Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned Jordan Cove Liquefaction and Pacific Connector Pipeline Projects, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings, 48138-48145 [2012-19781]
Download as PDF
48138
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Take notice that on August 6, 2012,
OREG 1, Inc., OREG 2, Inc., OREG 3,
Inc., and OREG 4, Inc. submitted a
supplement to the compliance refund
reports filed on March 19, 2012,
pursuant to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission’s (Commission)
Orders issued in this proceeding on May
19, 2011, 135 FERC ¶ 61,150 (2011), and
February 16, 2012, 138 FERC ¶ 61,110
(2012).
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all the parties in this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on August 27, 2012.
Dated: August 7, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19757 Filed 8–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. EG12–63–000; EG12–64–000;
EG12–65–000; EG12–66–000; EG12–67–000;
EG12–68–000; EG12–69–000]
Topaz Solar Farms LLC; High Plains
Ranch II, LLC; Bethel Wind Energy
LLC; Rippey Wind Energy LLC; Pacific
Wind, LLC; Colorado Highlands Wind,
LLC; Shooting Star Wind Project, LLC;
Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt
Wholesale Generator or Foreign Utility
Company Status
Take notice that during the month of
May 2012, the status of the abovecaptioned entities as Exempt Wholesale
Generators became effective by
operation of the Commission’s
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a).
Dated: August 6, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19780 Filed 8–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Jordan Cove Energy Project LP—Docket
No. PF12–7–000: Pacific Connector Gas
Pipeline LP—Docket No. PF12–17–000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Planned Jordan Cove Liquefaction
and Pacific Connector Pipeline
Projects, Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Public Scoping Meetings
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission), in cooperation with other
federal agencies, will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
that will discuss the environmental
Monday, August 27, 2012, 6:30 p.m.
Southwestern Oregon Community College, Hales Performing Arts Center, 1988 Newmark Ave., Coos Bay, OR 97420, 541–888–2525
impacts of Jordan Cove Energy Project
LP’s (Jordan Cove) proposed
liquefaction project in Coos County,
Oregon, and Pacific Connector Gas
Pipeline LP’s (Pacific Connector)
proposed pipeline project crossing
portions of Klamath, Jackson, Douglas,
and Coos Counties, Oregon. The FERC
is the lead federal agency in the
preparation of an EIS to satisfy the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
United States (U.S.) Army Corps of
Engineers (COE), U.S. Department of
Energy Office of Fossil Energy (DOE),
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest
Service (Forest Service), and the U.S.
Department of the Interior Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), Bureau of
Reclamation (Reclamation), and Fish
and Wildlife Service are cooperating
agencies assisting the FERC in
preparation of the EIS.
The Commission will use this EIS in
its decision-making process, to
determine whether the Jordan Cove
liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal is
in the public interest, and whether the
Pacific Connector pipeline is in the
public convenience and necessity, in
accordance with the Natural Gas Act
(NGA). The BLM and Forest Service
propose to adopt the FERC EIS in
accordance with Title 40 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 1506.3 to
support decisions and findings that
must be made by each agency with
respect to the Pacific Connector pipeline
project.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission,
Forest Service, BLM, and Reclamation
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the planned
projects. Your input will help the
Commission staff determine what issues
should be evaluated in the EIS. Please
note that the scoping period will close
on September 4, 2012.
You may submit comments in written
form or verbally. Further details on how
to submit written comments are in the
Public Participation section of this
notice. In lieu of or in addition to
sending in written comments, the
Commission invites you to make verbal
comments 1 at the public scoping
meetings scheduled as follows:
Tuesday, August 28, 2012, 6:30 p.m.
Umpqua Community College, Campus Center Dining Room, 1140
Umpqua College Rd., Roseburg, OR 97470, 541–440–4600
1 Verbal comments at the public scoping meetings
will be transcribed by a court reporter and placed
into the public record for these proceedings.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
Wednesday, August 29, 2012, 6:30 p.m.
Oregon Institute of Technology, College Union Auditorium, 3201 Campus Dr., Klamath Falls, OR 97601, 541–885–1030
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for these projects. State and
local government representatives should
notify their constituents about these
projects and this scoping effort, and
encourage interested members of the
public to comment on their areas of
concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, a Pacific Connector
representative may contact you about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
planned facilities. The company would
seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the Pacific Connector pipeline
project, that approval conveys with it
the right of eminent domain. Therefore,
if easement negotiations fail to produce
an agreement, the pipeline company
could initiate condemnation
proceedings where compensation would
be determined in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This
fact sheet addresses a number of
typically-asked questions, including the
use of eminent domain and how to
participate in the Commission’s
proceedings.
Background
On December 17, 2009, the
Commission issued an Order
authorizing the Jordan Cove LNG import
terminal in Docket No. CP07–444–000
and Pacific Connector pipeline in
Docket No. CP07–441–000. The
Commission vacated those
authorizations in an Order issued April
16, 2012, after Jordan Cove submitted its
request to begin the pre-filing process to
change the facility’s purpose from an
LNG import terminal to an export
terminal.
The FERC staff and cooperating
agencies produced an EIS for the
previous projects in May 2009. The new
EIS for the currently proposed projects
will make use of the previous analyses,
update information, as needed, and
evaluate the impacts associated with the
new or modified facilities and routes.
Summary of the Planned Projects
Jordan Cove proposes to construct and
operate an LNG export terminal on the
North Spit of Coos Bay. The terminal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Thursday, August 30, 2012, 6:30 p.m.
Medford School District, Education Center Auditorium, 815 S. Oakdale
Ave., Medford, OR 97501, 541–842–3636.
would have the capacity to produce
about six million metric tons per annum
(MMTPA) of LNG (equivalent to 0.9
billion cubic feet per day [Bcf/d] of
natural gas). Facilities would include:
• 7.3-mile-long waterway in Coos Bay
for about 80 LNG carriers per year;
• 0.3-mile-long access channel and
marine berth;
• A cryogenic transfer pipeline;
• Two 160,000 cubic meter LNG
storage tanks;
• Four liquefaction trains (each with
a capacity of 1.5 MMTPA);
• two feed gas and dehydration trains
with a combined throughput of 1 Bcf/d
of natural gas; and
• a 350 megawatt South Dunes power
plant.
The Pacific Connector pipeline would
be 36-inches-in-diameter and about 230miles-long, extending from
interconnections with other interstate
pipelines near Malin, Oregon to the
Jordan Cove LNG terminal at Coos Bay.
The pipeline would have a design
capacity of 0.9 Bcf/d of natural gas.
Related facilities include:
• Two meter stations at the
interconnections with the existing Gas
Transmission Northwest (GTN) and
Ruby pipelines near Malin, in Klamath
County, Oregon;
• A 23,000-horsepower compressor
station adjacent to the GTN and Ruby
meter stations;
• A meter station at the
interconnection with the existing
Williams Northwest Pipeline system
near Myrtle Creek, in Douglas County,
Oregon; and
• A meter station at the Jordan Cove
terminal, in Coos County, Oregon.
The general location of the project
facilities is shown in Appendix 1.2
Land Requirements for Construction
The newly proposed Jordan Cove LNG
export terminal in PF12–7–000 occupies
the same footprint that was analyzed in
our 3 May 2009 EIS, with the addition of
the South Dunes power plant at the
location of the previously proposed
2 The appendices referenced in this notice will
not appear in the Federal Register. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ‘‘eLibrary’’ or from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call (202)
502–8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
3 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the
environmental staff of the Commission’s Office of
Energy Projects.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
48139
Sfmt 4703
dredged material placement area.
Likewise, the Pacific Connector pipeline
as proposed in Docket PF12–17–000
basically follows the route that was
previously analyzed, with a few minor
adjustments, and the relocation of the
compressor station to the east end of the
project.
As presented in our May 2009 EIS,
construction of the Jordan Cove’s LNG
terminal would affect about 390 acres
onshore, with an additional 72 acres
needed to construct the marine berth
and access channel for the LNG ships in
Coos Bay. Construction of the Pacific
Connector pipeline would affect a total
of about 6,217 acres. The permanent
operational easement for the pipeline
right-of-way (ROW) and aboveground
facilities would occupy about 1,439
acres.
The EIS Scoping Process
The NEPA requires the Commission
to take into account the environmental
impacts that could result from an action
whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity, or makes a public interest
determination. The NEPA also requires
us to discover and address concerns the
public may have about proposals. This
process is referred to as scoping. The
main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EIS on the
important environmental issues. By this
notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to
be addressed in the EIS. We will
consider all filed comments during the
preparation of the EIS.
In the EIS we will discuss impacts
that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the
planned projects under these general
headings:
• Land use;
• Geology and soils;
• Water resources and wetlands;
• Vegetation and wildlife;
• Cultural resources;
• Recreation and visual resources;
• Air quality and noise; and
• Public safety.
We will also evaluate possible
alternatives to the planned projects or
portions of the projects, and make
recommendations on how to lessen or
avoid impacts on the various
environmental resources. The EIS will
present our independent analysis of the
issues.
Although no formal applications have
been filed yet, we have already initiated
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
48140
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
our NEPA review under the
Commission’s pre-filing process. The
purpose of the pre-filing process is to
encourage early involvement of
interested stakeholders, and to identify
and resolve issues before the FERC
receives an application. As part of our
pre-filing review, we have begun to
contact some federal and state agencies
to discuss their involvement in the
scoping process and the preparation of
the EIS.
The COE, DOE, Forest Service, BLM,
and Reclamation also have
responsibilities under the NEPA, and
can adopt the EIS for their own agencies
purposes. The BLM, Reclamation, and
Forest Service will use this EIS to
evaluate the effects of the Pacific
Connector pipeline project on lands and
facilities managed by these agencies.
The BLM and Forest Service will also
use the EIS to address proposed
amendments of their respective land
management plans 4 that may be
necessary to make provision for the
project.
