Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Surveys on the South Farallon Islands, California, 50990-50998 [2012-20790]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50990-50998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XC153


Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; 
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Surveys 
on the South Farallon Islands, California

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request 
for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS has received an application from the National Ocean 
Service's Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Gulf of the Farallones 
National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS) for an Incidental Harassment 
Authorization (IHA) to take marine mammals, by harassment, incidental 
to rocky intertidal monitoring work and searching for black abalone, 
components of the Sanctuary Ecosystem Assessment Surveys. Pursuant to 
the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on 
its proposal to issue an IHA to GFNMS to incidentally take, by Level B 
harassment only, marine mammals during the specified activity.

DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than 
September 24, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Michael 
Payne, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910. The mailbox address for providing email 
comments is ITP.Nachman@noaa.gov. NMFS is not responsible for email 
comments sent to addresses other than the one provided here. Comments 
sent via email, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-
megabyte file size.
    Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record 
and will generally be posted to https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm without change. All Personal Identifying Information 
(e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be 
publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or 
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
    An electronic copy of the application containing a list of the 
references used in this document may be obtained by writing to the 
address specified above, telephoning the contact listed below (see FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. NMFS is also preparing an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance with the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and will consider comments submitted in 
response to this notice as part of that process. The EA will be posted 
at the foregoing Internet site once it is finalized. Documents cited in 
this notice may also be viewed, by appointment, during regular business 
hours, at the aforementioned address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) 
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the 
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine 
mammals by U.S. citizens who

[[Page 50991]]

engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a 
specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either 
regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a 
notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the public for 
review.
    Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds 
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or 
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the 
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where 
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking, other means of 
effecting the least practicable impact on the species or stock and its 
habitat, and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and 
reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible 
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``* * * an impact resulting from the 
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not 
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through 
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
    Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process 
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization 
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment. 
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS review of 
an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment period on 
any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of marine 
mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the comment period, NMFS must 
either issue or deny the authorization. Except with respect to certain 
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: 
``any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential 
to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A 
harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or 
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral 
patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, 
breeding, feeding, or sheltering [Level B harassment].''

Summary of Request

    On May 13, 2012, NMFS received an application from GFNMS for the 
taking of marine mammals incidental to rocky intertidal monitoring work 
and searching for black abalone. NMFS determined that the application 
was adequate and complete on July 20, 2012.
    GFNMS proposes to continue rocky intertidal monitoring work and the 
search for black abalone in areas previously unexplored for black 
abalone for periods of 4-8 days in November 2012 and February 2013. All 
work will be done only during daylight minus low tides. This is a long-
term study that began in 1992 and at present is anticipated to continue 
beyond November 2013. This IHA, if issued, though, would only be 
effective for a 12-month period from the date of its issuance. In 
future years (depending on funding), survey activities may occur in 
February, August, and November. For purposes of the present 
application, four sites will be sampled during both November and 
February, with two additional sites to be sampled in February only. The 
following specific aspects of the proposed activities are likely to 
result in the take of marine mammals: presence of survey personnel near 
pinniped haulout sites and approach of survey personnel towards hauled 
out pinnipeds. Take, by Level B harassment only, of individuals of five 
species of marine mammals is anticipated to result from the specified 
activity.

Description of the Specified Activity and Specified Geographic Region

    Since the listing of black abalone as ``endangered'' under the U.S. 
Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), NMFS has 
requested that GFNMS explore as much of the shoreline as possible, as 
well as document and map the location of quality habitat for black 
abalone and the location of known animals. This listing prompted the 
need to expand the search for black abalone into other areas on the 
South Farallon Islands (beyond those that have been studied since 1992) 
to gain a better understanding of the abundance and health of the black 
abalone population in this remote and isolated location. The monitoring 
is planned to remain ongoing, and efforts to assess the status and 
health of the black abalone population on the South Farallon Islands 
may take several years, and perhaps decades, because black abalone tend 
to be very cryptic and difficult to find, especially when they are 
sparse and infrequent in occurrence. In order for the assessment of 
black abalone to be more comprehensive, GFNMS needs to expand shore 
searches in areas beyond the proximity of their quantitative quadrat 
sampling areas and also into new areas on Southeast Farallon and 
Maintop (West End) Islands.
    Rocky intertidal monitoring on the Farallon Islands is now a 
component of the GFNMS Sanctuary Ecosystem Assessment Surveys (SEAS) 
long-term monitoring program and is a necessity to the management and 
protection of the sanctuary. All GFNMS SEAS monitoring projects are 
designed to provide documentation on the density and biodiversity of 
sanctuary natural resources for condition analyses, particularly for a 
baseline in the event of a major natural or human-induced perturbation. 
This program has and continues to acquire information on seasonal and 
annual changes of intertidal species abundances in 1-3 visits per year. 
The monitoring data, decades from now, can also be used to assess 
trends and changes from global climate change and ocean acidification, 
based on range extensions, changes in biodiversity, and changes in 
density of calcium carbonate-containing organisms.
    Routine shore activity will continue to involve the use of only 
non-destructive sampling methods to monitor rocky intertidal algal and 
invertebrate species abundances (see Figure 2 in GFNMS' application). 
At each sampling site, there are three to four permanent 30 x 50 cm (12 
x 20 in) quadrat sites that occur in the low, middle, and upper 
elevation tidal zones (marked by white epoxy pads in the quadrat 
corners). Three to four random quadrats (unmarked) are also sampled at 
each site every survey, if time permits. Fifty randomly selected points 
within each permanent and random quadrat are sampled, using methods 
described by Foster et al. (1991) and Dethier et al. (1993). All algal 
and sessile macroinvertebrate species under each sampling point (loci) 
are recorded. A photograph is also taken of each labeled quadrat. When 
completed, a shore walk in the immediate proximity is done by the 
sampling team to search for select large invertebrates. The length of 
the shoreline searched in the shore walks is typically about 30 m (98 
ft), but plans are to expand this search effort over larger areas for 
abalone and in more areas. The sampling, photographic documentation, 
and shore walks for the period of this IHA have been scheduled to occur 
in November 2012 and February 2013. (In future years, surveys conducted 
under separate IHA(s) may occur 3 times annually: February, August, and 
November, based on funding.) Each survey will last for approximately 4 
to 8 days. All work will be done only during daylight minus, low tides. 
Each location (as listed in Tables 2 and 3 in GFNMS' application) will 
be visited/sampled by three to four biologists, for a duration of 3-4 
hours, one to two times each minus tide cycle, during November and 
February.
    Inaccessible shore areas will be surveyed by boat up to once each 
year, dependent on boat availability and

