressors not measured in metric
tons of CO2e for each gas.
(ii) * * *
(C) Report blowdown vent emissions
when in operating and standby
pressurized modes in metric tons of
CO2e for each gas.
(iii) * * *
(C) Report isolation valve leakage
emissions in not operating,
depressurized mode in metric tons of
CO2e for each gas.
(iv) Report total annual compressor
emissions from all modes of operation
in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(v) * * *
(B) Report annual emissions in metric
tons of CO2e for each gas collectively
(refer to Equation W–29 of § 98.233).
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) For onshore natural gas
processing, range of concentrations of
CH4 and CO2 (refer to Equation W–30A
of § 98.233).
(C) Annual CO2 and CH4 emissions in
metric tons CO2e for each gas (refer to
Equation W–30A of § 98.233), by
component type.
(ii) * * *
(A) For source categories
§ 98.230(a)(5), (a)(6), and (a)(7), total
count for each component type in
Tables W–4, W–5, and W–6 of this
subpart for which there is a population
emission factor, listed by major heading
and component type.
*
*
*
*
*
(17) * * *
(v) For each EOR pump, report annual
CO2 emissions, expressed in metric tons
CO2e for each gas.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Revise Table A–1A of Subpart W of
part 98 to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51495
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE A–1A OF SUBPART W—DEFAULT WHOLE GAS EMISSION FACTORS FOR ONSHORE PETROLEUM
AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
Onshore petroleum and
natural gas production
TABLE A–1A OF SUBPART W—DEFAULT WHOLE GAS EMISSION FACTORS FOR ONSHORE PETROLEUM
AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION—
Continued
Emission factor
(scf/hour/
component)
Onshore petroleum and
natural gas production
Eastern U.S.
Valve ...................................
Connector ...........................
Open-ended Line ................
Pressure Relief Valve .........
Low Continuous Bleed
Pneumatic Device Vents 2
High Continuous Bleed
Pneumatic Device Vents 2
Intermittent Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents 2 .......
Pneumatic Pumps 3 ............
0.027
0.003
0.061
0.040
1.39
37.3
13.5
13.3
Valve ...................................
Flange .................................
Connector (other) ...............
Open-ended Line ................
Other 5 .................................
0.05
0.003
0.007
0.05
0.01
0.30
Population Emission Factors—All
Components, Heavy Crude Service 6
Valve ...................................
Flange .................................
Connector (other) ...............
Open-ended Line ................
Other 5 .................................
0.0005
0.0009
0.0003
0.006
0.003
Population Emission Factors—All
Components, Gas Service 1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:09 Aug 23, 2012
0.121
0.017
0.031
0.193
1.39
37.3
13.5
13.3
Jkt 226001
0.05
0.003
0.007
0.05
0.01
0.30
0.0005
0.0009
0.0003
0.006
0.003
1 For multi-phase flow that includes gas, use
the gas service emissions factors.
2 Emission Factor is in units of ‘‘scf/hour/device.’’
3 Emission Factor is in units of ‘‘scf/hour/
pump.’’
4 Hydrocarbon liquids greater than or equal
to 20°API are considered ‘‘light crude.’’
5 ‘‘Others’’ category includes instruments,
loading arms, pressure relief valves, stuffing
boxes, compressor seals, dump lever arms,
and vents.
6 Hydrocarbon liquids less than 20°API are
considered ‘‘heavy crude.’’
*
*
*
*
2 Emission Factor is in units of ‘‘scf/hour/
device.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart TT—[Amended]
11. Amend § 98.460 by adding
paragraph (c)(2)(xiii) to read as follows:
■
§ 98.460
Definition of source category.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(xiii) Other waste material that has a
DOC value of 0.3 weight percent (on a
wet basis) or less. DOC value must be
determined using a 60-day anaerobic
biodegradation test procedure identified
in § 98.464(b)(4)(i)(A).
*
*
*
*
*
12. Section 98.464(b) is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 98.464 Monitoring and QA/QVC
requirements.
10. Amend Table W–5 of Subpart W
of part 98 by revising the entry for
‘‘Vapor Recovery Compressor’’ to read
as follows:
*
Vapor Recovery Compressor 2 ..........................
Western U.S.
Valve ...................................
Connector ...........................
Open-ended Line ................
Pressure Relief Valve .........
Low Continuous Bleed
Pneumatic Device Vents 2
High Continuous Bleed
Pneumatic Device Vents 2
Intermittent Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents 2 .......
Pneumatic Pumps 3 ............
*
Population Emission Factors—All
Components, Heavy Crude Service 6
Population Emission Factors—All
Components, Light Crude Service 4
Valve ...................................
Flange .................................
Connector ...........................
Open-ended Line ................
Pump ..................................
Other 5 .................................
Valve ...................................
Flange .................................
Connector (other) ...............
Open-ended Line ................
Pump ..................................
Other 5 .................................
Emission factor
(scf/hour/
component)
LNG Storage
Emission factor
(scf/hour/
component)
Population Emission Factors—All
Components, Light Crude Service 4
Population Emission Factors—All
Components, Gas Service 1
TABLE W–5 OF SUBPART W—DEFAULT
METHANE EMISSION FACTORS FOR
LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG)
STORAGE—Continued
*
*
*
*
(b) For each waste stream placed in
the landfill during the reporting year for
which you choose to determine volatile
solids concentration for the purposes of
TABLE W–5 OF SUBPART W—DEFAULT § 98.460(c)(2)(xii) or choose to
METHANE EMISSION FACTORS FOR determine a landfill-specific DOCx for
LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) use in Equation TT–1 of this subpart or
for the purposes of § 98.460(c)(2)(xiii) of
STORAGE
this subpart, you must collect and test
Emission factor a representative sample of that waste
LNG Storage
(scf/hour/
stream using the methods specified in
component)
paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–19957 Filed 8–23–12; 8:45 am]
■
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
4.17
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51477-51495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19957]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 98
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147; FRL-9714-3]
RIN 2060-AR53
2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments to
the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and Confidentiality Determinations
for Certain Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source Category
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is amending specific provisions of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule to provide greater clarity and flexibility to facilities
subject to reporting emissions from the industrial waste landfill,
petroleum and natural gas systems, fluorinated gas production, and
electronics manufacturing source categories. These source categories
will report greenhouse gas data for the first time in September 2012.
The changes do not significantly change the overall calculation and
monitoring requirements of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule or add
additional requirements for reporters. The EPA is also making
confidentiality determinations for four new data elements for the
fluorinated gas production source category of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule. Lastly, we are finalizing an amendment to the general
provisions to defer the reporting deadline for a data element used as
an input to an emission equation in the fluorinated gas production
source category until 2015.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 24, 2012, except for the
amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) and the confidentiality determinations
for subpart L described in section II.D of the Supplementary
Information, which are effective on September 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147. All documents in the docket are
listed in
[[Page 51478]]
the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and is publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. This
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carole Cook, Climate Change Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC-6207J), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 343-9263; fax number: (202) 343-2342; email address:
GHGReportingRule@epa.gov. For technical information and implementation
materials, please go to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule Program Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html.
To submit a question, select Rule Help Center, followed by ``Contact
Us.''
Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket,
an electronic copy of this final rule will also be available through
the WWW. Following the Administrator's signature, a copy of this action
will be posted on the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities. The Administrator determined that this action
is subject to the provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 307(d). See
CAA section 307(d)(1)(V) (the provisions of section 307(d) apply to
``such other actions as the Administrator may determine''). These
amended regulations could affect owners or operators of direct emitters
of GHGs. Regulated categories and affected entities may include those
listed in Table 1 of this preamble:
Table 1--Examples of Affected Entities by Category
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of affected
Category NAICS facilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems. 486210 Pipeline transportation
of natural gas.
221210 Natural gas distribution
facilities.
211 Extractors of crude
petroleum and natural
gas.
211112 Natural gas liquid
extraction facilities.
Electronics Manufacturing......... 334111 Microcomputers
manufacturing
facilities.
334413 Semiconductor,
photovoltaic (solid-
state) device
manufacturing
facilities.
334419 LCD unit screens
manufacturing
facilities.
334419 MEMS manufacturing
facilities.
Fluorinated Gas Production........ 325120 Industrial gases
manufacturing
facilities.
Industrial Waste Landfills........ 562212 Solid waste landfills.
322110 Pulp mills.
322121 Paper mills.
322122 Newsprint mills.
322130 Paperboard mills.
311611 Meat processing
facilities.
311411 Frozen fruit, juice, and
vegetable manufacturing
facilities.
311421 Fruit and vegetable
canning facilities.
221320 Sewage treatment
facilities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1 of this preamble is not intended to be exhaustive, but
rather lists the types of facilities that the EPA is now aware could be
potentially affected by the reporting requirements. Other types of
facilities not listed in the table could also be affected. To determine
whether you are affected by this action, you should carefully examine
the applicability criteria found in 40 CFR part 98, subpart A or the
relevant criteria in the sections related to direct emitters of GHGs.
If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular facility, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
What is the effective date? This final rule is effective on August
24, 2012, except for the amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) (the subpart A
amendments that affect subpart I) and the confidentiality
determinations for subpart L, which are effective on September 24,
2012. Section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. Chapter 5, generally provides that rules may not take effect
earlier than 30 days after they are published in the Federal Register.
EPA is issuing this final rule under section 307(d)(1) of the Clean Air
Act, which states: ``The provisions of section 553 through 557 * * * of
Title 5 shall not, except as expressly provided in this section, apply
to actions to which this subsection applies.'' Thus, section 553(d) of
the APA does not apply to this rule. EPA is nevertheless acting
consistently with the purposes underlying APA section 553(d) in making
the final rule provisions, except for the amendments to 40 CFR
98.3(c)(4) (the subpart A amendments that affect subpart I) and the
subpart L confidentiality determinations, effective on August 24, 2012.
This final rule, except for the amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) (the
subpart A amendments that affect subpart I) and the subpart L
confidentiality determinations, temporarily requires less detailed
reporting under subpart L than would otherwise have been required by
the November 2010 Subpart L final rule (75 FR 74774), defers the
deadline for reporting a data element used as an input to emission
equations under subpart L, removes a data reporting requirement and
otherwise provides flexibilities under subpart W, and removes the
requirement for some facilities to report under subpart TT. A shorter
effective date in such circumstances is consistent with the purposes of
APA section 553(d), which provides an exception for any action that
grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction.
Judicial Review. Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, judicial
review of
[[Page 51479]]
this final rule is available only by filing a petition for review in
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (the
Court) by October 23, 2012. Under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B), only an
objection to this final rule that was raised with reasonable
specificity during the period for public comment can be raised during
judicial review. Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA also provides a
mechanism for the EPA to convene a proceeding for reconsideration,
``[i]f the person raising an objection can demonstrate to EPA that it
was impracticable to raise such objection within [the period for public
comment] or if the grounds for such objection arose after the period
for public comment (but within the time specified for judicial review)
and if such objection is of central relevance to the outcome of the
rule.'' Any person seeking to make such a demonstration to us should
submit a Petition for Reconsideration to the Office of the
Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Room 3000, Ariel Rios
Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, with a
copy to the person listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section, and the Associate General Counsel for the Air and
Radiation Law Office, Office of General Counsel (Mail Code 2344A),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20004. Note, under CAA section 307(b)(2), the
requirements established by this final rule may not be challenged
separately in any civil or criminal proceedings brought by the EPA to
enforce these requirements.
Acronyms and Abbreviations. The following acronyms and
abbreviations are used in this document.