With this notice, we are asking other
agencies with jurisdiction by law and/
or special expertise with respect to the
environmental issues related to the
projects to formally cooperate with us in
the preparation of the EIS.5 Agencies
that would like to request cooperating
agency status should follow the
instructions for filing comments
provided under the Public Participation
section of this notice.
We will publish and distribute a draft
EIS for public comment. After the
comment period, we will consider all
timely comments and revise the
document, as necessary, before issuing a
final EIS. To ensure we have the
opportunity to consider and address
your comments, please carefully follow
the instructions in the Public
Participation section of this notice.
Consultations Under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation’s
implementing regulations for section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA), we are using
this notice to initiate consultations with
the Oregon State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO), and to solicit its views,
and those of other government agencies,
4 BLM land management plans are called
‘‘Resource Management Plans’’ or RMPs. Forest
Service land management plans are called ‘‘Land
and Resource Management Plans’’ or LRMPs. The
term ‘‘land management plan’’ is generic and may
apply to either an RMP or LRMP.
5 The Council on Environmental Quality
regulations addressing cooperating agency
responsibilities are at 40 CFR 1501.6.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
interested Indian tribes, and the public
on the projects’ potential effects on
historic properties.6 The EIS will define
the project-specific area of potential
effects (APE), determined in
consultation with the SHPO. On natural
gas projects, the APE at a minimum
encompasses all areas subject to ground
disturbance (including the construction
ROW, temporary extra workspaces,
contractor/pipe storage yards,
compressor stations and other
aboveground facilities, and access
roads). The EIS will document our
findings on the projects’ potential
impacts on historic properties and
summarize the status of consultations
under section 106. The cooperating
agencies will also participate in the
section 106 consultation process to
ensure that their requirements under the
NHPA are met.7
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
The purpose of the public scoping
process is to determine relevant issues
that will influence the scope of the
environmental analysis, including
alternatives. Scoping also allows the
public to comment on the BLM and
Forest Service plan amendment process,
and the consideration of a ROW Grant.
Based in part on our previous
environmental analysis, information
provided by Jordan Cove and Pacific
Connector for their new proposals, and
input from other federal and state
resource agencies, and other
stakeholders, we have already identified
several issues that we think deserve
attention during our current review.
This preliminary list of environmental
issues may change based on your
comments and our further analysis. The
FERC staff identified the following
preliminary list of issues:
• Reliability and safety for LNG
carrier traffic in Coos Bay, the LNG
terminal, and the pipeline;
• Impacts on aquatic resources from
dredging the LNG terminal access
channel and berth, and pipeline
trenching in Coos Bay;
• Geological hazards to the LNG
terminal from seismic activity;
6 The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
regulations are at 36 CFR part 800. Those
regulations define historic properties as any
prehistoric or historic district, site, building,
structure, or object included in or eligible for
inclusion in the National Register for Historic
Places.
7 We and the federal land managing agencies
previously executed a Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) to resolve adverse effects at historic
properties for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal and
Pacific Connector pipeline in Docket Nos. CP07–
441–000 and CP07–444–000. The MOA will be
amended for the new proposals under Docket Nos.
PF12–7–000 and PF12–17–000.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Geological hazards, including
landslides at steep slopes, along the
pipeline route;
• Impacts of pipeline construction on
federally listed threatened and
endangered species, including salmon,
marbled murrelet, and northern spotted
owl;
• Impacts of pipeline construction on
private landowners; and
• Visual impacts resulting from
construction and operation of the
projects.
Preliminary issues for the plan
amendments have been identified by
BLM and Forest Service staff. The issues
include:
• Effects of proposed amendments on
Survey and Manage species and their
habitat;
• Effects of proposed amendments on
contiguous existing or recruitment
habitat for marbled murrelets within 0.5
mile of occupied marbled murrelet sites;
• Effects of proposed amendments on
habitat in Known Owl Activity Centers
(KOAC); and
• Effects of the proposed amendments
on Late Successional Reserves (LSR).
Preliminary BLM and Forest Service
planning criteria include:
• Evaluation of significance of
proposed amendments of Forest Service
Land and Resource Management Plans
(LRMP) in the context of goals and
objectives of the affected LRMPs.
Whether a plan amendment is
significant is guided by several factors,
including the timing and duration of the
proposed change, the location and size
of the project, and how the proposed
change could alter multiple-use goals
and objectives for long-term land and
resource management;
• Likelihood of persistence of affected
Survey and Manage species within the
range of the northern spotted owl;
• Amount and quality of marbled
murrelet habitat affected by
construction and operation of the
Pacific Connector pipeline project;
• Amount and quality of habitat in
KOAC affected by construction and
operation of the Pacific Connector
pipeline project;
• Functionality of LSR; and
• Impacts on Connectivity and
Diversity Blocks on BLM lands.
The BLM and Forest Service seek
public input on issues and planning
criteria related to amendment of their
District and Forest land management
plans related to the Pacific Connector
pipeline project. The BLM, Reclamation,
and Forest Service also seek public
input on issues and planning criteria
related to issuance of the ROW Grant, as
discussed below (under Proposed
Actions of the BLM and Forest Service).
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
Proposed Actions of the DOE
The DOE must meet its obligation
under section 3 of the NGA, to authorize
the import and export of natural gas,
including LNG, unless it finds that the
proposed import or export will not be
consistent with the public interest. The
purpose and need for DOE actions is to
respond to the application filed by
Jordan Cove with the DOE on March 23,
2012 (FE Docket No. 12–32–LNG),
seeking authorization to export up to 6
MMTPA of LNG, an export volume
equivalent to about 292 Bcf per year of
natural gas, for a 25-year period,
commencing the earlier of the date of
first export or seven years from the date
of issuance of the requested
authorization. The LNG proposed for
export would be from Jordan Cove’s
proposed Coos Bay terminal to any
country: (1) With which the U.S. does
not have a free trade agreement
requiring the national treatment for
trade in natural gas; (2) that has, or in
the future develops, the capacity to
import LNG; and (3) with which trade
is not prohibited by U.S. law or policy.
Because the proposed projects may
involve actions in floodplains, in
accordance with 10 CFR part 1022,
Compliance with Floodplain and
Wetland Environmental Review
Requirements, the EIS will include a
floodplain assessment, as appropriate. A
floodplain statement of findings will be
included in any DOE determinations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Actions of the BLM and
Forest Service
The purpose of and need for the
proposed action by the BLM is to
respond to a ROW Grant application
originally submitted by Pacific
Connector on April 17, 2006 to
construct, operate, maintain, and
eventually decommission a natural gas
pipeline that crosses lands and facilities
administered by the BLM, Reclamation,
and Forest Service. In addition, there is
a need for the BLM and the Forest
Service to consider amending affected
District and Forest land management
plans to make provision for the Pacific
Connector ROW.
The proposed action of the BLM and
Forest Service has two components.
First, the BLM would amend its
Resource Management Plans (RMP) for
the Coos Bay, Roseburg, and Medford
Districts, and Klamath Falls Resource
Area of the Lakeview District; while the
Forest Service would amend its LRMPs
for the Umpqua, Rogue River, and
Winema National Forests to make
provisions for the Pacific Connector
pipeline project. Reclamation has no
land use plan amendments associated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
with this action. Second, in accordance
with 43 CFR 2882.3(i), the BLM would
issue a ROW Grant in response to
Pacific Connector’s application for the
project to occupy federal lands, with the
written concurrence of the Forest
Service and Reclamation. Each agency
may submit specific stipulations,
including mitigation measures, for
inclusion in the ROW Grant related to
lands, facilities, and easements within
their respective jurisdictions.
The Secretary of the Interior has
delegated authority to the BLM to grant
a ROW in response to Pacific
Connector’s application for natural gas
transmission on federal lands under the
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. The
Responsible Official for amendments of
BLM RMPs and issuance of the ROW
Grant is the BLM Oregon/Washington
State Director. The Responsible Official
for amendment of Forest Service LRMPs
is the Forest Supervisor of the Umpqua
National Forest. The Responsible
Official for concurrence on issuance of
the ROW Grant by Reclamation is the
Area Manager of the Mid-Pacific
Region’s Klamath Basin Area Office. In
accordance with 36 CFR 219.17(b)(2),
the Deciding Official for the Forest
Service has elected to use the 1982
planning rule procedures to amend
Forest Service LRMPs as provided in the
transition procedures of the 2000
planning rule.
If the BLM adopts the new FERC EIS
for the Pacific Connector pipeline
project (in Docket No. PF12–17–000),
the Oregon/Washington State Director of
the BLM will make the following
decisions and determinations:
• Determine whether to amend the
RMPs for the BLM Coos Bay, Roseburg,
and Medford Districts and the Klamath
Falls Resource Area of the Lakeview
District as proposed or as described in
an alternative to the Proposed Action;
and
• Respond to the Pacific Connector
application, with concurrence of
Reclamation and Forest Service, by
issuing a ROW Grant, granting the ROW
with conditions, or denying the
application.
If the Forest Service adopts the new
FERC EIS for the Pacific Connector
pipeline project (in Docket No. PF12–
17–000), the Forest Supervisor of the
Umpqua National Forest will make the
following decisions and determinations:
• Decide whether to amend the
LRMPs of the Umpqua, Rogue River,
and Winema National Forests as
proposed or as described in an
alternative; and
• Determine the significance of the
proposed amendments or alternatives in
accordance with national forest
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48141
planning regulation 36 CFR 219.10(f)
(1982 procedures) using criteria in
Forest Service Manual 1926.5
Amendment of BLM and Forest Service
Land Management Plans
BLM/FS–1—Site-Specific Waiver of
Management Recommendations for
Survey and Manage Species on the BLM
Coos Bay District, Roseburg District,
Medford District, and Klamath Falls
Resource Area of the Lakeview District
RMPs, and the Umpqua National Forest,
Rogue River National Forest, and
Winema National Forest LRMPs
Applicable BLM District RMPs and
National Forest LRMPs would be
amended to exempt certain known sites
within the area of the proposed Pacific
Connector ROW Grant from the
Management Recommendations
required by the 2001 ‘‘Record of
Decision and Standards and Guidelines
for Amendments to the Survey and
Manage, Protection Buffer, and other
Mitigation Measures Standards and
Guidelines,’’ as modified in July 2011.
