Availability of the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment for Non-native Plant Control and Re-establishment of Riparian Habitats Along the Rio Grande in Seldon Canyon, Doña Ana County, NM, 49457-49458 [2012-20016]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2012 / Notices
in Book 018, Pages 02059–02062, as
Document No. 200800959.)
That certain parcel of land situated
within the Cebolleta Grant in projected
Sections 10 and 15, Township 11 North,
Range 6 West, New Mexico Principal
Meridian, Cibola County, New Mexico,
and being that certain parcel of land
described in Quit Claim Deed from
Cebolleta Ranch Ltd. Co. to Silver Dollar
Ranch, LLC, filed in the office of the
County Clerk of Cibola County, New
Mexico, on August 2, 2005, in Book
0014, Page 9122, more particularly
described by survey performed by Russ
P. Hugg, New Mexico Professional
Surveyor Number 9750, using the New
Mexico State Plane Coordinate System,
West Zone (NAD83), grid bearings and
ground distances as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest corner
of the parcel herein described (a 31⁄2″
brass cap stamped Elder Company
Property Corner mounted on a 1″ iron
pipe found in place), whence (1) the six
(6) mile marker on the South Boundary
of said Cebolleta Grant (a correctly
marked BLM Brass Cap Monument
found in place) bears S 15°19′20″ W,
5589.46 feet distant, (2) the seven (7)
mile marker on said south boundary of
the Cebolleta Grant (a correctly marked
BLM Brass Cap Monument found in
place) bears S 34°32′35″ E, 6567.42 feet
distant and (3) Angle Point No. 5 on the
North line of Tract 37 (a correctly
marked BLM Brass Cap Monument
found in place) bears N 33°09′41″ W,
2795.69 feet distant; Thence, N
17°50′59″ E, 4457.95 feet to the
Northwest corner of the parcel herein
described (a 31⁄2″ brass cap stamped
Elder Company Property Corner
mounted on a 1″ iron pipe found in
place), a point on the Westerly
boundary of the Cebolleta Ranch being
that certain parcel of land described in
Warranty Deed from John C. Dilts, Jr.,
Trustee of the John C. Dilts, Jr., Inter
Vivos Trust and Two Rivers Ranch to
Cebolleta Ranch LTD., Co., filed in the
office of the County Clerk of Cibola
County, New Mexico, on July 16, 1999,
in Book 8, page 4223; Thence, S
48°05′38″ E, 1097.13 feet along said
Westerly boundary of the Cebolleta
Ranch to the Northeast corner of the
parcel herein described (a 31⁄2″ brass cap
stamped Elder Company Property
Corner mounted on a 1″ iron pipe found
in place); Thence, S 22°45′37″ W,
4163.53 feet to the Southeast corner of
the parcel herein described (a 31⁄2″ brass
cap stamped Elder Company Property
Corner mounted on a 1″ iron pipe found
in place); Thence, N 60°07′19″ W,
659.92 feet to the Southwest corner and
point of beginning of the parcel herein
described.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Aug 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
Said Parcel II contains an area of
82.5593 acres, more or less.
The above-described Parcels I and II
contain a combined total area of
8,353.0683 acres, more or less, together
with all rights and easements
appurtenant thereto, and all water
rights, whether appurtenant or not, for
their associated purposes of use whether
for irrigation, ranching, stock, game,
wildlife, domestic, commercial,
recreation or other purposes, and from
all sources whether surface water,
groundwater, or springs, whether
permitted or unpermitted, and
including all claims for water rights,
subject to restrictions, reservations, and
easements of record insofar as the same
are in force and applicable.
This proclamation does not affect title
to the land described above, nor does it
affect any valid existing easements for
public roads and highways, public
utilities and for railroads and pipelines
and any other rights-of-way or
reservations of record.
Dated: July 20, 2012.
Donald E. Laverdure,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012–20145 Filed 8–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND
WATER COMMISSION, UNITED
STATES AND MEXICO
Availability of the Final Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Environmental
Assessment for Non-native Plant
Control and Re-establishment of
Riparian Habitats Along the Rio
˜
Grande in Seldon Canyon, Dona Ana
County, NM
United States Section,
International Boundary and Water
Commission, United States and Mexico.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the
Final Environmental Assessment (EA)
and Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI).