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI confidential business information
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CH4 methane
CO2 carbon dioxide
DOC degradable organic carbon
EF emission factor
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FR Federal Register
GHG greenhouse gas
GHGRP Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
kg/ft\3\ kilograms per cubic foot
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
N2O nitrous oxide
NAICS North American Industry Classification System
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
psia pounds per square inch absolute
QSARs quantitative structure activity relationships
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
SF6 sulfur hexafluoride
U.S. United States
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Organization of This Document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background
A. Organization of This Preamble
B. Background on the Final Rule
C. Legal Authority
D. How do these amendments apply to 2012 reports?
E. How do these amendments affect confidentiality
determinations?
II. Final Amendments and Responses to Public Comments
A. Subpart A--General Provisions
B. Subpart TT--Industrial Waste Landfills
C. Subpart W--Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
D. Subpart L--Fluorinated Gas Production
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
A. Organization of This Preamble
This preamble consists of three sections. The first section
provides background on 40 CFR part 98 and describes the purpose and
legal authority for this action.
The second section of this preamble summarizes the revisions made
to the specific requirements for the general provisions (subpart A),
industrial waste landfills (subpart TT), petroleum and natural gas
systems (subpart W) and fluorinated gas production (subpart L) of 40
CFR part 98. It also describes the major changes made to these source
categories since proposal and provides a brief summary of significant
public comments and EPA's responses on issues specific to each source
category. Additional responses to significant comments can be found in
the document ``2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other
Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and Confidentiality
Determinations for Certain Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source
Category--Responses to Public Comment'' in the docket to this
rulemaking.
The third section of this preamble discusses the various statutory
and executive order requirements applicable to this rulemaking.
B. Background on the Final Rule
This action finalizes amendments to provisions in 40 CFR part 98,
subparts A, TT, W, and L. The 2009 final GHG Reporting Rule was
published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009 (74 FR 56260,
hereafter referred to as the ``2009 final rule'' or ``Part 98''). The
2009 final rule, which finalized reporting requirements for 30 source
categories, did not include subparts TT, W, and L. Subsequent notices
were published in 2010 finalizing the requirements for subpart TT (75
FR 39736, July 12, 2010), subpart W (75 FR 74458, November 30, 2010),
and subpart L (75 FR 74774, December 1, 2010). Following the
promulgation of these subparts, the EPA finalized four technical
corrections and clarifying amendments to these and other subparts under
the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 75 FR 66434, October 28, 2010; 75 FR 79092, December 17,
2010; 76 FR 73866, November 29, 2011; 76 FR 80554, December 23,
2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a separate recent action, the EPA proposed corrections,
clarifying, and other amendments to subparts A, TT, W, and L on May 21,
2012 (77 FR 29935), hereinafter ``2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal.'' In that action, the EPA proposed several amendments to
specific provisions in these subparts to provide greater clarity and
flexibility to facilities subject to reporting in 2012. The EPA also
proposed an amendment to Table A-7 of subpart A to add a subpart L data
element that was inadvertently omitted in the final deferral rule \2\
to defer its reporting deadline until 2015. In this action, the EPA is
finalizing amendments to provisions in subparts A, TT, W, and L.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 76 FR 53057, August 25, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 10, 2012 (77 FR 1434), the EPA proposed confidentiality
determinations for data elements (excluding those used as inputs to
emission equations) in eight subparts of Part 98, including subpart L.
In the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal, the EPA proposed, among
other things, four new data elements for subpart L and confidentiality
status for those four new subpart L data elements. In this action, the
EPA is finalizing the addition of four
[[Page 51480]]
new data elements to subpart L and their confidentiality
determinations.
C. Legal Authority
The EPA is promulgating these rule amendments under its existing
CAA authority, specifically authorities provided in CAA section 114. As
stated in the preamble to the 2009 final rule (74 FR 56260, October 30,
2009) and the Response to Comments on the April 10, 2009 initial
proposed rule,\3\ Volume 9, Legal Issues, CAA section 114 provides the
EPA broad authority to require the information proposed to be gathered
by this rule because such data would inform and are relevant to the
EPA's carrying out a wide variety of CAA provisions. As discussed in
the preamble to the initial proposed rule (74 FR 16448, April 10,
2009), CAA section 114(a)(1) authorizes the Administrator to require
emissions sources, persons subject to the CAA, manufacturers of control
or process equipment, or persons who the Administrator believes may
have necessary information to monitor and report emissions and provide
such other information the Administrator requests for the purposes of
carrying out any provision of the CAA. For further information about
the EPA's legal authority, see the preambles to the 2009 proposed and
final rules and EPA's Response to Comments, Volume 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/responses.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the EPA is making confidentiality determinations for
four data elements in subpart L, under its authorities provided in
sections 114, 301, and 307 of the CAA. As mentioned above, CAA section
114 provides the EPA authority to obtain the information in Part 98,
including the four new data elements we have added to subpart L.
Section 114(c) requires that the EPA make information obtained under
section 114 publicly available, except where information qualifies for
confidential treatment. Section 114(c) excludes emission data from
qualifying for confidential treatment. The Administrator has determined
that this action (amendment and confidentiality determination) is
subject to the provisions of section 307(d) of the CAA.
D. How do these amendments apply to 2012 reports?
As explained in the preamble to the 2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal, our response to comments, and this notice, we believe that it
is feasible for reporters to implement the changes for the 2011
reporting year, for which reports are due by September 28, 2012. The
revisions that apply to the reporting for 2011 are primarily technical
corrections, and provide clarification regarding the existing
regulatory requirements or reduce the amount of information that is
required to be reported.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart A, the amendment is merely a
harmonizing change to a technical correction finalized in February 2012
for subpart I (see 77 FR 10373). This change is effective for reporting
year 2012 and does not affect reporting year 2011. The February 2012
subpart I technical correction required reporters to calculate
emissions of certain additional fluorinated heat transfer fluids under
subpart I; however, the February 2012 correction inadvertently omitted
an amendment to a corresponding requirement in subpart A to include
those calculated emissions in the annual GHG report. This action
corrects this omission by requiring that reporters include these
emissions from heat transfer fluids in their facility level totals
reported to the EPA in the annual GHG report. Additionally, as
proposed, this rule adds one data element to Table A-7 to Subpart A
(Table A-7 lists data elements whose reporting deadline is deferred
until 2015). This element was inadvertently omitted in the final
deferral rule defers the reporting of one additional input until 2015.
Because this reduces the reporting requirements, the EPA has determined
that it is feasible for this amendment to apply to the reporting year
2011; therefore this data element would not need to be reported until
2015.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart TT, this final rule excludes
some facilities from the reporting requirements and reduces the burden
by making it easier for facilities to determine applicability of
subpart TT under the GHG Reporting Rule. The excluded facilities are
not expected to emit GHGs since they receive only inert wastes that do
not generate methane.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart W, the amendments include
technical corrections that, while important to allow reporters to
calculate emissions accurately, do not materially affect the actions
facilities must take to comply with the rule. For example, in this
action the EPA has corrected the emission factors in Table W-1A of
subpart W for the onshore petroleum and natural gas production segment,
due to an error in the December 23, 2011 Technical Revisions to the
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Category of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule (76 FR 80554, December 23, 2011, referred to hereinafter
as the ``December 2011 technical corrections final rule''), where EPA
incorrectly revised several of the emission factors in this table. This
final rule corrects this error but does not materially affect the
actions a facility must undertake to comply with subpart W.
In the case of 40 CFR part 98, subpart L, facilities subject to
subpart L will report greenhouse gas emissions in a more aggregated
manner in 2012 and 2013. This amendment is temporary (i.e., for 2012
and 2013 only) to allow the EPA time to fully evaluate concerns
recently raised by stakeholders regarding reporting, and subsequent EPA
release, of certain emission data.
As explained above, we have concluded that it is appropriate to
have these amendments to subpart A, Table A-7 and subparts TT and W
apply to the 2011 reporting year, for which reporting occurs on
September 28, 2012. For additional background information regarding
some of these amendments, please refer to the Technical Support
Document for the 2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other
Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule
proposal, available in the docket for this rulemaking (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-
0147-0041).
E. How do these amendments affect confidentiality determinations?
The amendments in this action do not affect the confidentiality
determinations for subpart A data elements finalized in the
``Confidentiality Determinations for Data Required Under the Mandatory
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Amendments to Special Rules Governing
Certain Information Obtained Under the Clean Air Act,'' \4\
(hereinafter referred to as the ``2011 Final CBI rule'') or the
proposed determinations for subparts W,\5\ L,\6\ and TT.\7\ In this
notice, we are also finalizing confidentiality determinations for the
four new subpart L data elements also added in this rule. The
confidentiality determinations for these new data elements together
with
[[Page 51481]]
our rationale are discussed in Section II.D.1 of this preamble.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 75 FR 30782, May 26, 2011.
\5\ See 77 FR 11039, February 24, 2012.
\6\ See 77 FR 1434, January 10, 2012.
\7\ See 75 FR 30782, May 26, 2011 for final confidentiality
determination for subpart TT. See 77 FR 1434, January 10, 2012 for
proposed confidentiality determinations for new subpart TT data
elements added by the December 2011 technical corrections final rule
subsequent to the final confidentiality determinations made in 75 FR
30782. For the final determinations for the new subpart TT data
elements, see the recently signed action titled Final
Confidentiality Determinations For Nine Subparts and Amendments to
Subparts A and I Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases
Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule does not include confidentiality determinations for
subparts A, W, and TT. For the subpart A amendments, we are not making
any confidentiality determinations because the data element being added
is a subset of another data element in subpart I for which we have
already proposed a CBI determination. Additionally, we are not making
any confidentiality determination at this time for the subpart L data
element added to Table A-7 of subpart A to defer the deadline for
reporting until 2015. For subpart W, in addition to deleting an
existing data element, the amendments in this action make only minor
clarifications to the existing reporting requirements in that subpart,
which do not change the type of data to be reported. Therefore, there
is no change to the proposed confidentiality determinations for the
data elements in that subpart. There are no amendments to the reporting
requirements for subpart TT.
II. Final Amendments and Responses to Public Comments
In this action, the EPA is amending several provisions in subparts
A, TT, W, and L of 40 CFR part 98 to provide greater clarity and
flexibility. The amendments are listed in this section by subpart,
followed by a more detailed summary of the final amendments to the
various provisions and the EPA's responses to major comments submitted
on those amendments. We indicate where an amendment is being finalized
as proposed and where an amendment differs from that which was proposed
in the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal. For additional comments and
EPA's response to those comments please see the comment response
document available in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147.
A. Subpart A--General Provisions
1. Summary of Final Amendments
As proposed, this action amends the general reporting requirements
of 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) of subpart A, which specifies the types of data
and format for reporting emissions in the annual GHG reports (e.g.,
annual emissions from each source category by GHG). In addition to the
proposed amendments to 98.3(c)(4), EPA has included one additional edit
to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) that did not appear in the proposal. This
additional amendment adds the text ``and each fluorinated heat transfer
fluid (as defined in Sec. 98.98)'' to the introductory sentence of 40
CFR 98.3(c)(4). Although this edit was not proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal, it is being added as a clarifying
change to the regulatory language. EPA has determined that this
additional edit does not substantively change the amendments that were
proposed and is administrative in nature. The amendment to subpart A
that was proposed in the 2012 Technical Corrections proposal specifies
that facilities subject to subpart I must include all fluorinated HTFs
listed in Table A-1 of subpart A in the computation of CO2e
that is required by 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(i). Specifically, facilities must
report each fluorinated HTF that is also a fluorinated GHG under 40 CFR
98.3(c)(4)(iii)(E) and each fluorinated HTF that is not a fluorinated
GHG in the new data element, 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(iii)(F). This change,
effective for reporting year 2012, conforms with the amendments to
reporting requirements for heat transfer fluids (fluorinated HTFs) that
were published on February 22, 2012 (77 FR 10373). This change
simplifies reporting for facilities and reduces burden by amending
subpart A to be consistent with the requirements in subpart I. Given
that facilities are already required to calculate emissions of
fluorinated HTFs under subpart I, reporters already have the necessary
data to comply with the final rule amendments.