[[Page 50992]]

weather conditions. This effort includes the Middle and North Farallon 
Islands. In this effort, the boat navigates to within 15-100 m (49-328 
ft) of the shore, and intertidal species that can be seen through 
binoculars are recorded (presence/absence). PRBO Conservation Science 
(PRBO) continues its year-round pinniped and seabird research and 
monitoring efforts on the South Farallon Islands, which began in 1968, 
under MMPA scientific research permits and IHAs. GFNMS biologists will 
gain access to the sites via boats operated by PRBO, with disturbance 
and incidental take authorized via IHAs issued to PRBO. For this 
reason, GFNMS has not requested authorization for take from disturbance 
by boat, as incidental take from that activity is authorized in a 
separate IHA.

Specified Geographic Location and Activity Timeframe

    The Farallon Islands consists of a chain of seven islands located 
approximately 48 km (30 mi) west of San Francisco, near the edge of the 
continental shelf and in the geographic center of the GFNMS (see Figure 
1 in GFNMS' application). The land of the islands above the mean high 
tide mark is designated as the Farallon National Wildlife Refuge 
(managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]), while the 
shore and subtidal below are in GFNMS. The nearshore and offshore 
waters are foraging areas for pinniped species discussed in this 
document.
    The two largest islands of the seven islands are the Southeast 
Farallon and Maintop (aka West End) Islands. These and several smaller 
rocks are collectively referred to as the South Farallon Islands and 
are the subject of this IHA request. The two largest islands are 
separated by only a 9 m (30 ft) wide surge channel. Together, these 
islands are approximately 49 hectares (120 acres) in size with an 
intertidal perimeter around both islands of 7.7 km (4.8 mi).
    Current areas that are sampled during November and February are: 
Blow Hole Peninsula; Mussel Flat; Dead Sea Lion Flat; and Low Arch (see 
Figure 2 in GFNMS' application). Current areas that are sampled only 
during February are: Raven's Cliff and Drunk Uncle Islet. Areas to be 
added for intensive black abalone assessment and habitat mapping 
sampling during November and February include: East Landing; North 
Landing; Fisherman's Bay; and Weather Service Peninsula on Southeast 
Farallon Island. Areas to be added for intensive black abalone 
assessment and habitat mapping during February only include: Ravens' 
Cliff; Indian Head; Shell Beach; and Drunk Uncle Islet (see Figure 2 in 
GFNMS' application). Each sample site will be visited one to two times 
annually per minus tide cycle for 3-4 hours each visit. Tables 2 and 3 
in GFNMS' application outline the schedule of sampling visits for each 
location.
    Specific dates of sampling in February and November of each year 
will vary, as in the past, dependent on tide conditions, boat logistics 
to the island, staff schedules, island housing availability, seabird 
breeding cycles, and at the discretion of Refuge management. Each visit 
will last approximately 4-8 days in November 2012 and February 2013.
    The shorelines on these islands, including areas above the mean 
high tide elevation, have become more heavily used over time as haulout 
sites for pinnipeds to rest, give birth, and molt. The intertidal zones 
where GFNMS conducts intertidal monitoring area also areas where 
pinnipeds can be found hauled out on the shore. Accessing portions of 
the intertidal habitat may cause incidental Level B (behavioral) 
harassment of pinnipeds through some unavoidable approaches if 
pinnipeds are hauled out directly in the study plots or while 
biologists walk from one location to another. No motorized equipment is 
involved in conducting these surveys. The species for which Level B 
harassment is requested are: California sea lions (Zalophus 
californianus californianus); harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii); 
northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris); Stellar sea lions 
(Eumetopias jubatus); and northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus).

Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity

    Many of the shores of the two South Farallon Islands provide 
resting, molting, and breeding habitat for pinniped species: northern 
elephant seals; harbor seals; California sea lions; northern fur seals; 
and Steller sea lions. California sea lion is the species anticipated 
to be encountered most frequently during the specified activity. The 
other four species are only anticipated to be encountered at some of 
the sites. Tables 2 and 3 in GFNMS' application outline the average and 
maximum expected occurrences of each species at each sampling location 
in November and February, respectively. Numbers are based on weekly 
surveys conducted by PRBO. The data in these tables are from counts 
conducted in February and November 2010 and 2011. Figures 3, 4, and 5 
in GFNMS' application depict the overlap between pinniped haulouts and 
abalone sampling sites. Of the five species noted here, only the 
eastern stock of Stellar sea lion (which is the stock found in the 
proposed activity area) is listed as threatened under the ESA and as 
depleted under the MMPA.
    We refer the public to Carretta et al., (2011) for general 
information on these species which are presented below this section. 
The publication is available on the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/po2011.pdf. Additional information on 
the status, distribution, seasonal distribution, and life history can 
also be found in GFNMS' application.

Northern Elephant Seal

    Northern elephant seals are not listed as threatened or endangered 
under the ESA, nor are they categorized as depleted under the MMPA. The 
estimated population of the California breeding stock is approximately 
124,000 animals with a minimum estimate of 74,913 (Carretta et. al., 
2011).
    Northern elephant seals range in the eastern and central North 
Pacific Ocean, from as far north as Alaska and as far south as Mexico. 
Northern elephant seals spend much of the year, generally about nine 
months, in the ocean. They are usually underwater, diving to depths of 
about 330-800 m (1,000-2,500 ft) for 20- to 30-minute intervals with 
only short breaks at the surface. They are rarely seen out at sea for 
this reason. While on land, they prefer sandy beaches.
    Northern elephant seals breed and give birth in California (U.S.) 
and Baja California (Mexico), primarily on offshore islands (Stewart et 
al., 1994), from December to March (Stewart and Huber, 1993). Males 
feed near the eastern Aleutian Islands and in the Gulf of Alaska, and 
females feed further south, south of 45[deg] N (Stewart and Huber, 
1993; Le Boeuf et al., 1993). Adults return to land between March and 
August to molt, with males returning later than females. Adults return 
to their feeding areas again between their spring/summer molting and 
their winter breeding seasons.
    The population on the Farallon Islands has declined by 3.4 percent 
per year since 1983, and in recent years numbers have fluctuated 
between 100 and 200 pups (W. Sydeman, D. Lee, unpubl. data). At 
Southeast Farallon, the population consists of approximately 500 
animals (GFNMS, 2012).

California Sea Lion

    California sea lions are not listed as threatened or endangered 
under the

[[Page 50993]]

ESA, nor are they categorized as depleted under the MMPA. The 
California sea lion is now a full species, separated from the Galapagos 
sea lion (Z. wollebaeki) and the extinct Japanese sea lion (Z. 
japonicus) (Brunner, 2003; Wolf et al., 2007; Schramm et al., 2009). 
The estimated population of the U.S. stock of California sea lion is 
approximately 296,750 animals, and the current maximum population 
growth rate is 12 percent (Carretta et al., 2011). On the Farallon 
Islands, California sea lions haul out in many intertidal areas year-
round, fluctuating from several hundred to several thousand animals.
    California sea lion breeding areas are on islands located in 
southern California, in western Baja California, Mexico, and the Gulf 
of California. During the breeding season, most California sea lions 
inhabit southern California and Mexico. Rookery sites in southern 
California are limited to the San Miguel Islands and the southerly 
Channel Islands of San Nicolas, Santa Barbara, and San Clemente 
(Carretta et. al., 2011). Males establish breeding territories during 
May through July on both land and in the water. Females come ashore in 
mid-May and June where they give birth to a single pup approximately 4-
5 days after arrival and will nurse pups for about a week before going 
on their first feeding trip. Females will alternate feeding trips with 
nursing bouts until the pup is weaned between 4 and 10 months of age 
(NMML, 2010). In central California, a small number of pups are born on 
Ano Nuevo Island, Southeast Farallon Island, and occasionally at a few 
other locations; otherwise, the central California population is 
composed of non-breeders. Breeding animals on the Farallon Islands are 
concentrated in areas where researchers generally do not visit (PRBO, 
unpub. data).