For known sites within the proposed
ROW that cannot be avoided, the 2001
Management Recommendations for
protection of known sites of Survey and
Manage species would not apply. For
known sites located outside the
proposed ROW but with an overlapping
protection buffer only that portion of the
buffer within the ROW would be
exempt from the protection
requirements of the Management
Recommendations. Those Management
Recommendations would remain in
effect for that portion of the protection
buffer that is outside of the ROW. The
proposed amendment would not exempt
the BLM or the Forest Service from the
requirements of the 2001 Survey and
Manage Record of Decision, as
modified, to maintain species
persistence for affected Survey and
Manage species within the range of the
northern spotted owl. This is a sitespecific amendment applicable only to
the Pacific Connector ROW and would
not change future management direction
at any other location.
Amendments of BLM RMPs
BLM–1—Site-Specific Exemption of
Requirement To Protect Marbled
Murrelet Habitat on the BLM Coos Bay
and Roseburg Districts
The Coos Bay District and Roseburg
District RMPs would be amended to
waive the requirements to protect
contiguous existing and recruitment
habitat for marbled murrelets within the
Pacific Connector ROW that is within
0.5 miles of occupied marbled murrelet
sites, as mapped by the BLM. This is a
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
48142
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
site-specific amendment applicable only
to the Pacific Connector ROW and
would not change future management
direction at any other location.
BLM–2—Site Specific Exemption of
Requirement To Retain Habitat in KOAC
on the BLM Roseburg District
The Roseburg District RMP would be
amended to exempt the Pacific
Connector pipeline project from the
requirement to retain habitat in KOAC
at three locations. This is a site-specific
amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not
change future management direction at
any other location.
BLM–3—Reallocation of Matrix Lands
to LSR, Roseburg District
The Roseburg District RMP would be
amended to change the designation of
approximately 409 acres from Matrix
land allocations to the LSR land
allocation in Sections 32 and 34,
Township (T.) 291⁄2 South (S.), Range
(R.) 7 West (W.); and Section 1, T.30S.,
R.7W.,Willamette Meridian (W.M.),
Oregon (OR). This change in land
allocation is proposed to mitigate the
potential adverse impact of the Pacific
Connector pipeline project on LSRs in
the Roseburg District. The amendment
would change future management
direction for the lands reallocated from
Matrix lands to LSR.
BLM–4—Reallocation of Matrix Lands
to LSR, Coos Bay District
The Coos Bay District RMP would be
amended to change the designation of
approximately 454 acres from Matrix
land allocations to the LSR land
allocation in Sections 19 and 29 of
T.28S., R.10W., W.M., OR. This change
in land allocation is proposed to
mitigate the potential adverse impact of
the Pacific Connector pipeline project
on LSRs in the Coos Bay District. The
amendment would change future
management direction for the lands
reallocated from Matrix lands to LSR.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Amendment of the Umpqua National
Forest LRMP
UNF–1—Site-Specific Amendment To
Allow Removal of Effective Shade on
Perennial Streams
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP
would be amended to change the
Standards and Guidelines for Fisheries
(Umpqua National Forest LRMP, page
IV–33, Forest-Wide) to allow the
removal of effective shading vegetation
where perennial streams are crossed by
the Pacific Connector ROW. This change
would potentially affect an estimated
total of three acres of effective shading
vegetation at approximately five
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
perennial stream crossings in the East
Fork of Cow Creek subwatershed from
pipeline mileposts (MP) 109 to 110 in
Sections 16 and 21, T.32S., R.2W.,
W.M., OR. This is a site-specific
amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not
change future management direction at
any other location.
UNF–2—Site-Specific Amendment To
Allow Utility Corridors in Riparian
Areas
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP
would be amended to change
prescriptions C2–II (LRMP IV–173) and
C2–IV (LRMP IV–177) to allow the
Pacific Connector pipeline route to run
parallel to the East Fork of Cow Creek
for approximately 0.1 mile between
about pipeline MPs 109.5 and 109.6 in
Section 21, T.32S., R.2W., W. M., OR.
This change would potentially affect
approximately one acre of riparian
vegetation along the East Fork of Cow
Creek. This is a site-specific amendment
applicable only to the Pacific Connector
ROW and would not change future
management direction at any other
location.
UNF–3—Site-Specific Amendment To
Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector
ROW in All Management Areas
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP
would be amended to waive limitations
on the area affected by detrimental soil
conditions from displacement and
compaction within the Pacific
Connector ROW. Standards and
Guidelines for Soils (LRMP page IV–67)
requires that not more than 20 percent
of the project area have detrimental
compaction, displacement, or puddling
after completion of a project. This is a
site-specific amendment applicable only
to the Pacific Connector ROW and
would not change future management
direction at any other location.
UNF–4—Reallocation of Matrix Lands
to LSR
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP
would be amended to change the
designation of approximately 588 acres
from Matrix land allocations to the LSR
land allocation in Sections 7, 18, and
19, T.32S., R.2W.; and Sections 13 and
24, T.32S., R.3W., W.M., OR. This
change in land allocation is proposed to
partially mitigate the potential adverse
impact of the Pacific Connector pipeline
project on LSR 223 on the Umpqua
National Forest. This amendment would
change future management direction for
the lands reallocated from Matrix to
LSR.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Amendment of the Rogue River National
Forest LRMP
RRNF–1—Amendment To Provide for
Energy Transmission
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to establish a
Forest Plan objective that states: ‘‘While
considering other multiple use values,
the Forest shall facilitate and make
provision for energy transmission via
the Pacific Connector consistent with
the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the
Mineral Leasing Act, the Natural Gas
Act, the Multiple Use Sustained Yield
Act, and the National Forest
Management Act.’’
RRNF–2—Site-Specific Amendment of
Visual Quality Objectives (VQO) on the
Big Elk Road
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to change the
VQO where the Pacific Connector
pipeline route crosses the Big Elk Road
at about pipeline MP 161.4 in Section
16, T.37S., R.4E., W.M., OR, from
Foreground Retention (Management
Strategy 6, LRMP page 4–72) to
Foreground Partial Retention
(Management Strategy 7, LRMP page 4–
86) and allow 10–15 years for amended
VQO to be attained. The existing
Standards and Guidelines for VQO in
Foreground Retention where the Pacific
Connector pipeline route crosses the Big
Elk Road require that VQOs be met
within one year of completion of the
project and that management activities
not be visually evident. This
amendment would apply only to the
Pacific Connector pipeline project in the
vicinity of Big Elk Road and would not
change future management direction for
any other project.
RRNF–3—Site-Specific Amendment of
VQO on the Pacific Crest Trail
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to change the
VQO where the Pacific Connector
pipeline route crosses the Pacific Crest
Trail at about pipeline MP 168 in
Section 32, T.37S., R.5E., W.M., OR,
from Foreground Partial Retention
(Management Strategy 7, LRMP page 4–
86) to Modification (USDA Forest
Service Agricultural Handbook 478) and
to allow 15–20 years for amended VQOs
to be attained. The existing Standards
and Guidelines for VQOs in Foreground
Partial Retention in the area where the
Pacific Connector pipeline route crosses
the Pacific Crest Trail require that visual
mitigation measures meet the stated
VQO within three years of the
completion of the project and that
management activities be visually
subordinate to the landscape. This
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
amendment would apply only to the
Pacific Connector pipeline project in the
vicinity of the Pacific Crest Trail and
would not change future management
direction for any other project.
RRNF–4—Site-Specific Amendment of
Visual Quality Objectives Adjacent to
Highway 140
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to allow 10–
15 years to meet the VQO of
Middleground Partial Retention
between Pacific Connector pipeline MPs
156.3 to 156.8 and 157.2 to 157.5 in
Sections 11 and 12, T.37S., R.3E., W.M.,
OR. Standards and Guidelines for
Middleground Partial Retention
(Management Strategy 9, LRMP Page 4–
112) require that VQOs for a given
location be achieved within three years
of completion of the project.
Approximately 0.8 miles or 9 acres of
the Pacific Connector ROW in the
Middleground Partial Retention VQO
visible at distances of 0.75 to 5 miles
from State Highway 140 would be
affected by this amendment. This
amendment would apply only to the
Pacific Connector pipeline project in
Sections 11 and 12, T.37S., R.3E., W.M.,
OR, and would not change future
management direction for any other
project.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
RRNF–5—Site-Specific Amendment To
Allow Utility Transmission Corridors in
Management Strategy 26, Restricted
Riparian Areas
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to allow the
Pacific Connector ROW to cross the
Restricted Riparian land allocation. This
would potentially affect approximately
2.5 acres of the Restricted Riparian
Management Strategy at one perennial
stream crossing on the South Fork of
Little Butte Creek at about pipeline MP
162.45 in Section 15, T.37S., R.4E.,
W.M., OR. Standards and Guidelines for
the Restricted Riparian land allocation
prescribe locating transmission
corridors outside of this land allocation
(Management Strategy 26, LRMP page
4–308,). This is a site-specific
amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not
change future management direction at
any other location.
RRNF–6—Site-Specific Amendment To
Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector
ROW in All Management Areas
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to waive
limitations on areas affected by
detrimental soil conditions from
displacement and compaction within
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
the Pacific Connector ROW in all
affected Management Strategies.
Standards and Guidelines for
detrimental soil impacts in affected
Management Strategies require that no
more than 10 percent of an activity area
should be compacted, puddled or
displaced upon completion of project
(not including permanent roads or
landings). No more than 20 percent of
the area should be displaced or
compacted under circumstances
resulting from previous management
practices including roads and landings.