As proposed in the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal, we are also
amending Table A-7 to subpart A to add a subpart L data element used as
an input to an emission equation (Equation L-6) that was inadvertently
omitted in the final deferral rule. Table A-7 to subpart A lists the
inputs to emission equations whose reporting deadlines have been
deferred until March 31, 2015. Table A-7 to subpart A is amended to
include the data element, ``the mass of each fluorine-containing
product produced by the process'' (40 CFR 98.126(b)(7)); as is already
the case with all other subpart L data elements assigned to the inputs
to equations data category, this change defers the reporting deadline
for this data element until March 31, 2015.
2. Summary of Comments and Responses
We received no comments on the proposed amendments to subpart A.
B. Subpart TT--Industrial Waste Landfills
1. Summary of Final Amendments
As proposed, we are amending subpart TT to exempt industrial waste
landfills that receive only inert materials from reporting under this
subpart. As discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule (77 FR
29935, May 21, 2012), this amendment ensures that landfills that are
not expected to emit GHGs are excluded from reporting under this
subpart. Specifically, we are adding, as proposed, a degradable organic
content (DOC) value exclusion (provided in weight percent on a wet
basis) as 40 CFR 98.460(c)(2)(xiii).
2. Summary of Comments and Responses
We received two comments on the proposed amendment to subpart TT.
Both comments supported EPA's proposed amendments.
This section contains a brief summary of one of the comments
received on the proposed changes to subpart TT and our response.
Additional comments and responses thereto can be found in the document,
``Response to Comments: 2012 Technical Corrections, Clarifying and
Other Amendments of the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule,
and Confidentiality Determinations for Certain Data Elements of the
Fluorinated Gas Source Category'' (see EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147).
Comment: One commenter requested clarification on the number of
test results from the use of the anaerobic biodegradation test that are
required to determine whether or not a facility meets the definition of
the source category under this subpart.
Response: One representative sample must be taken and tested using
an anaerobic biodegradation test in order to determine if a waste
stream is inert and therefore the landfill is exempted from reporting
under 40 CFR 98.460(c)(2)(xiii). This is consistent with the number of
samples required for determining an exemption using the volatile solids
concentration under 40 CFR 98.460(c)(2)(xii). The EPA agrees that a
clarification is needed because Part 98 currently does not specify the
number of samples necessary to determine whether the exemption applies.
Therefore, we have added text to 40 CFR 98.464(b) to provide this
clarification. The EPA notes that while only one representative sample
must be taken from each waste stream to be tested, the anaerobic
biodegradation test must be performed according to the steps described
in 40 CFR 98.464(b)(i), which requires multiple waste samples to be
tested. Therefore, if only one representative sample is taken from a
waste stream, the sample taken must be of sufficient size to be
subdivided and tested according to the requirements in 40 CFR
98.464(b)(i).
[[Page 51482]]
C. Subpart W--Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
1. Summary of Final Amendments
The EPA is finalizing several technical corrections and amendments
to subpart W as proposed in the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal to
correct equations and otherwise clarify provisions in the rule to
ensure consistency across the calculation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements in subpart W and thereby facilitate reporting. The EPA is
finalizing the following technical corrections and amendments as
proposed:
Removing a factor of 1,000 from the denominator of
Equation W-6 in 40 CFR 98.233(e)(5) so that the emissions are
calculated in standard cubic feet rather than thousand standard
cubic feet.
Providing reporters with the option to take and use
more than the prescribed number of sample measurements per unique
well tubing diameter and pressure group combination per sub-basin.
Changing the parameter ``FRp'' to ``FR'' in Equation W-
7 in 40 CFR 98.233(f)(1) to avoid confusion.
Amending the parameter ``Tp'' and its definition in
Equation W-7 to clarify that it refers to the cumulative amount of
time in hours of venting for each well as opposed to the time for
the measured well(s).
Revising the definition of parameter ``SPp'' in
Equation W-8 in 40 CFR 98.233(f)(2) to clarify that the reporter
must take a ratio of casing to tubing pressure.
Updating Equation W-8 and also Equation W-9 in 40 CFR
98.233(f)(2) and (f)(3) by replacing the subscript ``q'' with ``p''
in parameter ``SFR'' to match the definition of parameter ``SFRp.''
Clarifying that the terms ``Vp'' and ``HRp,q'' in
Equations W-8 and W-9 are to be monitored per unloading event.
Clarifying that Calculation Methodology 3 applies to
well venting, not ``each'' well venting and that parameter ``W'' in
Equation W-9 is the total number of wells with plunger lift assist.
Revising the term ``backflow'' to read ``flowback'' in
40 CFR 98.233(g) and (g)(1).
Adding subscript ``s'' to several parameters in
Equations W-10A and W-10B to clarify that these parameters are at
standard conditions.
Clarifying that the flow volume variable ``FVs,p'' in
Equation W-10B is at standard cubic feet.
Clarifying that the outputs of Equations W-11A and W-
11B are at actual conditions by inserting the word ``actual'' in the
definition of flow rate, ``FR,'' and also adding a subscript ``a''
to denote inputs at actual conditions.
Adding a reference to Equation W-12 in 40 CFR
98.233(g)(1)(iii) in the parameter definition ``FRs,p'' to convert
``FRa'' to standard conditions.
In Equations W-11A and W-11B, clarifying the definition
of orifice cross sectional area, ``A'' to state ``Cross sectional
open area of the restriction orifice (m\2\).'' (Adding the terms
``open'' and ``the restriction.'')
Providing reporters with the option to take and use
more than the prescribed number of sample measurements per sub-basin
and well type (horizontal or vertical).
Amending Equation W-13 to clarify that the output is a
sum of emissions from all completions and workovers without
hydraulic fracturing within a sub-basin.
Revising parameter ``Es,n'' in the parameter
description to match the letter case of the term in Equation W-14B,
revising the term ``Ta'' to ``Ta,p'' in Equation W-14B, and
clarifying that the temperature is for each blowdown ``p.''
Revising 40 CFR 98.233(j)(5) to clarify that the term
``throughput'' refers to ``average daily throughput of oil.''
Revising the definition of ``Count'' in Equation W-15
of 40 CFR 98.233(j)(5) to clarify that the reporters are to count
only the separators or wells that feed oil directly to the storage
tank.
Revising the parameter definition of ``1000'' to
accurately describe the conversion occurring through this parameter.
Revising the definition of ``PR'' in Equation W-17B of
40 CFR 98.233(l)(3) to clarify that the production rate is in actual
and not standard conditions.
Removing and reserving 40 CFR 98.233(n)(7) to harmonize
the language with the reporting requirements in 40 CFR 98.236.
Providing the proper notation for the summations in
Equations W-23, W-24, W-27, and W-28 so that owners and operators
may correctly calculate GHG emissions from centrifugal and
reciprocating compressors.
Amending 40 CFR 98.233(o)(7) to remove the word
``thousand'' in parameter ``EFi'' in Equation W-25.
Revising the definition of parameter EFi in Equation W-
25 in 40 CFR 98.233(o)(7) by deleting the term ``thousand.''
Amending an incorrect reference in 40 CFR 98.233(r)(2)
to ``Table W-1A'' instead of ``Table 1-A.''
Revising the phrase ``meter or regulator'' in 40 CFR
98.233(r)(6)(ii) and replacing it with ``meter/regulator.''
Revising 40 CFR 98.233(t) to clarify that reporters do
not need to alter their calculation results to standard conditions
if the results already reflect standard conditions.
Revising the definition of parameter ``[rho]i'' in
Equation W-36 to amend the density value of CH4 to be
0.0192 kg/ft3. Replacing the parameter ``ECO2'' with
``Ea,CO2'' in the parameter definition for Equation W-39A
in 40 CFR 98.233(z)(2)(iii) to match the parameters in the equation.
Revising the definition of ``HHV'' in Equation W-40 in
40 CFR 98.233(z)(2)(vi) to reflect the ``higher'' heating value
represented by the acronym.
Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(5)(ii)(D) to clarify that the
average internal casing diameter of all wells, as opposed to each
well, must be reported.
Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(9) to remove reference to the
optical gas imaging instrument.
Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13)(iii)(C) to replace the
units of ``cubic feet per hour'' with ``metric tons of
CO2e for each gas'' to align the units of this data
reporting element to those of the general provisions of Part 98, 40
CFR 98.3(c)(4)(i), which require reporting of annual emissions in
units of mass in metric tons of CO2e.
Updating the incorrect reference to ``Equation W-30''
in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(15)(i)(B) to read ``Equation W-30A,'' updating
the incorrect reference to ``Equation W-30'' in 40 CFR
98.236(c)(15)(i)(C) to read ``Equation W-30A,'' and deleting the
unnecessary reference to ``parameter GHGi'' in 40 CFR
98.236(c)(15)(i)(C).
Removing the text references to ``(a)(4)'' and ``W-3''
in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(15)(ii)(A) by deleting the unnecessary
references to ``(a)(8).''
Deleting ``and CH4'' from the reporting requirements
for EOR injection pumps in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(17)(v) to make the data
reporting requirements consistent with the calculation procedures in
Equation W-37.
Revising the incorrect title of Table W-1A of subpart W
by deleting ``Table A-1A'' and correcting it to ``Table W-1A.''
Correcting the emission factors in Table W-1A of
subpart W as proposed.
Amending Table W-5 of subpart W to provide the cross-
reference for footnote 2, by adding a reference associated with
footnote 2 to Vapor Recovery Compressor.
In addition to finalizing the amendments proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal, the EPA is finalizing several
additional corrections to address areas where further clarifications to
the subpart W were considered appropriate based on comments received on
the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal:
Removing the factors 365 days and ``T'' from Equation
W-6 of subpart W and adding a new factor ``N'' for the number of
dehydrator openings in the calendar year.
Correcting the definition of parameter ``SPp'' in
Equations W-8 to state that casing pressure is to be measured for
wells with no packer, as opposed to taking the shut-in pressure or
surface pressure measurement for wells with no packers.
Correcting the definition of the term ``PRs,p'' in
Equation W-10A to remove the phrase ``under actual conditions,
converted to standard conditions.''
Correcting the definition of the terms ``SGs,p'' and
``EnFs,p'' in Equation W-10A to include omitted subscripts in the
parameter references.
Correcting the definition of the term ``W'' in Equation
W-12 by replacing the word ``formation'' with ``combination.''
Amending 40 CFR 98.233(o)(5), (o)(6), (o)(7), (p)(7),
and (p)(7)(i) to clarify that the annual emissions must be estimated
for each compressor for each mode-source combination measured in the
reporting year.
Correcting the definitions of the terms ``Es,n'' and
``Ea,n'' in Equation W-33 by deleting the parentheses around the
terms ``FRs,p'' and ``FRa,p'', respectively.
Amending 40 CFR 98.236(c)(6), (c)(13)(i)(G),
(c)(13)(ii)(C), (c)(13)(iii)(C),
[[Page 51483]]
(c)(13)(iv), (c)(13)(v)(B), (c)(14)(i)(C), (c)(14)(ii)(C),
(c)(14)(iii)(C), (c)(14)(iv), and (c)(14)(v)(B) to clarify emission
reporting requirements for compressors.
