Limited Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Nevada; Clark County; Stationary Source Permits; Extension of Comment Period, 50660-50661 [2012-20497]
Download as PDF
50660
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
and consistent with Chapter 1200–03–
26–.02, Permit-Related Fees, of the
Tennessee Code. EPA has made the
preliminary determination that
Tennessee’s SIP and practices
adequately provide for permitting fees
related to the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS when necessary.
13. 110(a)(2)(M) Consultation/
participation by affected local entities:
Chapter 1200–3–9–.01(4)(k), Public
Participation, of the Tennessee SIP
requires that TDEC notify the public of
an application, preliminary
determination, the activity or activities
involved in the permit action, any
emissions change associated with any
permit modification, and the
opportunity for comment prior to
making a final permitting decision. By
way of example, TDEC has recently
worked closely with local political
subdivisions during the development of
its Transportation Conformity SIP,
Regional Haze Implementation Plan,
and Early Action Compacts. EPA has
made the preliminary determination
that Tennessee’s SIP and practices
adequately demonstrate consultation
with affected local entities related to the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS when
necessary.
V. Proposed Action
As described above, with the
exception of sub-element
110(a)(2)(E)(ii), EPA is proposing to
determine that Tennessee’s
infrastructure submission, provided to
EPA on October 19, 2009, addressed the
required infrastructure elements for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is
proposing to approve in part and
conditionally approve in part,
Tennessee’s SIP submission consistent
with section 110(k)(3) of the CAA.
As described above, with the
exception of sub-element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii)
(as it relates to section 128(a)(1)), TDEC
has addressed the elements of the CAA
110(a)(1) and (2) SIP requirements
pursuant to section 110 of the CAA to
ensure that the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS are implemented, enforced, and
maintained in Tennessee. With respect
to 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) (referencing section
128 of the CAA), EPA is proposing to
conditionally approve Tennessee’s
infrastructure SIP based on a March 28,
2012, commitment that TDEC will adopt
specific enforceable measures into its
SIP and submit these revisions to EPA
July 23, 2013, to address the applicable
portions of section 128. EPA is also
proposing to approve Tennessee’s
infrastructure submission for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS, with the
exception of sub-element
110(a)(2)(E)(ii), because its October 19,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Aug 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
2009, submission is consistent with
section 110 of the CAA.
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 8, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012–20668 Filed 8–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0566; FRL–9719–7]
Limited Approval and Disapproval of
Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Nevada; Clark County; Stationary
Source Permits; Extension of
Comment Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
EPA is extending the
comment period on a proposed limited
approval and limited disapproval
published on July 24, 2012, concerning
permit regulations for stationary sources
in Clark County, Nevada.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by September 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R09–OAR–2012–0566, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (AIR–
3), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an anonymous
access system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
50661
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
section.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, by phone: (415) 972–
3534 or by email at
yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
On July
24, 2012 (77 FR 43206), EPA proposed
a limited approval and limited
disapproval of the following regulations
submitted for approval into the Clark
County portion of the Nevada State
Implementation Plan (SIP).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED NSR RULES
Section No.
Section title
0 .................................
12.0 ............................
12.1 ............................
12.2 ............................
Definitions ...............................................................................................................................
Applicability, General Requirements and Transition Procedures ...........................................
Permit Requirements for Minor Sources ................................................................................
Permit Requirements for Major Sources in Attainment Areas (Prevention of Significant Deterioration).
Permit Requirements for Major Sources in Nonattainment Areas .........................................
Authority to Construct Application and Permit Requirements For Part 70 Sources ..............
12.3 ............................
12.4 ............................
The proposed rule provided a 30-day
public comment period. In response to
a request from Clark County submitted
by letter on August 9, 2012, EPA is
extending the comment period for an
additional 15 days.
Dated: August 13, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012–20497 Filed 8–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0001; FRL–9358–9]
Notice of Filing of Several Pesticide
Petitions Filed for Residues of
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various
Commodities
Adopted
number (PP) of interest as shown in the
body of this document, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and
request for comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of several initial filings
of pesticide petitions requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 21, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number and the pesticide petition
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Aug 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
A
contact person, with telephone number
and email address, is listed at the end
of each pesticide petition summary. You
may also reach each contact person by
mail at Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division (7511P) or
Registration Division (7505P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitted
3/6/12
11/3/09
11/3/09
3/6/12
5/22/12
2/11/10
2/11/10
5/22/12
5/18/10
5/18/10
9/01/10
9/01/10
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code
111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed at the end of the pesticide petition
summary of interest.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50660-50661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20497]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0566; FRL-9719-7]
Limited Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Nevada; Clark County; Stationary Source Permits; Extension of
Comment Period
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is extending the comment period on a proposed limited
approval and limited disapproval published on July 24, 2012, concerning
permit regulations for stationary sources in Clark County, Nevada.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by September 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-R09-OAR-
2012-0566, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (AIR-3), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901. Deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's
normal hours of operation.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected
[[Page 50661]]
should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted
through www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an
anonymous access system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, by phone: (415) 972-
3534 or by email at yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 24, 2012 (77 FR 43206), EPA proposed
a limited approval and limited disapproval of the following regulations
submitted for approval into the Clark County portion of the Nevada
State Implementation Plan (SIP).
Table 1--Submitted NSR Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section No. Section title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0............................................. Definitions........................... 3/6/12 5/22/12
12.0.......................................... Applicability, General Requirements 11/3/09 2/11/10
and Transition Procedures.
12.1.......................................... Permit Requirements for Minor Sources. 11/3/09 2/11/10
12.2.......................................... Permit Requirements for Major Sources 3/6/12 5/22/12
in Attainment Areas (Prevention of
Significant Deterioration).
12.3.......................................... Permit Requirements for Major Sources 5/18/10 9/01/10
in Nonattainment Areas.
12.4.......................................... Authority to Construct Application and 5/18/10 9/01/10
Permit Requirements For Part 70
Sources.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule provided a 30-day public comment period. In
response to a request from Clark County submitted by letter on August
9, 2012, EPA is extending the comment period for an additional 15 days.
Dated: August 13, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-20497 Filed 8-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P