Permanent recreation facilities or other
permanent facilities are exempt (RRNF
LRMP 4–41, 4–83, 4–97, 4–123, 4–177,
4–307). This is a site-specific
amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not
change future management direction at
any other location.
RRNF–7—Reallocation of Matrix Lands
to LSR
The Rogue River National Forest
LRMP would be amended to change the
designation of approximately 512 acres
from Matrix land allocations to the LSR
land allocation in Section 32, T.36S.,
R.4E. W.M., OR. This change in land
allocation is proposed to partially
mitigate the potential adverse impact of
the Pacific Connector pipeline project
on LSR 227 on the Rogue River National
Forest. This amendment would change
future management direction for the
lands reallocated from Matrix to LSR.
Amendment of the Winema National
Forest LRMP
WNF–1—Site-Specific Amendment To
Allow Utility Corridors in Management
Area 3
The Winema National Forest LRMP
would be amended to change the
Standards and Guidelines for
Management Area 3 (MA–3) (LRMP
page 4–103–4, Lands) to allow the 95foot-wide Pacific Connector pipeline
corridor in MA–3 from the Forest
Boundary in Section 32, T.37S., R.5E.,
W.M., OR, to the Clover Creek Road
corridor in Section 4, T.38S, R.5. E.,
W.M., OR. Standards and Guidelines for
MA–3 state that the area is currently an
avoidance area for new utility corridors.
This proposed new utility corridor is
approximately 1.5 miles long and
occupies approximately 17 acres. This is
a site-specific amendment applicable
only to the Pacific Connector ROW and
would not change future management
direction at any other location.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48143
WNF–2—Site-Specific Amendment of
VQO on the Dead Indian Memorial
Highway
The Winema National Forest LRMP
would be amended to allow 10–15 years
to achieve the VQO of Foreground
Retention where the Pacific Connector
ROW crosses the Dead Indian Memorial
Highway at approximately pipeline MP
168.8 in Section 33, T.37S., R.5E., W.
M., OR. Standards and Guidelines for
Scenic Management, Foreground
Retention (LRMP 4–103, MA 3A,
Foreground Retention) requires VQOs
for a given location be achieved within
one year of completion of the project.
The Forest Service proposes to allow
10–15 years to meet the specified VQO
at this location. This is a site-specific
amendment that would apply only to
the Pacific Connector pipeline project in
the vicinity of the Dead Indian
Memorial Highway and would not
change future management direction for
any other project.
WNF–3—Site-Specific Amendment of
VQO Adjacent to the Clover Creek Road
The Winema National Forest LRMP
would be amended to allow 10–15 years
to meet the VQO for Scenic
Management, Foreground Partial
Retention, where the Pacific Connector
Right-of-Way is adjacent to the Clover
Creek Road from approximately
pipeline MP 170 to 175 in Sections 2,
3, 4, 11, and 12, T.38S., R.5E., and
Sections 7 and 18, T.38S., R.6E., W.M.,
OR. This change would potentially
affect approximately 50 acres. Standards
and Guidelines for Foreground Partial
Retention (LRMP, page 4–107, MA 3B)
require that VQOs be met within three
years of completion of a project. This is
a site-specific amendment would apply
only to the Pacific Connector pipeline
project in the vicinity of Clover Creek
Road and would not change future
management direction for any other
project.
WNF–4—Site-Specific Amendment To
Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector
ROW in All Management Areas
The Winema National Forest LRMP
would be amended to waive restrictions
on detrimental soil conditions from
displacement and compaction within
the Pacific Connector ROW in all
affected management areas. Standards
and Guidelines for detrimental soil
impacts in all affected management
areas require that no more than 20
percent of the activity area be
detrimentally compacted, puddled, or
displaced upon completion of a project
(LRMP page 4–73, 12–5). This is a site-
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
48144
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
specific amendment applicable only to
the Pacific Connector ROW and would
not change future management direction
at any other location.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
WNF–5—Site-Specific Amendment To
Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector
ROW in Management Area 8
The Winema National Forest LRMP
would be amended to waive restrictions
on detrimental soil conditions from
displacement and compaction within
the Pacific Connector ROW within the
Management Area 8, Riparian Area
(MA–8). This change would potentially
affect approximately 0.5 mile or an
estimated 9.6 acres of MA–8. Standards
and Guidelines for Soil and Water, MA–
8 require that not more than 10 percent
of the total riparian zone in an activity
area be in a detrimental soil condition
upon the completion of a project (LRMP
page 4–137, 2). This is a site-specific
amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not
change future management direction at
any other location.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Jordan
Cove and Pacific Connector projects,
and proposed BLM and Forest Service
land management plan amendments.
Your comments should focus on the
potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to
avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more specific your comments, the
more useful they will be. To ensure that
your comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send your comments so
that the Commission receives them in
Washington DC on or before September
4, 2012.
The BLM, Reclamation, and Forest
Service are participating as cooperating
agencies with the FERC in this public
scoping process. With this notice, the
BLM is requesting comments through
the FERC’s public scoping process on
proposed amendments of BLM RMPs to
make provision for the Pacific
Connector ROW on the Coos Bay,
Roseburg, and Medford Districts and
Klamath Falls Resource Area of the
Lakeview District. The BLM is also
requesting public comments on the
issuance of the ROW Grant that would
allow the Pacific Connector pipeline to
occupy federal land. The Forest Service
is requesting public comments on the
proposed amendments of Forest Service
LRMPs to make provision for the Pacific
Connector ROW on the Rogue River,
Umpqua, and Winema National Forests.
Timely comments submitted by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
public in response to the NOI
previously issued by the Forest Service
to make provision for the Pacific
Connector ROW, published in the
Federal Register on June 15, 2009 (Vol.
74, No. 113, pages 27214–28217), will
be considered in this scoping process if
they are applicable to the current Forest
Service proposal. Reclamation has no
proposed land management plan
amendments, but will consider
comments related to the ROW Grant on
Reclamation-administered lands and
facilities.
Comments on actions by the BLM,
Reclamation, or Forest Service should
be submitted through the FERC
comment process and within the
timeline described. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect
a reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative or judicial
review of BLM and Forest Service
decisions. Comments concerning BLM
and Forest Service actions submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however such anonymous
submittals would not provide the
commenters with standing to participate
in administrative or judicial review of
BLM and Forest Service decisions.
For your convenience, there are three
methods you can use to submit your
comments to the FERC. In all instances,
please reference the docket numbers for
these projects (PF12–7–000 and PF12–
17–000) with your submission. The
Commission encourages electronic filing
of comments, and has expert staff
available to assist you at (202) 502–8258
or efiling@ferc.gov.
(1) You can file your comments
electronically using the eComment
feature located on the Commission’s
Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
Documents & Filings link. This is an
easy method for interested persons to
submit brief, text-only comments on a
project;
(2) You can file your comments
electronically using the eFiling feature
located on the Commission’s Web site
(www.ferc.gov) under the Documents &
Filings link. With eFiling, you can
provide comments in a variety of
formats by attaching them as a file with
your submission. New eFiling users
must first create an account by clicking
on ‘‘eRegister.’’ You must select the type
of filing you are making. If you are filing
a comment on a particular project,
please select ‘‘Comment on a Filing;’’ or
(3) You can file a paper copy of your
comments by mailing them to the
following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room
1A, Washington, DC 20426.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comments, you should be aware that the
entire text of your comments—including
your personal identifying information—
would be publicly available through the
FERC eLibrary system, if you file your
comments with the Secretary of the
Commission.
Environmental Mailing List
The FERC’s environmental mailing
list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and
agencies; elected officials;
environmental groups and nongovernmental organizations; interested
Indian tribes; other interested parties;
and local libraries and newspapers. This
list also includes all affected
landowners (as defined in the
Commission’s regulations) who are
potential right-of-way grantors, whose
property may be used temporarily for
project purposes, or who own homes
within certain distances of aboveground
facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the projects. We will
update the environmental mailing list as
the analysis proceeds to ensure that we
send the information related to this
environmental review to all individuals,
organizations, and government entities
interested in and/or potentially affected
by the planned projects. Please note that
if you submitted comments on the
previously reviewed projects (CP07–
441–000 and CP07–444–000) and want
to be involved in the currently proposed
projects (PF12–7–000 and PF12–17–
000) you must resubmit comments.
Copies of the completed draft EIS on
compact discs (CD) will be sent to the
environmental mailing list for public
review and comment. If you would
prefer to receive a paper copy of the
document instead of the CD version, or
would like to remove your name from
the mailing list, please return the
attached Information Request
(Appendix 2).
Becoming an Intervenor
Once Jordan Cove and Pacific
Connector file their applications with
the FERC, the Commission will issue a
Notice of Application. In response to the
Notice of Application, you may want to
file a request to become an ‘‘intervenor,’’
which is an official party to the
Commission’s proceeding. Intervenors
play a more formal role in the FERC
process, and are able to file briefs,
appear at hearings, and be heard by the
courts if they choose to appeal the
Commission’s final ruling. Instructions
for becoming an intervenor are in the
User’s Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’ link
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Notices
on the Commission’s Web site. Please
note that the Commission will not
accept requests for intervenor status
during the pre-filing period. You must
wait until the Commission receives
applications for these projects.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Administrative Review of BLM and
Forest Service Decisions To Amend
Land Management Plans
Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC,
Cameron LNG, LLC; Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement for the Planned Cameron
Pipeline Expansion Project and
Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project,
Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Public Scoping Meeting
Decisions by the BLM and Forest
Service to amend land management
plans are subject to administrative
review. In accordance with 36 CFR
219.59, the Forest Service has elected to
use the administrative review
procedures (otherwise known as protest
procedures) of the BLM. Administrative
objections to Forest Service land
management plan amendment decisions
and protests of BLM land management
plan amendment decisions may be filed
under the provisions of 43 CFR 1610.5–
2.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Additional Information
Additional information about the
projects is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs,
at (866) 208–FERC, or on the FERC Web
site (www.ferc.gov). On the FERC Web
page, go to Documents & Filings, and
click on the eLibrary link. Then click on
‘‘General Search,’’ and enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits
in the field (i.e., PF12–7 or PF12–17). Be
sure you have selected an appropriate
date range. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free
at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, contact
(202) 502–8659. The eLibrary link also
provides access to the texts of formal
documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and
rulemakings.
