Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 49796-49797 [2012-20218]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
49796
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2012 / Notices
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than September 10,
2012.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs
Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis,
Missouri 63166–2034:
1. Reliable Community Bancshares,
Inc., Perryville, Missouri; to acquire 100
percent of the voting shares of First
Southeast Missouri Bancorporation,
Inc., Scott City, Missouri, and thereby
indirectly acquire voting shares of
Security Bank and Trust Company,
Scott City, Missouri.
In connection with this application
First Southeast Acquisition Corporation,
Perryville, Missouri; has applied to
become a bank holding company by
acquiring 100 percent of the voting
shares of First Southeast Missouri
Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire Security Bank and
Trust Company, both in Scott City,
Missouri.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, August 13, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–20166 Filed 8–16–12; 8:45 am]
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than September 13,
2012.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E.
Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200
North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201–
2272:
1. HaleCo Bancshares, Inc.,
Plainview, Texas; to acquire 100 percent
of the voting shares of LubCo
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly
acquire Citizens Bank, both in Slaton,
Texas.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, August 14, 2012.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–20210 Filed 8–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
[60Day–12–12QC]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Aug 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 and
send comments to Kimberly S. Lane,
1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta,
GA 30333 or send an email to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Costs and Cost Savings of Motor
Vehicle Injury Prevention: EvidenceBased Policy and Behavioral
Interventions—NEW—National Center
for Injury Prevention and Control
(NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Motor vehicle injuries are the leading
cause of death for children, adolescents,
and young adults, and a major cause of
death for all other ages. In 2009, 33,808
people were killed in crashes in the
United States and more than 2.2 million
people were injured. Medical costs and
productivity losses associated with
traffic injuries amounted to more than
$99 billion in 2005; equivalent to about
$500 for each U.S. licensed driver. Due
to the magnitude of this injury problem
and the availability of evidence-based
policies and interventions to prevent it,
motor vehicle injury prevention has
been designated as one of the CDC’s
Winnable Battles.
CDC requests OMB approval to
support research needed to reduce the
number of motor vehicle injuries and
fatalities. This project is designed to
support state and local communities in
making evidence-based resource
allocation decisions relating to the
implementation of motor vehicle injury
prevention policies and programs. This
will be done by generating estimates of
the cost of implementing a set of
evidence-based interventions. By
combining these estimates with existing
data on the effect of each intervention
and cost of motor vehicle injuries, an
interactive, user-friendly tool will be
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
49797
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2012 / Notices
created that states can use to assess the
costs and benefits of different
interventions designed to prevent motor
vehicle injuries. The resulting tool
should help states understand the
tradeoffs and prioritize high-impact
interventions to reduce motor vehicle
injuries.
Key informant interviews will be used
to fill gaps in knowledge for
interventions that do not have extensive
literature on their costs and benefits.
Information will be collected from
Public safety advocacy groups, DWI/DUI
defense attorneys, State Departments of
specific interventions. The tool will
provide state and local policymakers
with an optimal portfolio or package of
selected interventions that are expected
to produce the highest benefit for a
specified implementation budget. The
integrated, data-driven tool will
facilitate effective planning and
policymaking at the state and local
levels by providing policymakers with a
rigorous analysis of the costs and
benefits of various options for reducing
motor vehicle injuries and fatalities.
There are no costs to respondents
other than their time.
Public Safety (members of the
Governors Highway Safety Association),
State Parole Agencies, and Local Law
Enforcement Agencies. Online expert
panel meetings will provide the
background information needed to
understand how to successfully build an
online tool that can be used to generate
a variety of state-specific and costbenefit analyses, including point
estimates and uncertainty intervals for
costs and benefits. The tool will account
for different levels of implementation
for each intervention and for
interdependencies among pairs of
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
Total burden
hours
Type of respondent
Form name
Public Safety Advocacy Groups .......
Semi-Structured
Interviews—(Attachment C).
Semi-Structured
Interviews—(Attachment D).
Semi-Structured
Interviews—(Attachment E).
Semi-Structured
Interviews—(Attachment F).
Semi-Structured
Interviews—(Attachment G).
Semi-Structured
Interviews—(Attachment H).
Discussion Guide—Online Expert
Panel—(Attachment I).
Discussion Guide—Online Expert
Panel—(Attachment I).
Discussion Guide—Online Expert
Panel—(Attachment I).
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
6
1
1
6
4
1
1
4
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
32
DWI/DUI Defense Attorneys .............
Court Case Managers .......................
State Parole Agencies ......................
State Depts. of Public Safety ............
Local Law Enforcement ....................
Academic Researchers .....................
CDC Staff ..........................................
NHTSA Staff .....................................
Total ...........................................
Kimberly S. Lane,
Deputy Director, Office of Scientific Integrity,
Office of the Associate Director for Science,
Office of the Director, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–20218 Filed 8–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Proposed Project
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–12–12EX]
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:51 Aug 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–7570 or send an
email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806.
Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.
Formative Research for the
Development of CDC’s Act Against
AIDS Social Marketing Campaigns
Targeting Consumers—New—National
Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP),
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The purpose of this study is to
conduct interviews and focus groups in
four rounds of data collections
(exploratory research, message testing,
concept testing, materials testing) with
consumer groups aged 18 to 64 over a
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3-year period to develop various social
marketing campaigns aimed at
increasing HIV testing rates, increasing
HIV awareness and knowledge,
challenging commonly held
misperceptions about HIV, and
promoting HIV prevention and risk
reduction. The research results will be
used to develop materials for six
specific HIV social marketing campaigns
under the umbrella of the larger Act
Against AIDS campaign. The target
audience for the campaigns include the
following populations, all ages 18–64
years old: (1) General U.S. population,
with an emphasis on African Americans
and Latinos; (2) men who have sex with
men (MSM), with an emphasis on
Latino MSM; and (3) HIV+ individuals.
The study will screen 2338 people per
year for eligibility. Of the 2338 people
screened, it is expected that 500 people
will participate in focus groups, 500
people will participate in in-depth
interviews and 700 will participate in
intercept interviews. All focus group
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 160 (Friday, August 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49796-49797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20218]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-12-12QC]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects.
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570
and send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-D74,
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Costs and Cost Savings of Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention:
Evidence-Based Policy and Behavioral Interventions--NEW--National
Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Motor vehicle injuries are the leading cause of death for children,
adolescents, and young adults, and a major cause of death for all other
ages. In 2009, 33,808 people were killed in crashes in the United
States and more than 2.2 million people were injured. Medical costs and
productivity losses associated with traffic injuries amounted to more
than $99 billion in 2005; equivalent to about $500 for each U.S.
licensed driver. Due to the magnitude of this injury problem and the
availability of evidence-based policies and interventions to prevent
it, motor vehicle injury prevention has been designated as one of the
CDC's Winnable Battles.
CDC requests OMB approval to support research needed to reduce the
number of motor vehicle injuries and fatalities. This project is
designed to support state and local communities in making evidence-
based resource allocation decisions relating to the implementation of
motor vehicle injury prevention policies and programs. This will be
done by generating estimates of the cost of implementing a set of
evidence-based interventions. By combining these estimates with
existing data on the effect of each intervention and cost of motor
vehicle injuries, an interactive, user-friendly tool will be
[[Page 49797]]
created that states can use to assess the costs and benefits of
different interventions designed to prevent motor vehicle injuries. The
resulting tool should help states understand the tradeoffs and
prioritize high-impact interventions to reduce motor vehicle injuries.
Key informant interviews will be used to fill gaps in knowledge for
interventions that do not have extensive literature on their costs and
benefits. Information will be collected from Public safety advocacy
groups, DWI/DUI defense attorneys, State Departments of Public Safety
(members of the Governors Highway Safety Association), State Parole
Agencies, and Local Law Enforcement Agencies. Online expert panel
meetings will provide the background information needed to understand
how to successfully build an online tool that can be used to generate a
variety of state-specific and cost-benefit analyses, including point
estimates and uncertainty intervals for costs and benefits. The tool
will account for different levels of implementation for each
intervention and for interdependencies among pairs of specific
interventions. The tool will provide state and local policymakers with
an optimal portfolio or package of selected interventions that are
expected to produce the highest benefit for a specified implementation
budget. The integrated, data-driven tool will facilitate effective
planning and policymaking at the state and local levels by providing
policymakers with a rigorous analysis of the costs and benefits of
various options for reducing motor vehicle injuries and fatalities.
There are no costs to respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondent Form name Number of responses per per response Total burden
respondents respondent (hours) hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Safety Advocacy Groups. Semi-Structured 4 1 1 4
Interviews--(At
tachment C).
DWI/DUI Defense Attorneys..... Semi-Structured 4 1 1 4
Interviews--(At
tachment D).
Court Case Managers........... Semi-Structured 4 1 1 4
Interviews--(At
tachment E).
State Parole Agencies......... Semi-Structured 2 1 1 2
Interviews--(At
tachment F).
State Depts. of Public Safety. Semi-Structured 6 1 1 6
Interviews--(At
tachment G).
Local Law Enforcement......... Semi-Structured 4 1 1 4
Interviews--(At
tachment H).
Academic Researchers.......... Discussion 3 1 1 3
Guide--Online
Expert Panel--
(Attachment I).
CDC Staff..................... Discussion 3 1 1 3
Guide--Online
Expert Panel--
(Attachment I).
NHTSA Staff................... Discussion 2 1 1 2
Guide--Online
Expert Panel--
(Attachment I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ................ .............. .............. .............. 32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kimberly S. Lane,
Deputy Director, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-20218 Filed 8-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