AGENCY:
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969; the Council on
Environmental Quality Final
Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508); and the United States Section,
Operational Procedures for
Implementing Section 102 of NEPA,
published in the Federal Register
September 2, 1981, (46 FR 44083); the
United States Section hereby gives
notice that the Final Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for Non-native Plant
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49457
Control and Re-establishment of
Riparian Habitats Along the Rio Grande
on U.S. International Boundary and
Water Commission and Bureau of Land
Management Lands are available. A
notice of finding of no significant
impact dated January 24, 2012, provided
a thirty (30) day comment period before
making the finding final. The Notice
was published in the Federal Register
on January 24, 2012 (Federal Register
Notice, Vol. 77, No. 15, Page 3497).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gilbert Anaya, Division Chief,
Environmental Management Division;
United States Section, International
Boundary and Water Commission; 4171
N. Mesa, C–100; El Paso, Texas 79902.
Telephone: (915) 832–4702, email:
Gilbert.Anaya@ibwc.gov.
BACKGROUND: This proposed project will
be part of a regional initiative to restore
the form and function of the Rio Grande
floodplain that has been undertaken by
other Federal, State, and non
government organizations. The
overarching goals of the project are to
improve the ecosystem integrity within
the project area by shifting conditions to
match those that historically existed.
This project will focus on restoring
31.35 acres divided between two tracts
of federal lands (25.85 ac USIBWC and
5.5 ac BLM) from saltcedar to native
riparian habitats by utilizing validated
mechanical and chemical control
methods to remove and control
saltcedar.
Availability: Electronic copies of the
Final EA and FONSI are available from
the USIBWC Web site at: https://
www.ibwc.gov/Organization/
Environmental/reports_studies.html.
Dated: August 3, 2012.
Steven Fitten,
General Counsel.
U.S. INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY
AND WATER COMMISSION EL PASO
FIELD OFFICE TEXAS
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
NON-NATIVE PLANT CONTROL AND
RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF RIPARIAN
HABITATS ALONG THE RIO GRANDE
LEAD AGENCY
United States Section, International
Boundary and Water Commission,
United States and Mexico (USIBWC).
PROPOSED ACTION
The United States Section, International
Boundary and Water Commission
(USIBWC) proposes to remove the nonnative salt cedar (Tamarix chinensis) on
a 25.85 acre parcel of USIBWC land
along the Rio Grande in Selden Canyon.
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
49458
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2012 / Notices
The proposed action will include
mechanical removal of salt cedar and
follow-up treatments using herbicide.
Two alternatives were discussed in an
environmental assessment made
available to the public during the formal
public review period initiated on
January 19, 2012:
1. Mechanical Removal of salt cedar
with follow-up herbicide
treatments, prescribed burning of
debris and native plant restoration.
(Preferred Alternative).
2. No Action would be taken to
control non-native salt cedar and no
restoration of native plant species
would occur.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
On January 19, 2012 the Draft
Environmental Assessment for removing
salt cedar on the IBWC tract known as
Broad Canyon Arroyo was released for
public review by the USIBWC. Notice of
this document was published in the
Federal Register and made available on
the USIBWC Web site: www.ibwc.gov/
Organization/Environmental/
EIS_EA_Public_Comment.html.
An electronic copy of the draft EA was
also made available through the San
Andres NWR Web site at: https://
www.fws.gov/southwest/refuges/
newmex/sanandres/.
Public review of the draft EA was
completed following a 30 day review
period.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Pursuant to National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) guidance (40 Code of
Federal Regulations 1500–1508), The
President’s Council on Environmental
Quality issued regulations for NEPA
implementation which included
provisions for both the content and
procedural aspects of the required
Environmental Assessment (EA) the
USIBWC has prepared the draft EA.
A careful review of the draft EA
indicates that there will not be a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment as a result of this
proposal. This determination is based
on the following factors:
1. The proposed action will occur in
a localized area belonging to the
International Boundary and Water
Commission and will be of short
duration during part of the year.
The proposed activities are not
national or regional in scope.
2. The proposed action will not
significantly affect public health or
safety. The methods used are
limited in scope, monitored by San
Andres National Wildlife Refuge
staff and occur in areas with no
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Aug 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
public access.
3. The proposed action will not
significantly impact unique
characteristics of the geographic
area such as historical or cultural
resources, park lands, prime
farmlands, wetlands, wild and
scenic rivers, or ecologically critical
areas. The proposed action will
impact the abundance of the nonnative salt cedar on less than 26
acres.
4. The effects of the proposed action
are not considered highly
controversial. The use of
mechanical extraction and followup herbicide treatments as a
management tool to reduce an
exotic species is accepted among
wildlife experts.
5. The possible effects of the proposed
action are not highly uncertain and
do not involve unique or unknown
risks.