Since the amendments to subpart W finalized in this action do not
change the type of information that must be collected, the methods used
to collect the data, or materially affect how the emissions are
calculated, we are requiring reporters to implement the amendments
finalized in this action for the September 28, 2012 reporting deadline.
2. Summary of Comments and Responses
This section contains a brief summary of comments on the proposed
changes to subpart W and responses. Additional comments and responses
thereto can be found in the document, ``Response to Comments: 2012
Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments of the Mandatory
Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule, and Confidentiality Determinations
for Certain Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source Category'' (see
EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147).
The EPA received several comments on the 2012 Technical Corrections
Proposal that the EPA has determined to be out of the scope of this
rulemaking. These comments were diverse in nature, and covered several
provisions within subpart W. Some of the comments were more technical
in nature, for example, one comment included a revised definition of
parameter ``Tp'' of Equation W-7 to allow for reporters to use
alternative methods such as engineering estimates based on best
available data to determine the cumulative amount of time in hours of
venting for specific wells. Other comments included more substantive
revisions and clarifications to the final provisions, for example
several comments were submitted on the monitoring provisions for both
centrifugal and reciprocating compressors and included revisions to
equation parameters and definitions and address concerns previously
raised by reporters. Also, by way of a third example, some of the
comments submitted were requests for clarification on the final
provisions, for example, one comment included a request for
clarification on the requirement in 40 CFR 98.236 for reporting of
``annual throughput as determined by engineering estimate based on best
available data.'' The EPA has reviewed these comments, and although
these comments are out of the scope of the 2012 Technical Corrections
proposal, the EPA is considering ways to address these comments
including possible future rulemakings or development of materials to
post on EPA's subpart W Web site.
Comment: One commenter recommended that Equation W-6 be amended to
account for situations where desiccant dehydrator molecular sieves are
used. The commenter further stated that this change was necessary
because natural gas processors commonly use desiccant dehydrator
molecular sieves which typically only require the dehydrator to be
opened to the atmosphere once every 3 or 4 years when the molecular
sieves are replaced. The commenter noted that the proposed Equation W-6
accounts for the number of dehydrator vessel openings by dividing 365
days per year by the number of days ``T'' between refilling. The
commenter recommended revising Equation W-6 by removing both the 365
day factor in the numerator and the variable ``T'' in the denominator
and adding a new term ``N'' (number of dehydrator change-outs per year)
to the numerator.
Response: The EPA has reviewed the commenter's suggested change to
Equation W-6 to account for situations where desiccant dehydrator
molecular sieves are used in desiccant dehydrators such that the
equation will accurately adjust for the number of times the dehydrator
vessel is opened to the atmosphere when it may occur less frequently
than once per year. While the revision that EPA proposed in the 2012
Technical Corrections Proposal included a proposed amendment to
Equation W-6 separate from what the commenter suggested, we agree that
Equation W-6 can be amended as noted by the commenter to adjust for
dehydrator vessels that are opened once over a multiple year time
period. In these cases where vessels are opened less frequently than
once per year, using Equation W-6 as written in the final subpart W
rule would result in an inaccurate estimate of emissions. Therefore, we
have amended Equation W-6 of subpart W as recommended by the commenter.
EPA believes that finalizing this technical correction does not change
the type of information collected by reporters who would use this
equation, and that it is feasible to implement this correction for the
2011 reporting year.
Comment: Two commenters expressed support for EPA's proposed
technical corrections to Equations W-23, W-24, W-27, and W-28. However,
two commenters further noted that even though the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal correctly proposed removing the summation terms in
Equations W-23, W-24, W-27 and W-28, the equations for calculating
emissions from centrifugal compressors (Equations W-23 and W-24) and
reciprocating compressors (Equations W-27 and W-28) were still
incomplete because either the parameters or the definitions of those
parameters did not fully align with the proposed technical amendments.
Commenters recommended either revising the parameter definition for
``Es,i'' or including a definition for the operator ``m'' in
the equation definitions for Equation W-23 and W-27. Commenters also
recommended including a definition for the parameter
``MTm,p'' in Equation W-24 and W-28.
Response: In the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal, the EPA
proposed to make corrections, though few, to Equations W-23, W-24, W-27
and W-28 so that owners and operators would correctly calculate GHG
emissions using those equations. In this action, the EPA is finalizing
the amendments to both the centrifugal compressor and reciprocating
compressor emission sources as proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal. In response to those comments, the EPA is
finalizing a limited set of additional corrections for both the
centrifugal and reciprocating compressor emission sources.
Specifically, in Equations W-23 and W-27, the EPA has finalized a
correction to the definition for parameter ``Es,i'' such
that the proposed amendments in the 2012 Technical Corrections Rule
would correctly align with the proposed amendment to remove the
erroneous summation sign from these equations. EPA has reviewed the
comments submitted, and in this action is revising the definition for
parameter ``Es,i'' in Equations W-23 and W-27, by adding the
subscript ``m'' so the parameter now reads ``Es,i,m''. EPA
has also revised the parameter definition to clarify that the annual
volumetric GHG emissions are to be calculated for each centrifugal
compressor (for Equation W-23) and for each reciprocating compressor
(Equation W-27) for each of the mode-source combination in cubic feet.
Similarly, for Equations W-24 and W-28 the EPA has revised the
definition for parameters ``MTm,p'' and ``m'' in response to
comments received on the 2012 Technical Corrections proposed rule. The
definition for parameter ``MTm,p'' has been clarified to
state that this parameter refers to the flow measurement from all
compressor sources in each mode-source combination in standard cubic
feet per hour, and the definition for parameter
[[Page 51484]]
``m'' has been clarified to state that this parameter refers to each
compressor mode-source combination.
Comment: One commenter agreed with the proposed change to 40 CFR
98.236(c)(13)(iii)(C) to correct the units for the centrifugal
compressor emission source to be reported in units of mass as opposed
to units of cubic feet per hour. This same commenter further noted that
EPA should also apply a correction to the data reporting requirements
for other provisions in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13) and (c)(14) such that data
from these two emissions sources, centrifugal compressors and
reciprocating compressors would be reported consistently on a mass unit
basis. The commenter also noted that the references to the equations in
40 CFR 98.233 that are cited in the data reporting requirements for 40
CFR 98.236(c)(13) and (14) should be removed.
Response: In the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal, the EPA
proposed a correction to the reporting units for centrifugal
compressors such that the data would be reported in mass units for
carbon dioxide equivalent instead of units of cubic feet per minute.
EPA agrees with the commenters and has corrected the units for the
applicable provisions in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13) and (14) such that the
data will be reported consistently on a mass basis. The EPA recognizes
that corrections to the units to the data reporting requirements in 40
CFR 98.236(c)(13) and (14) were not proposed in the 2012 Technical
Corrections Proposal; however, the EPA believes that applying the
correction proposed in the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal
throughout the data reporting requirements for these emission sources
would be logical, and would also assist reporters in submitting the
data. Subpart W reporters are required to submit their data to the EPA
by September 28, 2012 for data collected in 2011. Because these reports
are being submitted for the first time, the EPA considers this
amendment necessary to ensure that the units for these data reporting
requirements are consistent. Further, the EPA believes that this change
is a technical correction that is logical in nature to apply to similar
provisions for these two emission sources. Further, EPA believes that
this change would result in less burden on reporters. Lastly, in line
with the commenters suggestion to remove the 40 CFR 98.233 equation
references found within specific data elements in 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13)
and (14), EPA has agreed with the commenter and in this action has
removed the 40 CFR 98.233 equation references from the following data
reporting elements, 40 CFR 98.236(c)(13)(i)(G), 98.236(c)(13)(ii)(C),
98.236(c)(13)(iii)(C), 98.236(c)(14)(i)(C), 98.236(c)(14)(ii)(C),
98.236(c)(14)(iii)(C), and 98.236(c)(14)(iv).
Comment: One commenter questioned the proposed amendments to the
population emission factors in Table W-1A of subpart W. This commenter
specifically questioned why the EPA increased the emission factors for
valves, flanges, connectors, open-ended lines, and ``other'' components
as listed in Table W-1A to Subpart W. The commenter further noted that
the values previously included in Table W-1A were close to the
commenter's estimates when rounded up. Finally, the commenter
recommended EPA not revise the Table W-1A emission factors for valves,
flanges, connectors, open-ended lines, and ``other'' components.
Response: The EPA disagrees with the commenter that the Table W-1A
population emission factors should not be revised. In the December 2011
technical corrections final rule (76 FR 80592), the emission factors
were converted from a standard temperature of 68[emsp14][deg]F to a
standard temperature of 60[emsp14][deg]F. In the December 2011 Final
Rule, the EPA inadvertently used an incorrect intermediary version of
Table W-1A to convert the emission factors, including the emission
factors for the components noted by the commenter. The emission factors
proposed in the 2012 Technical Corrections for Table W-1A show the
emission factors correctly adjusted to a standard temperature of 60
[deg]F. In this action, EPA is finalizing the emission factors in Table
W-1A as proposed in the 2012 Technical Corrections Proposal.
Comment: One commenter stated that Equation W-14A contains an error
in the purge factor that causes the equation to yield erroneous
results. The commenter further stated that because the volume being
purged is converted from actual cubic feet to standard cubic feet,
inconsistent units were being subtracted, (i.e. standard cubic feet
purged and actual cubic feet ``purge factor'') in Equation W-14A. The
commenter also stated that the inconsistency would result in a negative
number if the volume of the purged item in standard cubic feet was less
than that of actual cubic feet, (i.e. actual conditions are hotter or a
lower pressure than standard conditions). Finally, the commenter stated
that if the item is not being purged, the commenter believes the
calculation should not be used, as there would be no GHG emissions from
the blowdown stack.
Response: The EPA agrees with the commenter that the natural gas
remaining in the unique physical volume after the blowdown is complete
without purging is at actual conditions. However, after a blowdown,
``actual conditions'' are essentially equivalent to atmospheric
conditions, or standard conditions (as a simplifying assumption
explained further below).
Equation W-14A calculates the volume of natural gas emitted from
blowdowns. When equipment is depressurized, the gas contained in the
unique volume expands as it goes from actual conditions (process
pressure and temperature) to standard conditions (i.e., atmospheric
pressure and temperature). Equation W-14A accounts for this physical
change. After expansion (i.e., venting), some gas will remain in the
equipment or unique physical volume if the equipment is not purged.
This unvented gas should be subtracted from the volume of expanded gas.
If the remaining gas in the equipment is purged, then the purge factor
in Equation W-14A equals zero and nothing will be subtracted from the
emissions calculated earlier in the equation as all of the expanded gas
volume has been emitted to the atmosphere. If the remaining gas is not
purged, then the purge factor equals one and the unique physical volume
will be subtracted as it was not vented and released to the atmosphere.
There are several simplifying assumptions in the equation to facilitate
its use. It is assumed that the process temperature and/or pressure are
significantly different than standard conditions. It is also assumed
that the equipment is fully vented to the atmosphere, resulting in the
final condition of the gas being at atmospheric temperature and
pressure. It is also assumed that the atmospheric temperature and
pressure are not significantly different than standard conditions.
These simplifying assumptions are true in a majority, if not all cases.
D. Subpart L--Fluorinated Gas Production
1. Summary of Final Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations
Final amendments. As explained in Section I.D of this preamble, the
EPA is deferring detailed reporting of GHG emissions from fluorinated
gas production facilities until 2014 in today's final rule. In the
meantime, the EPA is requiring that GHG emissions be reported in a more
aggregated manner than previously required for the initial two years of
reporting under subpart L. These changes pertain only to subpart L, and
are temporary (i.e., for reporting in 2012 and 2013) to allow the EPA
[[Page 51485]]
sufficient time to fully evaluate concerns raised by stakeholders that
reporting, and subsequent EPA release, of certain emissions would
reveal trade secrets.