Pacific Harbor Seal

    Pacific harbor seals are not listed as threatened or endangered 
under the ESA, nor are they categorized as depleted under the MMPA. The 
estimated population of the California stock of Pacific harbor seals is 
approximately 30,196 animals (Carretta et. al., 2011).
    The animals inhabit near-shore coastal and estuarine areas from 
Baja California, Mexico, to the Pribilof Islands in Alaska. Pacific 
harbor seals are divided into two subspecies: P. v. stejnegeri in the 
western North Pacific, near Japan, and P. v. richardii in the northeast 
Pacific Ocean. The latter subspecies, recognized as three separate 
stocks, inhabits the west coast of the continental U.S., including: the 
outer coastal waters of Oregon and Washington states; Washington state 
inland waters; and Alaska coastal and inland waters.
    In California, over 500 harbor seal haulout sites are widely 
distributed along the mainland and offshore islands, and include rocky 
shores, beaches and intertidal sandbars (Lowry et al., 2005). On the 
Farallon Islands, approximately 40 to 120 Pacific harbor seals haul out 
in the intertidal areas (PRBO, unpublished data). Harbor seals mate at 
sea, and females give birth during the spring and summer, although, the 
pupping season varies with latitude. Pups are nursed for an average of 
24 days and are ready to swim minutes after being born. Harbor seal 
pupping takes place at many locations, and rookery size varies from a 
few pups to many hundreds of pups. Pupping generally occurs between 
March and June, and molting occurs between May and July (NCCOS, 2007).

Steller Sea Lion

    Steller sea lions consist of two distinct population segments: the 
western and eastern distinct population segments divided at 144[deg] 
West longitude (Cape Suckling, Alaska). The eastern distinct population 
segment of the Steller sea lion is threatened, and the western distinct 
population segment is endangered under the ESA. Both segments are 
depleted under the MMPA. The eastern distinct population segment is the 
one anticipated to occur in the proposed project area. The eastern 
segment includes sea lions living in southeast Alaska, British 
Columbia, California, and Oregon.
    Steller sea lions range along the North Pacific Rim from northern 
Japan to California (Loughlin et al., 1984), with centers of abundance 
and distribution in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands, 
respectively. The species is not known to migrate, but individuals 
disperse widely outside of the breeding season (late May through early 
July), thus potentially intermixing with animals from other areas.
    In 2011, the estimated population of the eastern distinct 
population segment ranged from a minimum of 52,847 up to 72,223 
animals, and the maximum population growth rate is 12.1 percent 
(Angliss and Allen, 2011).
    The eastern distinct population segment of Steller sea lions breeds 
on rookeries located in southeast Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, and 
California. There are no rookeries located in Washington State. Steller 
sea lions give birth in May through July, and breeding commences a 
couple of weeks after birth. Pups are weaned during the winter and 
spring of the following year.
    Despite the wide-ranging movements of juveniles and adult males in 
particular, exchange between rookeries by breeding adult females and 
males (other than between adjoining rookeries) appears low, although 
males have a higher tendency to disperse than females (NMFS, 1995; 
Trujillo et al., 2004; Hoffman et al., 2006). A northward shift in the 
overall breeding distribution has occurred, with a contraction of the 
range in southern California and new rookeries established in 
southeastern Alaska (Pitcher et al., 2007).
    The current population of eastern Steller sea lions in the proposed 
research area is estimated to number between 50 and 750 animals. 
Overall, counts of non-pups at trend sites in California and Oregon 
have been relatively stable or increasing slowly since the 1980s 
(Angliss and Allen, 2011). PRBO estimates that between 50 and 150 
Steller sea lions live on the Farallon Islands. On Southeast Farallon 
Island, the abundance of females declined an average of 3.6 percent per 
year from 1974 to 1997 (Sydeman and Allen, 1999). Pup counts on the 
Farallon Islands have generally varied from five to 15 (Hastings and 
Sydeman, 2002; PRBO, unpub. data).

Northern Fur Seal

    Northern fur seals are not listed as threatened or endangered under 
the ESA, nor are they categorized as depleted under the MMPA. Two 
stocks of northern fur seals are recognized in U.S. Pacific waters: 
Eastern Pacific stock and San Miguel Island stock. Adult females and 
juveniles migrate to the central California area (and Oregon and 
Washington) from rookeries on San Miguel Island in the Southern 
California Bight (Carretta et al., 2006) and from the Pribilof Islands 
in the Bering Sea (NCCOS, 2007).
    The most recent population estimate of the San Miguel Island stock 
is 9,968 animals (Carretta et al., 2011) and is 653,171 animals for the 
Eastern Pacific stock (Allen and Angliss, 2011). The northern fur seal 
population on the Farallon Islands has fluctuated greatly over the past 
two centuries. Current PRBO weekly counts on Maintop Island show a peak 
of 296 adult and juvenile northern fur seals and 180 pups in 2011 
(PRBO, unpub. data). Although it is difficult to differentiate, animals 
on the Farallon Islands during the time of the proposed rocky 
intertidal monitoring are likely from the San Miguel Island stock.

[[Page 50994]]

Other Marine Mammals in the Proposed Action Area

    California (southern) sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis), listed as 
threatened under the ESA and categorized as depleted under the MMPA, 
usually range in coastal waters within 2 km (1.2 mi) of shore. PRBO has 
not encountered California sea otters on Southeast Farallon Island 
during the course of seabird or pinniped research activities over the 
past five years. This species is managed by the USFWS and is not 
considered further in this notice.

Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals

    The appearance of researchers may have the potential to cause Level 
B harassment of any pinnipeds hauled out on Southeast Farallon and 
Maintop (West End) Islands. Although marine mammals are never 
deliberately approached by abalone survey personnel, approach may be 
unavoidable if pinnipeds are hauled out in the immediate vicinity of 
the permanent abalone study plots. Disturbance may result in reactions 
ranging from an animal simply becoming alert to the presence of 
researchers (e.g., turning the head, assuming a more upright posture) 
to flushing from the haul-out site into the water. NMFS does not 
consider the lesser reactions to constitute behavioral harassment, or 
Level B harassment takes, but rather assumes that pinnipeds that move 
greater than 1 m (3.3 ft) or change the speed or direction of their 
movement in response to the presence of researchers are behaviorally 
harassed, and thus subject to Level B taking. Animals that respond to 
the presence of researchers by becoming alert, but do not move or 
change the nature of locomotion as described, are not considered to 
have been subject to behavioral harassment.
    Numerous studies have shown that human activity can flush harbor 
seals off haulout sites (Allen et al., 1984; Calambokidis et al., 1991; 
Suryan and Harvey, 1999; Mortenson et al., 2000). The Hawaiian monk 
seal (Monachus schauinslandi) has been shown to avoid beaches that have 
been disturbed often by humans (Kenyon, 1972). And in one case, human 
disturbance appeared to cause Steller sea lions to desert a breeding 
area at Northeast Point on St. Paul Island, Alaska (Kenyon, 1962).
    Typically, even those reactions constituting Level B harassment 
would result at most in temporary, short-term disturbance. In any given 
study season (i.e., November 2012 and February 2013), the researchers 
will visit the islands for a total of 4-8 days each of the two months, 
and each site is not visited during both months. Visits to each site 
are thus separated by several months. Each site visit typically lasts 
3-4 hours. Therefore, disturbance of pinnipeds resulting from the 
presence of researchers lasts only for short periods of time and is 
separated by significant amounts of time in which no disturbance 
occurs. Because such disturbance is sporadic, rather than chronic, and 
of low intensity, individual marine mammals are unlikely to incur any 
detrimental impacts to vital rates or ability to forage and, thus, loss 
of fitness. Correspondingly, even local populations, much less the 
overall stocks of animals, are extremely unlikely to accrue any 
significantly detrimental impacts.
    There are three ways in which disturbance, as described previously, 
could result in more than Level B harassment of marine mammals. All 
three are most likely to be consequences of stampeding, a potentially 
dangerous occurrence in which large numbers of animals succumb to mass 
panic and rush away from a stimulus, an occurrence that is not expected 
on Southeast Farallon and Maintop Islands. The three situations are (1) 
falling when entering the water at high-relief locations; (2) extended 
separation of mothers and pups; and (3) crushing of elephant seal pups 
by large males during a stampede.
    Because hauled-out animals may move towards the water when 
disturbed, there is the risk of injury if animals stampede towards 
shorelines with precipitous relief (e.g., cliffs). However, while 
cliffs do exist on the islands, shoreline habitats near the abalone 
study sites are of steeply sloping rocks with unimpeded and non-
obstructive access to the water. If disturbed, hauled-out animals in 
these situations may move toward the water without risk of encountering 
barriers or hazards that would otherwise prevent them from leaving the 
area. In these circumstances, the risk of injury, serious injury, or 
death to hauled-out animals is very low. Thus, abalone research 
activity poses no risk that disturbed animals may fall and be injured 
or killed as a result of disturbance at high-relief locations.
    The risk of marine mammal injury, serious injury, or mortality 
associated with abalone research increases somewhat if disturbances 
occur during breeding season. These situations present increased 
potential for mothers and dependent pups to become separated and, if 
separated pairs do not quickly reunite, the risk of mortality to pups 
(through starvation) may increase. Separately, adult male elephant 
seals may trample elephant seal pups if disturbed, which could 
potentially result in the injury, serious injury, or mortality of the 
pups. The risk of either of these situations is greater in the event of 
a stampede.
    The proposed site visits in November and February fall outside of 
the pupping and breeding seasons for California sea lions, harbor 
seals, northern fur seals, and Steller sea lions. The most sensitive 
months for northern elephant seals are generally December through 
March. However, though elephant seal pups are occasionally present when 
researchers visit abalone survey sites, risk of pup mortalities is very 
low because elephant seals are far less reactive to researcher presence 
than the other two species. Further, pups are typically found on sand 
beaches, while study sites are located in the rocky intertidal zone, 
meaning that there is typically a buffer between researchers and pups. 
Finally, the caution used by researchers in approaching sites generally 
precludes the possibility of behavior, such as stampeding, that could 
result in extended separation of mothers and dependent pups or 
trampling of elephant seal pups. No research would occur where 
separation of mother and her nursing pup or crushing of pups can become 
a concern.
    In summary, NMFS does not anticipate that the proposed activities 
would result in the injury, serious injury, or mortality of pinnipeds 
because (1) the timing of research visits would preclude separation of 
mothers and pups for four of the pinniped species, as activities occur 
outside of the pupping/breeding season and (2) elephant seals are 
generally not susceptible to disturbance as a result of researchers' 
presence. In addition, researchers will exercise appropriate caution 
approaching sites, especially when pups are present and will redirect 
activities when pups are present.

Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat

    The only habitat modification associated with the proposed activity 
is the quadrat locations being marked with marine epoxy. The plot 
corners are marked with a 3x3 cm (1.2x1.2 in) patch of marine epoxy 
glued to the benchrock for relocating the quadrat sites. Markers have 
been in place since 1993, and pinniped populations have increased 
throughout the islands during this time. Maintenance is sometimes 
required, which consists of replenishing worn markers with fresh epoxy 
or replacing markers that have become dislodged. No

[[Page 50995]]

gas power tools are used, so there is no potential for noise or 
accidental fuel spills disturbing animals and impacting habitats. Thus, 
the proposed activity is not expected to have any habitat-related 
effects, including to marine mammal prey species, that could cause 
significant or long-term consequences for individual marine mammals or 
their populations.

Proposed Mitigation

    In order to issue an incidental take authorization (ITA) under 
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, NMFS must, where applicable, set 
forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to such activity, and 
other means of effecting the least practicable impact on such species 
or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, 
mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the 
availability of such species or stock for taking for certain 
subsistence uses (where relevant).
    GFNMS proposes to implement several mitigation measures to reduce 
potential take by Level B (behavioral disturbance) harassment. Measures 
include: (1) Coordinating sampling efforts with other permitted 
activities (i.e., PRBO and USFWS); (2) conducting slow movements and 
staying close to the ground to prevent or minimize stampeding; (3) 
avoiding loud noises (i.e., using hushed voices); (4) vacating the area 
as soon as sampling of the site is completed; (5) monitoring the 
offshore area for predators (such as killer whales and white sharks) 
and avoid flushing of pinnipeds when predators are observed in 
nearshore waters; (6) using binoculars to detect pinnipeds before close 
approach to avoid being seen by animals; and (7) rescheduling work at 
sites where pups are present, unless other means to accomplishing the 
work can be done without causing disturbance to mothers and dependent 
pups.
    The methodologies and actions noted in this section will be 
utilized and included as mitigation measures in any issued IHA to 
ensure that impacts to marine mammals are mitigated to the lowest level 
practicable. The primary method of mitigating the risk of disturbance 
to pinnipeds, which will be in use at all times, is the selection of 
judicious routes of approach to abalone study sites, avoiding close 
contact with pinnipeds hauled out on shore, and the use of extreme 
caution upon approach. In no case will marine mammals be deliberately 
approached by abalone survey personnel, and in all cases every possible 
measure will be taken to select a pathway of approach to study sites 
that minimizes the number of marine mammals potentially harassed. In 
general, researchers will stay inshore of pinnipeds whenever possible 
to allow maximum escape to the ocean. Each visit to a given study site 
will last for approximately 4 hours, after which the site is vacated 
and can be re-occupied by any marine mammals that may have been 
disturbed by the presence of abalone researchers. By arriving before 
low tide, worker presence will tend to encourage pinnipeds to move to 
other areas for the day before they haul out and settle onto rocks at 
low tide.
    The following measures are proposed for implementation to avoid 
disturbances to elephant seal pups. Disturbances to females with 
dependent pups can be mitigated to the greatest extent practicable by 
avoiding visits to those intertidal sites with pinnipeds that are 
actively nursing, with the exception of northern elephant seals. The 
time of year when GFNMS plans to sample avoids disturbance to young, 
dependent pups, with the exception of northern elephant seals. Thus, 
early February and November, at minimum, are preferable for the 
proposed intertidal survey work in order to minimize the risk of 
harassment. Harassment of nursing northern elephant seal pups may occur 
but only to a limited extent. Disruption of nursing to northern 
elephant seal pups will occur only as biologists pass by the area. No 
flushing on nursing northern elephant seal pups will occur, and no 
disturbance to newborn northern elephant seals (pups less than one week 
old) will occur. Moreover, elephant seals have a much higher tolerance 
of nearby human activity than sea lions or harbor seals. In the event 
of finding pinnipeds breeding and nursing, the intertidal monitoring 
activities will be re-directed to sites where these activities and 
behaviors are not occurring. This mitigation measure will reduce the 
possibility of takes by harassment and further reduce the remote 
possibility of serious injury or mortality of dependent pups.
    GFNMS will suspend sampling and monitoring operations immediately 
if an injured marine mammal is found in the vicinity of the project 
area and the abalone site sampling activities could aggravate its 
condition.
    NMFS has carefully evaluated GFNMS' proposed mitigation measures 
and considered a range of other measures in the context of ensuring 
that NMFS prescribes the means of effecting the least practicable 
impact on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and their 
habitat. Our evaluation of potential measures included consideration of 
the following factors in relation to one another:
     The manner in which, and the degree to which, the 
successful implementation of the measure is expected to minimize 
adverse impacts to marine mammals;
     The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to 
minimize adverse impacts as planned; and
     The practicability of the measure for applicant 
implementation.
    Based on our evaluation of the applicant's proposed measures, NMFS 
has preliminarily determined that the proposed mitigation measures 
provide the means of effecting the least practicable impact on marine 
mammal species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention 
to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance.