In addition, the Commission offers a
free service called eSubscription which
allows you to keep track of all formal
issuances and submittals in specific
dockets. This can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings
by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document
summaries, and direct links to the
documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/
esubscribenow.htm.
Finally, public meetings or site visits
will be posted on the Commission’s
calendar located at www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19781 Filed 8–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. PF12–12–000; PF12–13–000]
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
that will identify and address the
environmental impacts that could result
from the construction and operation of
the Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project
and the Cameron Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG) Liquefaction Project (collectively
Cameron Liquefaction Project or Project)
planned by Cameron Interstate Pipeline,
LLC and Cameron LNG, LLC
(collectively Cameron), respectively.
The Commission will use this EIS in its
decision-making process to determine
whether the Project is in the public
interest.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the Project.
Your input will help the Commission
staff determine what issues they need to
evaluate in the EIS. Please note that the
scoping period will close on September
4, 2012.
You may submit comments in written
form or verbally. Further details on how
to submit written comments are in the
Public Participation section of this
notice. In lieu of or in addition to
sending written comments, the
Commission invites you to attend the
public scoping meeting scheduled as
follows: FERC Public Scoping Meeting,
Cameron Liquefaction Project, August
21, 2012, 6:00 p.m., Holiday Inn Express
(Indigo Meeting), 330 Arena Road,
Sulphur, LA 70665.
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for this Project. State and
local government representatives should
notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, a company representative may
contact you about the acquisition of an
easement to construct, operate, and
maintain the planned facilities. The
company would seek to negotiate a
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48145
mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the Commission approves
the Project, that approval conveys with
it the right of eminent domain.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail
to produce an agreement, Cameron
could initiate condemnation
proceedings where compensation would
be determined in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility on My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Internet Web site
(www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet
addresses a number of typically asked
questions, including the use of eminent
domain and how to participate in the
Commission’s proceedings.
Summary of the Planned Project
Cameron plans to expand its existing
LNG import terminal in Cameron
Parish, Louisiana to enable the terminal
to liquefy natural gas and export the
LNG. The planned facility would have
an export capacity of 12 million metric
tons per year (MTPY) while maintaining
the current capability to import and regasify LNG. The related Cameron
Pipeline Expansion Project would be
constructed and operated to provide
natural gas to the planned export
terminal. The general locations of the
planned pipeline and LNG export
terminal are depicted in the figure
included as Appendix 1.1
The Cameron Pipeline Expansion
Project would include construction and
operation of the following facilities:
• Approximately 21 miles of new 42inch-diameter pipeline extending from
an interconnection with the Florida Gas
Transmission Pipeline in Calcasieu
Parish, Louisiana to a new
interconnection with the Trunkline Gas
Pipeline in Beauregard Parish,
Louisiana;
• A new 66,000-horsepower
compressor station in Calcasieu Parish,
Louisiana;
• A new interconnection and
metering facilities with the Trunkline
Gas Pipeline in Beauregard Parish,
Louisiana; and
• Modifications to existing
interconnections and metering facilities
in Beauregard, Calcasieu, and Cameron
Parishes.
1 The appendices referenced in this notice will
not appear in the Federal Register. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ‘‘eLibrary’’ or from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call (202)
502–8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48138-48145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19781]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Jordan Cove Energy Project LP--Docket No. PF12-7-000: Pacific
Connector Gas Pipeline LP--Docket No. PF12-17-000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Planned Jordan Cove Liquefaction and Pacific Connector Pipeline
Projects, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Public Scoping Meetings
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission), in cooperation with other federal agencies, will prepare
an environmental impact statement (EIS) that will discuss the
environmental impacts of Jordan Cove Energy Project LP's (Jordan Cove)
proposed liquefaction project in Coos County, Oregon, and Pacific
Connector Gas Pipeline LP's (Pacific Connector) proposed pipeline
project crossing portions of Klamath, Jackson, Douglas, and Coos
Counties, Oregon. The FERC is the lead federal agency in the
preparation of an EIS to satisfy the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The United States (U.S.) Army Corps of
Engineers (COE), U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy
(DOE), U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Forest Service),
and the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
(BLM), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), and Fish and Wildlife
Service are cooperating agencies assisting the FERC in preparation of
the EIS.
The Commission will use this EIS in its decision-making process, to
determine whether the Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal
is in the public interest, and whether the Pacific Connector pipeline
is in the public convenience and necessity, in accordance with the
Natural Gas Act (NGA). The BLM and Forest Service propose to adopt the
FERC EIS in accordance with Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
1506.3 to support decisions and findings that must be made by each
agency with respect to the Pacific Connector pipeline project.
This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission, Forest Service, BLM, and Reclamation will use to gather
input from the public and interested agencies on the planned projects.
Your input will help the Commission staff determine what issues should
be evaluated in the EIS. Please note that the scoping period will close
on September 4, 2012.
You may submit comments in written form or verbally. Further
details on how to submit written comments are in the Public
Participation section of this notice. In lieu of or in addition to
sending in written comments, the Commission invites you to make verbal
comments \1\ at the public scoping meetings scheduled as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Verbal comments at the public scoping meetings will be
transcribed by a court reporter and placed into the public record
for these proceedings.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, August 27, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, August 28, 2012, 6:30 p.m.
Southwestern Oregon Community Umpqua Community College, Campus
College, Hales Performing Arts Center Dining Room, 1140 Umpqua
Center, 1988 Newmark Ave., Coos College Rd., Roseburg, OR 97470,
Bay, OR 97420, 541-888-2525 541-440-4600
[[Page 48139]]
Wednesday, August 29, 2012, 6:30 Thursday, August 30, 2012, 6:30
p.m. p.m.
Oregon Institute of Technology, Medford School District, Education
College Union Auditorium, 3201 Center Auditorium, 815 S. Oakdale
Campus Dr., Klamath Falls, OR Ave., Medford, OR 97501, 541-842-
97601, 541-885-1030 3636.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for these projects. State and local government
representatives should notify their constituents about these projects
and this scoping effort, and encourage interested members of the public
to comment on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a Pacific Connector
representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the planned facilities. The company
would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if
the Commission approves the Pacific Connector pipeline project, that
approval conveys with it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if
easement negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline
company could initiate condemnation proceedings where compensation
would be determined in accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically-asked questions, including the use of eminent
domain and how to participate in the Commission's proceedings.
Background
On December 17, 2009, the Commission issued an Order authorizing
the Jordan Cove LNG import terminal in Docket No. CP07-444-000 and
Pacific Connector pipeline in Docket No. CP07-441-000. The Commission
vacated those authorizations in an Order issued April 16, 2012, after
Jordan Cove submitted its request to begin the pre-filing process to
change the facility's purpose from an LNG import terminal to an export
terminal.
The FERC staff and cooperating agencies produced an EIS for the
previous projects in May 2009. The new EIS for the currently proposed
projects will make use of the previous analyses, update information, as
needed, and evaluate the impacts associated with the new or modified
facilities and routes.
Summary of the Planned Projects
Jordan Cove proposes to construct and operate an LNG export
terminal on the North Spit of Coos Bay. The terminal would have the
capacity to produce about six million metric tons per annum (MMTPA) of
LNG (equivalent to 0.9 billion cubic feet per day [Bcf/d] of natural
gas). Facilities would include:
7.3-mile-long waterway in Coos Bay for about 80 LNG
carriers per year;
0.3-mile-long access channel and marine berth;
A cryogenic transfer pipeline;
Two 160,000 cubic meter LNG storage tanks;
Four liquefaction trains (each with a capacity of 1.5
MMTPA);
two feed gas and dehydration trains with a combined
throughput of 1 Bcf/d of natural gas; and
a 350 megawatt South Dunes power plant.
The Pacific Connector pipeline would be 36-inches-in-diameter and
about 230-miles-long, extending from interconnections with other
interstate pipelines near Malin, Oregon to the Jordan Cove LNG terminal
at Coos Bay. The pipeline would have a design capacity of 0.9 Bcf/d of
natural gas. Related facilities include:
Two meter stations at the interconnections with the
existing Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) and Ruby pipelines near
Malin, in Klamath County, Oregon;
A 23,000-horsepower compressor station adjacent to the GTN
and Ruby meter stations;
A meter station at the interconnection with the existing
Williams Northwest Pipeline system near Myrtle Creek, in Douglas
County, Oregon; and
A meter station at the Jordan Cove terminal, in Coos
County, Oregon.
The general location of the project facilities is shown in Appendix
1.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in
the Federal Register. Copies of the appendices were sent to all
those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 502-8371. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
The newly proposed Jordan Cove LNG export terminal in PF12-7-000
occupies the same footprint that was analyzed in our \3\ May 2009 EIS,
with the addition of the South Dunes power plant at the location of the
previously proposed dredged material placement area. Likewise, the
Pacific Connector pipeline as proposed in Docket PF12-17-000 basically
follows the route that was previously analyzed, with a few minor
adjustments, and the relocation of the compressor station to the east
end of the project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``We,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As presented in our May 2009 EIS, construction of the Jordan Cove's
LNG terminal would affect about 390 acres onshore, with an additional
72 acres needed to construct the marine berth and access channel for
the LNG ships in Coos Bay. Construction of the Pacific Connector
pipeline would affect a total of about 6,217 acres. The permanent
operational easement for the pipeline right-of-way (ROW) and
aboveground facilities would occupy about 1,439 acres.