6. The proposed action does not
establish a precedent for actions
with future significant effects or
represent a decision in principle
about a future consideration.
7. There are no significant cumulative
effects identified by the EA.
Mechanical extraction of salt cedar
will be limited in scope and time,
will be coordinated with other
management agencies, and will stay
within management objectives.
8. The proposed action will not affect
districts, sites, highways, structures,
or objects listed in or eligible for
listing in the National Register of
Historic Places, nor will it cause a
loss or destruction of significant
scientific, cultural, or historic
resources. The fieldwork conducted
under the proposed action does not
constitute an undertaking as
defined by the National Historic
Preservation Act.
9. The proposed action will fully
comply with the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended.
The proposed action would not
affect non-target federally or state
listed threatened and endangered
species. The proposed action will
likely benefit native wildlife
populations, particularly
neotropical migrant birds by
replacing a monotypic stand of nonnative salt cedar with a diverse
native plant community.
10. The proposed action will result in
the irretrievable loss of some
individual salt cedar. The proposed
action will reduce the amount of
salt cedar on a small parcel in an
area that is made up of salt cedar
along the river for miles in either
direction. Impacts to the statewide
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
population of salt cedar are
determined to be insignificant.
11. The proposed action will not have
any significant adverse effects on
wetlands and floodplains, pursuant
to Executive Orders 11990 and
11988 because the study area is not
located within any wetlands and
the amount of floodplain affected is
minimal.
12. The proposed action will not
threaten a violation of Federal,
State, or local law or requirement
imposed for the protection of the
environment. The proposed action
will be conducted consistent with
any and all requisite approvals or
authorizations of the cooperating
agencies.
On the basis of the information
contained in the environmental
assessment, it is the determination of
the USIBWC that the proposed action
does not constitute a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment under the
meaning of Section 102 (2) (c) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended. Accordingly,
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act and
regulations promulgated by the Council
on Environmental Quality are fulfilled
and an environmental impact statement
is not required.
Edward Drusina
Commissioner
International Boundary and Water
Commission, United States Section
Date: August 8, 2012
[FR Doc. 2012–20016 Filed 8–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7010–01–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–834]
Certain Mobile Electronic Devices
Incorporating Haptics; Amendment of
the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) amending the
complaint and notice of investigation in
the above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49457-49458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20016]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES AND MEXICO
Availability of the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment for Non-native Plant
Control and Re-establishment of Riparian Habitats Along the Rio Grande
in Seldon Canyon, Do[ntilde]a Ana County, NM
AGENCY: United States Section, International Boundary and Water
Commission, United States and Mexico.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Assessment
(EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Final
Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508); and the United States
Section, Operational Procedures for Implementing Section 102 of NEPA,
published in the Federal Register September 2, 1981, (46 FR 44083); the
United States Section hereby gives notice that the Final Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Non-native Plant
Control and Re-establishment of Riparian Habitats Along the Rio Grande
on U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission and Bureau of Land
Management Lands are available. A notice of finding of no significant
impact dated January 24, 2012, provided a thirty (30) day comment
period before making the finding final. The Notice was published in the
Federal Register on January 24, 2012 (Federal Register Notice, Vol. 77,
No. 15, Page 3497).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilbert Anaya, Division Chief,
Environmental Management Division; United States Section, International
Boundary and Water Commission; 4171 N. Mesa, C-100; El Paso, Texas
79902. Telephone: (915) 832-4702, email: Gilbert.Anaya@ibwc.gov.
BACKGROUND: This proposed project will be part of a regional initiative
to restore the form and function of the Rio Grande floodplain that has
been undertaken by other Federal, State, and non government
organizations. The overarching goals of the project are to improve the
ecosystem integrity within the project area by shifting conditions to
match those that historically existed. This project will focus on
restoring 31.35 acres divided between two tracts of federal lands
(25.85 ac USIBWC and 5.5 ac BLM) from saltcedar to native riparian
habitats by utilizing validated mechanical and chemical control methods
to remove and control saltcedar.
Availability: Electronic copies of the Final EA and FONSI are
available from the USIBWC Web site at: https://www.ibwc.gov/Organization/Environmental/reports_studies.html.
Dated: August 3, 2012.
Steven Fitten,
General Counsel.
U.S. INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION EL PASO FIELD OFFICE
TEXAS
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
NON-NATIVE PLANT CONTROL AND RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF RIPARIAN HABITATS
ALONG THE RIO GRANDE
LEAD AGENCY
United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission,
United States and Mexico (USIBWC).