For reporting in 2012 and 2013, we are requiring owners and
operators of facilities producing fluorinated gases to report annual
total facility-wide fluorinated GHG emissions from 2011 and 2012
respectively in tons of CO2e.\8\ The facilities are not
required to report process level emissions or individual fluorinated
GHGs in 2012 and 2013. These amendments do not change any other
requirements of Part 98 or affect the deferral of the reporting
deadline for subpart L data elements used as inputs to emission
equations until March 31, 2015 (76 FR 53057, August 25, 2011). These
amendments do not change the requirement that these subpart L data
elements in today's final rule be retained as records in a form that is
suitable for expeditious inspection and review (required for all Part
98 records by 40 CFR 98.3(g)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This includes emissions from all fluorinated gas production
processes, all fluorinated gas transformation processes that are not
part of a fluorinated gas production process, all fluorinated gas
destruction processes that are not part of a fluorinated gas
production process or a fluorinated gas transformation process, and
venting of residual fluorinated GHGs from containers returned from
the field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, this final rule provides that owners and operators of
facilities producing fluorinated gases are not required to submit the
data elements listed below until March 31, 2014:
40 CFR 98.3(c)(4)(iii)
40 CFR 98.126 (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6), (b), (c),
(d), (e), (f), (g), and (h).
Fluorinated gas producers subject to subpart L are required to
report only the data elements in 40 CFR 98.126(a)(5) (the methods used)
and in paragraph 40 CFR 98.126(j) (facility-level CO2e
emissions) for reporting of 2011 and 2012 emissions in 2012 and 2013.
Consistent with 40 CFR 98.126(e), a facility must include any excess
emissions, converted to CO2e, that result from malfunctions
of the destruction device when reporting total facility CO2e
under 40 CFR 98.126(j). However, as noted in 40 CFR 98.126(j), these
excess emissions do not need to be reported separately, but must be
included in the facility-wide CO2e reported. In this action,
we have also amended 98.126(a)(5) as proposed to require facilities to
report the methods used to determine emissions at a facility level
rather than linking each method to a particular process.
The EPA requires that facilities use Equation A-1 of subpart A to
calculate CO2e from the mass of fluorinated GHG emissions.
For fluorinated GHGs that do not have a global warming potential (GWP)
listed in Table A-1, facilities are required to use either a default
GWP or their best estimate of the GWP, based on the information
described in 40 CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3).\9\ As discussed further in
Section II.D.2 of this preamble, we have clarified that use of
quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs), which are based
on the chemical structure of the compound, is an acceptable method for
estimating the GWP in situations where neither pure standards of the
compound nor fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra for
the chemicals mixed with the compound (i.e., impurities) are available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ This is part of the provision of subpart L that allows
facilities to request to use provisional GWPs to calculate whether
they must use stack testing to establish an emission factor for a
vent. Note that EPA is not requiring approval of best-estimate GWPs
in this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, the default GWP used depends on the type of
fluorinated GHG. For fully fluorinated GHGs, the default GWP is 10,000,
which is based on the average GWP of the fully fluorinated GHGs in
Table A-1 of subpart A. For the purposes of subpart L, the EPA is
finalizing as proposed the addition of the definition of ``fully
fluorinated GHGs'' to 40 CFR 98.128: ``Fluorinated GHGs that contain
only single bonds and in which all available valence locations are
filled by fluorine atoms. This includes, but is not limited to
saturated perfluorocarbons, SF6, NF3,
SF5CF3, fully fluorinated linear, branched and
cyclic alkanes, fully fluorinated ethers, fully fluorinated tertiary
amines, fully fluorinated aminoethers, and perfluoropolyethers.'' As
proposed, for other fluorinated GHGs, the default GWP is 2,000, which
is based on the average GWP of the other fluorinated GHGs on Table A-1
of subpart A.
As proposed, we are adding four new data elements to the subpart L
reporting requirements. Facilities that use one or more default or
best-estimate GWPs are required to report the amounts of
CO2e emissions that were calculated using each of the two
default values as well as using best-estimate GWPs. This enables the
EPA to understand the potential impact of the default or best-estimate
GWPs on the uncertainty of the overall estimated emissions of the
facility. (Default and best-estimate GWPs are likely to have higher
uncertainties than GWPs from Table A-1.) Also as proposed, facilities
using default or best-estimate GWPs for fluorinated GHGs without GWPs
in Table A-1 of subpart A are required to keep records of the GWP they
used for each GHG. As proposed, facilities using best-estimate GWPs are
also required to keep records of the data and analysis that were used
to develop the GWPs, in a form that is suitable for expeditious
inspection and review (required for all Part 98 records by 40 CFR
98.3(g)). As discussed further in Section II.D.2 of this preamble, we
are updating the proposed recordkeeping requirement to specify that
where QSARs are used to estimate GWPs, facilities must retain
information related to the reliability of GWPs based on the QSARs.
Final Confidentiality Determinations. We are finalizing the
confidentiality determinations for the four new subpart L data elements
(listed in Table 2 of this preamble) as proposed. In the proposal, we
assigned these four data elements to the ``Emissions'' data category
because they describe emissions exhausted to the atmosphere, and apply
to these data elements the categorical confidentiality determination
the EPA made in the 2011 Final CBI rule for that data category, i.e.,
the data elements in this data category are ``emission data'' under CAA
section 114(c) and 40 CFR 2.301(a)(2)(i). We received no comments on
our proposed category assignment and confidentiality determination
described above. We are therefore finalizing the determination that
these data elements are ``emission data,'' which are not eligible for
confidential treatment under section 114(c) of the CAA.-
[[Page 51486]]
Table 2--Reporting Data Elements and Confidentiality Determinations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data category (finalized
Citation Data element CBI determination \10\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. 98.126(j)(3)......... You must report the total Emissions (Emission Data:
fluorinated GHG emissions Made available to the
of the facility, public).
expressed in tons of CO2e.
2................................. 98.126(j)(3)(ii)..... Provide the total annual Emissions (Emission Data:
emissions across Made available to the
fluorinated GHGs for the public).
entire facility, in
metric tons of CO2e, that
were calculated using the
default GWP of 2000.
3................................. 98.126(j)(3)(iii).... Provide the total annual Emissions (Emission Data:
emissions across Made available to the
fluorinated GHGs for the public).
entire facility, in
metric tons of CO2e, that
were calculated using the
default GWP of 10,000.
4................................. 98.126(j)(3)(iv)..... Provide the total annual Emissions (Emission Data:
emissions across Made available to the
fluorinated GHGs for the public).
entire facility, in
metric tons of CO2e, that
were calculated using
your best estimate of the
GWP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Summary of Comments and Responses
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The CBI determinations of these data categories were
finalized in the 2011 Final CBI Rule (May 26, 2011, 76 FR 30782).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This section contains a brief summary of comments on the proposed
changes to subpart L and responses.
Additional comments and responses thereto can be found in the
document, ``Response to Comments: 2012 Technical Corrections,
Clarifying and Other Amendments of the Mandatory Reporting of
Greenhouse Gases Rule, and Confidentiality Determinations for Certain
Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source Category'' (see EPA-HQ-OAR-
2011-0147).
Comment: One commenter recommended that 40 CFR 98.126(j) be revised
to clarify that comparable methods for best-estimate GWPs based on use
of professional judgment are acceptable if they result in accuracy that
is comparable to the accuracy associated with the methods described in
40 CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). This commenter stated that measurement
of the low-pressure gas phase infrared absorption spectrum for a
particular fluorinated GHG is not possible where neither pure standards
of the ``target'' fluorinated GHG nor FTIR spectra for the impurities
are available. In such circumstances, the commenter recommended the EPA
allow reporters to use quantitative structure activity relationships
(QSARs) that mathematically relate the radiative forcing and/or
atmospheric lifetime (i.e., reaction rate) of a compound to the
chemical's structure (i.e., type of compound, number of carbon-halogen
bonds, etc.). The commenter believes that QSARs are a valid approach
for obtaining a ``best estimate'' of GWP in situations where infrared
spectroscopy cannot be used and that this approach is consistent with
the methods that are described in 40 CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). The
commenter also stated that comparisons between measured and QSAR-
derived GWPs have shown that the uncertainty associated with QSAR-
derived estimates of radiative forcing is between 18 to 23 percent and
that the uncertainty associated with QSAR-derived estimates of the
atmospheric lifetime is 30 percent on average for a given class of
compounds. The commenter stated that the overall uncertainty of QSAR-
derived GWPs is a combination of these two uncertainties, but that use
of a QSAR-based GWP is still more accurate than the default GWPs of
2,000 or 10,000 provided in the rule.
Response: The EPA agrees with the commenter that for purposes of
this rule, use of QSARs is an acceptable alternative method for
estimating GWPs of fluorinated GHGs that do not have a GWP listed in
Table A-1 of subpart A. QSARs are based on statistical analysis
correlating the chemical or biological activity of compounds
(including, e.g., radiative forcing and reaction rates) with their
molecular structure and/or properties. The activity of one or more
compounds is estimated (modeled) based on the activity of compounds
with similar structures. The accuracy of QSAR-derived estimates depends
on the structural similarity between the ``target'' compound and the
group of compounds (often called ``analogs'') used to model it and on
the quantity and quality of the measurements of the activity of the
analogs, among other factors. We are finding use of QSARs acceptable
for purposes of this rule because they can provide reasonable estimates
of the likely radiative forcing \11\ and lifetime of the compound,
which is what the provisions described at 40 CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3)
are intended to ensure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Note that the actual radiative forcing also depends on
other variables, such as whether or not the gas is sufficiently
long-lived to become well-mixed in the atmosphere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As requested by the commenter, we have revised 40 CFR 98.126(j) to
specify that the use of QSARs for determining GWPs is an acceptable
method for situations where the infrared spectrum of a fluorinated GHG
cannot be measured because neither pure standards of the ``target''
fluorinated GHG nor FTIR spectra for the impurities are available. In
addition, we have revised the proposed recordkeeping requirements at 40
CFR 98.127 to require retention of information related to the
reliability of GWPs based on QSARs. This includes information on how
the structure of the ``target'' fluorinated GHG is similar to the
structures of the fluorinated GHGs used to model the radiative forcing
and/or reaction rate of the ``target'' fluorinated GHG, the quality and
quantity of the measurements of the radiative forcings and/or reaction
rates of the fluorinated GHGs used to model these parameters for the
``target'' fluorinated GHG, any estimated uncertainties of the modeled
forcings and/or reaction rates, and descriptions and results of any
efforts to validate the QSAR model(s).
Although we find the use of QSARs to be acceptable in this
situation, we disagree with the commenter's recommendation that the
rule be revised to state that any comparable methods based on use of
professional judgment are acceptable if they result in accuracy that is
comparable to the accuracy associated with the methods described in 40
CFR 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). Since the commenter provided no description
of any other alternative methods, we are unable to assess whether other
methods based on professional judgment would
[[Page 51487]]
provide an acceptable level of accuracy. Thus, we are not including a
blanket provision permitting use of comparable methods based on
professional judgment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This final rule, which finalizes several corrections to specific
provisions in subparts A, TT, W, and L to provide greater clarity and
flexibility to facilities subject to reporting in 2012 and finalizes
confidentiality determinations for amended subpart L reporting
requirements, is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
These final rule amendments and confidentiality determinations do
not increase the recordkeeping and reporting burden associated with
Part 98. The amendments to subpart L result in a net decrease in burden
since they result in less detailed reporting under subpart L than would
otherwise have been required by the December 2010 subpart L final rule.