The EIS Scoping Process
The NEPA requires the Commission to take into account the
environmental impacts that could result from an action whenever it
considers the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity, or makes a public interest determination. The NEPA also
requires us to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This process is referred to as scoping. The main goal of the
scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EIS on the important
environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to be addressed in the EIS. We will
consider all filed comments during the preparation of the EIS.
In the EIS we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the planned projects under these
general headings:
Land use;
Geology and soils;
Water resources and wetlands;
Vegetation and wildlife;
Cultural resources;
Recreation and visual resources;
Air quality and noise; and
Public safety.
We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the planned projects
or portions of the projects, and make recommendations on how to lessen
or avoid impacts on the various environmental resources. The EIS will
present our independent analysis of the issues.
Although no formal applications have been filed yet, we have
already initiated
[[Page 48140]]
our NEPA review under the Commission's pre-filing process. The purpose
of the pre-filing process is to encourage early involvement of
interested stakeholders, and to identify and resolve issues before the
FERC receives an application. As part of our pre-filing review, we have
begun to contact some federal and state agencies to discuss their
involvement in the scoping process and the preparation of the EIS.
The COE, DOE, Forest Service, BLM, and Reclamation also have
responsibilities under the NEPA, and can adopt the EIS for their own
agencies purposes. The BLM, Reclamation, and Forest Service will use
this EIS to evaluate the effects of the Pacific Connector pipeline
project on lands and facilities managed by these agencies. The BLM and
Forest Service will also use the EIS to address proposed amendments of
their respective land management plans \4\ that may be necessary to
make provision for the project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ BLM land management plans are called ``Resource Management
Plans'' or RMPs. Forest Service land management plans are called
``Land and Resource Management Plans'' or LRMPs. The term ``land
management plan'' is generic and may apply to either an RMP or LRMP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With this notice, we are asking other agencies with jurisdiction by
law and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues
related to the projects to formally cooperate with us in the
preparation of the EIS.\5\ Agencies that would like to request
cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided under the Public Participation section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing
cooperating agency responsibilities are at 40 CFR 1501.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We will publish and distribute a draft EIS for public comment.
After the comment period, we will consider all timely comments and
revise the document, as necessary, before issuing a final EIS. To
ensure we have the opportunity to consider and address your comments,
please carefully follow the instructions in the Public Participation
section of this notice.
Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act
In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA), we are using this notice to initiate
consultations with the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), and to solicit its views, and those of other government
agencies, interested Indian tribes, and the public on the projects'
potential effects on historic properties.\6\ The EIS will define the
project-specific area of potential effects (APE), determined in
consultation with the SHPO. On natural gas projects, the APE at a
minimum encompasses all areas subject to ground disturbance (including
the construction ROW, temporary extra workspaces, contractor/pipe
storage yards, compressor stations and other aboveground facilities,
and access roads). The EIS will document our findings on the projects'
potential impacts on historic properties and summarize the status of
consultations under section 106. The cooperating agencies will also
participate in the section 106 consultation process to ensure that
their requirements under the NHPA are met.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations
are at 36 CFR part 800. Those regulations define historic properties
as any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure,
or object included in or eligible for inclusion in the National
Register for Historic Places.
\7\ We and the federal land managing agencies previously
executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to resolve adverse effects
at historic properties for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal and Pacific
Connector pipeline in Docket Nos. CP07-441-000 and CP07-444-000. The
MOA will be amended for the new proposals under Docket Nos. PF12-7-
000 and PF12-17-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
The purpose of the public scoping process is to determine relevant
issues that will influence the scope of the environmental analysis,
including alternatives. Scoping also allows the public to comment on
the BLM and Forest Service plan amendment process, and the
consideration of a ROW Grant.
Based in part on our previous environmental analysis, information
provided by Jordan Cove and Pacific Connector for their new proposals,
and input from other federal and state resource agencies, and other
stakeholders, we have already identified several issues that we think
deserve attention during our current review. This preliminary list of
environmental issues may change based on your comments and our further
analysis. The FERC staff identified the following preliminary list of
issues:
Reliability and safety for LNG carrier traffic in Coos
Bay, the LNG terminal, and the pipeline;
Impacts on aquatic resources from dredging the LNG
terminal access channel and berth, and pipeline trenching in Coos Bay;
Geological hazards to the LNG terminal from seismic
activity;
Geological hazards, including landslides at steep slopes,
along the pipeline route;
Impacts of pipeline construction on federally listed
threatened and endangered species, including salmon, marbled murrelet,
and northern spotted owl;
Impacts of pipeline construction on private landowners;
and
Visual impacts resulting from construction and operation
of the projects.
Preliminary issues for the plan amendments have been identified by
BLM and Forest Service staff. The issues include:
Effects of proposed amendments on Survey and Manage
species and their habitat;
Effects of proposed amendments on contiguous existing or
recruitment habitat for marbled murrelets within 0.5 mile of occupied
marbled murrelet sites;
Effects of proposed amendments on habitat in Known Owl
Activity Centers (KOAC); and
Effects of the proposed amendments on Late Successional
Reserves (LSR).
Preliminary BLM and Forest Service planning criteria include:
Evaluation of significance of proposed amendments of
Forest Service Land and Resource Management Plans (LRMP) in the context
of goals and objectives of the affected LRMPs. Whether a plan amendment
is significant is guided by several factors, including the timing and
duration of the proposed change, the location and size of the project,
and how the proposed change could alter multiple-use goals and
objectives for long-term land and resource management;
Likelihood of persistence of affected Survey and Manage
species within the range of the northern spotted owl;
Amount and quality of marbled murrelet habitat affected by
construction and operation of the Pacific Connector pipeline project;
Amount and quality of habitat in KOAC affected by
construction and operation of the Pacific Connector pipeline project;
Functionality of LSR; and
Impacts on Connectivity and Diversity Blocks on BLM lands.
The BLM and Forest Service seek public input on issues and planning
criteria related to amendment of their District and Forest land
management plans related to the Pacific Connector pipeline project. The
BLM, Reclamation, and Forest Service also seek public input on issues
and planning criteria related to issuance of the ROW Grant, as
discussed below (under Proposed Actions of the BLM and Forest Service).
[[Page 48141]]
Proposed Actions of the DOE
The DOE must meet its obligation under section 3 of the NGA, to
authorize the import and export of natural gas, including LNG, unless
it finds that the proposed import or export will not be consistent with
the public interest. The purpose and need for DOE actions is to respond
to the application filed by Jordan Cove with the DOE on March 23, 2012
(FE Docket No. 12-32-LNG), seeking authorization to export up to 6
MMTPA of LNG, an export volume equivalent to about 292 Bcf per year of
natural gas, for a 25-year period, commencing the earlier of the date
of first export or seven years from the date of issuance of the
requested authorization. The LNG proposed for export would be from
Jordan Cove's proposed Coos Bay terminal to any country: (1) With which
the U.S. does not have a free trade agreement requiring the national
treatment for trade in natural gas; (2) that has, or in the future
develops, the capacity to import LNG; and (3) with which trade is not
prohibited by U.S. law or policy.
Because the proposed projects may involve actions in floodplains,
in accordance with 10 CFR part 1022, Compliance with Floodplain and
Wetland Environmental Review Requirements, the EIS will include a
floodplain assessment, as appropriate. A floodplain statement of
findings will be included in any DOE determinations.
Proposed Actions of the BLM and Forest Service
The purpose of and need for the proposed action by the BLM is to
respond to a ROW Grant application originally submitted by Pacific
Connector on April 17, 2006 to construct, operate, maintain, and
eventually decommission a natural gas pipeline that crosses lands and
facilities administered by the BLM, Reclamation, and Forest Service. In
addition, there is a need for the BLM and the Forest Service to
consider amending affected District and Forest land management plans to
make provision for the Pacific Connector ROW.
The proposed action of the BLM and Forest Service has two
components. First, the BLM would amend its Resource Management Plans
(RMP) for the Coos Bay, Roseburg, and Medford Districts, and Klamath
Falls Resource Area of the Lakeview District; while the Forest Service
would amend its LRMPs for the Umpqua, Rogue River, and Winema National
Forests to make provisions for the Pacific Connector pipeline project.
Reclamation has no land use plan amendments associated with this
action. Second, in accordance with 43 CFR 2882.3(i), the BLM would
issue a ROW Grant in response to Pacific Connector's application for
the project to occupy federal lands, with the written concurrence of
the Forest Service and Reclamation. Each agency may submit specific
stipulations, including mitigation measures, for inclusion in the ROW
Grant related to lands, facilities, and easements within their
respective jurisdictions.
The Secretary of the Interior has delegated authority to the BLM to
grant a ROW in response to Pacific Connector's application for natural
gas transmission on federal lands under the Mineral Leasing Act of
1920. The Responsible Official for amendments of BLM RMPs and issuance
of the ROW Grant is the BLM Oregon/Washington State Director. The
Responsible Official for amendment of Forest Service LRMPs is the
Forest Supervisor of the Umpqua National Forest. The Responsible
Official for concurrence on issuance of the ROW Grant by Reclamation is
the Area Manager of the Mid-Pacific Region's Klamath Basin Area Office.
In accordance with 36 CFR 219.17(b)(2), the Deciding Official for the
Forest Service has elected to use the 1982 planning rule procedures to
amend Forest Service LRMPs as provided in the transition procedures of
the 2000 planning rule.
If the BLM adopts the new FERC EIS for the Pacific Connector
pipeline project (in Docket No. PF12-17-000), the Oregon/Washington
State Director of the BLM will make the following decisions and
determinations:
Determine whether to amend the RMPs for the BLM Coos Bay,
Roseburg, and Medford Districts and the Klamath Falls Resource Area of
the Lakeview District as proposed or as described in an alternative to
the Proposed Action; and
Respond to the Pacific Connector application, with
concurrence of Reclamation and Forest Service, by issuing a ROW Grant,
granting the ROW with conditions, or denying the application.