PROPOSED ACTION
The United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission
(USIBWC) proposes to remove the non-native salt cedar (Tamarix
chinensis) on a 25.85 acre parcel of USIBWC land along the Rio Grande
in Selden Canyon.
[[Page 49458]]
The proposed action will include mechanical removal of salt cedar and
follow-up treatments using herbicide.
Two alternatives were discussed in an environmental assessment made
available to the public during the formal public review period
initiated on January 19, 2012:
1. Mechanical Removal of salt cedar with follow-up herbicide
treatments, prescribed burning of debris and native plant restoration.
(Preferred Alternative).
2. No Action would be taken to control non-native salt cedar and no
restoration of native plant species would occur.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
On January 19, 2012 the Draft Environmental Assessment for removing
salt cedar on the IBWC tract known as Broad Canyon Arroyo was released
for public review by the USIBWC. Notice of this document was published
in the Federal Register and made available on the USIBWC Web site:
www.ibwc.gov/Organization/Environmental/EIS_EA_Public_Comment.html.
An electronic copy of the draft EA was also made available through the
San Andres NWR Web site at: https://www.fws.gov/southwest/refuges/newmex/sanandres/.
Public review of the draft EA was completed following a 30 day review
period.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Pursuant to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidance (40 Code
of Federal Regulations 1500-1508), The President's Council on
Environmental Quality issued regulations for NEPA implementation which
included provisions for both the content and procedural aspects of the
required Environmental Assessment (EA) the USIBWC has prepared the
draft EA.
A careful review of the draft EA indicates that there will not be a
significant impact on the quality of the human environment as a result
of this proposal. This determination is based on the following factors:
1. The proposed action will occur in a localized area belonging to
the International Boundary and Water Commission and will be of short
duration during part of the year. The proposed activities are not
national or regional in scope.
2. The proposed action will not significantly affect public health
or safety. The methods used are limited in scope, monitored by San
Andres National Wildlife Refuge staff and occur in areas with no public
access.
3. The proposed action will not significantly impact unique
characteristics of the geographic area such as historical or cultural
resources, park lands, prime farmlands, wetlands, wild and scenic
rivers, or ecologically critical areas. The proposed action will impact
the abundance of the non-native salt cedar on less than 26 acres.
4. The effects of the proposed action are not considered highly
controversial. The use of mechanical extraction and follow-up herbicide
treatments as a management tool to reduce an exotic species is accepted
among wildlife experts.
5. The possible effects of the proposed action are not highly
uncertain and do not involve unique or unknown risks.
6. The proposed action does not establish a precedent for actions
with future significant effects or represent a decision in principle
about a future consideration.
7. There are no significant cumulative effects identified by the
EA. Mechanical extraction of salt cedar will be limited in scope and
time, will be coordinated with other management agencies, and will stay
within management objectives.
8. The proposed action will not affect districts, sites, highways,
structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places, nor will it cause a loss or
destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historic resources.
The fieldwork conducted under the proposed action does not constitute
an undertaking as defined by the National Historic Preservation Act.
9. The proposed action will fully comply with the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. The proposed action would not affect
non-target federally or state listed threatened and endangered species.
The proposed action will likely benefit native wildlife populations,
particularly neotropical migrant birds by replacing a monotypic stand
of non-native salt cedar with a diverse native plant community.
10. The proposed action will result in the irretrievable loss of
some individual salt cedar. The proposed action will reduce the amount
of salt cedar on a small parcel in an area that is made up of salt
cedar along the river for miles in either direction. Impacts to the
statewide population of salt cedar are determined to be insignificant.
11. The proposed action will not have any significant adverse
effects on wetlands and floodplains, pursuant to Executive Orders 11990
and 11988 because the study area is not located within any wetlands and
the amount of floodplain affected is minimal.
12. The proposed action will not threaten a violation of Federal,
State, or local law or requirement imposed for the protection of the
environment. The proposed action will be conducted consistent with any
and all requisite approvals or authorizations of the cooperating
agencies.
On the basis of the information contained in the environmental
assessment, it is the determination of the USIBWC that the proposed
action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment under the meaning of
Section 102 (2) (c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
as amended. Accordingly, requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act and regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental
Quality are fulfilled and an environmental impact statement is not
required.
Edward Drusina
Commissioner
International Boundary and Water Commission, United States Section
Date: August 8, 2012
[FR Doc. 2012-20016 Filed 8-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7010-01-P