Although we have added new recordkeeping provisions to subpart L, these
apply only to those facilities electing to use the optional QSAR
approach to determining GWPs instead of the default factors provided in
the rule. Additionally, the subpart L confidentiality determinations do
not impose any additional burden. The subpart A amendment is merely a
harmonizing change to a technical correction finalized in February 2012
for subpart I that clarifies the existing reporting requirements. The
subpart TT amendment excludes some facilities from the reporting
requirements and reduces the burden by making it easier for facilities
to determine applicability of subpart TT under the GHG Reporting Rule.
Finally, the subpart W amendments are technical corrections and
clarifications that help clarify GHG calculations and reporting and do
not materially affect the actions facilities must take to comply with
the rule or add any additional reporting requirements. The OMB has
previously approved the information collection requirements for
subparts A on October 30, 2009, subpart L on December 1, 2010, subpart
W promulgated on November 30, 2010, subpart TT promulgated on July 12,
2010 under 40 CFR part 98 under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and has assigned OMB control
numbers 2060-0629; 2060-0650; and 2060-0647; and 2060-0649
respectively. The OMB control numbers for the EPA's regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. Further information on the EPA's
assessment on the impact on burden can be found in the 2012 Technical
Corrections and Amendments Cost Memo in docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-
0147.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of this final rule on small
entities, a small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined
by the Small Business Administration's regulations at 13 CFR 121.201;
(2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city,
county, town, school district or special district with a population of
less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-
profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of these final rule
amendments on small entities, I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These rule amendments and confidentiality determinations will
not impose any additional burden on small entities beyond that
currently required by 40 CFR part 98, subpart A promulgated on October
30, 2009; subpart TT promulgated on July 12, 2010; subpart W
promulgated on November 30, 2010, or subpart L promulgated on December
1, 2010. The EPA is promulgating the amendments in this action to
provide clarity, add flexibility, to address ambiguity in the rule
provisions, and to make corrections where necessary to assist reporters
in implementation of these subparts.
Further, the EPA took several steps to reduce the impact of 40 CFR
part 98 on small entities when developing the final GHG reporting rules
in 2009 and 2010. Specifically, the EPA determined appropriate
thresholds that reduced the number of small businesses reporting. In
addition, the EPA conducted several meetings with industry associations
to discuss regulatory options and the corresponding burden on industry,
such as recordkeeping and reporting. Finally, the EPA continues to
conduct significant outreach on the GHG reporting program and maintains
an ``open door'' policy for stakeholders to help inform the EPA's
understanding of key issues for the industries.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This final rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result
in expenditures of $100 million or more for state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year.
Thus, the final rule amendments and confidentiality determinations for
are not subject to the requirements of section 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
This rule is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of
UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The final
amendments will not impose any new requirements that are not currently
required for 40 CFR part 98, and the final rule amendments will not
unfairly apply to small governments. Therefore, this action is not
subject to the requirements of section 203 of the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
The final rule amendments and confidential determinations to part
98 do not have federalism implications. They will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132. These amendments and confidentiality
determinations apply directly to facilities that supply certain
products that would result in GHGs when released, combusted or oxidized
and facilities that directly emit greenhouse gases. They do not apply
to governmental entities unless the government entity owns a facility
that directly emits GHGs above threshold levels, so relatively few
government facilities would be affected. This regulation also does not
limit the power of states or localities to collect GHG data and/or
regulate GHG emissions. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to
this action.
[[Page 51488]]
Although section 6 of Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this
action, the EPA did consult with state and local officials or
representatives of state and local governments in developing subparts A
on October 30, 2009; subpart TT promulgated on July 12, 2010; subpart W
promulgated on November 30, 2010; and subpart L promulgated on December
1, 2010. A summary of the EPA's consultations with state and local
governments is provided in Section VIII.E of the preamble to the 2009
final rule.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This final rule,
which finalizes several corrections to specific provisions in subparts
A, TT, W, and L to provide greater clarity and flexibility to
facilities subject to reporting in 2012 and finalizes confidentiality
determinations for amended subpart L reporting requirements, will not
increase the burden associated with the current requirements of 40 CFR
part 98. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health
or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not
establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or
safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs the EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations when the EPA decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. The final rule
amendments do not involve technical standards. Therefore, the EPA did
not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that the final rule amendments and
confidentiality determinations will not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-
income populations because it does not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the environment because it is a rule
addressing information collection and reporting procedures.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing
this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This final rule is effective on August 24, 2012, except for the
amendments to 40 CFR 98.3(c)(4) (the subpart A amendments that affect
subpart I) and the confidentiality determinations for subpart L, which
are effective on September 24, 2012.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 98
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Greenhouse gases, Suppliers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 3, 2012.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 98--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 98 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 98.3 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (c)(4) introductory text, (c)(4)(i), and
(c)(4)(iii)(E);
0
b. Adding paragraph (c)(4)(iii)(F); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(4)(vi).
0
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 98.3 What are the general monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping
and verification requirements of this part?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) For facilities, except as otherwise provided in paragraph
(c)(12) of this section, report annual emissions of CO2,
CH4, N2O, each fluorinated GHG (as defined in
Sec. 98.6), and each fluorinated heat transfer fluid (as defined in
Sec. 98.98) as follows.
(i) Annual emissions (excluding biogenic CO2) aggregated
for all GHG from all applicable source categories, expressed in metric
tons of CO2e calculated using Equation A-1 of this subpart.
For electronics manufacturing (as defined in Sec. 98.90), starting in
reporting year 2012 the CO2e calculation must include each
fluorinated heat transfer fluid (as defined in Sec. 98.98) whether or
not it is also a fluorinated GHG.
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(E) Each fluorinated GHG (as defined in Sec. 98.6), including
those not listed in Table A-1 of this subpart.
(F) For electronics manufacturing (as defined in Sec. 98.90), each
fluorinated heat transfer fluid (as defined in Sec. 98.98) that is not
also a fluorinated GHG as specified under (c)(4)(iii)(E) of this
[[Page 51489]]
section. This requirement applies beginning in reporting year 2012.
* * * * *
(vi) When applying paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section to
fluorinated GHGs and fluorinated heat transfer fluids, calculate and
report CO2e for only those fluorinated GHGs and fluorinated
heat transfer fluids listed in Table A-1 of this subpart.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Table A-7 to subpart A of part 98 by revising the entries for
subpart L to read as follows:
Table A-7 to Subpart A of Part 98--Data Elements That Are Inputs to
Emission Equations and for Which the Reporting Deadline Is March 31,
2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specific data
elements for which
reporting date is
March 31, 2015
Rule citation (40 (``All'' means all
Subpart CFR part 98) data elements in the
cited paragraph are
not required to be
reported until March
31, 2015)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
L........................... 98.126(b)(1)........ Only data used in
calculating the
absolute errors and
data used in
calculating the
relative errors.
L........................... 98.126(b)(2)........ All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(6)........ Only mass of each
fluorine-containing
reactant fed into
the process.
L........................... 98.126(b)(7)........ Only mass of each
fluorine-containing
product produced by
the process.
L........................... 98.126(b)(8)(i)..... Only mass of each
fluorine-containing
product that is
removed from the
process and fed
into the
destruction device.
L........................... 98.126(b)(8)(ii).... Only mass of each
fluorine-containing
by-product that is
removed from the
process and fed
into the
destruction device.
L........................... 98.126(b)(8)(iii)... Only mass of each
fluorine-containing
reactant that is
removed from the
process and fed
into the
destruction device.
L........................... 98.126(b)(8)(iv).... Only mass of each
fluorine-containing
by-product that is
removed from the
process and
recaptured.
L........................... 98.126(b)(8)(v)..... All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(9)(i)..... All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(9)(ii).... All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(9)(iii)... All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(10)....... All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(11)....... All.
L........................... 98.126(b)(12)....... All.
L........................... 98.126(c)(1)........ Only quantity of the
process activity
used to estimate
emissions.
L........................... 98.126(c)(2)........ All.
L........................... 98.126(d)........... Only estimate of
missing data.
L........................... 98.126(f)(1)........ All.
L........................... 98.126(g)(1)........ All.
L........................... 98.126(h)(2)........ All.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart L--[Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 98.126 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text and (a)(5); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (j).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 98.126 Data reporting requirements.
(a) All facilities. In addition to the information required by
Sec. 98.3(c), you must report the information in paragraphs (a)(2)
through (a)(6) of this section according to the schedule in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (j)
of this section or in Sec. 98.3(c)(4)(vii) and Table A-7 of Subpart A
of this part.
* * * * *
(5) The methods used to determine the mass emissions of each
fluorinated GHG, i.e., mass balance, process-vent-specific emission
factor, or process-vent-specific emission calculation factor, at the
facility. If you use the process-vent-specific emission factor or
process-vent-specific emission calculation factor method, report the
methods used to estimate emissions from equipment leaks.
* * * * *
(j) Special provisions for reporting years 2011 and 2012 only. For
reporting years 2011 and 2012, the owner or operator of a facility must
comply with paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), and (j)(3) of this section.
(1) Timing. The owner or operator of a facility is not required to
report the data elements at Sec. 98.3(c)(4)(iii) and Sec.
98.126(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and
(h) of this section until the later of March 31, 2014 or the date set
forth for that data element at Sec. 98.3(c)(4)(vii) and Table A-7 of
Subpart A of this part.
(2) Excess emissions. Excess emissions of fluorinated GHGs
resulting from destruction device malfunctions must be reflected in the
reported facility-wide CO2e emissions but are not required
to be reported separately.
(3) Calculation and reporting of CO2e. You must report
the total fluorinated
[[Page 51490]]
GHG emissions covered by this subpart, expressed in metric tons of
CO2e. This includes emissions from all fluorinated gas
production processes, all fluorinated gas transformation processes that
are not part of a fluorinated gas production process, all fluorinated
gas destruction processes that are not part of a fluorinated gas
production process or a fluorinated gas transformation process, and
venting of residual fluorinated GHGs from containers returned from the
field. To convert fluorinated GHG emissions to CO2e for
reporting under this section, use Equation A-1 of Sec. 98.2. For
fluorinated GHGs whose GWPs are not listed in Table A-1 of Subpart A of
this part, use either the default GWP specified below or your best
estimate of the GWP based on the information described in Sec.
98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(3). Use of quantitative structure activity
relationships (QSARs) is an acceptable method for determining GWPs in
situations where pure standards of the ``target'' fluorinated GHG are
not available, the ``target'' fluorinated GHG cannot be isolated from
gas streams, and FTIR spectra for the impurities are not available.
(i) If you choose to use a default GWP rather than your best
estimate of the GWP for fluorinated GHGs whose GWPs are not listed in
Table A-1 to this subpart, use a default GWP of 10,000 for fluorinated
GHGs that are fully fluorinated GHGs and use a default GWP of 2000 for
other fluorinated GHGs.
(ii) Provide the total annual emissions across fluorinated GHGs for
the entire facility, in metric tons of CO2e, that were
calculated using the default GWP of 2000.
(iii) Provide the total annual emissions across fluorinated GHGs
for the entire facility, in metric tons of CO2e, that were
calculated using the default GWP of 10,000.
(iv) Provide the total annual emissions across fluorinated GHGs for
the entire facility, in metric tons of CO2e, that were
calculated using your best estimate of the GWP.
0
5. Amend Sec. 98.127 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text.
0
b. Adding paragraph (k).
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 98.127 Records that must be retained.
In addition to the records required by Sec. 98.3(g), you must
retain the dated records specified in paragraphs (a) through (k) of
this section, as applicable.