If the Forest Service adopts the new FERC EIS for the Pacific
Connector pipeline project (in Docket No. PF12-17-000), the Forest
Supervisor of the Umpqua National Forest will make the following
decisions and determinations:
Decide whether to amend the LRMPs of the Umpqua, Rogue
River, and Winema National Forests as proposed or as described in an
alternative; and
Determine the significance of the proposed amendments or
alternatives in accordance with national forest planning regulation 36
CFR 219.10(f) (1982 procedures) using criteria in Forest Service Manual
1926.5
Amendment of BLM and Forest Service Land Management Plans
BLM/FS-1--Site-Specific Waiver of Management Recommendations for Survey
and Manage Species on the BLM Coos Bay District, Roseburg District,
Medford District, and Klamath Falls Resource Area of the Lakeview
District RMPs, and the Umpqua National Forest, Rogue River National
Forest, and Winema National Forest LRMPs
Applicable BLM District RMPs and National Forest LRMPs would be
amended to exempt certain known sites within the area of the proposed
Pacific Connector ROW Grant from the Management Recommendations
required by the 2001 ``Record of Decision and Standards and Guidelines
for Amendments to the Survey and Manage, Protection Buffer, and other
Mitigation Measures Standards and Guidelines,'' as modified in July
2011. For known sites within the proposed ROW that cannot be avoided,
the 2001 Management Recommendations for protection of known sites of
Survey and Manage species would not apply. For known sites located
outside the proposed ROW but with an overlapping protection buffer only
that portion of the buffer within the ROW would be exempt from the
protection requirements of the Management Recommendations. Those
Management Recommendations would remain in effect for that portion of
the protection buffer that is outside of the ROW. The proposed
amendment would not exempt the BLM or the Forest Service from the
requirements of the 2001 Survey and Manage Record of Decision, as
modified, to maintain species persistence for affected Survey and
Manage species within the range of the northern spotted owl. This is a
site-specific amendment applicable only to the Pacific Connector ROW
and would not change future management direction at any other location.
Amendments of BLM RMPs
BLM-1--Site-Specific Exemption of Requirement To Protect Marbled
Murrelet Habitat on the BLM Coos Bay and Roseburg Districts
The Coos Bay District and Roseburg District RMPs would be amended
to waive the requirements to protect contiguous existing and
recruitment habitat for marbled murrelets within the Pacific Connector
ROW that is within 0.5 miles of occupied marbled murrelet sites, as
mapped by the BLM. This is a
[[Page 48142]]
site-specific amendment applicable only to the Pacific Connector ROW
and would not change future management direction at any other location.
BLM-2--Site Specific Exemption of Requirement To Retain Habitat in KOAC
on the BLM Roseburg District
The Roseburg District RMP would be amended to exempt the Pacific
Connector pipeline project from the requirement to retain habitat in
KOAC at three locations. This is a site-specific amendment applicable
only to the Pacific Connector ROW and would not change future
management direction at any other location.
BLM-3--Reallocation of Matrix Lands to LSR, Roseburg District
The Roseburg District RMP would be amended to change the
designation of approximately 409 acres from Matrix land allocations to
the LSR land allocation in Sections 32 and 34, Township (T.) 29\1/2\
South (S.), Range (R.) 7 West (W.); and Section 1, T.30S.,
R.7W.,Willamette Meridian (W.M.), Oregon (OR). This change in land
allocation is proposed to mitigate the potential adverse impact of the
Pacific Connector pipeline project on LSRs in the Roseburg District.
The amendment would change future management direction for the lands
reallocated from Matrix lands to LSR.
BLM-4--Reallocation of Matrix Lands to LSR, Coos Bay District
The Coos Bay District RMP would be amended to change the
designation of approximately 454 acres from Matrix land allocations to
the LSR land allocation in Sections 19 and 29 of T.28S., R.10W., W.M.,
OR. This change in land allocation is proposed to mitigate the
potential adverse impact of the Pacific Connector pipeline project on
LSRs in the Coos Bay District. The amendment would change future
management direction for the lands reallocated from Matrix lands to
LSR.
Amendment of the Umpqua National Forest LRMP
UNF-1--Site-Specific Amendment To Allow Removal of Effective Shade on
Perennial Streams
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP would be amended to change the
Standards and Guidelines for Fisheries (Umpqua National Forest LRMP,
page IV-33, Forest-Wide) to allow the removal of effective shading
vegetation where perennial streams are crossed by the Pacific Connector
ROW. This change would potentially affect an estimated total of three
acres of effective shading vegetation at approximately five perennial
stream crossings in the East Fork of Cow Creek subwatershed from
pipeline mileposts (MP) 109 to 110 in Sections 16 and 21, T.32S.,
R.2W., W.M., OR. This is a site-specific amendment applicable only to
the Pacific Connector ROW and would not change future management
direction at any other location.
UNF-2--Site-Specific Amendment To Allow Utility Corridors in Riparian
Areas
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP would be amended to change
prescriptions C2-II (LRMP IV-173) and C2-IV (LRMP IV-177) to allow the
Pacific Connector pipeline route to run parallel to the East Fork of
Cow Creek for approximately 0.1 mile between about pipeline MPs 109.5
and 109.6 in Section 21, T.32S., R.2W., W. M., OR. This change would
potentially affect approximately one acre of riparian vegetation along
the East Fork of Cow Creek. This is a site-specific amendment
applicable only to the Pacific Connector ROW and would not change
future management direction at any other location.
UNF-3--Site-Specific Amendment To Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector ROW in All Management Areas
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP would be amended to waive
limitations on the area affected by detrimental soil conditions from
displacement and compaction within the Pacific Connector ROW. Standards
and Guidelines for Soils (LRMP page IV-67) requires that not more than
20 percent of the project area have detrimental compaction,
displacement, or puddling after completion of a project. This is a
site-specific amendment applicable only to the Pacific Connector ROW
and would not change future management direction at any other location.
UNF-4--Reallocation of Matrix Lands to LSR
The Umpqua National Forest LRMP would be amended to change the
designation of approximately 588 acres from Matrix land allocations to
the LSR land allocation in Sections 7, 18, and 19, T.32S., R.2W.; and
Sections 13 and 24, T.32S., R.3W., W.M., OR. This change in land
allocation is proposed to partially mitigate the potential adverse
impact of the Pacific Connector pipeline project on LSR 223 on the
Umpqua National Forest. This amendment would change future management
direction for the lands reallocated from Matrix to LSR.
Amendment of the Rogue River National Forest LRMP
RRNF-1--Amendment To Provide for Energy Transmission
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to establish
a Forest Plan objective that states: ``While considering other multiple
use values, the Forest shall facilitate and make provision for energy
transmission via the Pacific Connector consistent with the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, the Mineral Leasing Act, the Natural Gas Act, the
Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act, and the National Forest Management
Act.''
RRNF-2--Site-Specific Amendment of Visual Quality Objectives (VQO) on
the Big Elk Road
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to change the
VQO where the Pacific Connector pipeline route crosses the Big Elk Road
at about pipeline MP 161.4 in Section 16, T.37S., R.4E., W.M., OR, from
Foreground Retention (Management Strategy 6, LRMP page 4-72) to
Foreground Partial Retention (Management Strategy 7, LRMP page 4-86)
and allow 10-15 years for amended VQO to be attained. The existing
Standards and Guidelines for VQO in Foreground Retention where the
Pacific Connector pipeline route crosses the Big Elk Road require that
VQOs be met within one year of completion of the project and that
management activities not be visually evident. This amendment would
apply only to the Pacific Connector pipeline project in the vicinity of
Big Elk Road and would not change future management direction for any
other project.
RRNF-3--Site-Specific Amendment of VQO on the Pacific Crest Trail
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to change the
VQO where the Pacific Connector pipeline route crosses the Pacific
Crest Trail at about pipeline MP 168 in Section 32, T.37S., R.5E.,
W.M., OR, from Foreground Partial Retention (Management Strategy 7,
LRMP page 4-86) to Modification (USDA Forest Service Agricultural
Handbook 478) and to allow 15-20 years for amended VQOs to be attained.
The existing Standards and Guidelines for VQOs in Foreground Partial
Retention in the area where the Pacific Connector pipeline route
crosses the Pacific Crest Trail require that visual mitigation measures
meet the stated VQO within three years of the completion of the project
and that management activities be visually subordinate to the
landscape. This
[[Page 48143]]
amendment would apply only to the Pacific Connector pipeline project in
the vicinity of the Pacific Crest Trail and would not change future
management direction for any other project.
RRNF-4--Site-Specific Amendment of Visual Quality Objectives Adjacent
to Highway 140
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to allow 10-
15 years to meet the VQO of Middleground Partial Retention between
Pacific Connector pipeline MPs 156.3 to 156.8 and 157.2 to 157.5 in
Sections 11 and 12, T.37S., R.3E., W.M., OR. Standards and Guidelines
for Middleground Partial Retention (Management Strategy 9, LRMP Page 4-
112) require that VQOs for a given location be achieved within three
years of completion of the project. Approximately 0.8 miles or 9 acres
of the Pacific Connector ROW in the Middleground Partial Retention VQO
visible at distances of 0.75 to 5 miles from State Highway 140 would be
affected by this amendment. This amendment would apply only to the
Pacific Connector pipeline project in Sections 11 and 12, T.37S.,
R.3E., W.M., OR, and would not change future management direction for
any other project.
RRNF-5--Site-Specific Amendment To Allow Utility Transmission Corridors
in Management Strategy 26, Restricted Riparian Areas
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to allow the
Pacific Connector ROW to cross the Restricted Riparian land allocation.
This would potentially affect approximately 2.5 acres of the Restricted
Riparian Management Strategy at one perennial stream crossing on the
South Fork of Little Butte Creek at about pipeline MP 162.45 in Section
15, T.37S., R.4E., W.M., OR. Standards and Guidelines for the
Restricted Riparian land allocation prescribe locating transmission
corridors outside of this land allocation (Management Strategy 26, LRMP
page 4-308,). This is a site-specific amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not change future management direction
at any other location.