Proposed Monitoring and Reporting

    In order to issue an ITA for an activity, Section 101(a)(5)(D) of 
the MMPA states that NMFS must, where applicable, set forth 
``requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such 
taking''. The MMPA implementing regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) 
indicate that requests for ITAs must include the suggested means of 
accomplishing the necessary monitoring and reporting that will result 
in increased knowledge of the species and of the level of taking or 
impacts on populations of marine mammals that are expected to be 
present in the proposed action area.
    Currently many aspects of pinniped research are being conducted by 
PRBO scientists on the Farallon Islands, which includes elephant seal 
pup tagging and behavior observations with special notice to tagged 
animals. Additional observations are always desired, such as 
observations of pinniped carcasses bearing tags, as well as any rare or 
unusual marine mammal occurrences. GFNMS' observations and reporting 
will add to the observational database and on-going marine mammal 
assessments on the Farallon Islands.
    GFNMS can add to the knowledge of pinnipeds on the South Farallon 
Islands by noting observations of: (1) Unusual behaviors, numbers, or 
distributions of pinnipeds, such that any potential follow-up research 
can be conducted by the appropriate personnel; (2) tag-bearing 
carcasses of pinnipeds, allowing transmittal of the information to 
appropriate agencies and personnel; and (3) rare or unusual species of 
marine mammals for agency follow-up.
    Proposed monitoring requirements in relation to GFNMS' abalone 
research surveys will include observations made

[[Page 50996]]

by the applicant. Information recorded will include species counts 
(with numbers of pups/juveniles), numbers of observed disturbances, and 
descriptions of the disturbance behaviors during the abalone surveys. 
Observations of unusual behaviors, numbers, or distributions of 
pinnipeds on the South Farallon Islands will be reported to NMFS and 
PRBO so that any potential follow-up observations can be conducted by 
the appropriate personnel. In addition, observations of tag-bearing 
pinniped carcasses as well as any rare or unusual species of marine 
mammals will be reported to NMFS and PRBO.
    If at any time injury, serious injury, or mortality of the species 
for which take is authorized should occur, or if take of any kind of 
any other marine mammal occurs, and such action may be a result of the 
proposed abalone research, GFNMS will suspend research activities and 
contact NMFS immediately to determine how best to proceed to ensure 
that another injury or death does not occur and to ensure that the 
applicant remains in compliance with the MMPA.
    A draft final report must be submitted to NMFS Office of Protected 
Resources within 60 days after the conclusion of the 2012-2013 field 
season or 60 days prior to the start of the next field season if a new 
IHA will be requested. The report will include a summary of the 
information gathered pursuant to the monitoring requirements set forth 
in the IHA. A final report must be submitted to the Director of the 
NMFS Office of Protected Resources and to the NMFS Southwest Office 
Regional Administrator within 30 days after receiving comments from 
NMFS on the draft final report. If no comments are received from NMFS, 
the draft final report will be considered to be the final report.

Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment

    Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the 
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or 
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or 
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the 
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild 
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not 
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or 
sheltering [Level B harassment].
    All anticipated takes would be by Level B harassment, involving 
temporary changes in behavior. The proposed mitigation and monitoring 
measures are expected to minimize the possibility of injurious or 
lethal takes such that take by injury, serious injury, or mortality is 
considered remote. Animals hauled out close to the actual survey sites 
may be disturbed by the presence of biologists and may alter their 
behavior or attempt to move away from the researchers. No motorized 
equipment is involved in conducting the proposed abalone monitoring 
surveys.
    As discussed earlier, NMFS considers an animal to have been 
harassed if it moved greater than 1 m (3.3 ft) in response to the 
researcher's presence or if the animal was already moving and changed 
direction and/or speed, or if the animal flushed into the water. 
Animals that became alert without such movements were not considered 
harassed. The distribution of pinnipeds hauled out on beaches is not 
consistent throughout the year. The number of marine mammals disturbed 
will vary by month and location. PRBO obtains weekly counts of 
pinnipeds on the South Farallon Islands, dating back to the early 
1970s. GFNMS used data collected by PRBO in February and November 2010 
and 2011 (since those are the months they propose to conduct their 
abalone monitoring in 2012 and 2013) to estimate the number of 
pinnipeds that may potentially be taken by Level B (behavioral) 
harassment. Table 3 in GFNMS' IHA application and Table 1 here present 
the maximum numbers of California sea lions, harbor seals, northern 
elephant seals, northern fur seals, and Steller sea lions that may be 
present at the various sampling sites in November and February. As 
indicated in the table, some sites will be sampled in both months and 
others only in one of the two survey months. Based on this information, 
NMFS proposes to authorize the take, by Level B harassment only, of 
6,850 California sea lions, 175 harbor seals, 225 northern elephant 
seals, 20 northern fur seals, and 95 Steller sea lions. These numbers 
are considered to be maximum take estimates; therefore, actual take may 
be slightly less if animals decide to haul out at a different location 
for the day or animals are out foraging at the time of the survey 
activities.