* * * * *
(k) For fluorinated GHGs whose GWPs are not listed in Table A-1 to
subpart A of this part, maintain records of the GWPs used to calculate
facility-wide CO2e emissions under Sec. 98.127(j). Where
you used your best estimate of the GWP, maintain records of the data
and analysis used to develop that GWP, including the data elements at
Sec. 98.123(c)(1)(vi)(A)(1)through (3). If you have used QSARs to
estimate the GWP, include information documenting the level of accuracy
of the QSAR-derived GWP, including information on how the structure of
the ``target'' fluorinated GHG is similar to the structures of the
fluorinated GHGs used to model the radiative forcing and/or reaction
rate of the ``target'' fluorinated GHG, the quality and quantity of the
measurements of the radiative forcings and/or reaction rates of the
fluorinated GHGs used to model these parameters for the ``target''
fluorinated GHG, any estimated uncertainties of the modeled forcings
and/or reaction rates, and descriptions and results of any efforts to
validate the QSAR model(s).
0
6. Amend Sec. 98.128 by adding the definition of ``Fully fluorinated
GHGs'' in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 98.128 Definitions.
* * * * *
Fully fluorinated GHGs means fluorinated GHGs that contain only
single bonds and in which all available valence locations are filled by
fluorine atoms. This includes but is not limited to saturated
perfluorocarbons, SF6, NF3,
SF5CF3, fully fluorinated linear, branched and
cyclic alkanes, fully fluorinated ethers, fully fluorinated tertiary
amines, fully fluorinated aminoethers, and perfluoropolyethers.
* * * * *
Subpart W--[Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 98.233 by:
0
a. In paragraph (e)(5), revising Equation W-6 and all of its
definitions;
0
b. Revising paragraph (f)(1) introductory text, Equation W-7, and the
definition of parameter ``Tp'' in Equation W-7, removing the
definition of parameter ``FRp'', and adding in its place the
definition of parameter ``FR'';
0
c. Revising paragraphs (f)(1)(i) introductory text and (f)(1)(i)(A).
0
d. In paragraph (f)(2), revising Equation W-8 and the definitions of
parameters ``SPp'', ``Vp'', and
``HRp,q'' in Equation W-8;
0
e. Revising paragraph (f)(3) introductory text, Equation W-9, and the
definitions of parameters ``W'', ``Vp'', and
``HRp,q'' in Equation W-9;
0
f. In paragraph (g), revising Equations W-10A and W-10B, removing the
definitions of ``FRM'', ``PRp'', ``EnFp'',
``SGp'', and ``FVp'', and adding in their place
respectively the definitions of ``FRMs'',
``PRs,p'', ``EnFs,p'', ``SGs,p'', and
``FVs,p'';
0
g. Revising paragraph (g)(1) introductory text;
0
h. In paragraph (g)(1)(ii), revising Equations W-11A and W-11B, and the
definitions of parameter ``A'' in both Equations W-11A and W-11B, and
removing the definitions of parameter ``FR'' in both Equations W-11A
and W-11B,, and adding in their place respectively the definitions of
parameter ``FRa'';
0
i. In paragraph (g)(1)(iii), revising Equation W-12, and all of its
definitions;
0
j. Revising paragraph (g)(3)(i);
0
k. In paragraph (h), revising the definition of parameter
``Es,n'' in Equation W-13;
0
l. In paragraph (i)(3), revising the definition of parameter
``ES,N'' in Equation W-14A, revising Equation W-14B,
removing the definition of parameter ``Ta'' in Equation W-
14B, and adding in its place the definition of parameter
``Ta,p'';
0
m. Revising paragraph (j)(5) introductory text and the definition of
parameters ``Count'' and ``1,000'' in Equation W-15;
0
n. In paragraph (l)(3) introductory text revising the definition of
parameter ``PR'' in Equation W-17B;
0
o. Removing and reserving paragraph (n)(7);
0
p. In paragraph (o)(5) introductory text, revising Equation W-23,
removing the definition of parameter ``Es,i'', and adding in
its place the definition of parameter ``Es,i,m'' .
0
q. In paragraph (o)(6), revising Equation W-24 and the definition of
parameter ``m'', and removing the definition of parameter
``MTm'', and adding in its place the definition of parameter
``MTm,p'';
0
r. In paragraph (o)(7), revising the definition of ``EFi''
in Equation W-25;
0
s. In paragraph (p)(7) introductory text, revising Equation W-27,
removing the definition of parameter ``Es,i'' in Equation W-
27, and adding in its place the definition of parameter
``Es,i,m'';
0
t. In paragraph (p)(7)(i) introductory text, revising Equation W-28 and
the definition of parameter ``m'', and removing the definition of
parameter ``MTm'', and adding in its place the definition of
parameter ``MTm,p'';
0
u. Revising paragraph (r)(2) introductory text;
0
v. Revising paragraph (r)(6)(ii) introductory text;
0
w. Revising paragraph (t) introductory text, paragraph (t)(1)
introductory text, and the definition of parameters ``Es,n''
and ``Ea,n'' in Equation W-33;
[[Page 51491]]
0
x. In paragraph (v), revising the definition of ``[rho]i''
in Equation W-36;
0
y. In paragraph (z)(2)(iii), removing the definition of
``ECO2'' in Equations W-39A and W-39B, and adding in its
place the definition of ``Ea,CO2'';
0
z. In paragraph (z)(2)(vi), revising the definition of parameter
``HHV'' in Equation W-40.
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 98.233 Calculating GHG emissions.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.003
Where:
Es,n = Annual natural gas emissions at standard
conditions in cubic feet.
H = Height of the dehydrator vessel (ft).
D = Inside diameter of the vessel (ft).
P1 = Atmospheric pressure (psia).
P2 = Pressure of the gas (psia).
P = pi (3.14).
%G = Percent of packed vessel volume that is gas.
N = Number of dehydrator openings in the calendar year.
100 = Conversion of %G to fraction.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) Calculation Methodology 1. For at least one well of each unique
well tubing diameter group and pressure group combination in each sub-
basin category (see Sec. 98.238 for the definitions of tubing diameter
group, pressure group, and sub-basin category), where gas wells are
vented to the atmosphere to expel liquids accumulated in the tubing, a
recording flow meter shall be installed on the vent line used to vent
gas from the well (e.g., on the vent line off the wellhead separator or
atmospheric storage tank) according to methods set forth in Sec.
98.234(b). Calculate emissions from well venting for liquids unloading
using Equation W-7 of this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.004
* * * * *
Tp = Cumulative amount of time in hours of venting for
each well, p, of the same tubing diameter group and pressure group
combination in a sub-basin during the year.
FR = Average flow rate in cubic feet per hour for all measured wells
venting for the duration of the liquids unloading, under actual
conditions as determined in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section.
(i) Determine the well vent average flow rate as specified under
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section for at least one well in a unique
well tubing diameter group and pressure group combination in each sub-
basin category.
(A) The average flow rate per hour of venting is calculated for
each unique tubing diameter group and pressure group combination in
each sub-basin category by dividing the recorded total flow by the
recorded time (in hours) for all measured liquid unloading events with
venting to the atmosphere.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.005
* * * * *
SPp = For each well, p, shut-in pressure or surface
pressure for wells with tubing production or casing pressure for
each well with no packers in pounds per square inch absolute (psia);
or casing-to-tubing pressure ratio of one well with no packer from
the same sub-basin multiplied by the tubing pressure of each well,
p, in the sub-basin, in pounds per square inch absolute (psia).
Vp = Number of unloading events per year per well, p.
* * * * *
HRp,q = Hours that each well, p, was left open to the
atmosphere during each unloading event, q.
* * * * *
(3) Calculation Methodology 3. Calculate emissions from well
venting to the atmosphere for liquids unloading with plunger lift
assist using Equation W-9 of this section.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.006
* * * * *
W = Total number of wells with plunger lift assist and well venting
for liquids unloading for each sub-basin.
* * * * *
Vp = Number of unloading events per year for each well,
p.
* * * * *
HRp,q = Hours that each well, p, was left open to the
atmosphere during each unloading event, q.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
[[Page 51492]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.007
* * * * *
FRMs = Ratio of flowback during well completions and
workovers from hydraulic fracturing to 30-day production rate from
Equation W-12.
PRs,p = First 30-day average production flow rate in
standard cubic feet per hour of each well p, as required in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section.
EnFs,p = Volume of CO2 or N2
injected gas in cubic feet at standard conditions that was injected
into the reservoir during an energized fracture job for each well p.
If the fracture process did not inject gas into the reservoir, then
EnFs,p is 0. If injected gas is CO2 then
EnFs,p is 0.
SGs,p = Volume of natural gas in cubic feet at standard
conditions that was recovered into a flow-line for well p as per
paragraph (g)(3) of this section. This parameter includes any
natural gas that is injected into the well for clean-up. If no gas
was recovered, SGs,p is 0.
FVs,p = Flow volume of each well (p) in standard cubic
feet measured using a recording flow meter (digital or analog) on
the vent line to measure flowback during the completion or workover
according to methods set forth in Sec. 98.234(b).
(1) The average flow rate for flowback during well completions and
workovers from hydraulic fracturing shall be determined using
measurement(s) for Calculation Methodology 1 or calculation(s) for
Calculation Methodology 2 described in this paragraph (g)(1) of this
section. If Equation W-10A is used, the number of measurements or
calculations shall be determined per sub-basin and well type
(horizontal or vertical) as follows: at least one measurement or
calculation for less than or equal to 25 completions or workovers; at
least two measurements or calculations for 26 to 50 completions or
workovers; at least three measurements or calculations for 51 to 100
completions or workovers; at least four measurements or calculations
for 101 to 250 completions or workovers; and at least five measurements
or calculations for greater than 250 completions or workovers.
* * * * *
(ii) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.008
Where:
FRa = Average flow rate in cubic feet per hour, under
actual subsonic flow conditions.
A = Cross sectional open area of the restriction orifice (m\2\).
* * * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.009
Where:
FRa = Average flow rate in cubic feet per hour, under
actual sonic flow conditions.
A = Cross sectional open area of the restriction orifice (m\2\).
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.010
Where:
FRMs = Ratio of flowback rate during well completions and
workovers from hydraulic fracturing to 30-day production rate.
FRs,p = Measured flowback rate from Calculation
Methodology 1 described in paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section or
calculated flow rate from Calculation Methodology 2 described in
paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section in standard cubic feet per hour
for well(s) p for each sub-basin and well type (horizontal or
vertical) combination. Measured and calculated FRa values
shall be converted from actual conditions (FRa) to
standard conditions (FRs,p) for each well p using
Equation W-33 in paragraph (t) of this section. You may not use flow
volume as used in Equation W-10B converted to a flow rate for this
parameter.
PRs,p = First 30-day production rate in standard cubic
feet per hour for each well p that was measured in the sub-basin and
well type combination.
N = Number of measured or calculated well completions or workovers
using hydraulic fracturing in a sub-basin and well type combination.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Use the factor SGs,P in Equation W-10A of this
section, to adjust the emissions estimated in paragraphs (g)(1) through
(g)(4) of this section by the magnitude of emissions captured using
purpose designed equipment that separates saleable gas from the
flowback as determined by engineering estimate based on best available
data.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
* * * * *
Es,n = Annual natural gas emissions in standard cubic
feet from gas well venting during well completions and workovers
without hydraulic fracturing.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(3) * * *
* * * * *
Es,n = Annual natural gas venting emissions at standard
conditions from blowdowns in cubic feet.