RRNF-6--Site-Specific Amendment To Waive Limitations on Detrimental
Soil Conditions Within the Pacific Connector ROW in All Management
Areas
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to waive
limitations on areas affected by detrimental soil conditions from
displacement and compaction within the Pacific Connector ROW in all
affected Management Strategies. Standards and Guidelines for
detrimental soil impacts in affected Management Strategies require that
no more than 10 percent of an activity area should be compacted,
puddled or displaced upon completion of project (not including
permanent roads or landings). No more than 20 percent of the area
should be displaced or compacted under circumstances resulting from
previous management practices including roads and landings. Permanent
recreation facilities or other permanent facilities are exempt (RRNF
LRMP 4-41, 4-83, 4-97, 4-123, 4-177, 4-307). This is a site-specific
amendment applicable only to the Pacific Connector ROW and would not
change future management direction at any other location.
RRNF-7--Reallocation of Matrix Lands to LSR
The Rogue River National Forest LRMP would be amended to change the
designation of approximately 512 acres from Matrix land allocations to
the LSR land allocation in Section 32, T.36S., R.4E. W.M., OR. This
change in land allocation is proposed to partially mitigate the
potential adverse impact of the Pacific Connector pipeline project on
LSR 227 on the Rogue River National Forest. This amendment would change
future management direction for the lands reallocated from Matrix to
LSR.
Amendment of the Winema National Forest LRMP
WNF-1--Site-Specific Amendment To Allow Utility Corridors in Management
Area 3
The Winema National Forest LRMP would be amended to change the
Standards and Guidelines for Management Area 3 (MA-3) (LRMP page 4-103-
4, Lands) to allow the 95-foot-wide Pacific Connector pipeline corridor
in MA-3 from the Forest Boundary in Section 32, T.37S., R.5E., W.M.,
OR, to the Clover Creek Road corridor in Section 4, T.38S, R.5. E.,
W.M., OR. Standards and Guidelines for MA-3 state that the area is
currently an avoidance area for new utility corridors. This proposed
new utility corridor is approximately 1.5 miles long and occupies
approximately 17 acres. This is a site-specific amendment applicable
only to the Pacific Connector ROW and would not change future
management direction at any other location.
WNF-2--Site-Specific Amendment of VQO on the Dead Indian Memorial
Highway
The Winema National Forest LRMP would be amended to allow 10-15
years to achieve the VQO of Foreground Retention where the Pacific
Connector ROW crosses the Dead Indian Memorial Highway at approximately
pipeline MP 168.8 in Section 33, T.37S., R.5E., W. M., OR. Standards
and Guidelines for Scenic Management, Foreground Retention (LRMP 4-103,
MA 3A, Foreground Retention) requires VQOs for a given location be
achieved within one year of completion of the project. The Forest
Service proposes to allow 10-15 years to meet the specified VQO at this
location. This is a site-specific amendment that would apply only to
the Pacific Connector pipeline project in the vicinity of the Dead
Indian Memorial Highway and would not change future management
direction for any other project.
WNF-3--Site-Specific Amendment of VQO Adjacent to the Clover Creek Road
The Winema National Forest LRMP would be amended to allow 10-15
years to meet the VQO for Scenic Management, Foreground Partial
Retention, where the Pacific Connector Right-of-Way is adjacent to the
Clover Creek Road from approximately pipeline MP 170 to 175 in Sections
2, 3, 4, 11, and 12, T.38S., R.5E., and Sections 7 and 18, T.38S.,
R.6E., W.M., OR. This change would potentially affect approximately 50
acres. Standards and Guidelines for Foreground Partial Retention (LRMP,
page 4-107, MA 3B) require that VQOs be met within three years of
completion of a project. This is a site-specific amendment would apply
only to the Pacific Connector pipeline project in the vicinity of
Clover Creek Road and would not change future management direction for
any other project.
WNF-4--Site-Specific Amendment To Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector ROW in All Management Areas
The Winema National Forest LRMP would be amended to waive
restrictions on detrimental soil conditions from displacement and
compaction within the Pacific Connector ROW in all affected management
areas. Standards and Guidelines for detrimental soil impacts in all
affected management areas require that no more than 20 percent of the
activity area be detrimentally compacted, puddled, or displaced upon
completion of a project (LRMP page 4-73, 12-5). This is a site-
[[Page 48144]]
specific amendment applicable only to the Pacific Connector ROW and
would not change future management direction at any other location.
WNF-5--Site-Specific Amendment To Waive Limitations on Detrimental Soil
Conditions Within the Pacific Connector ROW in Management Area 8
The Winema National Forest LRMP would be amended to waive
restrictions on detrimental soil conditions from displacement and
compaction within the Pacific Connector ROW within the Management Area
8, Riparian Area (MA-8). This change would potentially affect
approximately 0.5 mile or an estimated 9.6 acres of MA-8. Standards and
Guidelines for Soil and Water, MA-8 require that not more than 10
percent of the total riparian zone in an activity area be in a
detrimental soil condition upon the completion of a project (LRMP page
4-137, 2). This is a site-specific amendment applicable only to the
Pacific Connector ROW and would not change future management direction
at any other location.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Jordan Cove and Pacific Connector
projects, and proposed BLM and Forest Service land management plan
amendments. Your comments should focus on the potential environmental
effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen
environmental impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that your comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send your comments so that the Commission receives
them in Washington DC on or before September 4, 2012.
The BLM, Reclamation, and Forest Service are participating as
cooperating agencies with the FERC in this public scoping process. With
this notice, the BLM is requesting comments through the FERC's public
scoping process on proposed amendments of BLM RMPs to make provision
for the Pacific Connector ROW on the Coos Bay, Roseburg, and Medford
Districts and Klamath Falls Resource Area of the Lakeview District. The
BLM is also requesting public comments on the issuance of the ROW Grant
that would allow the Pacific Connector pipeline to occupy federal land.
The Forest Service is requesting public comments on the proposed
amendments of Forest Service LRMPs to make provision for the Pacific
Connector ROW on the Rogue River, Umpqua, and Winema National Forests.
Timely comments submitted by the public in response to the NOI
previously issued by the Forest Service to make provision for the
Pacific Connector ROW, published in the Federal Register on June 15,
2009 (Vol. 74, No. 113, pages 27214-28217), will be considered in this
scoping process if they are applicable to the current Forest Service
proposal. Reclamation has no proposed land management plan amendments,
but will consider comments related to the ROW Grant on Reclamation-
administered lands and facilities.
Comments on actions by the BLM, Reclamation, or Forest Service
should be submitted through the FERC comment process and within the
timeline described. The submission of timely and specific comments can
affect a reviewer's ability to participate in subsequent administrative
or judicial review of BLM and Forest Service decisions. Comments
concerning BLM and Forest Service actions submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however such anonymous submittals would not
provide the commenters with standing to participate in administrative
or judicial review of BLM and Forest Service decisions.
For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your comments to the FERC. In all instances, please reference the
docket numbers for these projects (PF12-7-000 and PF12-17-000) with
your submission. The Commission encourages electronic filing of
comments, and has expert staff available to assist you at (202) 502-
8258 or efiling@ferc.gov.
(1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature located on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
Documents & Filings link. This is an easy method for interested persons
to submit brief, text-only comments on a project;
(2) You can file your comments electronically using the eFiling
feature located on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
Documents & Filings link. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a
variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing;'' or
(3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comments, you should be
aware that the entire text of your comments--including your personal
identifying information--would be publicly available through the FERC
eLibrary system, if you file your comments with the Secretary of the
Commission.
Environmental Mailing List
The FERC's environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and
local government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental groups and non-governmental organizations; interested
Indian tribes; other interested parties; and local libraries and
newspapers. This list also includes all affected landowners (as defined
in the Commission's regulations) who are potential right-of-way
grantors, whose property may be used temporarily for project purposes,
or who own homes within certain distances of aboveground facilities,
and anyone who submits comments on the projects. We will update the
environmental mailing list as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we
send the information related to this environmental review to all
individuals, organizations, and government entities interested in and/
or potentially affected by the planned projects. Please note that if
you submitted comments on the previously reviewed projects (CP07-441-
000 and CP07-444-000) and want to be involved in the currently proposed
projects (PF12-7-000 and PF12-17-000) you must resubmit comments.
Copies of the completed draft EIS on compact discs (CD) will be
sent to the environmental mailing list for public review and comment.
If you would prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of
the CD version, or would like to remove your name from the mailing
list, please return the attached Information Request (Appendix 2).
Becoming an Intervenor
Once Jordan Cove and Pacific Connector file their applications with
the FERC, the Commission will issue a Notice of Application. In
response to the Notice of Application, you may want to file a request
to become an ``intervenor,'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
FERC process, and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be
heard by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final
ruling. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are in the User's Guide
under the ``e-filing'' link
[[Page 48145]]
on the Commission's Web site. Please note that the Commission will not
accept requests for intervenor status during the pre-filing period. You
must wait until the Commission receives applications for these
projects.
Administrative Review of BLM and Forest Service Decisions To Amend Land
Management Plans
Decisions by the BLM and Forest Service to amend land management
plans are subject to administrative review. In accordance with 36 CFR
219.59, the Forest Service has elected to use the administrative review
procedures (otherwise known as protest procedures) of the BLM.
Administrative objections to Forest Service land management plan
amendment decisions and protests of BLM land management plan amendment
decisions may be filed under the provisions of 43 CFR 1610.5-2.
Additional Information
Additional information about the projects is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). On the FERC Web page, go to Documents &
Filings, and click on the eLibrary link. Then click on ``General
Search,'' and enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits
in the field (i.e., PF12-7 or PF12-17). Be sure you have selected an
appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208-3676,
or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659. The eLibrary link also provides
access to the texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such
as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19781 Filed 8-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P