Negligible Impact and Small Numbers Analysis and Preliminary 
Determination

    NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``* * * 
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be 
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely 
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of 
recruitment or survival.'' In making a negligible impact determination, 
NMFS considers a variety of factors, including but not limited to: (1) 
The number of anticipated mortalities; (2) the number and nature of 
anticipated injuries; (3) the number, nature, intensity, and duration 
of Level B harassment; and (4) the context in which the take occurs.
    No injuries or mortalities are anticipated to occur as a result of 
GFNMS' rocky intertidal monitoring work and searching for black 
abalone, and none are proposed to be authorized. The behavioral 
harassments that could occur would be of limited duration, as 
researchers only conduct sampling two times per year for a total of 4-8 
days each time. Additionally, each site is sampled for approximately 3-
4 hours before moving to the next sampling site. Therefore, disturbance 
will be limited to a short duration, allowing pinnipeds to reoccupy the 
sites within a short amount of time.
    Some of the pinniped species use the islands to conduct pupping 
and/or breeding. However, with the exception of northern elephant 
seals, GFNMS will conduct its abalone site sampling outside of the 
pupping/breeding seasons. GFNMS has proposed measures to minimize 
impacts to northern elephant seals nursing or tending to dependent 
pups. Such measures will avoid mother/pup separation or trampling of 
pups.
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P

[[Page 50997]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23AU12.081

BILLING CODE 3510-22-C
    Of the five marine mammal species anticipated to occur in the 
proposed activity areas, only the Steller sea lion is listed as 
threatened under the ESA. The species is also designated as depleted 
under the MMPA. Table 2 in this document presents the abundance of each 
species or stock, the proposed take estimates, and the percentage of 
the affected populations or stocks that may be taken by harassment. 
Based on these estimates, GFNMS would take less than 1% of each species 
or stock, with the exception of the California sea lion, which would 
result in an estimated take of 2.3% of the stock. Because these are 
maximum estimates, actual take numbers are likely to be lower, as some 
animals may select other haulout sites the day the researchers are 
present.
    Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the 
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into 
consideration the implementation of the proposed mitigation and 
monitoring measures, NMFS preliminarily finds that the rocky intertidal 
monitoring program will result in the incidental take of small numbers 
of marine mammals, by Level B harassment only, and that the total 
taking from the rocky intertidal monitoring program will have a 
negligible impact on the affected species or stocks.

[[Page 50998]]



 Table 2--Population Abundance Estimates, Total Proposed Level B Take, and Percentage of Population That May Be
       Taken for the Potentially Affected Species During the Proposed Rocky Intertidal Monitoring Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                   Percentage of
                           Species                                 Abundance*     Total proposed     stock or
                                                                                   level B take     population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor Seal..................................................             30,196             175             0.6
California Sea Lion..........................................            296,750           6,850             2.3
Northern Elephant Seal.......................................            124,000             225             0.2
Steller Sea Lion.............................................      58,334-72,223              95         0.1-0.2
Northern Fur Seal............................................              9,968              20             0.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Abundance estimates are taken from the 2011 U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments (Carretta et al.,
  2012).

Impact on Availability of Affected Species or Stock for Taking for 
Subsistence Uses

    There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals implicated 
by this action. Therefore, NMFS has determined that the total taking of 
affected species or stocks would not have an unmitigable adverse impact 
on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for 
subsistence purposes.

Endangered Species Act (ESA)

    There is one marine mammal species listed as threatened under the 
ESA with confirmed or possible occurrence in the proposed project area: 
the eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lion. NMFS' Permits and 
Conservation Division has determined that issuance of the proposed IHA 
to GFNMS under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA may affect this species 
and has initiated consultation with NMFS' Endangered Species Division 
under section 7 of the ESA for this activity. Consultation will be 
concluded prior to a determination on the issuance of an IHA.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    NMFS is currently preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA), 
pursuant to NEPA, to determine whether the issuance of an IHA to GFNMS 
for its 2012-2013 rocky intertidal monitoring activities may have a 
significant impact on the human environment. This analysis and a 
determination on whether to issue a Finding of No Significant Impact 
(FONSI) will be completed prior to the issuance or denial of this 
proposed IHA. This identifies our environmental issues and provides 
environmental issues relevant to the proposed action. Members of the 
public are invited to provide comments, and NMFS will consider and 
evaluate responsive comments as it prepares the EA and decides whether 
to issue a FONSI.

Proposed Authorization

    As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to 
authorize the take of marine mammals incidental to GFNMS' rocky 
intertidal and black abalone monitoring research activities, provided 
the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting 
requirements are incorporated.

    Dated: August 16, 2012.
Helen M. Golde,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-20790 Filed 8-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P