* * * * *
[[Page 51493]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.011
* * * * *
Ta,p = Temperature at actual conditions in the unique
physical volume ([deg]F) for each blowdown ``p''.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(5) Calculation Methodology 5. For well pad gas-liquid separators
and for wells flowing off a well pad without passing through a gas-
liquid separator with annual average daily throughput of oil less than
10 barrels per day use Equation W-15 of this section:
* * * * *
Count = Total number of separators or wells with annual average
daily throughput less than 10 barrels per day. Count only separators
or wells that feed oil directly to the storage tank.
1,000 = Conversion from thousand standard cubic feet to standard
cubic feet.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(3) * * *
* * * * *
PR = Average annual production rate in actual cubic feet per day for
the gas well(s) being tested.
* * * * *
(o) * * *
(5) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.012
* * * * *
Es,i,m = Annual total volumetric GHG emissions at
standard conditions from each centrifugal compressor for mode-source
combination m, in cubic feet.
* * * * *
(6) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.013
* * * * *
MTm,p = Flow measurements from all centrifugal compressor
sources in each mode-source combination, m, for each measured
compressor, p, in standard cubic feet per hour.
m = Compressor mode-source combination as listed in paragraphs
(o)(1)(i) through (o)(1)(iii).
* * * * *
(7) * * *
Where:
EFi = Emission factor for GHGi. Use 1.2 x
10\7\ standard cubic feet per year per compressor for CH4
and 5.30 x 10\5\ standard cubic feet per year per compressor for
CO2 at 60[emsp14][deg]F and 14.7 psia.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(7) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.014
* * * * *
Es,i,m = Annual total volumetric GHG emissions at
standard conditions from each reciprocating compressor for mode-
source combination m, in cubic feet.
(i) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AU12.015
* * * * *
MTm,p = Flow measurements from all reciprocating
compressor sources in each mode-source combination, m, for each
measured compressor, p, in standard cubic feet per hour.
m = Compressor mode-source combination as listed in (p)(1) through
(p)(3).
* * * * *
(r) * * *
(2) Onshore petroleum and natural gas production facilities shall
use the appropriate default population emission factors listed in Table
W-1A of this subpart for equipment leaks from valves, connectors, open
ended lines, pressure relief valves, pump, flanges, and other. Major
equipment and components associated with gas wells are considered gas
service components in reference to Table W-1A of this subpart and major
natural gas equipment in reference to Table W-1B of this subpart. Major
equipment and components associated with crude oil wells are considered
crude service components in reference to Table W-1A of this subpart and
major crude oil equipment in reference to Table W-1C of this subpart.
Where facilities conduct EOR operations the emissions factor listed in
Table W-1A of this subpart
[[Page 51494]]
shall be used to estimate all streams of gases, including recycle
CO2 stream. The component count can be determined using
either of the methodologies described in this paragraph (r)(2). The
same methodology must be used for the entire calendar year.
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) Emissions from all above grade metering-regulating stations
(including above grade TD transfer stations) shall be calculated by
applying the emission factor calculated in Equation W-32 and the total
count of meter/regulator runs at all above grade metering-regulating
stations (inclusive of TD transfer stations) to Equation W-31. The
facility wide emission factor in Equation W-32 will be calculated by
using the total volumetric GHG emissions at standard conditions for all
equipment leak sources calculated in Equation W-30B in paragraph (q)(8)
of this section and the count of meter/regulator runs located at above
grade transmission-distribution transfer stations that were monitored
over the years that constitute one complete cycle as per paragraph
(q)(8)(i) of this section. A meter on a regulator run is considered one
meter/regulator run. Reporters that do not have above grade T-D
transfer stations shall report a count of above grade metering-
regulating stations only and do not have to comply with Sec.
98.236(c)(16)(xix).
* * * * *
(t) Volumetric emissions. If equation parameters in Sec. 98.233
are already at standard conditions, which results in volumetric
emissions at standard conditions, then this paragraph does not apply.
Calculate volumetric emissions at standard conditions as specified in
paragraphs (t)(1) or (2) of this section, with actual pressure and
temperature determined by engineering estimates based on best available
data unless otherwise specified.
(1) Calculate natural gas volumetric emissions at standard
conditions using actual natural gas emission temperature and pressure,
and Equation W-33 of this section for conversions of Ea,n or
conversions of FRa (whether sub-sonic or sonic).
* * * * *
Es,n = Natural gas volumetric emissions at standard
temperature and pressure (STP) conditions in cubic feet, except
Es,n equals FRs,p for each well p when
calculating either subsonic or sonic flowrates under 98.233(g).
Ea,n = Natural gas volumetric emissions at actual
conditions in cubic feet, except Ea,n equals
FRa,p for each well p when calculating either subsonic or
sonic flowrates under 98.233(g).
* * * * *
(v) * * *
* * * * *
Pi = Density of GHGi. Use 0.0526 kg/ft\3\ for
CO2 and N2O, and 0.0192 kg/ft\3\ for
CH4 at 60[deg]F and 14.7 psia.
* * * * *
(z) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
* * * * *
Ea,CO2 = Contribution of annual CO2 emissions
from portable or stationary fuel combustion sources in cubic feet,
under actual conditions.
* * * * *
(vi) * * *
* * * * *
HHV = For the higher heating value for field gas or process vent
gas, use 1.235 x 10-3 mmBtu/scf for HHV.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 98.236 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(D).
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(9) introductory text.
0
c. Revising paragraphs (c)(13)(i)(G), (c)(13)(ii)(C), (c)(13)(iii)(C),
(c)(13)(iv), and (c)(13)(v)(B).
0
d. Revising paragraphs (c)(14)(i)(C), (c)(14)(ii)(C), (c)(14)(iii)(C),
(c)(14)(iv), and (c)(14)(v)(B).
0
e. Revising paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B), (c)(15)(i)(C), and
(c)(15)(ii)(A).
0
f. Revising paragraph (c)(17)(v). The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 98.236 Data reporting requirements.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Average internal casing diameter, in inches, for all wells,
where applicable.
* * * * *
(9) For transmission tank emissions identified in Sec. 98.233(k)
from scrubber dump valves report the following:
* * * * *
(13) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) Report seal oil degassing vent emissions for compressors
measured and for compressors not measured in metric tons of
CO2e for each gas.
(ii) * * *
(C) Report blowdown vent emissions when in operating mode in metric
tons of CO2e for each gas.
(iii) * * *
(C) Report the isolation valve leakage emissions in not operating,
depressurized mode in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(iv) Report total annual compressor emissions from all modes of
operation in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(v) * * *
(B) Report annual emissions in metric tons of CO2e for
each gas (refer to Equation W-25 of Sec. 98.233) collectively.
(14) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Report rod packing emissions for compressors measured and for
compressors not measured in metric tons of CO2e for each
gas.
(ii) * * *
(C) Report blowdown vent emissions when in operating and standby
pressurized modes in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(iii) * * *
(C) Report isolation valve leakage emissions in not operating,
depressurized mode in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(iv) Report total annual compressor emissions from all modes of
operation in metric tons of CO2e for each gas.
(v) * * *
(B) Report annual emissions in metric tons of CO2e for
each gas collectively (refer to Equation W-29 of Sec. 98.233).
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) For onshore natural gas processing, range of concentrations of
CH4 and CO2 (refer to Equation W-30A of Sec.
98.233).
(C) Annual CO2 and CH4 emissions in metric
tons CO2e for each gas (refer to Equation W-30A of Sec.
98.233), by component type.
(ii) * * *
(A) For source categories Sec. 98.230(a)(5), (a)(6), and (a)(7),
total count for each component type in Tables W-4, W-5, and W-6 of this
subpart for which there is a population emission factor, listed by
major heading and component type.
* * * * *
(17) * * *
(v) For each EOR pump, report annual CO2 emissions,
expressed in metric tons CO2e for each gas.
* * * * *
0
9. Revise Table A-1A of Subpart W of part 98 to read as follows:
[[Page 51495]]
Table A-1A of Subpart W--Default Whole Gas Emission Factors for Onshore
Petroleum and Natural Gas Production
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission
factor (scf/
Onshore petroleum and natural gas production hour/
component)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern U.S.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Emission Factors--All Components, Gas Service \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve................................................... 0.027
Connector............................................... 0.003
Open-ended Line......................................... 0.061
Pressure Relief Valve................................... 0.040
Low Continuous Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents \2\......... 1.39
High Continuous Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents \2\........ 37.3
Intermittent Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents \2\........... 13.5
Pneumatic Pumps \3\..................................... 13.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Emission Factors--All Components, Light Crude Service \4\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve................................................... 0.05
Flange.................................................. 0.003
Connector............................................... 0.007
Open-ended Line......................................... 0.05
Pump.................................................... 0.01
Other \5\............................................... 0.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Emission Factors--All Components, Heavy Crude Service \6\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve................................................... 0.0005
Flange.................................................. 0.0009
Connector (other)....................................... 0.0003
Open-ended Line......................................... 0.006
Other \5\............................................... 0.003
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western U.S.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Emission Factors--All Components, Gas Service \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve................................................... 0.121
Connector............................................... 0.017
Open-ended Line......................................... 0.031
Pressure Relief Valve................................... 0.193
Low Continuous Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents \2\......... 1.39
High Continuous Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents \2\........ 37.3
Intermittent Bleed Pneumatic Device Vents \2\........... 13.5
Pneumatic Pumps \3\..................................... 13.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Emission Factors--All Components, Light Crude Service \4\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve................................................... 0.05
Flange.................................................. 0.003
Connector (other)....................................... 0.007
Open-ended Line......................................... 0.05
Pump.................................................... 0.01
Other \5\............................................... 0.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population Emission Factors--All Components, Heavy Crude Service \6\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve................................................... 0.0005
Flange.................................................. 0.0009
Connector (other)....................................... 0.0003
Open-ended Line......................................... 0.006
Other \5\............................................... 0.003
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For multi-phase flow that includes gas, use the gas service
emissions factors.
\2\ Emission Factor is in units of ``scf/hour/device.''
\3\ Emission Factor is in units of ``scf/hour/pump.''
\4\ Hydrocarbon liquids greater than or equal to 20[deg]API are
considered ``light crude.''
\5\ ``Others'' category includes instruments, loading arms, pressure
relief valves, stuffing boxes, compressor seals, dump lever arms, and
vents.
\6\ Hydrocarbon liquids less than 20[deg]API are considered ``heavy
crude.''
0
10. Amend Table W-5 of Subpart W of part 98 by revising the entry for
``Vapor Recovery Compressor'' to read as follows:
Table W-5 of Subpart W--Default Methane Emission Factors for Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG) Storage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission
factor (scf/
LNG Storage hour/
component)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Vapor Recovery Compressor \2\........................... 4.17
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Emission Factor is in units of ``scf/hour/device.''
* * * * *
Subpart TT--[Amended]
0
11. Amend Sec. 98.460 by adding paragraph (c)(2)(xiii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 98.460 Definition of source category.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(xiii) Other waste material that has a DOC value of 0.3 weight
percent (on a wet basis) or less. DOC value must be determined using a
60-day anaerobic biodegradation test procedure identified in Sec.
98.464(b)(4)(i)(A).
* * * * *
0
12. Section 98.464(b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 98.464 Monitoring and QA/QVC requirements.
* * * * *
(b) For each waste stream placed in the landfill during the
reporting year for which you choose to determine volatile solids
concentration for the purposes of Sec. 98.460(c)(2)(xii) or choose to
determine a landfill-specific DOCx for use in Equation TT-1 of this
subpart or for the purposes of Sec. 98.460(c)(2)(xiii) of this
subpart, you must collect and test a representative sample of that
waste stream using the methods specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(b)(4) of this section.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-19957 Filed 8-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P